TRANSCRIPTEnglish

WTF: Biden is FORCING Affirmative Action on HOUSES for SALE!

12m 19s1,983 words292 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

well good old Joe Biden and the Biden

0:03

Administration are now bringing

0:06

affirmative action to real estate

0:10

maybe not directly but to some extent

0:13

yeah there is now a new announcement out

0:17

from the Biden Administration that

0:19

listen to this they are going to hike

0:22

payments for good credit home buyers to

0:26

subsidize higher risk low-income

0:30

minority borrowers that's right so if

0:34

you've done right with your finances you

0:37

have a higher credit score and a higher

0:39

down payment you're now going to have to

0:41

pay a higher monthly payment to

0:44

subsidize people who just didn't operate

0:47

their finances as well on one side

0:50

people are arguing hey well In fairness

0:54

maybe you had the better opportunity to

0:56

go to a better school because you were

0:58

in a minority on the other side people

1:00

are like f that I worked my ass off to

1:03

get where I am and I shouldn't have to

1:05

subsidize somebody else that's the

1:07

government's job not my job government

1:10

shouldn't be making it more expensive

1:11

for me to operate because somebody else

1:14

didn't

1:15

do as well well that's exactly what's

1:18

Happening Here home buyers with good

1:21

credit scores will soon encounter a

1:24

costly surprise the article speaks

1:28

home buyers will be forced by a new

1:31

federal rule to pay higher mortgage

1:33

rates and fees to subsidize people with

1:36

riskier credit profiles who are also in

1:38

the market to buy homes effective May 1

1:41

the fhfa the federal housing and Finance

1:44

Agency will push for more affordable

1:48

housing and they will enact what are

1:50

called loan level price adjustments to

1:53

make it more expensive for you if you

1:55

have a higher credit score here's

1:57

basically how that works basically the

2:01

way it works is usually when you go into

2:03

a bank you might see something like this

2:06

you might see okay if you have a 740

2:09

credit score we'll give you a rate of

2:11

6.5

2:12

okay you have a 720 credit score we'll

2:16

go ahead and give you the 625 or the

2:18

6.75 but we're going to go ahead and hit

2:21

you with a low level price adjustment of

2:23

20 basis points right you have a 700 you

2:27

might get that 6.75 plus 0.40 right and

2:32

this is usually the kind of metric and

2:34

I'm making this this metric up but this

2:37

is just to make it simple math kind of

2:39

what it looks like when you go qualify

2:42

for a loan every 20 points your credit

2:44

score is lower you tend to have to pay a

2:48

little bit more of an interest rate and

2:51

you either pay this in a higher interest

2:54

rate or in higher points so it's either

2:57

rate or points points are basically the

3:01

loan fees that you pay so these basis

3:04

points could be part of your interest

3:05

rate or they could be part of the points

3:07

you pay and usually you get the best

3:09

pricing at 740. but basically what the

3:12

Biden Administration is now trying to do

3:14

is they're trying to distort the normal

3:17

way this looks and they're basically

3:19

trying to say hey if you have like a 740

3:21

credit score and you're doing the right

3:23

thing you're putting 15 to 20 percent

3:25

down you were going to take those Rich

3:28

borrowers and we're going to potentially

3:30

charge them forty dollars a month on a

3:34

400k property we're gonna give them a

3:38

low level price adjustment we're going

3:40

to charge whoops we're going to charge

3:42

those people more money and as we charge

3:46

these rich people so to speak even

3:48

though they could be first-time home

3:50

buyers too who just got off on the right

3:52

foot or or are trying to do the right

3:54

thing we're gonna charge them more money

3:56

because that way we won't have to charge

4:00

these people more money who are more

4:02

risky who have a riskier credit profile

4:05

who should be paying higher rates

4:08

because they're more risky but the Biden

4:10

Administration says no we don't want the

4:12

free market to charge riskier borrowers

4:15

more money we're going to charge the

4:17

safer borrowers more money because the

4:20

riskier borrowers are more likely to be

4:22

Black Or Hispanic and the higher credit

4:25

profile borrowers are more likely to be

4:28

white so because we want more racial

4:32

support and racial equity and we want to

4:35

guarantee more equal results for people

4:37

rather than just equal opportunity given

4:40

that no matter what your race is you

4:42

have the Equal Opportunity of getting

4:43

transparent pricing based on a higher

4:46

credit score rather than letting the

4:48

free market do its work the buy the

4:50

administration would prefer to just

4:52

charge richer more predominantly white

4:55

people more money and give that to the

4:58

riskier borrowers now that's my

5:01

explanation of it but let's just go

5:03

ahead and see that example in writing

5:05

from the the uh the research piece here

5:07

which has mortgage industry Specialists

5:10

say home buyers with credit scores of

5:12

seven is 680 or higher will pay about

5:14

forty dollars more per month on a home

5:17

loan of four hundred thousand dollars

5:18

home buyers who make down payments of

5:20

fifteen to twenty percent will get

5:21

socked with the largest fees now do keep

5:24

in mind in my example just to make it a

5:26

little bit more clear I have implied

5:28

that 680 was closer to the bottom keep

5:30

in mind you could buy a home all the way

5:31

up to like a 600 and 580 and 620 credit

5:35

score so maybe I should have drawn this

5:37

all the way down here and basically said

5:39

this whatever it's the same thing the

5:41

point is the higher credit score people

5:42

and the ones putting 15 to 20 down

5:45

they're gonna pay the largest fees

5:47

the new fees will start for people who

5:49

buy or refinance refinance as well after

5:52

May 1. here it is an individual in the

5:56

Bay Area who works for Bay Equity Home

5:58

Loans who says these changes don't make

6:00

sense penalizing borrowers with larger

6:03

down payments and credit scores will not

6:05

go over well and it's also confusing to

6:07

Borrowers

6:08

and here's someone else the president of

6:11

the National Association of Realtors uh

6:14

let's

6:15

big position here who says in the wake

6:16

of three percentage Point increases in

6:18

mortgage rates now is not the time to

6:21

raise fees on any home borrowers and the

6:24

fhfa says that the fee will increase

6:27

pricing support for borrowers limited by

6:31

income or wealth they say the overall

6:33

charge is minimal I hate to say it but

6:36

every 40 bucks with how expensive things

6:38

are every 40 bucks is a little more than

6:41

minimal if you think about it that's

6:42

about 500 more per year

6:46

that's basically making home ownership

6:48

more unaffordable for the people who

6:51

made sure they had the best credit score

6:52

the best income it seems like a slap in

6:55

the face to people trying to do the

6:57

right thing

6:58

the agency is also instead now going to

7:02

delay a fee for people with higher debt

7:06

to income ratios so in other words

7:08

they're burning the candle at both ends

7:10

of the stick they're basically saying

7:12

okay people with higher debt levels were

7:16

not going to charge them more money

7:18

we're going to delay that fee until

7:19

August for people with more debt and

7:23

instead people with less debt higher

7:25

credit scores and more down payment will

7:27

charge them more sooner

7:30

so in other words the goal here is to

7:33

subsidize risky or riskier borrowers

7:36

listen to these segments the fee changes

7:39

are intended to subsidize high-risk

7:41

borrowers by imposing an intentional

7:44

disruption to the traditional risk-based

7:46

pricing exactly it's the rich paying for

7:50

the poor why is it and it's not even

7:52

fair to call rich people first time home

7:54

buyers putting 15 down they're not rich

7:57

that's just the way they're trying to

7:59

cast it so maybe I should stop saying it

8:00

it's more the financially potentially

8:03

capable versus the incapable I don't

8:06

know anyway why was this done the answer

8:08

was simple it was to try to narrow the

8:11

Gap in access to credit especially for

8:13

minority home buyers who often have

8:16

lower down payments and lower credit

8:17

scores I wrote this is basically

8:20

affirmative action for housing you're

8:23

basically saying hey if you're black or

8:27

you're Hispanic or you're a minority to

8:29

some Next Step you get easier access to

8:34

home ownership and if you're white you

8:38

get worse access to home ownership which

8:40

is basically what happens at comp or or

8:44

should I say schools like Harvard or Ivy

8:47

Leagues or a lot of colleges where

8:49

colleges say hey the test scores we

8:51

require from a white male are higher

8:54

than the test scores we require from a

8:56

blackmail

8:57

okay the thesis is that that should be

9:01

sort of a way to repay for prior

9:03

struggles uh that uh black families Or

9:07

Hispanic families may have had because

9:08

maybe they grew up in a more

9:10

poverty-stricken area which had worse

9:13

schooling worse opportunities for jobs

9:15

worse internships worse job growth

9:18

opportunities or mentorship

9:20

opportunities worse Financial education

9:23

my response to that is all of our

9:26

schools mostly suck most of them should

9:30

be revised with substantial Financial

9:32

education and rather than trying to fix

9:35

the problem here why don't we go to the

9:37

root cause and rather than screwing up

9:39

the economy why don't we go to the root

9:41

cause and start actually spending more

9:44

to fix our schools by instituting

9:47

Financial education programs in all of

9:49

our schools but start with the poorest

9:51

fix the schools in the poorest areas

9:53

first then introduce more financial

9:56

education the poorer areas start

9:58

actually fixing the root cause rather

10:01

than trying to bandage the problem but

10:04

no no the government would rather do

10:07

this she once again is backwards but

10:09

it's probably a way of attracting voters

10:12

and the Democratic base anyway the Gap

10:16

in home ownership opportunity is real is

10:18

the argument on one side that hey maybe

10:20

this will help lessen the gap between

10:22

home ownership and it's true white

10:25

individuals own substantially more homes

10:27

than black individuals black individuals

10:30

are much more likely to be tenants than

10:32

white individuals and unfortunately when

10:35

it comes to net worth we know this

10:37

because I teach it on my channel

10:39

regularly and I have courses on building

10:41

your wealth specifically zero to

10:43

millionaire real estate investing we

10:45

know that the average net worth of a

10:48

tenant is somewhere around

10:51

180 or sorry uh the average net worth of

10:54

a homeowner is somewhere around 180 000

10:56

whereas the average net worth of a

10:58

tenant is somewhere around a paltry five

11:01

thousand six hundred dollars so you have

11:04

a massive disparity between net worth

11:06

between homeowners and tenants

11:08

and unfortunately uh home ownership is

11:12

Out Of Reach for some folks because of

11:14

their jobs their debts their credit

11:16

scores or otherwise but the Biden

11:18

administration's solution here seems to

11:21

be to reward poor financial decisions

11:24

rather than going to the root cause of

11:26

the problem maybe providing more

11:28

opportunities in school and more

11:30

education for people in school than

11:32

trying to bandage the problem like this

11:34

which just ends up creating more

11:36

disparities in the free market economy

11:39

of home ownership in other words people

11:41

who are saving more money shouldn't be

11:43

punished for having a better credit

11:45

score and having saved more money than

11:47

individuals who have a worse credit

11:49

score it seems backwards it actually

11:52

feels

11:53

anti-American to say that the people who

11:55

worked the hardest to have the best

11:57

financial standing should pay the

11:59

highest fees feels backwards but then

12:02

again the other side is making the

12:04

argument that well In fairness because

12:07

of like affirmative actions style

12:09

policies this is what we want to do

12:11

that's what the Biden Administration is

12:13

up to so think about that and take it

12:15

for what you may

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.