TRANSCRIPTEnglish

buy

33m 48s6,132 words879 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Bank of America is now warning that cash

0:02

levels have fallen to such a low point

0:06

that out of every single time in the

0:09

last 20 times this has occurred. On

0:13

every single occasion, stocks fell and

0:17

treasury bonds outperformed in the

0:20

following one to three months. Cash

0:25

levels are now at just 3.7%

0:28

in the fund manager survey and Bank of

0:31

America is citing this is a warning

0:33

sign. Now JP Morgan has this massive

0:37

report on the outlook for 2026 which

0:40

we're going to break down as well so we

0:43

can see where the minds of investors are

0:45

today because we've got this crazy

0:48

duality going on. Stocks are red and

0:51

they're trying to recover. We've got

0:53

people worried about recession on one

0:55

side, others seeing it as a buying

0:57

opportunity. I'll tell you this morning,

1:00

I have to say I bought some of the dip.

1:02

The Q's had a glorious dip and AMD lost

1:05

that 232 line as our strategy this

1:08

morning. I actually bought a short-term

1:10

call option as well as buying the dip.

1:13

But in the alpha report this morning, we

1:15

bought some longer plays and a

1:17

short-term call option in some of the

1:20

mess we saw over here on the cues. We're

1:23

now regaining bouncing off 595. And

1:26

we're also seeing a reduction in the VIX

1:29

down from 10% down to just 5%. And in

1:32

addition to that, a critical line to pay

1:34

attention to for bullishness right here

1:36

on AMD. you want to see AMD above 232 to

1:40

reiterate short-term enthusiasm.

1:43

Anyway, if you want all of those uh

1:46

alerts and insights and perspectives,

1:48

make sure you join the alpha report over

1:50

at meetke.com. So, let's look at some of

1:52

these reports that we're getting. So,

1:54

Bank of America is telling us, hey, fund

1:56

manager cash is so low. Is this bearish?

2:00

Well, yes, it is short-term bearish, but

2:02

it could create some short-term

2:04

opportunities. See, what you really need

2:06

is investor sentiment to kind of cool

2:08

off of this 9-month high that we've been

2:10

on. We've had now four days in a row of

2:13

red. We might end up going green towards

2:15

the end of the day today. We'll see.

2:16

We've got a nice bounce here at 595,

2:18

which is bullish. Uh you can join in on

2:21

that over at mecaven.com. You pay once,

2:23

you get lifetime access for it. So, we

2:25

think it's a great bargain. But anyway,

2:26

take a look at this. The fund manager

2:28

survey investor sentiment shows us at

2:30

9month highs. Usually when we come off

2:33

of these highs, we're able to create dip

2:35

by opportunities. Dip buy opportunities,

2:38

assuming we're not falling into a

2:40

recession. And obviously the biggest

2:43

factor that would elevate us into

2:45

recessionary concerns would be jobs. But

2:48

that ADP report this morning of -2500 uh

2:51

jobs on the 4-week moving average,

2:54

that's pretty close to zero, which is

2:57

probably where our break even employment

3:00

rate is right now. which is to say that

3:03

yes, immigration has really slowed down

3:05

the drivers of employment, but even

3:08

factoring in the joblessness that you

3:10

got announced from Target or Amazon or

3:13

some of the other layoffs we saw at the

3:14

end of October, we're not really that

3:17

far from zero. We're not falling off a

3:19

cliff, which is good. Which means maybe

3:22

this shortterm 4-day dip by dip we're

3:26

getting here is a dip by opportunity.

3:28

Maybe f people are finally going to

3:30

build up some cash again. This is a

3:33

great opportunity for people who have

3:34

already been building cash and staying

3:36

out of margin. Sentiment is pretty

3:38

elevated, at least according to the fund

3:39

manager survey. And this fund manager

3:41

survey was released today, so it's still

3:44

timely. You could see that here November

3:46

18th. Now, in terms of positioning

3:48

though, this is probably where you still

3:50

because I did also have a sell order

3:51

that I posted this morning is I'm

3:53

selling in one place and I'm

3:55

reallocating. Uh, and I'm still selling

3:58

a bit more on net than I'm buying mostly

4:02

because where I'm selling I've I've, you

4:04

know, that stock has returned over

4:06

probably 12x or actually I think it's

4:08

closer to 16x uh since I bought it in

4:11

22. But anyway, look at this. This is

4:13

positioning right now. investors are

4:15

bullish goldilocks with 53% of people

4:18

expecting a soft landing and 37

4:21

expecting no landing. Only 6% are

4:24

expecting a hard landing. So you don't

4:27

actually have a lot of investors in this

4:29

market pricing in a recession. I

4:31

actually don't think markets are pricing

4:33

in recession at all. What you're really

4:34

getting right now is a bit of a breather

4:37

of of sort of a a cash raise. That's

4:40

what you're seeing right here over the

4:42

last four or five days. Actually, I

4:44

mean, really, you've seen this all of

4:46

November, this slow bleed down. We've

4:49

had some more days in a row of red over

4:51

here, but you've seen this bleed down as

4:53

a way of raising cash, and some of that

4:56

is kind of normal. We see that cycle in

4:58

the market, but we're not by any means

5:00

seeing recessionary pricing in risk

5:03

assets at all. And it makes sense

5:05

because people are still bullish, soft

5:07

landing or no landing. Great. I'm still

5:10

50/50 on whether we're slow bleeding or

5:12

soft landing. But anyway, for the first

5:14

time in 20 years, investors are now

5:16

saying that there's a risk that

5:18

companies are overinvesting.

5:20

And the biggest concerns for market

5:23

investors right now, 45% say AI bubble

5:28

with the number one risk at 59%

5:32

being some form of private credit event.

5:35

This is beca, you know, following the

5:38

Black Rockck write down on their

5:39

renovation roll up, Renovo Homes, the

5:42

hotels like Sa Homes going bankrupt, way

5:45

upside down on their debts, the Ritz

5:47

Carlton developer going bankrupt after

5:49

getting rugpulled by their private

5:51

credit lender, thericolor bankruptcies,

5:53

the first brand's bankruptcies, the

5:55

failures of finance receivables auditing

5:57

at at PWC. Like, what the hell? Why

5:59

aren't the auditors catching this? the

6:02

reminiscence of what we're seeing with

6:04

oh everything's triple rated A+ we're

6:07

good here right but we're not actually

6:10

seeing the big four rating firms doing

6:13

most of the AAA rating right now most of

6:15

the ratings are actually in private

6:17

credit coming from or coming from

6:18

smaller firms who are maybe uh fudging

6:21

some of the ratings a little bit you

6:23

know it's why one of the reasons with

6:25

our um real estate startup we use the

6:28

highest standards for auditing PCAOB's

6:31

Like first brands didn't use that.

6:32

Tricolor didn't use that. X doesn't even

6:35

use that. Elon Musk's X doesn't even use

6:37

a PCAOB audit because you can kind of

6:41

get away with a little bit more. You

6:42

know, PCA level PCAOB those those are

6:45

those are pretty stringent audits. Uh

6:47

but but you know, most people aren't

6:49

going to do that because they don't want

6:50

that level of transparency and those are

6:52

the underlying risks and the market sees

6:54

that you know and that's that's all

6:56

driving some of the nervousness and

6:58

desire to raise cash. I think it's smart

7:01

to get out of debt, you know. Do you do

7:03

I think you have to run? Not

7:04

unnecessarily. But minimizing your

7:06

margin exposure, great. Long Mag 7

7:09

though being considered a crowded trade.

7:10

Now, what does JP Morgan have to say

7:13

about that? So JP Morgan actually has a

7:16

response about this long mag 7 being too

7:19

crowded, you know, argument. And I

7:22

actually think they did a good job here.

7:24

I will tell you out of this entire

7:26

report that we've gone through this 2026

7:28

report, they do a horrible job about

7:30

talking about the labor market. All they

7:33

do, and I feel like they're gaslighting

7:34

us. I don't really like JP Morgan. I

7:36

will give them credit where credit is

7:38

due. I like the Sapphire, but honestly,

7:40

I prefer the Venture X card. Uh, and I

7:43

think AMX has really lost the lead in

7:45

their travel cards. I don't think you

7:47

could trust JP Morgan as a bank. If

7:49

you're business banking with JP Morgan,

7:50

I think there's there's a real

7:53

likelihood you could get rugpulled at

7:54

the worst time. It doesn't matter to me.

7:56

I don't have any bank debt. My business

7:57

doesn't have any bank debt. Like, it

7:59

doesn't doesn't matter to us. I'm just

8:01

saying. I think be careful with with JP

8:02

Morgan. I don't trust them. Uh and and I

8:05

feel like there's while they do say some

8:07

things here that I think are valid, they

8:09

gaslight us on jobs. Basically in their

8:12

report all they do is they talk about,

8:14

"Hey guys, in the industrial revolution,

8:17

technology basically created jobs." So,

8:20

you know, AI's got to be good for jobs,

8:22

too. Yeah. No duh, bro. Yes, in the long

8:25

term, AI will create jobs. But I don't

8:27

care that AI is going to create jobs in

8:30

10 years from now. I'm worried about

8:32

what's happening over the next two years

8:34

because I don't want to go into an

8:35

unemployment recession. And JP Morgan,

8:37

you're not even addressing the weakness

8:39

in the labor market. In fact, you're

8:41

literally saying the opposite. We see

8:43

limited evidence that AI has impacted

8:45

the labor market yet. That's a red flag.

8:48

Mind you, they don't actually go down

8:50

that rabbit hole. They do not want to

8:52

they don't they do not want any of their

8:54

clients selling. And I think that's just

8:56

a bias you have to understand with JP

8:58

Morgan. They do not want their clients

9:00

selling. I mean, they literally go

9:03

bullish crypto. In this piece right

9:06

here, look at this. We note burgeoning

9:09

competition to the dollar from digital

9:11

operations such as cryptocurrency with

9:13

market cap of 4 trillion now exceeding

9:16

the two trillion at the start of 2024.

9:19

Investors are looking to crypto as a

9:20

potential store of value now with a more

9:23

friendly regulatory regime. It honestly,

9:26

it sounds like an ad. I I I feel like,

9:29

you know, Jamie Diamond's walking

9:30

through the office going, "Hey guys, we

9:32

can help you with crypto now, too. You

9:34

know, we've got bullish tailwinds for a

9:37

regulatory regime. Uh, you know what?

9:39

Blah blah blah." I mean, you get what

9:40

I'm trying to say. Like, it's it's a

9:42

very bullish sales pitch and it makes me

9:46

a little nervous that it's too bullish,

9:48

but primarily because they totally

9:51

ignore that jobs are weakening. There's

9:54

no question that jobs are weakening. No

9:57

question question there at all. The hope

9:59

and this is the hopeium. The hope is

10:01

that we can rebound, right? Is that we

10:05

can see job growth start booming again

10:07

and start picking up as we get through

10:09

the holidays and into January of next

10:11

year. Now, hopes don't always create the

10:14

best investment strategies, though.

10:17

Consider Home Depot and Six Flags. both

10:21

reported that they hoped that Q3 and Q4

10:25

would be better. Okay. Uh what ended up

10:29

happening? Well, what we ended up

10:31

getting was after Labor Day, Six Flags

10:36

told us demand trends are slowing and

10:38

they ended up telling us that the reason

10:40

traffic was down 11% was because of bad

10:42

weather. And then Home Depot's like,

10:45

"Yeah, you know, we actually had too

10:47

much good weather, so therefore people

10:49

didn't have to fix up their homes as

10:50

much, and that's why our sales are down,

10:52

and that's why we're reducing guidance."

10:54

I'm like, "Okay, fine. Maybe the weather

10:56

was not bad enough to drive sales at

10:58

Home Depot and not good enough to drive

11:00

sales at Six Flags, but the point is the

11:02

consumer suffering, right?" And JP

11:05

Morgan's kind of ignoring that whole

11:07

labor aspect because a good labor market

11:09

drives consumer spending, right?

11:12

Uh

11:13

so

11:15

with that said, let's look at actually

11:18

some of the components that I do think

11:20

they they provide fair points on. Okay,

11:23

so this is now the more bullish part.

11:25

Okay, they say that many of their

11:28

clients at JP Morgan are holding more

11:30

cash than they did before the pandemic.

11:32

And so I call this contrarian bullish,

11:35

right? Unlike the Bank of America fund

11:36

manager survey where where cash levels

11:38

are so low, this actually seems

11:40

contrarian bullish. This is bearish

11:42

right here, which is, you know, we're

11:44

capping out on AI model progress,

11:48

but they think that agents will take

11:50

over. I don't think so. I think we're

11:52

probably capping out on like the AI

11:54

chatbot encyclopedia progress, and now

11:57

it's just a matter of turning that into

11:59

revenues. That said, in fairness, I do

12:02

think they make some valid points. Right

12:05

now, if you compare AI spending today to

12:07

the.com bubble, we're only spending

12:09

around 1% of GDP right now. It's going

12:11

to increase. It's going to increase. In

12:14

my opinion, it's already going to like

12:16

plan to be closer to 4 to 5% of GDP. I

12:19

mean, think about GDP is about what 24

12:21

trillion. So 24 trillion times, call it

12:24

5%, that's about a trillion, 1.2

12:26

trillion a year. We're probably closer

12:28

to about 2.5% of GDP actually being

12:32

spent right now. You know, half a

12:33

trillion dollars a year, right? I mean,

12:35

look at Nvidia. They're going to

12:36

forecast half a trillion dollars of a

12:38

backlog when they report earnings soon,

12:40

which is when we're expiring the coupon

12:42

code for the meet Kevin Alpha report.

12:43

Coupon code is actually NVDA, Nvidia,

12:46

right? Their ticker symbol. But anyway,

12:48

they say current AI investment is around

12:50

uh 1%. They say that investment tends to

12:52

peak around 2 to 5% of GDP. Okay. Uh I

12:56

probably think we're somewhere around

12:58

two and a half right now, but we'll see.

13:00

And uh they also say that a lot of the

13:03

capex right now is still being driven by

13:06

earnings. And they're right like they do

13:10

rightly reference that there are bubbles

13:13

in history. Tulip mania, Japanese asset

13:15

bubbles, subprime mortgage crisis. But

13:19

in fairness, I didn't know this. I think

13:20

this is a good point. the Oracle, which

13:22

I wouldn't touch with a 10- foot pole.

13:24

Oracle was 5x overs subscribed for their

13:27

bond. That's crazy to me. Yesterday, you

13:30

had Amazon talk about a $15 billion uh

13:33

new bond subscription. Today, you had an

13:35

Azure uh and an anthropic announcement.

13:38

Like, these are big investments that are

13:40

still going on. And in fairness, they

13:42

are being driven by cash flows. They say

13:45

that right here. AI spending today is

13:47

fueled by cash flows. They are right

13:49

about that. Now those cash flows are

13:51

going to zero. Like you look at Amazon,

13:53

their free cash flow has is almost

13:55

indistinguishable indistinguishable from

13:57

zero now because they're investing so

13:58

much. But this is so much in contrast to

14:01

the bubble that you saw in the early era

14:03

where companies were going public with

14:05

no revenues and you weren't financing

14:08

the boom by cash flows, which you are

14:11

today. And so they make this really

14:13

interesting point. First, they point out

14:15

that if you look at the IPO market,

14:17

there's no sign of exuberance here. Like

14:20

IPOs recently have not been doing that

14:23

great. I mean, I was bearish on some of

14:26

I mean, a lot of these different IPOs,

14:28

but look at Circle for example. Circle

14:31

IPO skyrocket meme'd up tanks. Look at

14:35

another one here. If you go to Weeble,

14:38

dude, look at this bleed out on Weeble.

14:41

You know, not great. Some of these

14:43

recent IPOs have just been tanking. Not

14:46

great. Oo, Q's still recovering. Well,

14:48

glad bought the dip this morning. Um,

14:52

but, you know, that's potentially a sign

14:54

that maybe we're not at that euphoric

14:56

part of the Nike swoosh yet. Uh, you

14:59

know, Jeffrey Gondlock had a really good

15:00

point in an interview yesterday. He

15:02

said, you know, uh, he went bearish on

15:04

tech in 1999

15:07

and then the S&P 500 after he went

15:09

bearish rallied like another 80%. and

15:12

he's like, "Ah, well that doesn't look

15:13

good." Now, obviously ended up being

15:15

right to be bearish, but it it there is

15:17

a suggestion that maybe there's still a

15:19

bubble ahead of us, not behind us. And

15:21

that's what JP Morgan is arguing. See,

15:23

JP Morgan says here, "The biggest risk

15:25

to us is not having exposure." Now, I

15:28

have to be careful here. I feel like

15:30

this could be a Shamwow style sales

15:33

pitch. Okay? Now, don't get me wrong. I

15:36

like to pitch as well. We're going to

15:37

talk about real estate in just a moment.

15:39

And I love pitching my real estate

15:41

startup because y'all have invested like

15:43

$1.3 million in this company in November

15:48

alone. Okay, it's crazy. I mean, we're

15:51

offering a 5% yield. You get 100% upside

15:53

on the stock. Our valuation is based on

15:55

a valuation we did when our expenses

15:57

were way higher and we had no AI

15:59

product. That's what our valuation is

16:01

based off of. August 2024, no AI product

16:05

that, you know, we were thinking about

16:06

selling. uh and uh and and you know

16:09

expenses that were way higher. We cut a

16:11

lot of expenses and I feel like we're in

16:13

a really great place right now. We're

16:15

still offering that 5% yield. You get

16:17

100% of the upside. Obviously, you know,

16:18

read the offering circular. You can read

16:20

about our AI product as well that we're

16:22

going to be launching soon which is

16:24

really exciting at reinvest.co. Again,

16:26

read the disclosures. You can see the

16:28

real estate. We got to update this real

16:29

estate section with the new like 11

16:31

properties we just bought. I can't wait

16:33

to do that. But we're in the middle of

16:34

remodels on like 11 different fixer

16:36

uppers right now. It's crazy. We might

16:38

be up at 12 soon. I guess I'll know

16:40

later today. But anyway, uh you know, so

16:43

like I get it. Like there's a sales

16:44

pitch aspect that JP Morgan is doing as

16:47

well. Uh and

16:51

you kind of have to reconcile that here.

16:53

They don't want their clients to sell,

16:55

right? They don't want their clients to

16:56

sell out. Uh, so you know, like if I was

17:00

going to do a Gemini put together uh uh

17:03

Shamwow pitch,

17:06

Gemini says I should read the following.

17:09

Are you tired of market turbulence? Is

17:12

globalization leaving your portfolio wet

17:15

with risk?

17:17

Stop. You need the JP Morgan 2026

17:21

outlook. This report instantly soaks up

17:23

the three biggest threats. AI. The

17:26

massive boom is not a bubble. We tell

17:28

you where the trillion dollar value is

17:30

hiding. Fragmentation, forget sheep.

17:34

We'll show you huge profits in

17:37

nearshoring and inflation. Ha, cash

17:41

might be leaking value. So, get yourself

17:43

some real assets. So, don't let your

17:47

portfolio get wiped out. Check out the

17:49

JP Morgan 2026 outlook.

17:53

Gemini slap together that for me really

17:55

quickly. But I I like I I say that

17:58

half-heartedly because you have to know

18:01

you have to look at these JP Morgan

18:02

reports. I mean, look at this. They put

18:04

like a beautiful leather binder on this.

18:06

It's a sales pitch to some extent. Like,

18:08

please don't sell your assets, right?

18:10

All right. I get it. They're like the

18:12

biggest asset manager in the world. But

18:14

it is interesting to me because they

18:16

argue that the bubble could actually be

18:20

ahead of us. Look at this. When we

18:22

consider the evidence, it seems clear

18:24

that the ingredients for a market bubble

18:26

are present. That said, we think the

18:29

risk is that the bubble is in the

18:31

future,

18:33

not in the past. Kind of interesting.

18:37

So, what does JP Morgan recommend? Okay,

18:41

so JP Morgan does the following. This is

18:43

their strategy, and I've boiled this

18:45

down because I don't think they do a

18:46

really good job in their piece. So, I've

18:48

simplified this. Okay, I've simplified

18:50

to this mag 7 super micro computer and

18:54

infrastructure that's undervalued

18:56

relative to the others that are still

18:58

highly valued like avertive but still

19:00

they pitch water cooling then mag 7 and

19:03

then yolo into GPT or anthropic shares

19:06

and data bricks or the private market

19:08

that's roughly what they're saying here

19:10

now you could pause this and look at

19:11

this on screen but here they basically

19:12

say that Microsoft Meta Alphabet their

19:15

valuation premiums are justified in

19:17

fairness I kind of agree

19:19

that companies like Meta and even

19:21

Netflix, which I think Netflix will

19:23

benefit from a boom in advertising to

19:26

get these LLMs pitched. I actually think

19:29

those are cheap right now. That's just

19:30

my opinion, not personalized advice

19:32

obviously. But so they say they're

19:34

optimistic that these valuations are

19:35

justified. They're bullish on on these

19:38

various different plays. They also think

19:39

when I go to number three here, they

19:41

think that Google basically can compound

19:44

AI integrations a lot better than a lot

19:47

of other companies can because they're

19:48

so vertically integrated. Uh they're

19:50

kind of like that one-stop shop. Uh and

19:52

so when we looked at this the first

19:54

time, I made this analogy about how if I

19:56

go into my Google Drive, I could click

19:58

on our house hack offering circular and

20:00

I can click AI voiceover and they will

20:03

do a podcast to explain a PDF to me as a

20:07

podcast. It was crazy like I gave this

20:09

analogy because it we were looking at

20:10

this in office. We're like this is

20:12

really good. They have like this man and

20:13

a woman debating our offering circular.

20:16

Oh yeah. They they expect to make money

20:17

from these different verticals. One of

20:19

them for example buying what they call

20:21

wedge deals which which are undermarket

20:24

deals. And then they have like the lady

20:25

interject wedge deals. Yeah. Because

20:28

they think there's a wedge in the market

20:30

value of the properties they're buying.

20:31

And I'm like this is crazy, right? Like

20:34

so I get it. you know, they also say,

20:38

you know, so that's why they like the

20:39

Mag 7 still, even though there's a lot

20:41

of concentration risk there. Uh, but

20:44

they also think that there are

20:45

opportunities in other companies like

20:47

the AI enablers. I think some of the AI

20:50

enablers, you know, obviously the

20:51

Nvidia, the super micros, the vertips,

20:53

the mus, the microns, the MP materials

20:56

or whatever. Some of these are still

20:58

very highly valued. I think MP is a

21:00

little bit of a bubble. I think it can

21:01

have a short-term bounce, but I still

21:02

think it's going to trend to $31. So, I

21:04

I don't want to go long on MP material.

21:07

Uh I but I do think like a super micro

21:09

is probably less risky than betting on

21:11

the consumer right now, whether it's

21:12

Fun, Dave and Busters, Chipotle, Home

21:14

Depot, Target. You know, it's tempting

21:16

because they're getting cheap, but maybe

21:19

they're cheap for a reason, right?

21:21

Uh and then of course they talk about

21:22

private the private markets which you

21:24

want to always be careful with the

21:25

private markets because of the risk that

21:27

you know companies are really high in

21:29

debt which obviously is personally I'm

21:32

I'm obviously biased here why I like I'm

21:34

throwing more money at my own real

21:36

estate startup because I I'm like okay I

21:38

don't have the risk of debt at this

21:40

company. There's the company owns no

21:41

bank debt. Like it's massively uh uh

21:44

protected I feel like with with so much

21:46

real estate and cash in the bank. Uh so

21:49

I really like that. Plus, obviously, you

21:51

know, we're going to be releasing our AI

21:52

product, which some of you were happy in

21:54

the chat. I was talking about this.

21:55

We're going to release our super early

21:58

beta for the wedgeinder. We're going to

22:00

call it the reinvest AI, which will help

22:02

score kind of real estate for people to

22:04

prioritize when they go look to buy. And

22:06

because we think people will buy real

22:08

estate, you know, over the next 3 to 5

22:10

years, I kind of want to sell like right

22:13

now as we start the product a membership

22:15

that gives you access for like 3 to four

22:17

years at a really cheap base like basis

22:20

on a monthly basis. uh mostly because

22:22

that'll give us cash to really double

22:25

down on investing in the AI to make it

22:28

even better because we want to you know

22:30

not just value single families but then

22:32

value renovations how you could boost

22:33

your net worth do the valuation work for

22:36

you we're really excited about what we

22:38

could do with our AI but but anyway a

22:40

little tangential there so this is JP

22:42

Morgan's take here you know they still

22:45

believe throwing money at open AI SpaceX

22:47

anthropic data barracks or what like

22:49

these these private startups I get at uh

22:52

yeah I have a venture capital company

22:54

and we invested into uh this company

22:57

called Appronic and uh Apptronic's a

23:00

humanoid robot uh developer and I

23:03

visited them in I think it was 2023 and

23:06

I made an investment into them and then

23:08

my VC made an investment into them and

23:11

now Google backed upon and talks to

23:13

raise funding at $5 billion valuation.

23:15

If they pull off that $5 billion

23:16

valuation, I think I'm like 20x on my

23:19

first investment and like, you know,

23:20

probably three or 4x, depends what the

23:23

valuation and dilution ends up being on

23:25

the VC investment. It's pretty crazy.

23:28

But, uh, yeah, I mean, I get why JP

23:30

Morgan is talking about these private

23:31

opportunities because private companies,

23:34

you know, they can multiplex really

23:37

fast. Like, somebody left me a comment

23:39

yesterday. They're like, Kevin, all

23:41

these AI plays like Nvidia, they're

23:42

going to 5x in the next 5 years. And I'm

23:45

like, you think Nvidia is going to go

23:47

from a $5 trillion market cap to a $25

23:50

trillion market cap? Uh, that's crazy

23:55

because that's literally 100% of GDP.

23:58

Wow. I mean, I get you're bullish, but

24:01

wow. Like, I'm bullish to the sense that

24:04

like I'll I'll buy the dip on an

24:06

opportunity, right? Like I sent alerts

24:08

this morning. I'm like, "Hey guys, I'm

24:10

buying the dip on this. I'm buying some

24:13

of, you know, my 10-year play. Uh I'm

24:15

selling some that's not part of my

24:17

10-year play and, you know, I'm buying a

24:20

call option. Uh right, like that's in

24:23

our alpha report this morning. So, I get

24:27

it. But am I am I of this mindset of

24:29

like, oh gosh, all in 100% margin? No,

24:33

no,

24:34

>> no.

24:37

>> [laughter]

24:38

>> You know, if you look at, and this is

24:39

the sentiment right now you want to be

24:41

careful of. Look at this dude. I had a

24:43

guy I saw on Twitter yesterday on Axe.

24:46

He literally posted this uh he posts

24:49

deployed margin. F it. I'm either

24:51

working at McDonald's next year or I'll

24:53

be filthy rich. And apparently the guy

24:56

deployed margin on Robin Hood. And and

24:58

I'm like, we just hit the f it deployed

25:01

margin stage of the cycle. And I'm like,

25:03

dude, look at this. Like Robin Hood's

25:05

down 22% from peak, but it's had this

25:08

crazy run and the guy's yeing in on

25:11

margin at this point. Like great. Maybe

25:13

it'll work out today. I don't know. May

25:15

maybe hood's green today. It's not. It's

25:17

flat. Flat's better than than red. I

25:20

guess that's fine. Maybe it'll work out

25:22

day over day. But dude, you know, to to

25:26

yolo into margin when this is what the

25:28

week chart looks like. I don't know,

25:30

man.

25:31

uh you know it's it's not the kind of

25:33

risk aversion I like you know I like

25:36

being a little bit more careful. So

25:38

anyway something else that is wild about

25:40

JP Morgan is then of course they talk

25:42

about infrastructure they talk about uh

25:45

investing in oil and natural gas. Uh

25:47

they really like natural gas plays and

25:49

they think that uh natural gas plays are

25:52

really under allocated to right now.

25:55

They like crypto, but there's actually

25:58

something else. They talk about hedging

26:00

against inflation. Now, this is not a

26:02

surprise. You know, goods inflation

26:04

likely experienced some upward pressure

26:06

from tariffs. Services inflation seems

26:08

much more benign. Okay, they took that

26:09

right from the Federal Reserve's

26:11

playbook, right? But something else.

26:13

Look at this. I got really excited about

26:16

this. Now, I could be biased. Okay, your

26:19

house hack CEO here, reinvest. Okay,

26:23

maybe a little biased, but the US

26:26

housing market shortage. Let me just

26:27

read you their words. We estimate that

26:30

since the global financial crisis, the

26:32

United States has underbuilt houses by 3

26:34

to 4 million units relative to household

26:37

formation. Based on current trends, it

26:39

could take 10 years to close the gap.

26:41

But by the end of the decade, so in 5

26:43

years, over 6 million new people will

26:47

enter the 35 to 49 age group, which is

26:50

the prime age for home buying. Given the

26:53

extreme gap between the cost to rent and

26:55

the cost to buy, we expect demand for

26:58

rental housing to increase, especially

27:01

in newer homes suitable for families

27:03

within commuting distances for city

27:05

centers.

27:07

>> Bullish cataly bullish catalyst.

27:11

>> I like that. It's why I am investing and

27:14

plowing money into real estate.

27:16

>> I think that Kevin's a brilliant guy and

27:18

I think that we'd we'd we'd all be very

27:19

lucky to have him. Kevin's somebody

27:21

would consider you. Kevin is fantastic,

27:23

too.

27:24

>> Kevin is very talented, but I don't know

27:26

it's going to be him, but he's a very

27:27

talented guy.

27:28

>> But it's not just because of this rental

27:31

demand. It's also because they think

27:33

that real estate is a really good

27:35

inflation hedge. It's actually what I've

27:37

always loved about real estate is I see

27:39

real estate as an inflation hedge. I

27:41

don't care about currencies. I care

27:43

about the fact that so many people don't

27:45

want to deal with tenants and toilets,

27:47

but I do. I love toilets. I love rats. I

27:52

love dealing with mold. Maybe because

27:55

I'm insane. Fine. But somebody's got to

27:58

do it. Somebody's got to have the balls

28:00

to do it. The cool thing is if you

28:02

invest in house hack, I'll do it for

28:04

you. But anyway, so they say that to

28:07

identify to protect against longerterm

28:09

inflation, you can invest in

28:11

commodities. Specifically, they like

28:12

natural gas. Then they say real assets

28:15

such as infrastructure uh and real

28:18

estate. Okay, fine. Uh, so I like real

28:22

assets like house hack, but okay, I'm

28:25

biased again. But anyway, they say we

28:27

expect an acceleration in demand for

28:29

power driven by electrification. We

28:31

think people are underallocated to

28:33

natural gas specifically. They say they

28:36

think that real estate serves as a great

28:37

inflation hedge through rent escalators

28:39

and frequent lease resets and property

28:42

values rise with land labor costs and

28:44

material costs, which is good. They also

28:46

think that the multifamily

28:49

slump is bottoming out in those

28:51

overbuilt markets like Texas and Florida

28:54

and even the commercial sector they

28:56

think is bottoming out. So they think

28:58

this is a good trend for reshaping real

29:00

estate for years to come. Okay. And then

29:03

they look for, you know, basically stock

29:05

picking and how they think hedge funds

29:06

will do well and their bearish bonds.

29:09

Okay. Honestly, that was a really pretty

29:13

interesting JP Morgan piece. And I think

29:15

they totally are monkey see no evil on

29:18

recession

29:20

that like that's what JP Morgan is on

29:21

recession, right? Like they do not talk

29:23

at all about the jobs risk. But outside

29:26

of the labor market risk, I think it's

29:28

actually kind of interesting. You know,

29:30

I had somebody leave me a reasonable

29:31

comment the other day. They said, Kevin,

29:33

if we do have a labor market risk,

29:34

doesn't that create problems potentially

29:36

for rental housing? And the answer to

29:38

that that I used is based on what we saw

29:41

in 2008. We actually saw rental demand

29:45

increase during the great recession

29:47

after layoffs and specifically you see

29:50

it amongst higher credit households. So

29:53

we have very stringent credit score

29:55

standards to rent from us. So we really

29:58

vet our clients our our customers we

30:00

call them uh really well our tenants.

30:03

And we find that when people do lose

30:05

their jobs and they rent from us, they

30:08

move and they leave the property in

30:10

often better condition than we rented it

30:12

to them in and we just rent it to

30:14

somebody else. Uh or they have enough

30:16

cash reserves to go find another job. We

30:19

also find that rental demand usually

30:20

goes up in recessions, not down. More

30:23

people are renting because they're not

30:25

buying homes because they can't qualify

30:26

for a home even when rates are going

30:28

down. So we generally feel relatively

30:30

insulated when it comes to uh recessions

30:33

especially if you don't have callable

30:34

kind of bank debt right. Uh now of

30:37

course investor positioning you know who

30:38

is this? This was City Bank. City Bank

30:40

says that uh investor positioning is a

30:43

little mixed right now with some of the

30:45

bullishness on NASDAQ uh declining over

30:47

the last few days. I know we've seen

30:50

that. I think some of it's a little

30:52

overblown. It's why I think that 595

30:54

level has been a nice shelf for us which

30:56

is good. you know, we called that out in

30:58

the alpha report this morning. Did slip

31:00

a little bit below it, but I mean, now

31:02

we're riding it really nicely. So, I

31:03

think the buy the dip was well timed.

31:05

Uh, and um, you know, broadly, if we

31:09

don't have a recession, I think JP

31:10

Morgan, I hate to give them credit, but

31:13

I think they're probably right. The

31:15

vertical integration that you're seeing

31:17

uh, at some of the mag 7 is a valid

31:20

argument. Uh, I also think that the

31:22

advertising demand that you're going to

31:24

see at companies like Netflix is going

31:25

to blow up. And I think they're cheap. I

31:27

think actually Meta is a little on the

31:28

cheap side as well. And I think Meta and

31:30

and to some extent Google are going to

31:32

be big beneficiaries of this desire to

31:35

advertise AI products and to find new

31:38

customers. And I don't think you're

31:39

actually really seeing that priced into

31:41

markets right now. I'd like to say that

31:43

Tradeesk would be a beneficiary of the

31:45

advertising boom. I don't know that they

31:47

will be. I almost think that Pinterest

31:50

could be a better beneficiary, but

31:52

you're also heavily relying on the

31:53

consumer over there. So, so we'll see. a

31:56

little riskier place to get into. Uh,

31:58

you know, I mean, look at Pinterest.

31:59

Look at Pinterest stock. It's insane.

32:01

But their AI ads engine is pretty good.

32:04

And look at where they're sitting right

32:06

now. See this uptrend? This is a weak

32:08

chart. We're on this very long-term

32:11

uptrend right here that has been going

32:12

on for 5 years and we're bouncing off

32:16

the low portion of that uptrend. Kind of

32:19

tempting. We'll say kind of tempting. So

32:23

anyway,

32:25

hey, check out the alpha report. I think

32:28

JP Morgan's got a point on real estate,

32:31

on uh commodities, and the MAG 7. Some

32:34

of the private credit trades I think are

32:36

overvalued. I think SpaceX is getting

32:38

real competition here. I'm not the

32:40

biggest fan of what I'm seeing with

32:42

SpaceX uh uh you know, positioning.

32:46

But I'm also invested in SpaceX. I'm

32:48

just like, does it make sense to invest

32:50

more at this point? I don't know. I feel

32:52

like we're a little on the frothy side,

32:54

but hey, I know there's a lot of

32:55

enthusiasm around uh Elon Musk. Uh and

32:58

broadly, I think, you know, while it's a

33:00

relatively slow news day, everybody's

33:02

kind of twiddling their thumb to see if

33:04

we're going to end up getting uh uh you

33:07

know, a flip over here on on the shock

33:09

level of the 102 curve. Wow. We actually

33:12

saw live uh Donald Trump get uh get

33:16

asked by the ABC reporter over the

33:17

Epstein files. And apparently now Trump

33:19

is calling to revoke ABC's license for

33:21

asking an unflattering question.

33:23

Classic. [laughter]

33:26

Oh my goodness gracious. Anyway, uh

33:28

that's uh that's my take on what's going

33:30

on out there.

33:31

>> Why not advertise these [music] things

33:32

that you told us here? I feel like

33:33

nobody else knows about this.

33:35

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

33:36

see how it goes.

33:37

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

33:38

much. People love you. People look up to

33:40

you.

33:40

>> Kevin Papra there, financial analyst and

33:43

YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great to

33:44

get your take. [music]

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.