Imbalance and Liquidity Timeframes
FULL TRANSCRIPT
All right guys, welcome back. Like I
told you guys in the first video of this
particular series, I told you in this
video we will be so much interested in
the highest conclusive time frame what
it registers and the lowest conclusive
time frame what it registers. The
highest conclusive time frame registers
liquidity.
That's what register liquidity structure
of the market. Highest concrete time
frame why does it register liquidity?
Because when you want to register
liquidity you need less frequency. When
it comes to wave you know we see chart
as waves. Okay. So when it comes to wave
we need lesser frequency time frame and
lesser frequency time frames are the
highest conclusive time frame that is
higher time frames less frequency. Why?
For imbalance when it comes to imbalance
imbalance are more internal and more
intrinsic. Therefore, the lowest
conclusive time frame registers
imbalances. Okay? Because just let's
take an example. Let's take an example
of a big G wheel and a small G wheel.
Let's say the bigger J is rolling
clockwisely. The small G wheel is now
rolling anticlockwise.
Okay. Now, the smaller J that is rolling
anticlockwise
does not really visibly have a change.
sometimes or most of the times on the
direction of the bigger J. The bigger J
overall shows the direction and that is
why the biggest time frame in this
particular example show us our bias
through the true liquidity by
registering for us the true liquidity
that we actually need in the market. But
you see the small gear wheel for the
small G wheel even though you might say
that at times the anticlockwise movement
that it is moving does not lead to a
visible change in the whole J system but
however it is causing some inefficiency
by moving the opposite side. All right.
So that inefficiency is intrinsic. All
right. It is hidden and that is what can
register imbalances for us. So the
lowest conclusive time frame registers
imbalances but all of these just seem as
though I've just been talking. Why don't
you just let's get to the chart and
let's get to see what exactly I'm
talking about. Let's go. All right guys,
welcome back to class. How are you guys
doing? All right. So this is the chart
and we are basically interested in
talking about lowest conclusive time
frame registering imbalance and highest
conclusive time frame we say registers
liquidity.
Okay. Now we will be looking majorly
into daily participants, weekly monthly
participants that those are the major
focus of we interested in. We will not
be discussing about the sessional
participants because um those are
dynamic in nature and those will be
discussed later in the future. But for
now we are mostly interested in the
daily, weekly or monthly. So the first
thing to understand is that
a time frame the relative time frame
participant time frame cannot register
it own signal. That is daily time frame
cannot register daily participants.
Weekly time frame cannot register weekly
participants
and monthly cannot register month
participants. Yearly cannot register
yearly participants. Also for weekly,
monthly and yearly the highest time
frame we go to for them is daily
participants. And for daily participants
itself the highest time frame we go to
is the middle of it which is 12 hour
time frame.
Also when you are looking at time frames
the time frames you want to look at are
time frames that are divisible that is
that can go inside let's say I want to
register daily participants now time
frame that can go in u in daily itself
for example after 12 hour there's no
other time frame that can divide daily
with a remainder of zero daily is 24
hours you cannot use 16 hours you cannot
use 10
or any other time frame. Therefore, the
we go to to register for daily is to
check based on opposition rule. If you
are new to the channel and um you have
not seen opposition rule at least I've
released up to two videos extensively on
opposition rule. I believe everyone
watching this video should have updated
their knowledge of to position rule
because when we are saying highest
conclusive time frame or lowest
conclusive time frame we are saying that
one that is conclusive
not just any time frame time frame that
is where the new daily participants that
we want to register opens first as
opposite
to the time frame of the previous let's
say I want to register daily of the
previous day or if it is weekly let's
say the previous week closes as buyer
participant the time frame that first
show us that the new week opens as
seller that is opposite to the
participants that the previous week
closed has that's the time frame that we
say is conclusive in the first place so
that help us niche down time frames that
are relevant so the question now is
which is the highest. It can be 8 hour
time frame that will be the highest
conclusive time frame for daily. 12 hour
might not be conclusive at times. It can
be 6 hour time frame. It can even be 1
hour time frame that will be the highest
conclusive that is what that is the one
that will show us. Okay, this is trading
the participants that should be
registered for this particular day or
for this particular week. Same thing I
want to check weekly participant. It
doesn't matter whatever daily says the
question is daily even conclusive in the
first place. If daily is conclusive fine
daily will be the highest conclusive
time frame or if it is not it could also
be 12
or 4 or whichever time frame that is
actually conclusive. All right. So that
is majorly what it is. So based on a
position the highest and the lowest
conclusive time frame. So which means if
I want to check for imbalance structure
I start from the lowest time frame like
1 minute time frame 2 minutes 3 minutes
4 minutes 5 minutes is also divisible
then maybe 6 minutes then 10 minutes 20
minutes 24 minutes all right so like
that most times before you get to most
of this this thing you would have seen 1
minute at times might already be
conclusive and you already know okay
this is conclusive the time you used to
check your passive is not necessarily
the one that will conclude your
aggressor. The time frame that concludes
your passive is not necessarily the one
that concludes the aggressor. Of course
not. Then that one has no relationship.
Time frame are discrete but a single
time frame is not unique. There's no
universal time frame. That is why we
need a position. And then we now look at
okay for liquidity structure it must be
highest concive time frame that is
lowest frequency or low frequency time
frame and the ones you use to register
liquidity structure. Why high frequency
which are lower time frames? The lower
the time frame the higher the frequency
of such time frame. That is that's why
you see so many candles and so many
ranges on lower time frames. So that's
majorly
the fact all right that's the
mathematical fact that is exactly how it
should be done which means for example
this is a
weekly so if I want to register
uh if I want to register liquid
structure I start from the possible
highest conclusive time frame so this
low here is a weekly range
Okay, we apply the HR indicator. You to
the channel, you don't need to the
indicator. The indicator is just your
work and it's only available to private
students. We don't sell it to the public
because there's no point as many do not
know how to use it. This is not an
indicator lagging or this is just
something helping us to do faster what
we could have done manually. That's the
work of the indicator. So don't need to
text me that you want to buy indicator.
We don't set it alone. There's nothing
like that. All right. So very important.
So it's just every single thing the
indicator is doing. You guys already
know it from what I have taught you guys
so far. Okay. In fact, let me not even
use it. So let me hide it. So now this
is u same month same year what of
December same month and the month did
not flip within the range of this
passive and aggressor so since that
didn't happen same month same year so it
means that weekly but different week
actually so this the passive this eye
was formed on Thursday of the previous
week and this aggressor that is the mode
that this right formed on Wednesday of
the week after it. So two different
weeks entirely. So automatically we have
to look at the weekly relationship
either that means this loidity
or not liquidity. Okay. So practically I
want to register the weekly
participants. So I will start from daily
as you can see. And
so the question is where is Monday? One
question you might want to also ask me
is why am I saying we can't use weekly
to register monthly because most months
do not even start or many months do not
start on Monday that is when the week
starts so their participant do not
coincide but every single week every
single month every single year starts at
a certain day okay start on a certain
day so that is very important so that's
why really um gives us that balance for
all those other higher ones. Okay, so
this is Monday. So this is Monday here.
Closing range logic. Now like I said, if
you're new to the channel, watch the
2024 mentorship playlist. Um I might
change the name to 2025 or 2026. This is
2025 ends tomorrow. This is December 30,
2025. We thank God for life. So here
Monday opened
clear the eye first but does that mean
automatically this is double clause? Of
course not. But before I go to
concluding this that we need to check
the previous week and know if it is
negative that one open us before we can
say okay surely this is W plus but let's
check the new week first the week that
already the aggressor since we know this
previous week to W plus and mind when
using position the the the week you are
using or the day you are using to
conclude a new day or whatever does not
have to conclude that this does not have
to conclusive W plus on the time frame
you are saying the major thing is what
does it show you straight of W plus
because if you're saying that oh does it
mean this one too must surely be W plus
I must conclude it no the major thing is
if showing the loss on this time frame
that's discrete to it and so if the new
one open just exactly as this one did it
clear the low of this candle first of
this previous day first all right it
cleared the low first so that's W minus
so this new week is conclusive as
negative
These are that is the aggressor that is
this high. So it's conclusive as
negative. Okay, it's conclusive as
negative because it's higher time that
is why that is jumping the writing would
not be smooth there. Let me just mark
straight. So it is conclusive as
negative and that does not mean this is
conclusive and in fact we you don't need
to check this is conclusive before you
can conclude this as this one is
conclusive then on highest possible time
frame we can go to which is daily to
register with the participants
this is
negative sellers dominant
so the question now is the buyer this
one is showing us is it conclusive on
this time frame if not we go to a lower
time but we've already concluded this
one for liquidity structure. This is W
minus that we want to check is this low
liquidity or remember it is opposite
participants then that will make this to
be liquidity but if it is both sellers
sellers the B minus minus or buyer
buyers same participants then this low
is not a weekly liquidity.
All right. So let's go to to confirm
this we need to go to the previous week
before it. So the previous week before
it here is buyer too. So which means
this is not conclusive as buyer on this
time frame daily. So now we go to 12hour
time frame.
Okay we go to 12hour time frame on 12our
time frame the previous week before it
is still W plus buyer and this one too
also W plus. This these thick broken
lines are the weekly opens. So still not
conclusive on that time frame. So we go
to 8 hour because we're looking for
liquidity. We looking at liquid
structure that's why we started from
highest possible
conclusive time frame downward. But if
it is imbalance we start from the
lowest.
Okay. Um so here week is still buyer but
what does the previous week say? The
previous week is also still same buyer.
So it is not conclusive on it. All
right. So let's go to 6 hour time frame.
For 6 hour the indicator might not show
on 6 hour but you can trace it ourself.
So for 6 hour
this is Monday here
for 6 hour time frame.
Okay. So Monday here
this is a
bullish so let me activate. This is a
bullish candle that meaning that it
clear the high first.
All right. So on this hour time frame
this is a bullish candle. Sorry I said
bullish a bearish doy candle. Sorry a
bearish doy candle clears the eye first.
Always clear the high first.
That clear both high and low of the
previous candle. If it is bearish surely
clear the high first. If it is bullish
it means I clear the low first. So this
candle clears the eye first. So the week
is plus as you can see W plus. You can
see on the indicator lo simply means
buyer. We clear the high clear the low
made the target.
So the previous week before it here is
also still W plus. So it is not
conclusive on 6 hour. Then we go to
4hour time frame and on 4hour bravo we
now uh what we uh relatively
need to see remember
our let's check again do we miss
anything
our time frame this clear the high clear
the low because it's a bullish candle in
fact let's check it manually so that you
can understand let's mark the high and
low of the candle before it so I can
understand
that it's it did clear the
high.
So I can go to lower time frame. So that
range before it is this is it low and
this is it high. So you can see overall
this is the high this is the low or that
range before it will marked. Can see
overall it's clear the high first before
clearing the low on a lower time frame.
Okay. So, let's go back to 4our time
frame.
So, let's go back to 4our time frame.
So, on our 4hour time frame,
okay, on our 4hour time frame, what do
we see? We see a big gap here, which
means price gaps down first. So, that is
W minus first. A big gap in the open.
The price gapped down, cleared the low,
clear the high and this candle made two
more because it clear it go up and come
down. So it cleared the low, clear the
high, made the target flip to buyer. And
the previous week is W minus as you can
see it clear it clears the low first
because overall it didn't clear the high
at all. So clear this is the open candle
for that previous week 12 a.m. on the
futures chart. So that is minus minus
and
go to one hour time frame.
What's sorry this is not the open. So
what can we see on one hour time frame?
Same thing gap at the open right here.
It gaps down that is clear the low first
clear target to buy.
Okay. Now
going to the previous week before it.
This is where I will stop actually.
Okay. So, going to the previous week
before it
um Monday
12:00 a.m. clear the low first. So, they
are both sellers seller first. So,
that's also not conclusive. No matter
the time frame you not go for this
particular one, it is not conclusive.
Some have now asked the question, what
do we do if it is not conclusive? If
all is true, then all is true. What does
that mean in logic? No matter how you
output something, if it gives you a
certain participant, then that always
occur whenever there is huge gap like
this at the open. If there's no huge gap
at the open, surely a certain time frame
will conclude your signal for you. But
when you see gap like this, yes. So even
on highest time frames, [snorts]
this guy show us
buyer W plus and this one on daily W
minus. Even from daily like
independently without concluding and on
the lowest time frame where there is the
gap it's open as seller and all of them
to the lowest time frame possible you
can go to flipped to buyer here. So they
cleared the low clear the high made the
target flipped to buyer. So they opened
as minus made their three-way cycle and
then buyer and continued as buyer. So
which means conclusively this guy here
is buyer. So that is how we conclude
anyone that is not conclusive on any
time frame. If all is true then all is
true.
All right. So
I will still talk more on gaps in the
future. Just like this gap too. This is
a daily open gap during rollover. No
matter how you want to do this, you
don't even need to disturb yourself.
This is the gap so huge and price is not
not no time frame is it that price came
back to this low so surely this is a D
plus
I don't even need to use opposition R
here I hope that is clear so that is it
so this low right here is a weekly so I
intentionally use that technical one so
that I can give you guys the hint of
when you have you go to multiple time
frame and it's not conclusive
I intentionally use this example and
that's the only major example I will use
and for the imbalance you already know
the road as during the putting all
together I don't want this video to be
too long
you will see more practical but then in
the future too on my channel you will
see me using all of these major things
that I have taught here and as usual I
will see you guys on the profitable
side. So bye.
>> All right guys and that is exactly what
I have been talking about. I know by now
you guys are blown away by how you can
now get to see that okay these are
imbalances. Now you even understand
imbalances not with just using fear
value gap or just marking a random other
blocks and the likes but now you can
clearly see through the reasons or of
the things discussed in the video. All
right that imbalances can be seen with
your naked eyes. Okay. Now you have
gotten to see that your equal eyes equal
are not really your liquidity in quotes.
You have seen that liquidities are much
more objective. You can know that this
is a liquidity engineered by daily
participant. This is the one engineered
by weekly participants. And you now know
and understand that the imbalance that
is if I have daily liquidity then all I
have to go for is to go for the daily
imbalance which form either the demand
if I want to buy that is where daily
buyers actually rate daily sellers or
you can clearly now see that where daily
sellers now rate daily buyers. This
right here is the king. This is what you
have been missing in your trading. This
is why it seems as though you have just
been doing a lot of things randomly.
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.