TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Tesla to $24.33 & Epic Recession | Confronting Gordon Johnson

1h 49m 32s22,930 words3,243 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

welcome back to another episode of the

0:02

meet Kevin show from two days ago in New

0:04

York City with Kevin O'Leary to

0:06

yesterday with Gary black today we are

0:08

visiting who could potentially be the

0:11

most famous bear on CNBC and Twitter I

0:14

think it is going to be so enlightening

0:16

to have a discussion with you and uh I

0:19

am so excited to introduce Gordon

0:21

Johnson you have a research firm g l j

0:24

research and uh tell the world why are

0:28

you such a bear yeah thanks thanks for

0:30

coming uh it's a pleasure to meet you

0:33

um so essentially we're bearish right

0:36

now we're not structural Bears I hate

0:37

that we got that that moniker but

0:39

unfortunately that's what we have the

0:40

reason why we're bearish right now is

0:42

because we can get into this and we talk

0:44

about some of the other topics but you

0:46

know we've had essentially since 2009

0:48

we've had

0:49

um you know over a decade of

0:51

artificially low interest rates

0:54

um and we've had significant since covid

0:56

and even before covid quantitative

0:58

easing and we believe those macro

1:01

factors are shifting and we believe they

1:04

have to shift because what's happened is

1:06

inflation has now surged to a 40-year

1:08

high so the FED is kind of against their

1:11

back is against the wall and they have

1:13

to act to fight inflation because as

1:15

Charlie Munger said outside of nuclear

1:17

war inflation is the worst thing that

1:18

can happen so I think that the FED has

1:20

to act to fight that and I think that's

1:22

going to pull liquidity out of the

1:23

market I think that's going to be bad

1:24

for stocks that's the kind of overall

1:25

view why we're a bit more negative which

1:27

makes sense which is also why it looks

1:29

like uh you hit on Nick T this morning

1:32

that's the famous sort of fed mouthpiece

1:35

uh he seems to get the text messages

1:37

from Jerome Powell hey leak this or

1:39

whatever drone Powell seems to be really

1:41

interested in these moving averages of

1:43

what inflation is doing and Nick T this

1:45

morning mentioned that on a 12-month

1:47

annualized basis while 12 month year

1:49

over year we're at 4.6 inflation which I

1:51

know you have some comments on because

1:52

you tweeted it but what I did think was

1:55

interesting to your point is that

1:57

six-month annualized we're at four two

1:58

but three month where at four nine which

2:01

feels like we're seeing some

2:02

acceleration especially in that more

2:04

sticky travel Hospitality people

2:07

basically spending money on restaurants

2:08

right is is this going to become

2:11

unsustainable and is the Fed even able

2:14

or equipped to fight that kind of

2:15

inflation they're definitely equipped to

2:17

fight it and this is a great question

2:18

great setup

2:19

um so with respect to Nick T he does

2:21

great work I told him that I think the

2:23

issue is he's using seasonally a

2:25

seasonally adjusted index to make

2:27

observations on annualized numbers and

2:30

if you talk to the Bureau of Labor

2:31

Statistics they'll tell you you have to

2:33

use non-seasonally adjusted numbers

2:34

because you don't want those adjustments

2:36

and when you look at the non-seasonally

2:37

adjusted numbers specifically the index

2:40

not non-seasonally adjusted CPI over the

2:43

past roughly three months you've seen

2:44

literally it shoot up and in fact

2:47

inflation shoot up and in fact in 2021

2:50

if you look at the trend from about 1980

2:52

to 2020 it was a straight Trend and

2:54

there's a couple of periods 2000 2001

2:57

2007 and 2008 where kind of hockey stick

2:59

them in the moment right we went back

3:00

down sure it's hockey sticking again

3:02

that started in 2021 and I think again

3:05

the issue is all the stimulus money that

3:07

was printed so the problem is for uh the

3:10

deflation crowd is we're seeing a

3:12

Resurgence in inflation

3:14

um and in fact it's really resonating in

3:17

Services inflation which represents

3:18

about 70 70 of CPI Services inflation

3:22

when this in the CPI number uh was 7.1

3:25

percent in the most recent reading it

3:27

was down from 7.3 percent but I think

3:28

over the past uh roughly uh four

3:30

readings it's been above 77 we haven't

3:33

seen that since 1983. Services is the

3:36

sticky inflation that's really hard to

3:38

get under control so when you consider

3:39

that you consider that gas prices are

3:42

going back up right

3:43

um Energy prices are going back up what

3:45

happens with inflation is as we learned

3:48

in the 70s it rotates you know you see

3:50

it in Services you see it in uh car

3:53

prices then it rotates the energy then

3:54

it rotates somewhere else and when you

3:56

let that Genie out of the bottle as the

3:58

FED did I think you know know people say

4:00

the fed's going to make a mistake they

4:01

already made a mistake right the mistake

4:03

is 40-year high inflation right so when

4:06

you let that Genie out of the bottle

4:07

it's really hard to put back into the

4:09

bottle and you know I'm really concerned

4:11

and and again Nick does good work Nick T

4:14

um but he's using seasonally adjusted

4:15

numbers when he should be using

4:16

non-seasonally adjusted numbers when you

4:18

look at the NSA numbers the inflation

4:19

looks actually worse yeah that's

4:21

interesting because otherwise you're

4:22

comparing how seasonal adjustments have

4:25

changed so now then the question becomes

4:27

the you know we have all this mixed data

4:30

I mean diesel prices are plummeting

4:31

because of the freight recession but

4:33

gasoline prices are rising like you

4:34

mentioned it almost feels like what

4:36

you've described is this cancer of

4:38

inflation that it's here now it's gone

4:40

from there oh but now it's popping up

4:42

over here right it's like metastasizing

4:44

and showing up in different parts of the

4:45

body but my concern is with Services as

4:48

you've mentioned isn't there this

4:50

potential that the FED raises rates but

4:52

the people who are actually really

4:53

driving the services spending the

4:55

average American they don't necessarily

4:57

care about higher rates now maybe

4:59

that'll affect affect your credit cards

5:01

but if you're already in credit card

5:02

debt and you're already paying twenty

5:04

percent on your credit card who cares if

5:05

it's now 25 that really doesn't

5:08

marginally affect your ability to spend

5:09

or go on vacation because people are

5:11

living paycheck to paycheck yeah good

5:13

point so let's use history right yeah we

5:16

it's hard to predict the future in fact

5:18

it's impossible but our job is to try

5:20

you you're not sure so the issue is

5:23

every single time historically that CPI

5:26

inflation has gone above five percent it

5:29

didn't come back down again without

5:31

until not every session but until the

5:33

fed's funds rate went above CPI

5:35

inflation sure CPI inflation right now

5:37

is sitting at five percent right core

5:39

CPI inflation 5.6 the fat funds rate is

5:42

about 4 4.75 Powell had that prank call

5:45

yesterday and he said he's going to

5:46

raise rates two more times so

5:48

theoretically we're going to get to 5.25

5:49

but the problem is you don't just need

5:52

the FED funds rate historically using

5:54

history to go to where CPI is you needed

5:56

to go above CPI we're not there yet so I

5:58

think that his historically when the FED

6:01

raises rates it has allowed inflation to

6:04

come back down and let's be honest

6:05

really what the FED needs is they need a

6:08

recession um and that's not that's not

6:10

they don't want to admit that they and

6:11

he said that in the prank call yesterday

6:13

but they need growth to actually decline

6:15

they need jobs to be lost so you don't

6:17

have all this strength strong economic

6:19

growth I want to go to my notes Here

6:20

sure you know uh consumer spending so

6:22

consumer spending data came out recently

6:25

um it accounts for 70 of GDP uh 1q23

6:29

um it's surged by 3.7 percent that was

6:31

the biggest increase since 2021 during

6:33

the stimulus money bench um and then you

6:36

had government spending uh uh which

6:38

surged 4.7 that's a new record high so

6:41

consumers are spending like drunken

6:43

Sailors yeah despite the inflation we're

6:45

seeing and that is very bad data if

6:48

you're the FED um and if you're somebody

6:50

who is trying to fight this inflation

6:52

you know trying to make it by a normal

6:54

person you know we a lot of us talk

6:56

about the stock market but the

6:57

statistics suggests roughly 80 percent

6:59

of Americans are agnostic to what stocks

7:01

are doing right exactly so the problem

7:03

is the people who run things the people

7:06

who make decisions are so focused on the

7:07

stock market whereas the bulk of

7:09

Americans aren't I think that's why I

7:10

keep going back to this but I think it's

7:12

a great quote by Charlie Munger the only

7:14

thing worse than nuclear war is um

7:16

inflation and I think the reason is

7:18

because once that inflation gets to a

7:20

certain level we can look at you know

7:21

periods in history like the weirmware

7:23

Republic you know the collapse of Rome

7:25

the collapse of Greece all inflation

7:26

driven yeah um you know you start

7:28

basically people can't afford food and

7:30

they start to um you know uh basically

7:33

push back and when that happens you have

7:34

the fall of Empire so that's why we're

7:36

so focused on this topic on Twitter and

7:38

why we're so focused on it in our

7:39

analysis yeah now what's interesting is

7:42

the this consumer spend explosion seems

7:46

to be driven by you had mentioned

7:47

consumer spend for the first quarter up

7:49

3.7 seems to be driven by what last year

7:53

was a decline in people's personal

7:55

savings they were starting to go through

7:57

the excess savings they accrued during

7:59

the pandemic which gave them around

8:00

maybe on average two and a half times as

8:02

much cash as they previously had but

8:04

that had started declining in 2022

8:07

but now in q1 it started Rising again

8:09

right so this this idea that oh

8:12

eventually people are going to run out

8:14

of money

8:15

what when does that actually happening

8:18

great Point great point so I think

8:20

there's a dynamic happening and I don't

8:22

think a lot of people thought about this

8:23

think about this right so for the past

8:25

since Obama right the FED has been

8:28

artificially repressing interest rates

8:30

right I think a lot of people will agree

8:32

that they kept rates too low for too

8:33

long so think about this you know you

8:36

put your money at Chase and they're

8:38

giving you point

8:39

five percent on your money right you buy

8:42

a 10-year bond the 10-year bond was

8:44

yielding less than one percent for a

8:46

long time now all of a sudden you're

8:49

getting four percent on your savings

8:51

right every American not not just the

8:53

rich um you know you you buy a 10-year

8:55

bond

8:56

um you're getting five percent uh or now

8:58

it's 3.5 but not sure it was up to four

9:00

but you buy a one year bond you

9:02

understand it's way higher now the point

9:04

is there's a new source of income for

9:08

everyone that they haven't had for a

9:10

decade and that is interest rates being

9:12

higher higher rates are bad for people

9:15

like you and me who are investing in the

9:16

stock who are long stocks

9:19

but I know it's great for the average

9:22

American because now you actually get

9:24

paid on your savings so I think the

9:26

reason why you're seeing this strong

9:28

consumer spending is because interest

9:30

rates have went up to the point where

9:31

people feel more wealthy the problem is

9:34

again the FED needs to take interest

9:35

rates above CPI inflation so they're

9:39

they're fighting it but they're not

9:40

fighting it enough and as a result

9:41

people are outspending more I think

9:43

that's why banks have been strong so

9:44

that potentially could explain why we're

9:46

starting at least in these latest U of M

9:48

surveys on inflation expectations right

9:50

it seems like some of those expectations

9:52

are starting to rise we used to be at a

9:54

one-year expectation of around three six

9:56

two weeks ago and it just came out this

9:58

morning too I think it was four is above

10:00

four six so two weeks ago we were at

10:02

four six and it was a shocker that's the

10:04

preliminary read the final just came out

10:06

23 minutes ago and four six yeah so it

10:09

reiterates this this potential de

10:11

anchoring of inflation expectations

10:12

which suggests the FED has a lot more to

10:14

do right how high

10:17

um I I don't know but I think that you

10:21

know if I want to talk about this the

10:23

FED can we can we talk about this

10:24

absolutely just real quick so

10:26

look this may this may incense a lot of

10:28

people but I think this is the most

10:29

Reckless fed we've ever seen oh wow let

10:31

me explain so over the first 100 Years

10:34

of the U.S Federal Reserve Bank in the

10:36

United States their balance sheet grew

10:37

by roughly 1 billion I'm sorry one

10:39

trillion dollars it was about 974

10:42

billion that's that's the first 100

10:43

years right so when covid hit

10:47

initially their response was a two

10:49

trillion dollar monetary stimulus and

10:51

you know what we were looking at a black

10:53

hole right so I understand what they

10:55

were doing

10:56

but then when covet hit and we did 2

10:59

trillion six months into covet retail

11:02

sales were 15 above Trend yeah when the

11:05

growth when we had the global financial

11:06

crisis it took retail sales I think

11:08

eight years to get back to Trent yeah

11:10

um uh the the the the uh the 2001

11:13

collapse I think it took 12 years to get

11:15

back to Trent covid that recession it

11:18

took only six months and we fit 15 above

11:20

trade in addition we had vaccine

11:22

confirmation so after we were back to 15

11:25

above retail sales Trend and we had

11:27

vaccine confirmation they continued to

11:30

stimulate they did another two trillion

11:31

dollars that's 200 years of stimulus

11:34

they did in like two months that is

11:37

completely Reckless right and then they

11:39

said you know we're not going to

11:41

forecast when they were doing all the

11:42

stimulus and then as me and a lot of

11:44

other you know people who were

11:45

historians of the market were saying we

11:47

got the crazy inflation right and what's

11:50

crazy is they were essentially making a

11:52

like 30 to one bet on this right they

11:55

were trying to get so inflation you had

11:57

CPI inflation at 1.7 percent right they

12:00

were just trying to get to two percent

12:02

and to do that they were doing this

12:04

crazy stimulus now the problem is if

12:06

they lost on that bet it wasn't them who

12:08

lost right it's poor people it's I think

12:11

the stock market for the next 10 years I

12:13

think is going to be stagnated so wow my

12:15

point is these guys have proven to be

12:17

Reckless and be wrong with the

12:19

transitory comments Etc but then with

12:21

svb and I want to talk about yeah

12:22

hopefully we can get it to the bank

12:24

crisis but with SBB right you had a a

12:29

bank doing very bad things

12:31

um clearly other Banks had you know in

12:33

2022 had you know uh adjusted their uh

12:37

you know risk assets and duration to

12:38

match what the FED Fed was hinting they

12:40

were going to raise rates so you know

12:42

and and instead of letting them fail the

12:45

FED comes in in over two weeks that's

12:46

400 billion dollars of not QE we think

12:49

it's QE but so you know that's like you

12:52

know that's like 50 you know what was

12:53

that like 50 years of balance sheet

12:55

expansion in two weeks so you know this

12:58

isn't a an instance of you know courage

13:00

from Jerome Powell so I'm concerned and

13:03

we could talk about gold because I'm

13:04

concerned that when things get tough

13:06

he's not going to have

13:08

um the courage to stay the course on

13:10

fighting inflation and that could be

13:11

quite concerning oh wow I mean this is a

13:14

lot to unpack there I'm really really

13:15

insightful because you're right rates we

13:18

were printing over this last decade

13:20

before covid because as you said

13:22

inflation was running below Trend we

13:23

were at one seven uh and they were

13:25

trying to get us to two percent there

13:27

was even talk about lowering the

13:28

inflation Target which sounds insane

13:30

today but lowering the two percent

13:31

Target to 1.75 because they just

13:33

couldn't get it up right which makes the

13:36

question then that comes from that is is

13:38

that because of this 40-year

13:41

disinflationary trend of technology or

13:44

why did we see why were we able to print

13:47

so much money then and not see inflation

13:49

right uh and then of course we can talk

13:51

about the mistake of now that is a great

13:52

question I'm sorry I keep saying that

13:53

yeah so

13:54

the issue is there were two types of

13:57

inflation right you have inflation of

13:59

the monetary type and you have inflation

14:00

of the fiscal type right so with Obama

14:03

and through you know essentially until

14:06

we got to covid really what you had was

14:08

monetary inflation and that's the FED

14:10

essentially doing quantitative easing

14:12

right we we we did the you know the the

14:14

MBS bailouts we were supposed to bail

14:16

out the the housing market then they

14:17

just continued to do it so you say we

14:19

didn't see inflation but you did the

14:21

problem is you saw it in stocks and

14:23

homes house prices right that cancer

14:25

analogy somewhere else not to be

14:27

insensitive obviously you saw it in

14:30

stocks and houses right home prices have

14:32

went from I think an average of like 200

14:34

000 to like 400 000 now they're coming

14:35

back down but you know over that same

14:38

time frame minimum wage hasn't moved so

14:39

you've essentially priced an entire

14:41

generation you look very young you're

14:43

probably in that generation even you

14:44

price an entire generation out of the

14:46

ability to buy homes normal people right

14:48

the bulk of America it's not not the the

14:50

well-off

14:51

um so with covid right Congress got into

14:56

the mix and the Fed was extremely

14:58

Reckless they were doing all this

14:59

stimulus but Jerome Powell urged

15:01

Congress to join in sure so and keep in

15:03

mind right the U.S government can't do

15:06

stimulus without the FED printing so

15:08

people are blaming the US government and

15:10

they should but they can't do it unless

15:12

power prints that money out of thin air

15:14

so what you had is you had the fiscal

15:15

stimulus right you had literally uh

15:17

helicopter money being dropped with

15:18

people checks and so that's when you had

15:21

the inflation and everything else right

15:22

you just give people checks they're

15:24

going to go out and buy so that's when

15:25

you had the outside of homes and stocks

15:27

you started to see inflation everywhere

15:29

else and again once you let that Genie

15:31

out the bottle we've seen historically

15:33

it's extremely hard to put back in the

15:35

bottle so that's why I say and we can

15:37

talk about this more this is the most

15:38

Reckless fed we've ever seen wow I mean

15:40

that's fascinating because really you're

15:42

suggesting we've always had this

15:43

inflation during the QE regimes it's

15:46

just shown up in asset prices rather

15:48

than in nominal inflation for your

15:51

groceries or normal Services whereas now

15:53

we've had this massive acceleration in

15:57

in money printing during the covet era

15:58

which I I agree with you I mean looking

16:01

back if we had the vaccines approved

16:03

what five days after the election or so

16:05

November 9th of 2020 right around there

16:07

7th 9th

16:08

um why did we print until March of 2022

16:12

right when inflation was already six or

16:13

seven percent we were screaming

16:15

um via Twitter and however we could we

16:17

don't have the exposure you do that we

16:19

can't believe what the FED is doing and

16:21

you know people say well you're just

16:22

trying to support your short position I

16:24

care about America sure the issue is if

16:27

you look at any major crash of whether

16:30

it's it's an Empire or major crash in

16:32

the US economy it follows a bubble and

16:35

the FED has built via unnecessary you

16:39

know measures the biggest bubble in

16:41

essentially everything people have

16:43

referred to it as the everything buggle

16:44

bubble we've ever seen and you know what

16:47

a lot of bulls would say well what's

16:49

different right they've been doing this

16:50

since you know 2009 what's different

16:52

here's what's different right again I

16:54

think the people say the fed's gonna

16:56

blow something up I think they already

16:57

did blow something up and that is prices

16:59

40 year high inflation so the problem is

17:03

they've blown this bubble and you know

17:05

the fed's core goal is to keep prices

17:07

steady right that's essentially why the

17:09

Fed was created it's not even really

17:11

jobs the Fed was created central banks

17:13

were created to keep prices steady

17:14

clearly prices aren't steady so the

17:16

problem is they've blown these massive

17:18

Bubbles and now that we have 40-year

17:20

high inflation they have to fight it and

17:22

so as those bubbles Burst when bubbles

17:24

burst you have you know essentially

17:26

recession slash depressions and that's

17:28

kind of why I think people should be

17:29

concerned less scared yeah you refer a

17:33

few times now to almost comparing

17:35

America to potentially the Weimar

17:37

Republic or Empires collapsing is it

17:39

going to be that bad I hope not

17:41

um I don't think we're too far past uh

17:45

the pill but it really concerns me

17:49

um that what the FED did with svb doing

17:51

the 400 billion dollars of balance sheet

17:54

growth in two weeks uh because that

17:56

showed a lack of Courage

17:59

um a lack of willingness to fight

18:01

inflation

18:02

um so the concern I have is when the

18:04

going gets tough and the stock market

18:05

drops two percent I'm joking but yeah

18:07

you know you understand when anything

18:09

happens negative and I want to talk

18:11

about svb because those guys should have

18:13

been let to fill as in the depositors

18:15

would have been fine but when anything

18:16

bad happens I'm concerned this fed's

18:18

going to come in and do um you know just

18:20

massive stimulus again and that that

18:23

could lead to an even bigger collapse

18:25

later let's talk about that let's talk

18:26

about the banking crisis on stimulus

18:28

because I have to say I was uh really um

18:31

I found this picture very exciting that

18:33

you put on uh Twitter okay this uh this

18:37

right here your caption is uh in

18:40

medieval Spain Bankers who became

18:42

bankrupt were publicly disgraced by Town

18:45

authorities and given nothing nothing

18:48

but bread and water to eat until the

18:50

creditors were paid off right after a

18:52

year if the bankers fail to pay them

18:55

they would be beheaded and their

18:57

property and assets would be sold off

18:59

yeah I don't want to say I think Bankers

19:02

should be beheaded but I do think that

19:03

you know if you're able to make a lot of

19:07

money a lot of money doing bad things

19:09

you should also be able to be allowed to

19:11

fail let me let me talk about

19:13

essentially what happened um do you mind

19:14

if everything

19:16

um so so essentially what you had with

19:20

the failure of svb Signature Bank Credit

19:23

Suisse and any others it's the fault of

19:25

the FED for doing 14 years of interest

19:27

rate repression quantitative easing and

19:29

essentially turning the Banker's brains

19:30

into mush

19:32

um and what I mean by that is and you

19:36

also had Bank management for not taking

19:37

the fed's advice and preparing for

19:39

higher rates instead operating

19:40

recklessly in order to get you know

19:42

higher bonuses moving their stock prices

19:43

higher versus Brazil and Mexico by the

19:46

way who hiked rates sharply in December

19:49

2021. the Fed was telling you we're

19:51

about to start hiking rates what did

19:52

Brazil and Mexico do they hiked rates

19:54

significantly to prepare for that

19:56

um in December 2021 or the right thing

19:58

to do so you had svb signature your bank

20:00

credit Suites and others and who engaged

20:02

in stock pumping schemes to boost their

20:04

Equity prices which resulted in very

20:06

nefarious and likely illegal activities

20:08

keep in mind the at svb what they were

20:11

doing is offering below market rate

20:13

loans to startups who weren't making any

20:15

money right no earnings and the quid pro

20:17

quo was those startups had to keep their

20:20

cash at svb that's a bad business

20:22

practice right that's just that's just

20:24

nefarious business activity so when when

20:27

you when you get caught out there with

20:29

you you know when the tide goes out we

20:30

see who has a who's not wearing shorts

20:32

that's a Warren Buffett quote Yeah right

20:33

the tide went out they should have been

20:35

allowed to fail and keep in mind you

20:36

know everybody was talking about oh my

20:38

God the depositors these and we found

20:40

out later right it was like you know

20:42

guys who had billions of dollars so

20:43

these weren't you know small businesses

20:45

but also keep in mind

20:47

um that you know these depositors you

20:50

know would have been made whole right

20:52

the depositors that that next it

20:54

happened over the weekend that Monday

20:55

they would have been made whole 90 90

20:57

cents on the dollar right so this idea

20:59

that all these you know know small

21:01

businesses were going to lose money was

21:02

always wrong and when you when you bail

21:05

these guys out right when you allow

21:07

these guys to engage in nefarious and um

21:09

alleged credibly alleged illegal

21:11

activity

21:12

um you basically encourage moral hazard

21:15

so when you do that you essentially

21:16

encourage other Banks to do the same

21:19

thing so I think what Yellen did and

21:21

what what Powell did

21:23

um I think was bad and I think you know

21:25

it's all funded by the taxpayers you

21:27

know FDIC treasury et cetera the

21:29

government is funded by the taxpayers so

21:31

that's why I put that quote up because

21:32

you're not holding these people to

21:34

account and these people did extremely

21:36

very various things and we have we have

21:38

we have examples of banks who took the

21:41

fed's advice and raised rates you know

21:43

they they they change the duration of

21:45

their asset mismatch not just not just

21:48

Mexico and Brazil but also banks in the

21:49

U.S JP Morgan Bank of America et cetera

21:51

when these Banks didn't and and so these

21:54

Banks should be held to account I think

21:56

this is so fascinating because really

21:57

what you've suggested is that uh Jerome

22:00

Powell was weak in 2020 when we had the

22:04

vaccines we had retail sales above Trend

22:07

we had already won why continue to spend

22:10

money and now he's acting tough oh we're

22:13

going to stay higher for longer but as

22:14

soon as one thing goes wrong that's it

22:16

100 bailout of the banks essentially

22:18

right which was taxpayer backed uh

22:21

ultimately I think FDIC will end up

22:23

Distributing the 20 billion 22 billion

22:25

dollars of loss to other Banks right

22:27

really corporate socialism to some

22:28

extent which I think you've referred to

22:29

as well on Twitter so the question then

22:32

is if he was weak in 2020 if he's weak

22:35

now during the banking crisis

22:37

it sounds like you're thinking it's

22:39

going to be weak again and we're going

22:40

to see printing again and stimulus again

22:42

which potentially means inflation again

22:43

can you speak to that yeah so I I think

22:45

you you phrased it perfectly which is

22:47

why you know again everybody positions

22:49

us as bears but if you don't have faith

22:52

in your own power you don't have faith

22:53

in Joe Biden from a fiscal

22:55

responsibility perspective and they're

22:57

going to basically print which is going

22:59

to decrease the value of the dollar what

23:01

you want to do is you want to own gold

23:03

right if the dollar Falls in value gold

23:06

is going to increase not just gold but

23:08

other precious metals and potentially

23:10

other Commodities so that's why we're

23:12

bullish gold we own gold we like gold

23:15

um and I think it's because you have a

23:18

Fed chair and a U.S president who are

23:21

willing to spend hundreds of billions of

23:23

dollars in the face of 40-year higher

23:25

inflation which is extremely scary if

23:27

you love this country because again you

23:30

know every it's it's like every time I

23:32

talk about inflation these these guys on

23:34

Twitter who say you're just you know

23:36

talking up your Tesla position no study

23:38

economic history I went to school you

23:39

know I studied economic history um you

23:41

know I major in finance minor in

23:43

economics Morehouse College

23:45

um you know if you study economic

23:46

history inflation is extremely scary I

23:48

think Munger at over 90 years old he

23:50

knows what he's talking about

23:52

so do you think we're going to return to

23:54

stimulus checks then or how is that

23:56

inflation going to come back where's

23:57

this where's the weakness going to

23:59

manifest like how are we going to see it

24:00

right it's it's hard because if you look

24:03

at the history of inflation you know the

24:05

last time we had inflation like this was

24:06

in the 70s and what you've seen with CPI

24:09

it's like this right so you'll think you

24:11

got it under control then it rears its

24:13

ugly head you think you got it under

24:14

control it rears its ugly head and you

24:16

know everybody credits Paul volcker

24:18

rightfully so uh but if you remember

24:20

initially you know he didn't raise rates

24:23

enough at inflation 1980 and then you

24:25

had to come up again and then he had you

24:28

know at one point you had mortgage rates

24:30

at 15 you were able to invest in a bond

24:32

and get like you know 13

24:35

um so I don't know where we're headed

24:37

but I think that what is being done now

24:39

is not enough and I think that again you

24:42

know because rates were zero for so long

24:43

and now they're you know on certain

24:45

bonds you know one year you know six

24:47

month Bond you have near five percent

24:48

rates I think that's why you're seeing

24:50

an increase in spending because people

24:51

have more money on their savings and

24:53

they feel like they have our money and

24:54

they do but I don't think they're doing

24:56

enough and you can see that evidence by

24:57

the strong economic activity the strong

24:59

leg of Labor Market the CPI data today

25:02

the data we talk about the non-season

25:03

adjusted data which is now spiking back

25:05

higher

25:06

um so I I don't know what we need to do

25:08

but it's definitely more than what

25:09

they're doing and you know they have not

25:11

been a um a a a image of Courage if you

25:15

will

25:16

um uh with respect to some of these

25:17

issues we've had do you think the

25:18

depositor should have taken that 10

25:20

haircut you mentioned a quick reminder

25:22

to check out my wonderful programs on

25:24

building your wealth linked down below I

25:27

regularly add content to them I go live

25:29

every single day with course members

25:31

providing not only my commentary

25:33

financial analysis real estate analysis

25:36

but I answer your questions there are

25:39

multiple different Avenues you can check

25:41

out you could start with the zero to

25:43

millionaire real estate and the stocks

25:45

and psychology of money group phenomenal

25:47

Baseline knowledge to really build your

25:49

wealth check out the elite Hustlers

25:51

course to grow your income as an

25:54

entrepreneur making sure you're

25:55

negotiating those higher wages as an

25:58

employee or protecting yourself as a

26:00

business owner make sure you check out

26:02

the real estate agent course if you're

26:04

an agent a YouTube course if you want to

26:07

build your social media followings all

26:09

of those linked down below I would love

26:11

to see you as a course member soon we'll

26:14

also be doing free house visits to

26:17

random course members within the course

26:19

whoever wants to and we'll be exploring

26:21

what your financial Journey has looked

26:24

like check it all out link down below

26:26

absolutely absolutely I mean they would

26:28

have gotten that that day and then they

26:30

would have been made whole later

26:32

um but we now know that I think I think

26:34

it was like 10 depositors that had

26:36

billions of dollars so initially you

26:38

know like Circle was one of them I think

26:39

they had three billion dollars but the

26:42

point is it wasn't small you know

26:44

businesses that you know we're going to

26:46

see massive labor Cuts these were like

26:48

Silicon Valley billionaires who had you

26:50

know who essentially bailed out and

26:52

these were guys who knew what they were

26:53

doing like when you when you look at

26:54

some of these VCS on Twitter who talked

26:56

about some of the deals they got from

26:57

svb I mean it's crazy you know they were

27:00

getting below Market rates they were

27:01

getting like you know sweetheart deals

27:04

on mortgages Etc these are guys who not

27:06

who should not be bailed out and all of

27:08

a sudden it's the VCS and potentially

27:09

like the Gavin newsoms of the world who

27:11

were also a big voice in forcing this

27:14

essential backstop right right potential

27:16

conflict of interest it was just it's

27:18

it's infuriating when you think about it

27:21

if you understand what's going on I

27:22

think it's fascinating that you uh are

27:24

you you criticized Paul volcker

27:26

generally people don't go there uh

27:28

people seem to honor Paul volcker but

27:31

you mentioned that I mean he got in at

27:33

79 he had a recession in 80 because they

27:35

didn't raise rates even enough right and

27:38

that didn't tame the inflation that they

27:39

needed to raise rates again for starting

27:42

I think in October of 80. all the way

27:44

through 82 right to actually get

27:46

inflation under control so everybody

27:47

holds them up on a pedestal but even he

27:49

was not certain with what to do well no

27:52

I do hold him on a pedestal he he

27:55

he did something amazing he and keep in

27:58

mind at the time I think Carter was

27:59

behind him but there were a lot of

28:01

pundits out there and Congress both the

28:03

house and the Senate and you know TV

28:05

pundits Etc who positioned him as the

28:07

devil when he held his ground he is a

28:09

man to be revered he had the courage the

28:11

courage he had the courage so no I I I

28:13

just what I meant to say is initially he

28:15

didn't do it but he did it and he stuck

28:18

with it and he's a man that should be

28:20

revered because I think he saved America

28:21

from years of stress and if you look at

28:24

what this fed has done I mean think

28:26

about let me finish that thought if you

28:27

look what this fed has done it's the

28:29

opposite that think about this right

28:30

think about this think about it so Janet

28:32

Yellen right so in 2000 in 2021 2020

28:35

2021 right when the 10-year bond was

28:38

below one percent instead of issuing

28:41

debt to fund the U.S she was running

28:43

down the TGA now the problem is when you

28:46

run down the TGA not the problem the

28:48

benefit is if you're long stocks that's

28:49

like QE yeah um what we look at a lot of

28:52

people talk about the FED balance sheet

28:53

but you also have to look at the

28:54

treasury general account balance and the

28:56

reverse repo account balance when she

28:58

run down run down to TGA that's a way to

29:00

effectively stimulate the economy

29:03

you know the problem is she could have

29:05

issued that 10-year debt at below one

29:07

percent that was just Reckless it was

29:10

Reckless not to issue debt at those

29:11

numbers was Reckless enough it was

29:13

Reckless and you know so so so the last

29:16

time she ran down the TGA and then she

29:18

had to run it back up it was um I think

29:20

it was December 2021 to May of 2022

29:23

right she ran down to TGA she had to

29:25

refill it now keep in mind when she

29:27

refills the TGA what that means is she

29:29

has to issue debt into the market so

29:31

she's pulling liquidity out of the

29:32

market guess what happened December 2021

29:34

to May of 2022 s p down 17 and a half

29:37

percent right so now we're at a point

29:40

where right the TGA got all the way

29:42

below 100 billion right tax season we're

29:44

now at I think we're like 270 billion

29:46

she's doing about 50 billion of rundown

29:48

a week so that means she has about maybe

29:50

four or five weeks left before she runs

29:52

out of money so over the next month

29:54

she's gonna run out of money the debt

29:56

ceiling is going to be compromised and

29:57

then she's going to have to refill the

29:58

TGA right treasury general account

30:00

balance she's going to pull liquidity

30:01

out of the market where at the same time

30:02

the FED is doing QE last time she did

30:05

that s p fell 17 18 right right uh

30:08

correct yeah they're doing QT games

30:09

sorry correct sorry uh the FED is doing

30:11

quantitative tightening not quite but

30:13

the last time she did that right

30:15

the Fed was doing QE right the Fed was

30:17

you know pushing money to the market

30:19

stock market still fell 17.5 now she's

30:22

gonna have to do it and the fed's doing

30:23

QT right they're pulling money out of

30:26

the market so I don't know how much the

30:27

Market's going to fall but it's things

30:28

like this that I think some of our sell

30:31

side peers aren't focused on yeah and I

30:33

understand it but you have to be focused

30:34

on the macro in this environment oh yeah

30:36

absolutely yeah I think that's so

30:38

interesting the idea of refinancing or

30:39

having refinanced the debt lower reminds

30:41

me of I believe it was Donald Trump who

30:44

was saying we should take out 100 year

30:47

treasury bonds now because we could do

30:49

it for next to nothing right I mean now

30:52

in hindsight that would have looked like

30:54

a brilliant idea right he wasn't all bad

30:56

I don't want to get political at all but

30:59

um one thing I would say though is he

31:01

was pushing Powell to cut rates and I

31:04

think it was 2019 pal cut rates three

31:06

times with unemployment at a 50-year low

31:08

that was a huge mistake

31:10

um you don't do that when things are

31:12

going well you do that when things are

31:13

going bad so again another issue another

31:16

instance of him not having the courage

31:17

to do what's necessary the the right

31:20

Futures market right now seems to be

31:22

convinced that we're going to get around

31:23

two percentage points of cuts by

31:25

December January after maybe hitting

31:27

that peak of that 5.25 do you think

31:30

that's realistic or are we going to sit

31:32

at that flat line for a year yeah I

31:34

wanted to bet you a beer that's not

31:35

going to happen

31:36

I'm joking but no no absolutely a Bud

31:39

Light or like a like a Stella I don't

31:41

want to go there but

31:43

um what I'll say is you know you just

31:46

look at where inflation is you look at

31:48

the trends in inflation going up you

31:49

look at the strength in the jobs Market

31:52

you look at the strength in consumer

31:54

spending that we talked about the idea

31:56

that the FED is going to cut rates I

31:58

think is ludicrous

32:00

um and I think the rate Market will have

32:01

to adjust accordingly what Val said when

32:03

with the prank from zelinsk the faith

32:05

zielinski which we now know was real he

32:07

said we're going to raise rates two more

32:09

times and keep them there for a long

32:10

time look believe what he's saying like

32:12

I was a guy who fought pal right don't

32:14

fight the FED I fought him for a year

32:15

and I lost tremendously um look at Tesla

32:18

in 2020

32:19

um in 2021 I I fought them and I lost so

32:22

for guys who are saying we're gonna have

32:24

rate Cuts you're fighting what he's

32:25

telling you and I I don't think that's

32:26

smart I think you should believe what

32:27

he's saying and if you believe what he's

32:29

saying you know rates are going higher

32:30

is it possible and they're going to stay

32:32

there that the reason maybe people are

32:34

fighting that is the idea that the FED

32:37

can't today say that they're going to

32:39

cut rates in December because then

32:41

people will pull out dead and go right

32:43

back to spending and they'll reanimate

32:44

inflation and we truly won't get there

32:46

whereas if he pretends to have this hard

32:48

face uh we're gonna you know hire for

32:51

longer hire for longer and then we get

32:52

to December all right we're gonna you

32:54

know is is it an expectations game is he

32:58

playing with us because you actually

32:59

tweeted about how Jerome Powell seems to

33:02

be more transparent in this prankster

33:05

call right than he is with the American

33:07

people is he playing us I don't think

33:10

he's playing us I think but in the

33:12

prankster call he said what he's told us

33:14

right he said we're going to raise rates

33:16

he said in one minute what takes

33:18

probably 20 press conferences I agree I

33:21

agree I think they should stop with

33:22

these speeches but he but he kept with

33:24

what he's been telling us right he's

33:26

saying I'm going to raise rates and keep

33:27

them there he said that in the prankster

33:29

call so I don't think he's trying to

33:31

play us I think he's being honest and

33:32

let me tell you why so it's the data if

33:35

you look at Services inflation you know

33:37

uh Services inflation sitting at um hold

33:39

on let me see here so we got uh uh let's

33:42

see um core Services inflation right the

33:45

number that just came out core Services

33:47

inflation without Energy Services jumped

33:49

7.1 percent from a year ago in the most

33:51

recent reading um that's CPI okay the

33:54

core Services CPI I um and that was 7.3

33:57

in February so this was the fourth month

33:59

in a row of seven percent plus core

34:02

Services inflation it's the highest

34:03

we've seen since 1982. that has to be

34:06

scary to the fed you look at um Energy

34:08

prices which are going back up you look

34:10

at um uh core CPI which is sitting at

34:12

5.6 percent right their target is two

34:14

that's their measuring state so the

34:17

reason why I think he's serious is

34:19

because the numbers are too high the

34:21

numbers are sticky and they're not

34:22

coming lower so if he's serious about

34:25

fighting inflation which I think he is

34:26

then he has to do what he said he's

34:28

going to do and again he reiterated that

34:30

with the fake zielinski and that's the

34:31

hire for longer okay now uh PC this

34:34

morning uh those numbers I I want to say

34:37

I want to pull the the services uh

34:39

figures here it seemed like Services

34:41

came in at expectation core services and

34:44

we know pce runs lower just the way they

34:46

measure it right uh is it possible that

34:49

we really did peak in June of 2022 and

34:53

that yeah maybe it'll take longer to get

34:55

these numbers down whether it's CPI or

34:57

PC but in a year from now are we going

35:00

to be at two percent inflation are we

35:01

going to get it down I I hope so but the

35:04

data just doesn't support that right now

35:06

um again this Services inflation is

35:08

sticky you know core Services inflation

35:10

minus energy sticky at seven percent you

35:12

know that's a that's that's a that's

35:14

that's roughly 70 of CPI services and

35:17

it's not falling

35:19

um and you also have now Energy prices

35:21

going back up right Biden ran down the

35:23

spr right strategic Pro strategic

35:26

petroleum Reserve

35:28

um so what happens when we have to

35:30

refill that what happens if OPEC

35:32

continues to cut right we're going into

35:33

driving season oil prices but more

35:36

importantly gas prices which are have a

35:38

a hugely High correlation to the energy

35:41

component of CPI we did the math I think

35:43

it's around like 85 percent if you look

35:45

at just retail gas prices oh wow uh

35:47

against the um energy component of CPI

35:50

that the r squared correlation going

35:52

back multiple years is it's like 85

35:55

percent so as gas prices go up that

35:57

component in CPI is going to go up and

35:59

that's been a key driver of the downtick

36:01

right that's a way of saying you could

36:02

sort of see a leading indicator of what

36:05

CPI is going to be just by looking at

36:06

gas prices which have been coming up

36:08

right not to be confused with diesel

36:09

prices coming down but gas prices for

36:11

normal Americans going up if if any of

36:13

your viewers want to just do this

36:14

analysis it's very simple look at the

36:16

energy component of CPI on a monthly

36:18

basis go back about 10 years and then

36:20

track that against retail gas prices

36:22

which we get daily and you'll see that

36:24

the r squared correlation is nearly

36:25

perfect so the fact that those prices

36:27

are going back up has to be scary to the

36:29

FED if they're looking at this data I'm

36:30

sure they are so the idea that he's

36:32

going to quote unquote pivot I think is

36:35

it's it's it's I don't know a better

36:38

word than ridiculous I think it's it's

36:40

just not going to happen what about this

36:42

d dollarization uh you know we've lost

36:45

some clout in the Middle East

36:46

potentially a lot a lot of talk about

36:48

now uh Saudi Arabia and Iran partnering

36:52

and they used to be mortal enemies now

36:54

with deals negotiated by China right uh

36:56

are we losing uh the the strength that

37:00

we once had the soft power strength that

37:02

we had and our people respecting America

37:05

less and trying to move away to

37:07

different Alternatives or is this just

37:08

the same story we've heard before yeah

37:10

that's that's a great topic and

37:11

currencies is one of the hardest things

37:13

to predict um I I'm definitely not

37:15

better than anyone else out there but

37:17

what I'll say is I think there's two

37:19

different things to focus on here number

37:20

one dollar deal you know the idea that

37:22

we're going to move to some of the

37:23

reserve currency I think is ridiculous

37:25

um still I think roughly 60 of the

37:26

world's reserves are in US Dollars uh

37:28

the United States despite all its

37:30

problems is the most stable democracy in

37:31

the world

37:32

um you look at you know China where you

37:34

have a dictator who's running you know

37:36

labor camps and slaves and you know look

37:39

at what happened to Jack ma it's not a

37:41

real democracy you look at Russia I

37:42

don't think I even need to talk about

37:43

that they invaded a Sovereign Nation

37:46

um you think about some of these others

37:47

so I don't think there's risk of us

37:49

moving to another Reserve currency

37:51

anytime soon what I will say though is

37:53

if pow is reckless which scares me

37:56

um I think the value of the dollar could

37:58

decline significantly

38:00

um and if that happens you're going to

38:01

have inflation in the United States that

38:03

brings a lot of people to their knees if

38:05

they're not already there so wow I don't

38:06

think there's risk I I think that people

38:08

are just playing this is something we've

38:09

heard for years oh we're moving away

38:11

from a dollar just like the numbers

38:13

right reserves again US Dollars 60 our

38:17

democracy is the strongest you don't

38:18

have people you know um getting in boats

38:21

in the U.S trying to get into China you

38:22

do have people getting in boats in China

38:24

going through Mexico trying to get into

38:25

the U.S we're still the best and I I'm a

38:28

patriot so you know add that to this but

38:30

we we're still the strongest in the best

38:32

country in the world and that that has

38:34

that that psychology has a lot to do

38:36

with the strength of the dollar so I

38:37

don't think there's any risk of us

38:39

moving but I do think there's risk of

38:40

you know them printing a lot of money

38:42

and devaluing the dollar and if that

38:44

happens I think you will have a lot of

38:46

people here that are brought to their

38:47

knees and then it's true by the way

38:48

you're getting an awful lot of an

38:50

increase of Chinese Nationals coming in

38:52

through the Mexican border right very

38:54

interesting okay now we have to talk

38:56

about Tesla so when when are you going

39:00

long test do you own a Tesla I do not

39:02

have you ever driven it I'll show you

39:04

the cars I own okay I have I've driven

39:06

one uh I actually drove the

39:09

man this is a great story you won't

39:11

believe this okay so this was like 2000

39:14

I think it was nine or ten okay um and I

39:16

remember I forget the guy the IR guy's

39:18

name at Tesla but I was out doing like

39:20

um

39:22

I remember I so I was out doing like

39:25

some solar meetings in California and

39:27

the guy said you got to come to our

39:29

plant and he let me drive the Roadster

39:30

and it was like driving like a electric

39:32

go-kart oh yeah yeah it was really fast

39:34

and I went to their plant no there were

39:36

no cars being made and I was going to

39:39

initiate on the company with a buy I

39:40

swear this was that it was when it was

39:42

35 and you know 15 split ago yeah

39:48

and a couple of my clients were like if

39:50

you initiate on that stock with the buy

39:52

we're leaving

39:53

and it's not that it's not that I let

39:56

that influence me but yeah you know it

39:58

kind of influences so I said you know

39:59

what I'm just not going to touch it

40:01

um so that that's an interesting story

40:03

and it wasn't that I was extremely sold

40:05

I didn't even meet Elon it was just

40:07

I I just I was just like this is a new

40:10

product and you know people like me

40:11

products anyway so

40:13

to answer your question get back to your

40:14

question what what would get me to buy a

40:16

test look we have I think it's I think

40:17

the stock is worth 24.33 and I know that

40:20

sounds crazy but I'll you know I'll tell

40:22

you this when when tilray was at 300 I

40:24

think we had like a 40 Target people

40:25

said you're crazy

40:27

um with sun Edison which went bankrupt

40:29

um we had a buy rating at 30. they did

40:31

this deal with event and we took our our

40:33

30 price Target down to one dollar when

40:34

the stock was 19. people said you're

40:36

crazy

40:37

um in First Solar I remember this is

40:39

back in 2009 when the stock was like 230

40:41

dollars I think we had a forty dollar

40:43

price target people said you're crazy

40:44

look I think that's what the stock is

40:46

worth when it gets there we'll

40:47

reevaluate

40:49

um but I think there's a lot of issues

40:51

which we can get into

40:53

um and you know are you using sort of

40:54

the industry average multiples and no

40:56

we're using a um

40:58

I I actually think that the the numbers

41:00

we're using so to answer that we're

41:02

using a a 20-year DCF okay projecting

41:05

out cash flows discounting those cash

41:07

flows backwards or something

41:09

um uh we're using I think the the

41:11

discount rate we're using is around

41:12

eight percent yeah

41:14

um but so you know and what I'm saying

41:17

is the assumptions we have in our model

41:19

to get to 24 I think are pretty

41:22

aggressive

41:23

um what kind of volumes are you thinking

41:25

um I think we have them getting to like

41:27

10 million okay so you'll actually have

41:28

them getting to 10 mil right but your

41:30

DCF is still putting them at 24 today

41:32

correct that's scary right because the

41:35

thing is think about this right so Tesla

41:37

did what 73 cents um in q1 you you

41:41

multiply that by four and divide it into

41:43

the stock price today you're talking

41:44

about just under 60 times multiple right

41:47

the industry trades it seven times this

41:49

is for a company who effectively cut

41:52

prices roughly I think it was like 10 in

41:55

q1 yet solve volumes grow just four

41:57

percent right that means they're cutting

41:59

prices and they're not seeing the

42:01

elasticity think about this what if

42:03

Lamborghini cut their prices by 20 right

42:05

or forget about Lamborghini Porsche you

42:07

understand people will be running to the

42:09

dealership right if if that 200 000

42:11

Lamborghini people the elasticity would

42:14

be massive so the issue with Tesla is

42:16

very simple in our view

42:18

um you have a company who over the past

42:21

four quarters has produced more cars

42:23

than they've sold that's a record

42:25

um you have a company who's cutting

42:26

prices and you're not seeing the same

42:28

increase in unit volume that you're

42:31

seeing in price Cuts that's a big

42:32

problem you have a company who in our

42:35

view is the Blackberry of EVS I.E

42:38

they're the first guy out there but now

42:39

you have all these guys coming in with

42:41

cars that have equal or better Real

42:42

World Range better interiors and real

42:45

service ability

42:46

um and a long history of um you know

42:48

being able to make it you know Tesla's

42:50

never been through it's a frontier asset

42:52

essentially they've never been through a

42:54

full business cycle

42:55

um so I just think that there's

42:57

significantly more downside because you

42:59

have you know all this competition and

43:02

it's not necessarily Tesla's fault right

43:04

think about this right the cost of

43:06

capital right over the past three years

43:08

think about 2020 2021 early 2022. if you

43:11

said EV you could go raise billions of

43:13

dollars and create a car company out of

43:15

thin air but the demand the demand for

43:18

those cars increase right you have all

43:19

these new cars companies all these new

43:21

EV car companies but like is there is

43:23

the demand for are there more people to

43:25

buy the car so what I think is going to

43:26

happen we highlighted this last year is

43:28

inevitably you're going to have a price

43:29

War because it's just Supply demand if

43:31

you have more cars same amount of demand

43:33

you're going to have to cut your prices

43:34

to move those units and because Tesla's

43:37

the first guy in there they haven't

43:39

really invested in r d to you know come

43:41

with new models every car company you

43:43

know new models every one to two years

43:45

Tesla's essentially have the same models

43:47

since Inception

43:48

um uh and I think that's a problem so

43:50

you have all these issues you have the

43:52

issue with you know the specifically

43:54

Elon Musk around you know the full

43:56

self-driving he's been saying we're

43:57

gonna have full self driving next year

43:59

since 2014. you have you know

44:02

um you know all the things he's done you

44:03

know the fake solar panels he did to

44:05

sell SolarCity

44:06

um filing a 13d instead of a 13g clear

44:09

violation of Securities laws to acquire

44:12

Twitter the things he's done on Twitter

44:15

um you know forcing his workers back to

44:16

work in California at the height of the

44:18

covet crisis against a county order

44:21

um and and calling a hero a pedo and a

44:24

number of other things so I think that's

44:25

in uh you know uh upset if you will some

44:28

of his buyers

44:30

um and we've said this before in a lot

44:32

of instances you know having a Tesla car

44:34

now is analogous to wearing a red Mega

44:36

hat

44:37

um and I think that you know his core

44:38

constituency was you know on the liberal

44:42

side and I think now that he's kind of

44:44

whether it's true or not moved over to

44:46

the conservative side I think that's

44:47

hurt him too so there's a fundamental

44:49

aspect and then there there's a

44:51

quantitative aspect and there's a

44:52

qualitative aspect both I think are

44:54

working against them

44:56

and if you look at what's happening in

44:58

China I mean so so far this quarter we

45:00

just put our time in no doubt

45:02

um the the numbers came out early this

45:04

week you've had six votes go from China

45:06

to Europe last last quarter over the

45:08

first 26 days of the uh of the quarter

45:11

you had 13 votes so significant decline

45:13

in boats to China

45:14

um so the cells domestically in China

45:17

are better than they were last quarter

45:20

but they're not significantly better

45:21

despite the fact that you're not having

45:23

all those cars produced go to Europe

45:25

that's a big problem they're just not

45:27

selling the cars in China they need to

45:28

that also suggests the demand in Europe

45:30

is a week you saw today again they cut

45:32

the model y seven seater by another

45:34

thousand dollars that's the seventh

45:36

price cut in the U.S this quarter and

45:39

yet and still their inventories are

45:40

going up look this is just a company

45:42

that has too much capacity versus demand

45:44

I think they've reached saturation and

45:46

the competition is coming and coming

45:47

heavy

45:48

um so I think that you know I think our

45:50

price Target is going to prove accurate

45:51

when it hits our price Target we'll

45:52

reevaluate but you know we don't hate

45:55

Elon Musk or hate Tesla it's just we

45:57

think the stock is grossly overvalued

45:59

and when it gets valued accordingly we

46:01

will reevaluate but it's not a tech

46:03

company right they're last in FSD

46:06

um uh they're buying batteries from catl

46:08

and Panasonic all the promises they made

46:10

at battery day were essentially

46:12

mistruths we now know that the battery

46:14

has

46:15

um the 4680 battery they had they they

46:18

they made is actually worse from a

46:20

technological standpoint standpoint than

46:22

existing technology so they don't have

46:24

any technology either so I think once it

46:26

gets valued accordingly we'll reevaluate

46:28

have you tried FSD

46:30

I am scared to try FSD I have not I have

46:33

not and I've seen the videos and I know

46:35

I know every experience probably

46:36

probably isn't like that but I've been

46:38

in a pretty pretty uh the Dawn videos

46:41

the dawned uh I've been in a bad car

46:43

accident and I'm just once you once

46:46

you're in a car accident you're not

46:47

willing to risk your life for you know

46:48

technology

46:50

um what about

46:52

um which companies do you think are

46:54

beating Tesla in FSD or even regular

46:58

competition you mentioned Tesla might be

47:00

the Blackberry so which which other

47:02

companies yeah so guide house ranks um

47:04

uh uh uh uh autonomous driving

47:07

Technologies and they rank Tesla dead

47:09

last there's probably 20 companies they

47:11

rank if not more the ones they have at

47:14

the top are uh wamo and Cruz and

47:17

Mercedes and byd literally Tesla ranks

47:20

dead last So when you say which

47:21

companies are beating them in FSD

47:23

according to guide house who I trust

47:25

everyone

47:26

um with respect to cells right byd is

47:30

crushing them in China VW is beating

47:34

them in Europe

47:35

um and in the U.S we now know that over

47:37

the first two months of this year their

47:39

market share has fell from 75 last year

47:42

to 50 this year keep in mind GM's not

47:44

even really in the folds yet they're

47:45

coming with I think like 15 new EB

47:47

models this year it's not the GMS and

47:49

the Fords beating them and you know on

47:51

CNBC a lot of people like to say but

47:52

look at Lucid look at rivien I think

47:54

that's cherry picking the guys who are

47:56

beating them here are Toyota

47:58

um uh VW uh Mercedes

48:01

um you know Etc Hyundai those are the

48:04

guys who are taking share from Tesla and

48:06

beating them in the U.S

48:08

um so I think that you know the numbers

48:10

just tell the story

48:12

um and I think that you know with these

48:14

price cuts that aren't working I mean

48:16

the proof is in the pudding

48:18

Toyota's CEO recently said that they

48:22

believe they're part of the silent

48:23

majority of people who are interested in

48:25

hybrids instead of fully battery

48:27

electric vehicles

48:29

shortly after he said that in December

48:31

he uh announced his retirement and now

48:34

the new CEO is talking about moving to

48:36

All Battery electric vehicles and

48:38

they're talking about a new lineup of

48:40

bevs is potentially Tesla just early

48:44

here and these Legacy companies uh

48:48

realizing wow we actually have to catch

48:50

up with real battery electric products

48:51

where we really haven't yet yeah I I

48:54

think that again yeah I think they're I

48:55

think they were early I think they had a

48:57

first mover Advantage I think that when

48:59

we had the part shortage in 2020 and

49:01

2021 I think they were willing to cut

49:04

Corners that other people weren't uh

49:06

with respect to some of the chips they

49:07

qualified in within months where usually

49:09

it takes two years

49:10

Etc we highlighted all these issues

49:12

nobody seems to care but now you're

49:13

starting to see some of these cars I

49:15

think they have the most amount of their

49:16

their cars are recently ranked the most

49:18

likely to be recalled Consumer Reports

49:20

has Tesla ranked nearly dead lasts on uh

49:23

quality slash performance uh JD Power

49:25

the same what what question mark which

49:27

is a rating outfit in the UK the same

49:29

they rank Tesla's cars literally what

49:32

what question mark is dead last and

49:33

quality performance JD Power and

49:36

Consumer Reports either dead last or you

49:37

know second or third from last so you

49:40

know again this isn't me saying this

49:42

these are reputable you know rating

49:44

agencies who are saying these cars are

49:46

just not high quality so with the with

49:49

the new guys coming with all these

49:50

different EVS you're getting guys who

49:52

have done this for you know in some

49:53

cases a decade who you know can ease

49:56

think about let me finish that thought

49:58

who can easily you know go from

50:00

producing an ice car to producing um an

50:02

EV card think about this right so when

50:04

covet hit right Elon Musk was famous for

50:06

saying we're going to make ventilators

50:07

right we're going to repurpose our

50:08

Factory to make ventilators did he no he

50:11

didn't make one ventilator what he did

50:12

is he brought a couple of CPAP machines

50:14

slapped the Tesco Tesla logo on them

50:16

sent it to a hospital you know who did

50:18

repurpose their facilities Ford and GM

50:20

right

50:21

about this World War II right when we

50:23

needed tanks Ford

50:24

in just their facilities to make tanks

50:26

right these guys know what they're doing

50:28

and what's more important is the ICS I

50:30

see

50:31

Eternal internal combustion engine

50:33

manufacturers they make cars out of

50:36

profit they're ice cars right those cars

50:39

have profits on them they're losing

50:40

money on their EV cars and I would argue

50:42

that barring China Tesla might be losing

50:44

I don't think the Fremont Factory is

50:46

profitable I don't think the this is my

50:48

personal opinion I don't think the Texas

50:50

Factory's profitable I don't think

50:51

Germany's profit I think the profit is

50:53

in is in China and if you look at their

50:55

um you can't tell now with the 2022 10K

50:57

but in the 2021 10K you work the numbers

51:00

out they tell you the only profitable

51:02

facility is China why because they got a

51:04

sweetheart deal there because you're

51:05

able to you know I'm not saying Tesla's

51:07

doing this but in China you're able to

51:08

hire slave labor everything's cheaper so

51:11

you know the point is

51:14

you know outside of all the what I think

51:16

is

51:17

um uh accounting Shenanigans

51:19

um that is going on at Tesla

51:21

um the reality is they need to generate

51:23

cash and I think that you know this year

51:25

they have to pay taxes in China that

51:27

deal gets less and less sweet each year

51:30

um and I think that making EVS is not

51:32

profitable right now but I think the ice

51:34

can do that they can make these cars

51:37

unprofitably because they're they're

51:39

their their core constituency of selling

51:41

ice cars are profitable so they can use

51:43

that profit to invest in the uh the EV

51:45

space so I think that puts Tesla at a

51:48

disadvantage when a lot of people

51:48

thought Tesla was at an advantage so

51:51

what do you say to people who respond

51:52

and say well Chevy tried with the bolt

51:54

to have an EV and they just can to the

51:56

bolt right uh the it seems like they're

51:59

cutting jobs at Chevy Cruze uh their

52:02

autonomy division it seems like most

52:04

companies even byd are focused on let's

52:07

provide some simple Adas tools that we

52:10

know will work like uh Lane keep assist

52:12

something we can go to market with we

52:13

can bolt on but most industry reports

52:17

show that Legacy automakers have a ten

52:19

thousand dollar cost disadvantage in

52:21

making EVS compared to a Tesla right

52:23

when when does that switch are you

52:25

suggesting that the ice will catch up

52:26

and somehow they'll get that Advantage

52:28

back that's a great point so if you look

52:30

at Tesla's margins with the most recent

52:32

price Cuts you're talking probably about

52:34

18 17 to 18 margins that would put them

52:37

below most automakers all of a sudden

52:39

they're not the manufacturing leader

52:41

this is already happening

52:43

um and with respect to you know GM

52:45

canceling that car that's normal right

52:48

so they're replacing that with another

52:50

EV right you introduce new models I

52:52

think that's they're replacing it with

52:54

another low-cost EV so while while a lot

52:57

of Tesla you know fans and you know

52:59

Bulls come out and say hey look look

53:01

look at this

53:02

replacing it with another EV so I don't

53:04

think it's them getting out of the

53:05

business they're just they're just

53:07

basically updating the model and I think

53:09

with respect to cutting people look

53:11

people are struggling right I mean you

53:13

know the economy is not great despite

53:15

what you know some politicians may tell

53:17

you so it's not just you know the car

53:19

companies cutting employees right

53:21

there's a ton of tech companies cutting

53:22

employees uh you know uh there's job

53:25

Cuts being announced every day so I

53:26

don't think this is um specific to the

53:28

Auto industry I think it's a more

53:29

economic thing do you think that could

53:31

be potentially why Tesla doesn't have

53:33

that demand elasticity going back to one

53:35

of your original arguments that hey

53:37

you're reducing prices but it doesn't

53:38

seem like maybe we're getting as much

53:40

throughput while at the same time I

53:41

think you would agree they are ramping

53:43

production substantially right uh is

53:45

that maybe more macro if we were back at

53:47

uh you know you finance your car for 1.5

53:50

percent Tesla would be having wait lists

53:53

I think it's partially macro but you're

53:55

seeing tremendous growth from guys like

53:56

GM byd VW Hyundai Toyota

54:01

Etc and their EV sales their EV sales

54:03

are growing whereas Teslas are

54:04

stagnating despite significant price

54:06

Cuts so I do think there's a part of it

54:08

that's macro but I think there's a big

54:10

part of it that's I think Tesla has

54:13

saturated the market and I think that

54:15

people are saying let me look at

54:17

something else you know it's just

54:18

competition right you have you have a

54:21

ton more EV cars available you know

54:24

before it was just Tesla now you have

54:26

you know 10 20 30 options with EVs and I

54:29

think people are saying let me try this

54:30

other car let me try this other company

54:32

my service to Tesla was horrible

54:34

um you know my brother is um uh manages

54:36

a dealership in California he said

54:38

someone came in with their Tesla and

54:40

this is one person I don't want to say

54:41

this is everybody but he called me up

54:43

two days ago he's like call me back

54:44

immediately you got to call me and I was

54:46

busy I called the next day and I'm like

54:48

what's up and he's all excited um he's

54:50

like look you know people are bringing

54:51

in their Teslas and they're telling me

54:52

that like there's this scheme that Tesla

54:54

is doing where you know you lease a car

54:57

and you you can't buy it and then they

55:00

tell you you have to buy a car and then

55:02

you go to and then they tell you they're

55:03

bought they'll buy the lease back and

55:05

then you go to sell them the lease and

55:06

the price they told you they would give

55:08

you they cut it lower when you go to

55:09

sell it so he said there's been a number

55:11

people people that have come into His

55:12

dealership saying we want to trade in

55:13

our Tesla we'll never buy another one

55:15

because some of these schemes they're

55:16

doing and again I don't know if that's

55:18

widespread this is just you know a

55:19

couple of guys in California but you've

55:21

heard a number of things like this right

55:23

on Twitter I suppose I would say it's

55:25

very likely that anybody showing up at a

55:27

dealership with a Tesla does not like

55:29

Tesla so you probably have a

55:30

disproportionate share of unsatisfied

55:32

people right that's fair that's fair uh

55:34

but just the serviceability has been

55:36

extremely questionable

55:39

um you know and some of their tactics

55:40

just you know that we've seen have been

55:42

questionable but that's that's not the

55:43

bark of our thesis our thesis is

55:45

basically competition is going to come

55:47

in

55:48

um competition is going to crush them

55:50

because they're the Blackberry of the EV

55:52

space they're gonna have to cut prices

55:53

margins are going to get cut and people

55:55

are going to see this is just a car

55:56

company that's the Auto industry every

55:58

auto company outside of Ford and all the

56:00

new EV guys has went bankrupt why highly

56:02

Capital intenses extremely low margin

56:04

and I think Tesla has been able to Stave

56:06

that off because of a number of things I

56:09

think kova was the best thing that

56:10

happened to Tesla because you had all

56:12

this stimulus come in you had part

56:13

shortages and they were willing I think

56:15

to do things and other auto automotive

56:18

companies were not willing to do and I

56:19

think that brought them a couple of more

56:20

years but I think now we're getting back

56:22

to the mean level of what the Auto

56:24

industry is and I think that's extremely

56:26

low gross margins extremely high

56:28

competition and extremely Capital

56:29

intensive and that is not what Tesla's

56:31

stock is priced for now some say that

56:33

when it comes to Tesla Service there

56:36

potentially is virtually no service so

56:38

is that do you think that's then unique

56:40

to just all EVS or do you think Tesla

56:43

has a potential Advantage here no no I

56:45

think Tesla has horrible service I mean

56:47

that's that's what I mean pretty much

56:49

how are you evaluating that

56:51

um you don't own a Tesla right

56:54

um I don't own a Tesla thousands of

56:56

um entries into you know some of these

56:59

different online forms a number of

57:01

entries into

57:04

um you know Twitter that I've seen and

57:06

some of my friends who have owned Teslas

57:08

who have had minor you know one of my

57:10

friends he's a cult

57:12

um he loves Elon Musk he owns a Tesla

57:14

he's in in Florida and he brought I

57:16

think he brought the model S you know he

57:17

paid like I think 75 000 for this car

57:19

he's already had to take it in like

57:21

three times

57:23

um to get it serviced you know I brought

57:25

a 10 year old Porsche and I haven't had

57:27

to take it in once

57:29

um you know so and and when he takes it

57:32

in to get service it takes a long time

57:33

now he won't say anything bad about Elon

57:34

Musk but this is a real world this is my

57:36

buddy who's you know having these issues

57:38

um and I've heard similar issues from

57:39

other other people out there so

57:41

look

57:43

I'm not saying that I have the I know

57:46

everything on what's going on with

57:47

service but I think in general if you go

57:50

to Google and you type Tesla Service I

57:51

think the stories you'll see will be

57:53

quite bad and I think that's that's

57:55

causing demand in the U.S to waiver and

57:58

you're seeing that with respect to these

58:00

price cuts and despite these price Cuts

58:02

even today if you go and check their

58:03

inventories they're spiking higher

58:06

despite you know massive price Cuts so

58:08

it doesn't I don't I can't say exactly

58:11

what it is but something is causing

58:13

demand for Tesla cars to decline

58:15

significantly and again the stock is

58:18

just not priced for that you know this

58:19

you're talking about a stock that's

58:20

priced at Tesla is valid if you look at

58:23

their market cap I think right now it

58:24

used to be the next seven largest

58:25

automakers combined it's probably now

58:27

the last next five largest automakers

58:28

combined despite selling like just I

58:31

think four percent of the cars they do

58:32

so for that valuation it makes sense

58:35

they should be selling their quarter

58:37

over quarter growth should be

58:39

accelerating significantly they

58:41

shouldn't be cutting prices they should

58:42

be raising prices because if they're

58:44

worth more than the next five largest

58:46

automakers combined that means demand

58:48

for their cars should be astronomical it

58:50

should be in the stratosphere and we're

58:52

seeing the opposite of that is it

58:53

possible that you're comparing q1 to Q4

58:56

where generally in Q4 you have this Rush

58:58

of demand and a q1 you have the seasonal

59:01

decline in demands is that possible no

59:03

no because if you look at what happened

59:04

with again byd VW

59:07

um uh Toyota Hyundai Etc uh Neo leado I

59:11

can go on and on they all saw tremendous

59:13

growth Q4 not all but most of them saw

59:15

tremendous growth Q4 to q1 without the

59:17

price Cuts right you know last year when

59:20

Tesla was cutting prices BW was right

59:22

BYU was Raising prices in China you

59:24

understand so and they still sold a a

59:27

massive amount of cars right they saw

59:28

tremendous growth so this is clearly

59:31

looking at the data a specific issue

59:34

with Tesla

59:35

um and again you're talking about now

59:39

seven price Cuts in the U.S and if you

59:41

look at that and by the way the

59:43

inventory chart I'm talking about is I

59:44

think it's Matt Jung who keeps the data

59:47

he just Tesla only shows it's like so

59:49

for instance if they have like a hundred

59:51

red you know Model S long range cars in

59:54

inventory they only show one so that

59:56

inventory number that Matt Jung is

59:58

tracking which is going up is actually

59:59

worse than it appears

60:01

the service data to some extent it

60:04

sounds largely anecdotal to some degree

60:08

like how people as I started this

60:10

interview Define you as a bear right

60:12

right like anecdotally it seems like a

60:14

lot of your tweets are bearish uh so I

60:18

think I'm very embarrassed I think the

60:20

stock is grossly over but outside of

60:21

outside of Tesla as well I think you you

60:23

had some frustration in that your

60:25

reputation is of Despair but you're not

60:27

bearish everything you're one gold long

60:29

nuclear which we're going to talk about

60:30

is it possible that maybe the service

60:33

isn't that bad maybe maybe the the

60:35

anecdotes of oh I had to go in for

60:38

service but how did that how does that

60:39

compare to cars who that gets serviced

60:41

three times a year four times a year

60:43

regular ice Vehicles yeah whereas Teslas

60:45

maybe aren't getting service for a year

60:47

or more I mean I can give you anecdotes

60:49

on on the two Teslas that I own of maybe

60:51

in the lifespan of two cars over an

60:53

average ownership of four years I've

60:54

been at service four times right that's

60:56

an average of uh essentially once every

60:59

two years per car right

61:01

um sure it's it's definitely anecdotal

61:03

there's no doubt about it um but again

61:06

the core of our thesis isn't that

61:08

service is going to hurt Tesla or

61:10

Services What's going to bring them down

61:11

the core of our thesis is competition is

61:14

going to crush Tesla and I believe that

61:16

the data firmly shows that the

61:19

competition is crushing them

61:21

um and you're seeing that continue into

61:23

Q2 right six seven price Cuts in the U.S

61:27

um and you know inventory is still

61:29

building another price cut just today

61:32

um and the data out of China you know

61:34

again only six boats into Europe whereas

61:37

you had 13 last quarter and still

61:39

despite not sending you know over 50

61:41

drop in boats you're not seeing a surge

61:44

in China sells that's very concerning

61:46

this is just data so the data continues

61:49

to suggest that things are very bad for

61:50

Tesla um you know you have Elon Musk

61:53

telling you he's willing to sell car

61:54

think about this right he's telling you

61:56

he's willing to sell cars at break even

61:58

he's going to make up for it with FSD

62:00

right here's the problem

62:01

the FSD take rates have went from 40 to

62:05

5 only five percent of the people buying

62:07

Teslas are are buying FSD so how are you

62:10

going to make up for selling it doesn't

62:12

even make sense you understand so and I

62:14

know that's how you're referring to I

62:15

think uh part of that could be explained

62:17

by uh a higher International sale

62:19

through rate of Teslas where you can't

62:22

potentially buy FSD yet because of

62:24

regulatory challenges you know I was

62:26

looking at even in the US though the FSD

62:28

rates have collapsed and remain

62:29

collapsed I have to look at that but um

62:31

what's fascinating to me is this the

62:33

guide house insights chart that that you

62:36

uh refer to I brought it up and they

62:40

throw Tesla basically in the bottom

62:42

right and everybody else Baidu zukes

62:45

mobile I uh Aurora emotional Cruise

62:50

Nvidia waymu those are the leaders right

62:54

now their evaluation criteria

62:57

let me ask you what you think about this

62:59

they evaluate these based on the

63:01

following Vision that makes sense but

63:04

what about this go to market strategy

63:07

Partners production strategy sales

63:10

marketing and distribution commercial

63:12

Readiness those items in this evaluation

63:15

have a similar weight to actually

63:17

technology

63:19

of of the full self-driving and all of

63:22

the items here uh for a beta product are

63:25

very easy to anchor down is it possible

63:28

there's a massive amount of bias in in

63:30

these insights and would you consider

63:32

risking your life and trying out FSD

63:35

confronting Gordon Johnson and trying

63:38

FSD to actually no I would never try FSD

63:41

and again I've been in a very bad car

63:43

accident okay I've actually been in two

63:44

so given what I've seen what I've seen

63:47

FSD do by Tesla Fanboys right

63:50

um I would never risk my life no I would

63:53

not

63:54

um with respect to them being biased

63:55

look it's you know if they had Tesla

63:57

ranked number one I'm sure you wouldn't

63:59

say they're biased look you know he

64:01

removed a number of centimated okay he

64:04

removed a number of sensors he removed

64:05

radar right to save costs

64:08

um you know it's like you know FSD 2.0

64:12

FSD you know and it's like every single

64:14

one you even hear Fanboys saying you

64:16

know it's getting worse

64:18

um and this you don't have to take my

64:20

word for it just literally go online

64:21

type in FSD and and look at the videos

64:24

this you have cars turning into you know

64:26

Lanes running over kids and tests

64:29

um you have cars you know that are

64:31

running into you know restaurants cetera

64:33

I mean this is crazy stuff

64:35

tesladeaths.com you've had 19 according

64:38

to tesladeaths.com verified deaths

64:40

associated with autopilot being on these

64:42

cars are wrecking into fire trucks I

64:44

mean this is crazy stuff you know I

64:47

believe any other auto company this is

64:48

my opinion that had these issues would

64:50

immediately recall it and take it off

64:52

the road whereas it's with Tesla it's

64:54

been on the road since what 2016 2017.

64:57

in fact think about this how do you

64:58

trust FSD well we now know the painted

65:01

black video right the painted black

65:03

video from 2016 which is still on

65:05

Tesla's website last I checked

65:07

was completely doctored and and it was

65:10

directed by Elon Musk it was a video

65:11

over 3.5 minutes

65:14

um if you watch that video the start of

65:16

the video says the driver is only in the

65:18

seat for legal reasons right we now know

65:20

that his Engineers were not wanting him

65:22

to do that but he said let's put that in

65:23

there we now know that video was shot

65:25

over 550 miles there were multiple

65:28

disengage engagements the car wrecked

65:30

itself but if you watch that video

65:31

you'll think that Tesla car since 2016

65:34

can drive themselves that is extremely

65:36

Reckless and that that's the best way I

65:39

can put it so to put your trust in

65:41

someone who's willing to do that with a

65:43

video how is that different than Trevor

65:45

Milton rolling a truck down a hill how

65:47

is it different I I don't know right

65:48

nobody died is alleged to have died

65:51

because Trevor Milton rolled a truck

65:52

down the hill tesladeaths.com has 19

65:55

people and counting that have died

65:57

associated with you know Tesla's um uh

66:00

Automotive uh automated technology so I

66:03

think it's it's extremely Reckless what

66:04

he's done the reason why I would not

66:06

test it is because of things like that

66:08

and other mistrusts that Elon Musk has

66:10

said and if you watch the Hulu

66:12

documentary you have two former

66:14

employees saying yeah we left the

66:15

company because they were making you

66:17

know egregious claims associated with

66:19

FSD these are former Tesla employees so

66:21

no I wouldn't put my life at risk and

66:23

look we are factoring no legal liability

66:25

our working assumption is that Tesla is

66:27

above the law they will never have to be

66:29

if they go to court they'll always win

66:31

they'll never be prosecuted for any of

66:33

this

66:34

um uh or have to pay for any of this but

66:36

if you think about what's happening it's

66:37

it's a real dereliction of Duty from

66:39

Nitsa to allow this stuff to continue

66:41

he's testing beta technology that isn't

66:44

what he said it was in 2016 on the road

66:46

that has been alleged to have taken 19

66:48

lives I think that's that's pretty

66:51

compelling

66:52

is it possible that Tesla's haven't been

66:55

taken off the road because this 2016

66:57

video which let's agree that the claims

67:00

were substantially exaggerated in 2016.

67:02

that's now hold on seven years ago I

67:05

gave you a shot sorry sorry so seven

67:07

years ago uh we have this video that had

67:10

exaggerated claims let's agree with that

67:11

is it possible though that Teslas aren't

67:14

being taken off the road because the

67:15

accident rate per million miles driven

67:17

is five times fewer than a regular ice

67:19

right so that data from Tesla has been

67:21

thoroughly refuted and we now know it's

67:22

not true Nitsa actually Switched at the

67:25

2016 data or the a million miles the

67:27

million mile accident data we now know

67:29

that that data is completely I shouldn't

67:32

say completely but it's farcical because

67:34

it's comparing miles driven on the

67:37

highway to other cars where mile or

67:39

miles are driven in city it's like

67:40

you're preparing apples to oranges so to

67:42

use to continue to cite that data when

67:44

it's been thoroughly disproven I think

67:45

is misleading I'm not saying you're

67:47

misleading but anyone who who's doing

67:49

that is being extremely misleading so

67:51

it's not safer number one one and number

67:54

two I think the reason why it hasn't

67:55

been taken off the road is because I

67:56

think you've seen a dereliction of Duty

67:58

from Nitsa

67:59

um NS the NTSB has stated essentially

68:02

this stuff needs to be taken off the

68:04

road but they can't act they can only

68:06

make recommendations it's only Nitsa

68:07

that can act so and again this is all

68:10

our opinion but I believe that you the

68:12

reason why it hasn't been taken off the

68:13

road is because you've had a massive

68:14

direction of Duty and you know our

68:17

assumption is it'll never be taken off

68:18

the road that's our working assumption

68:19

uh because if it is you know our price

68:22

Target would probably move lower from

68:23

2433 right now so again I think that

68:26

what's happening is is scary

68:29

um and quite frankly when I see you know

68:31

given what my research and the years of

68:33

covering all this and the many mistruths

68:35

that have come out of Tesla around FSD

68:37

when I see it Tesla car on the road I

68:39

keep my distance uh because again you

68:41

know when you've been in an accident a

68:43

car accident you don't take any risks

68:45

so uh clearly you're disputing the the

68:48

data from Tesla and Nitsa which which is

68:51

this has been thoroughly debunked

68:54

um and and and Nitza I I think it's

68:56

either NTSB or Nitsa has agreed that

68:59

they were wrong in the way that they

69:00

conducted their study the Elon Musk he

69:02

uses that that that that the verbias

69:04

they use they get there was a I think it

69:05

was a New York Times article I'll send

69:07

it to you yeah

69:08

detailed that this this this this claim

69:12

that Tesla's making has been thoroughly

69:13

disbunked this came out like last year

69:15

so this idea that Tesla is safer has

69:17

been thoroughly debunked debunked I'm

69:19

sorry um and there was I think a New

69:21

York Times article on it yeah it seems

69:23

like recently in the last Q4 impact

69:25

report they're now reporting uh it now

69:28

in fairness it says mostly but they say

69:30

autopilot engaged mostly on highway

69:32

miles 0.18 million or accidents per

69:35

million miles uh mostly non-highway

69:38

miles 0.31 no active safety 0.68 and

69:42

then the U.S vehicle Fleet accident rate

69:44

at about about two to three times that

69:46

at 1.53 do you dispute that recent data

69:50

as well no I'd have to look into the

69:52

recent data um but I know that the claim

69:55

you're making with the million miles

69:56

driven and Tesla being the safest car on

69:58

the road that data has been thoroughly

69:59

debunked well you did you mentioned that

70:01

you were debunking because that was

70:03

mostly highway but now they're parsing

70:04

out even non-high right I I to be honest

70:07

with you I haven't looked into the most

70:08

recent data okay it's when I say I

70:10

haven't looked into it I don't know what

70:12

the uh the expert opinion is when I say

70:14

this has been debunked I'm not saying by

70:16

me I'm saying by the experts right so

70:18

I'd have to look at what the experts are

70:19

saying I I can't I can't speak to that

70:21

would would you say uh New York Times is

70:24

the accident I'll say this I do not

70:25

trust anything

70:27

I I shouldn't say that but I I'm I'm

70:29

highly

70:31

I'm highly highly

70:33

um uh distrustful of anything that comes

70:35

out of Tesla given given uh you know the

70:39

the painted black video given the 13d

70:40

instead of the 13g given he said he was

70:42

going to make ventilators he sent CPAP

70:44

machines given he said he was going to

70:45

fix the issue in Flint he didn't given

70:47

he called the guy a pedo given he said

70:49

he was going to have a million Robo

70:50

taxis on the road in 2020. given he

70:52

continues to tell people he has more

70:54

he's selling more cars than he's

70:55

producing where the past four quarters

70:57

he's produced more cars than he's sold I

70:59

can go on and on given you know early on

71:01

right the the the documentary now that

71:03

is on um uh it's on tuvi to be right we

71:07

now know that when he did that battery

71:08

swap to get the the tax credits in

71:10

California that was also doctored so

71:12

there's all these things that he's done

71:14

right that any sane person would say I

71:17

don't trust what this guy's saying so

71:20

I will say that I'm not going to say I

71:21

disbelieve it but I'm saying I need to

71:24

prove what he's saying before I'm

71:25

willing to believe it

71:27

sounds like you don't like Elon

71:29

no I'm not liking Elon it's just about

71:31

being a some of the story is maybe no

71:34

it's just about being a human being

71:35

right if somebody tells you for five

71:37

years in a row that two plus two is five

71:39

right and then you come to me and say

71:41

Hey you want this guy to do your math

71:42

problems for you I'm like no I don't

71:44

want that guy to do my math problems

71:45

right there have been a lot of mistruths

71:47

that this guy has said

71:49

the Tesla devs credibly alleges have

71:51

potentially led to death so you know

71:54

every car company has In fairness well

71:56

no not not every car company has said

71:58

not one car company has said our cars

72:01

are driving themselves the guy is in the

72:03

driver's seat only for legal reasons in

72:05

2016 and every year since essentially

72:07

2014 said we'll have full self-driving

72:10

better than humans on the road next year

72:12

nobody said that except for Tesla

72:14

probably the best thing on the FSD part

72:16

is for people to evaluate that

72:17

themselves I would imagine and I

72:19

understand that you've been in an

72:20

accident so you're unwilling uh to test

72:23

FSD I did though I want to pull up the

72:25

New York Times thing and I found it and

72:27

you're right they said these figures

72:30

always show that accidents are less

72:31

frequent with autopilot right a

72:33

collection of technologies that can

72:35

steer break and accelerate Tesla on its

72:37

own but the numbers are misleading

72:38

autopilot is used mainly for highway

72:40

driving which is generally twice as safe

72:42

as driving on city streets Tesla has not

72:44

provided data that would allow a

72:45

comparison of autopilot safety features

72:47

on the same kind of Roads neither have

72:50

any other car makers however now they

72:52

have and so I know you haven't looked at

72:53

the new data yet but it would be

72:55

interesting to the the question that I

72:57

want to frame out of this is is it

72:59

possible that yes Tesla may have made

73:01

mistakes in the past and and maybe

73:03

elon's been Reckless with his SCP SCC

73:05

filings is it possible they can fix

73:08

these in your in your mind no because to

73:11

get to level five

73:13

um autonomy you need lidar and radar and

73:16

Tesla does not have those who says that

73:18

well any experts you speak to in the

73:20

space

73:21

um we've spoken to I don't want to say

73:23

their names but we have a number of

73:25

um you know autonomous driving

73:26

technology experts we speak to I think

73:29

Tesla will never let me be very clear

73:31

this is our opinion I think Tesla will

73:33

never with its current technology get to

73:35

level 5 Adas it's impossible in our view

73:37

they need radar they need lidar and

73:40

they're talking about doing late radar

73:42

but they're not going to do lidar

73:43

without both of those I don't think it's

73:45

possible to get to what they claim that

73:46

they're going to get to very fair so one

73:50

thing that I want to bring up is you on

73:52

your website you have the uh your

73:54

research you were forecasting negative

73:56

free cash flow we didn't go negative but

73:59

it came in substantially lower than

74:00

expected right and earlier you mentioned

74:03

some potential accounting Shenanigans of

74:06

like potentially depreciating some of

74:07

their or capitalizing some of their

74:09

their Capital expenditures to to butter

74:12

out how much they're spending tell me

74:14

about their cash position because they

74:16

have had cash flow it's falling they're

74:17

spending money on these new Factories do

74:20

you think that if Tesla does go negative

74:21

free cash flow and cost of capital is

74:23

higher now that would be a big Catalyst

74:25

for the stock going down I think it

74:27

would be one Catalyst yes but I think

74:29

that and again when we say Shenanigans

74:32

these are our opinions

74:34

um there's

74:35

you know when you provide Gap accounting

74:37

statements there's a number of things

74:39

you need to be able to say definitively

74:42

we can't say that definitely these are

74:43

our opinions based on the fact that you

74:46

know in you know you know they're capex

74:50

right in the first quarter yeah was more

74:53

right in the first quarter of this year

74:54

they're not ramping any plants right

74:56

their capex is more than when they were

74:58

ramping two plants last year we have

75:01

questions around that Tesla will not

75:02

answer our calls they won't answer our

75:04

emails they never let us ask questions

75:05

or calls so we don't get our questions

75:07

as answers so we just have to wonder

75:09

um but with respect to the cash flow I

75:13

think that yeah if it's if it goes

75:15

negatively we think it is

75:17

um it's going to be bad keep in mind

75:18

right

75:19

if you look at their cash flow and you

75:21

take away the Zev credits they sold this

75:24

quarter it was negative it was negative

75:25

80 million first time I think since

75:28

um 2021.

75:30

um and keep in mind a lot of that is

75:32

because GM isn't selling EVS I think a

75:34

lot of the Zev credits that Tesla

75:35

continue to sell is to GM now GM is

75:37

about to start selling a lot of EVS

75:39

what's going to happen you know so I

75:40

think that's something to be concerned

75:42

about if you're a Tesla bull I don't

75:43

think people are focused on that so I

75:45

think there's a lot of risks around the

75:47

corner

75:49

um that I think a lot of people may be

75:50

overlooking but I think the most

75:52

important thing right now a lot with a

75:54

lot of bulls hang their hat on is unit

75:55

growth right and that's clearly what

75:57

Elon Musk is focused on another price

75:58

cut today

76:00

um so I think that he told you right he

76:02

told you on the call we're willing to go

76:04

to zero percent margins on our vehicles

76:05

and we're going to make up for it by

76:07

selling FSD again how are you going to

76:09

make up for that when you have five

76:10

percent attach rates but anyways

76:12

um you know a lot of things this guy

76:14

says doesn't make sense to us right he's

76:15

saying we have more demand than we can

76:17

make cars whereas they produce more cars

76:18

than they've sold more four quarters and

76:20

running a record that's never happened

76:21

so again I think that I think that um

76:24

you know cash flow I think is going to

76:26

turn negative but I think what people

76:27

are focused on is units but I think

76:28

people are going to be concerned about

76:29

the margins do you think it's possible

76:32

that uh Tesla could release a complete

76:36

Suite of full self-driving you already

76:38

said not level five but of let's say

76:40

level two and a half uh and and maybe

76:43

then start recognizing some of the FSD

76:46

Revenue well they've already recognized

76:47

significance amount significant amounts

76:49

haven't broken down how much they've

76:50

recognized something you're right they

76:52

break it down into the q's and K's

76:54

they've recognized significant amounts

76:55

of SSD Revenue keep in mind FSD is

76:59

vaporware it does not exist there is no

77:01

such thing as full self drive it is

77:03

vaporware that's a fancy way of saying

77:04

it's a product that doesn't exist the

77:06

fact that the FTC allows them to sell

77:07

this is a mystery to us

77:09

um but nonetheless it it's allowed so

77:11

but yeah so if they released you know

77:14

level two 2.0 right they've been doing

77:16

that every single what month for the

77:18

past five years right 1.1 version 1.6

77:22

whatever

77:23

um and you know even the Fanboys are

77:25

saying it's getting worse right if this

77:27

quote-unquote Dojo computer or this you

77:29

know the the arc invest thesis that

77:30

they're collecting millions of miles of

77:32

data which I think is completely farce

77:34

it's a complete farce I don't think

77:36

their cars are learning

77:38

again if you talk to The Experts this

77:40

has been disproven as well but you know

77:42

you're having the same issues

77:45

um at the same intersections Etc and

77:47

you're having new problems emerge so I

77:49

just think that you know FSD is

77:52

something that was used to you know

77:55

raise money and allow you know sell side

77:58

analysts to have these farcical you know

78:00

fan Fantastical price targets

78:03

um and we've said all along that it's

78:05

not what it's chalked up to be and we

78:07

said that the reason why we said that by

78:09

the way is because two years ago via a

78:11

Freedom of Information Act request there

78:14

were documents that came out between

78:15

Tesla's lawyers and I think the

78:16

California DMV were in that

78:19

communication right Tessa the lawyer

78:21

said our FSD our autonomous Drive is

78:25

level two and it will always be level

78:26

two that's what they said in those

78:28

documents right the problem was because

78:30

the stock was going up we were reporting

78:31

on that nobody cared they're like no no

78:33

you're wrong you're just a hater

78:35

um so look I think that you know this

78:38

FSD hope is something that can continue

78:40

to keep people you know engaged and

78:43

happy about the stock and hopeful and

78:45

that's great for Elon Musk and Tesla but

78:48

the reality is the competition has

78:50

passed them everyone according to guide

78:51

house and you know with their current

78:55

technology without lidar and radar and

78:57

taking sensors out they'll only ever be

79:00

level two so until he fundamentally

79:01

changes

79:03

um I don't think he's going to achieve

79:04

FSD and Elon Musk himself said if we

79:07

don't achieve FSD Tesla is a zero

79:09

dollars he said that I didn't say that

79:10

he said that I'm not saying that's our

79:12

belief right we have a 24.33 price

79:14

Target but you know more than zero hey

79:17

you're a bull yeah I mean but you know

79:20

you know if you put a 7 times multiple

79:23

you know you know earnings that are fair

79:26

that's not how we evaluate but sure you

79:28

you're talking about like a 20 stop so

79:30

you don't buy at all the Kathy Wood

79:32

Brett Whitten argument of let's price in

79:34

some degree

79:36

I don't want to speak ill but what I'll

79:39

say is

79:40

um you know

79:41

we we had a debate I think we debated

79:44

her it was it was a Montana skeptic and

79:46

I debated her

79:48

um at the Robin Hood conference I think

79:49

it was in 2018. I got Robin Hood socks

79:51

on nice they were free I love the

79:53

conference those are nice socks

79:55

um so but you know her thesis then was

79:57

Robo taxis it's all Robo taxis you know

79:59

in 2019 you know they're going to be

80:02

doing billions of dollars of Revenue

80:03

they haven't done one there's not one

80:05

Robo taxi on the road so she got lucky

80:08

in our view glj researches view because

80:11

of covet hit you had you know all this

80:13

massive amount of money that was dumped

80:14

into the market and every stock went up

80:16

right AMC went up uh you know every

80:19

stock went up Tesla was the leader of

80:20

the Mims and because the stock price

80:22

went up you know it was like her thesis

80:25

was validated even though her thesis has

80:26

been 100 incorrect if you look at her

80:29

Tesla Model it's riddled with holes and

80:32

mistakes and when these mistakes are

80:33

pointed out as we recently did on

80:35

Twitter we get no response from Brett

80:37

and Kathy or Tasha

80:39

um and this isn't talking ill of them

80:41

I'm just saying like you know we make a

80:43

small mistake right we got the cash flow

80:45

number wrong you highlighted that she

80:47

says they're gonna have like 2 million

80:49

Robo taxes on the road there's not one

80:50

and yet nobody talks about it so

80:53

um you know I think that you know her

80:56

models are I think incorrect um I can

80:59

tell you where she's made huge mistakes

81:02

um and I think that you know when you go

81:04

out and you say you know pre-split she

81:07

said it was a two thousand dollar stock

81:08

now post split she said it's a two

81:10

thousand dollar stock right and you put

81:12

these Fantastical price targets out

81:14

there you attract attention and you know

81:17

so you think maybe it's more marketing

81:18

than I think so I think so because

81:20

selling a Sizzle before the stake well I

81:23

mean just think about it right I mean

81:25

her bear case is like what like uh 500

81:28

upside

81:29

um so it's just it's not realistic and

81:32

but you know when think about it

81:34

Kathleen would if you had if you ran a

81:36

hedge fund right look at what her

81:37

performance over the past two years and

81:39

you had that performance you'd be out of

81:40

business she's she's breaking the dough

81:42

in right because she can say we're going

81:45

to grow 50 or whatever her number was

81:46

it's like 50 every year and people get

81:49

excited and give her money and then she

81:51

charges an exorbitant management fee and

81:52

whether she's right or wrong she makes

81:54

money so I think that the marketing is a

81:56

big part of it um and it's unfortunate

81:58

because those people could be allocating

82:00

their money the money manager money

82:02

managers who are performing which I

82:04

think would benefit them two more Tesla

82:06

questions and then we'll move on

82:08

um you tweeted that when people find out

82:11

in 10 years the battery is dead by the

82:13

way with your you know Emoji here uh

82:17

that in 10 years when the battery is

82:19

dead the replacement cost is thirty to

82:22

fifty thousand dollars right where did

82:24

you get that that number that was wrong

82:26

that was wrong I think the replacement

82:27

cost is around ten to fifteen thousand

82:28

dollars okay

82:29

um so yeah sometimes we're not we're not

82:32

100 accurate in our tweets but the point

82:34

is you know

82:36

this is another thing we saw on Twitter

82:38

like there's Tesla there's used Tesla

82:40

cars uh let me know you say that because

82:42

I forget the exact point but the point

82:43

is like

82:44

a used EV is not worth as much as a used

82:48

ice my my car right is Gonna Last me

82:52

you know it's 10 years old it's going to

82:53

ask me another it's a Porsche um It's

82:55

Gonna Last me another 20 years right if

82:57

I wanted to if I take care of it you

82:59

know your your EV car that battery when

83:02

it when it goes out you're gonna have to

83:04

replace that that's a replacement cost

83:05

of 10 to 15 000 right you and me that

83:09

that's fine right you more than me

83:10

probably but we can afford that but you

83:13

know the average American cannot so

83:15

forcing an American you know forcing an

83:17

American to take an EV without them

83:19

understanding that cost but more

83:21

importantly once these cars are used and

83:23

that knowledge is widespread and well

83:25

known the used value of EVS is going to

83:27

collapse and that will hurt the new

83:29

cells of EVS so that's that's the point

83:31

we were trying to make last point on

83:33

Tesla because you're very clear on Tesla

83:35

right but the last point you mentioned

83:37

that they haven't come out with new

83:39

models cyber truck right

83:42

I mean so you know right think about

83:44

this right so when they did the Cyber

83:46

truck launch right what is it like three

83:47

or four years delayed now so when they

83:49

did the Cyber truck launch they were

83:50

saying it's going to be a 40 000 truck

83:51

right we'll see if that's right I think

83:53

it's probably gonna be double that price

83:55

I personally think it's not that great

83:57

looking uh given the issues they've had

83:59

with their cars I think the specs are

84:01

going to be significantly different the

84:03

price the range Etc are going to be

84:04

significantly different than what

84:06

they've promised so I can't predict the

84:08

future but what I can say is when they

84:10

when they announce that truck we said

84:12

the day they announced it there's no way

84:14

it's going to be that price and it's

84:15

going to be delayed and we were right

84:17

um so we'll see what happens but I think

84:19

that you know this this idea that they

84:21

have all these orders and that all these

84:22

people are going to buy that truck

84:24

I think it's going to be significantly

84:26

underwhelm

84:27

um so we'll see what happens

84:29

next topic you talk about housing bursts

84:33

2.0 yeah what do you think we've seen

84:35

housing prices fall from about May to

84:37

December uh Nationwide average around 10

84:40

some areas uh have been you know the

84:42

Phoenix's have been more like 20 Austin

84:46

um how is that going to affect this

84:47

economy that's a great question so you

84:50

know

84:51

we're currently renting

84:53

um but you think about it right a lot of

84:56

the spending patterns in the US are

84:58

driven by housing and more importantly

85:00

how much you think your house is worth

85:01

or how much it's worth so we've seen

85:04

housing prices fall for the first time

85:06

you know annual annual housing prices

85:08

fall for the first time in a long time

85:10

right mortgage rates are up the price

85:12

the cost of a house is up significantly

85:14

why why is it though because the FED

85:16

brought mortgage-backed Securities and

85:18

they never stopped since 2009. that

85:20

literally they're printing money out of

85:21

thin air and buying houses that's the

85:23

way to think about that that is unfair

85:25

to young people who are trying to buy

85:27

houses right it's great for people like

85:28

you and me who not me anymore but who

85:31

you I used to own a house great for us

85:33

because our asset value goes up sure but

85:34

this is artificially boosting the price

85:36

of houses now you have mortgage rates

85:38

you know 30-year fixed mortgage rates

85:40

that were what two percent under three

85:42

percent not that long ago now you're

85:43

talking about just under seven it's just

85:45

it's just a matter of math it's just

85:46

more expensive to have a house so what

85:48

happens is it's more expensive to have a

85:50

house right

85:52

um people are making literally the same

85:54

amount of money mortgages are more

85:56

expensive so you're going to have less

85:58

demand so what I think has happened is

86:01

and this is proven in the data you have

86:03

a lot of people during the housing boom

86:05

that brought second third fourth homes

86:06

as Investments and I think right now

86:09

they're keeping those houses off the

86:10

market because they think we're going to

86:13

go back to the euphoric period but if

86:15

you think about the last housing bus

86:16

right 2007-8 what happened was the

86:19

decline in prices started in the East

86:21

right you're talking about places like

86:23

you know Florida

86:26

um you know basically the east coast and

86:29

then the people in the west didn't see

86:30

it they say hey we're going to be fine

86:31

it's not going to hit us and then it hit

86:32

them slowly worked its way true now it

86:35

started on the west and I think it's

86:36

going to work its way to the east

86:37

interesting and I think it's just math

86:39

it's just that it's more expensive and

86:41

you have this less demand

86:43

um and as prices start to fall right

86:45

from Peak to trough I think San Fran's

86:47

down like what like I think 16 a lot of

86:49

the places are down you know a little

86:51

less a little more than that on the west

86:53

um and those declines are starting to

86:54

pick up so I think what's going to

86:56

happen is you know prices price decline

86:58

is going to start to fall more

87:00

and once those people who are holding

87:02

that inventory off the market put that

87:03

inventory back onto the market that's

87:05

what happened in the global financial

87:06

crisis

87:07

if there's like 3.5 units if they put

87:09

just like I think 10 of that 20 of that

87:12

this is all the vacant properties not

87:13

fake uh it's it's it's properties it's

87:16

not even necessarily vacant it's just

87:18

properties that are being held off

87:19

Market okay for whatever reason correct

87:21

like you know let's say you own three

87:22

houses right and you clearly you're not

87:24

saying in all of them maybe you're

87:25

renting a couple out it doesn't matter

87:27

but you're not putting them on the

87:29

market because you think prices are too

87:30

low right but let's say you're in I

87:32

don't know you're in Phoenix and all of

87:34

a sudden prices are down 10 now they're

87:36

down 20 you start to panic what happened

87:38

in the global financial crisis

87:40

people started to put those houses on

87:41

the market right more Supply same demand

87:44

prices fall yeah more Supply saying

87:46

demand prices collapse oh yeah so I

87:47

think that what that is what could

87:49

potentially happen I don't know if

87:50

that's gonna happen but that's what the

87:52

data is suggesting and if that happens

87:53

how does it affect the economy when your

87:56

price when you're the how the value of

87:58

your price the value of your house Falls

87:59

right in your mind and rightfully so

88:02

your wealth Falls and when your wealth

88:04

Falls you stop spending as much and when

88:05

you stop spending as much the economy as

88:07

effective the wealth effect of course so

88:08

you think a big risk to real estate

88:10

right now is the potential collab or the

88:12

rise of inventory because right now we

88:14

have very shallow inventory in fact the

88:17

first quarter much like we saw a very

88:19

seasonably warm January which led to

88:21

retail sales blowing up potentially due

88:23

to seasonal adjustments as well we've

88:25

seen some markets take up again in the

88:27

first three quarters will that flip-flop

88:30

back down when inventory Rises if

88:32

inventory Rises right so I think I think

88:33

the season know the blip we saw I think

88:36

is somewhat seasonal but it's also

88:37

because remember rates fell mortgage

88:38

rates fell a little bit right 7.3 I

88:41

think 6.4 yeah and that creates a lot of

88:44

Demand right at the margin but again

88:46

with with inflation now turning back

88:49

higher right with the FED telling you

88:51

we're going to do we're going to raise

88:52

rates two more times and keep them there

88:53

for a long time

88:54

um and yet the Market's saying you're

88:56

going to cut rates two times before

88:57

you're in I think there's a mismatch so

88:59

once rates correct to what the FED is

89:00

going to do rates go back higher

89:02

mortgage rates go back higher I think

89:03

you're going to see a further law in the

89:05

housing market what percent downside do

89:07

you see in housing and then what does

89:09

that translate to in stocks that's a

89:11

good question that that's a very tough

89:12

question I would just say you know the

89:14

last housing crisis I think peaked the

89:16

trough a lot of prices were down 40 to

89:17

50 percent and I think we'll see

89:19

something similar I I would say look at

89:21

where prices were pre-pandemic and look

89:23

at where they are now and I think we're

89:24

going to go at least to where we were

89:25

pre-pandemic but typically price is

89:27

undershoot back to Trend or or even

89:29

below that I think it's going to go back

89:30

to where the the price was not even not

89:32

even Trend back to where it was where it

89:34

was potentially lower and if that

89:36

happens you know I think that it's going

89:37

to have I don't know what the effect is

89:39

going to be on the stock market but I

89:41

think it's going to have a profound

89:42

effect I would say you know we could see

89:44

the you know the prep pandemic prices

89:46

the pre-pandemic lows that's where I

89:48

would probably get a lot more bullish on

89:49

everything uh once the s p got down to

89:52

that kind of pre-pandemic level wow

89:53

would you do that with individual stocks

89:55

if let's say you know Amazon or Google

89:57

or pre-prandemic levels would you

89:58

consider picking those up absolutely

90:00

everything okay uh you know once we get

90:02

back down to those pre-pandemic lows

90:04

those scary lows you know pre you know

90:06

fed doing quantitative you know QE

90:08

Infinity

90:09

um you got to get bullish stocks okay

90:10

not saying you have to yeah but I'm

90:12

saying you have to reevaluate your

90:14

position if you're a bear so if you're

90:16

you trade it seems like regularly I mean

90:19

as we were setting up here it sounded

90:20

like not not that I was listening to

90:22

everything you were saying but it sounds

90:23

like you're working trades right uh you

90:26

trade what do you say to somebody who

90:28

doesn't trade somebody who who's long uh

90:31

and says you know what look I wanna I

90:33

wanna buy some stocks that are going to

90:35

be great in 10 years right I I I'm a

90:38

long-term investor I want to make that

90:39

clear

90:40

um there's some positions that we trade

90:41

around but we we like I like to stay in

90:43

stocks personally you know six to 12

90:45

months that's that's my time frame 6 to

90:47

12 months is your long hold listen

90:48

here's the reality this is a fact

90:50

um

90:51

you know two two great books I want to

90:53

recommend this is actually kind of out

90:54

of left field right now the stock market

90:56

operator

90:57

um and sorry say that again reminisces

90:59

of a stock market uh operator and the

91:02

intelligent investor great book

91:03

reminisces is from a guy who is

91:06

extremely successful in the stock market

91:07

from like 1900 to like 1930. but if you

91:10

read it like everything that happened

91:12

back then it's happening right now wow

91:14

so my but my point is

91:16

um with respect to the stock market

91:18

um you know I do I do think that you

91:20

know there's going to be ups and downs

91:22

um but you know with respect to over the

91:25

next 10 years over the long term the

91:27

stock market's going to go up but I

91:28

think there's going to be huge

91:29

fluctuations including Tesla well I'm

91:33

just kidding no no no

91:35

um again I firmly believe Tesla's gonna

91:38

hit our price Target

91:39

um and when it does we'll read that

91:41

we'll reevaluate

91:42

um but you know you have to be nimble

91:44

because

91:45

um

91:46

we've had 10 years of artificially

91:49

repressed interest rates and you know

91:51

quantitative easing essentially the FED

91:53

printing money out of thin air and

91:55

buying stuff and you know what people

91:58

will say rightfully what a bull will say

91:59

to me is Gordon why are you worried now

92:01

right we've had this stimulus for so

92:02

many years here's why I'm worried we now

92:04

have inflation higher than it's been in

92:06

40 years that's a big change that's

92:07

something that we haven't had over the

92:09

past 15 years even though it's fading

92:11

away but it's not it's it's now on the

92:13

uptrend again if you look at the

92:15

non-seasonally adjusted CPI

92:17

it's now trending up and you saw a

92:19

hockey stick in 2021 that's still going

92:21

up right it was going like this and then

92:23

at the beginning of the year when crude

92:24

fell went like this now it's going back

92:25

up right so I think that's a concern and

92:28

again the data today kind of supports

92:29

that month over month you know we're

92:31

accelerating so

92:32

um I think you got to be nimble um and

92:34

the reason I suggested those books is

92:36

because there's a lot of lessons in

92:37

those books as to what's happening now

92:39

look this Market is extremely

92:41

unpredictable I mean you know you had

92:44

you know multiple years of put it this

92:47

way when the FED did QE Infinity right

92:50

when they when they did that right the

92:52

risk reward was pretty easy owning

92:53

stocks but now that you've had you know

92:55

the FED funds rate go from zero to five

92:57

in a short in short order right you had

92:59

a bank that had been extremely nefarious

93:02

and Incredibly alleged to be engaging in

93:04

illegal activities effectively bailed

93:06

out right which is you know it's just

93:08

you don't know what's gonna happen like

93:09

what happens when the so my point is

93:11

it's extremely hard to make money in

93:14

this market but I think long term you

93:16

find the companies that are trading at

93:18

decent multiples not not not 60 times

93:21

like Tesla you know you're talking about

93:22

you know five to six times

93:24

um or whatever the industry multiple is

93:26

hopefully around where their peers are

93:27

uh that generates cash and this is the

93:30

business you believe in and I think if

93:31

you invest in that you'll do okay do you

93:33

try to do you ever consider like a PEG

93:36

ratio so taking that p e dividing that

93:37

growth or or do you solely focus on PE

93:41

no no there's there's actually a chapter

93:43

in the intelligent investor where

93:44

there's a number of key points you want

93:46

to look at before you invest in these

93:47

stocks and I'm not saying you apply each

93:49

one of those of course yeah sure but I

93:51

like to you know I like to buy low sell

93:53

High all right and you know a lot of

93:55

these stocks are trading at

93:57

generationally high multiples and those

93:59

are the stocks we try to stay away from

94:01

okay

94:02

um a couple more topics here uh we'll do

94:05

energy crypto and final question we'll

94:07

wrap up so you have uh some strong

94:10

Theses about energy solar uh it doesn't

94:13

sound like you like for solar uh the

94:15

Chinese have really substantially taken

94:17

over solar manufacturing they did a

94:19

great job actually I think I mean it's

94:21

from 2013 they got from zero solar to

94:24

basically now dominating the world and

94:26

they've got some of the best

94:27

Technologies yeah what what's going on

94:29

what's going on with the energy Market

94:30

is this going to be a short-term blip

94:31

here in energy stocks a buying

94:33

opportunity or long-term screw when you

94:35

say energy I assume you're referring to

94:36

solar specific group let's do uh yeah

94:38

let's let's start with solar okay so

94:40

with solar so the solar stocks are

94:43

trading at in our view what are

94:44

ridiculous multiples and the reason that

94:46

is is because last year due to the push

94:50

by people like you know Larry Fink at

94:52

BlackRock Etc on ESG investing forcing

94:55

money into that space as well as a lot

94:58

of talk around

94:59

um you know the green New Deal and then

95:01

build back better and then find finally

95:03

the inflation reduction act you know I

95:05

think

95:06

and this is our phrase I think the

95:08

analysts in the space for the most part

95:09

are criminally bullish oh wow and what I

95:11

mean by that is you know first of all I

95:14

just reported earnings last time I

95:15

checked stocks down 10 today we told our

95:17

clients we're like listen we've seen

95:19

this before right we saw it with Obama

95:21

when Obama got elected over the over

95:23

Obama's full presidential term eight

95:25

years the Solar Tan index fell 78 you

95:29

would not believe that right why here's

95:31

why we got in the stocks went up like

95:34

gangbusters why because he said we're

95:36

going to do solar we're going to do

95:37

introduce all these incentives he did

95:39

and people the South Side they were

95:41

creating these like Fantastical future

95:43

projections I remember one of the one of

95:45

the key Theses was you know every single

95:47

airport is going to have a solar panel

95:48

on it that was and they create these

95:50

like Fantastical projections but you

95:52

think about it right the US is not the

95:54

biggest Market in the world and just

95:57

because you give me you know my neighbor

95:59

right let's forget it I don't mean that

96:01

but you know let's say somebody in the

96:03

neighborhood right you give them a 30

96:04

tax credit but what if they're going

96:06

through hard times are they gonna that

96:08

you know they're not gonna buy the the

96:10

discretionary 30 to 40 000 solar system

96:12

sure so our point was to our clients you

96:15

know people are making Fantastical

96:17

projections they were doing that all

96:18

last year which is why the stocks ran up

96:19

and now these companies are reporting

96:21

earnings in phases down 26 percent right

96:23

First Solar down nine percent didn't go

96:25

down 10 today they're reporting their

96:27

earnings and the earnings aren't

96:28

matching up to the Fantastical you know

96:29

projections we I've been covering solar

96:31

longer than I'd like to admit I'm

96:32

embarrassed I've been covering solar

96:34

since 2007. so I've seen these Cycles

96:36

where people get extremely excited and

96:38

then reality meets you know meets the

96:40

road and I think reality is going to

96:41

meet the road this year but the other

96:43

problem is solar doesn't work and what I

96:46

mean by that is you cannot replace

96:48

distributed base load fossil fuel power

96:50

with intermittent Peak load solar slash

96:53

wind power and the reason is because you

96:55

know the eia used to put out these grid

96:57

parity analyzes and they were saying you

96:59

know solar power is equal to the cost of

97:01

fossil fuel and that couldn't be any

97:03

further from the truth and in fact if

97:05

you call the eia up they'll admit that

97:06

now they've included um you know

97:08

transmission costs

97:10

um you know brownout costs Etc solar is

97:12

exorbitantly more expensive and the poop

97:14

is in the pudding Look at California

97:15

look at the cost of power in California

97:17

versus United States it looks like this

97:19

California same with Germany so

97:21

I think solar is a good short this year

97:24

because you've had the stocks run to

97:26

Fantastical levels based on projections

97:29

that are ridiculous and I think longer

97:31

term the reason why we like nuclear is

97:32

because if you believe that we need to

97:35

move towards we need to move towards you

97:37

know zero carbon electricity solar is

97:40

just not real a real solution think

97:41

about this right you know Merkel pushed

97:44

solar on the European Union right solar

97:46

and wind and they went all in on solar

97:47

wind and what happened they shut down

97:49

their coal plants they shut down their

97:50

nuclear plants but really happened they

97:52

became Reliant they just basically

97:54

they're importing power in from Russia

97:55

that gave Russia the power literally to

97:58

start a war because they knew they could

98:00

do it and they would still have to buy

98:01

Power from them this is dangerous energy

98:03

security is dangerous

98:05

um I want to give you a statistic here

98:06

uh you know you know a lot of the

98:08

politicians talk about how

98:10

um you know people are you know CO2

98:13

emissions people are dying

98:15

um so let's see here deaths so since

98:17

1920 deaths each year from natural

98:21

disasters have decreased over 90 percent

98:23

and one of the key reasons this has

98:25

happened is because we're investing in

98:28

things like you know fighting

98:30

um you know rising sea levels Etc

98:33

um let's see here CO2 emission that's

98:35

not the stat I wanted to give you hold

98:36

on let me find this stuff

98:38

um and then I'll also while you're

98:39

looking for that I'll ask you about

98:40

batteries because that seems to help

98:42

with that intermittentness of solar and

98:45

wind so

98:47

um so let's see here

98:49

um

98:50

so yeah sorry

98:53

um I can't find the statistic but

98:55

for instance one thing one thing I

98:57

wanted to make sure I got in there so

98:59

think about this right so the world has

99:01

invested four trillion dollars overall

99:03

in wind and solar over the years and

99:05

right now the world gets three percent

99:07

of its power from uh Renewables right

99:10

and Elon musk's Master Plan Three he's

99:13

saying with another 10 trillion invested

99:15

the world's going to get 97 of their

99:17

power from Renewables do you realize how

99:19

ridiculous this is do you understand

99:21

what I'm saying well based on the

99:22

numbers that you gave I'd obviously I'd

99:24

have to break them down but based on the

99:25

argument you're making it that sounds

99:26

ridiculous right right so one thing I

99:29

want to highlight right and I'm gonna

99:30

read from my notes if you don't mind so

99:32

we're spending trillions of dollars on

99:34

solar and wind right let me let me give

99:36

you a statistic so

99:38

um in the Netherlands right right now

99:41

the Netherlands sits sits two feet below

99:43

sea level right

99:45

but because over the top past 500 years

99:48

they've invested 10 billion dollars

99:49

right 10 billion dollars over the past

99:51

500 years

99:53

um they've prospered right so my point

99:56

is is spending all this money on solar

99:58

the right way to spend it so if

100:00

California focused the money that

100:02

they're spending on solar on forest fire

100:04

prevention prevention or nuclear

100:07

um instead would it be money better

100:08

spent

100:10

um you know folks in the Netherlands

100:12

that spent 10 billion dollars over the

100:13

past 500 years and despite currently

100:15

being two feet under sea they're

100:16

flourishing in fact there was a global

100:20

sea levels have risen one feat over the

100:22

past hundred years and everybody in the

100:24

Netherlands is fine

100:25

um humans are amazing at adapting but

100:29

sending trillions of dollars to China

100:30

for solar panels I think is a huge waste

100:33

of money in fact the airport in the

100:36

Netherlands right now the airport was

100:38

the site of a naval battle so you know

100:39

these fears that oh my God Florida is

100:41

going to sink under the water if we

100:43

invest in prevention versus China these

100:45

solar panels that's proven to be the way

100:47

to go and I think that the money that's

100:49

being wasted on solar right now is

100:51

potentially setting us up for disaster

100:53

do you understand what I'm saying oh

100:55

yeah I absolutely do I also agree with

100:57

your argument on sort of a household

100:59

level that in these more challenging

101:01

Economic Times where homeowners who are

101:03

obviously have to be a homeowner to

101:04

install solar homeowners are going to be

101:06

potentially under more stress than let's

101:09

say a minimum wage worker who's seen

101:10

their wage rise 50 right yeah you're

101:12

probably going to see less investments

101:14

in those 30 40 000 projects especially

101:16

and actually to to some would reiterate

101:18

your argument despite the fact that I

101:19

actually like companies like endphase

101:21

out of the solar panels right they're

101:23

into batteries and inverters

101:25

um one thing that you're right about is

101:28

with the new net energy metering plans

101:30

you basically have to get solar and a

101:33

battery but that now makes your entry

101:35

cost twice as high for getting in so

101:38

yeah they're I think I actually think

101:40

you're right there's a reason to be

101:41

short-term bearish yeah I mean you so we

101:44

the only battery tax rate we have is

101:46

from the California solar initiative CSI

101:48

and none of my peers track that data

101:49

it's extremely hard to parse through I

101:50

had to hire a

101:52

um a a a data engineer but the point is

101:55

the battery attachments are collapsing

101:57

wow that's supposed to be going the

101:59

other way okay this is just the data I'd

102:01

love to see that yeah the problem is

102:02

nobody's tracking this data but you're

102:04

seeing it right in Phase their battery

102:05

numbers were horrible

102:07

um the same thing with the other solar

102:09

companies that have reported earnings

102:10

that sell batteries so

102:12

it's just simple right it's like people

102:14

are hurting more economically you're

102:16

talking about a 30 to 40 000

102:18

discretionary purpose a purchase solar

102:21

panels and batteries you're not going to

102:23

see people buy more of that when the

102:24

economy is getting worse yeah and face

102:26

has this argument and I I have a feeling

102:28

I know what you're gonna say but give

102:29

you a chance to say it and face has this

102:31

argument that well you know we sell to

102:34

wholesalers and in q1 we tend to have a

102:36

very lagged sale a sell through you know

102:38

wholesalers have inventory but in

102:40

addition to that because the cost of

102:42

capital have risen so has risen so much

102:43

a lot of the wholesalers are trying to

102:45

reduce their inventories therefore may

102:47

be ordering less from end phase end

102:49

phase thinks this is uh that Q2 will be

102:52

the bottom in that what do you think is

102:54

is that right but these same companies

102:55

were telling you when they reported you

102:57

know Q3 numbers that you're going to

103:00

have this massive demand pull in ahead

103:02

of any M 3.0 taking effect in California

103:04

it's like they're complete everybody's

103:06

completely forgetting what these

103:07

companies told you just three months ago

103:08

you were supposed to have

103:10

huge beats in q1 sure right from all the

103:13

solar companies because that's why when

103:15

they report earnings the stocks are

103:16

actually falling right because because

103:17

of Any M 3.0 taking effect in mid-april

103:20

yeah the q1 numbers are supposed to be X

103:22

you know out of this world and now

103:24

they're actually coming in disappointing

103:25

these guys are like oh yeah it's going

103:27

to be better next quarter look I've

103:28

covered solar forever uh again

103:30

embarrassed to say how long and the

103:32

reality is if you go back to 2009 and

103:34

hey when things get worse these

103:36

companies get more aspirational the

103:37

marketing gets worse

103:39

um so I think the reality is it's too

103:43

expensive and if somebody's honest with

103:45

you call somebody to your house who's

103:47

honest right doesn't care about stocks

103:50

and say hey should I buy a battery or

103:53

should I buy a generator and see what

103:55

they say interesting 100 a 10 out of 10

103:58

times they're going to tell you to buy a

103:59

generator because that solar battery

104:00

when your power actually goes out is

104:02

going to give you maybe in two hours of

104:03

power whereas a generator will actually

104:05

give you real power it's just the

104:07

technology is not there yet and it's

104:09

it's exorbitantly expensive so sure

104:10

bearish or forever bearish let me give

104:13

you statistics so it would cost a

104:16

hundred trillion dollars right and take

104:18

400 years to build the batteries lithium

104:21

ion batteries current technology

104:22

necessary to power just Europe this

104:24

winter that's from the Manhattan

104:26

Institute

104:27

um to move every car on the road to EVS

104:30

the world would have to double its grid

104:33

capacity costing trillions that would

104:34

send basically when you're talking about

104:36

a hundred trillion or trillions of

104:38

dollars you're talking about

104:38

hyperinflation pretty much everywhere

104:40

right and by the way no one's doing that

104:42

right now

104:43

um if you covered the entire continent

104:45

of the United States according to the

104:46

Manhattan Institute with solar panels it

104:48

would power less than half the country

104:51

you know so the math just doesn't work

104:55

um you know um so the Battery Technology

104:58

is not there we've said this for a long

104:59

time we said that you know the reason

105:01

why you know in-phase trades where it

105:03

does and solar Edge trades where it does

105:04

is because you know these batteries were

105:06

supposed to explode right they're

105:07

supposed to start happening in Q4 then

105:09

it was going to be q1 because of Any M

105:10

3.0 now that it's not happening in q1 oh

105:12

it's an inventory thing it's gonna

105:13

happen in Q2 they'll tell you this as

105:15

long as their stock is up right this is

105:16

our opinion but it's not happening and

105:18

it's not happening because it's

105:19

exorbitantly expensive and it's

105:20

extremely inefficient and if you don't

105:22

want to trust take my word for it call a

105:24

solar installer who's honest right ask

105:26

the guy who's actually you know the guy

105:29

who's not trying to sell you a panel

105:30

asked the honest guy to get maybe the

105:32

guys who come install and say hey should

105:33

I do a generator or a battery and see

105:35

what they say they'll tell you the truth

105:37

you can call the Generac sales folks

105:39

because they offer both right they offer

105:40

better batteries and so right all right

105:42

last question

105:44

um you know let me do a really quick

105:46

rapid fire and then I have that last

105:48

question so really quick rapid fire uh

105:50

bullish for bearish crypto bearish

105:52

script though let me tell you why okay

105:53

number one the tech doesn't solve a real

105:55

problem it's simply used to speculate

105:57

you got this one written out number two

105:58

it's not a real currency and can't act

106:00

as a functional currency why because

106:02

there's a fixed Supply any time in

106:04

history where you've had a fixed Supply

106:05

currency it fails tremendously number

106:07

three wait wait wait that's a big claim

106:09

right there you're saying because but

106:10

because people argue that the value of

106:12

Bitcoin is that it has a fixed Supply

106:14

you're saying if it has a fixed Supply

106:15

it's going to fail let me let me explain

106:17

yeah so

106:18

let's say you have a fixed supply of

106:20

dollars right and the economy goes into

106:24

a tail spin right for instance we had

106:26

covet right sure what did they do they

106:28

printed money of course to save us right

106:30

they needed to do that right I think the

106:32

initial 2 trillion was understandable I

106:34

think it was too much the original cares

106:36

okay but if you have a fixed amount you

106:37

couldn't print anything yeah well that's

106:39

true it wouldn't work um number three

106:41

all cryptos are unregistered

106:42

unregistered Securities and number four

106:44

private currencies have always been

106:47

disasters I'll talk about you know the

106:49

problem you know the wildcat banks of

106:51

the 1983 1937 and 63 time frame you know

106:54

these so-called wildcat banks the issue

106:56

was their reserves were not verifially

106:58

backed thus they were subject to runs in

107:01

which customers couldn't access their

107:03

funds every time in history we've had a

107:06

different form of currency it hasn't

107:08

worked so for those four reasons I think

107:10

crypto is literally worthless outside of

107:14

speculation wow uh so uh that then that

107:18

goes for all all ethereum all the

107:20

derivatives defy I agree with Munger

107:23

it's like rat poison

107:24

I think it's purely speculative and you

107:26

can see that right Bitcoin essentially

107:28

moves with the NASDAQ can you can I go

107:30

to Burger King right now and buy a

107:32

burger with Bitcoin can I can I buy a

107:34

car with Bitcoin you understand like

107:36

it's it's it's it's literally ludicrous

107:38

this is what happens this is what

107:41

happens when you print trillions of

107:44

dollars you print you know 300 years

107:46

worth of dollars in two months you have

107:48

stuff like this happen you have like you

107:50

know pictures being sold for millions of

107:52

dollars nfts I mean this is just crazy

107:54

stuff the last question is uh a little

107:57

dare I say out of left field you have

107:59

but it's from your Twitter uh you uh

108:02

quote tweeted this uh from a black

108:04

millionaires Steve Harvey explains

108:07

what's wrong with this young generation

108:09

of men today that was today yeah yeah

108:11

this young generation of men today

108:13

asking what women bring to the table

108:15

this is very Andrew Tay desk right right

108:17

and uh his response was a woman can make

108:20

another you so I want to ask you where

108:24

is your mindset on on this Andrew tadism

108:27

that we're seeing now yeah I don't know

108:29

if I'll comment on that but my point

108:31

with that is I just think that

108:33

um

108:35

you know I just think the men need to

108:36

step up

108:37

um and I'm a firm I'm old school you

108:40

know I was you know I'm I'm a little

108:42

older and you know my parents were alive

108:43

during the times of

108:46

um you know when black people in the US

108:48

are fighting for their civil rights and

108:49

I think that you know men should you

108:51

know step up and and take care of their

108:53

families and their kids I have no view

108:55

on Andrew Tate

108:56

um I'm not gonna go there but that was

108:58

that was the point of that um you know I

109:00

just I think I think it's a good thing

109:01

for men to step up and

109:03

um you know take care of your family

109:05

very nice anything else that you'd like

109:07

to add this was great when I sent you

109:10

the tweet I thought it was going to be

109:11

confrontational this this has been great

109:12

you've been extremely nice even off

109:14

camera

109:15

um thank you thank you this is amazing

109:16

shout yourself out how do people follow

109:18

you and and your firm uh we're glj

109:20

research you can see our website

109:22

um and you know I think everybody knows

109:24

our Twitter address perfect awesome well

109:27

look forward to seeing you again in the

109:28

future thank you so much

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.