Jerome Powell Problem | Bull Flippening.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
hey take a look at this this is a bull
okay A lot of people are asking me Hey
Kevin can you cover more bullish stuff
are you always bearish I'm like no many
of you know I'm not always bearish I've
been bearish since July and I expect to
be bearish until at least right before
the election and and then trust me I
want to go back to being a bull okay
it's a lot easier but at least in the
meantime people are asking me Kevin like
hey you know can you give us like some
kind of like bull hope at least to look
at and I thought okay yeah let's look at
TS Lombard uh and the reason like TS
Lombard is because this team over here
they're generally generally more bullish
uh than than what I see by others out on
Wall Street uh and I like balancing My
Views to theirs you know for example uh
Dario Perkins over here starts with I've
been in the soft Landing camp for a
while and he's not going to abandon it
now okay all right so we kind of know
where this is getting started right uh
he's telling us hey look I'm a soft
Landing guy and these guys are
professional wall streeters I I love
their Insight honestly I recommend
everybody check out TS Lombard it's #n
notsponsored I I just like reading them
like when I see their name pop up I'm
like oh I wonder what they have to say
hopefully it's kind of like that for you
for me where it's like oh me Kevin video
hopefully you come and learn new things
every time right that's the goal uh so I
was reading this last night and I'm like
oh I was not expecting this so uh I want
you to see how he's net bullish but some
issues that are coming up for them take
a look at this so I'm not going to
abandon it now especially after the feds
50 basis point cut mind you with this 50
basis point cut here there are a lot of
people on Wall Street that say the left
tail has been eliminated by uh the
Federal Reserve I actually think that's
a pretty crazy um how should I put it um
complacent thing to say I don't think
the left tail is ever removed
but there were some analysts on Wall
Street I was reading they're like oh the
Federal Reserve basically said look we
cannot go to the left the left is down
right this is the down Market this is
sad this is like hyper runaway melt up
amazing bullish economy uh and then you
know this is your sort of middle
standard deviations here right middle
standard deviation one standard
deviation two okay simple the left tail
is like everything goes to poopy doopy
and uh this analyst I was reading
earlier today they're like oh the fed's
eliminated the left tail risk no left
tail risk this is great and I'm like no
no no no the FED has not eliminated a
left tail risk until they cut rates by
200 basis points in an emergency
capitulation capitulation cut and then
they cut another 20000 basis points and
we're basically back under 1% you know
then I think the Federal Reserve has
actually stopped the left tail risk now
maybe they're signaling that they would
be willing to do that but I don't think
they would be willing to do that until
you have some serious pain in Market KS
so uh you know point of that right is is
just to say like hey you know the FED
could be there to bail you out but the
fed's not going to capitulate and bail
you out until something breaks and
something actually has like a lot of
pain for a while the downside of that is
if something has a lot of pain for a
while it means valuations are are
typically lower right uh this is why
sometimes on days like today I kind of
just like uh trading you know this
morning I threw in uh right when data
came out we talked about it I threw in
this see 7 a.m. is even where my
screenshot is I threw in this order here
5 seconds after the data came out you
could look at that timing 82 Cent
purchase on the cues uh and this was my
Tesla S sell which I made some profit on
that which was nice but look at that I
sold it for 159 which was nearly a
double and I hit Buy on that I send a
notification to everybody in my Discord
puts and CNBC comes on like a minute
later they start tanking the freaking
Market was like kind of funny uh you got
to beat CNBC to the news uh but anyway
we try to do more of that I think that's
that's always entertaining uh remember
we have a flash sale in honor of that
called Data double going on until uh the
end of the day today and that trade held
its value for for like another 20
minutes or so so like you didn't have to
be really fast on jumping out uh but uh
but eventually we did end up bottoming
out on the cues and it it was important
to cover but anyway take a look at this
they say I'm not going to abandon after
the 50 you know especially after the
feds 50 that's fine uh it's a commitment
to not fall behind the curve blah blah
blah but there are a couple things that
are bothering me I'm like oh interesting
a bull getting bothered that's that's
rare usually it's just like hey it's
just going to go straight up recent
labor market trends covering in depth uh
covered in depth we've been talking
about these already uh and the sudden
rather surprising relapse in global
manufacturing okay so both of these
matter we've been covering these either
in the manufa facturing isms we've been
covering them in the labor market the uh
attemp layoffs the peing out of
government and education employes the
peaking out of job openings the number
of people who are 27 weeks unemployed
look that up Google that one and it's
I'm telling you it looks like you're in
a recession but anyway uh uh and then a
third thing that bothers him central
banks taking Victory laps okay
interesting so he's a bull and he's like
hm we're starting to face some problems
here labor market trends Manu facturing
and then the Federal Reserve basically
trying to say everything's fine we're
winning I actually agree with this I
think these Victory laps are somewhat
hubris and I was a little nervous that I
I feel like Drome Powell is holding back
the concerns he truly has and he's like
don't worry everything's fine to
purposefully pump the markets because he
realizes that if the stock market's up
you have a lower chance of getting
layoffs but but you're built on fugazi
foundations then yeah it's not great but
anyway the cycle that fooled the
consensus this has not been a normal
business cycle and they talk about how
leading indicators have given false
signals like postco manufacturing
recession uh this was not a sign of a
broader economic crash the Phillips
curve was wrong the Philips curve was
suggesting we should have had interest
rates up at like 9 or 10% uh people
thought a recession would be needed to
cure inflation no it's just once you
start lapping the price increases
everything's adjusted up wow all of a
sudden you don't need more inflation
unless you're printing more money okay
we we knew that that's fine this is why
we've been talking Nike SW recovery for
a while B baverage curve this this has
to do with the labor market expanding
labor force participation yield curve
predicts policy easings not necessarily
recession well the problem is usually
when you come out of recession you
predict a lot of easing it's because you
are pricing in a recession we're still
not there yet usually you don't start a
recession until you're 50 to 90 basis
points uninverted and uh we're at about
20 right now partial debt sustain ility
blah blah blah okay so the biggest error
so far postco in calling for a recession
has been underestimating the resilience
of Labor markets or believing that
central banks would have to destroy
labor markets to get inflation down
which would cause a recession even now
there's still a chance that people are
misleading or misreading labor market
trends here I want to focus on a
different issue Global manufacturing two
years ago it was easy to dismiss the
weakness in manufacturing as a head fake
okay so basically let me show this to
you on the map when you go down you go
down because of covid okay this this
makes logical sense when you come back
up you go up because everybody's
printing money like crazy and then of
course you're going to have a
year-over-year comparison so you're
going to have some volatility after the
you know the remarkable recovery what
he's most concerned about right now
beyond the labor market weakening which
we've already covered on the channel is
this right here this is his second big
concern
he's going wait a minute this latest
deterioration is actually more
concerning this chart is in his words
and he's a bull he's a soft Landing bull
particularly ugly okay that's not good
because this now means you've got the
labor market that's poopy doopy and now
you've got manufacturing that's turning
poopy doopy that's not great this is a
lot of poopy
dupies uh and then of course you know
you have uh the the oil Market that you
know yeah it bounced today because of
Chinese stimulus I mean we we we knew
the Chinese stimulus was coming we
weren't expecting it to be this big this
was great wonder what oil ended up
but the oil Market is signaling some
distress it might be the same distress
that you get someone like a Jamie
Diamond arguing about of like H you know
the market is pricing in Perfection I
think I'm going to sit on the sidelines
for this one that's what Jamie Diamond
says now maybe it's because he's getting
ready to retire or go on to I don't know
make a spack or something who knows but
uh you know it's saying something when
some of these big boys are like I don't
know man this is getting a little silly
but yeah look oil markets bottom to a
three and a half year low two weeks ago
today uh actually I think it was 15 days
ago but whatever you've had a nice
rebound from 69 to 75 but you're talking
an 89% rebound cool you're still way
lower than where you have been I mean
here's the chart that they they've given
on this uh and and this does signal uh a
downtrend uh either if you draw it like
this or frankly you look at uh you know
this sort of ceiling of highs that
you're getting this downtrend here you
know this is this is certainly
recessionary and it's again a sign of
weakening manufacturing base 18 months
ago we could basically ignore what's
happening in the global industrial cycle
reopening from the pandemic had caused a
massive pivot from Goods to services and
blah blah blah this triggered a huge
bull whip effect in inventories and
Manufacturing weakness didn't tell us
anything but now he's kind of like I
don't know now now we might be a little
bit in sort of a leading indicator issue
see this is why he shows up this uh us
leading indicator six-month annual
change and if you notice we've recovered
here in the leading indicator but we're
already starting to inflect back down so
it's like was was this drop right here
just sort of counterbalancing the run
but now we're inflecting back down
that's what he's looking at then he
looks he says over here so what's going
on is this a sudden relapse and not part
of the original fake cycle is this
something to worry about is it a sign of
monetary tightening finally starting to
bite maybe by the way you know that
would be a way of saying uh that
suddenly you've got a Federal Reserve
that has actually tightened because
inflation has fallen so much and even
though they're not raising rates anymore
the excess increase in rates that we
have is is leading to a tighter
environment but Global manufacturing
capacity
utilization this is we
they're basically pointing out here like
wait a minute why are we normalizing
here we should not be capping out here
because if we draw a line from where we
are and we draw it all the way back and
then you kind of just draw cross points
you're as bad as you were in
2012 uh over here in 2005 coming out of
the 2001 recession going into the Great
Recession uh you know close to almost a
brief low over here in uh 2015 uh and
then 2019 so so you're at at a pretty
low normal level if this is supposed to
be a return to normal this is odd
obviously China's uh economy looks worse
than people have ever seen before but
then again we got you know stimulus uh
today uh so so who knows maybe uh maybe
maybe that'll you know all of a sudden
help China uh but and and and spring up
manufacturing demand is what they're
suggesting but then again would would it
support Chinese manufacturing or us
manufacturing right probably Chinese
Manufacturing
uh but anyway after two two years of
listen to this after two years of
talking down recession
scares I'm conscious that I might
finally be overplaying my hand listen to
that a bull is saying damn okay if
you're bullish he's B basically here's
what he's doing if you're bull he's
saying
look we we might still stick to soft
Landing but we should really start
paying attention to labor I mean we saw
what happened in the ism report
yesterday Manufacturing Services
composite all lower than expected not
great the Beats were nominal and the
lows were low we saw what happened in
the Challenger report from a couple
weeks ago that was a horrible jobs
report we saw what happened this morning
on the conference board uh estimates not
good this is just some of the recent
data it just sort of compounds what
you've been seeing beige book nine out
of 12 sectors weakening this is
problematic but what does he say here as
I keep saying we are a more I think he
meant to say in a more but as I keep
saying we are in a more precarious
situation now and it is unsettling to
see Central Bankers do victory dances
okay this is this is a big one because I
I want you to just for a moment think
about
this when when Central Bankers do a
victory dance they're basically telling
you it's okay if interest rates go up
but wait a minute
now you're not fighting the
manufacturing pain or the jobs pain
because you just let yields rise which
is like fully dumb like I want to say
you know a word I shouldn't be saying
but it's basically it's kind of like
fully our word okay like we shouldn't be
saying or even referencing these things
but for the Federal Reserve to suggest
that oh we've declared Victory
everything's good and then all of a
sudden you see this jump and yields you
are tightening
on top of Labor Market weakness and
Manufacturing weakness that is full dumb
and why does the market keep rewarding
the fed well
because the FED is performing a victory
dance central bank hubris is definitely
top of cycle stuff yeah that's not a
good line uh and this is a bull this is
this is the full bull here but it isn't
time to panic yet not until the Perkins
rule triggers okay the Perkins rule is
sort of his version of the PS Rule and
he's like the PS rule might be triggered
but the Perkins rule hasn't triggered it
you know and then actually compares to
mrss too this is his rule on
unemployment he's like it hasn't hit yet
okay that's fine that that's fine but
let's just be clear a bull is like
things are still okay but we do have
problems let me show you quickly the
Perkins rule so you could see it here so
this is the Perkins rule Revisited from
August uh 26th
and let's just go right to his
definition of the Perkins rule so
basically what you have here is how does
the Perkins rule compare to the S rule
it certainly has more false positives
okay so so this is important because if
he's if the Perkins rule triggers it's
bad and he's saying his rule has more
false positives while it is rare for us
payrolls to decline outside of
recessions it does happen occasionally
usually this is due to obvious
distortions such as extreme weather but
it also happened during the famous soft
Landing in 1995 when a shockingly bad
employment report later revised prompted
Allen Greenspan to cut rates it also
happened in the late 60s okay well hold
on a second in 1995 you may have briefly
had a strong labor report but in 1995
1994 95 and 96 if you read the Federal
Reserve Open Market Committee
transcripts you will find what I saw as
well which is for those three years they
do nothing but talk about how the labor
market is so freaking tight we might be
causing a wage price spiral and they
only cut rates because they're like all
right we don't see the wage price spiral
yet the jobs Market's pretty tight but
you know and people aren't going out
there to hire they actually called some
businesses discouraged as as a reason
for why they weren't hiring uh but
anyway so then you look at this and he
goes okay Perkins rule over here sees
the uh Perkins rule fals positive in
1995 and and over there in the 60s so
it's clearly less functional than the
PSM rule uh but let's let's read what he
says the Perkins rule isn't fullprof but
that's not the point the important thing
is that when you look at every time the
P rule is triggered since World War II
there were only three occasions where
payrolls were not already negative 1970
1974 and
1980 usually when the S rule triggers
the Perkins rule has already triggered
that matters because it's the opposite
of what's happening today the latest
triggering of the P rule looks very
different to the average recessionary
experience so he's making an argument
here that basically I mean I hate to say
it but this time is different but he is
also saying that like hey if if we TR if
this should be a bad flag our our our
indicator should have already been
firing even if it's a false positive it
should have fired before the Som Rule
and so you know his rule is made up of
of slightly different measures and we we
don't know how useful or functional it
actually is but I want again you to show
or or you to see why uh is he saying
this just to be clear because I I don't
think I actually say it as clearly in
this video so I wanted to edit this in
just to add a little bit more clarity
the Perkins rule is when the
unemployment report comes in negative
now why is that important well the
Perkins rule basically Triggers on a
very simple basis it's when the
unemployment Port whatever it is comes
out and it comes in with any negative
read so that is going to introduce a lot
more volatility so if we go jobs report
St Louis Fred let's just say and uh we
get the uh change uh in payrolls we
could just open up the chart and look
and go all right cool when is it
negative and how often does it go
negative well an easy way to do that is
you look for the change in thousands of
people on a monthly frequency so you
just have to edit that a little bit on
the uh St Louis Fred website and once
you do that uh then you could actually
see how noisy it could be that you're
negative so uh it's a little easier to
get rid of the pandemic here because
then you could see over here oh look you
were actually negative in 2003 uh in
April of 2003 but the FED had already
capitulated at this point you know you
were bailing out you you were leaving
the market at the point you had a
negative report it looks like here 1997
-2k you had a negative report right
there - 7,000 in 1996 so that's another
false flag you had a uh- 15,000 over
here I I don't know that these oneoff
hits are that useful because look how
many false reads you get false false
false false false false false false is
Perkins rule like by the time we get the
Perkins rule in this economy we're going
to have some major problems because look
at this what you're really looking for
now is this downtrend that's happening
here right I mean even if you don't
believe in technical analysis I think we
could all argue these are lower highs
and lower lows it's a down Channel now
in case that's not particularly obvious
let's just smooth this out to the
quarterly okay is that more obvious of
downtrend let's go let's go
semiannual do you see the
downtrend now uh keep in mind we only
have the first half on here so it
doesn't actually show the deterioration
yet uh in the second quarter and so when
you throw that in you get that other
pull down over here so it doesn't look
that flat and then obviously if you go
out onto the monthly uh you could see
you know we are somewhat stabilizing
there in that June July August period
but a lot of people at this going come
on man this crap's probably already
negative anyway we can't believe their
numbers but imagine if their crazy
numbers go
negative ooh it's going to be dirty the
trend is not your friend and the Perkins
rule is probably going to trigger pretty
dang soon unless of course you think 150
BP cut all of a sudden is going to lead
to some boom in in hiring so I actually
wrote this down you know a few weeks ago
and he says uh there are several
problems interpreting the psalm rule
today this is is not a regular business
cycle again this is this time is
different the jobless rate comes from
many from the household survey which
looks artificially weak compared to
payrolls and so this is where I say many
would dispute this given the households
was more accurate post the BLS revisions
so I'm actually kind of you know
suggesting here that like hey like maybe
the household survey is actually more
accurate but than the you know payrolls
report but all the data is just a mess
it's hard to know what to believe strong
labor force growth has driven most of
the rise in the unemployment rate it is
harder to tell a reflexivity story when
employment is still growing so this
right here is a labor force
participation reference that you know
even if the participation rate stays the
same if you have a larger group of
people participating then you actually
have more employment but it looks like
the unemployment rate is going up so
this is where he's saying I'm not saying
everything is great investors should
fade the RW he's just saying the US
Labor Market does look increasingly
precarious and is not great when you go
into every employment report wondering
if this data is going to show gener you
know actual cracks genuine cracks the
FED needs to get ahead of this remember
this is from uh um you know about three
weeks ago but the point again of showing
you this was just to say that his take
is the Perkins rule hasn't triggered yet
and the Perkins rule is going to trigger
if you end up getting substantially
lower payroll reads in other words we
could just be one payroll report away
from his per Rule triggering and then
you're you're starting to get to where
you're triggering every kind of uh of of
recessionary warning signal you could
potentially ask for uh
so uh anyway uh he says uh just so you
see it here uh the Perkins rule the idea
that it is a cont contraction in
employment that signals recession not a
gradual trick trickle higher in the
jobless rate right right right right so
but this gradual contraction employment
is already what we're
seeing from the Challenger report from
the ism reports from the conference
board reports so anyway out of all of
this what do I think like what's my
bottom line takeaway I'm watching this
guy because he's a bull and I think he's
got logic I I agree with his tools I
agree it like things are really
concerning when it comes to labor right
now but I also agree that there is a
shot at a soft Landing he probably puts
a soft landing at you know a 60% chance
you know I put a recession at more like
a 70% chance so we're kind of flipped on
that but when that guy capitulates and
goes
bearish that that's that's when I know
it's uh it's about to get real and so
we're not quite there yet but as you can
see the way he talks you know in his in
his report three weeks ago he's like I
don't want to you know like play down
the r word and then what's he saying
this time this time he's going uh three
things are bothering me the sudden
rather surprising relapse in
manufacturing labor market trends and
top of cycle stuff like the Fed so again
uh like when you combine all of this I
just can't help myself but go like I
don't know man is this time to fomo by
right now is this fomo like all in
like I think the risk is way hi uh if if
we can get give me like two or three
labor reports you know give me give me
the September labor report from what I'm
seeing is going to be trash uh let me
see if the estimates are out by the way
give me the September labor report give
me the October labor report in November
and maybe even the December labor report
and if you really want to be sure
there's no recession give me the January
labor report because that's when you get
like the seasonal layoffs and the start
of 2025 layoffs although by November and
the end of October you should already
have the war notices for people who are
supposed to get fired in January so
that's why I really think the end of
October is going to be really really
interesting like I wouldn't be surprised
to see a lot of earnings where they're
like yeah we missed on earnings and
we're going to lay off a bunch of people
in January oopsies Maybe not maybe
earnings will will surprise nicely but
you know it's not going to take a lot to
get these Bulls to flip and once we get
nasty unemployment data that's when they
flip and then it's too late to try to
pick up a hedge you know I look like I
know I had a great day trade today I I I
doubled you know my money in in day
trade I don't know it was like it was
somewhere between $25 or $30,000 which
is great that's a freaking great day I
don't always have great days I can't
guarantee that the days are always going
to be like that but it was it was a good
trade and and I hope to send more alerts
like that that's my goal and if you want
to see what I'm trading make sure you
use that flash sale coupon code that's
going on but but also how I'm
positioning with Hedges and how I talk
about Hedges on a daily basis not shorts
but hedges so let's see what's going on
with jobs so the jobs report comes out
the beginning of October let me see if
there's an estimate for it yet
unemployment rate it's expected to stay
flat at 4.2 dude change in private
payrolls is expected to be 120 change in
nonfarm payrolls expect to be 140 if for
some reason you get like a 95,000 or
like a sub 100 handle this markets get
freaking
tank yeah I don't know because you don't
actually need like think about this for
a moment unemployment claims are
generally aligned with the unemployment
rate going up but you could actually
have a stable unemployment
rate and potentially see less hiring if
people are just more sticky at their
jobs and I think that's still going to
be enough to create some poopy dopiness
so I'm nervous for the volatility I'm
watching what the Bulls are doing every
single day I'm trying to read what the
Bulls are saying cuz trust me I I got
the bear case down all right folks I
love you all we'll see you in the next
one hey what you got Ken I'm ready for
you can not advertise these things that
you told us here I feel like nobody else
knows about this we'll we'll try a
little advertising and see how it goes
congratulations man you have done so
much people love you people look up to
you Kevin P there financial analyst and
YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get
your
take even though I'm a licensed
financial adviser licensed real estate
broker and becoming a stock broker this
video is not personalized advice for you
it is not tax legal or otherwise
personalized advice tailor to you this
video provides generalized perspective
information and commentary any third
party content I show shall not be deemed
endorsed by me this video is not and
shall never be deemed reasonably
sufficient information for the purposes
of evaluating a security or investment
decision any links or promoted products
are either paid affiliations or products
or Services we may benefit from I also
personally operate an actively managed
ETF I may personally hold or otherwise
hold long or short positions in various
Securities potentially including those
mentioned in this video however I have
no relationship to any issuer other than
house act nor am I presently acting as a
market maker make sure if you're
considering investing in house Haack to
always read the PPM at house.com
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.