TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Jerome Powell Problem | Bull Flippening.

28m 7s5,307 words739 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

hey take a look at this this is a bull

0:02

okay A lot of people are asking me Hey

0:04

Kevin can you cover more bullish stuff

0:06

are you always bearish I'm like no many

0:09

of you know I'm not always bearish I've

0:10

been bearish since July and I expect to

0:12

be bearish until at least right before

0:14

the election and and then trust me I

0:16

want to go back to being a bull okay

0:17

it's a lot easier but at least in the

0:18

meantime people are asking me Kevin like

0:20

hey you know can you give us like some

0:23

kind of like bull hope at least to look

0:25

at and I thought okay yeah let's look at

0:27

TS Lombard uh and the reason like TS

0:30

Lombard is because this team over here

0:32

they're generally generally more bullish

0:36

uh than than what I see by others out on

0:39

Wall Street uh and I like balancing My

0:42

Views to theirs you know for example uh

0:45

Dario Perkins over here starts with I've

0:47

been in the soft Landing camp for a

0:49

while and he's not going to abandon it

0:52

now okay all right so we kind of know

0:54

where this is getting started right uh

0:56

he's telling us hey look I'm a soft

0:58

Landing guy and these guys are

1:00

professional wall streeters I I love

1:03

their Insight honestly I recommend

1:04

everybody check out TS Lombard it's #n

1:07

notsponsored I I just like reading them

1:09

like when I see their name pop up I'm

1:10

like oh I wonder what they have to say

1:12

hopefully it's kind of like that for you

1:14

for me where it's like oh me Kevin video

1:17

hopefully you come and learn new things

1:19

every time right that's the goal uh so I

1:21

was reading this last night and I'm like

1:24

oh I was not expecting this so uh I want

1:28

you to see how he's net bullish but some

1:31

issues that are coming up for them take

1:33

a look at this so I'm not going to

1:35

abandon it now especially after the feds

1:37

50 basis point cut mind you with this 50

1:40

basis point cut here there are a lot of

1:42

people on Wall Street that say the left

1:45

tail has been eliminated by uh the

1:48

Federal Reserve I actually think that's

1:50

a pretty crazy um how should I put it um

1:55

complacent thing to say I don't think

1:58

the left tail is ever removed

2:00

but there were some analysts on Wall

2:01

Street I was reading they're like oh the

2:03

Federal Reserve basically said look we

2:05

cannot go to the left the left is down

2:08

right this is the down Market this is

2:10

sad this is like hyper runaway melt up

2:15

amazing bullish economy uh and then you

2:17

know this is your sort of middle

2:19

standard deviations here right middle

2:21

standard deviation one standard

2:22

deviation two okay simple the left tail

2:25

is like everything goes to poopy doopy

2:27

and uh this analyst I was reading

2:29

earlier today they're like oh the fed's

2:31

eliminated the left tail risk no left

2:33

tail risk this is great and I'm like no

2:35

no no no the FED has not eliminated a

2:38

left tail risk until they cut rates by

2:40

200 basis points in an emergency

2:42

capitulation capitulation cut and then

2:45

they cut another 20000 basis points and

2:46

we're basically back under 1% you know

2:49

then I think the Federal Reserve has

2:51

actually stopped the left tail risk now

2:52

maybe they're signaling that they would

2:54

be willing to do that but I don't think

2:56

they would be willing to do that until

2:57

you have some serious pain in Market KS

3:00

so uh you know point of that right is is

3:03

just to say like hey you know the FED

3:06

could be there to bail you out but the

3:08

fed's not going to capitulate and bail

3:10

you out until something breaks and

3:12

something actually has like a lot of

3:13

pain for a while the downside of that is

3:16

if something has a lot of pain for a

3:17

while it means valuations are are

3:19

typically lower right uh this is why

3:21

sometimes on days like today I kind of

3:23

just like uh trading you know this

3:24

morning I threw in uh right when data

3:27

came out we talked about it I threw in

3:28

this see 7 a.m. is even where my

3:30

screenshot is I threw in this order here

3:32

5 seconds after the data came out you

3:34

could look at that timing 82 Cent

3:37

purchase on the cues uh and this was my

3:39

Tesla S sell which I made some profit on

3:41

that which was nice but look at that I

3:43

sold it for 159 which was nearly a

3:46

double and I hit Buy on that I send a

3:49

notification to everybody in my Discord

3:51

puts and CNBC comes on like a minute

3:54

later they start tanking the freaking

3:56

Market was like kind of funny uh you got

3:59

to beat CNBC to the news uh but anyway

4:03

we try to do more of that I think that's

4:05

that's always entertaining uh remember

4:06

we have a flash sale in honor of that

4:08

called Data double going on until uh the

4:12

end of the day today and that trade held

4:15

its value for for like another 20

4:17

minutes or so so like you didn't have to

4:19

be really fast on jumping out uh but uh

4:22

but eventually we did end up bottoming

4:23

out on the cues and it it was important

4:25

to cover but anyway take a look at this

4:28

they say I'm not going to abandon after

4:30

the 50 you know especially after the

4:31

feds 50 that's fine uh it's a commitment

4:34

to not fall behind the curve blah blah

4:36

blah but there are a couple things that

4:37

are bothering me I'm like oh interesting

4:39

a bull getting bothered that's that's

4:41

rare usually it's just like hey it's

4:44

just going to go straight up recent

4:46

labor market trends covering in depth uh

4:49

covered in depth we've been talking

4:50

about these already uh and the sudden

4:53

rather surprising relapse in global

4:55

manufacturing okay so both of these

4:57

matter we've been covering these either

4:58

in the manufa facturing isms we've been

5:01

covering them in the labor market the uh

5:03

attemp layoffs the peing out of

5:06

government and education employes the

5:08

peaking out of job openings the number

5:10

of people who are 27 weeks unemployed

5:12

look that up Google that one and it's

5:14

I'm telling you it looks like you're in

5:16

a recession but anyway uh uh and then a

5:19

third thing that bothers him central

5:21

banks taking Victory laps okay

5:23

interesting so he's a bull and he's like

5:25

hm we're starting to face some problems

5:27

here labor market trends Manu facturing

5:31

and then the Federal Reserve basically

5:32

trying to say everything's fine we're

5:34

winning I actually agree with this I

5:36

think these Victory laps are somewhat

5:38

hubris and I was a little nervous that I

5:40

I feel like Drome Powell is holding back

5:43

the concerns he truly has and he's like

5:46

don't worry everything's fine to

5:47

purposefully pump the markets because he

5:50

realizes that if the stock market's up

5:52

you have a lower chance of getting

5:53

layoffs but but you're built on fugazi

5:55

foundations then yeah it's not great but

5:58

anyway the cycle that fooled the

6:00

consensus this has not been a normal

6:02

business cycle and they talk about how

6:03

leading indicators have given false

6:05

signals like postco manufacturing

6:08

recession uh this was not a sign of a

6:10

broader economic crash the Phillips

6:13

curve was wrong the Philips curve was

6:14

suggesting we should have had interest

6:15

rates up at like 9 or 10% uh people

6:18

thought a recession would be needed to

6:19

cure inflation no it's just once you

6:22

start lapping the price increases

6:24

everything's adjusted up wow all of a

6:25

sudden you don't need more inflation

6:27

unless you're printing more money okay

6:28

we we knew that that's fine this is why

6:30

we've been talking Nike SW recovery for

6:31

a while B baverage curve this this has

6:34

to do with the labor market expanding

6:37

labor force participation yield curve

6:39

predicts policy easings not necessarily

6:41

recession well the problem is usually

6:44

when you come out of recession you

6:45

predict a lot of easing it's because you

6:47

are pricing in a recession we're still

6:49

not there yet usually you don't start a

6:52

recession until you're 50 to 90 basis

6:54

points uninverted and uh we're at about

6:57

20 right now partial debt sustain ility

7:00

blah blah blah okay so the biggest error

7:03

so far postco in calling for a recession

7:06

has been underestimating the resilience

7:08

of Labor markets or believing that

7:10

central banks would have to destroy

7:11

labor markets to get inflation down

7:13

which would cause a recession even now

7:15

there's still a chance that people are

7:17

misleading or misreading labor market

7:19

trends here I want to focus on a

7:21

different issue Global manufacturing two

7:25

years ago it was easy to dismiss the

7:27

weakness in manufacturing as a head fake

7:30

okay so basically let me show this to

7:32

you on the map when you go down you go

7:35

down because of covid okay this this

7:36

makes logical sense when you come back

7:39

up you go up because everybody's

7:40

printing money like crazy and then of

7:42

course you're going to have a

7:43

year-over-year comparison so you're

7:44

going to have some volatility after the

7:46

you know the remarkable recovery what

7:49

he's most concerned about right now

7:51

beyond the labor market weakening which

7:53

we've already covered on the channel is

7:56

this right here this is his second big

7:59

concern

8:00

he's going wait a minute this latest

8:02

deterioration is actually more

8:05

concerning this chart is in his words

8:08

and he's a bull he's a soft Landing bull

8:10

particularly ugly okay that's not good

8:13

because this now means you've got the

8:15

labor market that's poopy doopy and now

8:18

you've got manufacturing that's turning

8:20

poopy doopy that's not great this is a

8:22

lot of poopy

8:23

dupies uh and then of course you know

8:26

you have uh the the oil Market that you

8:29

know yeah it bounced today because of

8:32

Chinese stimulus I mean we we we knew

8:34

the Chinese stimulus was coming we

8:35

weren't expecting it to be this big this

8:37

was great wonder what oil ended up

8:39

but the oil Market is signaling some

8:43

distress it might be the same distress

8:45

that you get someone like a Jamie

8:46

Diamond arguing about of like H you know

8:49

the market is pricing in Perfection I

8:51

think I'm going to sit on the sidelines

8:53

for this one that's what Jamie Diamond

8:55

says now maybe it's because he's getting

8:56

ready to retire or go on to I don't know

8:58

make a spack or something who knows but

9:01

uh you know it's saying something when

9:03

some of these big boys are like I don't

9:04

know man this is getting a little silly

9:06

but yeah look oil markets bottom to a

9:08

three and a half year low two weeks ago

9:10

today uh actually I think it was 15 days

9:13

ago but whatever you've had a nice

9:14

rebound from 69 to 75 but you're talking

9:18

an 89% rebound cool you're still way

9:21

lower than where you have been I mean

9:23

here's the chart that they they've given

9:24

on this uh and and this does signal uh a

9:28

downtrend uh either if you draw it like

9:31

this or frankly you look at uh you know

9:33

this sort of ceiling of highs that

9:35

you're getting this downtrend here you

9:38

know this is this is certainly

9:39

recessionary and it's again a sign of

9:41

weakening manufacturing base 18 months

9:45

ago we could basically ignore what's

9:46

happening in the global industrial cycle

9:49

reopening from the pandemic had caused a

9:50

massive pivot from Goods to services and

9:53

blah blah blah this triggered a huge

9:54

bull whip effect in inventories and

9:57

Manufacturing weakness didn't tell us

9:58

anything but now he's kind of like I

10:01

don't know now now we might be a little

10:03

bit in sort of a leading indicator issue

10:05

see this is why he shows up this uh us

10:08

leading indicator six-month annual

10:10

change and if you notice we've recovered

10:12

here in the leading indicator but we're

10:15

already starting to inflect back down so

10:18

it's like was was this drop right here

10:21

just sort of counterbalancing the run

10:23

but now we're inflecting back down

10:25

that's what he's looking at then he

10:27

looks he says over here so what's going

10:29

on is this a sudden relapse and not part

10:31

of the original fake cycle is this

10:33

something to worry about is it a sign of

10:35

monetary tightening finally starting to

10:38

bite maybe by the way you know that

10:40

would be a way of saying uh that

10:42

suddenly you've got a Federal Reserve

10:44

that has actually tightened because

10:46

inflation has fallen so much and even

10:48

though they're not raising rates anymore

10:50

the excess increase in rates that we

10:52

have is is leading to a tighter

10:54

environment but Global manufacturing

10:56

capacity

10:57

utilization this is we

10:59

they're basically pointing out here like

11:01

wait a minute why are we normalizing

11:03

here we should not be capping out here

11:05

because if we draw a line from where we

11:07

are and we draw it all the way back and

11:10

then you kind of just draw cross points

11:12

you're as bad as you were in

11:15

2012 uh over here in 2005 coming out of

11:18

the 2001 recession going into the Great

11:21

Recession uh you know close to almost a

11:24

brief low over here in uh 2015 uh and

11:27

then 2019 so so you're at at a pretty

11:29

low normal level if this is supposed to

11:32

be a return to normal this is odd

11:35

obviously China's uh economy looks worse

11:37

than people have ever seen before but

11:39

then again we got you know stimulus uh

11:42

today uh so so who knows maybe uh maybe

11:45

maybe that'll you know all of a sudden

11:47

help China uh but and and and spring up

11:51

manufacturing demand is what they're

11:52

suggesting but then again would would it

11:54

support Chinese manufacturing or us

11:56

manufacturing right probably Chinese

11:58

Manufacturing

11:59

uh but anyway after two two years of

12:02

listen to this after two years of

12:04

talking down recession

12:07

scares I'm conscious that I might

12:10

finally be overplaying my hand listen to

12:13

that a bull is saying damn okay if

12:17

you're bullish he's B basically here's

12:18

what he's doing if you're bull he's

12:20

saying

12:21

look we we might still stick to soft

12:24

Landing but we should really start

12:26

paying attention to labor I mean we saw

12:29

what happened in the ism report

12:31

yesterday Manufacturing Services

12:33

composite all lower than expected not

12:35

great the Beats were nominal and the

12:37

lows were low we saw what happened in

12:39

the Challenger report from a couple

12:41

weeks ago that was a horrible jobs

12:43

report we saw what happened this morning

12:45

on the conference board uh estimates not

12:47

good this is just some of the recent

12:49

data it just sort of compounds what

12:51

you've been seeing beige book nine out

12:53

of 12 sectors weakening this is

12:55

problematic but what does he say here as

12:58

I keep saying we are a more I think he

13:01

meant to say in a more but as I keep

13:04

saying we are in a more precarious

13:06

situation now and it is unsettling to

13:10

see Central Bankers do victory dances

13:12

okay this is this is a big one because I

13:16

I want you to just for a moment think

13:17

about

13:18

this when when Central Bankers do a

13:21

victory dance they're basically telling

13:24

you it's okay if interest rates go up

13:27

but wait a minute

13:29

now you're not fighting the

13:32

manufacturing pain or the jobs pain

13:34

because you just let yields rise which

13:36

is like fully dumb like I want to say

13:40

you know a word I shouldn't be saying

13:41

but it's basically it's kind of like

13:43

fully our word okay like we shouldn't be

13:45

saying or even referencing these things

13:48

but for the Federal Reserve to suggest

13:51

that oh we've declared Victory

13:53

everything's good and then all of a

13:55

sudden you see this jump and yields you

13:57

are tightening

13:59

on top of Labor Market weakness and

14:01

Manufacturing weakness that is full dumb

14:05

and why does the market keep rewarding

14:07

the fed well

14:08

because the FED is performing a victory

14:11

dance central bank hubris is definitely

14:15

top of cycle stuff yeah that's not a

14:19

good line uh and this is a bull this is

14:22

this is the full bull here but it isn't

14:24

time to panic yet not until the Perkins

14:26

rule triggers okay the Perkins rule is

14:28

sort of his version of the PS Rule and

14:30

he's like the PS rule might be triggered

14:32

but the Perkins rule hasn't triggered it

14:35

you know and then actually compares to

14:36

mrss too this is his rule on

14:38

unemployment he's like it hasn't hit yet

14:41

okay that's fine that that's fine but

14:44

let's just be clear a bull is like

14:47

things are still okay but we do have

14:50

problems let me show you quickly the

14:52

Perkins rule so you could see it here so

14:54

this is the Perkins rule Revisited from

14:56

August uh 26th

14:59

and let's just go right to his

15:01

definition of the Perkins rule so

15:05

basically what you have here is how does

15:07

the Perkins rule compare to the S rule

15:09

it certainly has more false positives

15:12

okay so so this is important because if

15:14

he's if the Perkins rule triggers it's

15:16

bad and he's saying his rule has more

15:19

false positives while it is rare for us

15:22

payrolls to decline outside of

15:24

recessions it does happen occasionally

15:27

usually this is due to obvious

15:29

distortions such as extreme weather but

15:32

it also happened during the famous soft

15:34

Landing in 1995 when a shockingly bad

15:37

employment report later revised prompted

15:40

Allen Greenspan to cut rates it also

15:43

happened in the late 60s okay well hold

15:45

on a second in 1995 you may have briefly

15:49

had a strong labor report but in 1995

15:52

1994 95 and 96 if you read the Federal

15:55

Reserve Open Market Committee

15:56

transcripts you will find what I saw as

15:58

well which is for those three years they

16:00

do nothing but talk about how the labor

16:02

market is so freaking tight we might be

16:04

causing a wage price spiral and they

16:07

only cut rates because they're like all

16:08

right we don't see the wage price spiral

16:10

yet the jobs Market's pretty tight but

16:12

you know and people aren't going out

16:14

there to hire they actually called some

16:15

businesses discouraged as as a reason

16:18

for why they weren't hiring uh but

16:20

anyway so then you look at this and he

16:22

goes okay Perkins rule over here sees

16:24

the uh Perkins rule fals positive in

16:27

1995 and and over there in the 60s so

16:30

it's clearly less functional than the

16:32

PSM rule uh but let's let's read what he

16:35

says the Perkins rule isn't fullprof but

16:37

that's not the point the important thing

16:39

is that when you look at every time the

16:40

P rule is triggered since World War II

16:43

there were only three occasions where

16:45

payrolls were not already negative 1970

16:51

1974 and

16:53

1980 usually when the S rule triggers

16:56

the Perkins rule has already triggered

16:58

that matters because it's the opposite

17:00

of what's happening today the latest

17:03

triggering of the P rule looks very

17:05

different to the average recessionary

17:08

experience so he's making an argument

17:11

here that basically I mean I hate to say

17:13

it but this time is different but he is

17:14

also saying that like hey if if we TR if

17:16

this should be a bad flag our our our

17:20

indicator should have already been

17:21

firing even if it's a false positive it

17:23

should have fired before the Som Rule

17:25

and so you know his rule is made up of

17:27

of slightly different measures and we we

17:30

don't know how useful or functional it

17:32

actually is but I want again you to show

17:35

or or you to see why uh is he saying

17:38

this just to be clear because I I don't

17:40

think I actually say it as clearly in

17:41

this video so I wanted to edit this in

17:43

just to add a little bit more clarity

17:44

the Perkins rule is when the

17:46

unemployment report comes in negative

17:50

now why is that important well the

17:53

Perkins rule basically Triggers on a

17:55

very simple basis it's when the

17:57

unemployment Port whatever it is comes

18:00

out and it comes in with any negative

18:04

read so that is going to introduce a lot

18:08

more volatility so if we go jobs report

18:11

St Louis Fred let's just say and uh we

18:15

get the uh change uh in payrolls we

18:19

could just open up the chart and look

18:21

and go all right cool when is it

18:24

negative and how often does it go

18:26

negative well an easy way to do that is

18:28

you look for the change in thousands of

18:31

people on a monthly frequency so you

18:34

just have to edit that a little bit on

18:36

the uh St Louis Fred website and once

18:39

you do that uh then you could actually

18:42

see how noisy it could be that you're

18:44

negative so uh it's a little easier to

18:47

get rid of the pandemic here because

18:49

then you could see over here oh look you

18:51

were actually negative in 2003 uh in

18:54

April of 2003 but the FED had already

18:56

capitulated at this point you know you

18:58

were bailing out you you were leaving

18:59

the market at the point you had a

19:01

negative report it looks like here 1997

19:05

-2k you had a negative report right

19:07

there - 7,000 in 1996 so that's another

19:10

false flag you had a uh- 15,000 over

19:14

here I I don't know that these oneoff

19:16

hits are that useful because look how

19:19

many false reads you get false false

19:22

false false false false false false is

19:26

Perkins rule like by the time we get the

19:28

Perkins rule in this economy we're going

19:30

to have some major problems because look

19:32

at this what you're really looking for

19:35

now is this downtrend that's happening

19:37

here right I mean even if you don't

19:40

believe in technical analysis I think we

19:42

could all argue these are lower highs

19:46

and lower lows it's a down Channel now

19:50

in case that's not particularly obvious

19:52

let's just smooth this out to the

19:55

quarterly okay is that more obvious of

19:59

downtrend let's go let's go

20:02

semiannual do you see the

20:06

downtrend now uh keep in mind we only

20:08

have the first half on here so it

20:10

doesn't actually show the deterioration

20:12

yet uh in the second quarter and so when

20:14

you throw that in you get that other

20:16

pull down over here so it doesn't look

20:18

that flat and then obviously if you go

20:20

out onto the monthly uh you could see

20:22

you know we are somewhat stabilizing

20:24

there in that June July August period

20:27

but a lot of people at this going come

20:29

on man this crap's probably already

20:31

negative anyway we can't believe their

20:33

numbers but imagine if their crazy

20:36

numbers go

20:38

negative ooh it's going to be dirty the

20:41

trend is not your friend and the Perkins

20:44

rule is probably going to trigger pretty

20:46

dang soon unless of course you think 150

20:48

BP cut all of a sudden is going to lead

20:50

to some boom in in hiring so I actually

20:53

wrote this down you know a few weeks ago

20:55

and he says uh there are several

20:56

problems interpreting the psalm rule

20:58

today this is is not a regular business

20:59

cycle again this is this time is

21:01

different the jobless rate comes from

21:02

many from the household survey which

21:04

looks artificially weak compared to

21:06

payrolls and so this is where I say many

21:08

would dispute this given the households

21:11

was more accurate post the BLS revisions

21:13

so I'm actually kind of you know

21:15

suggesting here that like hey like maybe

21:18

the household survey is actually more

21:20

accurate but than the you know payrolls

21:22

report but all the data is just a mess

21:24

it's hard to know what to believe strong

21:25

labor force growth has driven most of

21:28

the rise in the unemployment rate it is

21:30

harder to tell a reflexivity story when

21:33

employment is still growing so this

21:35

right here is a labor force

21:36

participation reference that you know

21:38

even if the participation rate stays the

21:39

same if you have a larger group of

21:42

people participating then you actually

21:45

have more employment but it looks like

21:46

the unemployment rate is going up so

21:49

this is where he's saying I'm not saying

21:51

everything is great investors should

21:52

fade the RW he's just saying the US

21:54

Labor Market does look increasingly

21:56

precarious and is not great when you go

21:58

into every employment report wondering

22:00

if this data is going to show gener you

22:02

know actual cracks genuine cracks the

22:04

FED needs to get ahead of this remember

22:06

this is from uh um you know about three

22:09

weeks ago but the point again of showing

22:11

you this was just to say that his take

22:14

is the Perkins rule hasn't triggered yet

22:17

and the Perkins rule is going to trigger

22:20

if you end up getting substantially

22:23

lower payroll reads in other words we

22:25

could just be one payroll report away

22:27

from his per Rule triggering and then

22:31

you're you're starting to get to where

22:33

you're triggering every kind of uh of of

22:37

recessionary warning signal you could

22:39

potentially ask for uh

22:42

so uh anyway uh he says uh just so you

22:46

see it here uh the Perkins rule the idea

22:48

that it is a cont contraction in

22:50

employment that signals recession not a

22:52

gradual trick trickle higher in the

22:54

jobless rate right right right right so

22:57

but this gradual contraction employment

23:01

is already what we're

23:02

seeing from the Challenger report from

23:05

the ism reports from the conference

23:07

board reports so anyway out of all of

23:12

this what do I think like what's my

23:14

bottom line takeaway I'm watching this

23:16

guy because he's a bull and I think he's

23:19

got logic I I agree with his tools I

23:23

agree it like things are really

23:25

concerning when it comes to labor right

23:27

now but I also agree that there is a

23:29

shot at a soft Landing he probably puts

23:32

a soft landing at you know a 60% chance

23:35

you know I put a recession at more like

23:37

a 70% chance so we're kind of flipped on

23:40

that but when that guy capitulates and

23:43

goes

23:44

bearish that that's that's when I know

23:47

it's uh it's about to get real and so

23:49

we're not quite there yet but as you can

23:52

see the way he talks you know in his in

23:54

his report three weeks ago he's like I

23:56

don't want to you know like play down

23:58

the r word and then what's he saying

24:01

this time this time he's going uh three

24:06

things are bothering me the sudden

24:08

rather surprising relapse in

24:10

manufacturing labor market trends and

24:12

top of cycle stuff like the Fed so again

24:17

uh like when you combine all of this I

24:18

just can't help myself but go like I

24:21

don't know man is this time to fomo by

24:23

right now is this fomo like all in

24:26

like I think the risk is way hi uh if if

24:30

we can get give me like two or three

24:32

labor reports you know give me give me

24:34

the September labor report from what I'm

24:36

seeing is going to be trash uh let me

24:38

see if the estimates are out by the way

24:40

give me the September labor report give

24:42

me the October labor report in November

24:44

and maybe even the December labor report

24:47

and if you really want to be sure

24:48

there's no recession give me the January

24:51

labor report because that's when you get

24:52

like the seasonal layoffs and the start

24:54

of 2025 layoffs although by November and

24:57

the end of October you should already

24:58

have the war notices for people who are

25:00

supposed to get fired in January so

25:02

that's why I really think the end of

25:04

October is going to be really really

25:05

interesting like I wouldn't be surprised

25:06

to see a lot of earnings where they're

25:07

like yeah we missed on earnings and

25:09

we're going to lay off a bunch of people

25:10

in January oopsies Maybe not maybe

25:13

earnings will will surprise nicely but

25:16

you know it's not going to take a lot to

25:18

get these Bulls to flip and once we get

25:21

nasty unemployment data that's when they

25:23

flip and then it's too late to try to

25:26

pick up a hedge you know I look like I

25:28

know I had a great day trade today I I I

25:30

doubled you know my money in in day

25:32

trade I don't know it was like it was

25:34

somewhere between $25 or $30,000 which

25:36

is great that's a freaking great day I

25:39

don't always have great days I can't

25:40

guarantee that the days are always going

25:41

to be like that but it was it was a good

25:43

trade and and I hope to send more alerts

25:45

like that that's my goal and if you want

25:46

to see what I'm trading make sure you

25:48

use that flash sale coupon code that's

25:50

going on but but also how I'm

25:52

positioning with Hedges and how I talk

25:54

about Hedges on a daily basis not shorts

25:57

but hedges so let's see what's going on

25:59

with jobs so the jobs report comes out

26:01

the beginning of October let me see if

26:04

there's an estimate for it yet

26:05

unemployment rate it's expected to stay

26:08

flat at 4.2 dude change in private

26:12

payrolls is expected to be 120 change in

26:14

nonfarm payrolls expect to be 140 if for

26:17

some reason you get like a 95,000 or

26:20

like a sub 100 handle this markets get

26:22

freaking

26:23

tank yeah I don't know because you don't

26:26

actually need like think about this for

26:29

a moment unemployment claims are

26:32

generally aligned with the unemployment

26:34

rate going up but you could actually

26:37

have a stable unemployment

26:39

rate and potentially see less hiring if

26:43

people are just more sticky at their

26:44

jobs and I think that's still going to

26:46

be enough to create some poopy dopiness

26:48

so I'm nervous for the volatility I'm

26:50

watching what the Bulls are doing every

26:52

single day I'm trying to read what the

26:53

Bulls are saying cuz trust me I I got

26:55

the bear case down all right folks I

26:58

love you all we'll see you in the next

27:01

one hey what you got Ken I'm ready for

27:03

you can not advertise these things that

27:05

you told us here I feel like nobody else

27:07

knows about this we'll we'll try a

27:08

little advertising and see how it goes

27:10

congratulations man you have done so

27:11

much people love you people look up to

27:13

you Kevin P there financial analyst and

27:16

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

27:18

your

27:19

take even though I'm a licensed

27:20

financial adviser licensed real estate

27:22

broker and becoming a stock broker this

27:23

video is not personalized advice for you

27:25

it is not tax legal or otherwise

27:26

personalized advice tailor to you this

27:28

video provides generalized perspective

27:29

information and commentary any third

27:31

party content I show shall not be deemed

27:33

endorsed by me this video is not and

27:35

shall never be deemed reasonably

27:37

sufficient information for the purposes

27:38

of evaluating a security or investment

27:40

decision any links or promoted products

27:41

are either paid affiliations or products

27:43

or Services we may benefit from I also

27:45

personally operate an actively managed

27:47

ETF I may personally hold or otherwise

27:49

hold long or short positions in various

27:51

Securities potentially including those

27:53

mentioned in this video however I have

27:54

no relationship to any issuer other than

27:56

house act nor am I presently acting as a

27:58

market maker make sure if you're

27:59

considering investing in house Haack to

28:01

always read the PPM at house.com

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.