TRANSCRIPTEnglish

DOGE Stimulus Checks are Coming

12m 35s2,403 words338 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:01

hey it's me Kevin I just landed uh back

0:03

from my check ride becoming an

0:05

instrument pilot and I saw this notice

0:07

that potentially there are talks that

0:10

maybe the Doge team and Donald Trump

0:12

could maybe be in talks to issue some

0:15

kind of Doge refund uh to American

0:20

taxpayers uh and uh this is really

0:22

interesting because I've been studying a

0:24

lot of what Doge has been doing and what

0:26

Doge hasn't been doing and you know I'm

0:29

a big fan of cutting waste where there's

0:31

waste to be cut and a huge fan of

0:34

transparency and so this suggestion

0:38

though is a GameChanger this this

0:41

changes everything because all of a

0:43

sudden now what you're doing is you're

0:47

actually

0:49

aligning Doge with really what I think

0:52

Americans were inspired by and that is

0:56

what we save we will help give back to

0:58

you now this has of course been

1:01

confuddled in the media with this idea

1:03

that well I mean discretionary budget of

1:05

the United States is only you know uh

1:07

20% or 25% of the US government spending

1:10

50% goes to entitlement programs which I

1:13

mean we paid into them so of course

1:14

we're entitled to them uh and and then

1:16

you know a bunch goes to well I mean

1:18

about 25% goes to the military and then

1:20

we've got discretionary funds and some

1:21

of those things we got to pay for a good

1:23

portion of our budget it goes to just

1:25

paying for this unsustainable national

1:27

debt that we

1:28

have but I think I think a big fear was

1:31

that a it wouldn't be feasible to

1:34

actually see real Cuts uh like

1:36

meaningful you know I mean look you kill

1:38

usid usaid great awesome there's there

1:42

you know kill all forign

1:43

a it it amounts to

1:46

$196 refund if you will per uh person

1:51

living in America right per citizen in

1:54

America or or green card resident or

1:56

taxpayer however you want to look at it

1:58

so uh the difference is nominal however

2:02

uh this suggestion about uh going deeper

2:06

and saying hey you know what we've

2:08

actually taxed you too much and we're

2:12

now going

2:13

to try to find a way to get back to

2:16

essentially a smaller form of government

2:18

uh in and exchange give it back to the

2:22

American taxpayers in the form of a tax

2:24

refund this is actually quite brilliant

2:26

because see government spending is

2:30

almost intentionally wasteful one of the

2:33

reasons it's almost intentionally

2:34

wasteful and I'm not you know Shilling

2:36

for government spending but anyways but

2:37

one of the reasons government spending

2:39

is intentionally

2:41

wasteful is because it's so wasteful

2:44

that it actually becomes stimulative so

2:47

if you're getting showered your NGO or

2:51

whatever government contract is getting

2:52

showered in this government money and

2:54

the government actually isn't getting

2:55

their value for it yeah technically

2:57

that's a dead weight loss because you're

2:59

actually taking taking $100 from you

3:01

with taxes you're giving it to the

3:03

government who then you know deficit

3:05

spends $150 but maybe only $90 actually

3:09

go into GDP spending that's still $90 of

3:11

stimulus so they basically took a $90

3:13

stimulus check from you and give it to

3:15

somebody else so there is a dead weight

3:17

loss in government spending inherently

3:20

and I'm not a proponent of zero

3:21

government but uh the capitalistic POV

3:24

whether you're a Keynesian or Austrian

3:26

the the bottom line is the Keynesian or

3:28

Austrian view so no matter which

3:30

economic model you look at when we look

3:32

at capitalism we generally see that

3:34

smaller government equals less dead

3:36

weight loss now the canian argue that uh

3:39

the government intervention and that

3:40

dead weight loss for some is worth it

3:43

for the benefit of others right such as

3:45

this idea that well maybe the government

3:47

can uh minimize the the uh like put a

3:49

lid on an economic boom so you don't

3:52

have sort of a 2008 bubble or 2005

3:55

bubble up right uh and and then we try

3:57

to stimulate in the low times and we try

3:59

to minim ups and downs austrians are

4:01

like n man let the free market economy

4:03

handle it and it's fine they're both

4:05

economic schools of thought based on on

4:07

this idea of capitalism not Socialism or

4:09

Marxism or

4:10

whatever but if you think as uh or if

4:14

you think of government spending whether

4:16

it's to excuse me whether it's to uh

4:19

foreign aid or whether it's to some NGO

4:23

or whether it's to some government

4:24

contract that's really frivolous like

4:26

it's for $150 you know soap dispensers

4:28

in uh military B

4:31

that wasteful form of government

4:33

spending is so bad that it actually

4:35

turns into stimulus whether that is in

4:37

the form of corporate profits and then

4:39

share BuyBacks and corporate Executives

4:41

getting rich and and blowing money uh or

4:43

or the people who are receiving the

4:45

contracts the people who are receiving

4:46

the pay or the people who work for the

4:47

government who there are some obviously

4:49

who just can't justify their existence

4:51

or they don't do anything hopefully

4:52

that's part of the smaller minority but

4:54

who knows I guess we'll find out when we

4:56

actually get more transparent details

4:58

but see really

5:01

I believe this is a massive Game Changer

5:02

because when you say look rather than me

5:06

tax you the $100 why I just give you the

5:08

hundred bucks back and then not tax you

5:10

that $100 next year well then in effect

5:14

you are not stimulating to the tune of

5:16

that $90 because you don't have that

5:17

dead weight loss that Delta we talked

5:18

about instead you're stimulating to the

5:20

tune of $100 so really you could

5:22

actually potentially grow the economy

5:25

see one concern that a lot of folks have

5:27

uh rightfully so is that hey if if

5:29

Government spending contributes over 47%

5:32

of gross domestic product now obviously

5:34

we know consumers make up 70 is% of the

5:37

Govern of of GDP but if that is funneled

5:41

in you know to the tune of 47% by

5:45

government spending again through

5:47

entitlement programs or whatever uh or

5:49

or just like even uh you know sub

5:52

substenance spending you know food

5:54

stamps or whatever it is point is if

5:56

government spending contributes to half

5:58

of GDP

6:00

then let's just pick a number let's I

6:02

mean maybe it's 47% but let's just make

6:03

it easy let's say it's 50% but let's say

6:05

that comes with a dead weight loss of 5%

6:07

because the government is inefficient

6:09

maybe it's even more than that dead

6:10

weight loss maybe it's a 10% dead weight

6:11

loss right instead you return that to

6:14

Americans well then you potentially

6:16

actually have this boost of 5 or 10% of

6:18

spending so instead of government you

6:20

know facilitating 50% of GDP they could

6:23

actually in fact be facilitating 60% of

6:26

GDP so you could actually see a GDP

6:28

explosion and an optimism boom in that

6:32

people are going to get tax less and

6:33

they keep more of their own money this

6:35

is something I could really get behind

6:37

this I like the idea of you know Rich

6:42

suits in Silicon Valley collecting more

6:44

of uh you know government cuts to line

6:47

their own interests like yeah build

6:49

those AI chip factories for us and yeah

6:53

give more stimulus to our you know

6:55

government contracted and government

6:57

supported entities that me a little the

7:00

wrong way because it I feel like you're

7:02

robbing the you know the the core

7:05

American the person making you know ends

7:08

meet by working their ass off and prices

7:11

are going up and they're frustrated and

7:12

they're pissed off and they're seeing

7:14

crime go unpunished uh so uh this idea

7:19

essentially of a tax refund or tax

7:21

stimulus you know you're going to have

7:23

some people argue oh my gosh it's going

7:25

to be inflationary which yeah I mean if

7:27

it's not measured in the way it's

7:28

provided could be inflationary but

7:31

remember I'm actually a believer that

7:33

the reason we had a lot of the inflation

7:35

that we had is because we had uh Supply

7:38

chains that weren't really built out

7:39

they weren't prepared for the type of

7:41

volume of orders that actually came

7:42

during covid especially when people were

7:44

making money for doing nothing and so

7:47

what's interesting is now we actually

7:48

have an over supply of factories and

7:51

businesses that are ready and willing to

7:53

serve Americans with more money so if

7:56

the it's kind of like imagine you gained

7:59

500 pound and you were still alive and

8:01

then you lost it all really rapidly you

8:03

know you'd have some extra sag there

8:04

right imagine that extra sag is extra

8:06

production for the US economy well you

8:09

could fill that up without expanding

8:11

without frankly inflating like the flab

8:14

just fills up again but you don't have

8:15

to expand what's already there now that

8:17

may not be the most ungru example but

8:22

from an economist point of view from an

8:25

economic point of view can we say that

8:27

the government creates dead weight loss

8:28

yes can we say that the government would

8:31

just be better off taxing us less

8:33

absolutely now does that mean there

8:35

shouldn't be regulations like should

8:37

lenders be able to give people who can't

8:41

uh uh you know ever expect to afford

8:44

their payments back should that be a

8:47

possibility uh to the tune where they

8:49

have no assets to secure I'm not talking

8:51

about like real estate back debt I'm

8:53

talking about even just like personal

8:55

negam loans that are just based on your

8:57

social and they have you know you get a

8:59

50 $50,000 $100,000 loan yet you make

9:01

$20,000 a year is should things like

9:04

that be allowed an analogy by the way

9:07

there is student loans should students

9:09

making $20,000 a year working at you

9:11

know Jamba or as a server be eligible

9:13

for $50 to $100,000 loans you I think

9:15

not I think that's a scam uh you know if

9:18

you have an asset and you're leveraging

9:20

an asset that's different uh but then

9:22

you should also have some form of

9:24

transparent disclosure like you

9:26

shouldn't have a loan that starts you

9:28

off at a 0% interest rate or a negative

9:30

percent interest rate and then adjusts

9:33

suddenly in the future and then you get

9:34

foreclosed on when you can't repay right

9:36

when the bank wants it that's a scam

9:38

right that's actually something that

9:40

like the Consumer Financial Protection

9:41

Bureau was created to prevent from

9:44

happening so I do have some concerns

9:46

that you could actually create a bubble

9:48

up of of you know Mal investment and Mal

9:53

lending but honestly the free market

9:55

does handle that I mean 2008 was an

9:56

example of the free market solving that

9:58

and correcting that problem the issue is

10:00

it just comes with a lot of a lot of

10:01

pain this is why austrians say n man let

10:04

the free market handle it and this is

10:05

why keynesians are like n man free

10:06

Market's getting eff it up and so this

10:08

is why this debate exists and to some

10:10

extent You could argue that you know the

10:12

Obama Democrats which I think are very

10:14

different from you know some other

10:16

Democrats I think the Obama Democrats

10:18

are level-headed and reasonable in this

10:20

sense I actually don't think they're

10:21

sort of the the extreme Dem uh they're

10:23

more of like no no no the government

10:25

should be there to help and we cut

10:26

around the edges when we make cuts uh

10:29

and then you have uh you know so the

10:31

counter to that which right now appears

10:33

to be the more musky in approach which

10:35

is no man just give the people their

10:37

damn money back and stop wasting the

10:38

damn money you know they're ups and

10:41

downs to everything here but the bottom

10:43

line of this this is truly the direction

10:45

that we're going to go this is a

10:47

fantastic win for the American people

10:49

and frankly it makes me very very

10:51

bullish on the future of the economy

10:54

this this is a GDP contributor in an era

10:57

where it won't necessarily be inflation

10:59

depends how they do it you know if it's

11:02

like here's a I mean look in in 2021 I I

11:06

I had to write a check for like $11

11:08

million in taxes uh that's insane that

11:11

was the check for taxes alone I got

11:14

taxed like 60% you know thanks to well

11:16

California in part but the federal

11:18

government was responsible for 41% of

11:19

the tax and the California government

11:21

was responsible for like 12.6% of the

11:23

tax so you know the federal government

11:24

took most of my money I just chose to

11:27

live in California because my wife and

11:28

my seven children and and and yeah you

11:30

gave them a little bit more but

11:33

um would it be stimulative could more

11:36

people be hired and more businesses

11:37

created if there were lower taxes ABS

11:40

freaking lutely and if this comes back

11:42

in the form of a refund or just frankly

11:43

larger tax cuts in the future big fan

11:45

Count Me In I think this is wonderful no

11:47

no sorry I didn't get dressed up for

11:48

this or whatever honestly I'm a little

11:50

overwhelmed uh in in just like how hard

11:52

it was to study uh and get ready for my

11:55

instrument check ride to become an

11:57

instrument rated pilot uh this is a

11:59

serious profession it takes a lot of

12:01

work and a lot of effort but I am

12:02

excited to be back and uh leave a

12:04

comment down below what kind of video

12:05

would you like do you want to see some

12:07

beginner Finance videos do you want to

12:08

see some real estate videos do you want

12:10

to uh you know uh probably more like

12:13

next month uh you know I'm going to be

12:16

flying again next month do you want me

12:17

to go fly around to some of our house

12:18

hack properties and and do some videos

12:20

on those we could do that as well or

12:22

even just review matterport scans uh

12:24

from the studio we can do that leave me

12:25

a comment down below let me see what you

12:27

want to hear what you want to see and uh

12:29

me see how I can help you out thank you

12:30

so much for watching and supporting

12:31

we'll see youall soon bye

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.