TRANSCRIPTEnglish

AWS Certified Generative AI Developer - Professional: Logging, monitoring, CloudWatch, X-Ray

4m 35s690 words114 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:06

Day 24, logging, monitoring, cloudatch,

0:08

x-ray. This is the day where AWS stops

0:11

caring whether you can build a Genai

0:13

system and starts caring whether you can

0:15

operate one after launch because real

0:16

systems don't fail politely. They fail

0:19

quietly, slowly, and expensively unless

0:21

you can see what's happening.

0:24

Imagine this. A country launches an AI

0:26

assistant for national emergency

0:28

coordination. On day one, everything

0:30

works. On day 10, response time spikes.

0:33

Costs double. One region receives

0:34

incorrect instructions. Leadership asks

0:37

a simple question. What happened when,

0:39

and why? If you don't have logs,

0:41

metrics, and traces, the honest answer

0:43

is silence. That's a failure in

0:46

production and on the exam. Let's start

0:49

with the foundation. Logging answers one

0:51

question. What happened in Genai

0:54

systems? Logging must be structured and

0:56

intentional, not random print

0:58

statements, not chat transcripts,

1:00

structured facts you can query later.

1:02

For every request, you should be able to

1:04

see a request or correlation ID, which

1:07

model was used, which prompt version

1:09

ran, what retrieval parameters were

1:12

applied, which tools were called, how

1:14

long it took, and whether it failed. For

1:16

tools like Lambda, you log the tool

1:19

name, sanitized inputs, output status,

1:22

latency, and retries. This is how

1:24

audits, post incident analysis, and

1:26

debugging actually work. Just as

1:28

important is knowing what not to log.

1:30

You do not log raw PII. You do not log

1:32

secrets. You do not dump full prompts

1:34

containing sensitive data. AWS expects

1:37

privacy aware logging. Logs tell you

1:39

what happened once. Metrics tell you

1:41

whether the system is healthy over time.

1:44

Metrics answer a different question. Is

1:46

something drifting? Is something getting

1:48

worse? The core Genai metrics AWS

1:50

expects you to care about are simple.

1:53

Latency, especially P95 and time to

1:55

first token, errors, model failures,

1:58

tool failures, throttling, cost signals,

2:01

tokens per request, model usage,

2:03

embedding volume, quality signals,

2:05

fallback rate, guardrail blocks,

2:07

retries. You don't read metrics line by

2:10

line. You watch trends. This is where

2:12

Cloudatch becomes your control room.

2:15

Cloudatch gives you logs for detail,

2:17

metrics for health, alarms for early

2:19

warning, and dashboards so ops teams see

2:21

everything in one place. AWS loves

2:24

answers that mention dashboards because

2:26

dashboards mean ownership.

2:28

Now comes the piece most people miss.

2:30

X-ray logs and metrics tell you what is

2:33

wrong. X-ray tells you why. X-ray gives

2:36

you end-to-end traces. A single user

2:38

request might pass through API gateway,

2:41

a lambda orchestrator, bedrock model

2:43

invocation, open search retrieval,

2:46

multiple tool lambdas. X-ray stitches

2:48

all of that into one timeline. You can

2:50

see which step was slow, which

2:52

dependency failed, and where time was

2:54

actually spent. That's impossible with

2:56

logs alone. Let's apply this to real

2:59

failures. If the system is slow, you

3:01

check Cloudatch for P95 latency, then

3:03

open X-ray to see which segment

3:05

dominates. Is it retrieval, the model, a

3:08

tool call? Now you know where to fix. If

3:11

costs explode, you check metrics for

3:13

token usage and model breakdown. Then

3:15

logs for repeated retries, agent loops,

3:17

or cache misses. You don't guess, you

3:20

prove. If answers are wrong, you inspect

3:22

logs for retrieved documents, top K

3:24

values, guardrail blocks, fallback

3:26

rates. Observability turns I think into

3:29

I know. AWS also likes subtle Geni

3:32

specific signals. Guardrail violation

3:34

rate, fallback response rate, agent step

3:37

count, tool calls per request, cache hit

3:40

ratio, embedding recomputation rate.

3:42

Mentioning these signals shows senior

3:44

level ownership. There are classic traps

3:47

here. Logs alone are not monitoring.

3:49

Chat history is not observability.

3:51

Errors alone are not enough. Tracing is

3:54

not optional for agents. The correct

3:56

mental model is all three together.

3:59

This triangle solves the exam. Logs tell

4:02

you what happened. Metrics tell you if

4:04

it's healthy. Traces tell you why it

4:06

happened. Miss one side and you're

4:08

guessing. Here's the one sentence to

4:10

lock this day into memory. If you can't

4:12

observe it, you don't own it. That is

4:15

AWS culture in a single line. Final self

4:18

test. A multi-step agent is slow and

4:21

sometimes fails. You need to find

4:22

exactly which step caused the problem.

4:24

What do you use? AWS X-ray combined with

4:28

structured logs and Cloudatch metrics.

4:30

That's day 24 mastered.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.