TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Shocking Recession ADMISSION from Trump Admin!

23m 15s4,249 words608 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

the Trump Administration is willing to

0:01

accept a recession to accomplish what

0:03

they want in this video we've not only

0:05

got to talk about what ladnik just said

0:07

but also Canada's retaliation or new

0:10

retaliation and what this could mean

0:12

going forward for the stock market

0:14

recession CPA this morning everything

0:16

together we're going to talk about it

0:17

let's get started with this will these

0:20

policies be worth it if they lead to a

0:23

recession even a short-term recession

0:26

these policies are the most important

0:28

thing America am has ever had so it is

0:31

worth it it it is worth it a I don't

0:34

think they the only reason there could

0:35

possibly be a recession is because of

0:37

the Biden nonsense that we had to live

0:40

with these policies produce revenues

0:43

they produce growth they produce

0:45

factories being built here you're seeing

0:47

the announcements I went to all right so

0:49

let's break this down first of all I

0:52

have to give lutnick an A+ for being a

0:54

Salesman for Trump but I'll tell you if

0:57

we go into a recession

1:00

these announcements of factories being

1:03

built and Investments coming into the

1:05

United States from Apple or other

1:07

companies they're just that

1:09

announcements Capital expenditures get

1:12

cut in a recession so Mr lutnick

1:15

respectfully if we fall into a recession

1:18

because consumer spending knows Dives

1:20

and I'm not saying we definitely will

1:21

but if we do those Investments are going

1:24

to get put on pause and ironically it

1:26

might end up being the next

1:28

administration at is 4 years years from

1:30

now that ends up picking up the benefits

1:31

of those it's sort of like the irony

1:33

that when Donald Trump lost in 2020 a

1:38

lot of us joked on this channel we said

1:40

wow wouldn't it be crazy if for some

1:43

reason inflation didn't end up being

1:45

transitory we ended up having a lot of

1:47

inflation and Biden got blamed for it

1:50

all and then all of a sudden Trump came

1:51

back in right around the time that

1:53

inflation was starting to settle back

1:54

down again gee wouldn't that be

1:57

crazy well as Elon Musk likes to say

2:00

usually the most ironic outcome is what

2:02

happens and that's exactly what happened

2:04

which is just like wow okay that's my BL

2:07

isn't it then also possible that there's

2:08

this weird irony that yes Donald Trump

2:11

could set up tax cuts and a lot of

2:14

investment into America but those

2:16

Investments don't actually come to

2:18

fruition until after Trump leaves office

2:21

and potentially after a recession given

2:23

the willingness of the Trump

2:24

Administration to endure a recession now

2:28

I don't know that we are primed

2:30

for a recession immediately I think data

2:34

is clearly signaling slowing and a lot

2:36

of people are suffering and feeling like

2:37

we're already in a recession data

2:39

doesn't say we're in it yet but that's

2:41

okay the data usually takes a while to

2:43

say that we're in it the real issue is

2:45

the pH balance of the United States

2:48

economy is starting to turn ugly Goldman

2:50

Sachs says macroeconomic signals are

2:52

clearly slowing we're seeing those price

2:55

reductions on future targets for the S&P

2:57

500 and we're seeing those PRI those

3:00

increases in odds from JP Morgan and

3:02

others over recession risk BCA research

3:04

suggesting a 70% chance JP Morgan

3:07

revising up to about a 30% Goldman up to

3:09

about a 40% chance these are all risk

3:11

factors that our economy will have to

3:13

manage in addition to the turbulence

3:15

that we've get from Canada now remember

3:17

yesterday Canada imposed a 25%

3:20

electricity uh tariff on exports of

3:22

electricity from Canada from the Ontario

3:25

provid uh Province yesterday I estimated

3:28

that this was worth about 1 to $4 per

3:30

$100 of electricity that people in New

3:32

York Minnesota and Michigan pay in other

3:34

words it's a very very small tariff that

3:38

25% of a small number works out to $1

3:41

to4 per $100 tiny tiny tariff so Canada

3:46

yesterday withdrew those tariffs and if

3:49

you were looking at x.com at all you saw

3:52

a lot of people on X cheering how Donald

3:55

Trump just crushed the Canadians and

3:57

beat the Canadians the tariffs uh you

3:59

know folded right over in Canada As

4:02

Trump came in and said we're doubling

4:04

your steel and aluminum

4:07

teffs I looked at this with suspicion as

4:09

I usually do I look at everything with

4:11

suspicion I try to give you unique

4:13

perspectives I was looking at this

4:14

yesterday go those electricity tariffs

4:17

weren't worth it keep that in mind those

4:19

electricity tariffs were so small they

4:21

had such a tiny impact on Americans

4:24

whereas the doubling of 25% to 50% the

4:28

aluminum and steel TS were worth tariffs

4:31

on essentially 10 billion of

4:32

infrastructure in Industry that's bad

4:35

those are a hit so Trump's response was

4:38

significantly larger in response to

4:40

those electricity tariffs so Canada says

4:43

all right let's get rid of those tariffs

4:45

cool Trump's big tariff goes away now

4:48

what does Canada do they come out with

4:50

some real tariffs this morning Canada

4:53

just announced a 25% matching tariff

4:55

against items like steel aluminum cast

4:57

iron products computers and other

4:59

products against the United States now

5:01

we're actually hitting over $20 billion

5:04

of Industry not a little bit of an

5:07

electricity surcharge we're actually

5:09

hitting a real portion of us

5:12

industry and Canada is announcing that

5:15

they are planning to raise tariffs in

5:18

coordination with European allies this

5:21

is what I warned about a few days ago

5:23

when I said the biggest concern that we

5:26

have is not what Sarah Eisen says on

5:30

which is oh you know Mexico versus the

5:32

United States they don't have the cards

5:34

Oh Canada versus the United States oh

5:36

they don't have the cards the biggest

5:38

risk is actually a coalition of all of

5:42

the people that we are upsetting in

5:44

America with these uncertain tariffs and

5:46

these make everything equal again

5:48

tariffs that's at least the

5:50

argument which I like to it's it's a bad

5:53

name please leave a comment with a

5:54

better name but I call it NAFTA you know

5:56

like not the United States again it's a

5:58

terrible name but a CO Coalition of

6:01

China Mexico Canada and Europe all of

6:04

those economies together are very

6:08

powerful against the United States it's

6:09

very easy to say oneon-one we win all of

6:13

them together becomes a problem now keep

6:16

this in mind as well lck's thesis is

6:20

clearly one of populism and one that

6:23

makes logical sense if you believe that

6:26

economically it could be achieved let me

6:29

rephrase this in a simple way by showing

6:32

you the clip of the passion that he

6:34

gives you 9 minutes into the video uh

6:37

with with um Face the Nation I just need

6:40

you to know going into what you're about

6:43

to hear

6:45

economically and

6:47

historically okay so I'm not trying to

6:50

you know say that the Trump

6:51

administration's poopy doopy or this

6:53

that or whatever I'm just trying to give

6:55

you facts okay I purposefully I try to

6:57

stay in the middle politically because I

6:59

just I just want to arm you with

7:00

knowledge I want you to look at the

7:02

1930s the only thing we ended up

7:05

achieving was massive anti-americanism

7:08

other countries leaving the gold

7:09

standard after the tariffs that we

7:11

applied not only in the early 1920s the

7:13

mid 1920s the late 1920s the early 1930s

7:16

oh my gosh we're in a Great Depression

7:17

now uh what is the first thing that FDR

7:19

tries to do let's remove all the tariffs

7:21

and go back to free trade because we've

7:23

exported so much anti-americanism and

7:26

and you know growth has collapsed this

7:28

is bad mind you also that when Argentina

7:32

first of all they didn't start a trade

7:33

war with everyone but when Javier

7:35

Malay you know chainsa spending uh in

7:39

government the first thing that happened

7:41

is a recession they immediately

7:43

plummeted into negative GDP the next

7:45

year you know after Javier's election

7:47

now this was necessary Javier mle you

7:50

know they didn't have a country anymore

7:52

right know people say that in the United

7:54

States as well but we were nowhere close

7:55

to the hyperinflation that Argentina was

7:58

facing you know you're talking

8:00

3,000% inflation or whatever okay maybe

8:03

not that high in Argentina but it was

8:05

substantial we we had substantial

8:06

currency devaluation and inflation for

8:08

Argentina

8:10

so what we look at is

8:13

historically tariffs are an economic bad

8:17

they don't level any playing field they

8:19

make things worse okay we we know that

8:22

and markets know that that's what

8:23

history teaches us lutnick does make a

8:27

good argument though that Americans are

8:29

suffering and this is true both of these

8:31

things could be true it could be true

8:32

that Americans are suffering and that

8:35

tariffs are bad except ladnik assumes

8:38

that tariffs will make the American

8:40

suffering less bad but the reality and

8:43

this is the irony I want to talk of is

8:45

that if you take the lessons of History

8:47

tariffs will actually make the suffering

8:50

worse before things get better and this

8:52

is why I think there's this irony that

8:54

it is possible these tariffs drive us

8:56

into a recession you actually have

8:59

people in a worse situation rather than

9:01

just autom manufacturers not having jobs

9:04

now all of a sudden 20 million Americans

9:06

don't have jobs and other people see

9:08

their business sales decline because

9:09

there's a recession now all of a sudden

9:11

everybody's suffering versus just one

9:13

industry of individuals who are out

9:15

competed unfortunately by lower wages in

9:17

places like in Mexico and Canada that's

9:20

globalism now of course this is where

9:22

the Trump Administration people like let

9:23

Lake are like oh the globalists are bad

9:26

that's fine you could argue against

9:28

everyone else but a capitalistic economy

9:30

looks for the cheapest way to produce

9:33

because what happens and letnik doesn't

9:35

mention this but what happens when

9:36

you're able to produce a Chevy truck in

9:39

Canada cheaper than you are in America a

9:41

what happens you get to buy a cheaper

9:44

Chevy truck all Americans have access to

9:47

lower priced Vehicles yes some Americans

9:50

lost their jobs to Canadians but all

9:53

Americans get cheaper vehicle access so

9:57

this is why economically tariffs are

9:58

generally seen as bad and and free

10:01

markets are generally seen as good

10:02

because they lower costs for everyone

10:04

free markets are truly

10:06

deflationary uh the only reason we

10:08

actually experience inflation in an

10:09

economy is because we print so much

10:11

money and we'll continue to print money

10:14

because it encourages more spending and

10:15

lending all right and it's politically

10:17

popular too let's listen to the passion

10:19

here though you can't argue his passion

10:21

his passion is right on

10:24

economically like this is why I say I

10:26

said at the beginning of video he's a

10:27

great salesman an economic

10:30

dunce didn't want to cry why why is it 7

10:34

years lower it's not the air we breathe

10:37

it's not the food it's oh seven years

10:39

lower is just a reference to why is uh

10:41

uh the life expectancy of somebody with

10:43

a high school degree seven years lower

10:45

than somebody who doesn't somebody who's

10:46

like college educated he he does give a

10:48

passion impassionate answer here and I

10:51

actually agree that our school system

10:52

sucks you know that I ran for governor

10:54

on fixing our schools it's not the

10:56

medicine it's despair if I'm moving your

10:59

factory where your grandfather worked

11:01

and your father worked and you planed to

11:03

work and I moved that factory to

11:05

Canada your life is ruined

11:09

drugs alcohol and suicide and then

11:13

fentel comes in and finishes the job I

11:16

hear what you're saying great

11:18

salesman and so him saying this first of

11:22

all I know there are people going right

11:24

on man I'm pissed my jobs my family's

11:26

jobs went to Canon rightfully so you you

11:29

deserve to be pissed but is the solution

11:33

careening us into a recession to apply

11:36

what history has already told us is

11:38

quite frankly stupid economically dumb

11:42

and this isn't to argue that oh we

11:43

shouldn't have fair trade we should have

11:47

free trade on all

11:49

angles wielding tariffs as a way for

11:52

free to achieve free trade historically

11:55

just doesn't work but again we're just

11:56

referring to the fact of history and

11:59

trying to apply who knows maybe maybe

12:00

this time will be different Donald Trump

12:03

is going to end it he's going to rebuild

12:06

those communities he's going to rebuild

12:08

it and you know the statistic you're

12:09

going to see that's going to make the

12:10

most difference the average life

12:12

expectancy of our Workforce is going to

12:14

be equal and that is going to be because

12:17

they're going to have a better life

12:18

under Donald Trump how are you going to

12:20

convince manufacturers to bring

12:22

factories back to the US if you don't

12:24

show them consistency that you have a

12:28

tariff plan and it's not going to change

12:30

tomorrow or the next day but it's a

12:33

wellth thought out plan and it's going

12:35

to remain in place Donald Trump said

12:37

from the beginning reciprocal tariffs

12:40

how you treat us is how we will treat

12:42

you what people don't understand but

12:44

then he said it's all open for

12:45

negotiation and if somebody brings him a

12:47

deal you might pull it off no no

12:49

reciprocal tariffs are the Baseline and

12:53

the countries of the world like Europe

12:55

has a 20% vat yeah countries like Europe

13:00

oh

13:01

lutnick okay okay we get it yes other

13:04

countries have tariffs on us and some of

13:07

Trump's work some of it will lead to

13:10

lower tariffs in other areas over time

13:13

as we get closer to free trade maybe we

13:15

just have to break a bunch of stuff and

13:17

then sit down like mature adults and get

13:19

free trade everywhere maybe this is a

13:20

means to an end and I think this is why

13:22

letnik says hey if we have to go through

13:24

a recession it's worth it the irony that

13:26

I see is a high possibility if this sort

13:29

of of ridiculousness kind of keeps going

13:30

on uh in markets is we actually end up

13:34

inducing a recession that causes so much

13:36

damage to Americans over the the longer

13:39

term I don't think this is like

13:40

everybody in 05 is like oh it's going to

13:42

be a quick recession in hindsight it

13:44

actually was you know eight 18 months s

13:46

it's just not that bad of a recession of

13:48

financial crisis in terms of length Doom

13:50

bubble was worth at worse at three years

13:52

and then of course you've got you know

13:53

lost decades like what you saw in Japan

13:55

or the Great Depression where you've got

13:57

a Whole Decade of loss or if you bought

14:00

stocks at the peak of the bubble and the

14:01

AI bubble or sorry AI bubble Freudian

14:04

slip of the dotcom bubble uh you know it

14:07

took you 10 years to make your money

14:08

back that was just to make your money

14:10

back not to make a return on your money

14:12

but anyway the irony here is that

14:15

there's so much damage that's caused

14:17

that people actually end up electing a

14:18

bunch of Democrats because they recoil

14:21

against the the policies that have

14:23

occurred here you get a democratic sweep

14:25

in four years and then all of a sudden

14:28

the lower tax benefits and the corporate

14:30

Investments coming out of a recession

14:32

end up supporting growth again in the

14:35

American Stock Market and for jobs and

14:37

people and then you know that again

14:39

could be an ironic outcome just because

14:41

of the turbulence that's created from

14:43

from things like these tariffs now JB

14:45

Morgan had an interesting argument this

14:46

morning and I talked about it with my

14:48

course members and as we wrote Our Alpha

14:50

report out uh we talked about how

14:52

there's a likely move to fade any

14:55

rallies and we want to be careful of

14:57

this so JP Morgan's like like hey it's

14:59

too much uncertainty any bump you get in

15:02

the stock market fade it sell it it's

15:04

interesting we were sitting in our

15:05

course member live stream this morning

15:06

and as the bell hit I said watch Tesla

15:09

go to 250 do not buy it at 250 hash #

15:14

not personalized Financial advice but

15:16

don't buy a put right before wait for a

15:18

little bit of a breakout and then you'll

15:20

see a fall that's usually how this trade

15:23

plays out and this is all before it

15:25

actually happened right and then what

15:27

played out oh how interesting we broke

15:30

out you don't want to buy it before cuz

15:31

then you get stopped out you buy it when

15:33

you lose and sure enough you lost this

15:35

whole range here you went to retest and

15:37

you could have played the game

15:39

again so lines are at Play Again these

15:41

are the things we like to talk about in

15:42

the course member live streams in our

15:44

Alpha report we kind of go through our

15:45

historic volatilities and trade ideas

15:47

for the day but anyway well another

15:49

thing that we analyzed is we said look

15:51

the NASDAQ is up you know 1.8% at open

15:55

and I look it's it's extremely rare for

15:57

the NASDAQ to close up more than 2 and

15:59

1/2% and so I argued there was more

16:01

downside ahead at open than there was

16:04

upside because there's just a ceiling

16:05

that we're going to hit on on Naas

16:07

growth it usually just grows slower uh

16:09

and sure enough uh that so far that's

16:11

what happen that's happened but these

16:12

are again join us in the course member

16:14

live streams by the way many of you were

16:16

asking for and we're probably going to

16:18

release it within the next day or two uh

16:20

sort of like a one month trial option

16:23

where you pay a very small amount just

16:26

to see like is it right for you uh or or

16:29

maybe a monthly option we're still

16:30

working The Kinks out on exactly what we

16:32

want to offer there I'm taking your

16:33

feedback so leave me a comment with what

16:35

you I'm I'm trying to make sure we can

16:36

provide Great Value while also um having

16:39

it be accessible so consider that leave

16:42

me a comment so uh you know what else

16:45

well Merill is actually very bullish

16:48

which is interesting see Merill formerly

16:50

meril Lynch now at Bank of America

16:52

Merill suggests that the Tailwinds of

16:54

our economy still support large

16:56

companies they site global economic it

16:59

is picking up uh they say that

17:01

manufacturing is moving back into

17:02

recession though they don't acknowledge

17:04

that manufa sorry manufacturing is

17:06

moving back into expansion though they

17:07

don't acknowledge that the reason

17:09

manufacturing might be moving back into

17:11

expansion is because of the pull forward

17:13

of tariffs no mention of that at all

17:16

which kind of makes me scratch my head a

17:18

little bit how could you miss that but

17:19

anyway they argue that consumer service

17:21

spending corporate investment and

17:23

Manufacturing are supportive of of

17:24

expansion that Europe is benefiting from

17:26

Chinese growth and that the broadening

17:28

of the market is still and well they see

17:30

a healthy consumer which I also question

17:32

uh and they recommend incorporate growth

17:34

and value stocks balance and they're

17:35

slightly overweight equities personally

17:37

when when they have those sort of

17:39

critical Mistakes by not at least

17:41

mentioning the Tariff pull forward and I

17:43

don't know where they're getting this

17:44

idea that the consumer is presently

17:46

still healthy especially in the face of

17:47

the write Downs that we're seeing from

17:49

Airlines Kohl's Best Buy Target Wallmart

17:53

like these are all consumption warnings

17:56

and they're ignoring those so it does

17:58

sort of make me SC scratch my head and I

17:59

don't know if I can trust y'all but okay

18:01

whatever uh Goldman Sachs is worried

18:03

about credit spreads potentially

18:05

widening uh they they suggest that that

18:08

could lead to a potential shock in the

18:09

economy and this is true that is

18:12

actually what we're most at risk of is

18:14

is not like you know a day-to-day Trend

18:17

in a certain direction we're at most

18:19

risk in my opinion of some sort of

18:21

substantial shock uh a Japanese carry

18:26

trade uh some other Black Swan and then

18:29

that actually forces layoffs which then

18:31

pushes us into a recession that's the

18:34

greatest risk in my opinion I I can't

18:35

say that just tariff volatility is going

18:38

to do that and I actually don't think

18:40

that markets as I said on on Monday when

18:42

we had a lot of tariff volatility I

18:44

don't actually think that

18:46

tariffs uh or or the market is pricing

18:48

in recession at the moment I think that

18:53

uh if we were pricing in recession bond

18:55

yields would be way lower than 4.3% on

18:58

the 10 year we're not the market is not

19:01

pricing in a recession right now uh and

19:04

the spread between the two and the 10 is

19:06

like 32 basis points that is not

19:08

recessionary Spread recessionary spread

19:11

would be you know 100 100 plus basis

19:14

point spread certainly at least 50 uh

19:16

but more likely a shock to over that 50

19:19

to 90 range that I always talk about and

19:21

you'd have some large spike in credit

19:23

spreads not only the the 210 spread but

19:26

also risk spreads corporates topic for a

19:29

different video uh so we're not seeing

19:31

that yet which does mean if we need to

19:34

price in recession risk there's probably

19:36

more downside because it's not priced in

19:39

but then again maybe we won't have a

19:40

recession you know treasur Steve

19:42

treasury secretary Steve minian was on

19:43

this morning goes people are

19:44

overreacting there's no chance of

19:46

recession all right uh this is an

19:48

interesting article Tesla investor

19:49

survey shows 85% believe Elon Musk

19:52

politics are having a negative or

19:53

extremely impact negative impact on the

19:54

company ah small small sample size on

19:57

CBC yeah whatever

19:59

you know I was actually debating with

20:00

Zero Hedge this morning a little bit on

20:02

on X I encourage you to follow me there

20:05

uh just because when I see news updates

20:06

I sometimes I'll throw things on there

20:09

uh and you know like that comes out

20:11

sometimes a little bit before I can make

20:12

a video on

20:13

it but um what's interesting is uh well

20:18

two things Jim Kramer no longer allows

20:20

replies on X which I thought was kind of

20:22

interesting but if I go to replies I

20:24

replied to a Zero Hedge story here where

20:28

they said Tesla q1 earnings should be

20:30

quite should be strong quite strong and

20:32

what they did is they put up this image

20:34

here by Tesla by rivian by elcid by a

20:36

Mercedes by a Porsche and they show this

20:38

explosion of by Tesla on the right and

20:42

uh I replied and said sarcastically

20:44

obviously if only there was a reason why

20:46

by Tesla could be soaring in Google or

20:49

news results and so I wrote Trump buys

20:53

Tesla and you get the explosion so

20:56

obviously there's a heavy weight of of

20:59

uh of these search results being skewed

21:01

to everybody going what Trump bought a

21:02

Tesla yeah so that's that's uh a little

21:05

skewing there now Zero Hedge replies if

21:08

only there was a reason companies spend

21:10

on marketing and to that honestly like

21:12

touche uh you know I guess these things

21:16

uh spending to to buy uh advertising

21:19

from the White House is a form of

21:21

marketing and In fairness that is what I

21:23

asked Elon Musk to do why not advertise

21:26

these things that you told us here I

21:27

feel like nobody else knows about this

21:29

we'll we'll try a little advertising and

21:30

see how it goes why not

21:33

adver so I mean

21:36

touche Kevin they're just doing what you

21:39

asked them to do they're

21:42

advertising I'm like oh damn that's

21:45

right uh no it's it's like hey you know

21:48

there's an old saying no press is bad

21:50

press right so this there's no doubt uh

21:54

you're getting a lot of press at Tesla

21:56

right now in fact I'm pretty sure the uh

21:58

the cyber truck is it the Cyber truck uh

22:02

uh X account just uh just tweeted uh

22:06

living in everyone's

22:08

uh head

22:10

rentree it's honestly kind of a good one

22:13

uh take a look at this uh where is it oh

22:17

there it is living in everyone's head

22:18

rentree it's true uh very very true and

22:22

then of course you got AOC over here

22:24

everyone needs to call their Democratic

22:26

senator right now they're starting to

22:27

Cave tell them vote no on clure vote no

22:30

on the Republican spending bill today is

22:32

The

22:32

Showdown uh AOC wants the government to

22:35

shut

22:37

down all right AOC so uh yeah wow well

22:42

quite interesting day eh well we'll see

22:44

how it all goes thank you so very much

22:46

for being here oh Pokemon Go Games unit

22:49

sold to Saudis for $3.5 billion damn

22:53

anyway all right folks see you all in

22:54

the next one appreciate you all being

22:56

here good luck out there goodbye why not

22:57

advertising these things that you told

22:59

us here I feel like nobody else knows

23:01

about this we'll we'll try a little

23:02

advertising and see how it goes

23:03

congratulations man you have done so

23:05

much people love you people look up to

23:07

you Kevin paffrath there financial

23:08

analyst and YouTuber meet Kevin always

23:10

great to get your take

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.