The Fed's *RULE* Just FLIPPED | Unexpected SHIFT.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
well the FED is back at it again talking
down the stock market all stock indices
ran across the board today and bond
yields actually going up indicating
selling in the bond market suggesting
that some are going uh oh maybe the FED
is going to go a lot further than we
think now let's break down the comments
that happened this morning and try to
put them into context so first contacts
the last summary of economic projections
from the FED suggested the FED would
raise rates to a peak of 4.6 percent
since then we've got a pretty bad
inflation report uh in in October that
was followed by a pretty good inflation
report here in November but that bad one
in October based on CPI numbers from
September led the fomc projected
terminal rate to move up right now we
sit just below five percent that's kind
of where we think the fed's gonna go so
we got a peek out at five percent stay
there for a while well today we got Mr
Bullard who really really threw a
curveball to markets and I want to talk
about whether we actually want to heed
that warning or if they're trying to
accomplish something else Mr Bullard
this morning suggested the following we
need to get to a sufficiently
restrictive zone of interest rates and
significantly restrictive is something
that's Up For Debate but he gave a range
using the Taylor rule as a guide and I
going to break down the Taylor rule in
just a moment so if you're confused by
the TR the Taylor rule don't worry about
it what you want to pay attention to is
here it suggests the recommended federal
reserve's policy rate that's the fomc
terminal rate right which which is
currently still got about a percent to
go before we get to sort of the peak
levels we'll see but based on the
recommendations created by the Taylor
rule we have a generous tale tailor rule
calculation because you could change
some coefficients in the formula I'll
show you how that works and then we have
a less generous one in English this
scenario says inflation will be lower
this scenario says inflation will be
higher
and as a result you get this chart it
shows that presently we are here on this
little blue line and the generous
version version here suggests that the
fed's policy rate needs to go to five
percent well that's what markets are
currently anticipating is that we need
to go to about five percent but look at
the less generous version it goes all
the way up to seven percent and the fact
that what the market is pricing in right
now is literally the bottom edge of this
entire range scared the hell out of
markets today this was bad
now let's understand the Taylor Rule and
then put into context what the FED is
trying to accomplish so the Taylor rule
was created by this guy John Taylor from
uh Stanford and there are many different
formulas for it I'm going to use a
simplified version just because every
single one of these pieces here can have
coefficients that get changed based on
certain inputs so you could really
manipulate this formula pretty pretty
intensely but what I'm going to do is I
want to show you the bias that this
formula has and then I'll tell you a
little bit about the Stanford guy and
kind of where his head has been
so the way this works is you have this
formula here I'm not going to even
bother reading it to you because half
are you going to click off the only
formula you need to know right now is
whatever the price is of the courses on
building your wealth link down below you
could take 60 off using the Black Friday
coupon code if you join Elite Hustlers
you get access to both exclusive live
stream sets the exclusive uh Elite
Hustlers live stream set the new
lectures that come out every day the
market is open and the regular course
member live streams which after Black
Friday will be exclusive for uh for just
course members of real estate and stocks
and psychology money in those courses
anyway so not without reading you that
formula here's how it works the Taylor
rule tells you that whatever rate the
Federal Reserve chooses should be
determined by the rate of inflation this
makes sense the FED uses pce not CPI
that's why it's lower and I already
filled it in
and then you should add to what the
inflation rate is
basically how much real GDP has deviated
from where it currently is so in other
words if you want GDP to be at one
percent or let me say you want it to be
at two percent and you're at one percent
you've got about a 50 deviation there
that would add another quarter of a
basis point here is what you would add
just a rough example and you can
manipulate these coefficients as well
that's why this formula gets really
complicated but I'm going to keep it
simple and then over here you take
another half times the inflation rate
minus two and then you add two okay very
very simply put the bias of this rule
even if you missed all of that the bias
of this rule is the fomc rate should be
higher let me prove that to you watch
this we're going to do something really
simple here we're going to take a blue
pencil here we're going to say the
deviation of GDP is zero we're right
where we want to be okay great well that
cancels out the middle part of the
formula right let's say that inflation
is zero okay well that cancels out the
left part of the formula if inflation is
zero then this right here is going to be
one and that's because you take the
inflation rate plus two which if
inflation is zero would just be the plus
two multiplied by 0.5 that'd be one plus
another 2 over here that would be a
total of three
so if GDP is right where we want it and
inflation is zero the Taylor rule says
the the the fomc rate should be three
percent now why is that important well
it's important because if inflation is
zero and GDP is On Target
why would we need a three percent fed
funds rate this rule was created back in
1993 and it was created by somebody who
was very upset starting in 2005 for
about the next actually probably
starting in 2003 for about the next 12
years all the way through 2015 he was
regularly complaining that the federal
reserve's rates were too low in my
opinion this individual and his formula
have a bias for a substantially higher
fomc rate than we're actually likely to
see in the future now this really gets
down to your personal belief your
personal belief you have to ask yourself
do you think that if we removed the the
pandemic and all of the money printing
that happened in the economy do you
believe it would make sense for the
federal funds rate to be back to two
percent maybe two and a half percent
where it was in 2019 we were actually
hiking from about one and a half to two
and a half percent remember Donald Trump
was threatening to fire Jerome Powell
right do you believe we should be back
at those levels or do you think we
should follow the Taylor Rule and if
inflation was in theory zero and GDP was
fine which we did have a little bit of
inflation then which would just mean to
be even higher should the fomc rate be
three or four percent
see I think Mr Taylor and his rule are
kind of stuck in the 90s and the early
2000s personally I think that we have
moved into a regime where we we've come
to expect lower interest rates over the
long term and if you believe we're going
to return to lower interest rates over
the long term and if you kind of scale
out over the past 500 years of interest
rates which is quite interesting if you
do that there are plenty of charts of
this online but let me just basically
give you the bottom line of what you
would see if you look at interest rates
throughout history they've basically
just done this oh what drives interest
rates down throughout history well
generally low inflation so if you
believe we're going to return to low
inflation you would expect rates to be
lower probably than what John John
Taylor calls for and low inflation is
generally caused by an aging population
that spends less remember the velocity
of money one person spends a dollar it
creates four dollars in the economy but
when you get older you start spending
less not more because you make class you
have left less left over people keep
thinking oh when I retire I'm going to
be able to spend money like crazy wrong
you generally live off the whatever
you've you've been able to Nest Egg
essentially and then you get really
worried about like not having enough and
then having to go back to work right so
you tend to spend less so aging drives a
lower inflation globalism provides lower
inflation because people who are working
for three dollars an hour in in you know
Caribbean islands or in South America uh
start doing work that's worth twenty
dollars an hour in America through you
know Zoom or technology or the cloud
Photoshop programming whatever right and
all of a sudden it's like okay well pay
the person who's making three dollars
ten dollars and you're still saving ten
dollars as a company on hiring an
American right globalist and I'm not
saying that's what you should do I'm
just saying that's what drives other
people's wages up but actually drives
Global wages down and that's
disinflationary especially for modern
economies uh so globalism productivity
and innovation of course when it becomes
cheaper to have more iPhones or more
iPads or whatever what ends up happening
well you become more productive because
you have tools that make you more
productive we've got plenty tools that
make us productive and they allow us to
for example be on a cruise ship and
actually still upload videos to YouTube
to share education that's what I'm all
about is sharing education of course you
could always learn more about my
education if you like my perspective in
the courses on building your wealth link
down below getting before Black Friday
it's going to be the best pricing uh we
we always have pricing that Trends up
and so you get in now you can have the
best pricing but this is this is one of
the largest coupons we've ever done
so what does this mean well it
potentially means in my opinion that
John Taylor is a little too aggressive
here why then would James Bullard of the
FED talk about Mr Taylor and the Taylor
rule well for a couple reasons one the
Taylor rule has the biggest concern over
what's known as the wage price spiral
and that's the risk that ultimately
people keep demanding more pay because
prices are going up
fortunately the risk of that is becoming
less severe it was starting to get quite
concerning at the beginning of 2022
which was the biggest reason I sold
stocks that risk has mostly moderated
but it's still a present risk
so what happens when or why then if the
risk of a wage price spiral is is
limited uh although it is still present
why then is James Ballard
Hawking why is he talking like the FED
might actually raise rates to seven
percent to kill inflation well the
reason in my opinion he's doing this is
because the FED has a very important job
and it is driving this chart down sorry
not Tesla chart it's doing that too it's
doing that to a lot of growth and
cyclical stocks this particular chart is
a chart of the five-year Break Even rate
of inflation if you've been watching
this channel you've seen me watch this
pretty closely it was doing great all
the way up to about October and that's
where the FED lost it where all of a
sudden this darn chart starts exploding
and it really took the last fomc meeting
for Jerome Powell remember when that
reporter asked the stupid questions like
hey the market seems to be going up it
was going down and then Jerome Powell
just lets it rip and talks about all the
reasons why the fat has to work harder
and raise rates more the FED wants
Finance conditions to be tight that's
what we learn almost every day from
Nikki leaks they want tight Financial
conditions they want layoffs they would
never politically say that but let's be
real that's what they want they want
layoffs they want lower risk of a wage
price spiral when you lay a lot of
people off what signal does that send to
employees it sends a signal that oh crap
I better not quit or get fired because I
might have a hard time finding a job
somewhere else where and that's very
different from the mentality of oh fire
me I don't need to be productive here
I'll go get another job that'll pay me
more you know that's kind of like what
you had in 2021 was this this belief
that you can't get hurt uh and boy I've
have those things changed but take a
look at this because of the Federal
Reserves yapping and that weaker
inflation report that we just got in
November we've actually thankfully seen
a really nice relaxation of this curve
this is very important but this is what
the FED is doing you can see that
inflection point right here would
actually steeping down the FED will do
whatever they need to do you to come out
and publicly talk inflation down and
they want this break even curve to be
even lower than this point where it was
over in September because if you go five
years back that point was just as high
as what it was in 2019 when they were
hiking so you have a Fed who has a job
and their job is to basically until we
get multiple reports on a roast showing
that inflation is is going down they are
just going to come out day after day
after day after day and they're going to
talk the market tight that's what they
want they're always going to look for
the bad news oh that's just one good
report and then as soon as two good
reports come out like CPI and PBI well
you know two reports isn't the start of
a trend and I guarantee you when Bullard
came out this morning okay I can't
guarantee this but I can only guarantee
a 60 off coupon code well I guarantee
again I hashtag don't guarantee but I
almost guarantee you that after Bola
talked markets read this morning Jerome
Powell on them were like
heck yeah bro you did it you crash Mark
it's a good thing we sold out right
before we started tightening huh all
under the guise of uh yeah let's uh just
get out of the market so we're not
biased yeah not not shady at all uh
anyway there you have it so
what's going on with the fed's great
reset trajectory well ultimately it
comes down to what actually happens with
the data but in terms of your investing
and positioning you have to ask yourself
what's more likely are we going to go
back to a low inflationary regime modern
monetary Theory zero or negative
interest rates I would say that's
probably 80 to 90 likely we can disagree
about that of course the whole point of
sharing perspective is not that you
become a zealot and listen and agree
with everything I say right uh and and I
think there's maybe a 20 chance that we
end up going into a direction of
consistently higher levels of federal
funds rates that maybe four or five
percent just becomes the new normal and
we just sit here for years that's going
to be devastating for Real Estate like
really devastating for Real Estate it's
one thing if we go back to zerp the zero
interest rates real estate will be fine
it'll rebound so quickly but if you're
looking for more affordable real estate
unfortunately there's no right answer
for you because as fomc rates stay high
mortgage rates Stay High
so it doesn't again even though prices
might come down it doesn't really
increase your affordability which is
pretty terrible uh you would need a
substantially massive correction uh
anyway so that gives you some insight if
you found this helpful consider sharing
the video thank you for watching
subscribe and we'll see in the next one
good luck everybody bye
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.