Media FRANTICALLY Censors Trump Speech | HUGE MISTAKES | Trump Arrest
FULL TRANSCRIPT
oh you won't believe what NBC just
pulled on Donald Trump's opposed arrest
speech the world was waiting to see what
Donald Trump was going to say after his
34 felony count arraignment and as with
the rest of the world I decided to tune
in to YouTube because after all I make
YouTube videos to listen to what Trump
was saying so while it was playing right
before having dinner with my family I'm
listening to it and then all of a sudden
NBC decides you know what we're just not
gonna play it anymore listen to what NBC
has to say then I'm going to give you my
thoughts and my reaction on what Donald
Trump had to say but this was
mind-blowing Democratic left-leaning
just cut away from Donald Trump's speech
post arraignment here we go I'll go from
our beautiful white house just as
virtually every other president has done
in the past
okay we've been listening into the
former president as he makes remarks at
Mar-A-Lago we initially took this event
thinking he was going to talk about the
indictment today being charged with 34
felony counts in Manhattan it has turned
into a speech of a list of Grievances
and of course some falsehoods uh the
notes I have made so far talking about
an unconstitutional search at Mar-A-Lago
for those documents which was not true
and a lot of election uh mistruths about
what happened to him in the 2020
election this is it feels like a speech
that he would deliver to campaign rally
largely because that is the vibe of what
we're seeing here at Mar-A-Lago the
Grievances that he aired that we have
heard before again and again rehashing
some of these election conspiracy theory
lies and then moving on to these attacks
against Alvin Bragg and talking about
how he says everybody who looked at this
case says there's no crime and it should
never have been brought that is clearly
not the case the Manhattan district
attorney Alvin Bragg thinks there is a
case here that is why he has brought
this he is referencing it sounds like
some of his allies on Capitol Hill and
elsewhere in the party who are backing
him up to say that this is in their
their view political persecution of a
current presidential candidate it's an
opportunity really here for Donald Trump
to make his case as to as we talked
about right at the start of this why he
pleaded not guilty today we so far have
not heard that case as he has made the
turn now to other investigations in
front of him including of course that
special counsel investigation on
classified documents yeah we also want
to let you know the viewers at home that
that if he starts to talk about this
case once again we will dip back in but
as Hallie mentioned it sort of turned
into a campaign speech and again a lot
of falsehoods coming out from the former
president I do want to bring that one so
I'm going to go ahead and just jump in
here and say so what let him say what he
wants but America wanted to see what he
had to say because he didn't speak at
the courthouse before as he was
scheduled to per the mainstream media he
didn't speak after the arraignment as
the mainstream media told us they were
confident that he would so we spend much
of the day sitting around waiting for
Donald Trump come to make a statement
now he goes and makes a statement and
NBC decides you know what we don't want
to air uh Donald Trump's campaign so
we're just gonna cut away from it why
not let the user decide to do that is
there really that much else to cover no
of course not because then they go right
into Talking Heads commentary on now I'm
gonna make some commentary of mayo and I
hope that my opinion is shared by many
of you though I know it won't please
everybody but at the very least I'm
willing to share what my opinion is and
then listen to your feedback in the
comments below so first things first I
think Donald Trump would really maybe
this is an unpopular opinion but I think
Donald Trump would really benefit from
no longer talking about the election
fraud stuff I think it's a bad look I
think it makes him look like a sore
loser I think he needs to just put his
pants on and say the pants is the the
past is the past and let that be now we
all understand there were frustrations
around the 2020 election on both sides
but Donald Trump how many times has it
been investigated and declared that the
suitcases of ballots that you're talking
about were used as official locked cases
to put ballots away for the night so
they could count again in the morning
right look we could debate this all day
long the argument here though whether
there were Shenanigans or not is it what
the point is the point is we have bigger
things to talk about bro if you want to
run for 24 run for 24. let's talk about
what matters and that should be the
first thing that Donald Trump talks
about more people agree that this
indictment is weak even Democrats agree
that the indictment is weak one of my
favorite Publications is the economist
they are a phenomenal economic magazine
they hate Trump's guts when I go on runs
and I audio their podcast I laugh at how
angry they get when they talk about
Trump and that's okay I still listen to
them even though they don't necessarily
have to align with everything I believe
because they share perspective
but what they said was a very
interesting argument they said
bringing an indictment against Donald
Trump that is not a bulletproof
indictment that is some kind of half a
strung together indictment against
Donald Trump would be a massive mistake
because it's not going to give like it's
not going to stick so it's not going to
give Democrats the satisfaction they're
looking for and on top of that it's just
going to lead to more distrust by
Republicans in the judicial system and
that is a mistake in fact the actual
article was titled Prosecuting Donald
Trump in the Stormy Daniels case looks
like a mistake the case is too uncertain
and Technical to deliver the clarity
America needs and they essentially talk
about how look if the only thing you've
got is this potential elevation of
falsifying business documents from a
misdemeanor all from one case Stormy
Daniels p people are talking about this
thirty thousand dollars to the doorman
no charges against that people are
talking about the hundred fifty thousand
dollars to uh uh Karen McDougall uh who
uh by the way sued Tucker Carlson
because she thought Tucker Carlson
defamed her when Tucker Carlson went on
to suggest that she was actually
somebody who was extorting Donald Trump
she had her case dismissed In fairness
it's worth noting by a Donald Trump
appointee
obviously Stormy Daniels has also had to
pay fees to Donald Trump for suing
Donald Trump for slander and librarian
cases that have essentially Fallen flat
now that's not to say that what they're
alleging that sexual affair didn't
happen but the point is the Karen
McDoodle McDougall the the uh Playboy
actress uh or model and this hotel door
person no charges from those just
charges from the Donald uh related to
Stormy Daniels those are where the 11
instances of invoice and check and
journal entry were Amplified
three times each for 33 felony counts
plus a duplicate entry so therefore 34
counts of fraud it's a pretty weak case
to then argue that because there were
potentially falsified business records
that violated New York election code not
federal election code which that case
was already
decided not to be prosecuted by federal
election officials but the New York
state election officials along with the
Manhattan D.A suggest well maybe that
was not kosher to Manhattan or or I
should I say New York law that now
elevates this whole 34 count set to the
lowest level of misdemeanor in New York
when 50 of misdemeanors or sorry
felonies in New York get downgraded to
misdemeanors and then even after a 50
downgrade only another 50 actually get
prosecuted and are Are One cases by the
district attorney which means 75 percent
of felony cases in New York go
unconvicted
the odds look good for Trump but what it
actually does and I'll tell you the
economisters right here the economist is
saying if Trump is to be prosecuted it
should be for something that cannot be
dismissed as a technicality and where
the law is clearer the Manhattan DA's
case looks like a mistake this is
Straight From The Economist and that's
incredible to hear from a left-leaning
publication that actually really
dislikes Trump
so with that said what is my reaction to
Donald Trump and what he actually said
in his speech well once we remove the
Russia Russia Russia the raid on
Mar-A-Lago we talk about the election
fraud in 2020. once we get through all
of that I think Donald Trump actually
hits on some things that he should be
hitting on the problem is he really
saves that for the end of his speech I
think that should be the priority of his
speech and that's just my opinion but he
appropriately focuses on the potential
for World War III which is a real
concern for people Financial analysts
interviewed suggest that they are
concerned to the tune of about 15
percent mostly that we are most at risk
of some kind of massive conflict uh with
Russia so evolving geopolitical risks
about 14 risks from China about 20
percent are worried about risks from the
debt ceiling and then others have
lingering fears over what could be
sticky inflation those are core issues
that we should be talking about also the
devaluing of the dollar the debt ceiling
what about if I didn't already mentioned
that that's ceiling uh what about uh uh
oil security and reducing gas prices
those are things that should be at the
Forefront of what Donald Trump talks
about so if I had any advice for Donald
Trump it would be very simple stop
talking about the past
start your speech with a very simple
this case should be dismissed you got a
lot of Applause on that one then go
right into look we all know this has
been nothing other than a Witch Hunt but
let's talk about the future because we
want Solutions right right and get
cheers whatever Applause and then go
into the lines that Donald Trump had
some of them I think are a little
extreme like this country is going to
hell all-out nuclear uh World War III uh
and and uh you know Russia is now
joining with China Saudi Arabia has
joined with Iran those are actually
great arguments right there those are
true Russia
and China are trading oil and weapons
and lethal weapons not just unless
lethal or non-lethal weapons Saudi
Arabia hated Iran but now that America
has left a political vacuum and a
military vacuum in the Middle East Saudi
Arabia is like well I guess I may as
well make friends with uh uh the friend
of my enemy the enemy of Saudi Arabia
being the houthis who continue to attack
them and Iran continues to supply the
houthis but now that Saudi Arabia and
Iran and this weird Twisted love
triangle are friends Iran is sending
less weapons to the Third Wheel the
houthis those are the things that people
care about today what about war with
Taiwan or trade restrictions and
inflation
get the past out and let's talk about
the future that's my advice to Trump my
advice to NBC is don't censor that is a
bad look and that's exactly why people
stop viewing door kind of channels
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.