TRANSCRIPTEnglish

CRITICAL Putin Trump "Summit" & F**K YOU"

15m 27s2,823 words397 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

hey everyone me Kevin here we need to

0:01

talk about zalinski Putin and what

0:03

Nicole Shanahan just said because it is

0:05

effed up and a big Fu to her I'll tell

0:08

you why because originally actually

0:10

really liked what she did with the RFK

0:12

campaign but this was a new low I'll

0:14

talk about that in just a moment but

0:15

first let's talk about what's going on

0:17

between Putin and Donald Trump so

0:20

apparently now we are expecting that in

0:23

Saudi Arabia potentially as soon as the

0:26

end of the month we might end up getting

0:28

a conference or a summit between Donald

0:32

Trump and Vladimir Putin now they

0:35

probably won't be the first there

0:37

usually each country will send their

0:39

envoys uh to do their discussing for

0:41

example in the United States we expect

0:43

Michael W Waltz and Steve woff to be

0:46

involved Keith Kelly was obviously also

0:48

expected to be involved he's the retired

0:50

lieutenant general who is now the envoy

0:52

to the uh Russia Ukraine situation it's

0:55

a special post obviously it makes sense

0:56

to have somebody involved in this but

0:58

there's some problems going on on both

1:00

sides here uh first you've got uh Keith

1:03

Kelly suggesting that Europe will not be

1:05

involved and zalinski is like wait we

1:08

don't have anything on the table we this

1:10

is the first time we're hearing about

1:12

this too uh are we going to be involved

1:15

and apparently the expectation is for R

1:18

uh Ukraine to be involved but

1:20

potentially for Putin and Trump to meet

1:23

first hash out a deal or at least the

1:26

framework of a deal or should I say the

1:28

concept of a deal uh and anyway Keith

1:31

Kelly says we they want to draft

1:32

something that's not going to be a Minsk

1:34

2 like a Minsk 2

1:38

2. that's because that framework was

1:40

complicated it was convoluted and there

1:42

were some contradictory elements to it

1:43

in terms of who would be responsible for

1:45

certain things and so while it was good

1:47

in idea its actual framework wasn't that

1:50

functional for practicality uh and it

1:53

led to a lot of violations and problems

1:55

and resentment anyway so the goal is to

1:57

have obviously some form of negotiated

1:59

peace and and I would argue that

2:01

obviously it seems like more is getting

2:03

done now than has gotten done in the

2:05

last you know 3 years on this since the

2:07

invasion happened three years ago now I

2:09

hate to say that because everybody

2:11

thought this would be over very quickly

2:13

well initially nobody thought it was

2:14

actually going to happen then when it

2:15

happened it's like oh this is going to

2:16

be over quickly and apparently not it's

2:18

still going on uh Now Keith Kelly thinks

2:21

that we're going to have about a 180-day

2:23

negotiating period here and then by year

2:25

end hopefully we could actually have a

2:27

full conclusion which I imagine both

2:29

sides would be very grateful not to go

2:31

through another winter at War winters at

2:33

War especially and that Russian Tundra

2:35

are not that great uh and the Ukrainian

2:38

territories as well since you've got

2:40

fighting going on on both sides uh now

2:42

uh what is interesting is Keith Kelly

2:44

talks about uh Europe being involved to

2:47

a limited extent now this is somewhat

2:49

problematic because obviously uh Ukraine

2:51

sees itself as part of Eastern Europe

2:53

you know 40% of Russia after all is in

2:55

Europe uh and Ukraine wants to be uh a

2:59

potential future NATO member but sounds

3:01

like they'd be willing to sort of

3:02

exclude that uh from the negotiations

3:06

right now like it it seems like zinsky

3:08

is not dead set on okay yeah we

3:11

definitely need NATO membership because

3:12

I think he realizes that's not going to

3:15

happen uh now as far as the European

3:19

Union it's worth noting that you know he

3:22

in the future does see himself wanting

3:25

to be part of the European Union uh in

3:27

fact they were part they were preparing

3:29

to formally apply for European union

3:31

membership in 2024 to try to eventually

3:34

get into the EU by about the 2030 time

3:38

frame now whether or not that happens or

3:40

what conditions of this deal that get

3:42

worked out end up happening we don't

3:44

really know uh it's entirely possible

3:46

that the conditions of any kind of

3:48

negotiated deal end up saying you'll

3:50

never be part of the EU I would imagine

3:51

that's what Russia wants I'm looking at

3:53

some details right now over the

3:54

newswires I'm actually getting two sort

3:56

of unrelated newswire topics here musk

3:58

Doge begins fir workers at the federal

4:00

it department and apple aims to boost

4:03

Vision Pro with AI features and spatial

4:05

content good there not much going on

4:07

over there but anyway as far as Russia

4:08

Ukraine we've got some uh headlines here

4:10

uh coming just coming through the the

4:12

tape basically lavro and Rubio expressed

4:15

willingness to cooperate on

4:16

international issues including this

4:18

negotiation that ends up happening uh in

4:20

Saudi Arabia the Saudi Arabian

4:23

negotiation by the way is expected to

4:24

take place in coordination or mediation

4:28

with the National Security advisor of

4:30

Saudi Arabia this is Muhammad bin Salam

4:33

he has actually previously helped the

4:35

United States negotiate with Iran so

4:37

Saudi Arabia obviously very oil rich

4:39

country has been seen as a mediator in a

4:41

lot of this uh We've also got uh the uh

4:46

fren uh sorry the Finnish president

4:48

apparently now saying the United States

4:49

has provided Europeans with a

4:51

questionnaire on what would be possible

4:54

for Ukraine this is actually really

4:56

interesting so even though they suggest

4:58

that Europe might not be part of

5:00

detailed

5:01

negotiations uh or or only be involved

5:03

in limited negotiations it does sound

5:05

like there's at least an effort on the

5:07

behalf of the Trump Administration to

5:09

question or survey what European

5:11

countries want to see for Ukraine so I

5:14

think this is a good thing this is this

5:15

is not bad uh then uh we have let's see

5:19

here zalinsky says critical minerals

5:20

deal proposed by the US is not ready and

5:23

doesn't protect us there was this idea

5:25

that potentially 50% of Ukrainian

5:27

critical minerals could end up going to

5:28

the United States which Selinsky at

5:30

least in part rejected this is obviously

5:32

part of the large wealth that exists

5:34

within Ukraine 90% of energy development

5:37

that can occur in Ukraine or energy

5:38

resources that are possible in Ukraine

5:41

from natural extraction you can build an

5:43

electrical plant anywhere just

5:44

clarifying that uh are or in the Deno

5:47

region you know along the river and this

5:50

portion of uh the Eastern flank has been

5:52

basically the focus of this land grab by

5:54

Russia and I think that's what Russia

5:56

wanted all along is the natural

5:58

resources that are there it's very Age

5:59

of Empires esque style kind of like not

6:02

unlike what Donald Trump wants to do

6:04

with Canada and and UK um Greenland or

6:07

even Panama the this is like Age of

6:08

Empires get control of resources right

6:11

which I know you know Americans are

6:12

excited about but obviously people of

6:14

Canada aren't you know this morning in

6:16

in our course member live stream which

6:17

we're now doing on weekends we were

6:19

talking about how uh 90% no I'm sorry it

6:22

was 80 hold on I have this written then

6:24

let me just look at the data 80% of

6:28

conservatives

6:30

say they're not interested in being

6:32

annexed by the United States 97% of

6:36

Liberals are not interested in being

6:38

annexed by the United States uh and it

6:40

looks like uh Province bases between 90

6:43

or sorry 82 and uh 94% of the various

6:47

different provinces do not want to be

6:49

annexed by the United States uh but

6:51

anyway uh zilinsky has also argued that

6:55

uh the currently the most influential

6:56

member in NATO is actually Vladimir

6:58

Putin which is you know kind of

7:00

obviously a slam at uh the power of NATO

7:03

but remember zeni's only way to survive

7:06

here is by continuing to get funding

7:07

from Europe and the United States so if

7:10

Donald Trump is leans more pro-russian

7:13

and zalinski isn't included in these

7:15

first rounds of talks it's entirely

7:17

possible that zilinski is just going to

7:18

kind of get like here's the deal sign it

7:21

otherwise the funding dries up all right

7:23

and you don't get any security so I

7:24

wouldn't be surprised if he ends up

7:26

getting sort of his arm Twisted into a

7:27

deal it's not a surprise to me that he's

7:29

is not being included in what appear to

7:31

be these first rounds of negotiations

7:33

with Putin uh now a lot of Americans are

7:35

actually really excited about the idea

7:37

of not funding Another War and I'm

7:40

absolutely for that as well I'm a big

7:41

fan of do not fund like we don't want to

7:44

keep Wars going uh what we want to do is

7:47

get to resolutions to war that doesn't

7:49

mean you want to abandon Ukraine and I

7:52

think that's a very important Duality

7:53

here to consider is abandoning Ukraine

7:57

is bad remember Russia is willing to

8:02

assassinate or to bomb Western targets

8:06

they tried attack U assassinating the

8:09

German arms dealer uh you know one of

8:11

the CEOs of a German arms manufacturing

8:13

company uh they've uh allegedly planted

8:16

incendiary devices into DHL and uh you

8:18

know basically shipping packages are you

8:21

good man I'm in the middle of filming

8:22

you want to say hi you can come say hi

8:24

if you want uh so these incendiary

8:26

devices were actually implanted and sort

8:28

of embedded into

8:31

massagers uh

8:33

and many of them have actually blown up

8:36

too early so you've had a premature

8:38

detonations or they've been caught by

8:40

security uh but you know there this is

8:43

part of Russia Russia is willing to do

8:47

this now that's not to say the United

8:48

States CIA probably wouldn't either uh

8:50

but something to consider about this

8:53

this agency that exists right now within

8:56

the intelligence arm uh of Russia is

9:00

this new intelligence arm sprouted up in

9:03

2023 after the conflict with Ukraine

9:06

which makes you wonder is it because of

9:08

the US funding or would it have happened

9:10

anyway but anyway uh this uh this unit

9:13

it's called the special tasks unit uh it

9:16

is in the military headquarters in

9:18

Russia uh it's a covert group of

9:21

Assassins basically uh and uh you know

9:25

these facilities grow so the the tool

9:28

here is to try to create Terror and fear

9:30

not just physical fear of of bombs and

9:33

threats and killings but also

9:35

potentially of of a social influence uh

9:38

We've we've all heard about you know

9:40

Russian propaganda and Bot Farms before

9:42

I mean the same is probably done in the

9:43

United States like it seems like it

9:45

would be reasonable or logical I would

9:47

say for campaigns to have a bunch of Bot

9:49

Farms that like vote up every tweet that

9:52

you make to sort of like ignite the

9:54

algorithm uh if you will uh but anyway

9:57

uh I just

10:00

can't help myself but think that people

10:03

are oversimplifying what's going on in

10:05

this uh in this conflict uh for example

10:08

I think a big sort of fu is in store to

10:12

somebody that actually you know I had

10:14

some respect for uh this is uh Nicole

10:19

Shanahan she worked very very well I

10:24

thought on the RFK campaign and I'm a

10:26

big fan of uh some of the things that

10:27

RFK does not everything you know some of

10:30

his previous skepticisms which he's

10:32

walked back I was a little concerned

10:33

about but uh make America healthy again

10:36

I am so so excited about this and I've

10:38

made videos about this before bye Jack

10:40

love you I'll be out shortly uh but take

10:43

a look at this if you go uh look at this

10:46

tweet and you tell me I mean maybe you

10:48

think this is great and and fine I just

10:51

think it's an overs simplistic argument

10:53

and I actually think it's it's like a

10:56

kind of C thing to say uh very very it's

10:59

it's low it's unproductive it's

11:02

illogical but you know what it does is

11:04

it drives populism this idea that you

11:07

know I'm going to say something because

11:09

I know my Bas will like it so I don't do

11:12

that I am I am willing to say things

11:14

that are unpopular because it's what I

11:16

truly believe like I don't look at

11:18

Twitter to try to find things that are

11:20

popular to say I don't try to Echo what

11:23

everybody else is saying and I think

11:24

that's actually what makes this Channel

11:26

Unique because you get a different

11:27

perspective but this idea that zalinsky

11:29

has not been invited to the US Russia

11:31

meeting and then she says it's an adults

11:33

only meeting you know what funicle

11:36

absolutely Fu it is a horrible thing to

11:39

say hundreds of thousands of ukrainians

11:42

and innocent you know people uh as well

11:45

as Russians have lost their lives and to

11:49

say that 1/ half or 50% of the

11:52

negotiation is not invited to their own

11:56

damn negotiation is a thing to say

11:59

f Nicole you should delete that post

12:01

because it's disgusting and it makes you

12:03

look like a vile human being so with

12:07

that said again I am all for ending this

12:11

so we can stop blowing money on this

12:13

much money that we were spending on on

12:15

foreign interests uh and and try to

12:18

refocus some of that at home but we have

12:20

to remember there is a balance you know

12:22

people coming to me they're like Kevin

12:23

we spend so much money on forign a do we

12:26

do you know how much money we actually

12:28

spend on for outside of the military you

12:30

know the Department of Defense right

12:32

because a lot of like this military

12:34

funding is just equipment that we spend

12:36

through the Department of Defense you

12:37

know we buy uh 5.56 rounds you know NATO

12:40

ammunition uh tanks Jets whatever and

12:43

then we kind of give away our old stock

12:45

so it kind of like goes into Old budgets

12:47

and then we just take it out of the

12:48

warehouse and ship it away so these are

12:50

billions of dollars of donations but

12:51

they're not really new money they just

12:53

kind of keep our manufacturing base

12:54

going but outside of military funding

12:58

foreign aid only spend about

13:01

1.5% on foreign aid so this this lie

13:05

that Elon Musk says about 50 million of

13:07

condoms it also pisses me off because

13:10

Elon you know it wasn't for $50 million

13:12

of condoms there are hospitals in Gaza

13:16

that are saving children's lives

13:18

mother's lives fathers innocent people's

13:21

lives that can't survive anymore because

13:25

$50 million of condom funding was cut

13:28

that's a lie now if you want to say we

13:31

are going to cut off funding for

13:33

children and moms delivering their kids

13:35

and and injured innocent civilians in

13:37

Gaza that's fine but at least have the

13:40

balls to say it Doge cut funding for a

13:43

freaking children's hospital and

13:44

innocent people now we can make the

13:46

argument that oh well there are

13:48

terrorists in them or whatever then make

13:49

that argument but stop this lie that it

13:52

was $50 million in condoms is bull crap

13:56

some of it may have been allocated to

13:58

condoms Maybe $10000

13:59

was out I'm not saying it's right I'm

14:01

not saying there's not waste but let's

14:03

use some logic here let's put our hats

14:05

on that actually say you know what does

14:07

this really make sense let's dig a

14:09

little bit deeper into this and then

14:11

Elon Musk is in the Oval Office go you

14:13

know I make mistakes too by the way the

14:15

$50 million cost that's ridiculous it's

14:18

it's like he's trying to cover under the

14:20

idea of making mistakes knowingly share

14:22

lies and it's just things like this that

14:24

lead me to start to disrespect people

14:27

more and I have so much ad ation for the

14:29

things that Elon does but stop

14:31

perpetuating lies and this idea that

14:34

people even engage with this stuff this

14:36

oh it's an adults only meeting 50% of

14:38

the negotiation can't be at the table

14:40

that's dumb could you imagine getting

14:42

divorced and the judge says sorry sir

14:46

this is an adults only meeting I will

14:48

only negotiate with your wife what even

14:53

vice versa right it doesn't matter if

14:55

it's a negotiation a mediation the

14:57

parties of the negotiation should be in

14:59

involved it's it just

15:01

seems disrespectful and it kind of does

15:05

seem

15:06

like if zilinski isn't involved more

15:09

that there is a little bit of favoritism

15:10

towards Russia here over Ukraine that

15:13

Ukraine is sort of like the side chick

15:15

nobody cares about hey maybe you don't

15:18

care maybe they don't care then say it

15:21

have the koness to say it

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.