The Project Veritas Pfizer Vaccine Scandal | The Media Massacre

in this video we're going to break down

my reaction to the project Veritas a

Pfizer elique we're going to identify

potential holes but we're also going to

identify the most concerning issue out

of all of this in this video let's get

started that's [ __ ] that's like

lying to you right I mean that's

straight up lying to you it's like no we

don't do that but we do that it's gotten

a lot of attention but I'm actually

extremely frustrated by where it is not

getting the attention that it actually

rightfully deserves

and it has to do with project Veritas

and the Pfizer story now in the past

project Veritas has done both great

things and not so great things

I say that up front because I want to be

very clear here that even though in what

I'm about to say I I support what

Veritas is doing I think there are some

things that they could do better uh even

in this case here and hopefully uh some

of that advice will will translate over

to them but in addition uh I if what

what they've uncovered is true I really

support what they're doing

uh and I want to be clear that my goal

is to go into this as neutrally as

possible so

basically project Veritas set up uh the

potential grinder date between an

unnamed reporter and this individual

here

and this individual on camera here is

allegedly a director of research at

Pfizer

and the reason I say allegedly is

actually because project Veritas gives

some limited information proving that

this person works at Pfizer but I think

we need a little bit more confirmation

now I'm going to go through some of

their evidence

and it's a bad look that Pfizer has not

actually come out yet to say that this

person either does or does not work for

Pfizer because if the person didn't work

at Pfizer wouldn't Pfizer come out

immediately and go we don't know who

that is this is staged right so so far

I'm heavily leaning in the direction of

suggesting project Veritas is probably

right and suggesting this is a Pfizer

employee and and again we're going to go

through their evidence in just a moment

uh and what really shocks me and I want

to say this up front what really shocks

me is that the mainstream media is not

covering this

the only people covering this are small

media channels the Wall Street Journal

the New York Times The Washington Post

none of them are covering Project

veritas's work on this

and I think that's a disgrace because at

bare minimum cover it and and address

where the potential holes are right and

I've already kind of given the biggest

pull the biggest hole is do we for sure

know that this person did indeed work at

Pfizer we know that they end up labeling

that this person works at Pfizer but we

we don't have that fact right we don't

have that uh uh that that that uh that

absolute proof and but I do think that

mainstream media should be covering this

but they're not and that makes me very

concerned that we need to be even more

skeptical of mainstream media why is it

that and I'm not tinfoil hat okay I'm

like like definitely I don't think I'm

tin foil hat but

why is it not being covered that makes

me concerned and it makes me skeptical

at least Again cover it and then say

like hey these are unsubstantiated but

this is what they're saying but there's

zero coverage at all and we know

Pfizer's got lots of money we also know

that uh the Wall Street Journal uh

editorial board just had one of their

members not even the full Wall Street

Journal editorial board but just one of

their members came out and talked about

hey maybe the bivalent booster shot is

not a good idea maybe the bivalent

booster shot is not safe and maybe it's

way less effective than the CDC and FDA

actually suggested it would be and then

they ended up themselves proving it's

not that safe and effective right

only one member of the Wall Street

Journal editorial board got published

saying that so I think there's a really

big issue with mainstream media remotely

criticizing big Pharma and that's bad

because if mainstream media is scared of

big Pharma then then we don't get the

coverage we deserve As Americans or

people in the world really everybody

would benefit from that so I'm not going

to go through all of this but I'm going

to play a little bit of this uh and then

I'm going to add some of my reactions

and commentary so we'll jump around a

little bit in this let's go ahead and

play some of it talking about mutating

covet well that's not what we say to the

public no don't tell anyone yeah

first story like no you know the virus

keeps mutating yeah well one of the

things we're explaining is like why

don't we just mutate it ourselves so we

could work on quickly develop new

vaccines right right so we have to do

that if we're gonna do that though

there's a risk of like as you could

imagine no one wants to be having a

farmer company

like very controlled to make sure that

there's virus it doesn't create

something like you know it still is

everywhere something crazy

to be honest like it makes no sense that

these eyes walked out of nowhere

all right so let's let's break this down

because there's a lot of information to

break down here and there's a lot to

understand uh about uh how how well some

of the science involved I'm not a

scientist but I'm going to do my best

so the first thing that you have to

understand is the difference between

genetic engineering and gain of function

this becomes very very important because

uh fauci for example said uh in a video

uh in Congressional testimony that no we

don't use gain of function research but

then there have been links to fauci uh

actually potentially being aware of gain

of function research happening at Labs

like the Wuhan lab in in China which

some say there are links and there may

be I didn't research this part so I want

to be clear about that but there may be

links to U.S funding to that Wuhan lab

right anyway this is also where Elon

Musk has come out and suggested oh fauci

new fauci lied prosecute Fouche Elon

suggested that I don't think Elon should

really be like

going that far in terms of making those

allegations let other people make those

allocations allegations and then maybe

reply like oh like he does with the

Curious face or like this deserves

investigation like that's fine like

bring attention to it but you know when

you go too political especially when

you're trying to attract advertisers

from a business CEO point of view bad

idea for the purposes of business

that's not saying it's a bad idea for

the purposes of humanity right again I'm

a big fan of Elon bringing attention to

things uh but but he's also kind of got

to consider that hey wait a minute like

we don't want to bankrupt Twitter

because guess what if you bankrupt

Twitter and this is where I know a lot

of people like Kevin if the most

powerful person in the world can't say

it why should he self-silence himself

I'm like I'm not I'm trying I want I

want Twitter to be preserved because

Google actually and YouTube are removing

this content from the internet that's

why I'm not gonna play all of it because

they're removing this they're censoring

this and I don't think that's right uh

and so I'm not I'm not gonna play the

whole thing uh uh obviously but I want

to comment on it and and bring it to the

attention of everyone uh but I believe

that if Twitter goes bankrupt you

actually lose more free speech than if

it stays alive right so I think there's

there's like this duality of like bring

attention to issues and let them share

or get shared but but don't make

advertisers run away from you Elon

because we need Twitter right so big fan

of free speech obviously we need Twitter

okay so now

we have to understand a little bit about

the difference between gain a function

and genetic engineering so genetic

engineering is pretty simple uh genetic

engineering can be done through cross

breeding for example watermelons where

to some degree you want seedless

watermelons you just basically only

breed watermelons without uh uh the big

black seeds and they get smaller and

smaller and smaller over time it's how

you get sort of seedless watermelons

right but that's sort of more like some

people would say that's not even genetic

and Engineering anymore another form of

genetic engineering would be you

actually this is probably more genetic

engineering for the main purposes here

is you take DNA and then maybe you uh

slice out

a uh a corrupt portion of DNA that maybe

gives a person asthma for example and

instead you insert the proper base pairs

that remove that defect strain of DNA

the defective strain and now maybe

somebody's asthma is cured that has not

actually happened yet in humans but

those are the goals of genetic

engineering uh obviously humans and

human biology is substantially more

complicated because your DNA is

replicating thousands of times probably

per second in your body uh and uh this

is very complicated to try to reprogram

your whole body it's kind of like once

you have it you're probably stuck for a

while uh at least into the future with a

virus it's a lot easier because you're

talking about essentially a single cell

organism and you can manipulate the DNA

of a virus to maybe do different things

now it's one thing if you manipulate a

virus and you take out its ability to

infect other things right now what

you're actually doing is you're reducing

the virality of a virus you're making

that virus less capable well that's

different from gain of function so you

can do genetic engineering without

making a virus worse right

now to some degree uh genetic

engineering is used to manipulate

viruses so that way okay maybe if you

evolve into this we already have a

vaccine for that you evolve into that we

already have a vaccine for that

obviously there's a profit motive to

genetic engineering because if viruses

can be engineered uh in such a way that

we kind of know which way they're going

to evolve and you can create vaccines

for those the people who want to take

those well then and end up taking those

and buying those then Pfizer could

potentially make more money right

ultimately it all goes back to money

that's obvious and and I don't think

anybody who's a capitalist is opposed to

people making money we're opposed to

people lying to us okay that's bad

or doing really bad things like

potentially potentially gain a function

so what is gain a function gain a

function is also a genetic modification

but it's a genetic via a genetic

modification that allows a virus to

literally gain a function so think about

like a tool that it didn't previously

have so think about that kind of like a

human virus that doesn't infect cats but

it's now genetically modified to where

it and all of a sudden it can infect

cats now the virus has gained a function

it can now infect something it

previously couldn't and the belief is

that through the Wuhan lab League theory

of how covet got out that gain of

function research was being used and

this this basically covet the original

strain of covid and and Delta or

whatever all stem from a lab leak

because gain of function research was

maybe being operated on viruses that

only affected bats but now was

engineered to infect humans and then it

got out oops now you have a coveted

pandemic in a disaster

so this is why gain of function has

received a really really really bad

reputation and uh everybody pretty much

politically says it doesn't happen

it probably does happen

and that could be intentional or

unintentional because again if you're

genetically engineering

at some point you're going to

accidentally

create gain a function it's in my

opinion it's kind of like like saying

like oh yeah no we don't do gain a

function we just do genetic modifying

but then oops we absolutely accidentally

happen to provide a function gain to a

virus so I think that's kind of useful

to know I think it's also also useful to

know that in 2010 a federal jury awarded

1.37 million dollars in Damages to a

former Pfizer scientist who claimed that

she was sickened by genetic a

genetically engineered virus at a

company lab

uh the closing facts of that case

actually were pretty damning showing

that she was basically ignored her

concerns about health and safety and

improper ventilation and a broken vent

Hood were ignored and that now she

suffers from uh partial paralysis

occasionally uh the potassium disorder

uh and that when she addressed this

issue with her bosses and supervisors

she was threatened that if she brought

light to these issues she would just

receive bad performance reviews she

ended up getting fired didn't return to

work sued one one point three seven

million dollars in Damages over this so

Pfizer has not had the best reputation

for you know health and safety over

profit which again not a surprise I

think the biggest surprise is the

mainstream media's unwillingness to

cover uh this sort of story so

what we have here is the title of this

Jordan Tristan Walker guy Pfizer

director of research and development

strategic operations and mRNA scientific

planning that is veritas's claim right

the big concern that I have uh is is

where how do we verify that that the

person acts actually worked at uh

fertilizer and uh project Veritas has

started releasing some of that evidence

for example this breaking a new Pfizer

Insider just sent me an image of Jordan

Trish and Walker's internal Microsoft

teams profile showing he's still an

active employee of the pharmaceutical

giant if you have any more information

contact us

now as an outsider this looks pretty

damning right we see the advisor if you

see the prior screenshots project

Veritas has put up as well like uh

spookio profiles showing the potential

for an at Pfizer uh you know it it all

kind of aligns that this person probably

did end up working at Pfizer uh the

person's LinkedIn profile has

disappeared but what bothers me a little

bit and I just want to make it clear is

I wish that before project Veritas

released uh their video I wish they

would have fully documented everything

they could have gotten their hands on

about the person and how they're linked

to Pfizer like full LinkedIn profile you

know any kind of documentation that this

person works for Pfizer and put a little

bit more effort into that because then I

think it would have if they could

without a doubt prove that this person

actually worked for Pfizer which so far

I'm inclined to believe then maybe it

could have finally gotten the mainstream

media to wake up and cover this because

I think that's sort of the biggest crime

is that the mainstream media isn't

covering this and instead it's it's

basically being censored and buried so

I'm concerned about that story and I'm

most concerned about the fact that this

individual which I won't play that part

of the video but when when it sort of

gets discovered uh that he's being

filmed he freaks out there's a tussle he

grabs uh uh O'Keefe's uh um iPad when

when Okie fends up uh confronting him as

the the person on the date goes away

grabs the iPad throws it gets locked in

the police got it's just a complete

disaster We're not gonna play all of

that uh but but my

bottom line take out of all of this is

uh that I actually think it's a great

thing that there are companies like

project Veritas that are covering this

sort of stuff uh because now it's going

to push for more transparency first of

all it demands responses from Pfizer and

Pfizer has two choices they can either

well actually they have three choices

they can uh address it and admit the

person worked there and fire them uh and

and then say that hey like you know

clarify like this is what we do maybe we

do engineering but we don't do gain a

function right like that's really all

they'd have to do and at least it would

do some damage control but right now

they're completely silent they're silent

because the mainstream media isn't

covering it and that's the scariest part

is that the mainstream media isn't

covering it and their silence is kind of

like so he does and you do right like

that's that's bad

uh and then of course the other option

is saying No this person doesn't work

here we're being set up that person's

never worked here those are fake

screenshots or whatever that's the other

option too right and so that's why I'm

I'm trying to take as much of a neutral

POV here because you've even got Marco

Rubio sending like demand letters now uh

saying look Pfizer you need to respond

to this which they should they should

respond to this but I understand they

might also have that POV of like oh well

you know if we respond to it it's going

to bring more attention to the issue

personally

what I'm seeing here does not look good

it first of all looks very bad for how

embed the mainstream media and Pharma

probably is

almost certainly is uh and it certainly

doesn't look good that there hasn't been

a response from Pfizer yet because it

does sort of imply that yeah the problem

person probably did work at Pfizer or

maybe still does and uh and you know

what the person was saying was

kind of alarming so it'd be nice to have

a little bit more insight into that

because I think the biggest allegation

out of all of it was and even though it

was cut up in in a way where it probably

seems a little bit more damning

you can't cut up the part where he says

well that's not what we say publicly

right people don't want to hear that

that's scary that's kind of like Twitter

saying oh we don't Shadow ban people

we just visibility filter people that's

[ __ ] that's like lying to you right

I mean that's straight up lying to you

it's like no we don't do that but we do

that and that's the biggest concern uh

and and so I'm glad that more attention

is coming to this

and there's certainly more uh to come on

this but I I absolutely wanted to bring

attention to this because I think it's

very important