Trump Responds: HELL is Coming.

Hey everyone, me Kevin here. It's

another deranged day where we have yet

more dead who just want to live in

peace. I don't care if you're Jewish or

Palestinian or German or American.

People who want to live in peace deserve

to live in peace. Yet here we are again.

And just moments ago, Donald Trump

released one of his first statements.

But I expect major action is going to

follow very soon. and I'm going to break

down exactly what I think Donald Trump

is going to do next. Now, whether you or

not you like Donald Trump, I don't think

should stand in the way of the history

of what we know about Donald Trump

versus prior presidents. Let's go back

to Obama for example, and then we'll

talk about the details of these

shootings, the 11 killed in Sydney,

Australia at Bondi Beach. This is

absolutely devastating. We're going to

talk about this. We're going to look at

the actual site of the disaster and the

hell. We're also going to briefly catch

you up about now that we have a shooter

in his 20s in custody from the Brown

shooting, a suspected shooter. We don't

know yet with confirmation. And we've

also got to talk about the three

Americans just killed yesterday in

Syria. Or how about 2 and 1/2 weeks ago

when a Muslim Afghan shot two West

Virginia National Guard service members,

killing one. Folks, this is pure

derangement. And you know how Obama

fought derangement? Obama fought

derangement, not with red lines. We know

that has a reputation for not having

worked out very well, though some say

everything ended up working out anyway,

but that's also really a topic for a

different video. There's a lot of debate

around red lines. No, Obama was Mr.

Drone Strike man. He got a reputation

for the White House debating over 500

different drone strikes trying to

evaluate whether or not their attacks

would end up killing innocent civilians

as to whether or not they should

authorize the pulling of the trigger. So

anytime Sentcom or really any of our

commanders had the suspicion that they

needed to launch a drone strike drone

strike against a target, get on the

phone with DC and get the green light to

do so. But I believe that Donald Trump

was elected in part again whether you

like him or not. I believe that Donald

Trump was elected because people look at

Donald Trump as somebody who says he's

going to surround himself and we might

not like the people he surrounds himself

with. Okay, some of them uh leave

something to be desired. But the

intention was that Trump would surround

himself with people that Trump would

empower and then let them make the

decisions in a very gloves off manner.

In other words, rather than the White

House and a group of lawyers debating

every drone strike or Biden doing

nothing in terms of drone strikes, they

really scaled back drone strikes a lot

after Obama. We think that broadly

Donald Trump would be the kind of

president who says, "Look, we already

know the slogan peace through strength."

But what does that mean? It means gloves

off. It means let the American military

respond and fight and finish the fight

against radical terrorists who do not

want freedom. That's what these people

are. These people with boltaction

rifles. This individual believed to be

24 from Pakistan with a boltaction rifle

essentially sniping people. In in the

video footage, you could see what

appears to be he's at least decently

trained uh exchanging hand signals with

his cohort who is an idiot who ended up

getting tackled. Uh thank goodness he

ended up getting tackled. Uh I mean this

was actually incredible footage. If you

haven't seen it yet, this this isn't

graphic, but it's worth seeing. I mean

this is just remarkable. Look at this.

Look at this. somebody here standing and

hiding behind a car as this individual

with a double-barreled shotgun uh ends

up getting tackled. Now, what's worth

noting about a double-barreled shotgun,

and I'll show the clip in just a moment,

but what's worth noting about a

double-barreled shotgun is you can load

these with different types of

ammunition. Uh because I I believe, and

I don't know this, I've never shot one

like this. I've shot many shotguns

before, but not double stack. And I

believe you can load these with

different types of ammunition. I did end

up seeing buckshot on the floor, but if

you end up using slugs, these things are

like snipers. It's worth remembering

that, and that's why I mentioned this.

So, for example, one that I, you know,

one devastating strategy that I've seen

people do on the range, when I take my

shotgun, which is built on an AR-15

platform, what some people will do, uh,

is they'll load their mags with a slug

and buckshot. Slug, buckshot. And so it

means every other shot you got a close

shot, you got a range shot, close shot,

range shot. Devastating. These weapons

are really devastating. These are

killing weapons. They're so terrible.

They're really like for like zombie

apocalypses. Uh it's terrible. But slugs

in a shotgun are incredibly brutal and

they are like snipers. They are very

accurate. You can hit a target from very

far away. And so this is devastating.

So, when people hear shotgun, sometimes

they think only up close. Why is this

person sniping with a shotgun? If you

got the right ammunition in, this is

like a sniper. It's devastating. But

anyway, take a look at this take down

here. Uh, you know, there's a lot of

debate around this takedown, too. A lot

of people are saying that this

individual here, mind you, in the white

shirt, who is also Muslim. At least

that's what's believed, right? I mean,

like, I get it. A lot of people are

like, "Oh, here we go again. It's the

Muslims killing. The Muslims are

incompatible with society or whatever."

I I don't believe that. I think there

are a lot of radicals that are

incompatible with society. I don't think

that just because somebody is Muslim,

they are automatically a radical. But I

mean, like, you know,

there are a lot of historical examples

of Muslims who are radicalized from the

faith that they have as a foundation and

then somehow they get triggered and

radicalized. I mean the Boston Marathon,

those were self-radicalized

Muslim brothers. The uh Madrid Madrid

train bombings or or attacks rather. Uh

this was al-Qaeda inspired slash

affiliated. The Chetchin uh separatist

for the Moscow theater. Remember the

devastating Moscow theater? People are

running for the exits and they're

getting gunned down in a theater by

what? Five, six different gunmen with

rifles. This is terrible. the uh uh

Beirut embassy bombing, Islamic jihad.

This is all in the name of jihad. Uh the

Iranian embassy takeover in the 80s, the

Paris Nice, uh this was disast

absolutely disastrous in the east

attack, ISIS or ISIS inspired at least

9/11, al-Qaeda, right? This is terrible.

So, so yeah, I mean obviously there are

links with terror groups and Islam, but

that doesn't make everybody who is, you

know, an adherent of Islam or a Muslim a

terrorist. Uh, and and so I mean, this

person's a hero right here. What a

badass. You know, you've got you've got

this co-shooter,

so the partner of the person who's

getting tackled here on a bridge just to

the right

could easily kill this 43y old

and yet he's tackling the guy with a

shotgun.

Is his incredible bravery. Now,

this is the moment where a lot of people

say he should have shot him, but he

doesn't. He ends up putting the gun down

in front of the tree. This guy walks

back to the bridge. Now, as this guy

walks back to the bridge, he ends up

teaming up with his homie again, and

they keep freaking shooting. So, yeah,

the guy's a hero for disarming him. And

I understand why some people are like,

"You should have killed him."

The guy's still a hero. It doesn't make

him less of a hero.

But the point is, this is devastating.

This is the map. By the way, uh this was

the Hanukkah celebration on the lawn.

You had about a thousand celebrating uh

Hanukkah here, the start of Hanukkah. Uh

this first arrow here I drew is where

you just saw that uh video footage of

that disarmment. That was really

impressive. Uh and then this is sort of

the trajectory of shooting though. You

do end up if you see bridge videos,

you'll see shooting in all directions

because you have police converging to uh

fire upon them. Uh keep in mind that one

of these shooters was Pakistani

allegedly and just 24 years old. 12

people were killed, at least the latest

numbers here. Two shooters. 6:47 p.m.

the shooting begins. 12 people killed,

29 individuals injured, two officers

injured. One of the shooters is dead.

One of the shooters is in critical

condition. They had an ID in their car.

Benjamin Netanyahu criticizes the PM in

Australia for not stopping the disease

of hatred. But that's the problem. Okay,

that's the problem. You can't just say,

"Oh, because some Muslims are

terrorists, everyone is bad who's

Muslim."

How do you target just the radicals? And

that's where I think Donald Trump is

going to go off on terror. We are going

to see, I think, a new war on terror.

And I'm going to combine, this is my

theory here, my opinion. I'm going to

combine the fact that midterms are

coming up with up with this. So moments

ago, Donald Trump says, quote, "There

will be a lot of damage done to the

people that attacked our troops in

Syria." You might remember this.

Yesterday, we had three Americans killed

in Syria. One of them was a translator.

The other two were American soldiers,

and they were on a convoy in Syria. Now,

again, a lot of people say, why why why

is America in Syria? It's to make sure

that Iran, who backs groups like ISIS

and and these terror groups, Hezbollah

and the Houthis and Hamas. It's to make

sure that Iran and Russia doesn't take

control of the power vacuum left after

the fall of the Assad regime in Syria.

So, yeah, we got 2,000 troops in Syria.

Now, I get it. On one hand, people are

like, "Man, why are American soldiers

over there? We shouldn't be over there."

And on the other hand, people are like,

"Yeah, Trump, peace through strength."

How do you have peace through strength

without having American forces in Syria?

It's going to get worse. This is my

opinion. My opinion is that because

Donald Trump knows that right now his

economic plans aren't really helping in

the K-shaped economy of the of recovery

here, right? Uh or suffering is really

what it is right now. because his

economic plans aren't actually helping

right now. His tariffs might actually be

doing the opposite, making things worse

for farmers and, you know, Americans

struggling to to pay the freaking bills.

I think that Donald Trump needs a win.

He needs a big win before midterms. And

so, I suspect that Donald Trump is going

to rage a campaign against terror cells

throughout the world. We already see

what he's doing with targeting

Venezuelan drug drug traffickers on

boats coming to America. Pete Hegsef is

is such a you know take Trump for every

word he says that when Trump says there

will be no survivors in our attacks.

Pete Hgssef at least this is you know

there's big debate around this. Okay I

want to be clear debate about this. Pete

Hex is like yeah launch the Hellfire

missile against that drug trafficking

boat. Oh is that two survivors we see

there? Hit them again. make sure none of

them survive to send a message.

You know, obviously there's a lot of

criticism for this. It's like, hey, is

that a war crime? You know, if people

are surrendering, you know, if they're

floating in water holding on to wreckage

like Rose from the Titanic and you drop

another health hellfire missile on her

over him, you whatever. Uh, you know, I

is that a war crime? And I think while

there the debate rages over that, I

think you have to understand that the

Trump administration's point of view is

right now we don't give a fly an F. We

are going to stop anything that kills

Americans. And I have to say, while I

disagree with a lot of Trump stuff,

okay, I think there's plenty of money

corruption and grift, okay? And I think

so much of it is wrong and borderline

fraudulent, like these crypto companies,

total scam. I'm not calling all crypto

scam, right? I'm just like like old

five, okay, let's just be real, okay? At

$8 or $9, I'm like, "Guys, this is a

scam. It's going to zero. It's like a

buck 50 now. It's already down like 90%.

It's going to keep going. I I I expect

it'll get delisted soon."

Well, I disagree with all that. I have

to say I

maybe this is a big claim. I would feel

safer

standing,

you know, behind the Trump

administration when it comes to peace.

Now, I don't know, right? Maybe that's

an ignorant claim. Maybe we're just

going to end up spawning new wars. But

let's just be real. I'd rather have

somebody that says, "I will protect

Americans at all costs. You spill

American blood, I will absolutely

obliterate you." I like that idea

because I do not like the idea that

people who radicalize others to conduct

these attacks

constantly survive and get away with

this stuff. And so I think Donald Trump

needs a win for midterms and he's going

to get really aggressive. I think we're

going to see a lot of bombings against

ISIS targets. I think we might see

renewed conflict with Iran. I do think

there are chances this could

unfortunately spill over into greater

issues, which obviously then conflicts

with Donald Trump's, you know, no new

wars argument. That said, this isn't

really a new war. Terror isn't really a

new war. These radicalized people who

attack free loving again, Jews or

Americans, I don't really care what you

are, what color your skin is. You you

could be you could be Muslim, you could

be Indian, you could be Pakistan. I I

have nothing to bad to say about any

other human. Unless you're a murderer,

then you're scum. And if Trump's going

to stand up and say, you know what,

we're going to go kill that scum. Well,

then damn it, I support that. Now, let's

understand a little bit more about

what's going on. So, we know that Donald

Trump has argued,

unfortunately, we know that Donald Trump

has argued that the Afghan individual

who shot our National Guard service

members was somebody that was not vetted

properly. The problem was he was

literally vetted by our CIA and he was

authorized. His asylum was granted

essentially under the Trump

administration. So, that doesn't look

too good. So, Donald Trump actually has

a little bit of clean up to do on that

claim. But now the attack in Syria gives

Donald Trump a new license to say, "All

right, we could solve that problem and

the Syrian attack with attacks against

radical blocks. This this radicalization

right here, look at this. Born August

1221. I mean, this person's 24 years

old. This is this is terrible. This is

sad. My sister was born in 2003. You

know, I've got staff that were born in

the early 2000s. And here he is.

Somebody wrote this on X. Navided Aram

was the shooter. I worked laying bricks

with this guy. He was licensed for

firearms. What the heck?

Here's an example of the uh potentially

the bolt-action rifle that was used uh

that was uh in this photo right here.

It's actually kind of interesting to see

somebody in a terrorist attack use a

bolt-action rifle. I I don't think I've

seen something like that before. Uh but

uh you know this this is horrible and

obviously we'll get more details in time

on this. Regarding the Brown shooting,

we know that a person of interest is in

custody and we don't yet know if there

was a radical association with this.

You've got Laura Loomer trying to argue

that, you know, the media is saying this

person barged into the classroom and

shouted something. Uh that's what the

media is saying. And Laura Loomer is

saying that what he said was Allah

Akbar. Now, God is great, right? We

don't know if that's true. Okay, Laura

Loomer is not exactly known as the most

credible source. She is a very extreme

one-sided shill. Let's just call her for

what she is, okay? There is never a

desire to indicate any kind of

neutrality. Anyway, that said, this

these shootings are devastating and

Trump's going to act now. Unfortunately,

as a result of this, you also get a lot

of Jewish versus uh Gaza and Palestinian

drama that unfortunately

boils up in conversation. And I mean,

rightfully so. Israel's been attacked

relentlessly. Palestinians have

absolutely had their homes devastated

under mountains of rubble. I think the

New York Times did an analysis that

indicated that if you took all of the

rubble that's in Gaza and you spread it

out over Manhattan, every square foot of

Manhattan would be buried by 100 lb of

concrete debris.

That's insane.

But take a listen to this. You know,

this person had one take. Oh, sounds

like I've got something playing in the

background. Let me disable some of those

in the background. There we go. All

right. Take a listen to this person's

take.

>> Jews, that's the Jews are coming and did

nothing.

Before Israel did anything for 3 weeks,

Israel didn't do anything. And here

there were marshes and celebrations that

Jews and Israelis because not only Jews,

all the Israelis were killed, Arab

killed, foreign workers killed, German

people were killed like Argentina

everywhere they were killed. And what

did Australia do? our government,

Albanese and Penong. We have $25 million

to Gaza. Why? To make Hamas stronger and

to show people locally that it's okay to

kill people. All right, so let's break

that down for a moment. The Australian

government doesn't give money to the

government of Gaza, which there really

isn't a government. The Palestinian uh

authority really has no power. Hamas is

now a splinter cell group of maybe 30

different cells of terrorists. The

problem with uh this this aid that is

being referenced is a lot of this is aid

to companies like the World Food

Program. Uh Australia gave $6 million to

them, $5 million to UNICEF for children

that are starving, 5 million to the Red

Cross, $2 million for the uh Jordan

Hashmeat charity organization for

medical supplies. In total, they've

given about $130 million. And the vast

majority of this funding has either gone

to shelter, education, basic services,

nutrition and protection programs, food

distribution, medical and service

responses. But that's not the impression

that people are left with. People are

left with I paid tax dollars and it went

to that area and people of that same

religion are now killing my neighbors.

You know, that's what comes across. And

this is exactly why I think that Donald

Trump has a real potential here to score

massive wins amongst otherwise connect

disconnected people. I think Donald

Trump can score massive wins for not

only Jews and Americans, especially

those who've had loved ones killed in

these disasters, but also potentially

massive wins globally by ramping up what

has already existed. It's not a new war,

a war on terror. Ramping up and finally

trying to actually end it, that could

help Trump win the midterms. And so when

Donald Trump says there will be

retaliation and when he says quote

will be a lot of damage done to the

people that attack troops in Syria,

believe him, we might just be getting

started.

>> Why not advertise these things that you

told us here? I feel like nobody else

knows about this.

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

see how it goes.

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

much. People love you. People look up to

you.

>> Kevin Praath there, financial analyst

and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great

to get your take.