TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Fed Close to PANIC RATE CUTS | Emergency Cuts

17m 20s3,017 words428 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Shell Bowman just joined Chris Waller in

0:02

calling for rate cuts as soon as July,

0:04

which is really not being priced in

0:06

markets at all. Most market participants

0:09

believe that we're not going to see rate

0:10

cuts until September. And frankly, a lot

0:13

of people are very confused because last

0:15

year when we had rate cuts right before

0:16

the election, we saw 10-year Treasury

0:19

yields go up over a percent as

0:22

short-term rates fell 1%. Now, the

0:25

reason for that could be because markets

0:28

lower the odds of a recession, which is

0:30

exactly what Michelle Bowman is implying

0:34

along with Chris Waller when they say,

0:36

"Hey, maybe we should consider cutting

0:38

rates sooner." Take a look at this. Nick

0:41

T quotes from Michelle Bowman's piece

0:43

that she describes the labor market as

0:46

solid and near estimates of full

0:48

employment. however, says that there's

0:51

evidence of fragility, reduced labor

0:54

market dynamism, slower economic growth,

0:56

and narrower concentration of job gains,

0:59

warranting that the Fed put quote more

1:02

weight on the downside risks to our

1:04

employment mandate going forward. Okay,

1:07

in English,

1:09

the labor market just isn't creating as

1:11

many jobs in as many places as it used

1:13

to. And given how few vacancies there

1:18

are, any little increase in layoffs

1:22

without those people being able to

1:24

actually find new jobs could skyrocket

1:27

the unemployment rate. Michelle is now

1:29

the second Fed member to say, "Hey, we

1:33

should actually start cutting in July."

1:35

And their argument is that, "Hey, we

1:37

don't actually think we're going to see

1:38

a lot of inflation over the next uh you

1:42

know, few months." Even though Powell

1:44

says the next quarter is going to be

1:46

important, June, July, August to see

1:48

what kind of inflationary impacts

1:49

they're going to be from tariffs,

1:52

Bowman and Waller say no, not so. Now,

1:55

in fairness, if you look at the S&P

1:57

global flash PMIs that just came out

2:00

this morning, this information actually

2:03

supports one side of this equation.

2:07

In the flash PMIs that came out this

2:09

morning, we beat on all three

2:11

categories, manufacturing, services, and

2:13

then obviously when you beat on those,

2:15

you beat on the composite, which is the

2:16

joining of the two. They say even though

2:19

the overall rate of expansion lost a bit

2:21

of momentum from what we saw last year,

2:24

what we're seeing is people are still

2:27

building up inventory and it's leading

2:29

to more hiring. Now, this is interesting

2:32

because in the short term, it means a

2:34

few things. It means we're seeing prices

2:37

go up and job gains. But are those jobs

2:42

going up and those prices going up

2:44

because of the temporary impacts of

2:46

tariffs? And then what happens if prices

2:49

go up and and jobs go up in the short

2:52

term because of tariffs and sort of the

2:53

front running of demand, you know, as

2:56

people try to build up inventory? What

2:58

happens if that catalyst goes away and

3:00

now you don't have to build up stock

3:01

anymore because your shelves are full?

3:03

And so all of a sudden, you take away

3:05

the need to hire to build up that

3:07

inventory and you take away the

3:08

inflationary pressure. Crap. Now you're

3:11

left with a broken jobs market. Which is

3:14

exactly what Chris Waller and Michelle

3:16

Bowman are saying. They're saying,

3:17

"Look, the price increases that we're

3:19

seeing, like even the flash PMIs from

3:21

just this morning are talking about,

3:22

they're going to be one-time increases."

3:24

See, you see it here. Tariffs were also

3:26

blamed widely on higher prices. These

3:29

rose at an especially sharp rate in

3:31

manufacturing and continued to rise

3:33

steeply in services. Uh and even though

3:37

confidence deteriorated slightly, firms

3:40

were taking on more staff because

3:43

companies right now are struggling to

3:44

meet their workloads. And those

3:46

workloads could be because of inventory

3:49

building at companies linked to tariff

3:51

concerns. So, in other words, is the

3:53

boom we're seeing right now a boom

3:55

that's inflationary, or is it a boom

3:58

that's happening because we're trying to

4:01

get ahead of this tariff problem? Take a

4:03

look at the rest of the flash PMI report

4:05

because it's fascinating. Price

4:07

pressures rose sharply across

4:08

manufacturing and services in June.

4:10

Selling prices rose at rates not seen

4:12

since July of 22. When you look at this

4:15

kind of data, you look and say, "Oh my

4:17

gosh, why would the Fed cut right now?"

4:19

These these this is like the worst case

4:21

scenario for the Fed. In fact, in the

4:23

flash PMI report itself, look what they

4:25

write. The data therefore corroborate

4:28

speculation that the Fed will remain on

4:31

hold for some time. So you have this

4:34

really weird situation where the data is

4:38

telling you, oh, businesses are booming

4:41

and they're hiring. But if they're only

4:44

booming right now because of the

4:46

temporary pull forward of tariffs, then

4:48

that actually means we're covering we're

4:50

masking how strong the economy actually

4:54

is. And that's where Waller and Bowman

4:56

come out and say, "Listen, if you look

4:58

at this data and delay cutting rates,

5:01

what you're doing is you're falling

5:03

victim to masked data that the economy

5:07

is actually weakening in the underlying

5:09

environment. And as soon as we get an

5:12

increase in layoffs, it's over. We're in

5:14

a recession. And if we follow this

5:16

masking data where the data looks good

5:19

and we see, oh, look, everything's fine.

5:21

Well, then we end up risking recession,

5:24

which is exactly what you don't want to

5:26

do. So, you've got people like Bowman

5:28

and Waller saying, hey, we think the

5:31

tariff increases of prices will be more

5:33

one-time in nature. uh and then we're

5:36

back to an economy that's sort of like

5:38

okay well you know where where do we sit

5:40

uh and in that case we're in an

5:43

environment of uh oh now we're stuck

5:47

with a crappy jobs market and it's too

5:48

late to cut. So this is why Bowman and

5:51

Waller say, "Hey, let's start cutting

5:52

now." Again, though, look at the flash

5:54

PMI. The rise in prices charts for goods

5:56

and services was the second higher

5:58

highest since September of 2022. Not

6:01

great. And a 12-month high rate of job

6:04

creation in manufacturing was

6:06

accompanied by a 5-year peak in

6:08

services. So on one hand in fairness to

6:12

Powell the hard data is still doing

6:16

really well and the survey data is now

6:20

doing really well. So the survey data is

6:22

usually considered soft data uh and

6:25

actual unemployment numbers would be

6:27

considered hard data but this PMI survey

6:31

suggests that the economy is actually

6:32

doing quite well. It's actually I would

6:34

almost call it a very soft landingesque

6:38

uh PMI report where you have employment

6:41

rising and uh you know you have prices

6:43

accelerating a bit because the economy

6:45

is expanding but again is it simply

6:47

because people are getting ahead of

6:50

tariffs and that's also where we don't

6:52

even know where tariff policy is going

6:54

to end up. So, something to remember is

6:56

that not only does Powell testify in

6:58

Congress this week before uh the House

7:00

and then the Senate. Uh so, we'll hear a

7:03

little bit more from Powell, which will

7:04

probably be him digging in. He might

7:06

even reference this S&P manufacturing uh

7:09

and services report, which is the

7:10

preliminary report for the first two

7:12

weeks of June. Uh but might dig in more

7:15

and say, "Hey, we're just going to wait

7:16

and see." Right now, the odds of a cut

7:19

in July have risen. They've risen to

7:22

22.7%.

7:24

And the odds of a cut in September have

7:27

risen to 73%. At a low last week, we're

7:30

at about a 65% chance of a cut in

7:33

September and closer to like a 5% chance

7:35

of a July cut. But after the Fed meeting

7:38

and that Fed blackout window shut, uh,

7:40

in other words, we were done with the

7:41

Fed blackout period. Thanks, Mr. Jack.

7:43

We ended up getting odds for rate cuts

7:47

in July skyrocket now to about a one in4

7:50

chance. So, it's possible, but it's

7:52

really going to take Powell moving here.

7:54

Now, a lot of people are saying, oh, you

7:56

know, people are just looking for

7:57

Powell's job and that's why, which makes

7:59

sense because, you know, we're probably

8:01

going to get some kind of decision on

8:03

who's going to be the next Fed

8:04

chairperson next, you know, uh, for next

8:07

year this year. So, you know, in May,

8:09

Jerome Powell's job is done in 2026 and

8:12

somebody else will take over. These are

8:13

the current polyarket betting odds.

8:15

Notice you don't see Michelle Bowman on

8:17

here. In fact, technically Elon Musk has

8:20

a higher chance of uh being fed per the

8:24

Fed chairperson than Michelle Bowman

8:25

right now, but people think she might be

8:27

trying to apply for the job as well. Uh,

8:29

and in the meantime, it's also worth

8:32

looking at the calls that we had this

8:34

morning on the Meet Kevin Alpha report.

8:36

This morning in the me alpha report we

8:38

said shortterm look at circle and Tesla

8:42

and that was pre-market. So be and the

8:45

Q's circle Tesla and the Q's. We're like

8:49

geopolitics are by the dip. Tesla might

8:51

break out to the 347 line. Look what

8:54

happened. Straight to 347 straight up.

8:56

Look at that 8% day circle momentum

9:00

likely to continue and the Q's likely to

9:02

run. All three of them hit which is

9:05

pretty impressive. So, if you're not

9:06

part of the alpha report yet, make sure

9:07

you're part of that uh at uh at

9:09

meet.com. I also was asked about AMD and

9:13

suggested that I was less enthused about

9:15

AMD, though it's doing well. You know,

9:17

3.6%. It's nowhere near what Tesla and

9:19

Circle are doing today. Tesla now

9:21

breaking out of the 347 line. Fantastic.

9:25

That said, even just holding 347 today

9:27

is a big deal. Okay, so what what else

9:30

does this really mean? Well, when we

9:31

look at what Nick T says, let's take a

9:33

peek at some of his commentary.

9:36

Nick T uh says, "Should inflation

9:38

pressures remain contained, I would

9:40

support lowering the policy rate as soon

9:43

as our next meeting." Now, it's worth

9:45

remembering we are going to get another

9:47

CPI report next week. We get PCE this

9:51

week, which is really just sort of the

9:52

combination of PPI and CPI from uh May,

9:56

but we will get a PPI and CPI report uh

10:00

next month. So, early next month, we'll

10:02

get that within the first two weeks. And

10:05

then we have Bowman has been very

10:07

focused on inflation risks through last

10:09

year. She says she sees tariffs likely

10:12

to present a quote small and one-off

10:15

increase in prices because she expects

10:18

increased economic slack later this

10:21

year. So this is a really weird balance

10:23

where Powell's trying to fight inflation

10:25

but then you know others are trying to

10:27

fight recession. That's where Jerome

10:29

Powell says the economy could really

10:31

break in either direction. So TBD where

10:34

that ends up going. Uh so that sort of

10:36

leads it to you know does it really make

10:39

a difference in the near term? We could

10:42

get a 25 basis point cut in July. Will

10:45

it really make a difference? Probably

10:46

not. I actually prefer Nick Te's post

10:50

last week where he was talking about

10:52

these preemptive 50 basis point cuts

10:54

that we were doing back in the dot

10:56

bubble uh and how those ended up being

11:00

essentially designed to support the

11:01

labor market. But the problem was even

11:04

then it was too late. We took these 50

11:06

basis point cuts multiple times in 2021

11:11

uh including twice in intermedating

11:14

cuts. So intermedating cuts are like you

11:16

don't even have a Fed uh meeting and

11:19

they just come out and say, "Oh, by the

11:20

way, we're reducing rates 50 basis

11:22

points." There's a Fed that was really

11:24

starting to panic because of the labor

11:25

market. It's entirely possible that sort

11:28

of activity could happen again where the

11:30

Fed starts trying to preemptively get

11:31

ahead of the Fed easing. The question

11:33

is, will that matter? Once unemployment

11:36

data starts ticking up, that's only when

11:39

markets will really start to care. for

11:41

now markets don't care because well

11:43

labor market is fine as we even saw in

11:45

the PMI report this morning like right

11:48

now things are fine why would you talk

11:50

about recession when you know you're up

11:52

8% on Tesla in the day or 14% on circle

11:55

now does that mean these valuations are

11:57

sustainable in the long term like should

11:59

you know circle that IPOed for you know

12:01

60 to 80 bucks when it opened be trading

12:04

for $274 as a future commodity uh as

12:09

stable coins become somewhat ubiquitous

12:11

amongst not only large banks but small

12:12

banks or corporates like Walmart or uh

12:16

Amazon? No, probably not. But in the

12:19

near term, is it a really great momentum

12:21

play? Hell yeah. So, we'll see. But this

12:24

gives you a little bit of color on

12:25

what's going on with Powell, some of the

12:27

data that came out this morning. Do pay

12:29

attention to PCE later this week. I

12:32

expect it to be relatively benign,

12:34

though I can give you a quick outlook on

12:37

uh what the numbers are supposed to be.

12:40

So market expectations of PCE are month

12:44

overmonth 0.1 year-over-year 2.3 and

12:47

core 0.1. I expect that to hit. So it's

12:50

going to be really, you know, I mean

12:52

kind of nominal. Like this is just not

12:54

going to matter at all. Uh then we'll

12:56

get into July 4th. Uh and we'll get

13:00

Jolts on July 1st. We'll get uh the

13:04

employment report on

13:07

July 3rd. We're only expecting right now

13:10

115 private payrolls. So if we get

13:14

115,000 private payrolls and we get a

13:16

miss on that would be bad. We had

13:19

140,000 the last with some nasty numbers

13:21

for the um uh for the households data.

13:25

So you know what happens? Well July 3rd

13:28

is in a weird way already around the

13:30

corner. It's kind of crazy how fast

13:31

things are going here. Then we have

13:34

let's see we are going to get to initial

13:37

okay FOMC minutes come out July 9th

13:41

don't care CPI no estimates yet CBI

13:44

doesn't come out until July 15th which

13:47

is somewhat late I feel like in the

13:49

cycle uh July 15th but whatever in the

13:52

month PPI comes out July 16th retail

13:55

sales on the 17th and then you have the

13:59

Fed meeting on I want to day. Was it the

14:02

20some?

14:04

Uh here, I'll find out. I think it was

14:06

27, but let me see. Make sure I get that

14:08

right. Uh oh, sorry. July 30th. So, the

14:12

last day of the month is when you'll get

14:14

the actual Fed meeting for uh for the

14:18

Fed July policy decision. Again, right

14:20

now sitting at it's actually just ticked

14:22

up while I was filming this. Uh it's

14:24

almost it's basically 25% now. 25%

14:27

chance of a July cut. So you're seeing

14:28

kind of traders build in that that cut

14:31

uh for July. So very very interesting.

14:34

Powell can print his way out of a

14:36

recession much harder and unpopular to

14:37

tighten during inflation. Um I don't

14:41

know if that's true because remember as

14:43

we said in this video in in 2001

14:47

we were cutting the rate, cutting the

14:48

rate, cutting the rate and we still hit

14:50

a deep recession that lasted two years.

14:52

I mean the stock market was down for two

14:53

and a half years, right? So, it's it's

14:57

they lower the rate first, and they

14:59

really don't turn the money printer on

15:00

until something really collapses and

15:03

breaks. Uh, and and even when you turn

15:06

the money printer on, it's very rare

15:08

that it's overnight. Yes, during COVID,

15:10

it was like a V-shaped recovery

15:12

overnight. But you look at, you know,

15:14

what the what the Fed did in the late

15:16

80s, uh, the 2002 to 2003 pivot, the

15:22

2009 pivot. It took time for that Fed

15:26

pivot to and and the money printing for

15:28

really to flow through into the economy

15:30

because people didn't believe it. People

15:32

believed that oh don't worry this time

15:33

the money printing you know won't

15:35

actually save anything. Things are so

15:37

bad that that sentiment gets so ugly and

15:40

nasty. Uh so this idea that ah the Fed

15:43

will just print and there'll never be a

15:44

recession again I think is is a little

15:46

bit delusional but that's okay. Somebody

15:49

says these times are different. Yeah

15:50

that's what everybody says in a bull

15:52

market.

15:54

Uh so let's see here. Somebody says the

15:57

constant printing our way out of every

15:59

possible recession is why we have

16:01

inflation. Yes, it is. Otherwise, we

16:03

would have deflation. You're right. It

16:05

it keep the the the ponzi of fiat keeps

16:08

the the game going because if we

16:10

constantly had deflation, people

16:12

wouldn't be motivated to spend money. So

16:14

you're actually motivated to spend money

16:16

because of some nominal inflation helps

16:20

sort of inflate away the debt. Yeah.

16:22

It's a giant Ponzi of of course you just

16:25

look at history and and and see how it

16:27

functions and then you understand. So

16:30

yeah, there you have it. So anyway, make

16:33

sure you get the alpha report over at

16:35

mekevin.com if you want to diversify. Uh

16:38

oh, dude, 17% now on Circle. These were

16:41

some sick calls in the Meet Kevin alpha

16:42

report this morning, bro. 9.4% on Tesla.

16:46

Freaking called it. That's awesome.

16:49

Alpha report today killed it. Three

16:51

ways, four ways. Q's circle Tesla calls

16:55

killed it. And then in the course member

16:57

live, somebody asked me about AMD and I

16:59

said the other ones were better options

17:00

today. And it was right, too. Let's go.

17:02

Why not advertise these things that you

17:04

told us here? I feel like nobody else

17:06

knows about this. We'll we'll try a

17:07

little advertising and see how it goes.

17:09

Congratulations, man. You have done so

17:10

much. People love you. People look up to

17:12

you. Kevin Pra there, financial analyst

17:14

and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great

17:16

to get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.