TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Weird Physics Surrounding Black Holes That Will Make You Question Your Existence

1h 22m 24s13,319 words1,997 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:01

black holes are one of the most

0:02

mindboggling aspects of

0:05

space for a start they aren't actually

0:08

objects they are the result of the

0:10

extreme warping of SpaceTime and because

0:13

of this warping some really weird stuff

0:16

starts to go on around them that will

0:18

change your perspective of the way the

0:19

universe operates around

0:21

you some of it is so strange that

0:24

perhaps you won't believe it was true

0:26

were it not for the solid math that back

0:28

up their existence and properties and

0:31

the increasing evidence that the math is

0:32

correct through observations in our own

0:36

Universe I'm Alex molan and you're

0:39

watching asram and in this video we will

0:41

be exploring the unexplorable join me on

0:45

this journey as we attempt to understand

0:47

the Weird Science of how a black hole

0:49

forms what goes on around them and

0:52

explore what might actually allow for an

0:54

escape from the most inescapable prisons

0:57

in existence I hope by the end of this

0:59

video video to have earned your like and

1:08

subscription black holes come in a

1:10

variety of sizes the smallest observed

1:13

black hole is around 3.8 solar

1:16

masses on the other side of the scale we

1:19

find black holes that have been in

1:20

existence since almost the start of the

1:22

universe black holes weighing billions

1:25

of solar masses these bths are not only

1:28

massive but also so huge they would

1:31

easily fit in the entire solar system

1:33

within the diameter of their Event

1:36

Horizon black holes being created today

1:39

are the final stage in the life cycles

1:41

of particularly massive stars when such

1:44

a star is born it is essentially

1:46

balancing under the weight of two forces

1:49

the first is gravity pushing its mass

1:51

towards its Center down in the depths of

1:54

the star hydrogen atoms are crushed

1:56

against other hydrogen atoms with such

1:58

force that they combine to form a denser

2:01

element helium this new atomic structure

2:04

actually needs less energy than it did

2:06

when it was two individual separate

2:09

hydrogen atoms so the extra energy left

2:11

over gets released this released energy

2:14

is the second force it radiates back out

2:17

from the center of the Star as heat and

2:19

light counteracting the force of gravity

2:22

pushing in in this state the star will

2:25

remain relatively stable until such a

2:27

time as the reaction begins to stop as

2:29

it runs out of its hydrogen

2:31

fuel if the star is massive enough once

2:35

the hydrogen begins to run low the star

2:37

will combine the newly formed helium

2:39

into even denser materials like carbon

2:42

neon and eventually oxygen and silicon

2:46

but then it begins fusing iron the issue

2:49

with iron is that it doesn't save any

2:52

energy in its new form so has no spare

2:54

energy to release it just sits in the

2:56

core of the star growing larger with no

3:00

energy pushing Back Against Gravity very

3:03

quickly the scale

3:05

tips the energy of this collapse is

3:08

astounding but the force is dependent on

3:10

the original mass of the star like a

3:13

hammer striking on an anvil the mass of

3:15

the star rushes down to meet the core

3:17

with such force that the rebound of that

3:20

blow is what we call a

3:22

supernova matter and energy are blasted

3:25

out Across the Universe from the

3:26

crackback in one of the largest

3:28

explosions possible which produces

3:30

elements even heavier than iron all the

3:33

way up to

3:34

uranium and what is left with the star

3:37

well it depends if the mass of the star

3:40

and thus the force of the blow was too

3:42

low what remains is a neutron star a

3:45

small ball of matter at most around 25

3:48

km in diameter and yet so densely packed

3:51

with mass that it equals a million

3:53

Earths but if the mass and thus force

3:57

was big enough physics as we know it

3:59

breaks down and we are left with a black

4:03

hole when you see an image of a black

4:05

hole the black sphere you are looking at

4:07

is not actually the black hole itself

4:10

scientists theorize a black hole's true

4:12

form is probably even smaller and denser

4:15

than a neutron star in fact it is likely

4:19

infinitely small and infinitely dense a

4:22

singularity emitting forces that warp

4:24

time and space itself however we don't

4:28

know and the reason we don't know know

4:29

is because of something called The Event

4:32

Horizon all objects with mass exert

4:35

gravity we've known this since the days

4:37

of Newton however when Einstein came

4:40

along in 1915 with his theory of general

4:43

relativity a contemporary of his called

4:45

KL schwat Shield reasoned from it that

4:48

there could exist objects that were so

4:50

massive they could create enough gravity

4:52

that light itself could not escape and

4:55

if even massless light photons couldn't

4:57

get out nothing could

5:00

when you look at a picture of a black

5:01

hole you are not seeing the black hole

5:03

itself you are seeing the Event Horizon

5:06

around it the demarcation line where

5:09

gravity has become so powerful that

5:11

light can no longer leave there is

5:13

nothing but

5:15

Darkness now its effect on space is one

5:18

thing but black holes also impact

5:20

another aspect of the universe time

5:23

itself you see according to Einstein

5:26

space and time are inseparably connected

5:29

and Mass warps

5:31

SpaceTime with the singularity's

5:33

infinite point of mass it stretches

5:36

SpaceTime so much that the event horizon

5:39

also marks the point where time

5:42

stops within the Event Horizon space and

5:45

time basically cease to exist a place

5:48

where there is no where or when this

5:51

produces an interesting phenomenon to an

5:53

outside Observer watching matter fall

5:55

into a black hole from their perspective

5:58

as matter approach approaches the black

6:00

hole it will slow down until just before

6:03

the event horizon where it will stop

6:06

altogether you won't ever see it cross

6:08

the Event Horizon there will be no

6:10

satisfying absorption instead the matter

6:13

will gradually dim until you can't see

6:15

it

6:17

anymore when first theorized astronomers

6:20

and physicists were uncertain if black

6:22

holes were actually real it was only 40

6:25

years later that the first evidence of a

6:27

black hole was

6:28

recorded in 1964 using newly developed

6:32

x-ray satellites scientists noticed an

6:34

object in the constellation signus that

6:37

seemed to be emitting a large amount of

6:39

x-rays strangely enough though

6:41

scientists could not see the object

6:43

itself it surprised them because if it

6:46

was a star it ought to emit visible

6:48

light as well as x-ray radiation

6:51

scientists call this object signis

6:53

X1 in 1970 as telescopes Advanced they

6:58

noticed that whatever signal X1 was it

7:00

had formed a binary orbit with a star in

7:03

its system and this helped scientists

7:05

calculate its mass they discovered that

7:08

this invisible object was 15 times more

7:11

massive than the sun as the densest

7:13

neutron star had an upper limit of three

7:15

times the mass of the Sun scientists

7:17

realized that this was most likely the

7:20

first ever discovered black hole since

7:23

then we have discovered many black holes

7:25

massive ones seem to exist at the center

7:27

of galaxies and we've even man manag to

7:29

take photos of some dark blots against

7:32

the swirling ring of matter that

7:34

surround them and fall into them they're

7:36

accretion

7:37

disc this is how black holes can still

7:40

be detected through x-rays while black

7:43

holes can't emit visible electromagnetic

7:46

radiation themselves the x-rays that

7:48

come from them actually originate from

7:50

the accretion discs where infalling

7:52

matter gets heated to millions of De C

7:55

through intense

7:57

friction black holes with no falling

7:59

matter are basically invisible with no

8:02

bright accretion disc to

8:04

spot exploring black holes is still a

8:07

developing field in physics and there is

8:09

still much to learn from what we have

8:11

learned so far you may wonder if a black

8:14

hole could ever stop being a black hole

8:17

or will it grow Forever Until there is

8:19

no matter or radiation left in the

8:21

universe it would seem

8:24

[Music]

8:26

so however in 1974 in his paper entitled

8:31

black hole explosions physicist Steven

8:33

Hawking postulated that there was

8:35

actually a way that energy and thus Mass

8:38

could leave a black hole but to

8:40

understand why we have to get into some

8:42

extremely weird Theory we need to

8:45

examine some principles of quantum

8:48

mechanics but first let me ask you a

8:51

difficult

8:53

question what is

8:57

nothing imagine for a second a patch of

9:00

space with nothing inside of it it has

9:02

no atoms of space dust not even

9:04

radiation passing through it as near as

9:07

can be seen nothing exists within it and

9:11

yet is there really truly nothing there

9:15

something fundamental exists here and we

9:17

can tell that this is the case when a

9:18

beam of light travels through it if you

9:21

are familiar with the properties of

9:22

light you will know that light is

9:24

actually waves of electrical and

9:26

magnetic charge that are constantly

9:28

propagating with each other forwards in

9:30

a straight line however let's take a

9:32

look at that word wave a wave in the sea

9:36

is the propagation of energy moving

9:37

through the water if you were to look at

9:40

an individual particle of water it's not

9:42

really going anywhere except in a circle

9:45

and yet because it passes energy to the

9:47

atoms next to it energy travels towards

9:50

the shore in a constant motion that goes

9:52

all the way to the beach similarly a

9:54

sound wave moves by passing energy

9:57

between air particles with each particle

9:59

only moving a tiny bit becoming

10:01

energized and then passing that energy

10:03

to the next particle in

10:05

line but in our vacuum of space where

10:08

there is nothing in it where our Photon

10:10

of light is traveling in waves have you

10:12

ever stopped to wonder what exactly is

10:15

waving this hints at a fundamental

10:18

something that exists even in nothing a

10:21

fabric that makes up all of reality

10:24

itself Quantum physicists call this

10:26

something a Quantum field Quant Quantum

10:29

fields are tough to wrap your head

10:31

around but they are inescapably

10:33

important when it comes to understanding

10:35

the fate of a black

10:36

hole so how do Quantum fields and

10:39

exploding black holes tie together going

10:43

back to Hawking's paper Hawking

10:45

hypothesize that black holes would

10:46

release energy slowly over time in

10:48

initially tiny

10:50

quantities as energy and mass were two

10:52

expressions of the same thing according

10:54

to Einstein's famous eal mc² equation

10:58

this inevitably resulted in a reduction

11:00

in the black hole's Mass however as the

11:04

black hole shrinks the rate of energy

11:06

release would speed up getting faster

11:08

and faster until in the very last

11:10

moments of the black hole's life it

11:12

would release a burst of energy that was

11:14

truly gargantuan in its scale before

11:17

Vanishing

11:19

entirely but how can this be true it is

11:22

well known that an event horizon is

11:25

inescapable so how could radiation ever

11:27

leave it and eventually cause such a

11:29

black hole

11:30

explosion the answer is a strange one

11:33

and relies on unintuitive ideas of

11:36

quantum theory that completely go

11:38

against our day-to-day experience but if

11:41

it's true I hope you're prepared for the

11:43

universe to be a whole lot Stranger Than

11:45

You first

11:49

thought but to begin understanding

11:51

Hawkings Theory we need to understand

11:53

the idea of quantum

11:55

Fields remember light moves like a wave

11:58

through even a completely empty patch of

12:00

space which reveals that there must be

12:03

something existing even in the nothing

12:06

or else light wouldn't be able to wave

12:08

it scientists call this fundamental

12:11

fabric of reality a Quantum field in

12:14

fact they believe that there are several

12:16

Quantum Fields all overlapping each

12:18

other and all covering every single

12:21

patch of the universe be it past present

12:24

or future Quantum field defines a

12:27

particular type of something one field

12:30

might Define all of the electrons in

12:32

existence while another May Define

12:34

quarks that make up an atom where

12:37

nothing can be found the quantum field

12:39

is relatively quiet think of it like a

12:42

guitar string that hasn't been strummed

12:44

or a graph that has a zero

12:46

value but wherever in time and space

12:49

mass or energy can be found the quantum

12:52

field is resonating at that point and

12:54

when the resonance reaches a certain

12:56

threshold or quantity the universe

12:58

Express expresses that as say an

13:01

electron or a photon it's important to

13:03

note that in this Theory the resonance

13:05

is not just reacting to a piece of

13:07

matter it is the matter an electron is

13:11

nothing more than a resonating section

13:13

of the quantum field that defines

13:15

electrons this is true for all energy

13:18

and all matter too according to Einstein

13:21

energy and matter are two sides of the

13:23

same coin after all all the universe you

13:27

see around you is resonating quantum

13:29

fields and nothing more in this way the

13:32

theory portrays all of the universe as a

13:35

song being played on these fields which

13:37

I think is quite a beautiful image if

13:39

nothing else but why does this matter

13:42

why is it important to define the

13:44

universe in this way well due to an idea

13:47

of quantum physics called Heisenberg's

13:50

uncertainty principle sometimes the

13:52

strings of the universe start strumming

13:54

themselves without going too deeply into

13:57

this aspect of quantum physics

13:59

essentially when we're looking at really

14:01

tiny objects on the atomic scale it

14:04

becomes impossible to know too much

14:05

about them you cannot know both the

14:08

location and the direction of travel of

14:10

an electron for instance because it is

14:12

so small as soon as you try to figure

14:15

out the location of an electron it

14:17

bounces off whatever you are trying to

14:18

use to measure it so you can no longer

14:20

be sure of its direction of travel if

14:23

you know its direction according to this

14:25

principle you can't know its location

14:28

this is not just just because our

14:29

methods of measuring aren't good enough

14:32

but because of some fundamental laws

14:34

about the nature of the universe itself

14:36

according to Heisenberg's uncertainty

14:38

principle you cannot know everything

14:40

about particles on a subatomic level but

14:43

when you apply this principle to Quantum

14:45

Fields it gets weird Quantum Fields

14:48

fluctuate everywhere and by Heisenberg's

14:51

uncertainty principle particle and

14:53

antiparticle pairs can actually pop in

14:56

and out of existence the how and why why

14:59

get complicated but basically the

15:01

universe allows it as long as they only

15:04

exist for a very short period of time as

15:07

ruled by uncertainty

15:08

relations you might think this can't

15:11

possibly be a thing mattera does not

15:13

just pop into existence we would have

15:15

surely noticed this by now however in an

15:19

experiment done by hendrik Casmir

15:21

evidence was found that suggest that

15:23

this might actually happen kasmia took

15:26

two plates of conductive metal and

15:28

placed them close enough together so

15:29

that only certain sizes of smaller

15:31

virtual particles could pop into

15:33

existence between them this limited the

15:36

number of such particles that could pop

15:37

into existence but because all types of

15:40

particles could pop into existence on

15:42

the outside of the plates this meant

15:45

that there was a difference in pressure

15:46

exerted on the two sides of each plate

15:49

theoretically the larger pressure by the

15:51

number of virtual particles on the

15:52

outside of the plate should push the two

15:55

plates together and in the test this

15:57

proved to be the case

15:59

you might think that particles appearing

16:01

out of nowhere seems to defy the laws of

16:04

conservation of matter you would be

16:06

right so to balance the scales whenever

16:09

a virtual particle appears a second

16:12

particle also pops into existence to

16:14

pair up with the first particle but

16:16

while one of the particles is matter the

16:19

other is antimatter a one and a minus

16:22

one on our bar chart thus keeping things

16:25

overall at zero the universe is happy

16:28

and on top of that these fluctuations in

16:31

the quantum field quickly crash into

16:33

each other and annihilate each other

16:34

removing them both from existence again

16:37

so we don't normally have to worry about

16:38

them as a side note there is a theory

16:41

that antimatter is simply matter that is

16:44

moving in the opposite direction through

16:46

time but that's a level of weirdness

16:48

that we don't need to get into

16:50

here the important part is that the

16:52

quantum fields are constantly resonating

16:55

and constantly canceling each other out

16:58

this is why for for the most part empty

17:00

space is

17:01

empty however what would happen if you

17:04

stopped only some of those fields

17:06

resonating and that's where black holes

17:09

come in black holes act a bit like

17:11

putting your thumb on the guitar string

17:13

of the universe due to their event

17:15

Horizons certain resonances in the

17:17

quantum fields are dampened down while

17:20

others are not Hawking imagine sketching

17:23

a line through time in a patch of space

17:26

where a black hole was born he imagined

17:28

a Quantum field that resonated along

17:30

this line stretching from before the

17:32

existence of the black hole into the

17:34

future after it before the birth of a

17:37

black hole all is normal Quantum fields

17:40

are all resonating freely and can cancel

17:42

each other out however the emergence of

17:45

the black hole's Event Horizon changed

17:47

the curvature of space and outside it

17:50

Hawking realized that certain pulses

17:52

were now missing their opposite numbers

17:55

as he looked at the math he realized not

17:57

everything was being canceled out

17:59

anymore after the black hole had formed

18:01

indeed outside the Event Horizon

18:04

traveling away from the black hole he

18:06

found resonances that perfectly match

18:08

the shape of thermal radiation flying

18:10

away into

18:12

space radiation is energy and energy

18:16

cannot form from nothing as the black

18:19

hole was creating this radiation the

18:21

black hole would have to pay the price

18:23

every piece of Hawking radiation would

18:25

thus coincide with an equal amount of

18:27

energy lost from the black hole which in

18:30

time would reduce it down to nothing if

18:33

it exists Hawking radiation is kind of

18:35

like money spontaneously appearing

18:37

outside of a bank while inside the bank

18:40

the money in the vault

18:42

vanishes it's also extremely difficult

18:44

to prove as Hawking predicted this

18:46

radiation would be colder than the

18:48

background Cosmic radiation that fills

18:50

the

18:51

universe and would have a wavelength as

18:53

long as the black holes Event Horizon

18:56

itself as some black holes have event

18:58

hor Horizons the size of solar systems

19:01

we have no way of detecting this kind of

19:03

radiation we'd only really see it once

19:06

the universe had gone cold and dead so

19:08

there was nothing else to get in the way

19:10

which would probably mean we weren't

19:12

around anymore to do the

19:14

detecting however in spite of the

19:16

objections to it the math behind Hawking

19:19

radiation seems to be sound and

19:21

scientists have recently taken steps to

19:24

proving it in the lab in the techan

19:26

Israel Institute of Technology

19:28

researchers looking into Hawking

19:30

radiation came up with an idea to get

19:32

around the difficulty of measuring a

19:34

real life black hole they did this by

19:37

creating an analog a Sonic black hole

19:40

which would mimic the properties of a

19:41

real one they relied on the fact that

19:44

sound moves much slower than light so

19:47

it's much easier to create a medium that

19:49

moves faster than sound when it moves

19:52

any sound waves traveling in the same

19:54

direction as it can never quite Escape

19:56

it interestingly HW math worked for

19:59

these Sonic black holes just as well as

20:01

it did for Gravity based ones and so

20:03

Hawking radiation ought to be detected

20:06

from it after repeating the experiment

20:09

97,000 times over 124 days of continuous

20:13

experimentation the researchers detected

20:16

multiple instances of Hawking radiation

20:19

and saw that it matched Hawking's

20:20

predictions of how his radiation might

20:22

behave although this does not prove that

20:25

Hawking radiation is definitely real for

20:27

actual black holes 2 the fact that

20:29

Hawking's math worked for this Sonic

20:31

analog is a strong implication that he

20:33

might be onto something Hawking

20:35

radiation might just be

20:38

real so if you fell into a black hole

20:41

could you ever escape probably not

20:44

however if you waited until almost the

20:46

end of the universe the black hole may

20:49

just radiate Hawking radiation until the

20:51

mass and energy that made up your

20:53

existence was completely removed from

20:55

inside the Event Horizon does that count

20:58

count as

20:59

escaping that's probably not so

21:02

appealing to you probably best just not

21:04

to go in and that's not the only weird

21:07

thing about black holes their existence

21:09

implies something quite worrying about

21:12

our own

21:14

reality when you're walking on a beach

21:16

and you make a footprint in the sand

21:18

there is no question in your mind that

21:20

it is your foot that caused the

21:22

footprint the order of causality is

21:25

quite clear here so much so that it

21:27

seems laughable to even need to assert

21:29

it you made the footprint the footprint

21:32

didn't make you but what if it did what

21:36

if I told you that on the cosmological

21:38

scale the fundamental relationship

21:40

between foot and footprint might be a

21:43

little more blurred than you would

21:45

intuitively think and shockingly due to

21:48

the nature of black holes and Hawking

21:51

radiation there is some evidence that

21:53

this might just be the

21:56

case but to begin with we're going to

21:59

need to look at a principle called

22:01

relativity but no not that relativity

22:05

Galilean

22:06

relativity first described by Galileo

22:09

galile in 1632 the idea of this form of

22:13

Relativity is that there is no

22:15

difference between being completely

22:17

still and moving at continuous speed

22:20

imagine there are two rooms one on a

22:22

ship and another on land both are

22:25

soundproof and have no windows imagine

22:28

the sea is is calm so there's no rocking

22:30

at all the only difference between the

22:32

two rooms is that one is moving and the

22:34

other is not can you tell the difference

22:37

between the two from the

22:40

inside you might think that you'd be

22:42

able to sense movement but this is not

22:45

the case for instance right now you are

22:47

careening through space at 110,000 kmph

22:52

due to the Earth's movement around the

22:53

Sun and if you are sitting down at home

22:56

while watching it it's likely you would

22:58

have said you weren't moving at

23:01

all in fact Galileo realized that there

23:04

was no test that could be done to tell

23:06

the difference between the two

23:08

scenarios he even found that if you

23:10

dropped a ball in the ship from your

23:12

perspective it would look like it fell

23:13

straight down even if from the

23:16

perspective of a person on land it would

23:18

look like it was falling

23:20

diagonally Galileo realized that if you

23:23

remove all frames of reference Say by

23:26

being in space there is no way of

23:28

telling if a planet is moving towards

23:30

you or you are moving towards a planet

23:33

according to relativity both are equally

23:36

valid

23:37

interpretations you might have noticed

23:39

this yourself if you ever looked out of

23:41

the window on a train just as another

23:43

train suddenly passed by quickly

23:45

overtaking you although both trains are

23:47

going forwards the other train is going

23:49

faster than yours and because you no

23:51

longer have a frame of reference to

23:53

compare your motion to it might look as

23:56

if you are suddenly going backwards

23:59

Einstein took this idea further with his

24:01

equivalence principle here he took the

24:03

idea of two rooms again but this time he

24:06

was making an observation about

24:08

gravity if you were inside a windowless

24:11

room floating in the vacuum of space and

24:13

someone started accelerating your room

24:15

in the up Direction Say by strapping a

24:18

rocket to the bottom of it if the rocket

24:21

accelerated at just the right speed then

24:23

it would feel identical to if you were

24:25

standing in a room on the surface of

24:27

Earth

24:28

in other words there is no way to tell

24:31

the difference between the acceleration

24:33

caused by gravity and the acceleration

24:35

caused by a rocket assuming you couldn't

24:37

stop the rocket shaking you with all its

24:39

rumbling of

24:41

course both these principles rely on the

24:44

idea of inertia that objects do not like

24:47

to move if simply left on their own and

24:50

do not like to stop moving once they

24:51

have started anytime you want a mass to

24:54

do something different to what it is

24:56

doing a new Force must be applied

24:59

otherwise it will remain

25:01

inert but why would it feel to the man

25:03

in the room with the rocket as if he

25:05

were under the effects of gravity or

25:07

perhaps a better question why would it

25:10

feel to us on Earth as if we were being

25:12

accelerated upwards by the effects of a

25:15

rocket the Earth is not expanding in all

25:18

directions at once pushing us with it

25:21

surely while this is true Einstein

25:24

realized that the two felt similar

25:26

because they both were the same thing a

25:29

form of

25:31

acceleration however there is another

25:33

form of acceleration that better

25:35

explains how gravity Works than simply

25:37

applying a force to an object to push it

25:39

like a rocket does consider this

25:42

spinning Fair Ground ride if you have

25:44

ever been on such a ride you will know

25:46

the power of changing direction as a

25:48

form of acceleration when you stand

25:51

against the wall of the ride once it

25:52

gets up to speed you feel a constant

25:54

force pressing you against the wall even

25:57

when the ride spins at a constant speed

26:00

this is because your mass is trying to

26:01

move in a straight line at each point in

26:04

the ride but the curvature of the ride

26:06

is forcing you to alter your direction

26:08

the battle between your inertia trying

26:11

not to change what you're doing and the

26:13

wall trying to alter your direction of

26:14

travel manifest as the force you feel

26:18

and as far as acceleration is concerned

26:20

there's not much difference between the

26:22

earth beneath you accelerating you up

26:24

and you trying to accelerate down

26:27

Einstein realized that this form of

26:29

accelerating acceleration caused by a

26:31

curving path was the best explanation

26:34

for

26:35

Gravity he came up with a theory that

26:37

matter and energy cause a warping in the

26:40

space around it kind of like how a ball

26:42

might bend the surface of a Tor rubber

26:44

sheet it was placed on the larger the

26:47

mass the greater the curvature and once

26:51

space was curved any object trying to

26:53

travel through it would be deflected by

26:55

that curve in the words of physic phist

26:58

John Wheeler space tells matter how to

27:01

move matter tells space how to curve for

27:05

small masses this curve in space would

27:08

be very slight but in dense masses this

27:11

curvature could get so great that it

27:13

would be impossible for an object that

27:15

got too close to it to escape it these

27:18

are the conditions we find near a black

27:20

hole with its a vent

27:22

Horizon so going back to our very first

27:25

analogy of the footprint and the foot if

27:28

a black hole is the foot the curvature

27:30

of space around it is the footprint it's

27:33

interesting to see all of this in action

27:35

and to understand how Einstein came to

27:37

conclusions which would have been almost

27:39

universally validated by scientists even

27:41

a 100 years on but there's nothing

27:44

particularly weird about any of this so

27:46

far understanding the exact mechanisms

27:48

behind it doesn't make it any

27:50

stranger the black hole tells space how

27:53

to curve and once curved any object

27:55

moving near it is told how to move

27:58

nothing here is outside our expectations

28:00

based on day-to-day

28:02

observations but when we start to look

28:04

at Hawking radiation something very

28:06

strange happens the most important thing

28:09

to bear in mind about it for the

28:11

purposes of our current video is that it

28:13

is

28:14

nonlocal this means that it does not

28:17

appear from the black hole itself but

28:19

appears from the area of space around it

28:22

to be clear I do not mean Beyond The

28:25

Singularity of the black hole but still

28:27

within the black sphere here that's hard

28:29

to Define anyway space as we know it

28:31

doesn't exist there remember the black

28:34

ball you see here is simply the

28:37

demarcation point between inescapable

28:39

curvature and escapable curvature The

28:42

Event Horizon I do not even mean right

28:45

up against the Event Horizon although

28:47

that is sometimes how this theory is

28:49

portrayed people sometimes speak of two

28:52

particles popping into existence right

28:54

up against the Event Horizon with the

28:56

antimatter particle just inside it so it

28:59

falls in while the normal particle is

29:01

just outside and so escapes this is not

29:04

what is

29:05

happening instead the region of space

29:08

this radiation can pop into existence is

29:11

several times the size of the Event

29:13

Horizon a distance up to billions of

29:15

kilometers away and when the largest

29:18

black holes we have can comfortably fit

29:20

multiple solar systems side by side

29:23

inside of their Event Horizon the idea

29:25

that a photon of radiation can pop into

29:28

to existence this distance again outside

29:31

the Event Horizon is crazy it happens

29:34

even in a place where there is literally

29:36

nothing there so in short it is not so

29:40

much that Hawking radiation is coming

29:41

from the black hole directly instead it

29:44

is coming into existence from the

29:46

curvature of space that the black hole

29:48

is creating and can happen quite far

29:51

away from the black hole

29:52

itself but if that is true then things

29:56

work completely opposite to what we

29:58

might expect as you will see in a moment

30:01

consider what happens in this order as

30:04

energy leaves the curvature of space the

30:07

curvature lessens because of something

30:09

known as the conservation of energy and

30:12

as this reduction of curvature happens

30:14

the black hole then shrinks this is

30:17

crazy this is like the footprint getting

30:20

smaller and so the foot shrinks

30:22

accordingly it feels very wrong things

30:25

can't possibly work that way and yet I

30:27

Einstein hinted that such a thing might

30:30

indeed be

30:31

possible in one of his equations he

30:34

stated that the curvature of SpaceTime

30:36

was proportional to the mass energy of

30:38

an object but proportional is not

30:41

causational there's no presupposition

30:44

that one causes the other in this

30:46

relationship we are comfortable with the

30:48

idea of changing Mass and so changing

30:51

curvature but it works just as well if

30:53

you go the other way and change the

30:55

curvature to change the mass if this is

30:58

true then it hints at a universe where

31:01

mass is simply a projection caused by

31:03

space

31:04

curvature when you shine a light at an

31:06

object say your hand and it makes a

31:08

shadow on the wall the shadow is a

31:10

projection caused by the existence of

31:12

your hand interacting with the light

31:15

normally in this analogy you might be

31:16

forgiven for believing that we are the

31:18

hand it is our mass that creates the

31:21

curvature of space around us and yet do

31:24

we really know that it doesn't work the

31:26

other way around are we simply

31:28

projections Shadows on the wall of the

31:30

universe being brought into Life by

31:33

something more fundamental going on in

31:35

the curvature of SpaceTime and yet we're

31:38

going around thinking that we are the

31:40

thing that's real we don't really know

31:43

given that all you know is the reality

31:45

you experience it would be difficult for

31:48

you to be able to tell the difference

31:50

between the two

31:51

scenarios but if relativity has taught

31:53

us anything it's that if there's no way

31:56

of telling the difference between the

31:58

two situations then we can't completely

32:00

dismiss that we're in one and not the

32:03

other either that or the two might be

32:06

more linked than we

32:10

thought of course obviously this is all

32:13

just a theory there is no hard proof

32:15

that Hawking radiation is even a real

32:18

thing although there have been some

32:20

experiments that hint that it might be

32:22

but this is just something interesting

32:24

to think about and even if it does prove

32:27

to be the case that reality is a

32:28

projection it's not going to affect your

32:31

day very much you will still think and

32:33

feel and that's more than enough reason

32:35

for you to go about doing what you're

32:37

currently doing but it is an example of

32:40

how when we start to examine the very

32:42

fundamental building blocks of Reality

32:45

by exploring the weird warping effects

32:47

of black holes it can cause us to

32:49

challenge assumptions about our very

32:51

nature after all when you're asking the

32:54

question am I real and the answer is

32:57

it's not certain that's more than a

33:00

little

33:01

concerning either way black holes affect

33:04

our reality and they affect our universe

33:08

and not just because they suck

33:09

everything within their reach into them

33:11

and give nothing back they are the end

33:14

the final destruction of the universe

33:17

and yet what if I said to you that they

33:19

might actually prove to be our

33:21

Salvation black holes might provide the

33:24

answer to traveling faster than the

33:25

speed of light and solving the energ

33:28

crisis in ways we couldn't have even

33:30

imagined until

33:32

recently and as by now I have come to

33:35

expect they do so by messing with the

33:38

fabric of reality itself and by

33:40

completely countering my expectations of

33:42

physics perhaps we have been thinking

33:45

about black holes all

33:47

wrong but to understand how a black hole

33:50

ignores the usual limitations on faster

33:52

than light travel and does so in a way

33:54

that you can benefit from it without

33:56

having to go inside a black holes Event

33:58

Horizon and how it produces near

34:01

Limitless energy at the same time then

34:04

we are going to have to understand more

34:06

about the features of black holes than

34:07

we've covered so far it's actually quite

34:11

difficult to say much about the black

34:12

holes features at all precisely because

34:15

of the Event Horizon we cannot see what

34:17

the inside of a black hole looks like in

34:20

fact there are only three things we can

34:22

say about black holes with any degree of

34:24

certainty they have mass they have

34:27

charge and they have angular

34:30

momentum you might wonder how we know

34:33

these things about black holes given

34:34

that no light can leave them to tell us

34:36

about them the key to these three

34:39

characteristics is that all three of

34:41

them represent aspects of the black hole

34:43

that can be felt outside the black holes

34:45

of end Horizon charge for instance works

34:49

the same way around a black hole as it

34:51

does around any other charged object

34:53

that is to say if a black hole is

34:55

charged then it will attract objects

34:57

that have different charge to it and

34:59

repel objects that share its charge

35:02

think of it like a giant magnet pushing

35:04

and pulling on the universe around it

35:07

scientists can track objects that

35:09

approach a black hole and by seeing how

35:11

quickly certain objects known to have a

35:13

charge move towards it scientists can

35:16

predict the charge of the black hole

35:18

itself interplaying with this is

35:21

mass the mass of a black hole can also

35:24

be felt outside the sphere of the Event

35:26

Horizon in fact it is the main creator

35:29

of the Event Horizon in the first place

35:32

this is because Mass creates gravity and

35:34

does so in a linear fashion in

35:36

accordance with the same principles you

35:38

might find in gau's law a theorem about

35:42

electromagnetism albe it with a

35:44

gravitational

35:45

analog so it's possible too to calculate

35:48

the mass of an object by seeing how far

35:51

away objects are before they start to

35:53

accelerate towards it and how quickly

35:55

they accelerate although obviously you

35:58

need to factor in charge at the same

35:59

time or your results might get

36:02

skewed finally angular momentum or spin

36:07

it is possible to detect the spin of a

36:09

large mass object and we are going to

36:11

dive into the how in just a bit for now

36:14

let's just accept it as a given and

36:16

recognize that black holes are certainly

36:19

very high mass

36:21

objects there are varying sizes of black

36:23

holes in existence the smallest known as

36:26

micro black hes have a mass that's

36:29

comparable to that of our moon or 7.35 *

36:33

10^ 22

36:35

kg they fit all this into a space that's

36:39

just 0.2 mm in diameter which is

36:44

incredible it really gives you a sense

36:46

of how dense a black hole can be

36:49

something thinner in size than a human

36:51

hair packing the mass of the Moon and

36:54

that's just the smallest ones Stellar

36:57

black hole hes have a mass equal to 10

36:59

times our sun and have a diameter equal

37:02

to 60 km intermediate black holes are

37:05

the mass of 1,000 Suns and fit all of

37:09

that into a diameter of 2,000 km which

37:12

is still much smaller than the earth it

37:15

is the largest black holes that really

37:17

dwarf us with masses between 100,000 to

37:21

10 billion times the mass of the Sun and

37:24

sizes ranging from 0.001 1 to 400

37:29

astronomical units an astronomical unit

37:32

being the distance from the Earth to the

37:35

Sun but other than those three features

37:38

there are in theory no other differences

37:40

between them if you put two black holes

37:43

in the same room and made sure they had

37:45

the same mass charge and spin it would

37:47

be impossible to tell them

37:50

apart however these three features are

37:53

enough to have some interesting effects

37:55

on the area of space outside of black

37:58

hole traveling inside a black hole is

38:01

impossible space and time break down

38:03

past the Event Horizon but we think we

38:05

know a few things that must exist inside

38:08

one beating in the heart of a black hole

38:11

there is thought to lie the

38:13

singularity in truth this actually is

38:16

the black hole when we were discussing

38:19

diameters earlier that is just the

38:21

diameter of the Event Horizon again we

38:24

are not certain what the black hole

38:26

actually looks like because light can

38:27

never Escape it in a space that is

38:30

infinitely small there is a point where

38:33

all the mass of the black hole is packed

38:35

so that it is infinitely dense for the

38:38

simplest models of black holes the ones

38:41

that do not spin this is a single point

38:44

in a rotating black hole this is more

38:46

like a little spinning ring otherwise it

38:49

would be difficult to Define spin for a

38:51

point that has no

38:53

volume our current physics get very

38:55

strange around such a black hole

38:58

if ideal paths are traveled around this

39:00

point it becomes mathematically possible

39:02

to do some very strange things like meet

39:05

up with your own past this has some

39:08

disturbing implications for causality

39:10

and gets into time travel paradoxes like

39:13

the grandfather Paradox so that probably

39:16

only shows for certain that our ideas

39:18

about singularities are not quite right

39:21

yet because the singularity is so small

39:24

it'll take the successful merging of

39:26

quantum theory and general relativity

39:28

Theory to properly explain what is going

39:30

on inside a black hole and we have not

39:32

yet managed to do this it may one day

39:35

turn out that singularities do not exist

39:37

in the hearts of black holes at all but

39:39

this is the extent of our knowledge so

39:42

far well whatever it is that lies inside

39:44

a black hole it Powers our faster than

39:47

light engine because like most objects

39:50

in the universe it spins and oh does it

39:53

spin as we travel out from the center of

39:56

the black hole we passed through the

39:58

Event Horizon with a little Fanfare The

40:00

Event Horizon actually cannot be

40:02

detected locally although a person

40:04

outside the black hole might watch you

40:06

slow down to a complete stop as you

40:08

travel through it from your perspective

40:10

it actually might seem like time is

40:12

Flowing normally normally that is until

40:15

the universe outside the black hole runs

40:17

its course in an instant because time

40:20

outside the black hole is traveling so

40:22

fast compared to you this is the essence

40:25

of relativity

40:27

in fact the only evidence you might have

40:30

that you passed the Event Horizon at all

40:32

is because of something that exists just

40:34

outside it the photon

40:37

sphere in a Zone just outside the Event

40:40

Horizon there exists a point in space

40:42

where if a photon enters it at just the

40:45

right angle it will enter a perfect

40:47

orbit around the black hole in much the

40:50

same way the moon perfectly orbits the

40:52

earth this infinitesimally thin zone is

40:55

known as the photon sphere and given the

40:58

number of photons that have flown past

41:00

black holes in all the millions of years

41:02

they have existed it is probably filled

41:04

with photons it is quite possible that

41:07

you would be instantly fried as you pass

41:10

through this

41:11

point however it is just outside here

41:14

that we find the zone that interests us

41:17

the erosphere

41:18

this is the Zone around a black hole

41:21

where we can most easily detect its Spin

41:23

and this is because in this Zone it is

41:26

impossible for us not to move you see

41:30

Mass affects space we see this in the

41:32

curving effect of gravity on the Travel

41:35

of objects through that region of space

41:38

however it might be more accurate to say

41:40

that mass drags on the space around it

41:44

as it moves through space it brings a

41:46

little bit of that space along with it

41:48

for the ride and when an object is

41:50

massive as a black hole spins there is

41:53

an effect known as frame dragging to put

41:56

it simp simply reality around the black

41:59

hole begins to spin in a Whirlpool that

42:02

cannot be fought against much like a

42:05

real whirpool anything caught within the

42:07

ergosphere is spun around the black hole

42:10

because the frame of reference it sits

42:12

in is being

42:14

pulled sort of like how a person moves

42:17

because they are standing on a moving

42:19

walkway the greater the spin of the

42:22

massive object the faster this happens

42:25

and in the erosphere this can Ur at a

42:27

speed so fast that by The Event Horizon

42:31

space is moving faster than the speed of

42:33

light you would need to travel faster

42:35

than the speed of light in the opposite

42:37

direction just to stay at a relative

42:40

standstill from the point of view of the

42:41

outside Observer which of course you

42:44

cannot

42:45

do but isn't this against the laws of

42:48

physics doesn't Einstein say that

42:50

nothing can travel faster than the speed

42:52

of light the answer to that is yes but

42:56

black holes have found an interesting

42:58

loophole you see this rule only applies

43:01

locally right where you are in your

43:04

frame of reference nothing can go faster

43:06

than the speed of light but thanks to

43:08

relativity it is possible for frames of

43:12

reference to move away from each other

43:14

so fast that objects in them appear to

43:16

be breaking this light barrier from your

43:18

point of

43:19

view but if you moov next to them and

43:22

enter their frame of reference they

43:24

would seem to slow down and would start

43:26

obeying the laws of the physics again

43:29

it's a really weird effect but frame

43:31

dragging is an actual thing it is by

43:34

measuring frame dragging that scientists

43:36

can learn the spin of a black

43:38

hole however according to a man called

43:41

Roger Penrose there may even be a way of

43:44

exploiting it if you were to send a

43:47

rocket into this section of the

43:48

erosphere the rocket would speed up due

43:51

to being caught in the whirlpool of

43:52

reality once it had gained enough speed

43:55

it could then fire a propellant in such

43:57

a direction that it pushed itself out of

43:59

the whirpool again but now traveling at

44:01

a much faster speed this method named

44:05

the Penrose process could hypothetically

44:08

net you energy equal to about 20% of the

44:11

mass of your rocket now that might not

44:14

sound like much but remember according

44:16

to Einstein's eal mc² your 20% Mass

44:20

would produce energy equal to itself

44:22

Times by 299,792,458

44:27

458 squared that's a lot of

44:31

energy so to harness this colossal

44:34

kinetic energy all you would need to do

44:37

is travel to the nearest black hole

44:38

which is roughly 3,000 light years from

44:40

us and enter its erosphere with a rocket

44:43

capable of surviving the intense

44:45

gravitational forces there ideally you

44:48

would need to find one that was not

44:49

surrounded by an accretion disc because

44:51

those get up to temperatures of millions

44:53

of degrees as they are swung around at

44:55

near light speeds and melt from solids

44:58

down to gas and plasma but you get the

45:01

idea

45:02

easy okay maybe this is a little

45:05

impractical for us but the implications

45:08

for faster than light travel that black

45:10

holes demonstrate through frame dragging

45:12

might just offer us the key to one day

45:15

beat the light barrier for real not by

45:17

going faster than light ourselves but by

45:20

somehow convincing the frame of

45:22

reference we are in to travel at those

45:24

faster speeds just like they do around a

45:27

black

45:28

hole of course if this requires the

45:30

energy of a black hole to accomplish we

45:33

might be out of luck for now but it's an

45:35

incredible glimpse into what is possible

45:38

and scientists are already looking into

45:40

the power of frame dragging for Future

45:42

travel but maybe that's a topic for

45:44

another

45:45

video either way this all just

45:48

highlights once again how our universe

45:50

really is very different from what we

45:52

might have ever

45:54

imagined and here's another surprise

45:57

thing about black holes you may not have

45:59

known

46:00

before falling into a black hole is a

46:03

lot harder than it sounds you might

46:06

expect it to be relatively easy after

46:09

all and's the ultimate absorbers quite

46:12

literally the largest sources of gravity

46:14

out there shouldn't it be easier to fall

46:17

into them than any other thing in the

46:19

universe you might have thought so but

46:22

paradoxically your intuition is wrong

46:25

these Galactic moos are one of the

46:27

hardest places in the universe to

46:29

actually get inside so much so that

46:32

during his lifetime Einstein believed

46:35

you couldn't get inside them at all and

46:37

not only that but black holes might even

46:40

eject you away from them at speeds close

46:43

to the speed of light shouldn't it be

46:46

that these objects would be incredibly

46:48

easy to get into like a slide that gets

46:51

steeper and steeper the further along it

46:53

you go you might expect to speed up more

46:56

and more the closer you get to the black

46:58

hole

46:58

center however while this is right it is

47:02

also wrong you do speed up so much so

47:05

that your speed will begin to approach

47:07

the speed of light however in almost all

47:11

circumstances you will not find yourself

47:13

approaching the center of the black hole

47:16

and this isn't me talking about some

47:18

strange Quirk of time or relativity but

47:21

something that will be observable from

47:23

whatever frame of reference you're

47:24

watching from confused

47:27

don't worry allow me to explain through

47:29

the real world example of something

47:31

called an accretion

47:33

disc black holes are at their very heart

47:36

very simple in something known as the no

47:39

hair theorem black holes are said to be

47:42

devoid of almost any feature just like a

47:44

head with well nothing on it the

47:48

features of a black hole are usually

47:50

fairly plain too they have charge mass

47:53

and spin and that's about it as such a

47:56

cian discs are not actually a necessary

47:59

part of black holes black holes can

48:02

exist just fine without them sitting

48:04

there dark and unobservable in space

48:08

however when Mass such as an unlucky

48:10

star Strays too close to the black

48:13

hole's gravitational pull it can be torn

48:15

apart by the vast forces at work and

48:18

sucked towards the black hole center

48:21

strangely enough though this matter does

48:23

not all immediately fall into the black

48:25

holes of end Horizon instead the matter

48:28

usually coalesces into a sort of flat

48:30

ring that orbits around the black hole

48:32

outside the Event

48:34

Horizon while eventually it does all

48:37

enter this process can take a long time

48:40

some accretion discs take 100 to 1,000

48:44

million years to be completely absorbed

48:47

so what is going on here why does the

48:50

matter not simply enter the black hole

48:53

the answer is that it comes up against a

48:55

surprising principle of physics known as

48:57

the conservation of

48:59

momentum first described by

49:01

mathematician John Wallace in 1670 and

49:04

then pioneered by his contemporary

49:06

Newton a decade or so later the idea

49:09

goes like this if you have a group of

49:12

objects the motion of those objects AKA

49:15

their momentum collectively must always

49:18

remain the same if one particle with

49:21

momentum bumps into a particle that is

49:23

standing still and both bounce away from

49:25

each other the amount amount of total

49:27

motion for the two particles must equal

49:29

the amount of the first particle on its

49:31

own no momentum can be

49:34

lost if you have a rocket on a Launchpad

49:37

with zero momentum it can only give

49:39

itself momentum by firing a propellant

49:42

in the opposite direction once you add

49:44

up the amount of momentum imparted to

49:46

the air by the propellant going down and

49:49

the amount of momentum given to the

49:50

rocket by going up then the upward

49:53

momentum and the downward momentum are

49:55

equal resulting in the same Net Zero

49:58

momentum you had to start with this

50:01

Falls a little outside our

50:03

expectations after all we as humans

50:05

often stop and start walking around

50:08

seemingly without obeying this law

50:11

however if you evaluate all the

50:13

particles involved this law is always

50:15

kept you would struggle to move anywhere

50:18

without a floor to push against momentum

50:21

imparted to the floor must equal the

50:23

amount of momentum imparted to you but

50:25

in the opposite direction

50:27

you just don't notice it because the

50:29

floor is so much bigger than you the

50:31

amount of momentum you give to it does

50:33

not move it in any noticable way but

50:36

what has this got to do with falling

50:38

into a black hole well consider this

50:41

next example this time to do with

50:43

angular

50:44

momentum imagine a ballerina who has

50:47

their arms outstretched and is spinning

50:50

on a single point the particles in their

50:52

hands have momentum they are moving a

50:55

certain distance in a certain certain

50:56

amount of

50:58

time however when they tuck their arms

51:01

close to their body what happens well

51:04

they suddenly start spinning much faster

51:07

this is a classic example of momentum

51:10

trying to be conserved you see the

51:12

momentum in the hands is still trying to

51:14

travel at the same speed it was

51:16

previously traveling at however suddenly

51:18

because it's close to the body it's now

51:21

traveling a much smaller distance but is

51:23

doing so at the same speed effectively

51:26

it has much much less distance to travel

51:27

to complete one revolution and as a

51:30

result completes that Revolution much

51:32

faster this causes the ballerina to spin

51:35

faster when they tuck their hands in and

51:37

slower when they stretch their hands out

51:40

now imagine this on a cosmic

51:42

scale in most scenarios matter does not

51:45

fall in a perfectly straight line

51:47

towards a black hole almost always it

51:50

will miss it slightly and will start

51:51

spiraling in towards its Center as it's

51:54

caught in the black hole's gravity it

51:56

now has angular

51:58

momentum as it gets closer towards the

52:00

center of the black hole it starts

52:03

speeding up moving at the same speed on

52:05

a smaller and smaller orbit gaining more

52:08

and more angular spin the further down

52:10

the gravity well it falls just like the

52:13

ballerina you want to go a little

52:14

further in you have to spin a little

52:18

faster however unlike the ballerina this

52:21

matter has the speed of light to contend

52:24

with nothing in the universe can can

52:26

travel faster than the speed of light

52:28

this is a law discovered by Einstein so

52:31

what happens to our spinning matter as

52:33

it falls further and further into the

52:35

black hole due to the massive forces and

52:38

curvature involved it eventually reaches

52:40

a point where it cannot go any faster

52:43

it's hit a road block and because it

52:45

cannot spin faster it cannot fall

52:48

further into the black

52:49

hole this has several

52:52

effects to begin with as you can imagine

52:55

that creates friction all of this matter

52:59

spinning at such blistering speeds

53:01

around the edge of the Event Horizon

53:03

starts bumping into each other and when

53:05

this is taking place at near light

53:07

speeds things get very hot matter in a

53:11

black hole's accretion disc can reach

53:13

temperatures up to 10 million Kelvin

53:16

this is enough to melt anything down to

53:18

a hot plasma all these constant

53:20

collisions Pummel the atoms involved

53:23

causing them to give off more and more

53:25

of this energy like squeezing a lemon

53:28

this reduces their Mass between 10 and

53:32

40% of an atom's mass is given off this

53:35

way in the form of energy which then

53:37

radiates out Across the

53:39

Universe for a point of comparison

53:42

nuclear fusion the process taking place

53:44

in the sun converts only about 0.7% of

53:48

mass into

53:49

energy let that sink in for a moment

53:53

consider how bright the sun is at 0.7 %

53:57

how bright can a black hole's accretion

54:00

disc

54:01

get the brightest such discs are known

54:03

as quazars and they can reach

54:05

brightnesses that exceed 1,000 times the

54:08

total brightness of every star in the

54:11

Milky Way

54:13

combined the good news is that

54:15

additionally some of that momentum

54:17

starts to be shed with the departing

54:19

energy more gets shed by imparting it to

54:22

matter further up out of the accretion

54:24

disc as fast the moving particles knock

54:27

into slower particles moving just above

54:29

them giving them an extra push and

54:31

slowing down the lower particles in this

54:34

way matter starts to lose its angular

54:36

momentum and begins to finally fall into

54:39

the black hole itself more momentum can

54:42

be shed through one of the most striking

54:44

features of quazar and black holes their

54:47

Jets we don't understand everything

54:50

about these Jets how they form and what

54:52

they are comprised of and only a small

54:55

fraction of black holes with accretion

54:56

discs have them but current theories

54:59

suggest they are caused by magnetic

55:01

forces that are created by the spinning

55:03

accretion disc or even the rotational

55:06

power of the black hole itself which

55:08

draws up material from the accretion

55:10

discs and fires them out into

55:13

space it's likely that as the accretion

55:16

disc spins magnetic fields form in

55:19

keeping with ampers law due to all those

55:22

moving electrically charged particles

55:24

the power and shape of these field

55:26

fields are such that there is only a

55:28

narrow channel at the North and South

55:30

Poles of the black hole for particles to

55:32

escape these magnetic fields may work in

55:35

a similar way to the rifling on a gun

55:38

channeling particles down a narrow

55:40

Barrel particles moving at near

55:42

relativistic speeds have only one

55:45

direction they can go even though we

55:47

don't quite know yet why they go perhaps

55:50

they are like the steam of a kettle

55:52

fired out through the only Gap that

55:54

exists in the face of this incredible

55:56

gravitational and heat

55:58

pressure and when they go they go

56:02

relativistic Jets travel further than

56:05

the galaxies they originate from and are

56:07

often Millions if not billions of light

56:10

years long one jet with this catchy name

56:14

has his x-rays reaching Earth from 12.7

56:17

billion light years away albeit faintly

56:20

this is because the radiation produced

56:22

by such Jets is very focused in One

56:25

Direction in an effect known as

56:27

relativistic beaming or the lighthouse

56:30

effect when the beam is pointed away

56:32

from us it is much harder to see take

56:35

for example the now famous m87 Galaxy

56:39

here very clearly a relativistic jet is

56:42

detected by Hubble this is the one

56:45

coming towards us there is very likely

56:48

another jet but we can't see it because

56:50

it's going in the other

56:52

direction it's worth noting that this

56:54

energy does not come from the the black

56:56

hole directly remember nothing can

56:59

escape from a black hole instead the

57:01

matter and radiation come from the

57:03

accretion disc surrounding the black

57:05

hole and again a lot about these Jets is

57:09

still theoretical we can see them even

57:12

observe them moving over time but we

57:14

don't fully understand them or what

57:16

causes them our understanding of

57:19

accretion discs does not even fully

57:21

explain how conservation of momentum is

57:23

kept there is still some mystery about

57:26

where all the momentum goes but the

57:28

sheer power at play is

57:31

undeniable Einstein may have been wrong

57:34

it evidently is possible to fall into a

57:36

black hole but when some black holes are

57:39

firing material away from them at near

57:41

relativistic speeds for distances

57:43

spanning galaxies well it's evidently

57:47

possible to not fall into them too and

57:49

once you factor in the force of matter

57:52

that is millions of degrees hot pushing

57:54

out at you as they attempt to shed their

57:56

own momentum perhaps you wouldn't want

57:58

to get too close to one

58:01

anyway so we've seen how the or

58:04

inspiring effects of a black hole can

58:06

span entire galaxies but it begs the

58:09

question how big can a black hole

58:11

actually get finding the largest black

58:14

holes is not difficult all you need to

58:17

do is look at the center of large

58:19

galaxies these super massive black holes

58:22

have grown since their formation

58:24

billions of years ago more and more

58:26

matter fall into them continually

58:28

increasing their Mass the very largest

58:31

of these super massive black holes can

58:33

be billions of times the mass of our sun

58:36

however it may come as a surprise to you

58:38

to realize that some of the most massive

58:40

black holes we know of are actually the

58:44

youngest you see when we look at distant

58:47

galaxies we are also looking back in

58:49

time and the galaxies billions of light

58:51

years away often have the largest black

58:54

holes if the universe is only 13.8

58:57

billion years old and light takes

58:59

billions of years to reach us that means

59:01

the Galaxy we are observing can only be

59:04

a few billion years old at most from our

59:06

perspective pretty young for a

59:09

Galaxy surely though it should be the

59:11

case that nearer and thus older super

59:14

massive black holes are more massive

59:16

seeing as they've had so much extra time

59:18

to consume matter falling into them so

59:21

what's going on

59:22

here the very largest super massive

59:25

black hole we know of is known as ton

59:28

618 with an incredible mass of 66

59:31

billion solar masses by itself its mass

59:35

is comparable to the Milky Way

59:38

galaxy however ton 618 is exceptionally

59:41

far away and it's taking light emitted

59:44

by it 10.8 billion years to reach us

59:47

meaning we are observing it as it was

59:49

10.8 billion years ago this means it can

59:53

be at most around 2.8 billion years old

59:56

by comparison our own Milky Way galaxy

59:59

is approximately 13.6 billion years old

60:03

yet the super massive black hole found

60:05

at our Galaxy's core Sagittarius A star

60:08

is only 4 million solar masses the

60:11

andrometer Galaxy super massive black

60:13

hole while bigger is still only 200

60:17

million solar

60:18

masses one of the big factors to

60:20

consider here is the difficulty in

60:22

detecting and measuring black holes this

60:25

is still a really new field of research

60:28

as technology has only just allowed us

60:30

to start observing black holes in the

60:32

last few decades even then we can often

60:35

only observe the area surrounding black

60:37

holes that is before the event horizon

60:40

telescope came along but even that

60:42

telescope takes ages to image just one

60:45

black hole so our general understanding

60:48

really is still quite Limited in fact

60:51

most of the distant black holes we know

60:53

about can only be seen because they are

60:56

quazars ton 618 is a quazar matter is

61:01

pouring into the black hole's accretion

61:03

disc at an incredible rate and because

61:05

of this it's erupted into a

61:07

quazar quazars can only be sustained as

61:10

long as matter is falling into them

61:12

otherwise they revert back to dark black

61:15

holes it's hard to fully grasp the

61:17

physics of the accretion disc but it is

61:19

believed that the friction here is so

61:21

great the accretion disc of aaza by

61:24

itself can produce thous thousands of

61:26

times more light than entire galaxies

61:29

combined ton 618 produces as much light

61:34

as40 trillion Suns completely outshining

61:37

the Galaxy it resides in to the point

61:40

that we can't even see it from our

61:42

perspective however because quazars are

61:45

the brightest objects in the universe

61:47

they can be seen from very far away so

61:50

one reason for large black holes being

61:52

far away is down to something known as

61:55

malmquist

61:56

bias this is where brighter objects

61:59

further away appear more plentiful when

62:01

in reality we simply can't see the

62:03

dimmer objects at that distance implying

62:06

there may be an argument that the

62:07

largest super massive black holes are

62:09

actually distributed fairly evenly

62:11

throughout the Universe if a galaxy has

62:14

a very large black hole but it's not a

62:16

quaza it means we won't see it after a

62:18

certain distance because a galaxy is

62:20

much dimmer than a

62:22

quaza another reason why we don't see

62:25

the biggest black holds close to us is

62:27

due to the nature of the universe itself

62:29

shortly after the big bang as you may

62:32

know the universe is ever expanding and

62:34

during the early Universe matter was a

62:36

lot closer together quazar were more

62:39

common back then because they need

62:41

extreme amounts of matter falling into

62:43

them to give off light and there was a

62:45

lot more gas around during the early

62:47

stages of the universe not only has the

62:49

universe expanded but over time gas gets

62:52

converted into Stars some of the largest

62:55

types of stars eventually turn into

62:57

neutron stars and black holes themselves

63:00

meaning that they never get recycled

63:01

back into gas less available gas means

63:05

less gas will fall into a super massive

63:07

black hole one of the theories for the

63:09

fate of the universe is actually based

63:11

on this called the big freeze where

63:14

after some trillions of years all the

63:16

gas in the universe is eventually

63:18

converted into black holes even now we

63:21

see some galaxies where their gas has

63:23

been completely used up meaning no new

63:25

Stars can form these are called

63:28

elliptical galaxies spiral galaxies

63:31

still have gas and dust structures and

63:33

thus can still produce new stars it is

63:36

interesting that most of the largest

63:38

super massive black holes appear to be

63:40

in elliptical galaxies where there is no

63:42

gas left gas needs to lose momentum to

63:45

fall into the Galaxy's Central super

63:47

massive black hole and if that happened

63:50

then the supermassive black hole is

63:52

likely to be much bigger because of all

63:54

the infalling matter with elliptical

63:56

galaxies this is already happened

63:59

whereas with spiral galaxies this hasn't

64:01

happened to the same extent one such

64:04

trigger for gas losing angular momentum

64:07

could be the gravitational influence of

64:09

nearby galaxies or even collisions with

64:11

other

64:12

galaxies in addition there is less gas

64:15

available in the universe now than there

64:17

was during the early universe so black

64:19

hole growth probably occurred rapidly

64:21

then but a slowed down now this might be

64:25

why there is no quazar within 500

64:27

million light years of us as the

64:29

universe ages and Things become less

64:32

chaotic and more spread out the number

64:34

of active quazar has decreased which

64:36

means the only quazar we see some of

64:39

which are the largest black holes we

64:40

know of are the ones that happened a

64:42

long time

64:45

ago so why are the largest super massive

64:48

black holes often the youngest well

64:51

although it may appear that way it might

64:53

not actually be the case at all we we

64:55

can measure distant bright quazar simply

64:57

because we can see them older and closer

65:00

black holes may also be large but

65:03

because of malmquist bias we haven't

65:05

found them yet as studies continue and

65:07

Technology improves we'll start to get a

65:09

more complete picture of the universe

65:11

around

65:12

[Music]

65:14

us we've discussed black holes a lot on

65:17

this channel because they are

65:18

fascinating regions of SpaceTime where

65:21

curvature is really pushed to the

65:23

extreme they exhibit features and

65:25

phenomena far beyond any intuition we

65:28

could have built from classical physics

65:30

here on Earth but despite all the

65:32

attention they've been getting black

65:34

holes aren't the only way SpaceTime can

65:37

show off its beautiful Curves in theory

65:41

they can be equally curved regions of

65:43

SpaceTime called white holes which get

65:46

their name because they are in many ways

65:49

the exact opposite of black holes and in

65:52

some cases a black hole and a white hole

65:55

can be connected connected by a totally

65:57

different type of SpaceTime called a

66:00

wormhole which functions as a kind of

66:02

limbo zone between parallel

66:05

universes if you've heard of space

66:07

travel through wormholes and thought it

66:09

wasn't more than just a fancy sci-fi

66:11

invention I don't blame you after all

66:14

even though these regions are possible

66:16

in theory there isn't any evidence that

66:18

white holes or wormholes actually exist

66:21

in our

66:22

universe but 100 years ago it was black

66:25

hole that were purely theoretical and

66:28

now we think there are literally

66:30

billions of them out there for our

66:32

telescopes to see so in this video we're

66:36

going to try to answer three questions

66:38

for you just what are these other holes

66:41

that we can have in SpaceTime should we

66:44

have our hopes up that they might be

66:45

more than science fiction and what do

66:48

they look like if they are

66:51

real I'm Alex molan and you're watching

66:54

astram join me today as we explore the

66:57

different types of SpaceTime that can

66:59

result from extreme

67:01

curvature I think the possibilities will

67:04

bend your mind as much as they warp the

67:06

fabric of the universe around

67:09

them before we dive into the physics of

67:12

SpaceTime described by Einstein's theory

67:15

of general relativity I want to start

67:17

off with a simple analogy if I ask you

67:21

to imagine a cone you'll probably think

67:24

of either something that points up like

67:26

a traffic cone or something that points

67:28

down like an ice cream cone these are

67:32

what we think of as cones in the real

67:34

world but if you write down the most

67:37

General mathematical equation for a cone

67:40

and try graphing it you'll get something

67:42

that looks like two cones glued together

67:46

you see a mathematical cone has two

67:48

halves one that points up and one that

67:51

points down connected at their tips and

67:54

what we think of as cones in the real

67:56

world are actually just chopped up

67:59

pieces of the full mathematical

68:01

cone black holes are exactly the same

68:05

way let me explain many of the black

68:08

holes we see in the universe are

68:10

remnants of massive stars whose extreme

68:14

gravity caused them to collapse in on

68:16

themselves once a black hole is created

68:19

it becomes permanently separated from

68:21

the World Around It by a spherical

68:23

barrier known as The Event Horizon

68:26

anything can fall into the black hole

68:28

but nothing not even light can come out

68:32

this structure of SpaceTime can be

68:34

neatly summarized in what physicists

68:36

call a pen rose diagram which is a way

68:39

of representing an infinite SpaceTime in

68:41

a finite drawing the key feature of a

68:44

Penrose diagram is that light travels

68:47

upwards at 45° angles making it easy to

68:50

distinguish regions where light can or

68:53

cannot enter in this diagram region one

68:57

is the regular Universe containing the

69:00

original Star before it turned into a

69:02

black hole and everything outside it

69:05

from the infinite past to the infinite

69:08

future region two is the black hole and

69:12

is separated from the rest of the

69:13

universe by its Event Horizon you can

69:16

see how it's easy for light to enter the

69:18

black hole region two but it's

69:21

impossible for light to exit it will

69:24

inevitably hit this Singularity instead

69:27

the same holds true for ordinary matter

69:30

which moves slower than light and so in

69:32

this diagram can only travel upwards at

69:35

Angles steeper than

69:37

45° so what's so special about this

69:40

Penrose diagram is that it accounts for

69:43

the formation of the black hole at some

69:45

specific point in time when the star

69:47

collapsed in on itself in the far past

69:51

there was no event horizon or black hole

69:53

to speak of and light could travel fre

69:55

really across all of space but while

69:58

this diagram represents the kind of

69:59

black hole we're used to seeing in the

70:01

real world it's only one piece of the

70:04

full mathematical description of black

70:06

holes in general

70:07

relativity in other words it is the lone

70:11

ice cream cone of black hole

70:15

diagrams so what happens if we forget

70:19

the real world and imagine an ideal

70:21

black hole with an infinite past leaving

70:24

behind the baggage of collapsing stars

70:26

and everything else in the physical

70:28

Universe what is the black hole analog

70:31

of the full mathematical cone it might

70:35

look like a simple extension of our

70:37

original Penrose diagram but this

70:40

diagram comes with physics that's a

70:42

little upside

70:44

down region one is still our regular

70:47

universe and region two is still a black

70:49

hole with an inevitable singularity in

70:52

its future but the maths also describe

70:55

something that looks like the inverse of

70:58

a black hole in Region 3 instead of a

71:01

singularity in its future Region 3 has a

71:03

singularity in its past and if you draw

71:07

the motion of light rays at 45° angles

71:10

you see that it's straightforward for

71:12

light to leave Region 3 but it can never

71:16

enter it this type of region is exactly

71:19

what we would call a white hole it's the

71:22

SpaceTime analog of a traffic cone

71:25

but that's not all if you look beyond

71:28

the white hle you'll see there's a patch

71:30

of SpaceTime labeled Region 4 with the

71:33

same connections to the black and white

71:34

holes in the middle of the regular

71:36

Universe this patch is a parallel

71:40

universe and it's entirely disconnected

71:42

from the universe in region one since

71:44

it's impossible for even light to travel

71:47

from one region to the

71:50

other the upshot of all this is that the

71:53

same mathematical equation describes

71:55

desing the regular universe and the

71:57

black hole also describes the parallel

72:00

universe and the white hole this doesn't

72:03

mean that every black hole comes

72:05

attached to a white hole though just

72:08

like with cones the real Universe can

72:10

contain chopped up pieces of the full

72:12

mathematical solution but this does mean

72:16

that even if white holes are less common

72:18

than their black hole counterparts or

72:21

even if there aren't any white holes

72:23

connected to our universe at all it

72:25

doesn't make them any less scientific in

72:28

the sense that they are equally

72:30

consistent with the laws of

72:31

physics in our analogy if you imagine

72:35

that ice cream cones remain extremely

72:37

popular while traffic cones become

72:39

difficult to produce and are phased out

72:41

of existence that doesn't make the idea

72:44

of a traffic cone any less

72:46

real this is more or less the status of

72:49

white holes today the notion of a white

72:52

hole makes perfect sense but it's Poss

72:55

possible that any white holes that

72:56

existed in the past were unstable and

72:59

were similarly phased out of existence

73:02

if you're wondering whether there could

73:03

be some more stable white holes that

73:05

have just escaped our sight you're not

73:07

the only one and you should stick around

73:10

for when we talk about the tiniest

73:11

possible white holes in just a few

73:13

minutes but first I want to make sure

73:15

we're not leaving anyone hanging I

73:17

promised you wormholes I promise you

73:19

parallel universes that are actually

73:21

connected to each other so buckle up

73:23

because we're about to go to to a whole

73:25

new level of warped

73:30

SpaceTime the noad theorem says that a

73:33

black hole can have up to three

73:35

intrinsic properties Mass charge and

73:39

spin but the Penrose diagram I showed

73:41

you only described the simplest kind of

73:44

black hole which was electrically

73:46

neutral and completely stationary the

73:49

diagrams for charged or spinning black

73:51

holes are much more complicated but

73:53

they're also much more exciting in

73:55

because they completely alter our

73:57

understanding of singularities and they

73:59

give rise to new and fascinating regions

74:02

of

74:03

SpaceTime let's have a look at the

74:05

Penrose diagram for a spinning black

74:07

hole as an example instead of four

74:09

distinct regions of space time there are

74:12

now eight types of regions that repeat

74:15

themselves in an infinite pattern of

74:17

universes region one through four are

74:20

the same ones we saw before these are

74:22

the regular Universe the black hole the

74:24

white hole and the parallel universe but

74:27

now that the black hole is spinning its

74:30

geometry no longer has an unavoidable

74:33

singularity in its future and the white

74:35

hole similarly loses the singularity

74:38

that existed in its

74:40

past so what actually happens after you

74:43

cross the Event Horizon of a spinning

74:45

black hole at first you'll be drawn

74:48

towards the center of the black hole

74:50

just like you'd expect but eventually

74:53

you'll cross a threshold known as the

74:55

inner Horizon Beyond which the geometry

74:58

of SpaceTime unw warps and lets you stop

75:02

yourself from falling even deeper in

75:05

these innermost regions marked five and

75:07

seven you can float freely towards or

75:10

away from the center of the black hole

75:13

you could even touch the singularity if

75:15

you wanted to though I wouldn't

75:17

recommend it here in these innermost

75:20

regions of a curved rotating SpaceTime

75:23

you are officially in a wormhole and if

75:26

it weren't for the fact that you are

75:28

permanently separated from everyone who

75:30

stayed in region one this would have

75:32

been the perfect time for you to brag

75:34

about your wild Space

75:35

Adventures at this point you're also

75:38

faced with a bit of a fork in the road

75:41

one option is to keep moving Inward and

75:43

go around the singularity which takes

75:46

the shape of a ring instead of a point

75:48

for spinning black holes this path would

75:50

take you to region 6 or 8 in the diagram

75:55

but it's quite possible that the

75:57

existence of this path is actually a

76:00

flaw in the predictions of general

76:02

relativity rather than a true

76:04

description of reality because going

76:06

even in a single loop around the

76:08

singularity can lead to causal paradoxes

76:11

where you visit your own past a safer

76:14

bet would be to turn around and move

76:16

outwards Crossing back into the inner

76:18

Horizon that you just came out of this

76:20

would take you into Region Three a white

76:23

hole which would then then carry you all

76:25

the way out to a brand new universe

76:28

similar to the structure to the one you

76:30

started out in originally but sadly

76:32

without your friends or family waiting

76:34

for you in fact by the time you get here

76:37

your old universe will have already

76:40

experienced an infinite amount of time

76:43

you would be living in a whole new

76:46

definition of the

76:49

future okay let's step back into reality

76:52

as fun as that Journey Through the

76:53

Wormhole was in theory you probably

76:56

couldn't survive it in practice and

76:59

honestly there's a good chance that the

77:00

Wormhole itself would collapse once you

77:02

disturbed at SpaceTime so how much of

77:05

this mathematical structure can we

77:07

expect to see in the real world spinning

77:10

black holes with event Horizons appear

77:13

to be everywhere in the universe but

77:15

what goes on inside of them is still

77:17

largely unknown there are two main

77:20

reasons for why physics inside real

77:22

black holes might be different from what

77:24

the Penrose diag would lead you to

77:26

believe First when black holes form from

77:29

the turbulent collapse of massive stars

77:31

some assumptions that went into making

77:33

the Penrose diagram are violated like

77:36

that the black hole existed forever or

77:39

that the Universe around it is perfectly

77:41

symmetric and doesn't contain random

77:43

infalling humans and second the theory

77:46

of general relativity used to construct

77:49

the Penrose diagram might itself only be

77:52

approximately correct breaking down near

77:55

The Singularity where the curvature gets

77:57

most extreme so there's a good chance

78:00

that some predictions of the diagram

78:02

especially the most problematic ones

78:04

involving singularities and time travel

78:06

paradoxes aren't real features of a

78:09

highly curved SpaceTime but the

78:11

existence of white holes is more of an

78:14

open possibility leaving plenty of room

78:16

for speculation about how they might

78:18

come to be and whether they might leave

78:21

any observational Footprints for us to

78:23

discover

78:25

one hypothesis that's recently gained

78:27

some traction is that a white hole is

78:29

born whenever a black hole dies and no

78:33

this isn't some magical story of

78:34

reincarnation or Voodoo it's a genuine

78:37

attempt to understand the full life

78:39

cycle of black holes with at least some

78:41

level of mathematical

78:44

backing you see even an isolated black

78:47

hole in an otherwise empty space will

78:49

continuously emit particles known as

78:52

Hawking radiation causing it to

78:54

gradually shrink and lose Mass over time

78:57

but once the black hole reaches the

78:59

super tiny plank Mass just about 20

79:03

microgram we have no way of predicting

79:06

what future awaits it at least not

79:08

without a full theory of quantum

79:11

gravity this is where Loop quantum

79:13

gravity comes in a proposed link between

79:16

gravity and quantum mechanics in which

79:18

space itself is made of discrete Loops

79:22

in short the equations of loop Quantum

79:24

Gra gravity predict that instead of

79:26

continuing to shrink even smaller than

79:28

the plank Mass such a tiny black hole is

79:30

instead more likely to Quantum tunnel

79:33

into a white hole spewing out its

79:35

contents back into the universe over an

79:37

extended period of time incredibly even

79:41

though this white hole will be similarly

79:43

small and light it can contain an

79:45

enormous amount of entropy because its

79:48

interior geometry will have been

79:50

stretched into a thin tube with an

79:52

extremely large volume

79:55

this store of entropy could potentially

79:57

open a pathway for any information that

79:59

falls into a black hole to be recovered

80:01

in the distant future solving a decades

80:04

long problem in theoretical physics

80:06

known as the information

80:09

Paradox as the white hole releases this

80:11

information it begins to slowly Fade Out

80:14

of existence the SpaceTime around it

80:16

loses its curvature and its life cycle

80:19

comes to a

80:20

close but before this video comes to a

80:23

close let me leave you with one last

80:26

thought in general relativity our whole

80:29

universe is predicted to have had a

80:31

singularity in its past namely 14

80:35

billion years ago at the moment of the

80:37

Big Bang in this way the universe is

80:40

like an uncharged stationary white hole

80:44

but if Loop quantum gravity says that

80:46

white holes can be born when black holes

80:49

collapse could the same be true about

80:51

the creation of our universe

80:54

could it be that our expanding Universe

80:57

was born From the Ashes of an older

81:00

Contracting

81:01

SpaceTime as crazy as this seems Loop

81:05

quantum gravity says that may well be

81:07

the

81:09

case but there are so many different

81:12

ideas for how this transition could have

81:14

happened that we would need a whole new

81:16

video just to scratch the

81:18

surface so if you want to hear more

81:20

about how the big bang could have

81:22

actually been a big bounce let us know

81:25

in the comments below the history of the

81:27

universe may hold more surprises

81:32

yet thanks for watching making this

81:36

video required some long-term planning

81:38

and work which we were only able to do

81:41

thanks to the consistency and

81:42

sustainability of your memberships as

81:44

astronauts on patreon a huge thank you

81:47

to everyone who has signed up and if

81:49

you'd like us to make more videos like

81:51

this you can join with the link down

81:54

below

81:55

when you join you'll be able to watch

81:56

the whole video ad free see your name in

81:59

the credits and submit questions to our

82:03

team once again a huge thank you from

82:06

myself and the whole astrom

82:14

team meanwhile click the link to this

82:17

playlist for more astrom content I'll

82:19

see you next time

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.