TRANSCRIPTEnglish

It's Over: Trump Immunity | Supreme Court | Biden v Trump.

14m 49s2,696 words379 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

big day for the Supreme Court as the

0:02

Supreme Court has ruled on Donald

0:03

Trump's immunity and let's just put it

0:06

straight Donald Trump calls this a win

0:09

social media that supports Donald Trump

0:11

calls this a win Chuck Schumer calls the

0:13

Supreme Court decision a Maga decision

0:16

and the reality is somewhere in between

0:20

yes this is a win for Trump as there

0:23

could have been a ruling that suggested

0:25

presidents have no immunity but that was

0:29

not what was an expected outcome here

0:31

see what I always like to do is I like

0:33

to think of cops cops work for the

0:35

government and they benefit from

0:37

something known as qualified immunity

0:40

this basically allows them to be immune

0:42

from prose uh prosecution as long as

0:44

they're fulfilling their official duties

0:46

and it would be logical that this would

0:48

apply to the president as well qualified

0:50

immunity holds that if as long as

0:52

someone doesn't establish or or violate

0:55

rather clearly established law then

0:59

they're protected from harassment or

1:02

distraction of litigation the purpose

1:05

there is really to allow officials in

1:07

government to do their job without

1:09

getting willy-nilly prosecuted all the

1:11

time and they're sitting in court all

1:12

the time uh and then they can't actually

1:15

do their Duty because they're sitting in

1:17

court defending themselves all the time

1:19

the whole point of qualified immunity is

1:23

hey you got a job to do some people

1:25

aren't going to like that you got a job

1:26

to do but as long as you follow the

1:27

Constitution you're good and so when it

1:30

comes to Donald Trump what the Supreme

1:31

Court here said is yes the president

1:35

does have

1:36

immunity criminal liability immunity

1:40

against any kind of criminal liability

1:42

for official actions on behalf of the

1:45

government but they can be held liable

1:48

for private acts unofficial acts this is

1:51

kind of like a cop who's on duty might

1:53

have qualified immunity but in their

1:55

personal lives don't that is totally

1:58

logical it's basically the same standard

2:01

now yes the decision was a 63 split so a

2:04

lot of folks are going oh this was a

2:05

conservative tilt this was a you know uh

2:07

this is a hacked job by Trump appointed

2:10

Supreme Court Justices but when I apply

2:14

this to where else in law we have

2:17

something similar in this case law

2:19

enforcement for my analogy this ruling

2:22

actually is broadly in line with what

2:25

you would expect that the same immunity

2:28

that cops get is the same immunity that

2:30

a president gets so now the debate comes

2:34

okay well are you acting on behalf of

2:36

the government and are you acting in a

2:39

manner that is consistent with your job

2:42

right if you're going above and beyond

2:44

your job and doing things that violate

2:46

the law uh that aren't reasonably in

2:49

line with your job then that qualified

2:51

immunity goes away some examples now

2:56

Donald Trump is able to protect

2:58

conversations that he has in official

3:00

business so in talks with Mike Pence or

3:03

in talks with the Department of Justice

3:05

or in talks with his staff emails text

3:09

messages phone call records uh memos

3:12

notes minutes for meetings all that

3:15

stuff could be protected under this

3:18

immunity ruling this makes it a lot

3:20

harder for prosecutors to try to put a

3:22

case together against Donald Trump and

3:25

this is why folks are seeing this as a

3:26

win for Trump because now prosecu like

3:30

Jack Smith have to make an argument that

3:32

hey well you violated the law and we're

3:36

going to find proof for you violating

3:40

the law Jack Smith's charges just to

3:42

remind you against Donald Trump are

3:44

conspiracy to defraud the US conspiracy

3:47

against the right of Americans to vote

3:48

obstructing an official proceeding and

3:50

conspiracy to do so for first of all to

3:53

get those conspiracy claims you're going

3:56

to somehow have to get evidence that

4:00

there was any conspiracy you're going to

4:02

need access to phone records emails text

4:05

messages conversation minutes well if

4:08

that's now all protected under immunity

4:10

those conversations under official

4:12

business it's going to be really hard

4:15

for Jack SM Smith to get anything on the

4:17

conspiracy front so then it just comes

4:20

down to what did Donald Trump publicly

4:22

say on frankly January 6 and you know we

4:27

had quotes like we're going to fight

4:29

like hell but then we also had quotes

4:31

like we're going to peacefully

4:33

protest so there's like fighting like

4:36

hell for your Constitution that doesn't

4:38

necessarily mean punching people in the

4:40

face with

4:41

polls uh and not not to be confused with

4:44

voting polls I mean like met metal

4:46

polls uh and then there's you know maybe

4:49

that's not even punching might not even

4:51

be the right word right but but that's

4:52

maybe not is is that what Trump meant

4:54

when Trump says fight like hell did he

4:55

mean whack somebody with a pole or did

4:57

he mean you know we're going to we're

4:59

going to make our voice is heard okay

5:01

that now gets debated and Jack Smith

5:04

just basically got limited on what kind

5:06

of text messages he could get between

5:08

Trump and Ivanka let's say or Trump and

5:11

Pence to see where Trump's head was you

5:14

know if there was a text where Trump's

5:15

like ha look at them beat up Congress

5:18

for uh uh not uh electing me this is

5:22

exactly what I wanted them to do well

5:23

that would be a Smoking Gun I don't

5:25

think Trump would be dumb enough to

5:26

actually put that in writing but that

5:27

would be a Smoking Gun that would really

5:28

help Jack Smith now Jack Smith can't

5:31

even look so that's why this is being

5:33

cast as a win for Trump now is this

5:35

really in my opinion like some magga

5:38

immunity ruling where you have sod mayor

5:40

going oh now the Trump you know or any

5:42

president could do some you know illegal

5:44

hit squad organization with Navy Seals

5:47

and and could kill anyone they want with

5:49

IM you know immunity well no I I

5:52

personally don't think so because now

5:55

you could be arguing that a president is

5:57

violating clearly established norms or

5:59

laws were going above their Call of

6:02

Duty not to make reference to the video

6:05

game Sorry although it is a good game

6:07

and there are way less as far as I'm

6:09

aware cheaters in Call of Duty than

6:11

there are in Rust in Rust everybody's a

6:13

cheat it's it's so toxic it's just bad

6:15

but anyway going back to politics which

6:17

is the point of what we're talking about

6:19

here right after I mentioned life

6:20

insurance you can get life insurance in

6:22

as little as 5 minutes by going to met

6:23

kevin.com lifee if any of this stresses

6:25

you out it's a paid promotion SP it's a

6:28

an affiliate of the channel but anyway

6:30

let's think about this the Justice the

6:33

justice department at the top of it

6:35

basically the uh uh the Supreme Court or

6:37

the top of the justice system what they

6:39

really did is they just sent the hard

6:40

work back to the lower courts like look

6:45

official mostly immune as long as it

6:48

follows the law non-official not immune

6:51

now you go figure out what's what okay

6:54

so this is then where lower courts are

6:56

going to have to decide did Donald Trump

6:59

inside

7:01

violence was that speech that campaign

7:04

speech an official speech or a

7:06

non-official speech all of those things

7:08

are going to get thrown to the lower

7:09

courts the lower courts will have to

7:11

decide on those without being able to

7:13

get a lot of conversation evidence so

7:14

they're really just going to have to use

7:15

public information and then the lower

7:18

courts would have to rule find Donald

7:20

Trump guilty basically based on you know

7:23

uh based on public information that we

7:25

have which seems like it's going to be a

7:27

stretch and even if they do

7:30

the odds are would just end up getting

7:31

appealed right back to the Supreme Court

7:33

so this stuff is going to be going on

7:35

for years we're going absolutely nowhere

7:39

with this anytime soon so in my opinion

7:42

if I had to put this on sort of the

7:43

scale of is this a trump win is this a

7:45

Maga win is this you know a a leftwing

7:48

wing well it's obviously not a leftwing

7:50

win I don't think it's 100% you know

7:53

Trump win because you you do still have

7:56

some potential risk but it's probably a

7:58

70% Trump win uh and so and I think the

8:02

comparison to Law Enforcement Officers

8:04

is useful uh because it does preserve

8:07

something that's pretty well understood

8:09

in courts today that hey as long as

8:11

you're doing things that are reasonable

8:13

you're immune because we don't want to

8:15

distract you from being able to function

8:17

uh at your uh workplace because you're

8:20

constantly being harassed uh or you're

8:22

fearful of being liable for actions that

8:24

you're doing on behalf of the United

8:26

States so excuse me those are going to

8:29

be the questions none of this is going

8:31

to happen before the election uh the

8:33

next thing that happened now is we're

8:35

standing by to see

8:37

if well quite frankly Joe Biden is going

8:39

to make an announcement on July 4th

8:41

that's my anticipation so far things

8:43

seem pretty quiet in Camp Biden uh but

8:46

we'll see how that goes and in the

8:48

meantime Donald Trump is already

8:51

starting to cheer uh about how much of a

8:53

win this is and they're fundraising on

8:55

the back of this but then again you know

8:57

that almost no matter what the rule

8:59

ruling would have been Donald Trump

9:00

would have been cheering uh fundraising

9:03

over this so uh we can actually look at

9:07

some of the uh messages here Donald

9:09

Trump's today's historic decision by the

9:12

Supreme Court should end all of Joe

9:14

Biden's crooked witch hunts against

9:16

me uh including the New York hoaxes the

9:19

Manhattan scam cooked up by the Soros

9:21

spack da Alvin Bragg racist New York

9:24

attorney general Trish James Shameless

9:26

attack on the amazing businesses I have

9:27

built and the fake Berg off cas

9:29

proud to be an American solid scotus

9:32

ruling says Trump Jr I'm sure the

9:35

corrupt prosecutors and DC judge will

9:38

work overtime to continue their law fair

9:40

it's all they have big win for

9:42

Constitution and democracy proud to be

9:44

an

9:45

American uh yeah and then they talk

9:47

about some older information here about

9:49

the debates so that's uh that's a little

9:51

bit here from the uh Trump Camp I seen

9:56

some

9:57

comments from the

10:00

left uh but uh there is a new ad from

10:05

the Biden admin and it's probably going

10:08

to be worth watching so let's just to

10:10

balance this out let's go ahead and give

10:11

it a listen here uh it comes with the

10:13

caption folks I know I'm not a young man

10:16

but I know how to do this job I know how

10:18

to tell the truth Donald Trump does not

10:20

watch our new ad keep in mind both of

10:22

them lied during the debate I mean we

10:24

fact checked it live while we were

10:26

covering it and both of them said things

10:28

that were a little loony uh you know

10:30

like killing babies after they're born

10:32

as a form of abortion that's Looney uh

10:34

you know the the Biden the economy was

10:36

flat when I took over no it wasn't uh

10:39

you know but then also you know both of

10:40

them were responsible inflation so so

10:42

there're just lies on both Sid so I

10:44

always think it's a little soft when one

10:45

side's like the other side's a liar yeah

10:48

both sides lie it's just a matter of you

10:50

know what do Americans think about the

10:53

long-term direction of where we want to

10:55

go in the future and uh who do whose

10:58

lies do we believe or less important all

11:02

right let's listen in

11:04

here did you see Trump last night I mean

11:08

sincerely the most lies told in a single

11:11

debate he lied about the great economy

11:13

he created he lied about the pandemic he

11:17

bot and then his biggest lie he lied

11:21

about how he had nothing to do with the

11:23

Insurrection in January

11:25

6 mind you this is the teleprompter

11:28

version of Joe Biden at the uh North

11:32

Carolina rally in Raleigh North Carolina

11:36

we all saw with our own eyes we're going

11:38

to walk down to the capital and I'll be

11:41

there with you we saw a police being

11:43

attacked the capital being rans sack he

11:47

did not a single thing to stop it

11:49

nothing I In fairness it was a little

11:52

slow Donald Trump's response but

11:54

eventually he did come out and suggest

11:56

hey go home everybody should go home

12:00

it it just it came a little late I I

12:02

I'll give I'll give him that but to say

12:04

Donald Trump did nothing is also a lie

12:07

uh and again you know this this idea

12:09

that uh the economy was flat when Biden

12:12

took over which Biden saying Trump lied

12:15

about the state of the economy is also

12:16

untrue the economy is growing at over a

12:18

16% Pace in January of 2021 so like like

12:22

I say they they both lie it's like it's

12:25

like politician and lie like go together

12:27

you know folks I know I'm not a young

12:30

man and I know how to do this

12:33

job I know right from

12:36

wrong I know how to tell the

12:39

truth and I know like millions of

12:41

Americans know when you get knocked down

12:44

you get back

12:46

up I'm Joe Biden and I approve this

12:49

message hey you know it's it's exciting

12:53

right like if you're a Biden supporter

12:55

you're like hell yeah you know that's a

12:57

great ad awesome look at entic Joe uh

13:00

the frustration that I have is it's it's

13:02

teleprompter Joe uh and and you know I

13:05

don't mean that as an insult I think

13:07

some people think it's like oh you're

13:09

just anti- uh Democrat or whatever no I

13:12

I think there are plenty of great uh

13:15

Democrats that could lead this nation uh

13:19

but I don't think Biden can lead this

13:21

nation I think uh unfortunately the

13:24

teleprompter and the script writers are

13:25

leading the nation with Biden uh and so

13:27

that personally just makes me me

13:30

uncomfortable uh but uh but otherwise

13:32

hey I'll keep trying to bring as much uh

13:35

information as I can from as impartial

13:37

as a manner as possible uh I'll let you

13:39

know when something is a fact and when

13:41

something is an opinion so that way you

13:42

can make up your own mind thank you so

13:44

much for watching we'll see you in the

13:45

next one goodbye and good luck cannot

13:47

advertise these things that you told us

13:48

here I feel like nobody else knows about

13:50

this we'll we'll try a little

13:51

advertising and see how it goes

13:52

congratulations man you have done so

13:54

much people love you people look up to

13:56

you Kevin PA there financial analyst and

13:58

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

14:00

your

14:01

take even though I'm a licensed

14:03

financial adviser licensed real estate

14:04

broker and becoming a stock broker this

14:05

video is not personalized advice for you

14:07

it is not tax legal or otherwise

14:09

personalized advice tailored to you this

14:11

video provides generalized perspective

14:12

information and commentary any

14:14

thirdparty content I show shall not be

14:16

deemed endorsed by me this video is not

14:18

and shall never be deemed reasonably

14:19

sufficient information for the purposes

14:21

of evaluating a security or investment

14:22

decision any links or promoted products

14:24

are either paid affiliations or products

14:26

or Services we may benefit from I also

14:28

personally operate in actively managed

14:29

ETF I may personally hold or otherwise

14:32

hold long or short positions in various

14:34

Securities potentially including those

14:35

mentioned in this video however I have

14:37

no relationship to any issuer other than

14:39

house Haack nor am I presently acting as

14:41

a market maker make sure if you're

14:42

considering investing in house Haack to

14:43

always read the PPM at house hack.com

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.