Elon Musk JUST Filed a Massive Lawsuit | Full Breakdown.

well Elon Musk is back at it again this

time Elon Musk and the ex-corporation

formerly known as Twitter are suing the

Attorney General of California now don't

get me wrong I love the idea of beating

up on California because it needs to be

beaten up on but boy I got some

reservations about this lawsuit here's

what we're gonna do I'm gonna break down

what this lawsuit is then I'm going to

go through what I think the weakest part

of this entire lawsuit is and quite

frankly when you listen to the weak part

that I reveal in my opinion it turns the

entire lawsuit on its head and makes

Elon Musk seem like a weenie baby but

let's talk about the facts first and

keep the bias out so that way the Elon

can do no wrong viewers still have

something to watch for at least a few

more minutes all right so the nature of

action here I've got the entire

complaint here I've gone through all of

it and I'm going to give you the gist of

it so basically California at the end of

2022 right around a year ago September

of 2022 past this law called assembly

Bill 587 assembly Bill 587 requires that

companies that are social media

companies which Twitter includes post

their terms of service dictated by the

government and include terms about how

content is moderate that's Twitter's

definition the actual quote though and

this is going to become very important

so listen to this quote super carefully

because you'll see why it comes up

importantly later but anyway

social media companies shall submit

quote a terms of service report end

quote that includes among other things

quote a detailed description of content

moderation practices used by the social

media company for the platform and

information about weather and if so how

the social media company defines and

moderates hate speech racism extremism

radicalization disinformation

misinformation harassment foreign policy

interference as well as blah blah other

information this is all defined under

the terms of service report definition

in AB 587

Twitter now the x-corp is basically

arguing that this violates the First

Amendment of the Constitution because it

basically requires Twitter determine

what their policy is on well what is

extremism like if we say we're going to

go peacefully protest at the you know

you know with the calls of Congress is

that extreme is that inciting violence

it basically makes Twitter have to take

a stance that's what Twitter is alleging

Twitter is alleging that they don't want

to take a stance on what is a pronoun

what is a woman what is a guy a man what

is hate speech what is racism what is

radicalization and they're basically

saying look first of all we're going to

use the Dorman uh commerce clause which

is just a fancy way of saying this is

congress's job not yours California once

again you're overstepping your

boundaries and we don't want you messing

with our Free Speech we don't want you

defining how we should view the world

and so far honestly that sounds very

reasonable and acts to their defense

they say things like look ultimately we

do not want to fall victim to this

complex dilemma which has previously

been defined uh as a criticism

potentially of ab587 which is that

social media companies might end up

being forced into too much moderation

and therefore accusations of censorship

and suppressed speech or too little

moderation and then the platform risks

fostering a toxic and sometimes

dangerous community

Twitter goes as far as then taking some

of the more left-leaning quotes and

examples from what originally got this

law passed like quotes from Anthony

Weiner uh or sorry Scott weiner

answering Scott weiner different

politician uh Scott weiner he's a

Democrat of California and taking quotes

from him suggesting that oh yeah we want

social media companies to be pressured

into taking a stance on this because if

we pressure companies social media

companies to take a stance on these

different issues uh by law then all of a

sudden we make sure that they have a

legal obligation to quote not become

engines for violent hate speech so so

far this all sounds reasonable right

Twitter's making the argument look we

don't want to take a stance on this we

shouldn't be obligated to this because a

that's congress's job B we're not here

to be your leftist weapon of liberal

defense mechanisms for whatever it is

that you want in terms of how you define

hate speech and different disinformation

or misinformation and so far when you

phrase all of x's uh arguments like this

it makes a lot of sense they go through

here and say look what is hate speech

what are gender programs what about the

fight over transgenderism and again what

what are the biological definitions

supposed to be Twitter's like look we

just want to be a platform that's

protected by section 230 of the

communications decency act which

basically says look we are a platform

not a publisher when you are a platform

you have immunity from the posts of

others as long as you follow the law in

basically moderating things that violate

the law where necessary a publisher is

like a newspaper where they can kind of

choose what they post and that limits a

Publisher's immunity because they have

Choice rather than having like a user go

post whatever they want then if a user

violates the law it's not Twitter that's

at fault it's the user that's at fault

that's basically section 230 in a very

simple recap and I'm trying to recap all

of this because I really want to keep it

simple for you because I want to get to

where I think the weak part of this is

so let me make sure I haven't missed

anything here so uh Twitter is arguing

that if they don't submit their uh

essential statement on content

moderation then they're going to be

faced with Draconian fines up to fifteen

thousand dollars in violation per day

they complain that ab587 imposes

tremendously burdensome requirements on

social media companies requiring them to

keep records about potentially hundreds

of millions of content moderation

decisions made on a daily basis and it

wouldn't be fair to require newspapers

to outline how they should reply to

editorial pieces because that would take

away the editorial freedom of newspapers

and these are just the arguments that

they're stitching together now what I'd

like to do is go back to the first page

of the actual complaint once we get past

the uh The Heading letter which

basically Elon Musk hired four probably

expensive attorneys Mr kutzabug and

Abrams and Ross Brook and Cole out of

New York who are going to be working Pro

hakoviche in California under the uh

stewardship of uh attorneys Warren and

Baker

anyway that's just the first page so the

real first page where the meat of the

matter is over here

I think there is a big weakness and I

don't know if they're just expecting the

judge to roll on this or the attorney

general not to understand it but if they

watch this video they're going to see

the weakness

and I'm going to explain it to you right

after I mentioned that did you know you

can now get licensed Financial advice

from myself and the team all you have to

do is go to snackhack.com check it out

before prices go up and keep this in

mind we are expecting to combine all of

the courses into something new called

The Profit portal that means the entry

price into the courses is going to be a

lot more expensive

so if you want to get the best price on

the courses Now's the Time to do it we

expect the bundle where everything's all

in one to launch on the 15th and the

total price is going to be more we

expect it to be greater than what you

could get Now by bundling up for the

courses or emailing us if you'd like

your custom bundle at staff meet

kevin.com so basically if you want to

make sure you get lifetime access to

those course member live streams updates

from me q a with me personal uh

perspective from me on Building Wealth

and real estate stocks or making more

money make sure to check out those

programs and building your wealth link

down below for next Friday okay so

what's the weakness and why do I think

elon's being a weenie baby here all

right first of all remember how Elon

when he bought Twitter he's like we're

going to have transparent content

moderation

bro you are literally now filing a

lawsuit complaining about how you need

to have transparent content moderation

fact case and point in your very own

complaint

that you wrote your attorneys wrote in

the first paragraph you say we are

basically upset that we have to provide

a terms of service report that includes

our content moderation policy and

keywords here information about weather

and if how so the social media company

defines and moderates hate speech

okay but wait a minute information about

weather and if

well here's a simple one Elon all you

have to do is put your terms of Services

report together and say look we moderate

where the law says we need to but beyond

that we actually don't Define these

things and we don't moderate these

things all California wants to know is

your stance now obviously I'm not an

attorney even though we have an in-house

legal counsel who sent me these uh all

of these documents and the exhibits and

I've been going through reading these on

my flight back from NorCal

my opinion as not an attorney here my

opinion is that Elon is probably trying

to skirt the requirement to post his

terms of services because he's trying to

do two things number one he's trying to

delay posting the terms of services

because they don't have the staff yet to

review the complaints and actually

manage the terms of services that they

would post because they fired too many

people

second thing is they might get backlash

if they indicate at all yeah look we

have to moderate where the law is and

then they're going to get backlash from

their base which has definitely started

leaning a little bit more to the right

so the next thing is if Elon can push

this up to the Supreme Court of the

United States and argue hey look here I

am I'm Elon I'm fighting

quote unquote the left arms of

California

then it makes him again appeal to his

base right that's basically what his

base has become and I'm trying to

present this as as neutral as far as

possible you might not know hopefully

you know because I ran for governor in

California I call myself a 59 uh or

sorry 49 51 JFK style Democrat which

means I really try to look at everything

from a middle non-bias point of view and

quite frankly I believe that Elon is

extremely stressed I think that Elon has

seen his ad Revenue declines 60 which he

himself disclosed he's blaming anything

and everyone that he can he doesn't have

the staff to moderate even the stuff he

has to by law he doesn't want to put

together terms of service report because

it's going to piss people off even

though it's not that big of a deal just

say you don't have to or or you don't as

a company to find these things it

literally you wrote it yourself if you

do disclose how you define well then

just say you don't

so maybe there's more to it and maybe I

need to go deeper into this

and that's why I'm making this video

because I really am curious about your

opinion about this am I being too

anti-elon here keep in mind like my ETF

is heavy in Tesla I'm a big Elon fan I

hope to get starlink on this jet one day

I'm a big Elon fan I think what he's

doing is great but I think he's being a

little bit of a weenie baby here and

again I want to read this to you one

last time just so you can really think

about it when you leave a comment I'm

going to read you word for word they're

they're section two here

ab587 requires large social media

companies like x-corp to post terms of

service dictated by the government and

include terms about how content is

moderated on their platforms the terms

of service requirement and submit on a

semi-annual basis to the California

attorney general a terms of service

report that includes among other things

a detailed description of content

moderation practices used by the social

media company for that platform B that

was a b information about weather and if

so how

the social media company defines and

moderates hates feature racism extremism

radicalization disinformation or

misinformation harassment and foreign

policy interference as well as

information and statistics about actions

taken by the social media company to

moderate these categories of content

well my simple thing here is our content

moderation policy is we moderate what

the law is and we'll respond to the

requests for moderation within 30 days

whatever they have a problem with that

let them comment well we want it to be

14 days and do we have a policy on hate

speech racism nope

just whatever the law is leave it there

so I don't know this lawsuit feels weeny

I almost wonder if these attorneys

especially since four of them are from

New York are like hey you want to do a

lawsuit against California we'll do it

all on contingency like basically uh you

know sign us up with an attorney in

California we'll do it all from New York

we'll do all the work and we just want

to get the pr you'll get the pr benefit

of basically complaining about

California which is really popular to do

in the rest of the country and you don't

even have to pay anything because well

you guys don't have any money anyway

because you guys are losing money hand

over fist I don't know again maybe maybe

I'm reading is totally wrong but that's

my opinion curious to hear what your

opinion is leave a comment link down

below make sure to check out stack hack

by going to stackhack.com for licensed

Financial advice and meet kevin.com for

those courses I'm building your wealth

see you soon thanks bye