TRANSCRIPTEnglish

CRAP - First HARD DATA "Rolls Over" -- BAD NEWS.

23m 46s4,297 words633 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

drama is back in focus today with the

0:02

NASDAQ selling off. But honestly, no

0:03

matter when you watch these videos, the

0:05

market's either going to be up or down.

0:06

What matters more is what's going on

0:09

with tariffs. What is the latest update?

0:10

And what's going on with that Atlanta

0:12

Fed GDP measure? Because the last GDP

0:14

measure we got from the Atlanta Fed was

0:16

in that negative 2.4% range. However,

0:19

the Atlanta Fed provided a note on Laton

0:21

of all places suggesting that the

0:25

adjusted Atlanta Fed model was probably

0:28

closer to

0:30

04%. But even 4% is a substantial right

0:33

down from where we had been previously,

0:36

which was well over 2 and a half to even

0:38

3% uh towards uh you know the early

0:41

portion of the year. In fact, you could

0:43

see that right here. Well, the Atlanta

0:45

Fed after the durable data released this

0:47

morning came out with a new update and

0:49

the current update released today, March

0:51

26th, uh, is that GDP is growing at

0:54

negative

0:56

1.8%. However, the Atlanta Fed is now

0:59

providing a gold adjusted GDP now uh,

1:05

report and they provide why they are

1:08

providing all of these updates. if you

1:10

really care to read all their formulas

1:12

and all this junk over here. They had a

1:14

really good LinkedIn summary of this,

1:15

but basically when they

1:17

remove, you know, gold and sort of

1:19

adjust for these rapid changes in gold

1:23

imports and exports that are going on,

1:25

you actually get a GDP now forecast

1:28

which probably more closely aligns with

1:30

actual GDP of around.2%.

1:35

Well, I don't know about you, but if our

1:37

GDP is only growing at 02%. That's

1:40

pretty damn miserable. That is very low.

1:43

And I'll tell you why it's very bad. In

1:47

2007, we were told that GDP was growing

1:51

at.7%. Everything was fine.

1:55

But what ended up happening is about a

1:57

year later they revised your GDP down

2:01

over one percentage point and you

2:03

actually had negative GDP and oh my gosh

2:06

you were actually in a recession the

2:08

whole time. So this makes it possible

2:10

that we already are in a recession. We

2:13

just don't recognize it yet. Now you

2:15

have people like Kathy Wood say it's

2:17

just a rolling recession. But this GDP

2:19

estimate, even gold adjusted, is a

2:22

little bit of a slap in the face to some

2:23

of the uncertainties that are

2:25

essentially being caused, at least in

2:27

some part, I'm not saying Trump is

2:28

entirely responsible, but at least in

2:30

some part being caused by these this

2:31

Trump tariff uncertainty. We saw that

2:34

actually in the durable data this

2:35

morning. And there's some nuance to the

2:38

data. And so I want to explain some of

2:40

that data a little bit because it does

2:42

get complicated uh and uh it's worth

2:45

just breaking it down.

2:46

Today was the first day we actually had

2:48

a bit of a real data hit. So far, we've

2:52

had hits because of soft data, but now

2:55

we're actually starting to have some

2:56

real hard data hits. And how are we

2:59

seeing it? Well, we're seeing it when

3:00

you actually look very closely at the

3:02

data. First, this morning, durables

3:04

data, like durable goods like washing

3:06

machines and cars, even Xcars, that

3:08

actually beat for the preliminary read

3:10

for February. So in other words, people

3:12

still bought more of these goods in

3:15

February than economists expected.

3:17

Economists expected, you know, negative

3:19

1% actually I think negative.1% or 1%.

3:22

Either way, they expected a negative

3:23

read. Uh and we ended up getting a

3:25

positive.9% read. So obviously a little

3:28

bit better on the durables data. Okay.

3:31

So where's the bad news in this Kevin?

3:33

Well, it's capital good orders. See,

3:36

durables and a shipments are things that

3:40

have already either been paid for or

3:42

already being bought. Orders are a

3:45

little interesting because

3:46

orders are something that could still be

3:49

cancelled or uh it could be a sort of a

3:52

more of a future read. In other words,

3:55

there's a delay between a capital goods

3:57

order and a capital goods shipment. For

3:59

example, shipments beat also 0.9 versus2

4:03

expected. So, you're getting a beat on

4:05

shipments for February, but what about

4:07

orders? Some a little bit more of a

4:09

leading hard data read. Well, capital

4:13

good orders missed. They came in at.3

4:16

versus2% expected. So, all these numbers

4:20

can get really confusing, but let's put

4:21

a little bottom line on that. What's

4:24

happening is businesses are actually

4:27

starting to say, you know what, let's

4:30

wait. Now, I've warned about this

4:32

before. I've warned and it's my

4:34

unpopular opinion that companies are

4:35

going to substantially delay their

4:37

massive Trump kneebending capital

4:39

expenditures because they could be

4:41

truthful and say they're going to invest

4:43

all this money over the next four years,

4:45

but then they could also be a little sly

4:47

about that or slick about it and say and

4:50

we'll start that project in two years

4:52

when we're in the deep dark recession

4:54

and it's cheaper for us to build that

4:56

factory then or we don't build the

4:58

factory at all and we U-turn on it

5:00

without committing to anything up front

5:02

other and you know, getting the pleasure

5:04

of Donald Trump exempting you from

5:05

tariffs because you're like, $500

5:07

billion coming your way,

5:10

master. And then when the circumstances

5:12

change, you're like, you know, just

5:14

kidding. Um, we're in a recession. We

5:16

ain't doing that.

5:19

Uh, in which case, Donald Trump would

5:21

have way less leverage to to punish you

5:24

back anyway because the economy would be

5:26

weaker and he sort of needs you anyway.

5:28

Hey, quick house hack pitch. Here we go.

5:30

Minute 45. Then back to the data.

5:33

$171,000 of of wedge value we made.

5:36

Didn't pay a dime of taxes on it because

5:38

we bought a house for

5:40

$57,000 that's worth about $760 right

5:43

now. And it looked like nasty. Who was

5:45

going to live in that? No soul is going

5:48

to live in this. It's disgusting. It's

5:50

like rot and feces and nasty. It's

5:54

disgusting. You know, and the house act

5:56

comes along and makes it beautiful

5:58

again. and and just remodels and

6:01

renovates everything. So, we get paid

6:03

money for

6:04

that. And the more people invest in our

6:07

5% bond, which we just doubled the

6:10

people investing in our bond over the

6:12

last week, which is crazy. I think

6:14

people are diversifying from the stock

6:16

market. You could be a nonacredited

6:17

investor now, too. You get a 5% yield.

6:20

You get upside if our valuation goes up.

6:24

Uh you get 100% of the upside. You get

6:27

5% per year. And we buy, fix, build, and

6:31

manage the real estate for you. And we

6:33

do it in a transparent manner.

6:34

Transparent manner. All of the

6:36

properties are are listed. Like that's

6:38

our building. That's our house. Like

6:40

these are our properties. You can see

6:41

them all over at househack.com. It's

6:43

kind of cool. So I encourage you to

6:45

check that out. Househack.com. At least

6:47

think about like people ask me like

6:48

Kevin, well, you know, what's the

6:49

deadline to invest? We're not trying to

6:51

pressure anybody to invest right now.

6:53

Like if it's good for you as a

6:55

diversifier, do it. uh you know that's

6:58

your personal decision. Read all the

7:00

information about it, the circulars and

7:02

preps or whatever. But we see it as the

7:04

sooner you invest, the sooner you a

7:05

diversify and b get a 5% yield, which is

7:10

kind of cool because you get both the

7:12

upside of private equity stock downside

7:14

protection uh and and the yield. But I

7:17

mean really, if you think about it, to

7:19

sum you up on my pop unpopular opinion

7:22

video that I made, why would you build a

7:24

factory in the United States only to

7:26

return to free trade at some point in

7:28

the future and then all of a sudden you

7:30

were absolutely uncompetitive? You are

7:32

probably the most uncompetitive factory

7:34

that you could have possibly built. You

7:36

really need government grants to make

7:38

you competitive again. Otherwise, it

7:40

won't be a sustainable US worker job.

7:43

It'll temporarily be sustainable, but

7:45

then guess what

7:46

happens? You end up going like that

7:48

company goes bankrupt or that factory or

7:51

facility or whatever it is gets shut

7:52

down because you just end up outsourcing

7:55

back to a globalist economy

7:57

again. That was my opinion. But then I

8:00

read an economist piece this morning and

8:03

the piece almost reads like I wrote it,

8:05

which is a problem because I I don't I

8:07

don't want to sound biased in this uh

8:09

but uh I just want you to see it

8:11

yourself. So here it is. The economist.

8:14

This is a screenshot from him. The chill

8:16

that extends beyond the manufacturing

8:19

industry. Okay. So now this is

8:21

interesting. The chill that extends

8:23

beyond the manufacturing industry. Okay.

8:26

David French of the National Retail

8:28

Foundation or Federation notes his

8:30

members would like to nail down their

8:31

sourcing arrangements. Can they rely on

8:33

production networks that run through

8:35

Mexico or factories in or factories in

8:38

Southeast Asia a safer bet? Purchasing

8:40

managers do not want to make rash moves

8:42

until the dust settles on new tariff on

8:44

the new tariff landscape, whatever it

8:45

may be. And the uncertainty is delaying

8:47

other investment decisions as well.

8:50

Tariffs on building materials and

8:51

consumer goods add uncertainty to

8:53

opening new store, Mr. French says. But

8:56

companies know how to flatter the

8:58

president. Many of their announcements

8:59

concerning spending plans uh were

9:03

already in train before Donald Trump

9:05

took office, the economist here says.

9:07

Moreover, every for every announced

9:09

deal, others are languishing. Recent

9:12

recent surveys from the Federal Reserve

9:13

branches in New York and Philadelphia

9:15

registered sharp declines in

9:16

manufacturers outlook for the economy

9:18

over the next year and a half. This is

9:20

basically where they're saying while

9:22

Trump is announcing all of these deals,

9:23

a lot of them may have already been in

9:25

the works anyway. We're not talking

9:27

about all the deals that are getting

9:28

cancelled. Like in a moment, we're going

9:30

to talk about how Microsoft is

9:31

cancelling even more data centers

9:34

uh than than the first time we heard the

9:36

story.

9:37

So now this is really interesting

9:39

because The Economist is now doubling

9:41

down on this argument and they just

9:43

wrote this piece. But this unpopular

9:45

opinion that I made a few weeks ago,

9:46

it's starting to sound very familiar.

9:48

Starting to sound like I wrote this. I

9:51

didn't. I swear. Uh but it sort of makes

9:54

it seem clear that other companies and

9:58

economists are saying the same thing

9:59

that yeah, why would we invest right

10:02

now? Why don't we just wait? And that

10:04

could probably reiterate why these

10:06

tariffs are so damaging. You know,

10:08

Bloomberg Intelligence actually had a

10:09

really interesting piece on software

10:11

this morning where they suggested that

10:14

uh you know, only a fraction of the

10:17

federal government's software spending

10:20

uh is is or the federal government

10:23

software spending only represents a

10:24

fraction of all software spending in the

10:27

United States. But when you lump all of

10:31

the downstream effects together of what

10:33

the government is responsible for, like

10:35

one department using software to then

10:37

allocate funding to universities who

10:40

then have their own software, you could

10:41

potentially argue that up to 40% of the

10:45

app software market is exposed to

10:48

government cuts, which is really bad for

10:51

software businesses because now you're

10:52

talking about negative licensing seeds,

10:55

negative growth on software companies

10:57

that already have pretty rich

10:58

valuations. Not great. Donald Trump also

11:01

talked about auto tariffs coming as soon

11:02

as today, copper tariffs coming,

11:05

potentially fewer exceptions now than

11:07

expected. I mean, Trump is kind of the

11:08

definition of an actual flip-flopper.

11:11

You know, one day

11:13

it's, you know, April 2nd is going to be

11:15

Liberation Day. We're going to have the

11:18

largest tariffs we've ever seen. The

11:20

next day is, yeah, we're there going to

11:21

be a lot of exceptions. You know, some

11:23

countries won't have any tariffs at all,

11:25

and a lot of companies won't have any

11:26

tariffs at all. Oh, by the way, look at

11:28

Hyundai. They're announcing a factory,

11:30

and yay, they're going to be exempt from

11:32

tariffs. Good boy, Hyundai. And then

11:35

today, it's Yeah, we're actually going

11:37

to have a lot fewer exceptions than we

11:39

expected. So, guess what that means? Oh,

11:43

stock market down. Oh, wow. Even just in

11:47

the time that I've been yapping here,

11:48

it's u it's falling even more.

11:52

1.96% on the cues. Tesla down uh what is

11:56

this? 6.6%. You know, this morning we

12:00

were playing with these lines a little

12:01

bit on the alpha report. I suggested if

12:04

we were to go down at the open, we would

12:05

go down to 489 in the alpha report. It's

12:08

exactly what happened. Uh now, we broke

12:11

that line as well. And now we're just

12:13

off a cliff. We'll have to see where the

12:15

next stop here is. Uh, I didn't think it

12:17

would be a full 3% to get us down to

12:19

479, but boy, now it feels like we're

12:21

bleeding to that direction. We're down

12:23

2%. I don't know. Uh, and then on Tesla,

12:26

I thought, uh, you know, we would end up

12:28

coming hit to hit 274 uh, in a down

12:31

scenario, which we did, and then got

12:33

rejected by it. As we're getting

12:35

rejected by it, we ended up losing even

12:37

the 271 soft line, which puts 260 back

12:40

in play for Tesla. A little challenging

12:44

here. Uh but anyway, that's just some of

12:46

the TA that we talk about in the course

12:47

member live streams or the alpha report,

12:49

which remember you can get those over at

12:51

weekaven.com. So now all of a sudden,

12:54

you're seeing some of the hard data

12:55

start to roll over. Remember, a lot of

12:57

this is still February data. The fact

12:59

that we're seeing orders weakening in

13:01

the face of more of these uncertainties

13:03

is problematic. Now, the economist

13:05

suggests we only have about a 25% risk

13:08

of recession, that we're not in a

13:09

recession right now. Again, people

13:11

dispute whether or not we're in a

13:12

recession right now or not, but it's

13:14

really clear that growth is slowing.

13:16

You've even got Fed uh you know, Fed

13:18

member from I think it's the St. Louis

13:20

Fred uh Muslim. No, St. Louis, isn't

13:23

that? Yeah. No, St. Louis. They were St.

13:25

Louis growth does appear to have slowed

13:28

probably because businesses and people

13:30

are worried, you know, worried about,

13:32

you know, tariff impact and Qashqari

13:34

reiterated that this morning as well.

13:36

Alo, a lot of Fed speak, this talk about

13:37

tariffs or a threat uh that grows the

13:40

longer it affects confidence. So, in

13:42

other words, if we just U-turned on all

13:44

tariffs right now, maybe we could go

13:46

back up. But if we keep doing this, no

13:48

tariffs, lots of tariffs, the most

13:51

tariffs ever, fewer tariffs, more

13:53

tariffs, all you're really doing is just

13:56

destroying GDP growth because

13:59

everybody's like, "Let's just wait.

14:00

People aren't going to buy machinery." I

14:02

mean, like, if I was a business owner

14:03

right now, thinking, "Okay, I'm going to

14:06

I'm going to sit here and let's say I'm

14:09

a a kitchen carpenter, okay? Because

14:12

that's what my father was, uh, and a

14:14

kitchen designer, and I need to decide,

14:18

do I want to buy a new CNC for my uh,

14:21

warehouse?" You know, uh, I probably

14:26

wouldn't make that purchasing decision

14:27

right now. say,

14:29

"Well, I'll decide in six months and I

14:34

could still take the tax deduction this

14:37

year as long as I do it before December

14:39

31st. Why would I make that decision in

14:41

March? I'll just

14:43

wait." That doesn't mean you're bearish

14:46

on your business. It just means you're

14:48

like, "Ah, I'll just make do for a

14:50

little while longer." But if everybody

14:52

starts doing that, that's why you get

14:55

the Atlanta Fed GDP so negative and and

14:57

how dangerous it is, how rapidly you

14:59

could really screw up the economy. Now,

15:02

of course, the Trump administration

15:03

suggests that this is just a detox

15:05

period. Fine. But I'll tell you, if we

15:07

go into a deep dirty recession, you're

15:09

going to

15:10

have detoxes is going to feel like a

15:13

depression because so many people will

15:14

lose their jobs. So far though, no big

15:17

layoffs yet. Hopefully that keeps going.

15:19

Maybe that's because corporate balance

15:20

sheets are so strong and they are. The

15:24

biggest companies are the most

15:26

profitable and most

15:28

cashrich compared to any time in

15:32

history which is good because it creates

15:34

an insulative blanket. The question is

15:36

when when do we pierce that insulated

15:38

blanket and consider that what is it 45%

15:42

somewhere around 45% of jobs in the

15:44

United States come from small

15:45

businesses. Now, Bloomberg suggests

15:47

that, oh, well, the sales recession's

15:50

already been priced into the Russell

15:51

2000 small caps. Okay, now we're going

15:54

to call it a sales recession, not an

15:56

actual recession. It's not an actual

15:58

recession. It's just a sales

15:59

recession. Whatever. I don't know if I

16:02

buy that. So, I'm a little concerned

16:04

about that.

16:06

And

16:07

so I think it was Barclays this morning

16:09

that said we're kind of like in a

16:11

roarshack economy right now where if you

16:13

hold up, you know, Roshchack test, like

16:15

the ink blotss, they hold it up and

16:16

they're like, "What do you see?" One

16:17

person's like, "I see a dog." One

16:19

person's like, "I see a house and a

16:20

million dollars of cash." People like,

16:22

"All right, well, I thought we were on

16:25

animals, but I guess we're talking about

16:27

something totally different." So Barlays

16:30

says this because there's so much data

16:32

for both bulls and bears.

16:34

This morning in the alpha report, I

16:36

actually called this market the

16:37

checkerboard market where it's sort of

16:39

like there's so much white and black or,

16:42

you know, red and white or whatever

16:43

colors you want to use. It's sort of

16:44

like, yeah, I mean, there's there's that

16:46

all over the freaking place yet. You

16:48

just don't have a clear board. So, we

16:50

don't know. We don't know who's winning

16:51

right now. Mel, though, I'll give you an

16:54

update on the um the bull bear

16:58

scale. Technically, by the way, that is

17:00

the bear bull scale. And so the bearbull

17:04

scale right now uh for me sits at about

17:07

29. Now I have to be careful because

17:09

there are people that just don't

17:10

understand nuance in the comments and

17:12

they're like, "Oh, one day Kevin's

17:14

bullish, one day Kevin's bearish." You

17:15

know, that's not true. It's not a light

17:17

switch. And I try to be like the reason

17:19

I created the bare bull scale and I try

17:20

to be so transparent with everything

17:22

that I'm responding to is because

17:24

there's so much nuance involved. You

17:26

know, I've been sitting two and a half

17:28

for quite a while now. probably couple

17:30

months here since probably about midFeb

17:33

I turned under five so bearish back you

17:36

know in June of last year it was more

17:38

like July of last year mid July of last

17:40

year we went under five so went more

17:42

bearish

17:44

uh and and then we've we've been

17:45

bouncing around this sort of like 2 and

17:47

1 half to 4 and a.5% uh number range

17:50

based on data so you know last week I'm

17:54

two and a half then we get you know

17:56

really good data on Monday we actually

17:57

did get good data on Monday and a

17:59

softening of the tariffs that we heard

18:00

about on Friday. And I'm like, okay, you

18:02

know, maybe we're

18:03

32. Then we get some mixed data again

18:06

this morning. I'm like, h, we're we are

18:08

still bobbing around that three level,

18:10

but I'm sitting around a 29, right? So,

18:12

I'm kind of taking this data and sort of

18:14

adjusting where I am. And and all the

18:16

data I look at just keeps pushing me

18:18

closer and closer to the bare side. You

18:20

know, 29 is pretty bearish. It's not

18:22

like sell everything bearish, but I

18:25

don't like the Atlanta Feds sitting

18:26

close to zero because that's just going

18:28

to get revised negative just like what

18:30

happened historically. You know, I don't

18:32

think this time is different. I like

18:33

looking at history and in in prior

18:36

recessions, we usually revise down into

18:38

a

18:39

recession. So, that's why I lean more on

18:42

the bearish side. Uh, and and I can't

18:44

wait to be Mr. Buy the dip again. But

18:45

the thing is, it's it's I feel like I

18:47

always lose because if as soon as I turn

18:50

bearish or as soon as I turn bullish

18:52

again, everybody's going to be so jaded

18:54

about stocks. Like I think it was the

18:56

Barclays this morning, they're like,

18:58

"Oh, you know, stocks sold off, so now

19:00

they're reasonably valued." And I'm

19:04

like, 5% off all-time highs now makes

19:07

them reasonably valued. Okay, let's

19:09

agree to disagree for a moment that

19:11

they're reasonably valued. How about

19:13

this? I don't want to buy reasonably

19:16

valued stocks. I want to buy undervalued

19:18

stocks. I want to buy the cheapest,

19:21

dirtiest stocks that you could buy at a

19:24

massive discount. I want Restoration

19:27

Hardware all over my face. I want

19:29

Restoration Hardware. Why? Because I

19:32

actually think it's going to fall even

19:33

more, but they're trading for like a

19:35

half peg right now. We did a full

19:37

analysis on them and I'm going to keep

19:39

analyzing them. They're getting price

19:41

cut like crazy by Wall Street analysts.

19:43

Like Guggenheim cuts the price. Great.

19:46

The more these these analysts cut the

19:48

price targets, the happier I am. I

19:51

cannot wait to buy Restoration Hardware

19:53

stock at at a discount. It already is at

19:55

a huge discount, but I want even more. I

19:56

want a bloody discount. That's what I

19:58

want. It's kind of like what we do with

20:00

House Hack. I want deals that are so

20:04

nasty that nobody wants to buy them and

20:07

then we can get really fat wedges on

20:09

them. Look at this.

20:12

$171,000 of of wedge value we made.

20:15

Didn't pay a dime of taxes on it because

20:17

we bought a house for

20:19

$57,000. That's worth about $760 right

20:21

now. And it looked like nasty. Who wants

20:24

Who's going to live in that? No soul is

20:26

going to live in this. It's disgusting.

20:29

It's like rot and feces and nasty. It's

20:33

disgusting, you know. when the house act

20:35

comes along and makes it beautiful

20:37

again and and just remodels and

20:40

renovates everything. So, we get paid

20:42

money for

20:43

that. And the more people invest in our

20:46

5% bond, which we just doubled the

20:49

people investing in our bond over the

20:51

last week, which is crazy. I think

20:53

people are diversifying from the stock

20:54

market. You could be a nonacredited

20:56

investor now, too. You get a 5% yield.

20:59

You get upside if our valuation goes up.

21:03

uh you get 100% of the upside, you get

21:06

5% per year and we buy, fix, build and

21:09

manage the real estate for you and we do

21:11

it in a transparent manner transparent

21:13

manner. All of the properties are are

21:16

listed like that's our building. That's

21:18

our house. Like these are our

21:19

properties. You can see them all over at

21:20

househack.com. It's kind of cool. So I

21:23

encourage you to check that out.

21:24

Househack.com. At least think about like

21:26

people ask me like Kevin, well you know

21:27

what's the deadline to invest? We're not

21:30

trying to pressure anybody to invest

21:31

right now. like if it's good for you as

21:33

a diversifier, do it. Uh, you know,

21:36

that's your personal decision. Read all

21:39

the information about it, the circulars

21:40

and PPMs or whatever. But we see it as

21:42

the sooner you invest, the sooner you a

21:44

diversify and b get a 5% yield, which is

21:48

kind of cool because you get both the

21:51

upside of private equity stock, downside

21:53

protection, uh, and and the yield. I

21:56

think it's awesome. So, uh, okay. So,

22:00

this gives me uh this is sort of a bit

22:02

of my

22:03

thought on uh what's going on with

22:06

tariffs and the economy and the bull

22:08

bear scale. I'm not I'm just not ready

22:12

to to get in there and say, "Oh, I want

22:13

to buy everything." See, Barclays wrote,

22:15

"Making sense of it all. US equity

22:17

markets are more reasonably valued after

22:19

the pullback." Well, honestly, like part

22:21

of that is redundant. Like, no duh. If

22:25

something's at $100 and then it drops to

22:29

$95, congratulations, Sherlock. It's

22:32

more reasonably valued. Like, you didn't

22:35

really tell us anything. So, I feel like

22:37

even Wall Street people are really,

22:40

really

22:41

confused. And I think that's why you're

22:43

getting some of the risk shaving that

22:46

we've seen. Uh, where you get this

22:50

environment of, okay, we got a bit of a

22:53

bounce again. Let's use that as an

22:55

opportunity to take some risk off the

22:56

table again. And uh and this is this is

23:01

a feature of recessions, recessionary

23:04

environments where you get these really

23:06

volatile, oh the worst is over, the

23:08

correction's over, you know, buy the

23:10

dip, buy the dip, and and it all comes

23:12

up, but then people are like, cool, that

23:15

was

23:16

fun. Take my money

23:19

now. Uh so we'll see. But uh that's my

23:23

take on uh on tariffs, the Fed uh and

23:26

the economy this morning. Why not

23:28

advertise these things that you told us

23:30

here? I feel like nobody else knows

23:31

about this. We'll we'll try a little

23:32

advertising and see how it goes.

23:34

Congratulations, man. You have done so

23:35

much. People love you. People look up to

23:37

you. Kevin Praath there, financial

23:39

analyst and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always

23:41

great to get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.