TRANSCRIPTEnglish

**Massive Stock Market Short Squeeze**

27m 11s4,858 words698 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Holy smokes, are we back and is it time

0:02

to buy the dip? In this video, we're

0:05

going to go through exactly whether or

0:07

not we are back and whether or not it is

0:09

time to buy the dip. Spoiler alert,

0:12

every single dip this year has been a

0:16

buy the dip opportunity. I kid you not.

0:19

Liberation over here. And I remember,

0:22

you see this double dip right here at

0:24

the end of April. I made videos going,

0:26

"Folks, set trailing stops. Don't be

0:29

dumping right now because we might be

0:32

about to rocket ship up and trailing

0:34

stops would be the perfect way because

0:36

you'll never get stopped out if you're

0:38

on this kind of run. And people at the

0:40

time are like, Kevin, you're just making

0:42

videos to try to hed your bets and cover

0:44

both sides. Like, no. Here's the

0:46

evidence as to why we're saying this.

0:48

Okay, that was then. You can watch the

0:50

videos that are there. But take a look

0:51

at this. Every single dip has been

0:54

bought so far. So, the dip we had at the

0:56

end of July, super minor. The dip we had

0:59

in September, super minor. The October

1:01

dip, super minor. This November dip has

1:04

been a little bit more frustrating

1:05

because it's been about 3 weeks. You

1:07

know, we're about 3 weeks of like down

1:09

right before Halloween. We started, we

1:11

hit all-time highs right before

1:12

Halloween and then it's been down, down,

1:14

down, down, down. Why has it been down?

1:16

It's been fear because of the AI bubble.

1:18

It's been fear because of private credit

1:22

and liquidity stress. And these are all

1:24

reasonable fears. In fact, I have to say

1:27

the thing that makes me the most nervous

1:29

right now is what I'm seeing with AI

1:33

spending in the bond market. In fact,

1:36

take a look at this chart right here.

1:38

This chart is disgusting. So, this is a

1:41

pretty busy chart cuz I wrote all over

1:42

it. I apologize. Just ignore the text

1:44

for a moment. Look at the little red

1:46

lines. So, the red lines show you bond

1:48

issuance. Okay? So, on the left side

1:50

over here, I have 20. So, $20 billion of

1:53

bond issuance. And you can see it's kind

1:55

of rare, you know, after 2020 that you

1:57

see these lines, but they pop up. This

1:59

arrow right here shows you the chat GPT

2:02

moment. And you basically had no debt

2:05

financing for over a year after that

2:07

chat GPT moment. And then in 2024, like

2:11

the second half of 2024, you started

2:13

seeing, you know, a couple 20 billion

2:15

deals, a 20 billion, maybe a 12 billion

2:17

deal, a little bit at the beginning of

2:18

2025, right? But now, what are we seeing

2:21

over here? Every month, boom, boom,

2:24

boom. And you total it up, it's actually

2:27

$88 billion of debt financing on the

2:31

right side. So, it's no surprise that

2:33

you're seeing credit default swaps get

2:35

more expensive for Meta and Oracle

2:37

because people are like, man, dude,

2:39

we're all of a sudden taking on a whole

2:41

lot more debt than we used to. Because

2:44

any single one of these lines on the

2:46

right is more debt financing for AI than

2:49

we've had at any of these other lines on

2:51

the left. Maybe with the exception of

2:53

just that one right there, but basically

2:55

you've got three of these sandwiched in

2:58

a row on the right side. And it's really

3:00

indicative of wo why all of a sudden are

3:04

we taking on so much debt? So I wrote a

3:07

few notes here. I wrote, "Right now,

3:10

we're at the phase of the economy where

3:12

as long as debt issuance continues, we

3:16

can keep this growth going. And that's

3:19

good and it's bad. It's good because it

3:21

means for right now, it doesn't

3:23

necessarily mean we have to roll over.

3:26

It just means like, hey, like that's a

3:28

whole lot of debt." I mean, I think

3:30

Bucko over here, literally Bucko Capital

3:33

Bloke, writes, "David's saying the quiet

3:35

part out loud. This administration has

3:38

made some catastrophically bad economic

3:40

decisions and he's right. They backed

3:42

themselves into a corner and cannot

3:44

afford to go backwards on AI. This is in

3:47

response to a David Saxs tweet which

3:49

says, "According to today's Wall Street

3:51

Journal, AI related investment accounts

3:54

for half of GDP growth. A reversal would

3:57

risk recession. We cannot afford to go

4:00

backwards." Full article. In other

4:02

words, if as like if we stop seeing this

4:07

AI spending, we could end up seeing a

4:10

recession right here. A reversal could

4:12

risk a recession. Okay, great. But if

4:16

we're relying on AI for not going into a

4:21

recession, then what we're really saying

4:24

is we're relying on debt. Because in the

4:27

last 3 months, all of this AI boom has

4:30

been funded by debt. And that's really

4:33

scary because Ray Dallio put it really

4:35

well. He did this like 10-minute segment

4:37

with CNBC. I'm going to save you the

4:38

time. Okay. Basically, the last like 30

4:41

seconds are all that matters. And he's

4:42

like, "Well, you know, uh yeah, we're

4:44

definitely in a bubble, but uh you know

4:46

what it takes to uh make a bubble popup?

4:49

You got to prick it. And you know what

4:51

pricks the bubble pop? People dashing

4:53

for cash. I I can't do a Ray Dalio

4:56

accent, but basically when people need

4:58

cash, that's when the bubble pops. Okay.

5:00

Well, what is that? Nobody knows. But

5:03

what we know is what I wrote on this

5:05

chart, which is that debt issuance is

5:08

going extreme right now. That's not

5:10

necessarily to say it's going to stop,

5:12

but we're starting to see that

5:14

nervousness, right? We're seeing that

5:15

nervousness with Blue Owl. Blue Owl is

5:18

like freaking out. Look at what's

5:19

happening with the private credit

5:20

companies. Blue Owl backed the $30

5:22

billion Meta deal, which I thought was

5:24

brilliant. Like if you want exposure to

5:26

the AI, you know, boom, without like

5:30

with getting a good valuation, in my

5:32

opinion, Meta's at a good valuation, and

5:34

you don't as want as much of the debt

5:35

risk, Meta is really interesting because

5:37

they just financed a $30 billion deal

5:40

where they have the opportunity to

5:41

cancel their leases every four years and

5:44

pay like a nominal early termination

5:45

fee. Guess who holds the bag? Blue Owl.

5:48

Guess out of these private credit funds,

5:51

which is performing the worst? Blue Owl.

5:54

You know, it's down like almost half. It

5:57

stock is almost h haveved in value. The

5:59

only thing that's doing slightly worse

6:01

than Blue Owl in the credit uh in the

6:03

private credit space right now is well

6:07

uh Grinder. Grinder. I guess Grinder is

6:10

not really in the private credit credit

6:11

space, but what I should say is what is

6:13

doing worse than Blue Owl is Grinder.

6:15

Grinder has probably the smallest PP

6:17

right now. little pee pe.

6:19

>> And that's because their executives are

6:21

literally getting margin called because

6:23

they leveraged up their own personal

6:25

shares. And so their personal shares are

6:27

getting revoked. They're getting seized

6:29

and they're getting liquidated. So, who

6:31

knows? Maybe there's an opportunity to

6:33

buy the shrink on uh Grinder. But that's

6:36

probably a topic for a different video.

6:38

Maybe even a different channel that's

6:40

like only meet Kevin or something. But

6:42

anyway, I mean private credit's

6:44

obviously an issue, right? We see the

6:45

private thericolor collapse is right

6:47

here. We actually topped after

6:49

thericolor uh collapse. First brands

6:52

collapse is here. The crypto1010

6:54

liquidation is here. And then of course

6:55

we have multiple other liquidations

6:58

following that. Now of course the CEOs

7:00

and the executives at these companies,

7:02

they don't want you to think that there

7:04

are any kind of issues or cockroaches.

7:07

Uh, in fact, you literally have the Blue

7:09

Owl CEO saying, quote, "The point being

7:12

like somehow by just talking about this

7:15

enough, people have worked themselves

7:17

into this imaginary world there's some

7:19

where there's some bigger potential

7:21

credit problem." That's what the CEO is

7:23

saying. And then, of course, you have a

7:24

list of all these companies like

7:26

collapsing in private credit. And I kind

7:28

of think it's disingenuous because it's

7:30

every single time people go, "Guys,

7:34

everything is fine. You should know that

7:36

everything is not fine. It's almost

7:40

every single time. Like go into on this

7:44

list, you have the uh Sa Hotel

7:46

bankruptcy, right? Well, here is the Sa

7:50

hotel bankruptcy piece in the Wall

7:52

Street Journal, front page of the Wall

7:54

Street Journal today. And in it, they

7:56

literally do, where was it? It was an

7:58

all hands meeting. Anyway, they talk

8:00

about doing this all hands-on deck

8:02

meeting. Here it is. Uh employees were

8:03

summoned to an all hands meeting.

8:06

Managers expressed optimism that Sa

8:09

would soon be on solid ground. In other

8:12

words, guys, everything is fine.

8:14

Literally, literally, look at this. Look

8:16

at this. There's nothing to worry about,

8:18

says Nick Sa regional vice president

8:22

said during the meeting. We just have to

8:24

let everybody know that there are some

8:25

problems, but don't worry, everything is

8:28

fine. What happens 9 days later? They go

8:31

bankrupt [laughter]

8:35

every single time. It's like you you got

8:39

a company going, "Guys, don't withdraw

8:41

your money. Everything's okay." Bankrupt

8:44

within a couple weeks after that. It's

8:46

like the kiss of death. It's almost like

8:47

saying everything is fine is the kiss of

8:49

death itself. I don't know. That could

8:51

be like causation without correlation.

8:53

[laughter]

8:53

But anyway, the point is everything is

8:56

not fine. Like there actually are

8:58

private credit issues. And yes, our GDP

9:01

without artificial intelligence would

9:04

probably be in a recession. And what is

9:06

propping up artificial intelligence

9:08

right now? Debt.

9:10

Okay, now we're going to keep talking

9:12

about that, but first I want to talk to

9:14

you about this bounce that we had today.

9:16

Because the bounce today, I think, is

9:18

heavily driven by an unwinding of a

9:21

massive amount of shorts that we saw go

9:23

into triple leveraged uh options and

9:27

position taking on SEQs.

9:30

So, the SEQs are the triple leveraged

9:34

short for the QQQ index. and volumes or

9:39

flows into the SQS on Thursday were

9:43

massive. Absolutely massive. Like $12

9:45

billion of volume into this that those

9:48

buys had to get unwound today. And there

9:52

was actually a really bullish signal

9:54

this morning. Well, there were two

9:54

really bullish signals this morning that

9:56

suggested today could be a green day.

9:58

The first really bullish signal was Jim

10:01

Kramer going bearish. 9 hours ago, Jim

10:04

Kramer said there's no reason futures

10:06

should be higher. This is the curse of

10:07

the bulls. And then I'm like, all right,

10:09

that's a bullish catalyst uh right

10:11

there.

10:11

>> Bullish catalyst.

10:13

>> This is why I call Jim Kramer Kim

10:15

Kramer. It's like Karen Kramer. Kim

10:18

Kramer cast out most bullish catalyst

10:20

you could ask for. But there was

10:22

something else. Yes. And this is not a

10:24

pitch. This is to teach you.

10:27

In the alpha report this morning, I

10:29

said, "Look, today is a test for the

10:31

market." Okay, the test for the market

10:33

today is can we hold 595 and can we get

10:36

to 607? This these are copy and paste

10:39

lines from the alpha report. And I want

10:42

you to see what was in today's alpha

10:43

report. Look what I wrote. Thursday,

10:46

Bitcoin drops before a bit a big dump.

10:49

Friday, Bitcoin starts lower and the Q's

10:52

head lower. Today, Bitcoin is $2,000

10:55

higher than where it was on Friday.

10:57

Think about that. It was the first time

10:59

we actually saw Bitcoin higher. Usually

11:02

Bitcoin was leading the market lower

11:04

over the last few weeks, last three

11:06

weeks almost certainly. Bitcoin's almost

11:08

always been lower, lower, lower, lower,

11:10

and then the Q's go lower. And so I

11:12

literally wrote hopefully uh this is a

11:14

test essentially for positivity for the

11:17

Q's today. If I had any guess today,

11:19

Bitcoin starting up 2K versus Friday is

11:22

a great sign. So fingers crossed the Q's

11:25

rally and gets to 607.

11:28

That would be a good sign of strength

11:30

and reiterates by the dip. Folks, don't

11:33

look at the Q's today and look at the

11:35

numbers. Okay, let's look at the Q's and

11:37

look at the numbers. You can't make this

11:39

SH9T up, boys and girls. From 595,

11:42

literally, literally from 595, you

11:45

rocket ship. And look at where we ended

11:48

today. We ended right here. We had a

11:52

high of 60668.

11:55

Look at that. That's the 607 line right

11:57

there. Look how close. It's not 100%

12:00

perfect. That would be like crystal

12:01

ball. But I have to say, Bitcoin gave us

12:04

the signal. We pointed out the signal in

12:07

the alpha report this morning and we

12:08

went lineto line today. Now, the

12:10

question is, will it last? Well, whether

12:13

or not it lasts has to do with, first of

12:15

all, we got our short covering. Great.

12:17

That's great. that could be out of the

12:19

system now because we were oversold

12:21

there for a while. But whether or not

12:23

this lasts all comes down to the

12:26

capacity for this chart to keep going.

12:29

Debt, boys and girls. And there's a

12:31

second issue, too, and it has to do with

12:32

jobs. We'll talk about that in just a

12:33

moment. But bond issuance, look, we're

12:36

at the phase where as long as debt

12:38

issuance continues, AI growth can

12:41

continue. That's my opinion. As long as

12:43

we keep getting debt issuance, the debt

12:46

uh the AI bubble can keep going. Now, if

12:48

labor stalls and debt issuance slows,

12:52

private credit, liquidity crisis,

12:54

whatever, we are gloriously and royally

12:57

effed.

12:58

Now, I want to be clear, we do not want

13:00

a recession. Recessions are very

13:03

painful. Many people lose their jobs.

13:05

They are hell. But things would get

13:07

cheaper. Stocks would get cheaper.

13:09

Houses maybe. It depends on where as to

13:13

whether or not they would get cheaper.

13:14

Mostly because houses in many parts of

13:17

the country, not a foregone conclusion

13:19

that they're going to get cheaper

13:20

because we have so vastly underbuilt.

13:23

The New York Times actually had a piece

13:24

on this this morning that we are so

13:27

underbuilding compared to historical

13:29

pre208 averages. We are still

13:31

underbuilding today. You know, our poor

13:34

guy Graham, he made this like podcast

13:36

here where he laments how horrible it is

13:39

to build homes in LA. And I watch that

13:42

and I go, I know. And that is why I love

13:46

buying real estate in some of these blue

13:49

states because they're so with

13:52

their building policies that all they do

13:55

is drive housing prices up. So if you

13:58

want to hedge your investments and

14:01

diversify into real estate by hedging

14:04

whatever other investments you make, one

14:05

of the best investments is literally

14:08

investing in the stupidity of

14:09

politicians. What is one of the best

14:12

ways to invest in the stupidity of

14:16

superleft democratic real estate

14:18

policies?

14:20

Buying in real estate markets that are

14:23

exposed to those sort of political

14:25

thinkings. [laughter]

14:27

So the more liberal the policies, the

14:29

more you want to buy real estate there

14:31

because they're so incapable of

14:32

building. They just drive housing prices

14:34

up, which sucks for people who want to

14:37

get in. But if you know the game, you

14:39

just go whatever.

14:42

It's crazy. I'm not saying any of that

14:44

is good. I'm just making an observation.

14:46

I'm here to make observations about the

14:47

market. That's my job. Okay? And again,

14:50

I don't want So that's why I say like,

14:52

yeah, in a recession, things get

14:53

cheaper, but not necessarily because

14:55

housing has been underbuilt and loans

14:58

are pretty good relative to what you see

14:59

in 200 uh what you saw in 2006 and 7.

15:03

That was pretty bad. Six and seven. Um,

15:05

you know, loans are pretty stable. You

15:08

know, there's some areas of the market,

15:09

you know, FHA on the fringes and some of

15:11

the the some of the overbuilt markets

15:13

that are going to have problems. We know

15:15

that. But, you know, generally, you

15:16

don't want a recession because you're

15:17

going to lose your job. And so even if

15:19

things get cheaper, you're just not

15:20

gonna have the ability to finance new

15:22

real estate or or stocks, which sucks,

15:24

right? So therefore, this sudden

15:27

concentration of debt, right? This is

15:29

pretty sudden. This is a sudden

15:31

concentration of debt makes me a little

15:33

bit nervous. And it either means we have

15:35

to spend more to keep the Ponzi going,

15:38

so to speak, which is, you know, to stay

15:40

ahead of China or whatever, or worse,

15:43

oo, which you know, for a World of

15:45

Warcraft reference is out of mana. and

15:47

for us means out of money. If companies

15:50

are out of money, this is a really bad

15:52

sign. Uh, and it doesn't mean the

15:55

market's going to tank tomorrow, but it

15:56

means we're we're like possibly on the

15:59

last innings, which isn't great. Now, TS

16:03

Lombard did a had a little piece on the

16:05

supply session regarding labor, and

16:07

we're going to touch on this briefly.

16:09

Uh, but something that I do want to

16:10

touch on briefly as well is this. Like

16:13

one of the things that I like about

16:15

artificial intelligence uh and

16:17

artificial intelligence companies is I

16:19

want to look for companies that have low

16:21

exposure to these crazy debts. That's

16:24

why I like what Meta is doing. That's

16:26

why I've hated Oracle. We went back and

16:28

looked at our analysis on Oracle and we

16:31

saw that the analysis that we did on

16:32

this channel on Oracle where I said way

16:35

too much debt, stay away from Oracle was

16:38

on on September 10th, my dad's birthday.

16:41

Do you know what else September 10th

16:42

was? Can you look at this chart and

16:44

guess what September 10th was? September

16:46

10th right here, folks. The top of that

16:49

green line. I analyze Oracle. I go,

16:52

"Guys, danger, danger, danger. Watch

16:55

out. This is a bad fundamental play."

16:58

You know, cuz you could analyze stocks

17:00

in a few different ways. Fundamentals,

17:02

momentum, right? And then you have to

17:04

have a strategy associated with that. A

17:06

good fundamental buy, you could hold for

17:08

10 years. a momentum play, you can't

17:10

hold for 10 years. You you swing in and

17:12

out of that, right? But fundamentally,

17:14

this was a bad sign. So, you just want

17:16

to stay away from it. Now, 200 divided

17:19

by 345 means this puppy right here is

17:22

down 42%.

17:24

Since we did an analysis on this channel

17:28

makes sense. Why? Because of debt. And

17:30

this is why I say stay away from debt.

17:32

Now, one of the things that we're doing

17:33

because we're going to release our AI

17:35

app this this week. Uh it'll be coming

17:38

soon for December, but we're going to

17:40

start selling our AI app, which is

17:42

really exciting. The rein the

17:43

househack.com or reinvest.co uh AI.

17:46

We're calling it the reinvest AI. Uh and

17:49

we're our our vision is that we're going

17:51

to sell 2-year subscriptions and

17:53

lifetime subscriptions as a founding

17:56

membership. And the benefit of that is

17:58

it's twofolded. one people who sign up,

18:02

they get in and they lock in a price

18:04

where we think the product's going to be

18:06

worth 200 bucks a month, you know, once

18:08

the product is fully developed in about

18:10

a year when we think the product will be

18:11

fully developed. And we'll keep adding

18:13

updates obviously, but people who get in

18:15

now, they get a lifetime subscription at

18:17

one price, which will be a fraction of,

18:20

you know, $200 a month, right? It'll be

18:22

way less than that. Uh, you help us

18:24

build the beta out, but what does that

18:26

do? It lets us grow without debt. So you

18:29

as a foundation member, maybe you know a

18:31

few thousand of you join as foundation

18:34

members, you get the benefit of having

18:36

lifetime access to a net worth

18:39

exploding

18:41

uh hunter in real estate, our reinvest

18:44

AI, right? I mean it makes you

18:46

competitive in real estate. We'll talk

18:47

more about that separately. But what it

18:49

does is it also injects capital into our

18:54

company which then lets us reinvest into

18:56

the artificial intelligence without

18:58

debt. So it's win-win. People who join

19:01

get rewarded with the foundation uh uh

19:03

pricing in a year. You're going to look

19:06

back and be like, "Oh my gosh, it's so

19:08

much more expensive and it's so much

19:09

better, you know, a year from now, but

19:11

I've locked in this lifetime access,

19:12

right? It's not for sale right now. I'm

19:14

not trying to pitch it." The reason I'm

19:16

saying this is because I am putting my

19:18

money and my company's money where our

19:20

mouth is. We don't want to finance our

19:23

AI with debt. So, we want to sell a

19:28

really good service and give people

19:30

lifetime access and then use that

19:32

capital, keep growing the product, which

19:35

is already I think very good. Like day

19:37

one, I think it's already going to be

19:38

like, "Oh, this is kind of cool. You're

19:40

like literally countrywide throughout

19:42

the entire United States able to tell us

19:44

if a deal is, you know, likely to be a

19:46

deal in the eyes of Kevin or not,

19:48

nationwide. This is really cool. Now,

19:51

point of that is staying away from debt

19:53

because that debt bubble rolls over when

19:58

jobs roll over. Okay, so we're going to

20:00

talk about jobs. Let me just quickly

20:02

disclaim this just so I don't get in

20:03

trouble with the SEC. If you want to

20:05

invest in Houseack or Reinvest.co, co.

20:08

It's the same company. Yeah, you still

20:09

get a 5% yield, but make sure you read

20:11

the offering circular by going to

20:13

houseack.com or reinvest.co. This video

20:16

is not a solicitation. I'm using this as

20:18

an example. Oh, great. Michael Bur just

20:20

tweeted. Nvidia emailed a memo to Wall

20:23

Street sellside analyst to push back on

20:25

my arguments. I stand by my analysis.

20:28

Obviously, the full analysis does not

20:30

fit in a tweet. I will release my

20:32

timeline. The first post, the heretics

20:35

guide to AI is up now. It's a very light

20:37

read. Basically, all right, he's going

20:40

to double down on the depreciation play.

20:42

Look,

20:45

we have already addressed this with

20:47

Michael Bur. Remember, I said this last

20:49

week. I said, Michael Bur is not right

20:52

yet.

20:53

Then the market sold off and people

20:55

like, Kevin, it sounds like Michael Bur

20:56

is right. No, Michael Bur is has a

21:01

depreciation play that will take a while

21:03

to play out. What you need for the

21:06

Michael Bur depreciation play to play

21:07

out is either the labor market to roll

21:10

over, the debt cycle to stop, or both.

21:14

Then the depreciation play will play

21:16

out. Okay, so Michael Bur is like a

21:18

future problem. It's not a today

21:20

problem, it's a future problem. So what

21:22

else is part of this today problem?

21:24

Well, the supply session and the Fed. So

21:26

what do we have over here? Ordinarily,

21:28

the Fed would be chomping at the bit to

21:29

cut rates because of the Phillips curve,

21:32

right? because our payrolls are trending

21:33

near zero. The problem is right now

21:37

we're not at zero. In fact, if you look

21:40

at where we sit right now on payrolls

21:42

growth, I made this little chart right

21:44

here. Our 3-month average on Bureau of

21:47

Labor Statistics provided payrolls is

21:49

62,000. Our six-month average is 59,000

21:52

and our year-to- date average is 76,000.

21:55

So, we're not near zero. Once you hit

21:57

like zero, six months later, it tends to

22:00

get even worse. So once you go to zero

22:03

for six months, it's bad. You're

22:06

probably going into a recession, but

22:08

we're not at zero yet. And so I kind of

22:11

disputed a little bit about this article

22:13

where they're like, "Oh no, zero is this

22:15

is bad. We're trending towards zero."

22:16

We're not there yet. Now, of course,

22:18

there are arguments that the stock

22:20

market will fall, you know, the stock

22:21

market following could cause

22:23

participation to rise as early retirees

22:25

come back. We already know that old

22:26

news. There's also this idea that oh,

22:30

you know, because the foreignb born

22:32

labor supply is declining, native born

22:34

is going up. But this is apparently

22:36

misleading because of the way they

22:37

collect the data. Like they collect

22:39

survey responses and if they're just

22:41

getting fewer from one, they assume the

22:43

other side is higher. It's like totally

22:45

skewed. Just ignore it. It's a bunch of

22:46

crap. Doesn't matter. So, the point of

22:50

bringing this up is that right now it's

22:52

unlikely we're going to see inflation

22:54

like we saw in the 1967 low landing

22:58

because back then we had this massive

23:01

worker shortage. Okay, so let's phrase

23:03

this clearly to simplify this. What's

23:05

bad for inflation is what happened in

23:07

1967 and 2021, which is having two

23:12

openings per every one worker. Okay,

23:16

right now we're the opposite. We have

23:19

less than one opening per every one

23:22

worker. So, this means we're not likely

23:24

to see an inflation problem. They don't

23:27

mention that in this article, so I'm

23:28

sort of like leaning on this article to

23:30

say, look at this chart. Here's why it's

23:33

wrong. We don't have an inflation

23:35

problem right now. Yes, prices have gone

23:37

up a lot, but we don't actually have an

23:38

inflation problem. We have a bigger risk

23:40

that the Fed is going to make a policy

23:42

mistake by not cutting rates. That's I

23:44

think why markets are also enthusiastic

23:46

because Waller said, "Hey, we're going

23:48

to go for the cut." Mary Dailyaly today

23:50

is like, "Hey, we're going to go for the

23:51

cut." So, where does that leave us now?

23:54

We have a lot of information here. We

23:56

know what's going on with the AI debt

23:57

bubble, the recession, stock performance

24:00

and movements. We know to stay away from

24:02

the debt plays. Talked a little bit

24:04

about real estate, talked a little bit

24:06

about labor. How do we put all of this

24:08

puzzle together? Here's how. First, we

24:11

need a whole 605 on the cues. Okay,

24:16

that's pretty important. Then no more

24:20

private credit pain also very important.

24:23

Any kind of shock here, shock would be

24:26

very bad right now. Okay, so hold 605 in

24:29

the cues. No more credit pain. Great.

24:34

After that, we really want strong retail

24:37

sales. uh will likely get because people

24:41

don't stop spending until they lose

24:42

their jobs. And then we go into

24:46

um the D10 Fed meeting with a 98% chance

24:52

of a Fed cut. So far, we're climbing

24:55

over 76% because Mary Dailyaly and

24:59

Waller pushing for that rate cut, which

25:02

is great. This is you turn the odds of a

25:05

Fed rate uh uh hold, which on Friday

25:08

morning, if you watch my video Friday

25:09

morning, I'm like, this is actually

25:10

good. Like Waller's coming out trying to

25:13

talk this up. Remember what we said last

25:14

week, you need the Fed to talk up the

25:18

chance of a rate cut. They have until

25:20

this Friday to do that. So between now

25:22

and Friday, talk up the rate cut. Get us

25:24

to 98%. That's bullish. Strong retail

25:26

sales we'll likely get. That'll be

25:28

bullish. No more private credit paying.

25:29

That'll be good. Then if we can get

25:31

through

25:33

the next two months with few layoff

25:36

announcements on top of what we've had,

25:39

uh we might be able to get back to

25:43

employment growth and we stick a soft

25:46

landing with major bull catalysts. Like

25:50

think about the bull catalyst that we

25:51

have. Uh deregulation, that's huge. Uh

25:55

then we have the tax incentives from the

25:57

big beautiful bill. That's huge. Then on

26:00

top of that, we're uh expecting fiscal

26:02

stimulus and rate cuts, right?

26:05

Potentially stimulus checks, more rate

26:07

cuts. This is all good. We're not we're

26:10

hoping inflation stays tame so we can

26:12

keep getting rate cuts. We could stick

26:14

this. So that's why I think there are

26:16

opportunities to spend some money on

26:18

those 10-year stocks to buy. And that's

26:22

why I'm kind of in the middle right now.

26:23

I'm like, I know we're shockprone.

26:26

I'm selling where I don't like my

26:28

exposure and I'm buying things I'm

26:30

willing to hold even through a recession

26:31

for the next 10 years and I'm trying to

26:33

stay away from he debt heavy plays

26:36

because debt is what's going to take

26:37

this this economy down soon as that that

26:40

debt bubble in AI stops. I start getting

26:43

nervous and that that debt chart this

26:46

right here this should make you nervous

26:48

too. Anyway, my take on today. Thanks so

26:51

much for watching. We'll see you in the

26:52

next one. Goodbye and good luck. Why not

26:53

advertise these things that you told us

26:55

here? I feel like nobody else knows

26:56

about this.

26:57

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

26:59

see how it goes.

26:59

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

27:01

much. People love you. People look up to

27:02

you.

27:03

>> Kevin Praath there, financial [music]

27:04

analyst and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always

27:06

great to get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.