Will the Market Crash get Worse | Cathie Wood.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
if you want to invest in bitcoin in a
safe way check out block five by going
to metcalf.com
bf and get up to 250 totally for
free when you deposit money with blockfi
they pay between five to eight percent
on different cryptocurrencies
so check it out metkevin.com bf like
block fi
and using that referral code is how
you'll get that free 250
when you sign up and deposit money with
block fi
how much you get depends on how much you
deposit matt kevin.com
bf the market this week felt horrible in
fact many are considering it
the start of a potential market crash
well
here's what kathy wood has to say about
what the heck is going on
in this market now as usual remember
please don't sue me bro i'm just a dude
making a video outlining what kathy wood
thinks and trying to simplify what the
heck it is
that she's talking about and trying to
save some time so let's get into some of
the bottom lines
first kathy wood in her video released
yesterday stated
that we already know that bonds sold off
this week
due to concerns for inflation fed rate
hikes
growth in the economy and additional
rounds of bonds being released to
finance stimulus if you need more
clarity on this type into youtube meet
kevin
why the market crash today and look for
my video from thursday
but the big question right now is what's
next not what happened what's next
our yields going to continue to
skyrocket causing another stock market
sell-off
or was this a one-off and are we good
now can we just go back to investing
and looking at our green attendees well
according to kathy wood
bonds are very heavily shorted and have
been historically
not shorted as highly as they are now
and that could have led to the latest
sell-off that we're seeing in the market
especially what happened on thursday
because when bonds sell off yields go up
and that's what spooked the stock market
now kathy wood actually believes that we
might see a
pause in yields going up because the
amount of shorting in the bond market
may now slow down after the catastrophe
that we saw on thursday
and this is a little bit tricky to wrap
our heads around because we have to ask
ourselves okay so
bonds were shorted so their prices went
down which meant their interest rate
yield went
up and in order for prices to continue
going down maybe we'd need more people
shorting them
but because yields are higher now maybe
less people are inclined to short them
so that's a theory and that's kind of
what kathy wood
is outlining in other words saying hey
right now we think there might be a
pause
in increasing interest rates in the bond
market
which means a pause in the sell-off in
the stock market
that's kathy wood's take now kathy woods
take here
i have to say a little little tricky to
really grasp uh
grasp on to so i did a little bit of
research and uh
digging and i came across this which is
actually
the march 1st edition of the berens
publication
even though technically it came out
today on february 27th here two days
early but that's how they publish these
things
but anyway this is an article and i
publish all of these uh all my new
research by the way i've got a new
section in my stocks and money course
where
anytime i'm researching something i'm
going to be providing you exactly what
i'm reading so it's just a convenient
extra way to
if you're looking for something to read
read what i'm reading but anyway
what's interesting about this article
here scorched stock bulls
learn bonds aren't so boring after all
in the article they tell us a little bit
more first
they tell us what happened on thursday
wasn't so much that bond yields went up
it was quote
the ferocity at which most of the action
took place on thursday in other words
the rate at which yields went up how
quickly they spiked that spooked the
stock market not necessarily that they
did
and they mention that quote yet by
week's end it appeared
the backup in treasury yields might have
run its course
at least for now they go on to say that
the treasury market actually appears
oversold right now especially when we
look at the relative strength index the
rsi a technic a very common technical
that's used for trading
that really what the market might just
be doing is trying to price
in the fact that interest rates might be
going up in the future
in other words we're regularly fearful
that oh man as soon as interest rates go
up the market might crash and pull back
barons is kind of saying hey we might
start seeing that pricing in
happening now because remember the stock
market tries to price in future terms
the stock market's trying to say hey
let's price in what we think
the market's going to be like in 18
months to two years
and so baron suggests hey you know what
this spike that we've seen recently
could have been a short-term adjustment
to
okay yields went up they went up at a
fast rate great we're done we had our
sell-off we had our price in
let's go back to normal now and so
behrens and kathy here kind of
agree and in my opinion this is kind of
neat because
a if rates go up then maybe stocks won't
crash
as hard in the future because maybe
we've already started pricing in that
expectation
and b if inflation doesn't end up coming
around
and rates don't end up going up we could
end up pricing
out that risk meaning stocks could go up
even more
in other words both kathy and barents
here are actually being kind of bullish
after the madness that we saw on
thursday
and on thursday there was a lot of pain
on thursday i was doing everything i
could to make sure all of y'all who
support me
and watch me on the channel or in the
courses that i have linked down below
use that coupon code that's down there
uh but anyway i was trying to do
whatever i could to encourage hey
this is the time to hold this is the
time to add by the dip right
by the tip anyway the fact is that now
here
looking back we've got kathy wood over
at arkhanvest obviously very popular and
baron suggesting hey
this is good you know we let some steam
out of the market but we think that pain
is at least for now
temporarily over that's a good thing
it's bullish now we don't want to stick
our head in the sand and be stupid and
go yolo 100 on margin
but this is good to understand what
their perspectives are
now kathy's perspectives go a lot deeper
when it comes to valuing
and she broke a lot of that down
yesterday and here's just a simple
explanation so kathy wood believes that
people generally expect a return of
about four to five percent in the stock
market
and therefore if you take a very simple
formula that she uses which is simply
the number one
divided by the yield that you expect you
get a price
to earnings ratio and if you take four
to five
well one divided by four to five percent
you would get a price to earnings ratio
in the market of somewhere between 20 to
25
which she says okay cool like we tend to
top
out around 20 to 25 but
wait a minute what if the expectation
that people have that the stock market
is going to return
on their money in the future declines to
say
two to three percent well in theory then
price to earnings ratios could go as
high as 33
to 50. whereas in the past or in a down
market
maybe we'd expect a six to seven percent
return on our money where p e ratios are
like 14 to 16.
kathy wood actually thinks the opposite
might happen that is we could see
average price to earnings ratios
multiples in the stock market
sitting around 33 to 55 as people demand
less of a return on their money as we
kind of stay and settle in
a potentially lower interest rate
environment which is actually
really bullish for stocks because right
now there are a lot of individuals
who look at the s ps price to earnings
ratio for example or the price to
earnings ratio of companies
and we get confused because we're like
oh my gosh everything feels so
historically high
but if people's expectations of returns
on their money
go down that is they're willing to pay a
higher price for the same
share of earnings from companies then
maybe stocks aren't really overvalued
now it just becomes a matter of more
people are in the market because maybe
more money was generated after all 50 or
we say
25 to 30 percent of all money that's in
the market now was it generated
in 2020 which is kind of weird to say
but uh anyway
if that's the case and people are
looking and searching for returns
then maybe kathy wood is right maybe
broader index funds are only going to
return two to three percent
compared to the old school seven percent
before reinvesting dividends
because so many more people are chasing
the same returns
and this is why kathy wood believes it's
so important to
laser focus on technology innovation
and dna and genomics so here's
kathy woods kind of rationale for this
kathy believes and this is something
she's been very consistent about
that legacy blue chip companies like gm
which she
singled out are so far behind the
technology race
that they're failing to realize the pace
of innovation that's taking place
and once they finally get it they're
going to have to substantially cut the
prices of their products in the future
to even stand a chance at competing
and this will end up leading to a rey
dalio style of deflation
which she views as bad which is really
where companies go through this
great deleveraging by cutting prices to
try to stay competitive to at the same
time eliminate
their debt before they can get consumed
by their own debt
so this is where kathy says the correct
answer here
in all of what we've just talked about
is doubling down on
innovation and she turns the market
drama of
this last week on its head she says look
i've been down this road before in fact
as recently as
2016 and 17 we had money in markets
after donald trump's election shift to
value plays and away from technology
she actually says that 2016 and 17 were
very painful for arc invest
because they invest so heavily in
innovation in tech but that's not what
did well
after trump's election yet kathy wood
and this is where you you kind of go
down the kathy rabbit hole
that's okay if you believe in her kathy
wood believes hey look
as long as money is expanding into these
other sectors like value
which could end up being value traps but
hey that's on other people i'm not
investing there
as she says anyway the more money
invests into these other areas
the better it actually is for technology
and innovation because
as more money spreads into these other
in her opinion lower growth
areas then in the future as technology
and innovation
show this is where the game is this is
where the money is being made
you want to be an innovation in tech
then money might actually flow
from value in other sectors back into
tech genomics and
innovation and actually end up leading
to outsized returns
in those sectors much like what we saw
in 2019 and 2020 with tesla
and tech so in other words
kathy wood is turning around what
happened this week
completely on its head and saying hey oh
this whole like correction that happened
last week first of all called it she did
say in january hats off to her that we
should prepare for some form of a
correction this year
she said she didn't know when but that
you should always be prepared for it so
hats off
she is correct uh but uh what she's also
saying is hey
look by the dip like get in on
technology and innovation
during these times when people are
distracted by maybe
what plays that appear to be value plays
but could end up being
value traps or even index funds which
she is
deathly opposed to maybe not deathly but
she's not very
excited about index funds anyway and
maybe who knows maybe there's a bias
at play here because she does run an
actively managed etf exchange traded
fund
which basically means you can invest in
her actively managed fund
by buying shares in things like rk arc
g r w and so on now when it comes to
interest rates kathy wood believes
that there are two trajectories for
interest rates
and what the federal reserve might do
she believes that the fed will either
raise rates sooner to combat potential
inflation that
potentially jerome powell is going to
have to u-turn on his argument that
we're not going to raise rates until
2024.
this by the way is a scenario that i
kind of disagree with personally i kind
of think that jerome is
going to stick to his guns and we're not
going to see the fed raise rates until
2024 but
you know you you can't always be 100 in
on something you have to be open to all
possible scenarios but anyway
she believes that the fed's going to
change trajectories and and they're
going to end up raising rates
sooner rather than later and that's one
of the reasons she is bullish on
bitcoin but it's also one of her
explanations for
well that is why we might potentially
see some volatility in
stocks like the tech sector genomic
sector as the market begins to price in
rates which we just saw in this last
week
now there is a flip side though and this
is the side that i'm a little bit more
inclined to believe in and this is the
side that
kathy wood also addresses which is very
important because
it totally makes sense and this has to
do with the decline in the velocity of
money
so this is something we've gone deep on
as well before on this channel but
the easiest way to explain the velocity
of money and to kind of show this
alternate scenario so if scenario number
one is fed changes their opinion they
raise rates sooner than expected then
scenario number two
is the fed doesn't raise rates right we
go with with the more like
kevin fed strategy of let's wait until
2024. and again i'm not trying to like
align myself 100 with one direction i'm
just leaning more towards i don't think
the fed's going to raise rates anytime
soon
anyway in that scenario which kathy wood
addresses she believes the velocity of
money can stay low
and maybe we don't actually have to
raise rates and here's an easy example
for this
let's say there are 100 of us in a
classroom
so kind of think about it like a college
lecture hall okay so there are a hundred
of us in a classroom
let's say every single one of us has one
billion
dollars that is one of these little
pieces of paper right here represents
one billion dollars now let's say we
all buy something from each other 10
times
in other words i buy you or i buy a cup
of coffee from you for a billion dollars
then you take my billion dollars and you
go buy i don't know toilet paper for a
billion dollars whatever
the point is all of our money circulates
in our little
economy in this lecture hall 10 times so
now we've kind of created this
lecture hall economy well if we have 100
people
and our money exchanges hands 10 times
and we each have
a billion dollars then we take 100
billion times 10
and we have a 1 trillion dollar economy
okay cool
well now let's say we get somebody like
uh mr j powell
and he's got a money printer and he
walks in the room as a substitute
teacher for the day
and uh he cranks out you know what
jerome powell cranks
cold hard cash what else and he doubles
the money we all have
so all of a sudden now instead of having
one billion dollars we actually have
two billion dollars which means we've
doubled the amount of money that we have
which means in theory instead of just
buying one coffee i could buy twice as
many coffees
and if i were to buy twice as many
coffees the price of that coffee might
go up
because there might be so much more
demand on coffee the price of coffee
might go up which means there might be
inflation
but what if maybe i double my money
but now i go ahead and save and invest
the other half
and maybe even a little bit more and i
actually only circulate like 700
million of my billion dollars instead of
the full two billion dollars or even the
full one billion that i before
and now i'm actually exchanging less
money that's circulating
well now even though we've printed more
money our economy is actually in this
more extreme example here shrunk our
economy went from a one trillion dollar
economy
to us each only circulating 700 million
dollars meaning we've gone to a 700
billion dollar economy
so we actually had a decline in gdp
which means
less demand for products and services
which means potentially less pressure on
inflation
which means prices could actually come
down despite the fact that we now have
way more money and that that's a very
real possibility
because this is something that i've
mentioned often on this channel during
this pandemic is
in my opinion we could be going into
something that i call the frugal decade
which is where we actually save
and invest more than we spend
it's kind of like what i showed here
we're sure we have maybe
more money but we save and invest this
and then you know we don't need to spend
this we just we just don't need to spend
that much money let's put that away we
still got money to spend we're still
gonna go on vacations and stuff we're
still gonna have a reopening boom but
if the velocity of money goes down
inflation might not actually
happen and if inflation doesn't actually
happen
then the fed won't have to raise rates
as much and they can continue to fight
unemployment
which is their goal after all that is
part of their dual mandate
and arguably it is one of the most
important parts of their dual mandate
price stability and unemployment and we
want to see unemployment as low as
possible
so in other words kathy wood is bullish
in an environment where rates go up
because she believes in innovation
but she's also bullish in an environment
where rates stay low because if rates
stay low well that's just going to keep
pumping money into the stock market
anyway
and so no matter how you slice the
inflation debate
kathy wood is like look tech and
innovation okay like how many different
times we're gonna have to explain the
same freaking thing tech and innovation
okay
and one of the reasons she's so bullish
on tech and innovation is because she
believes
that electric vehicle companies become
more
efficient for every doubling
of output and this is kind of
interesting she says look when the ev
industry doubles their output
they become 28 more efficient every time
they double
28 28 28 and i'm sure there's some kind
of declining scale to that but still
that that doubling in efficiency
huge because that means profits that
means 10 d's yes and we all like tendees
in the dna sequency sequencing
industries she actually believes that's
more like
a 40 increase in efficiency
now kathy also reiterated her belief in
bitcoin
suggesting that uh energy costs are a
non-issue
relative to the traditional banking
system which uses a lot of energy
or even compared to the energy it takes
to mine gold for
example and she does view bitcoin as a
digital
gold she believes the use cases for
bitcoin are just beginning and even
though bitcoin might be a little bit
slower
than smart contracts at ethereum she
believes bitcoin is the safest
cryptocurrency there there is
and she basically went on to call and
and she didn't because kathy was very
nice but she kind of basically went on
to call
jane yellen a boomer and kind of
suggested that janie yellen doesn't
really understand
what the heck she's talking about with
bitcoin yet and don't you worry
bitcoin's still going to 400 thousand
dollars now
all of this could have just been the
biggest defense for
kathy wood and maybe i'm just
perpetuating that defense i don't invest
in kathy woods funds
but you know i tend to agree with a lot
of her perspectives i'm a little bit
more
on the side that we're not going to see
inflation as quickly i'm kind of on the
side that we're going to have this
frugal decade and see less
uh you know less velocity of money could
be wrong there but but then again i'm
like
i would say like 80 20 uh you know 80
leaning towards less inflation 20
keeping the door open and we'll see that
can change over time
and of course kathy wood appears to be
somewhere maybe closer to like 50
50 on that maybe she's even like no i'm
like 60
the fed's gonna raise rates sooner
rather than later she's kind of treading
lightly there in terms of which side
she's actually on
not that it really matters i mean the
slight differences don't matter i think
we're both still going to be investing
in genomics and tech because the sectors
are freaking
awesome and innovation it's great but uh
yeah there you have it so this was
either
a uh fully detailed advertisement for
arc i'm not sponsored or affiliated with
arc in all transparency here
or hopefully this was educational for
you and i want to know do you agree with
kathy
or has she lost her mind is she missing
something completely
and are we instead going to see a more
reverse of what i've just described
where we see maybe a peter schiff style
future where the fed doesn't think about
raising rates the fed actually can't
raise rates
instead they need to print more money
because the dollar is collapsing and we
have much larger economic issues because
all of our wealth is relatively
disappearing unless of course we're
trying to protect ourselves in stock
market
or assets but ideally not dollar
denominated assets but then again
now we're really opening pandora's box
and i did just have a two hour interview
with peter schiff
so i think i'm not doing that justice by
talking about that for about 30 seconds
at the end of a kathy wood interview
video not interview video anywho if you
found this helpful
make sure to share consider subscribing
to the channel and folks we'll see in
the next one
[Music]
you
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.