⚠️ Some features may be temporarily unavailable due to an ongoing 3rd party provider issue. We apologize for the inconvenience and expect this to be resolved soon.
TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Will the Market Crash get Worse | Cathie Wood.

21m 0s4,033 words686 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

if you want to invest in bitcoin in a

0:01

safe way check out block five by going

0:03

to metcalf.com

0:04

bf and get up to 250 totally for

0:07

free when you deposit money with blockfi

0:09

they pay between five to eight percent

0:11

on different cryptocurrencies

0:13

so check it out metkevin.com bf like

0:16

block fi

0:17

and using that referral code is how

0:18

you'll get that free 250

0:20

when you sign up and deposit money with

0:23

block fi

0:24

how much you get depends on how much you

0:25

deposit matt kevin.com

0:27

bf the market this week felt horrible in

0:29

fact many are considering it

0:31

the start of a potential market crash

0:33

well

0:34

here's what kathy wood has to say about

0:36

what the heck is going on

0:37

in this market now as usual remember

0:40

please don't sue me bro i'm just a dude

0:42

making a video outlining what kathy wood

0:44

thinks and trying to simplify what the

0:46

heck it is

0:47

that she's talking about and trying to

0:49

save some time so let's get into some of

0:51

the bottom lines

0:52

first kathy wood in her video released

0:55

yesterday stated

0:56

that we already know that bonds sold off

0:58

this week

0:59

due to concerns for inflation fed rate

1:01

hikes

1:02

growth in the economy and additional

1:04

rounds of bonds being released to

1:05

finance stimulus if you need more

1:07

clarity on this type into youtube meet

1:09

kevin

1:09

why the market crash today and look for

1:11

my video from thursday

1:13

but the big question right now is what's

1:16

next not what happened what's next

1:19

our yields going to continue to

1:21

skyrocket causing another stock market

1:23

sell-off

1:24

or was this a one-off and are we good

1:26

now can we just go back to investing

1:28

and looking at our green attendees well

1:31

according to kathy wood

1:33

bonds are very heavily shorted and have

1:36

been historically

1:37

not shorted as highly as they are now

1:39

and that could have led to the latest

1:41

sell-off that we're seeing in the market

1:43

especially what happened on thursday

1:45

because when bonds sell off yields go up

1:48

and that's what spooked the stock market

1:50

now kathy wood actually believes that we

1:53

might see a

1:54

pause in yields going up because the

1:56

amount of shorting in the bond market

1:58

may now slow down after the catastrophe

2:01

that we saw on thursday

2:02

and this is a little bit tricky to wrap

2:04

our heads around because we have to ask

2:06

ourselves okay so

2:07

bonds were shorted so their prices went

2:10

down which meant their interest rate

2:12

yield went

2:13

up and in order for prices to continue

2:16

going down maybe we'd need more people

2:17

shorting them

2:19

but because yields are higher now maybe

2:21

less people are inclined to short them

2:24

so that's a theory and that's kind of

2:26

what kathy wood

2:27

is outlining in other words saying hey

2:29

right now we think there might be a

2:31

pause

2:32

in increasing interest rates in the bond

2:34

market

2:35

which means a pause in the sell-off in

2:38

the stock market

2:39

that's kathy wood's take now kathy woods

2:41

take here

2:42

i have to say a little little tricky to

2:45

really grasp uh

2:46

grasp on to so i did a little bit of

2:49

research and uh

2:50

digging and i came across this which is

2:52

actually

2:53

the march 1st edition of the berens

2:56

publication

2:57

even though technically it came out

2:59

today on february 27th here two days

3:01

early but that's how they publish these

3:02

things

3:03

but anyway this is an article and i

3:05

publish all of these uh all my new

3:07

research by the way i've got a new

3:08

section in my stocks and money course

3:10

where

3:10

anytime i'm researching something i'm

3:12

going to be providing you exactly what

3:13

i'm reading so it's just a convenient

3:14

extra way to

3:15

if you're looking for something to read

3:17

read what i'm reading but anyway

3:19

what's interesting about this article

3:20

here scorched stock bulls

3:22

learn bonds aren't so boring after all

3:26

in the article they tell us a little bit

3:28

more first

3:29

they tell us what happened on thursday

3:32

wasn't so much that bond yields went up

3:34

it was quote

3:35

the ferocity at which most of the action

3:39

took place on thursday in other words

3:42

the rate at which yields went up how

3:44

quickly they spiked that spooked the

3:46

stock market not necessarily that they

3:48

did

3:49

and they mention that quote yet by

3:52

week's end it appeared

3:54

the backup in treasury yields might have

3:57

run its course

3:58

at least for now they go on to say that

4:00

the treasury market actually appears

4:02

oversold right now especially when we

4:04

look at the relative strength index the

4:06

rsi a technic a very common technical

4:08

that's used for trading

4:09

that really what the market might just

4:11

be doing is trying to price

4:12

in the fact that interest rates might be

4:15

going up in the future

4:16

in other words we're regularly fearful

4:18

that oh man as soon as interest rates go

4:21

up the market might crash and pull back

4:23

barons is kind of saying hey we might

4:26

start seeing that pricing in

4:27

happening now because remember the stock

4:29

market tries to price in future terms

4:32

the stock market's trying to say hey

4:33

let's price in what we think

4:35

the market's going to be like in 18

4:37

months to two years

4:38

and so baron suggests hey you know what

4:41

this spike that we've seen recently

4:43

could have been a short-term adjustment

4:45

to

4:46

okay yields went up they went up at a

4:48

fast rate great we're done we had our

4:50

sell-off we had our price in

4:52

let's go back to normal now and so

4:54

behrens and kathy here kind of

4:56

agree and in my opinion this is kind of

4:58

neat because

4:59

a if rates go up then maybe stocks won't

5:02

crash

5:03

as hard in the future because maybe

5:04

we've already started pricing in that

5:06

expectation

5:07

and b if inflation doesn't end up coming

5:10

around

5:11

and rates don't end up going up we could

5:14

end up pricing

5:15

out that risk meaning stocks could go up

5:17

even more

5:19

in other words both kathy and barents

5:21

here are actually being kind of bullish

5:24

after the madness that we saw on

5:26

thursday

5:27

and on thursday there was a lot of pain

5:29

on thursday i was doing everything i

5:31

could to make sure all of y'all who

5:32

support me

5:33

and watch me on the channel or in the

5:34

courses that i have linked down below

5:36

use that coupon code that's down there

5:38

uh but anyway i was trying to do

5:39

whatever i could to encourage hey

5:41

this is the time to hold this is the

5:43

time to add by the dip right

5:46

by the tip anyway the fact is that now

5:49

here

5:50

looking back we've got kathy wood over

5:52

at arkhanvest obviously very popular and

5:54

baron suggesting hey

5:55

this is good you know we let some steam

5:57

out of the market but we think that pain

5:59

is at least for now

6:00

temporarily over that's a good thing

6:03

it's bullish now we don't want to stick

6:04

our head in the sand and be stupid and

6:06

go yolo 100 on margin

6:08

but this is good to understand what

6:10

their perspectives are

6:12

now kathy's perspectives go a lot deeper

6:14

when it comes to valuing

6:16

and she broke a lot of that down

6:17

yesterday and here's just a simple

6:19

explanation so kathy wood believes that

6:22

people generally expect a return of

6:24

about four to five percent in the stock

6:25

market

6:26

and therefore if you take a very simple

6:28

formula that she uses which is simply

6:30

the number one

6:31

divided by the yield that you expect you

6:34

get a price

6:35

to earnings ratio and if you take four

6:37

to five

6:38

well one divided by four to five percent

6:40

you would get a price to earnings ratio

6:41

in the market of somewhere between 20 to

6:43

25

6:44

which she says okay cool like we tend to

6:47

top

6:48

out around 20 to 25 but

6:51

wait a minute what if the expectation

6:54

that people have that the stock market

6:56

is going to return

6:57

on their money in the future declines to

7:00

say

7:01

two to three percent well in theory then

7:04

price to earnings ratios could go as

7:06

high as 33

7:07

to 50. whereas in the past or in a down

7:10

market

7:11

maybe we'd expect a six to seven percent

7:13

return on our money where p e ratios are

7:15

like 14 to 16.

7:17

kathy wood actually thinks the opposite

7:19

might happen that is we could see

7:21

average price to earnings ratios

7:23

multiples in the stock market

7:25

sitting around 33 to 55 as people demand

7:28

less of a return on their money as we

7:30

kind of stay and settle in

7:32

a potentially lower interest rate

7:34

environment which is actually

7:36

really bullish for stocks because right

7:38

now there are a lot of individuals

7:40

who look at the s ps price to earnings

7:43

ratio for example or the price to

7:44

earnings ratio of companies

7:46

and we get confused because we're like

7:47

oh my gosh everything feels so

7:49

historically high

7:50

but if people's expectations of returns

7:53

on their money

7:54

go down that is they're willing to pay a

7:56

higher price for the same

7:58

share of earnings from companies then

8:00

maybe stocks aren't really overvalued

8:02

now it just becomes a matter of more

8:04

people are in the market because maybe

8:06

more money was generated after all 50 or

8:08

we say

8:08

25 to 30 percent of all money that's in

8:10

the market now was it generated

8:12

in 2020 which is kind of weird to say

8:14

but uh anyway

8:15

if that's the case and people are

8:17

looking and searching for returns

8:19

then maybe kathy wood is right maybe

8:21

broader index funds are only going to

8:23

return two to three percent

8:25

compared to the old school seven percent

8:27

before reinvesting dividends

8:28

because so many more people are chasing

8:30

the same returns

8:32

and this is why kathy wood believes it's

8:33

so important to

8:35

laser focus on technology innovation

8:39

and dna and genomics so here's

8:42

kathy woods kind of rationale for this

8:45

kathy believes and this is something

8:47

she's been very consistent about

8:49

that legacy blue chip companies like gm

8:52

which she

8:52

singled out are so far behind the

8:55

technology race

8:56

that they're failing to realize the pace

8:58

of innovation that's taking place

9:00

and once they finally get it they're

9:02

going to have to substantially cut the

9:04

prices of their products in the future

9:06

to even stand a chance at competing

9:08

and this will end up leading to a rey

9:10

dalio style of deflation

9:13

which she views as bad which is really

9:15

where companies go through this

9:16

great deleveraging by cutting prices to

9:19

try to stay competitive to at the same

9:21

time eliminate

9:22

their debt before they can get consumed

9:24

by their own debt

9:25

so this is where kathy says the correct

9:27

answer here

9:28

in all of what we've just talked about

9:30

is doubling down on

9:32

innovation and she turns the market

9:34

drama of

9:35

this last week on its head she says look

9:38

i've been down this road before in fact

9:40

as recently as

9:41

2016 and 17 we had money in markets

9:45

after donald trump's election shift to

9:47

value plays and away from technology

9:50

she actually says that 2016 and 17 were

9:52

very painful for arc invest

9:54

because they invest so heavily in

9:55

innovation in tech but that's not what

9:57

did well

9:58

after trump's election yet kathy wood

10:01

and this is where you you kind of go

10:02

down the kathy rabbit hole

10:05

that's okay if you believe in her kathy

10:07

wood believes hey look

10:09

as long as money is expanding into these

10:12

other sectors like value

10:14

which could end up being value traps but

10:16

hey that's on other people i'm not

10:17

investing there

10:18

as she says anyway the more money

10:20

invests into these other areas

10:22

the better it actually is for technology

10:24

and innovation because

10:25

as more money spreads into these other

10:27

in her opinion lower growth

10:28

areas then in the future as technology

10:31

and innovation

10:32

show this is where the game is this is

10:35

where the money is being made

10:37

you want to be an innovation in tech

10:39

then money might actually flow

10:40

from value in other sectors back into

10:43

tech genomics and

10:44

innovation and actually end up leading

10:46

to outsized returns

10:48

in those sectors much like what we saw

10:52

in 2019 and 2020 with tesla

10:55

and tech so in other words

10:59

kathy wood is turning around what

11:01

happened this week

11:03

completely on its head and saying hey oh

11:05

this whole like correction that happened

11:07

last week first of all called it she did

11:09

say in january hats off to her that we

11:11

should prepare for some form of a

11:12

correction this year

11:13

she said she didn't know when but that

11:14

you should always be prepared for it so

11:16

hats off

11:17

she is correct uh but uh what she's also

11:20

saying is hey

11:21

look by the dip like get in on

11:24

technology and innovation

11:25

during these times when people are

11:27

distracted by maybe

11:29

what plays that appear to be value plays

11:31

but could end up being

11:32

value traps or even index funds which

11:35

she is

11:36

deathly opposed to maybe not deathly but

11:38

she's not very

11:39

excited about index funds anyway and

11:41

maybe who knows maybe there's a bias

11:43

at play here because she does run an

11:45

actively managed etf exchange traded

11:47

fund

11:48

which basically means you can invest in

11:49

her actively managed fund

11:51

by buying shares in things like rk arc

11:54

g r w and so on now when it comes to

11:57

interest rates kathy wood believes

11:59

that there are two trajectories for

12:01

interest rates

12:02

and what the federal reserve might do

12:05

she believes that the fed will either

12:07

raise rates sooner to combat potential

12:10

inflation that

12:10

potentially jerome powell is going to

12:12

have to u-turn on his argument that

12:14

we're not going to raise rates until

12:16

2024.

12:17

this by the way is a scenario that i

12:18

kind of disagree with personally i kind

12:20

of think that jerome is

12:22

going to stick to his guns and we're not

12:23

going to see the fed raise rates until

12:24

2024 but

12:26

you know you you can't always be 100 in

12:28

on something you have to be open to all

12:30

possible scenarios but anyway

12:31

she believes that the fed's going to

12:33

change trajectories and and they're

12:34

going to end up raising rates

12:35

sooner rather than later and that's one

12:37

of the reasons she is bullish on

12:39

bitcoin but it's also one of her

12:41

explanations for

12:43

well that is why we might potentially

12:45

see some volatility in

12:46

stocks like the tech sector genomic

12:49

sector as the market begins to price in

12:51

rates which we just saw in this last

12:53

week

12:53

now there is a flip side though and this

12:56

is the side that i'm a little bit more

12:58

inclined to believe in and this is the

12:59

side that

13:00

kathy wood also addresses which is very

13:02

important because

13:03

it totally makes sense and this has to

13:05

do with the decline in the velocity of

13:07

money

13:08

so this is something we've gone deep on

13:10

as well before on this channel but

13:12

the easiest way to explain the velocity

13:14

of money and to kind of show this

13:15

alternate scenario so if scenario number

13:18

one is fed changes their opinion they

13:20

raise rates sooner than expected then

13:21

scenario number two

13:22

is the fed doesn't raise rates right we

13:24

go with with the more like

13:26

kevin fed strategy of let's wait until

13:28

2024. and again i'm not trying to like

13:30

align myself 100 with one direction i'm

13:32

just leaning more towards i don't think

13:34

the fed's going to raise rates anytime

13:35

soon

13:35

anyway in that scenario which kathy wood

13:37

addresses she believes the velocity of

13:39

money can stay low

13:40

and maybe we don't actually have to

13:42

raise rates and here's an easy example

13:44

for this

13:44

let's say there are 100 of us in a

13:47

classroom

13:48

so kind of think about it like a college

13:50

lecture hall okay so there are a hundred

13:51

of us in a classroom

13:52

let's say every single one of us has one

13:55

billion

13:56

dollars that is one of these little

13:58

pieces of paper right here represents

13:59

one billion dollars now let's say we

14:02

all buy something from each other 10

14:06

times

14:06

in other words i buy you or i buy a cup

14:09

of coffee from you for a billion dollars

14:10

then you take my billion dollars and you

14:12

go buy i don't know toilet paper for a

14:14

billion dollars whatever

14:15

the point is all of our money circulates

14:17

in our little

14:18

economy in this lecture hall 10 times so

14:21

now we've kind of created this

14:23

lecture hall economy well if we have 100

14:25

people

14:26

and our money exchanges hands 10 times

14:29

and we each have

14:30

a billion dollars then we take 100

14:32

billion times 10

14:33

and we have a 1 trillion dollar economy

14:35

okay cool

14:36

well now let's say we get somebody like

14:38

uh mr j powell

14:40

and he's got a money printer and he

14:41

walks in the room as a substitute

14:43

teacher for the day

14:44

and uh he cranks out you know what

14:47

jerome powell cranks

14:48

cold hard cash what else and he doubles

14:51

the money we all have

14:52

so all of a sudden now instead of having

14:54

one billion dollars we actually have

14:56

two billion dollars which means we've

14:59

doubled the amount of money that we have

15:01

which means in theory instead of just

15:02

buying one coffee i could buy twice as

15:04

many coffees

15:05

and if i were to buy twice as many

15:06

coffees the price of that coffee might

15:08

go up

15:09

because there might be so much more

15:10

demand on coffee the price of coffee

15:12

might go up which means there might be

15:13

inflation

15:14

but what if maybe i double my money

15:18

but now i go ahead and save and invest

15:21

the other half

15:23

and maybe even a little bit more and i

15:26

actually only circulate like 700

15:29

million of my billion dollars instead of

15:31

the full two billion dollars or even the

15:33

full one billion that i before

15:34

and now i'm actually exchanging less

15:37

money that's circulating

15:38

well now even though we've printed more

15:40

money our economy is actually in this

15:42

more extreme example here shrunk our

15:45

economy went from a one trillion dollar

15:46

economy

15:47

to us each only circulating 700 million

15:49

dollars meaning we've gone to a 700

15:51

billion dollar economy

15:52

so we actually had a decline in gdp

15:55

which means

15:55

less demand for products and services

15:58

which means potentially less pressure on

15:59

inflation

16:00

which means prices could actually come

16:02

down despite the fact that we now have

16:04

way more money and that that's a very

16:07

real possibility

16:08

because this is something that i've

16:09

mentioned often on this channel during

16:11

this pandemic is

16:12

in my opinion we could be going into

16:14

something that i call the frugal decade

16:16

which is where we actually save

16:17

and invest more than we spend

16:21

it's kind of like what i showed here

16:24

we're sure we have maybe

16:25

more money but we save and invest this

16:27

and then you know we don't need to spend

16:29

this we just we just don't need to spend

16:30

that much money let's put that away we

16:31

still got money to spend we're still

16:32

gonna go on vacations and stuff we're

16:34

still gonna have a reopening boom but

16:36

if the velocity of money goes down

16:38

inflation might not actually

16:39

happen and if inflation doesn't actually

16:42

happen

16:42

then the fed won't have to raise rates

16:44

as much and they can continue to fight

16:45

unemployment

16:46

which is their goal after all that is

16:48

part of their dual mandate

16:50

and arguably it is one of the most

16:51

important parts of their dual mandate

16:53

price stability and unemployment and we

16:55

want to see unemployment as low as

16:56

possible

16:57

so in other words kathy wood is bullish

17:01

in an environment where rates go up

17:03

because she believes in innovation

17:04

but she's also bullish in an environment

17:06

where rates stay low because if rates

17:08

stay low well that's just going to keep

17:09

pumping money into the stock market

17:11

anyway

17:12

and so no matter how you slice the

17:14

inflation debate

17:15

kathy wood is like look tech and

17:17

innovation okay like how many different

17:18

times we're gonna have to explain the

17:20

same freaking thing tech and innovation

17:21

okay

17:22

and one of the reasons she's so bullish

17:23

on tech and innovation is because she

17:25

believes

17:25

that electric vehicle companies become

17:28

more

17:29

efficient for every doubling

17:32

of output and this is kind of

17:34

interesting she says look when the ev

17:35

industry doubles their output

17:37

they become 28 more efficient every time

17:40

they double

17:40

28 28 28 and i'm sure there's some kind

17:43

of declining scale to that but still

17:44

that that doubling in efficiency

17:46

huge because that means profits that

17:48

means 10 d's yes and we all like tendees

17:51

in the dna sequency sequencing

17:53

industries she actually believes that's

17:55

more like

17:55

a 40 increase in efficiency

17:59

now kathy also reiterated her belief in

18:01

bitcoin

18:02

suggesting that uh energy costs are a

18:05

non-issue

18:06

relative to the traditional banking

18:08

system which uses a lot of energy

18:10

or even compared to the energy it takes

18:12

to mine gold for

18:14

example and she does view bitcoin as a

18:16

digital

18:17

gold she believes the use cases for

18:19

bitcoin are just beginning and even

18:20

though bitcoin might be a little bit

18:21

slower

18:22

than smart contracts at ethereum she

18:24

believes bitcoin is the safest

18:25

cryptocurrency there there is

18:27

and she basically went on to call and

18:29

and she didn't because kathy was very

18:30

nice but she kind of basically went on

18:32

to call

18:33

jane yellen a boomer and kind of

18:35

suggested that janie yellen doesn't

18:36

really understand

18:37

what the heck she's talking about with

18:38

bitcoin yet and don't you worry

18:40

bitcoin's still going to 400 thousand

18:42

dollars now

18:43

all of this could have just been the

18:44

biggest defense for

18:46

kathy wood and maybe i'm just

18:47

perpetuating that defense i don't invest

18:49

in kathy woods funds

18:50

but you know i tend to agree with a lot

18:53

of her perspectives i'm a little bit

18:54

more

18:55

on the side that we're not going to see

18:57

inflation as quickly i'm kind of on the

18:58

side that we're going to have this

18:59

frugal decade and see less

19:00

uh you know less velocity of money could

19:03

be wrong there but but then again i'm

19:05

like

19:05

i would say like 80 20 uh you know 80

19:08

leaning towards less inflation 20

19:10

keeping the door open and we'll see that

19:12

can change over time

19:13

and of course kathy wood appears to be

19:16

somewhere maybe closer to like 50

19:18

50 on that maybe she's even like no i'm

19:21

like 60

19:22

the fed's gonna raise rates sooner

19:23

rather than later she's kind of treading

19:25

lightly there in terms of which side

19:27

she's actually on

19:28

not that it really matters i mean the

19:30

slight differences don't matter i think

19:31

we're both still going to be investing

19:33

in genomics and tech because the sectors

19:35

are freaking

19:36

awesome and innovation it's great but uh

19:39

yeah there you have it so this was

19:40

either

19:41

a uh fully detailed advertisement for

19:43

arc i'm not sponsored or affiliated with

19:45

arc in all transparency here

19:47

or hopefully this was educational for

19:49

you and i want to know do you agree with

19:51

kathy

19:52

or has she lost her mind is she missing

19:54

something completely

19:55

and are we instead going to see a more

19:58

reverse of what i've just described

20:01

where we see maybe a peter schiff style

20:04

future where the fed doesn't think about

20:07

raising rates the fed actually can't

20:10

raise rates

20:11

instead they need to print more money

20:14

because the dollar is collapsing and we

20:17

have much larger economic issues because

20:20

all of our wealth is relatively

20:21

disappearing unless of course we're

20:22

trying to protect ourselves in stock

20:24

market

20:24

or assets but ideally not dollar

20:26

denominated assets but then again

20:28

now we're really opening pandora's box

20:30

and i did just have a two hour interview

20:32

with peter schiff

20:33

so i think i'm not doing that justice by

20:35

talking about that for about 30 seconds

20:36

at the end of a kathy wood interview

20:38

video not interview video anywho if you

20:41

found this helpful

20:42

make sure to share consider subscribing

20:44

to the channel and folks we'll see in

20:45

the next one

20:49

[Music]

20:56

you

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.