TRANSCRIPTEnglish

44 Harsh Truths About The Game Of Life - Naval Ravikant (4K)

3h 16m 21s42,246 words6,191 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Happiness is being satisfied with what

0:02

you have. Success comes from

0:04

dissatisfaction.

0:06

Is success worth it then? Oof. I'm not

0:09

sure that statement is true anymore.

0:12

Like I made that statement a long time

0:13

ago and a lot of these things are just

0:15

notes to myself and they're highly

0:17

contextual. They come in the moment,

0:18

they leave in the moment.

0:21

Happiness. Okay. So very complicated

0:23

topic but I always like the Socrates

0:26

story where he goes into the marketplace

0:28

and they show him all these luxuries and

0:30

fineries and he says how many things

0:32

there are in this world that I do not

0:33

want right and that's a form of freedom

0:35

so not wanting something is as good as

0:38

having it in the old story with

0:40

Alexander Dionius right Alexander goes

0:42

out and conquers the world and he meets

0:44

Dionius who's living in a barrel and

0:45

Dionius says get out of the way you're

0:47

blocking my son and Alexander says oh

0:50

how I wish I you know could be like

0:51

Dionius the next life and Dionis says

0:54

that's the difference I don't wish that

0:55

I could sorry Dioynes Dioynes Dioynes

0:57

says I I I don't wish to be Alexander so

1:00

two paths to happiness and uh one path

1:04

is success you get what you want you

1:06

satisfy your material needs or like

1:07

Dioynes you just don't want in the first

1:09

place and I'm not sure which one is more

1:12

valid um

1:15

and it also depends what you define as

1:16

success if the end goal is happiness

1:18

then why not cut to the chase and just

1:20

go straight for

1:21

uh does being happy make you less

1:24

successful? That is a conventional

1:25

wisdom. That may even be the practical

1:28

earned experience of your reality. You

1:29

find that when you're happy, you don't

1:30

want anything. So, you don't get up and

1:32

do anything. On the other hand, you

1:34

know, you still got to do something.

1:36

You're an animal. You're here. You're

1:37

here to survive. You're here to

1:38

replicate. You're driven. You're

1:41

motivated. You're going to do something.

1:42

You're not just going to sit there all

1:43

day. Unlikely. Some people do. Maybe

1:45

it's in their nature. But I think most

1:47

people still want to act. they want to

1:50

live in the arena. Uh I found for myself

1:53

as I've become uh happier is a big word,

1:56

but you know, more peaceful, more calm,

1:58

more present, more uh satisfied with

2:00

what I have, uh I still want to do

2:02

things. I just want to do bigger things.

2:04

I want to do things that are more pure,

2:06

more aligned with uh what I think needs

2:09

to be done and what I can uniquely do.

2:11

So in that sense, I think that being

2:13

happier can actually make you more

2:15

successful, but your definition of

2:17

success will likely change along the

2:18

way.

2:19

Is that a realization you think you

2:21

could have gotten to had you have not

2:22

had some success in the first place?

2:26

At least for me, I always wanted to take

2:30

the path of material success first. I

2:33

was not going to go be an aesthetic and

2:34

sit there and renounce everything. That

2:36

just seems too unrealistic and too

2:38

painful. Uh, in the story of Buddha, he

2:41

starts out as a prince and then he sees

2:43

that it's all kind of meaningless

2:44

because you're still going to get old

2:45

and die and then he goes into the woods

2:47

looking for something more.

2:50

I'll take the happy route that involves

2:53

material success. Thank you.

2:54

I think it's quicker in some ways. You

2:57

know, one of your uh insights is it's

3:00

far easier to achieve our material

3:01

desires than it is to renounce them.

3:04

And uh

3:04

it depends on the person, but I I think

3:07

you have to try that path. If you want

3:08

something, go get it. Uh, you know, like

3:11

I I I quipped that the reason to win the

3:13

game is to be free of it. So, you you

3:16

play the games, you win the games, and

3:18

then you get hopefully you get bored of

3:19

the games. You don't want to just keep

3:20

looping on the same game over and over.

3:22

Although a lot of these games are very

3:23

enticing and have many levels and are

3:25

relatively open-ended.

3:27

Uh, and then you become free of the game

3:29

uh in a sense that you're no longer

3:31

trying to win it. You know, you can win

3:33

it. Uh, and either you move to a

3:35

different game or you play the game for

3:37

the sheer joy of it.

3:39

Yeah. You, another one of yours, most of

3:41

the gains in life come from suffering in

3:43

the short term so you can get paid in

3:44

the long term. I think

3:46

that's classic.

3:47

Winning the marshmallow test on a daily

3:49

basis. But, uh, there's an interesting

3:51

challenge where I think people need to

3:52

avoid becoming uh, a suffering addict.

3:55

Sort of using suffering as the proxy for

3:58

progress as opposed to the outcome of

4:01

the suffering. Right? It's like I was in

4:03

pain not eating the marshmallow. I was

4:06

in pain doing this work. I have attached

4:10

well-being and satisfaction to pain, not

4:13

to what the pain gets me on the other

4:14

side of it. If you define pain as

4:17

physical pain, then it's a real thing.

4:19

It happens and you can't ignore it. But

4:21

that's not what we mean by suffering.

4:23

Suffering is mostly mental anguish and

4:24

mental pain. And it just means you don't

4:26

want to do the task at hand. Uh if you

4:29

were fine doing the task at hand, then

4:30

you wouldn't be suffering. And then the

4:32

question is what's more effective to

4:34

suffer along the way or just to

4:35

interpret it in a way that it's not

4:36

suffering?

4:38

You hear from a lot of successful people

4:39

they look back and they say oh the

4:41

journey was the fun part right that was

4:42

actually the entertaining part and I

4:44

should have enjoyed it more.

4:45

It's a common regret. Uh there's a

4:47

little thought exercise I like to do,

4:49

which is you can go back into your own

4:52

life and uh try to put yourself in the

4:55

exact position you were in 5 years ago,

4:57

10 years ago, 15 years ago, 20 years

4:59

ago. And you try to remember, okay, who

5:01

was I with? What was I doing? What was I

5:03

feeling? What were my emotions? What

5:05

were my objectives? And really, really

5:07

try to transport yourself back and see

5:10

if there's any advice you'd give

5:11

yourself. Anything you do differently.

5:12

Now, you don't have new information. And

5:14

don't pretend you could have gone back

5:15

and, you know, bought a stock or bought

5:17

bought Bitcoin or whatever, but just

5:20

knowing what you know now in terms of

5:21

your temperament and a little bit of age

5:24

related experience,

5:26

how would you have done things

5:27

differently? And I think it's a

5:29

worthwhile exercise to do. So don't let

5:30

me rob you of the conclusion, but I'll

5:32

tell you for me uh

5:36

I would have done everything the same

5:38

except I would have done it with less

5:39

anger, less emotion, less internal

5:41

suffering because that was optional. It

5:43

wasn't necessary.

5:45

And I would argue that someone who can

5:47

do the job uh at least peacefully but

5:50

maybe happily is going to be more

5:51

effective than someone who has

5:53

unnecessary emotional turmoil.

5:55

Well, you end up with a series of

5:57

miserable successes, right? The outcome

6:00

may have been the same, but the entire

6:02

experience of getting there

6:04

and and the journey is not only the

6:05

reward. The journey is the only thing

6:06

there is. You know, even success, it's

6:09

human nature to bank it very very

6:12

quickly, right? Because the normal loop

6:14

that we run through is you sit around,

6:16

you're bored, then you want something,

6:18

then when you want something, you decide

6:20

you're not going to be happy until you

6:21

get that thing. Then you start your bout

6:24

of suffering or anticipation while you

6:26

strive to get that thing. If you get

6:28

that thing, then you get used to it and

6:30

then you get bored again. Then a few

6:31

months later, you want something else.

6:33

And if you don't get it, then you're

6:34

unhappy for a bit and then you get over

6:36

it and then you want something else.

6:37

Right? That's the normal cycle. So

6:40

whether you're happy or unhappy at the

6:42

end, it tends not to last. Now I don't

6:44

want to be glib and say that oh there's

6:46

no point in making money or being

6:48

successful. There absolutely is. Money

6:49

solves all your money problems. So it is

6:51

good to have money. Um that said there

6:54

are those uh those stories. I I don't

6:56

know if you've seen those studies. I

6:57

don't know how real these are. A lot of

6:58

these psych studies don't replicate, but

7:00

it's a fun fun little study that shows

7:02

that uh people who break their back and

7:04

people who win the lottery are back to

7:06

their baseline happiness two years

7:08

later. Yep. Again, I don't know if

7:10

that's entirely true. I think money can

7:12

buy you happiness if you earned it

7:14

because then along the way you have both

7:17

pride and confidence in yourself and you

7:19

have a sense of accomplishment and you

7:22

you know set out to do something and you

7:23

were right. So I I'll bet that lingers

7:25

and then as I said money solves your

7:26

money problem. So I don't want to be too

7:28

glib about it but I would say in general

7:30

this this loop that we run through um of

7:33

desire, dopamine, fulfillment,

7:35

unfulfillment like you you have to enjoy

7:37

the journey. The journey is all there

7:38

is, right? 99% of your time is spent on

7:40

the journey. So, what kind of a journey

7:42

is it if you're not going to enjoy it?

7:43

How do you shortcut that desire

7:45

contract?

7:48

You could focus, you could decide that I

7:50

don't want most things. I think we have

7:52

a lot of unnecessary desires that we

7:54

just pick up everywhere. We have

7:56

opinions on everything, judgments and

7:57

everything. Uh so, I think just knowing

8:00

that those are the source of unhappiness

8:02

uh will make you be choosy about your

8:04

desires. And frankly, if you want to be

8:06

successful, you have to be choosy about

8:08

your desires. You have to focus.

8:09

You can't be great at everything.

8:10

You can't be great at everything. You're

8:12

just going to waste your energy and

8:13

waste your time.

8:14

Is fame a worthwhile goal?

8:18

Uh, it gets you invited to better

8:19

parties,

8:21

gets you into better restaurants. Uh,

8:24

fame. So, fa fame is this funny thing

8:26

where a lot of people know you, but you

8:27

don't know them. And, uh, it does get

8:30

you put on a pedestal. Uh, it can get

8:32

you what you want, uh, at a at a

8:34

distance. So, I wouldn't say it's

8:35

worthless. Obviously, people want it for

8:37

a reason. Um, it's high status, so it

8:39

attracts the opposite sex. Uh,

8:41

especially for men, it attracts women.

8:43

Uh, that said, it is high cost. It means

8:45

you have no privacy. Um, you do have

8:48

weirdos and lunatics. Uh, you do get hit

8:50

up a lot for weird things. Uh, and

8:53

you're on a stage, so you're forced to

8:55

perform, so you're forced to be

8:56

consistent with your past proclamations

8:58

and actions, and you're going to have

8:59

haters and all that nonsense. But the

9:01

fact that we do it, the fact that we all

9:04

seem to want it means that it would be

9:06

disingenuous to say, "Oh, no, no, I'm

9:08

famous." But you don't want to be

9:08

famous.

9:10

Um, that said, I think fame, like

9:12

anything else, is best produced as a or

9:15

pursued as a byproduct of something

9:18

potentially more worthwhile. Um, wanting

9:21

to be famous and craving to be famous

9:23

and being famous for being famous, these

9:25

are sort of traps.

9:26

Fame for fame's sake.

9:27

Yeah. Exactly. So, it's better that it's

9:29

earned fame. Uh so for example earn

9:31

respect in the tribe is you do things

9:33

that are good for the tribe. Uh who are

9:35

the most famous people in human history?

9:37

Uh there uh you know there there are

9:40

people who sort of transcended the self.

9:42

The Buddhas and the Jesuses and the

9:44

Muhammads of the world. Who else is

9:45

famous? Uh the artists are famous. You

9:48

know art lasts for a long time. The

9:49

scientists are famous. They discover

9:51

things. The conquerors are famous

9:53

presumably because they conquered for

9:54

their tribe. There was someone that they

9:56

were fighting for. So generally the

9:59

higher up you rise by doing things for

10:01

greater and greater groups of people

10:03

even though it may be considered

10:04

tyrannical or negative like uh you know

10:07

Jenghaskhan is famous but uh to the

10:09

Mongols he was doing good to the rest of

10:10

them not so much uh

10:14

the higher level you're operating at the

10:16

more people you're taking care of the

10:18

more you sort of earn respect and fame

10:20

and I think those are good reasons to be

10:22

famous if if if fame is empty if you're

10:24

famous just cuz your name showed up in a

10:26

lot of places or your face showed up in

10:27

a lot of places then that's a hollow

10:30

fame and I think deep down you will know

10:31

that and so it'll be fragile and you'll

10:33

always be afraid of losing it and then

10:34

you'll be forced to perform

10:36

so the kind of fame that uh pure actors

10:39

and celebrities have I wouldn't want but

10:41

the kind of fame that's earned because

10:42

you did something useful

10:44

uh why dodge that now you can there's a

10:48

challenge I think especially if people

10:49

make uh very loud public proclamations

10:52

about things you mentioned there about

10:54

um you're almost hostage to the things

10:57

that you used to say that um being able

11:00

to update your opinions and change your

11:02

mind looks very similar to the internet

11:05

as hypocrisy does. No, no, no. The

11:08

difference between me saying something

11:09

in the past and saying something

11:10

different now is perhaps I've learned,

11:12

perhaps I've updated my beliefs, but so

11:14

few people do it in a legitimate way. I

11:17

think that the grifter shill you see

11:19

this is the the the smoking gun that

11:21

shows that he didn't really believe that

11:23

thing all along. Right.

11:24

And uh yeah, I I went to a retreat in LA

11:26

a couple of years ago and there was a

11:28

guy that I used to follow that a big um

11:32

business and productivity advice content

11:34

creator really really successful and he

11:36

just totally stepped back from

11:37

everything and went uh like monk mode

11:39

and focused on his business. I asked him

11:41

why and he said uh I started feeling

11:44

like I had to live up to in private the

11:46

things that I was saying in public.

11:47

Right.

11:48

Yeah. It's a it's a what was it that uh

11:51

who said it was a mein that um foolish

11:54

consistency is a hobgoblin of little

11:55

minds right um but essentially look all

12:00

life is all learning is error correction

12:02

right every knowledge creation system

12:03

works through correcting errors making

12:05

guesses and correcting errors so by

12:07

definition if you're learning you're

12:08

going to be wrong most of the time and

12:09

you'll be updating your priors and so

12:12

for example I did this Joe Rogan podcast

12:13

I don't know it's like eight or nine

12:14

years ago um and people will call out

12:18

like the one thing that didn't turn out

12:19

to be correct, right? And it's just like

12:21

and they just beat on it because it it

12:23

helps them in their mind raise their

12:25

status a little bit. Aha, I caught him

12:27

in an error. Well, I think if you catch

12:28

someone in a blatant lie where there's

12:30

believe one thing and they say another,

12:32

that's legit. That's a character flaw.

12:34

They shouldn't be lying. But on the

12:35

other hand, if they just made a guess at

12:37

something and they got it wrong. And by

12:38

the way, mostly it's about the AI AGI

12:40

thing. And I think I'm still right about

12:41

that, but it's a different story. Um

12:44

people who think we have achieved AGI

12:46

just fail a touring test from their

12:48

side. Um but uh

12:52

it's funny how people latch on to single

12:54

proclamations. But the reality is all of

12:56

us are dynamical systems. We're always

12:58

changing. We're always learning. We're

12:59

always growing. And uh hopefully we're

13:02

correcting errors. What you don't want

13:03

to be doing is lying in public so that

13:05

because you're you're trying to look

13:06

good. And I think people can smell that.

13:08

I I I what this world really lacks right

13:12

now is authenticity and because

13:14

everybody wants something. They want to

13:15

be seen as something. They want to be

13:17

something that they're not. And so you

13:20

do catch a lot of people uh saying

13:22

things that they don't really believe.

13:23

And I think people are very sensitive to

13:25

that.

13:25

Uh [ __ ] radars have become hypers

13:27

sensitized to try and work out whether

13:29

or not this person means the thing that

13:31

they're saying.

13:31

Yeah. I mean they they a lot of people

13:33

are wrong. Most of us are wrong most of

13:35

the time especially in any new endeavor.

13:37

Difference between being wrong and

13:38

disingenuous though, purposefully wrong.

13:40

Correct. Exactly. So I think I think

13:42

that's the big difference. If someone is

13:43

wrong, no big deal. As long as they have

13:45

a genuine reason for saying what they're

13:47

saying, or believing what they're

13:48

believing. But if they are lying to

13:51

elevate their status or their appearance

13:52

or to live up to some expectation,

13:54

that's the mistake. And that's a mistake

13:56

not just for the listener, it's a

13:57

mistake for themselves cuz then you're

13:58

going to get trapped in a hall of

14:00

mirrors. You yourself are going to be

14:01

consistent with your past proclamations.

14:03

So if you're lying to others, you're

14:04

going to be lying to yourself. You're

14:06

puppeted by a person that you are not

14:09

even.

14:09

That's right. Yeah. It's it's like what

14:12

was that line? There's you're you're

14:13

basically trying to impress people who

14:16

you know don't care about you. Um so

14:18

they don't like the real you and if they

14:20

saw the real you they wouldn't care and

14:21

the people who would like the real you

14:23

don't get to see the real you so they

14:24

pass you by

14:25

right? You only want the respect of the

14:27

very very few people that you respect.

14:29

Uh trying to demand respect from the

14:32

masses is a fool's errand.

14:35

status games, the allure of acrewing,

14:40

whether it's fame, actual fame, or just

14:42

the competition comparison trap, it's

14:44

always there. Uh there's a real draw of

14:46

being swayed by social approval. How

14:49

should people learn to get less

14:51

distracted by status games in that way?

14:55

I think it it just helps to see that

14:57

status games don't matter as much as

14:58

they used to. uh in old society, let's

15:02

go back hunter gatherer times, there was

15:03

no such thing as wealth. You just had

15:05

what you could carry. Um there was no

15:07

stored wealth. So wealth games didn't

15:09

really exist to wealth creation games.

15:11

All that existed was status games. If

15:13

you were high status, then you got what

15:15

little was available first. Um but even

15:18

back then, you had to earn your status

15:19

by taking care of the tribe. Uh now we

15:22

have wealth creation where you can

15:24

actually create a product or a service.

15:26

you can scale that product or service

15:27

and you can provide abundance for a lot

15:29

of people. Uh and that's not zero sum,

15:31

that's a positive sum game. I can be

15:33

wealthy, you can be wealthy, we can

15:34

create things together and clearly since

15:37

we are all collectively far far

15:38

wealthier than we were in huntergatherer

15:40

times. Uh wealth creation is positive

15:43

but status is limited. There's limited

15:45

status to go around. It's a ranking

15:46

ladder. It's a hierarchy. And so it's a

15:48

rise in status. Somebody else has a

15:50

lower in status. Now you can have

15:52

multiple kinds of status. So you can

15:53

expand some kinds of status, but it's

15:55

not like wealth creation where it can go

15:56

infinitely where we can all be, you

15:58

know, living in the stars and moon bases

16:00

or Mars colonies or what have you. So

16:03

just realize that status games are

16:05

inherently limited. Uh they're always

16:07

combative. Um they always require uh

16:11

direct combat whereas uh wealth creation

16:13

games can be just you're creating

16:15

products. You don't have to fight

16:17

anybody else. Yes, in the marketplace

16:18

your product has to succeed, but that's

16:20

not quite the same as uh invective

16:23

against other people or being angry with

16:24

other people or feeling pushed down or

16:26

pushed up or having a beef with

16:27

somebody.

16:28

So, I would argue that wealth creation

16:30

games are both more pleasant. Uh they're

16:32

positive sum and they actually have uh

16:34

concrete material returns. If you have

16:36

more money, you can buy more.

16:38

Show me where you can exchange your

16:39

status at the bank.

16:41

Exactly. Yeah. It's it's it's vague and

16:43

it's fuzzy. Now, you see people get

16:45

rich, they have money, what do they

16:46

want? They want status. So they go to

16:48

Hollywood, start starring in movies,

16:50

they donate to nonprofits, they go to KS

16:52

or Davos or what have you. Um, and they

16:54

start trying to trade the money for

16:56

status. So, you know, people always want

16:58

what they don't have. Uh, and we are

17:00

evolutionarily hardwired for status

17:02

because as I said, wealth creation

17:03

didn't really exist until the

17:05

agricultural revolution, uh, when you

17:07

could store grain and then the

17:08

industrial revolution took it to another

17:09

level and now the information age is

17:11

taking it to yet another level.

17:13

But there's never been an easier time to

17:15

make money. Yes, it's still hard, but

17:17

there's never been an easier time to

17:18

create wealth because there's so much

17:20

leverage out there. There's so much

17:21

opportunity. You still have to go find

17:23

it. It's not easy. It's not going to

17:24

fall on your lap, and you have to learn

17:25

something and know something and do

17:27

something interesting. But nevertheless,

17:28

it's possible to many more people.

17:32

A few hundred years ago, you were born a

17:33

surf, you were going to die a surf.

17:34

There was almost no way out of that.

17:36

That's changed. And so I would argue

17:39

that you're better off focusing on

17:41

wealth games and status games. If you're

17:43

trying to um build up, for example, your

17:46

following on a social network and get

17:47

famous and then get rich off of being

17:49

famous, that's a much harder path than

17:50

getting rich first.

17:52

Um and then go for your fame afterwards

17:54

would be my advice.

17:55

Well, a lot of people do that as you

17:57

said. It's funny how uh people who have

18:00

achieved such a level of wealth that you

18:02

don't think why do you need the status

18:03

given that most people use status to

18:05

then try and cash in to achieve wealth

18:06

if you've achieved [ __ ] money already

18:08

if you're post money or uh asset heavy

18:11

as it's known. Um why are you trying to

18:14

go in the other direction? Well, as you

18:16

said because we've we've got an

18:18

illustrious history biologically of

18:20

wanting status and wealth is kind of

18:23

novel.

18:24

It's new. It's new. Wealth is uh

18:26

something that you have to understand

18:27

more intellectually. Yeah, there's a

18:29

physical component, more food, more

18:31

survival, but uh to truly understand the

18:34

effects and the powers and the abilities

18:35

and limitations uh and the advantages

18:37

and disadvantages of wealth, you have to

18:39

use your neoortex a lot more.

18:41

Does that mean

18:42

it's not limbic?

18:43

The reason to play the game is to win

18:44

the game and be done with it is harder

18:46

to win and be done with for status than

18:48

it is for wealth.

18:50

That's a good observation. I had thought

18:51

that through, but you're right. Yeah, I

18:52

think that's right. I think you people

18:54

will always want more status. Uh but I

18:56

think you can be satisfied at a certain

18:57

level of wealth. Well, as well

19:00

you always have this sort of sense. This

19:03

is what leaderboards are, right? This is

19:04

the the billboard chart, right? And it

19:08

is zero sum and it is

19:10

I guess you know the Forbes richest

19:12

people on the planet thing.

19:14

That one's harder to climb the ladder

19:15

on. But uh the fact that for example

19:18

iTunes and YouTube can put you in

19:20

competition against your contemporaries

19:22

every single day and make you go up and

19:24

down and show you likes and comments and

19:26

ratings. This is how much you're up.

19:28

Exactly. They they keep you running on

19:30

that treadmill forever.

19:31

Jimmy Carr has this cool idea where he

19:33

says trajectory is more important than

19:34

position.

19:35

So if you are number 101 in the world

19:39

but last year you were number 200 versus

19:41

you're number two in the world but last

19:42

year you were number one. there is this

19:44

sense of the deceleration is very very

19:48

tangible and um it's

19:50

again it goes back to evolution you know

19:52

something that is bleeding eventually

19:53

dies unless you stop the bleeding so

19:55

you're you're hardwired not to lose what

19:57

you have and because we evolve in

19:59

conditions where we're so close to just

20:02

not surviving uh you don't want to give

20:04

anything up. It's hardwired into us to

20:06

not give anything up.

20:07

So you grip tightly.

20:08

That's right. If you struggle to stay

20:10

asleep because your body gets too hot or

20:12

too cold, this is going to help. Just

20:14

add an EightLe Pod 4 Ultra to your

20:16

mattress like a fitted sheet and it will

20:18

automatically cool down or warm up each

20:19

side of your bed up to 20°. It's got

20:22

integrated sensors that track your sleep

20:24

time, your sleep phases, your HRV, your

20:26

snoring, and your heart rate with 99%

20:28

accuracy. It even starts cooling or

20:30

heating your bed an hour before you get

20:32

into it. That is why eight has been

20:34

clinically proven to increase total

20:36

sleep up to 1 hour every night. Best of

20:38

all, they've got a 30-day sleep trial,

20:40

so you can buy it and sleep on it for 29

20:42

nights, and if you don't like it, they

20:43

will give you your money back. Plus,

20:45

they ship internationally. Right now,

20:47

you can get $350 off the Pod4 Ultra by

20:50

going to the link in the description

20:51

below or heading to

20:52

8LE.com/modernwisdism

20:54

and using the code modernwisdom a

20:56

checkout. That's eigle.com/modernwisdom

21:00

and modernwisdom a checkout. The worst

21:02

outcome in the world is not having

21:04

self-esteem.

21:06

Why? Yeah, that's a tough one. Uh, well,

21:10

I I I look at the people and I don't

21:13

want to offend anybody, but I look at

21:14

the people who don't like themselves,

21:17

and that's the toughest slot because

21:19

they're always wrestling with

21:20

themselves, and it's hard enough to face

21:22

the outside world. Um, and no one's

21:24

going to like you more than you like

21:25

yourself. So, if you're struggling with

21:27

yourself, then the outside world becomes

21:29

an insurmountable challenge. And it's

21:32

hard to say why people have low

21:33

self-esteem. It might be genetic. It

21:35

might just be circumstantial. A lot of

21:37

times I think it's cuz they just weren't

21:38

unconditionally loved as a child and

21:40

that sort of seeps in at a deep core

21:42

level. Um but self-esteem issues can be

21:46

the most limiting. Uh one interesting

21:48

thought is that you know to some extent

21:51

self-esteem is a reputation you have

21:53

with yourself. Um you're watching

21:55

yourself at all times. You know what

21:57

you're doing and you have your own moral

21:58

code. Everyone has a different moral

22:00

code. But if you don't live up to your

22:01

own moral code, the same code that you

22:03

hold others to, uh it will damage your

22:06

self-esteem. So perhaps one way to build

22:08

up your self-esteem is to live up to

22:10

your own code very rigorously. Have one

22:13

and then live up to it. Uh another way

22:15

to raise your self-esteem might be to do

22:17

things for others. Uh if I look back on

22:20

my life and you know what are the

22:22

moments that I'm actually proud of,

22:23

there's very far and few between and

22:25

it's not that often and it's not the

22:26

things you would expect. It's not the

22:28

material success. It's not having

22:30

learned this thing or that. It's when I

22:32

made a sacrifice for somebody or

22:34

something that I loved. And uh that's

22:36

when I'm actually ironically most proud.

22:38

Now that's through an explicit mental

22:40

exercise. But I'll bet you at some level

22:41

I'm recording that implicitly. So that

22:43

tells me that even if I am not being

22:45

loved and the way to create love is to

22:47

give love to to express love through

22:49

sacrifice and through duty.

22:51

And so I think doing things like that

22:52

can build up your self-esteem really

22:54

fast. It's interesting when you talk

22:56

about sacrifice because a lot of the

22:57

time people say, "I sacrificed so much

22:59

for my job." It's like, "Yeah, but that

23:01

was you sacrificing something that you

23:03

wanted less for something that you

23:04

wanted more as opposed to genuinely

23:06

taking some sort of cost." And uh yeah,

23:09

I wonder whether if self-esteem is you

23:14

adhering to your internal your your

23:16

actions and your values aligning um even

23:19

when it's difficult or perhaps even more

23:20

so when it's difficult. I wonder whether

23:23

there is a price that people who are

23:25

more introspective, high integrity pay

23:30

because you think well you've got this

23:33

uh

23:34

heavy set of overheads that you need to

23:36

pay in some way.

23:37

Well, if being ethical were profitable,

23:38

everybody would do it, right? So, uh you

23:42

at some level it does involve a

23:44

sacrifice. Uh but that sacrifice can

23:46

also be thought of as you're thinking

23:48

for the long term rather than the short

23:49

term. Um for example the virtues are the

23:52

set of uh virtues a set of beliefs that

23:55

if everybody in society followed them as

23:57

individuals it would lead to win-win

23:59

outcomes for everybody. So if I am

24:01

honest and you are honest then we can do

24:04

business more easily. We can interact

24:05

more easily because we can trust each

24:07

other. So even though there might be a

24:08

few liars in the system as long as there

24:10

aren't too many liars and too many

24:11

cheaters uh a high trust society where

24:14

everybody's honest is better off. And I

24:16

think a lot of the virtues work this way

24:17

right? If I don't go around sleeping

24:19

with your wife and you don't sleep with

24:20

mine and you know if I don't take all

24:22

the food that's at the table first and

24:23

so on, then we all get along better and

24:25

we can play win-win games. Uh in game

24:28

theory, the most famous game is

24:29

prisoners dilemma. But that's all about

24:31

everybody cheating and the Nash

24:32

equilibrium. The stable equilibrium

24:34

there is everybody cheats and you're for

24:36

the only way you can be you can play a

24:38

win-win game is if you have long-term

24:39

iterated moves. But that's not actually

24:42

the most common game played in society.

24:43

The most common game played as one

24:45

called a stags hunt where if we

24:47

cooperate, we can bring down a big stag

24:49

and both have big dinners, but if we

24:50

don't cooperate, then we have to go hunt

24:52

like rabbits and we each have small

24:53

dinners.

24:54

So most of uh and and that game has two

24:57

stable equilibriums. And one could be

24:59

where we're both hunting the rabbit and

25:01

one could be where we're hunting the

25:02

stag. So the high trust society is a

25:04

more most more virtuous society where I

25:06

can trust you to come hunt the stag with

25:08

me and show up on time and do the work

25:09

and divide it up properly. So you want

25:12

to live in a system where everybody has

25:14

their own set of virtues and follows

25:16

them and then we all win. But I would

25:19

argue you don't need to do that for

25:21

sacrifice. You don't need to do that for

25:22

other people. You can do it just purely

25:24

for yourself. You will have higher

25:26

self-esteem. You will attract other high

25:28

virtue people.

25:29

Would I go on a stag hunt with me?

25:31

Correct. Yeah, that's right. And if

25:33

you're the kind of person, if you're the

25:35

kind of person who long-term signals

25:37

ethics and virtues, then you will

25:39

attract other people who are ethical and

25:42

virtuous. Whereas, if you are a shark,

25:44

you will eventually find yourself

25:46

swimming entirely amongst sharks. And

25:47

that's an unpleasant existence. But

25:49

again, this goes back to the equivalent

25:51

of the marshmallow test. And by the way,

25:53

the marshmallow test does not replicate.

25:54

I saw it replication crisis hard

25:57

recently.

25:58

But it is about trading off the short

26:00

term for the long term. Uh, and so I

26:02

think for a lot of these so-called

26:04

virtues, there are long-term selfish

26:06

reasons to be virtuous.

26:09

Yeah. Uh, did you deal with self-doubt

26:13

in the past? Is that something that was

26:15

a hurdle for you to overcome?

26:17

Yes and no. I think I I dealt with

26:19

self-doubt in the sense that, oh, I

26:21

don't know what I'm doing and I need to

26:23

figure it out. Um, but I didn't doubt

26:27

myself in the way of somebody else knows

26:29

better than me for me or that, you know,

26:31

I'm an idiot or I'm not worthwhile or

26:33

anything that I I guess I had the

26:35

benefit of I grew up with a lot of love

26:37

like the people around me love me

26:38

unconditionally. And so that just gave

26:41

me a lot of confidence. Uh, not the kind

26:43

of confidence that would say I have the

26:45

answer, but the kind of confidence that

26:47

I will figure it out and I know what I

26:49

want or only I am a good arbiter of what

26:52

I want.

26:53

Yeah. That level of self-belief, I

26:55

suppose, allows you to determine what is

26:57

it that matters to me, my self-esteem,

27:00

should I chase this thing or not? I can

27:02

make a fair judgment on that as opposed

27:04

to being so swayed. But it's such a good

27:06

point about even if you think you're not

27:08

consciously logging the stuff that

27:11

you're doing, there is some that's in

27:13

the back of your mind. Was it the Damon?

27:15

Is that what the ancient Greeks or

27:17

something used to talk about?

27:18

Yeah. The Yeah. Also in computer science

27:20

like there's a concept of a demon which

27:22

is a uh a program that's always running

27:24

in the background. You can't see it.

27:26

Okay.

27:26

Um but yeah, it probably comes from the

27:28

ancient Greek demon. Uh but yeah, I what

27:32

you know that you don't even know you

27:35

know is far greater than what you know

27:37

you know, right? You can't even

27:38

articulate most of the things you know.

27:40

There are feelings you have that have no

27:42

words for them. There are thoughts you

27:44

have that are felt within the body or

27:46

subconsciously that you never articulate

27:48

to yourself. You don't really you can't

27:50

articulate the rules of grammar yet you

27:52

exercise them effortlessly when you

27:54

speak. So I would argue that your

27:56

implicit knowledge and your knowledge

27:58

that is unknown to yourself is far

27:59

greater than the knowledge you can

28:00

articulate and that you can communicate.

28:03

And

28:05

so at some level you're always watching

28:06

yourself. That's what your consciousness

28:08

is, right? It's the thing that's

28:09

watching everything including your mind,

28:10

including your body. M

28:12

so if you want to uh have high

28:15

self-esteem then earn your own

28:17

selfrespect.

28:19

I had this idea the internal golden

28:20

rule. So the golden rule says treat

28:22

others the way that you should be

28:24

treated. You want to be treated. The

28:26

internal golden rule says treat yourself

28:28

like others should have treated you

28:30

and it was a a repost to maybe people

28:34

that didn't grow up with unconditional

28:36

love. Yeah.

28:37

In that way. On the love thing, one of

28:40

the interesting things about love is you

28:41

can try to remember the feeling of being

28:44

loved. So go back to when someone was in

28:47

love with you or someone did love you

28:49

and like really remember that feeling

28:51

like really sit with it and try to

28:52

recreate it within yourself and then go

28:54

to the feeling of you loving someone and

28:58

when you were in love. And I'm not even

29:00

talking about romantic love necessarily.

29:02

So be a little careful there. I'm

29:03

talking more about like love for

29:04

it can sometimes get complex if you're

29:06

talking about past romantic love,

29:07

right? a sibling or a child or something

29:09

like that or or a parent and uh think

29:12

about when you felt love towards someone

29:14

or something. And now which is better?

29:18

And I would argue that the feeling of

29:20

being in love is actually more

29:22

exhilarating than the feeling of being

29:24

loved. Being loved is a little clawing.

29:26

It's a little too sweet. You kind of

29:27

want to push the person away. It's a

29:29

little embarrassing. And you know that

29:31

if that person is too much into it that

29:32

you feel constrained. On the other hand,

29:34

the feeling of being in love is very

29:36

expansive. It's very open. It actually

29:38

makes you a better version of yourself.

29:39

It makes you want to be a better person.

29:41

And so you can create love anytime you

29:44

want. It's just that craving to receive

29:46

it. That's the problem.

29:47

The most expensive trait is pride. How

29:49

come?

29:50

Oh, that was a recent one. Uh I I

29:52

tweeted that just because I think that

29:56

uh pride is the enemy of learning. So

29:57

when I look at my friends and

29:59

colleagues, the ones who are still stuck

30:01

in the past and have grown the least are

30:03

the ones who were the proudest because

30:06

they sort of feel like they already had

30:08

the answers. And so they don't want to

30:09

correct themselves publicly. And so this

30:12

goes back to the fame conversation. You

30:13

get locked into something you said. It

30:15

made you famous. You're known for that.

30:16

And now you want to pivot or change.

30:18

So pride prevents you from saying I'm

30:20

wrong. It

30:21

What's pride in this context here?

30:23

It could be as simple as you're trading

30:25

stocks and then you don't admit you were

30:26

wrong. So you hang on to a lousy trait.

30:29

Uh it could be that you uh made a

30:31

decision to uh you know marry someone or

30:34

move somewhere or enter a profession, it

30:36

doesn't work out and then you don't want

30:37

to admit that you were wrong so you get

30:39

stuck in it. Uh it's mostly about

30:41

getting trapped in local maxima as

30:43

opposed to going back down and climbing

30:44

up the mountain again.

30:45

Mhm. And that's why it's an expensive

30:47

trade because you continue to need to

30:48

repay it in one form or another.

30:50

Yeah. You're you're just stuck at a

30:51

suboptimal point. Uh it's going to cost

30:54

you money. it's going to cost you

30:55

success

30:56

and time

30:56

and time. Uh the great artists always

30:58

have this ability to start over whether

31:00

it's Paul Simon or Madonna or you two

31:03

and I'm dating myself a little bit. Um

31:05

but even the great entrepreneurs,

31:06

they're just always willing to start

31:08

over. Uh I'm always struck by the Elon

31:10

Musk story where, you know, he uh he did

31:13

PayPal as X.com originally. Actually, it

31:15

was his his financial institution that

31:17

got merged into PayPal.

31:19

It's good that you've got the domain.

31:20

You know what I mean?

31:21

Yeah, exactly. I'll park that. I'll hold

31:22

on.

31:23

He's consistent. He's been using it for

31:24

quite a while. Um, and he said something

31:27

like along the lines of, uh, I made $200

31:30

million from the sale of PayPal. I put

31:32

$100 million into SpaceX, 80 million

31:34

Tesla, 20 into Solar City, and I had to

31:36

borrow money for rent. Right? This guy

31:38

is a perennial risk taker. He's always

31:40

willing to start over. He doesn't have

31:41

any pride about being seen as successful

31:43

or being seen as a failure. He's willing

31:45

to put it all in.

31:46

Back himself again each time.

31:47

Back himself again each time. But the

31:49

key thing is he's always willing to

31:50

start over, right? even now when he's

31:53

sort of made his his new startup is a

31:55

USA, right? He's basically trying to fix

31:58

it like he would fix one of his

31:59

startups. And I think that is a

32:02

willingness to look like a fool and that

32:04

is a willingness to start over. And a

32:06

lot of people just don't have that. They

32:07

become successful or they become rich or

32:09

they become famous and that's it.

32:10

They're stuck. They don't want to go

32:11

back to zero. And creating anything

32:14

great requires zero to one. And that

32:16

means you go back to zero and that's

32:18

really painful and hard to do. Talking

32:20

about risk, something I've been thinking

32:22

about a lot to do with you. Any moment

32:26

when you're not having a good time, when

32:28

you're not really happy, you're not

32:30

doing anyone any favors. I think lots of

32:32

people have become

32:34

unusually familiar with suffering

32:37

silently in that sort of a way of not

32:39

having

32:41

a high bar for your expectation for

32:44

quality of life. Uh yeah, a lot of it is

32:46

just you're memeing yourself into a bad

32:48

outcome because you think that somehow

32:50

suffering is glorious or that it makes

32:53

you a better person or you know my old

32:55

quip was if you're so smart why aren't

32:57

you happy? Why can't you figure that one

32:59

out? Um the reality is you can be smart

33:01

and happy. There are plenty of people in

33:02

human history who are smart and happy.

33:04

Uh and I think it just starts with

33:06

saying yeah you know what I'm I'm going

33:07

to be happy. There was a guy that I met

33:09

in Thailand a long time ago and uh he

33:12

used to work for Tony Robbins. uh you

33:14

know he had a great attitude and uh we

33:17

were sitting around and he said you know

33:19

uh he said I realized one day that

33:22

someone out there had to be the happiest

33:25

person in the world like there just that

33:26

person just has to exist he said why not

33:28

me I'll take on that burden I'll be that

33:31

guy and I heard that I was like wow

33:33

that's pretty good that's a good frame

33:34

right he knew how to reframe things

33:36

and so I think a lot of happiness is

33:38

just a choice uh in the sense that you

33:40

make first you just identify yourself as

33:43

actually I'm going be a person that's

33:44

going to be happy. I'm going to figure

33:45

it out. And you just figure it out along

33:47

the way. You're not going to lose your

33:48

other predilictions. You're not going to

33:49

lose your ambition or your desire for

33:51

success. I think a lot of people have

33:53

this fear that, oh, if I'm happy, then I

33:54

won't want to be successful. No, you'll

33:56

just want to do things that are more

33:58

aligned with the happy version of you,

33:59

and you'll be successful at those

34:00

things. And believe me, the happy

34:02

version of you is not going to look back

34:03

at the unhappy version and say, "Oh man,

34:05

that that guy was going to be more

34:07

success. I wish I was him."

34:08

You're actually trying to be successful

34:10

so you'll be happy. That's the whole

34:11

point. you have you've gotten it

34:12

backwards.

34:13

You you unlocked one of my trap cards.

34:15

Um, one of my favorite insights is that

34:17

we sacrifice the thing we want for the

34:19

thing that's supposed to get it.

34:20

So, we sacrifice happiness in order to

34:22

be successful so that when we're finally

34:24

sufficiently successful, we can actually

34:25

be happy. And if you have some sort of

34:28

simultaneous equation and you just sort

34:30

of stripped success off from both sides,

34:33

the at least in my own life, I have not

34:36

found there to be a trade-off. If

34:37

anything, I have found that the happier

34:39

I get, the more I am going to do the

34:41

things that I'm good at and aligned with

34:43

and that will make me even happier. And

34:46

so, I actually end up more successful,

34:48

not less. The aligned with thing is

34:50

interesting. Uh, I'm going to try and

34:52

put this across as delicately as I can.

34:54

I would say from the bit of time that

34:56

we'd spent together, you have a really

34:58

interesting trait of

35:01

holistic selfishness. Uh, you're sort of

35:04

prepared to put yourself first. um you

35:06

seem largely unfazed by saying or doing

35:10

things that might might result in other

35:12

people feeling a little bit awkward if

35:13

it's truthful for you. Uh it's like

35:16

unapologetically self-prioritizing, I

35:19

guess. Yeah, I think everybody is. Uh

35:21

maybe unapologetic is the part that's

35:23

that's relatively uh rare, but I think

35:26

everybody puts themselves first. That's

35:27

just human nature. You're you're here

35:29

because you survive. You're a separate

35:31

organism.

35:31

That's interesting. I'm maybe. But I

35:33

know we like to virtue signal and

35:35

pretend we're doing it for each other.

35:36

How many how many times does somebody

35:37

say, "Yeah, of course. I'd love to come

35:39

to the wedding." They're like, "I don't

35:40

want to be at the [ __ ] wedding." How

35:41

many times does someone say, "How are

35:42

you doing today?" And they don't tell

35:43

you. How many

35:44

I don't go to weddings.

35:45

But this is my point.

35:46

So I don't think you're necessarily

35:47

right with that. I think that people do

35:49

I don't think they put themselves first.

35:51

I sometimes think that they they

35:52

compromise what it is that they want in

35:54

order to appease socially what's in

35:57

front of them.

35:59

Yeah. I just view it as you're wast

36:00

everyone's wasting their time on it. Um,

36:02

don't do something you don't want to do.

36:05

Why Why are you wasting your time?

36:06

There's so little time on this earth.

36:08

Life goes fast. What is it? 4,000 weeks.

36:10

That's your lifespan. Um, and and yes,

36:13

we hear that, but we don't remember it.

36:14

But, uh, I guess I'm keenly aware of how

36:17

little time I have, so I'm just not

36:18

going to waste it. How have you got more

36:21

comfortable at um,

36:25

being the unapologetic self-

36:27

prioritizer?

36:28

Yeah, I've gotten I've gotten utterly

36:29

more and more ruthless on it. Ma mainly

36:31

it's that I see or hear people's freedom

36:34

and then that liberates me further. So I

36:37

read a uh I read a blog post by uh P

36:40

Mark aka Mark Andre where he said don't

36:42

keep a schedule and I took that to

36:44

heart. So I deleted my calendar and I

36:46

don't keep a schedule. I try to remember

36:47

it all in my head. If I can't remember

36:48

it, I'm not going to add

36:49

I'm glad you got here on time.

36:51

Yeah, exactly. Um

36:53

I hate to look things up at the last

36:54

minute. Mhm.

36:55

Uh so, but ironically, I don't even know

36:57

if Mark himself follows that, but he

36:59

made the correct point. Uh I read a

37:01

little story about Jack Dorsey doing all

37:03

his business off his uh iPhone and iPad

37:06

and not even going into a Mac, and I

37:07

said, "Okay, I want to do that." So, I'm

37:08

going to operate through text messaging

37:10

and not put up my nasty email.

37:11

Does that feel like more freedom?

37:12

It does. Yeah. Cuz you're on the go. Um

37:15

so, I have a nasty email autoresponder

37:17

that says, "I don't check email and

37:18

don't text me either." Right. If you

37:20

need to find me, you'll find me.

37:21

Obviously, some of this is a luxury of

37:23

success, but some of these habits I

37:25

adopted long before actually the hostile

37:27

email autoresponder started a long time

37:29

ago. Um, I used to own the domain. I let

37:32

it go. I don't do coffee.com. I used to

37:34

reply from that email uh just so people

37:37

would get the point. But I stopped being

37:39

rude about it. Now I just ghost. I just

37:40

disappear. Um, my wife knows not to ever

37:44

uh book or schedule me for anything. Uh,

37:47

I'm not expect I'm not expected to go to

37:50

couples dinners. I'm not expect to go to

37:51

birthdays. I'm not expect to go to

37:53

weddings. If somebody tries to rope her

37:55

into having me show up, she says he

37:56

makes his own decisions. You got to ask

37:57

him directly.

37:58

What about vice

37:58

versa? Well, are you not killing

38:00

serendipity in a way that

38:02

No, no. I'm freeing up all my time. So,

38:03

my entire life is serendipity. I get to

38:05

interact with whoever I want, whenever I

38:07

want, wherever.

38:08

You'll hear the invite, but make the

38:09

decision because if you're if there's

38:12

fewer things in coming, you're assuming

38:13

that you know what's best for you to

38:15

anything in the future. So, I'll say,

38:16

"Okay, if that thing is interesting,

38:18

I'll see if I can get in that day when

38:20

I'm in the mood." But there's nothing

38:22

worse than something coming up that your

38:24

past self committed you to that your

38:26

present self doesn't want to do.

38:27

God damn it.

38:28

Past. Yeah. And then it destroys your

38:30

entire calendar. It destroys your your

38:32

day because there's like, oh, this 1

38:33

hour slot which is sitting like a turd

38:35

on my calendar that I have to like

38:37

schedule my whole day around. I can't do

38:38

anything the 20 minutes before, the 20

38:40

minutes afterwards.

38:41

Even for phone calls, if someone wants

38:42

to do a phone call, say, "Okay, just

38:44

text me when you're free. I'll text you

38:45

when I'm free." and we'll just do it on

38:46

the fly. It's a much better way of

38:48

living than this overly scheduled uh you

38:50

know cal.com or iical whatever.

38:53

The uh the overscheduled life is not

38:55

worth living.

38:55

It's not. I think it's a terrible way to

38:57

live life. That's not how we evolved.

38:58

It's not how we grew up. Um it's not how

39:00

how we were as children hopefully uh

39:02

unless you're a helicopter parent or a

39:04

tiger mom.

39:05

Um

39:06

your natural order is freedom. Uh I had

39:09

a friend who uh said to me once, you

39:12

know, uh I never want to have to be at a

39:14

specific place at a specific time. And I

39:16

was like, "Oh my god, that's freedom."

39:18

When I heard that, that changed my life

39:19

right there.

39:20

You still arm alarm clockless?

39:22

Yes, I'm alarm clockless. Today, I did

39:24

set my alarm clock just so I wouldn't

39:26

miss this.

39:27

Very important. Yeah. If you still,

39:28

but just so you know, I set the alarm

39:29

clock from 11:00 a.m. in case I was

39:31

stricken with a flu that day. I wasn't

39:34

going to set my alarm clock for 8:00

39:35

a.m. or 9:00 a.m. And sure enough, I got

39:37

up many hours before that.

39:39

Um, but it was sort of a backup

39:40

emergency alarm. In fact, sometimes when

39:42

I something

39:43

that I need to do, I don't want to look

39:46

at a calendar, so I'll just set an alarm

39:48

for it.

39:50

Just sink a little bit more into that

39:54

like kind of that [ __ ] you energy, that

39:56

self- prioritizing energy because I

39:58

think people rationally love the idea of

40:00

this. I'm going to do what only I want

40:01

to do. uh even if they've got the level

40:03

of freedom,

40:04

it's not [ __ ] you energy in the sense

40:05

that I think everyone should live their

40:07

life that way to the greatest extent

40:08

possible. Obviously, we have our

40:10

requirements around work and obligations

40:13

that are genuinely important to us. But

40:15

don't fritter away your life on randomly

40:18

scheduled things and things that aren't

40:20

important don't matter and events and

40:22

weddings and you know tedious dinners

40:25

with tedious people that you don't want

40:26

to go to. To the extent you can bring

40:28

freedom into your life, optimize for

40:30

that, you'll actually be more

40:31

productive. You won't just be happier

40:33

and more free. You will be more

40:34

productive because then you can focus on

40:36

what is in front of you, whatever the

40:37

biggest problem of that day. When I wake

40:40

up in the morning, uh the first 4 hours

40:42

are when I have the most energy and

40:44

that's when I want to solve all the hard

40:46

problems. And the next 4 hours are when

40:49

I kind of want to, you know, do some

40:51

more outdoorsy activities or I want to

40:52

work out or maybe I can, you know, have

40:55

some meetings, but I'll try to do those

40:57

last second based on whatever the day's

40:59

priorities demand. the last 4 hours I

41:01

kind of want to wind down. I want to

41:02

hang out with the kids and I want to

41:03

play games or read a book or something

41:05

like that.

41:06

So having that flexibility and freedom

41:08

is really important. So you can just put

41:11

whatever is most needed into the slot at

41:14

that moment. Uh and instead if I have

41:17

like a meeting at 2 p.m. and then I have

41:19

to like get a thing and some emails

41:21

done, I put that off till 6 p.m. I'm

41:23

rushing. I'm not going to be productive.

41:24

I'm not going to be uh

41:26

You're certainly not free.

41:27

You're not I'm definitely not free. But

41:29

also another thing that I really believe

41:31

is that inspiration is perishable. Act

41:33

on it immediately. So when you're

41:35

inspired to do something, do that thing.

41:37

If I'm inspired to write a blog post, I

41:39

want to do it at that moment. If I'm

41:40

inspired to send a tweet, I want to do

41:41

it at that moment. If I'm inspired to

41:42

solve a problem, I do it that moment. If

41:44

I'm inspired to read a book, I want to

41:45

read it right then. If I'm inspired to

41:46

solve a problem, I solve it right there.

41:48

If I want to learn something, I I do it

41:50

at the moment of curiosity. The moment

41:52

the curiosity arrives, I go learn that

41:53

thing immediately. I download the book.

41:55

I get on Google. I get on ChatGpt,

41:57

whatever. I will figure that thing out

41:59

on the spot and that's when the learning

42:01

happens. It doesn't happen because I've

42:03

scheduled time because I've set an hour

42:05

aside because when that time arrives I

42:07

might be in a different mood. I might

42:08

just want to do something different.

42:09

So I think that spontaneity is really

42:12

important. You're going to learn best

42:13

when you're having fun when you

42:14

generally are enjoying the process not

42:16

when you're forced to sit there and do

42:18

it. How much do you remember from

42:19

school? You know you were forced to

42:21

learn geography, history, mathematics on

42:23

this schedule at this time according to

42:24

this person. Didn't happen. All the

42:26

stuff that sticks with you is you

42:28

learned it when you wanted to, when you

42:30

genuinely had the desire. And that

42:32

freedom, that ability to act on

42:34

something the moment you want to is so

42:36

liberating that most of us go through

42:38

our lives with very very little tastes

42:40

of that. If you live your entire life

42:42

that way, that is a recipe for

42:43

happiness.

42:44

It feels like efficiency that that you

42:47

have

42:47

efficient also.

42:48

You have the inspiration that is going

42:50

to be the most frictionless time to ever

42:52

do that particular task. So, oh, I've

42:54

had the inspiration to do that. I'll put

42:56

that off until a time when I no longer

42:57

really want to do it quite so much. And

42:58

while I do want to do that thing, I'll

43:00

do something else that I needed to do

43:01

because it's on the schedule.

43:02

It does not work. Procrastination is

43:04

because you don't want to do that thing

43:05

right now. You want to do something

43:06

else. Go do that something else. I

43:08

reject this frame that efficiency and

43:10

productivity and success are counter to

43:13

happiness and freedom. They actually go

43:15

together.

43:16

How so?

43:18

The happier you are, the more you can

43:19

sustain doing something, the more likely

43:21

you're going to do something that will

43:22

in turn make you even happier. and

43:24

you'll continue to do it and you'll

43:24

outwork everybody else. The more free

43:26

you are, the better you can allocate

43:28

your time and the less you're caught up

43:29

in a web of obligations and commitments

43:31

and the more you can focus on the task

43:33

at hand. In other news, this episode is

43:35

brought to you by Function. Staying on

43:37

top of your health requires more than

43:39

just an annual physical, which is why I

43:41

partnered with Function. They run lab

43:43

tests twice a year to track over a 100

43:45

biomarkers and monitor for early signs

43:47

of thousands of diseases. They even

43:49

screen for 50 types of cancer at stage

43:51

one, which is five times more data than

43:54

you get from an annual physical. You

43:55

receive insights from a team of expert

43:57

physicians who provide a detailed

43:58

written clinician summary of all their

44:00

observations and then phone

44:01

consultations for any critical findings.

44:03

Getting these lab tests done would

44:04

usually cost thousands, but with

44:06

function, it is only $499.

44:08

And right now, you can get the exact

44:10

same blood panels that I get and bypass

44:12

their weight list by going to the link

44:14

in the description below or heading to

44:15

functionhealth.com/modernwisdom.

44:18

That's functionhealth.com/modernwisdism.

44:22

This is related to another insight of

44:23

yours. The less you want something, the

44:25

less you're thinking about it, the less

44:26

you're obsessing over it, the more

44:28

you're going to do it in a natural way,

44:30

the more you're going to do it for

44:31

yourself, you're going to do it in a way

44:32

that you're good at and you're going to

44:34

stick with it. The people around you

44:35

will see the quality of your work is

44:37

higher. But this seems like a difficult

44:38

tension to navigate because an obsessive

44:43

attention to detail is a competitive

44:44

advantage of your work as well. So you

44:47

have these two things sort of

44:48

conflicting with each other. No one is

44:50

going to beat you at being you if it So

44:53

one of the things I like to say is like

44:55

find what feels like play to you but

44:58

looks like work to others. So it looks

45:01

like work to them but to you it feels

45:03

like play. It's not work. So you're

45:05

going to out compete them because you're

45:06

doing it effortlessly. You're doing it

45:08

for fun. They're doing it for work.

45:09

They're doing it for some byproduct. To

45:11

you it's art. It's beauty. It's joy.

45:13

It's it's flow. It's fulfilling. Uh, you

45:17

must enjoy podcasting. If you didn't,

45:19

you wouldn't be good at it. You would

45:22

either, right? If you would, you if if

45:24

you decided that the right way to get

45:26

ahead in life was to go write books, you

45:28

would nobody would have heard of you.

45:30

Chris Williamson's book would be a

45:31

complete flop. That's not who you are.

45:33

You're a podcaster. You enjoy talking to

45:35

people. You enjoy interviewing them. The

45:37

more you do things that are natural to

45:39

you, the less competition you have. You

45:41

escape competition through authenticity.

45:45

by being your own self. If I had to

45:47

summarize how to be successful in life

45:49

in two words, I would just say

45:51

productize yourself. That's it. Just

45:54

figure out what it is that you naturally

45:56

do that the world might want that you

45:59

can scale up and turn into a product and

46:02

it'll be it'll eventually be effortless

46:04

for you. Yes, there's always work

46:06

required, but it won't even feel like

46:07

work to you. It'll feel like play to

46:09

you. And modern society gives us that

46:12

opportunity. You know, if you were 2,000

46:14

years ago, you're born in a farm. Your

46:16

choices are very limited, right? You're

46:18

going to do stuff on that farm. Now, you

46:20

can literally wake up and you can move

46:22

to a different city. You can switch

46:24

careers. You can switch jobs. You can

46:26

change the people that you're with. Uh,

46:28

you know, you can change so many things

46:29

about who you are and who you're with

46:31

and what you're doing that there is

46:33

infinite opportunity out there for you.

46:35

Literally infinite. And so it's much

46:38

better to treat this like a search

46:39

function to find the people who need you

46:41

the most, to find the work that needs

46:42

you the most, to find the place you're

46:44

best suited to be at. And it's

46:46

worthwhile to spend time in that

46:48

exploration before diving into

46:49

exploitation. The biggest mistake in a

46:52

world with so many choices is premature

46:54

commitment. If you prematurely commit to

46:56

being a lawyer or a doctor and now

46:57

you've got like, you know, 5 years

46:59

invested into that, you might have just

47:01

completely missed. You might just end up

47:03

in the wrong profession, the wrong

47:05

place, or the wrong people for 30 years

47:06

of your life grinding away. And yes, the

47:08

best time to figure that out was before,

47:10

but the second best time is now. So,

47:12

just change it.

47:13

And also, presumably kill things that

47:16

aren't working very quickly.

47:19

By default, you should kill everything.

47:21

You know, if you can't decide, the

47:22

answer is no. Uh, and most things you

47:25

should just be saying no to. The part of

47:27

my keeping my calendar free is just by

47:29

default saying no to everything. Do I

47:31

want to create a calendar just to add

47:33

your event, right? Or to add your need

47:36

or your desire. One of the other things

47:38

about, you know, early on in life,

47:40

you're looking for opportunities. So,

47:41

you're saying yes to everything. And

47:43

that is a phase that you go through.

47:44

That is the exploration phase. Later,

47:46

when you found the thing you want to

47:48

work on, you're in the exploitation

47:49

phase. You have to say no to everything

47:51

by default. And if you don't say no to

47:53

everything by default, if you have to

47:55

even explicitly go out of your way to

47:56

say no to something, that will take up

47:58

time. Uh, for example, you know, there

48:00

there are a lot of people out there who

48:01

are into hustle culture and and a big

48:03

piece of hustle culture is like, well,

48:05

you're not going to get something if you

48:06

don't ask for it. So, they'll hustle

48:08

people. They'll always be sending you

48:09

requests, messages. Yeah, this is a

48:11

famous person problem, but I have it.

48:13

And people are always asking me for

48:14

things. And I kind of squirm when I get

48:16

these messages, and I'm sure you get

48:18

these two text messages, emails saying,

48:19

"Hey, Chris, my friend so and so should

48:22

really be on your podcast, or you should

48:23

come to my event. You should write a

48:24

forward for my book." And you kind of

48:26

squirm when you get this, right? You

48:27

have to figure out how to say no. And

48:29

one of the things I learned along the

48:30

way is that if you wouldn't ask somebody

48:33

else to do it and then you get that

48:35

request yourself, you can just dismiss

48:36

it. You don't have to respond. You don't

48:38

you don't even let let it enter your

48:40

brain. You have to be able to delete

48:41

emails and text messages without

48:42

flinching if you want to scale. And

48:44

scaling is very important. Scaling your

48:46

time is really important. Every

48:47

interruption will take you out of flow.

48:49

So the only way you can remain in flow

48:51

is if you get either very good at

48:53

ignoring these things by default or

48:55

closing yourself off like a hermit like

48:56

our mutual friend Tim Ferris does or you

49:00

just become emotionally capable of not

49:04

registering these as something that

49:06

causes turbulence inside of you.

49:08

That not registering it emotionally

49:10

thing is that uh

49:12

it's fundamental. That's so fundamental

49:14

to so many things in life.

49:15

Okay. Can we dig into that a little bit?

49:17

is because again I've only seen you as

49:19

you right I didn't know you 20 years ago

49:20

I didn't know you as a child um so I've

49:23

only seen you with this

49:26

holistic selfishness the in integrated

49:29

self- prioritization whatever we I don't

49:31

know what we called it

49:31

selfish is fine I'll take selfish I'm

49:33

selfish I'm very selfish person don't

49:35

contact me

49:38

uh yeah that emotional reaction I also

49:40

get the sense too that

49:42

maybe people have lived obligation life

49:46

for so long that they actually kind of

49:49

struggle to tap into what it is that

49:51

they want. They've hidden their wants

49:52

and their desires and their needs and

49:54

they've dep prioritized themselves so

49:55

much for so long they go, "What do I

49:58

want actually? What what is it? Do I

50:00

want to go to this thing or not?"

50:01

Because all I've done is be [ __ ]

50:03

puppeted, right? I've been marionetted

50:06

by other people's desires for so so so

50:08

long. I can't even tap into that

50:09

anymore. And saying no feels like a war

50:12

crime. So, so I think it's really good

50:14

to be able to view your own mind and

50:16

your own thoughts objectively and that

50:18

is the big benefit of meditation. It

50:20

creates a small gap between your

50:23

conscious observation self and your mind

50:26

and that lets you then look at your

50:28

thoughts and evaluate them a little bit

50:30

like you would a third party's

50:32

statements. And uh if you just take your

50:35

mind to be you and they're integrated in

50:37

one and the same at all times and you're

50:38

reacting from the mind, then you're not

50:40

even going to question things that come

50:42

into your mind. Anything that comes in

50:43

that creates a reaction will immediately

50:44

create a reaction. But if you can

50:47

observe your thoughts a little bit and

50:49

not in some woo way, but you can even

50:50

just do it through therapy, you can do

50:52

it through journaling, you can do it any

50:53

way you would like, you can just take

50:54

long walks, you don't have to meditate

50:55

and do lotus position. uh all that is

50:58

unnecessary. But if you can observe your

51:00

own thoughts and view them a little

51:02

objectively, then you can start being uh

51:05

a little more choosy, a little more

51:06

critical and you can realize that there

51:08

are no problems in the real world other

51:11

than maybe things that inflict pain on

51:13

your body. Everything else has to become

51:15

a problem in your mind first. You have

51:18

to view it and interpret it and create a

51:20

narrative that it is a problem before it

51:22

becomes a problem. And then you realize

51:24

that a lot of your emotional energy is

51:28

spent on reacting to things that your

51:30

mind is automatically saying are

51:32

problems. Uh and you don't need all

51:34

those problems. Do you really need that

51:36

many problems in your life? Again, I

51:38

would say try to focus on just one

51:40

overarching problem and then go solve

51:42

that problem. It's like if you want to

51:44

be successful, define success very

51:46

concretely. Focus on that. In everything

51:47

else, when it enters your mind, it

51:49

becomes a problem. Whether it's a

51:51

judgment about the girl walking down the

51:52

street or the car that just cut in front

51:54

of you or whether it's like you know

51:56

this your accountant did this stupid

51:58

thing like yes it's going to trigger you

52:00

but observe for a moment that like it's

52:02

triggering me. I've created a problem.

52:04

Do I really want to have this problem

52:05

right now? Do I want to spend the energy

52:06

on this problem or do I want that going

52:08

somewhere else? And it it doesn't have

52:10

to be that overt. You don't have to the

52:11

mind mud wrestling with itself is also a

52:13

problem but because it loves to do that.

52:15

I have my problems have got problems and

52:17

I have a real problem about fixing my

52:18

problems.

52:19

Yeah. Exactly. So you just you're going

52:22

to be much happier and much more

52:24

focused. Again, I think happiness and

52:26

focus and success can kind of complement

52:28

each other. You're going to have much

52:31

more energy. Just think about as mental

52:33

energy. You have much more mental energy

52:34

to focus on the actual problems you want

52:36

to solve if you don't start

52:38

unconsciously, subconsciously,

52:41

reactively picking up problems

52:42

everywhere. So before anything can be a

52:45

problem that takes up your emotional

52:46

energy, you have to accept it as a

52:48

problem. You can be choosy about your

52:50

problems. And I'm not saying I'm perfect

52:52

in that regard, but I think I'm better

52:54

than I used to be.

52:54

Well, lots of people are addicted to

52:56

solving problems. So much so that

52:58

sometimes people create problems when we

53:01

don't have any simply so that we can

53:03

solve them. We have that going on. And

53:05

then even worse is we take on problems

53:06

that we can't affect. So, uh, you know,

53:09

another one of my little quips was, uh,

53:12

you know, um, a rational person, uh,

53:15

can, uh, sort of a rational person

53:19

should should cultivate indifference to

53:21

things that are out of their control,

53:23

right? Uh, or a rational person can find

53:25

peace by cultivating indifference to

53:27

things that are out of their control.

53:28

Uh, and I'm as guilty as anybody of doom

53:31

surfing on X or social media and getting

53:34

worked up about things that I can't do

53:35

anything about, right? like, do I want

53:37

to be fighting those battles in my mind

53:39

when I literally cannot do anything

53:40

about it? So, if you find yourself

53:42

looping on a problem, like you're

53:44

watching the news too much and you're

53:45

getting caught up in a problem you can't

53:46

do anything about, um, you have to step

53:49

away from that. And, uh, modern media is

53:53

a delivery mechanism for mimetic

53:56

viruses. And now, what's happened now

53:59

is, you know, 100 years ago, 500 years

54:01

ago, if something wasn't happening in

54:03

your immediate vicinity, you wouldn't

54:05

hear about it. it wouldn't be a problem

54:06

for you. But now every single one of the

54:09

world's problems has turned into a

54:11

mimemetic virus which is going into the

54:13

battlefield of the news and is trying to

54:16

infect your mind in real time so that

54:18

yeah so that you become obsessed with

54:20

the war in Ukraine which is really far

54:22

away or you get obsessed with climate

54:24

change or you get obsessed with AI doom

54:26

or you get obsessed with whatever and

54:27

there's nothing as riveting as the old

54:29

religion the world is ending the world

54:31

is ending pay attention the world is

54:32

ending and if you don't

54:34

Cassandra complex at global scale

54:35

Cassandra complex at global scale Well,

54:37

and I would argue that large percentages

54:38

of the population are essentially just

54:40

infected with these mimetic viruses that

54:42

have taken over their brain and are

54:44

causing them to do incredible girration

54:45

about things that probably aren't even

54:47

true or are greatly exaggerated. But

54:50

even to the extent they are true,

54:51

they're things that that person can do

54:52

nothing about. And they should put their

54:54

own house in order first. So, you know,

54:57

another little line I have for myself is

54:59

your family is broken, but you're going

55:01

to fix the world. Right? People are

55:02

running out there to try and fix the

55:04

world when their own lives are a mess.

55:05

Oh my god.

55:06

Right? And and I think it defies

55:08

credibility if you can't fix your own

55:10

life first. I'm not going to take you

55:11

seriously if you can't fix your own

55:13

life. Like all these philosophers who,

55:15

you know, seem like people you emulate

55:17

and so smart or like these brilliant

55:19

celebrities and they go off and commit

55:20

suicide. Well, you just kind of

55:21

invalidated your whole way of life.

55:23

It's like that line of in No Country for

55:26

All Men where the killer is waiting for

55:27

the protagonist and protagonist shows up

55:29

and the killer says, "Well, you know, if

55:31

your set of rules brought you here, then

55:33

what good are your rules?" I didn't

55:36

work. Um I I I I am self I'm

55:39

holistically selfish in in that I want

55:41

to be objectively successful in

55:43

everything I set out to want.

55:46

Mhm. Yeah. Uh you have one life. Don't

55:48

settle for mediocrity.

55:49

Don't settle for mediocrity. And and I

55:51

think the only like people debate

55:52

intelligence for example, right? We talk

55:54

about IQ tests and all that, but I think

55:57

the only true test of intelligence is if

55:59

you get what you want out of life. And

56:01

there are two parts to that. One is

56:04

getting what you want so you know how to

56:06

get it. And the second is wanting the

56:07

right things. Knowing what to want in

56:09

the first place. I could want to be a,

56:11

you know, 6'8 basketball player and I'm

56:13

not going to get that. So it's wanting

56:15

the wrong thing. So

56:16

that's wanting something that you can't

56:17

get.

56:18

That's wanting something you can't get.

56:19

Is also wanting something that you don't

56:20

want.

56:21

Yeah. Wanting something that's a booby

56:23

prize. There are plenty of booby prizes

56:24

out there, too. Right.

56:25

I haven't heard that word in about 20

56:27

years.

56:27

Yeah. Prizes that are just not worth

56:28

having or that create their own

56:30

problems. Well, if you're not careful,

56:31

you can end up in a place in life not

56:33

only that you don't want to be, but one

56:34

that you didn't even mean to get to.

56:37

That's if you're kind of proceeding

56:38

unconsciously. Uh but and usually I

56:41

think people end up there because they

56:43

are uh going on autopilot with sort of

56:46

societal expectations or other people's

56:47

expectations. So, uh you know, or out of

56:50

guilt or out of like uh mimemetic

56:52

desire. You know, Peter Teal has this

56:53

whole thing from Rene Gerard about how

56:56

mimemetic desires are desires are picked

56:57

up from other people. Uh, and some of

56:59

those are automatically baked into

57:01

society like, you know, go to law

57:02

school, go to med school, go to

57:03

whatever, go to business school. Um, or

57:06

they might be from watching what your

57:07

friends are doing and, you know, the

57:09

other monkeys are doing. Um, or it might

57:11

just be, you know, what your parents

57:13

expectations are. I might be a guilt.

57:14

You know, guilt is just society's voice

57:16

speaking in your head, socially

57:17

programmed, so you'll be a good little

57:18

monkey and do things that are good for

57:20

the tribe.

57:21

Um, but I think the the the best

57:23

outcomes come when you think it through

57:25

for yourself and decide for yourself.

57:26

And I don't think people spend enough

57:28

time deciding. For example, we run on

57:30

these uh four-year cycles. You know, in

57:34

Silicon Valley, you go join a startup,

57:36

you vest your stock over four years.

57:38

That's the standard. Okay? Um uh in u uh

57:42

college, you know, you go for four

57:43

years. High school, you go for four

57:45

years. Um some things take longer. You

57:47

know, you have children, they hit

57:48

puberty 9 years later. That's like a

57:49

9-year cycle until that relationship

57:51

changes. Um but we're used to these

57:54

fairly long cycles, multi-year cycles in

57:57

which we are committed to things. You go

57:58

to law school, you know, four or five

58:00

year cycle. You go be a lawyer, 40-year

58:03

cycle. These are very long cycles. The

58:06

amount of time we spend deciding what to

58:09

do and who to do it with, very short,

58:11

very very short, right? We spend, you

58:14

know, 3 months deciding, one month

58:16

deciding on a job where we're going to

58:17

be for 10 years or 5 years. And because

58:20

a lot of discovery is path dependent

58:22

where the next thing you find on the

58:24

path is depend on where you were on the

58:25

previous path. You sort of start going

58:27

down this vector that is a very long

58:29

distance. People decide frivolously

58:31

which city to live in and that's going

58:33

to decide who their friends are, what

58:34

their jobs are, their opportunity, their

58:36

weather, their food supply, their air

58:37

supply, quality of life. You know, it's

58:39

such an important decision, but people

58:40

spend so little time thinking it

58:42

through. I would argue that if you're

58:43

making a four-year decision, spend a

58:45

year thinking it through. Like really

58:46

thinking it through.

58:47

25% of the time.

58:48

Yeah. Exactly. There's the secretary

58:50

theorem. I don't know if you know that

58:51

one.

58:52

Computer science.

58:52

After you've done this many people, pick

58:54

the best one of the next however many.

58:56

That's right.

58:56

Yeah. The secretary theorem is this

58:58

computer science professor is trying to

58:59

figure out uh how much time he should

59:01

spend interviewing secretaries and then

59:02

how long to keep the secretary. So let's

59:05

say he's going to have a secretary for

59:06

10 years. Does he keep searching for you

59:08

know one year, 2 years, 3 years, 1

59:10

month, 2 months? What is the optimal

59:12

time? Uh and it turns out that the

59:14

optimal time is somewhere around a

59:16

third. about a third of the way through,

59:18

you take the best person you've worked

59:20

with and try to find someone that good

59:22

or better. So that by the time you've

59:24

gotten about a third of the way through,

59:26

you have, excuse me, seen enough that

59:29

you now have a sense of what the bar is.

59:32

And then anybody who meets or exceeds

59:33

that bar is good enough.

59:35

And this applies to dating, this applies

59:37

to jobs and careers, this applies

59:38

generally. But the interesting thing

59:40

about the secretary theorem is that it's

59:42

actually not time based. It's not based

59:44

on onethird of the time. It's iteration

59:46

based.

59:47

The number of candidates,

59:48

the number of shots you took on goal.

59:50

That's right. So, you want to have lots

59:52

and lots of iterations. So, that means

59:53

that you need to bail out quickly and

59:54

you need to be decisive quickly.

59:56

That's right.

59:57

You need to you need to take

59:58

opportunities quickly and bail out

60:00

quickly.

60:00

Correct. Like if you go back and you

60:02

look through failed relationships, uh

60:04

probably the biggest regret will be

60:06

staying in the relationship after you

60:07

knew it was over.

60:08

Exactly. You should have left sooner.

60:09

The moment you knew it wasn't going to

60:10

work out, you should have moved on. So

60:12

in that sense, I think Malcolm Gladwell

60:13

popularized this idea of 10,000 hours to

60:16

mastery. I would say it's actually

60:17

10,000 iterations to mastery. It's not

60:19

actually 10,000. It's some unknown

60:21

number. But it's about the number of

60:22

iterations that drives a learning curve.

60:25

And iteration is not repetition.

60:27

Repetition is a different thing.

60:28

Repeating is doing the same thing over

60:29

and over. Iteration is modifying it with

60:32

a learning and then doing another

60:34

version of it. So that's error

60:36

correction. So if you get 10,000 error

60:38

corrections in anything, you will be an

60:39

expert at it. don't partner with cynics

60:42

and pessimists. You mentioned there

60:43

about uh the people who've got a

60:45

nightmare going on at home and are

60:46

trying to fix the world. But a lot of

60:48

the time that cynicism and pessimism we

60:51

find in ourselves. We see the world

60:53

whether we want to whether it's because

60:54

we've embied what the news or or the

60:57

negative people around us have said or

60:59

it's a bit more kind of endogenous than

61:01

that. It's just sort of in us. It's the

61:03

way that we see the world. How can

61:04

people

61:06

avoid cynicism and pessimism within

61:08

themselves?

61:09

Yeah. Synism and pessimism is a tough

61:11

one. It's we're naturally hardwired for

61:13

it. Again, I go back to evolution. I I'm

61:15

sorry to keep harping on evolution, but

61:16

within biology, there's very few good

61:18

explanatory theories. And you know,

61:20

theory of evolution by natural selection

61:21

is probably the best one. So, if you

61:24

can't explain something about life or

61:25

psychology or human nature through

61:27

evolution, then you probably don't have

61:28

a good theory for it. And I would say

61:31

that pessimism is another one that comes

61:33

out of this, which is in the natural

61:34

environment, you're hardwired to be

61:36

pessimistic. Because let's say that I

61:38

see something rustling in the woods and

61:40

if I move towards it and it turns out to

61:42

be food and prey then good I get to eat

61:44

one meal but if it turns out to be a

61:46

predator I get eaten and that's the end

61:47

of that. So we are hardwired to avoid

61:50

ruin um and and uh you know just dying.

61:54

So we are naturally hardwired to be

61:56

pessimists but modern society is very

61:58

different despite whatever problems you

62:00

may have with modern society. It is far

62:01

far safer than living in the jungle and

62:03

just trying to survive. uh and the

62:06

opportunities on the upside are

62:08

nonlinear. For example, when you're

62:10

investing, if you short a stock, you the

62:12

most money you can make is 2x. You just

62:14

lose, you know, if the stock goes to

62:15

zero, you double your money. But if the

62:17

stock is the next Nvidia and it goes

62:19

100x or a,000x, you make a lot of money.

62:22

So upside through because of leverage is

62:24

nearly unlimited.

62:26

Uh also in modern society, because

62:28

there's so many different people you can

62:30

interact with, if you go on a date and

62:32

it fails, there are infinite more people

62:33

to go on a date with. In a tribal

62:35

system, there might have been 20 people

62:36

and you can't even get through all of

62:38

them. So, modern society is far more

62:40

forgiving of failure. And you just have

62:42

to sort of neoccortically realize and

62:44

override that. You have to realize that

62:45

you're much more running a search

62:47

function to find the thing that'll work.

62:49

And then that one thing will pay off in

62:51

massive compounding. Once you find your

62:53

mate for the rest of your life, you find

62:55

your wife or your husband, then you can

62:57

compound in that relationship. It's okay

62:58

if you had 50 failed dates in between.

63:01

The same way once you find the one

63:02

business you're meant to plow into and

63:04

it'll compound returns. It's okay if you

63:06

had 50 small failed ventures or 50 small

63:08

failed job interviews. It doesn't the

63:10

number of failures doesn't matter. And

63:12

so there's no point in being a

63:13

pessimist. It's you want to be an

63:15

optimist. But I would say you want to be

63:18

you want to be skeptical about specific

63:20

things. Every specific opportunity is

63:23

probably a fail. But you want to be

63:24

optimistic in the general. In the

63:26

general you want to be like something in

63:28

here is going to work out.

63:28

How do you navigate that tension?

63:31

I mean, exactly as I said, I'm

63:32

optimistic in the general that if

63:34

something fails right now, then this is

63:36

a little woowoo, but it wasn't meant to

63:38

be. It was a learning experience. It was

63:39

an iteration. As long as I learned

63:41

something from it, then it's a win. If I

63:42

didn't learn from it, then it's a loss.

63:44

But as long as you're learning and you

63:46

keep iterating fast and cutting your

63:48

losses quickly, then when you find the

63:50

right thing, you have to be optimistic

63:52

and compound into it. So, you don't want

63:54

to jump into the first thing. And you

63:56

don't want to marry the first person you

63:57

date necessarily, unless you got very

63:59

lucky.

64:00

Um, but you you want to investigate and

64:03

explore very very quickly until you find

64:05

the match. And then you have to be

64:07

willing to go all in. You have to be

64:08

willing to move your chips to the center

64:09

of the table. So both those uh both

64:13

those uh approaches are required.

64:16

So it's a barbell strategy. It's sort of

64:18

black or it's white. And most people are

64:20

sort of stuck in this gray bit. And I'm

64:21

like half in, but I'm kind of don't

64:23

really know if I am. I also think like

64:24

labels like pessimist, optimist, cynic,

64:28

introvert, extrovert, these are very

64:31

self-limiting. Humans are very dynamic.

64:34

There are times when you feel like being

64:35

introverted. There are times when you

64:36

feel like being extroverted. There are

64:37

contexts in which you'll be pessimistic.

64:39

There are contexts in which you'll be

64:40

optimistic.

64:42

Leave all those labels alone. It's

64:44

better just to look at the problem at

64:46

hand. Look at reality the way it is. Try

64:49

to take yourself out of the equation in

64:51

a in a sense. Like obviously you're

64:53

involved, but motivated reasoning is the

64:56

worst kind of reasoning. Uh you're not

64:58

going to find truth through highly

64:59

motivated reasoning. You have to be

65:00

objective. And objective means trying to

65:02

take yourself out of it as much as

65:03

possible or at least your personality

65:05

out of it as much as possible.

65:06

And so to the extent you run with this

65:09

thick identity and personality, it's

65:11

going to cloud your judgment. It's going

65:12

to try and lock you into the past. If

65:15

you say, "I'm a depressed, unhappy

65:17

person. Yeah, I'm going to be unhappy."

65:18

That's a way of locking yourself into

65:20

your past. even saying, "I have trauma.

65:22

I have PTSD." Yeah, you you feel

65:24

something. There are memories. There are

65:25

flashes. There are occasional bad

65:27

feelings. But don't define yourself by

65:29

it because then you'll lock it into your

65:31

identity and you're just going to loop

65:32

on it. It's better to stay flexible

65:34

because reality is always changing and

65:36

you have to be able to adapt to it.

65:38

Adaptation is also intelligence.

65:39

Adaptation is survival. Adaptation is

65:42

kind of how you're here. You're here

65:43

because you're an adapter and your

65:44

ancestors were adapters. So to adapt,

65:47

you will be able to see things clearly.

65:49

And if you're seeing them through your

65:50

own identity, it's going to cloud your

65:52

judgment. A quick aside, you've probably

65:54

heard me talk about element before. In

65:56

fact, you might be thinking, "For sake,

65:59

Chris, will you shut up about element?"

66:01

And the answer is no, I won't because

66:04

when I take it, I genuinely feel the

66:06

difference. I genuinely believe that

66:07

proper hydration makes a massive

66:08

difference to your performance. So, I'm

66:10

going to keep talking about it until you

66:12

start drinking it. Element is a tasty

66:14

electrolyte drink mix with everything

66:16

that you need and nothing that you

66:17

don't. Each grab-and-go stick pack

66:18

contains a sciencebacked electrolyte

66:20

ratio of sodium, potassium, and

66:22

magnesium with no sugar, no coloring, no

66:24

artificial ingredients, or any other

66:26

junk. It plays a critical role in

66:28

reducing muscle cramps and fatigue while

66:29

optimizing brain health, regulating

66:31

appetite, and curbing cravings. This

66:33

orange flavor in a cold glass of water

66:35

is how I've started my morning every

66:37

single day for over 3 years now, and I

66:39

genuinely feel the difference versus

66:41

when I don't. Best of all, they have a

66:43

no questions asked refund policy with an

66:45

unlimited duration. So, you can buy it

66:47

and try it for as long as you want. And

66:48

if you don't like it for any reason,

66:50

they'll just give you your money back.

66:51

You don't even need to return the box.

66:53

That's how confident they are that you

66:54

love it. Plus, they offer free shipping

66:56

within the US. And right now, you can

66:58

get a free sample pack of all eight

66:59

flavors with your first box by going to

67:01

the link in the description below or

67:02

heading to drinklnt.com/modernwisdom.

67:06

That's drinklnt.com/modern

67:11

wisdom.

67:15

[Laughter]

67:20

Moving on to sort of thinking about

67:22

happiness. Obviously a topic of yours

67:24

that's a

67:26

it's honestly the one that I feel least

67:27

qualified to talk about.

67:29

Is it like a guy that's got long arms

67:30

teaching you how to bench press or a

67:32

dude that's really tall teaching you how

67:33

to deadlift? someone that feels like

67:34

they came from behind the eightball.

67:36

Yeah. Is you're you're asking a crazy

67:38

person about their thoughts. So, just

67:41

thought it through. Is happiness still

67:43

more about peace than it is about joy?

67:46

It's just one of those overloaded words

67:48

that means different things to different

67:49

people. So, I'm not even sure we're

67:51

communicating the same language. But, uh

67:56

what is happiness?

68:00

I think it's just basically being okay

68:02

with where you are.

68:06

Not wanting

68:08

not wanting things to be different than

68:10

the way they are. Not having the sense

68:11

that anything is missing in this moment.

68:15

Needing something to change. Your

68:18

current positive situation being

68:20

contingent on an adjustment

68:22

on getting something from the outside

68:24

world.

68:28

Ironically,

68:30

I think most people if you were to ask

68:31

them when they were happiest for a

68:34

sustained period of time, not for a

68:35

brief moment, because pleasure can

68:37

override happiness and create kind of

68:38

this illusion of happiness.

68:40

But if you ask people when they were

68:41

happy for a sustained period of time,

68:43

they were probably doing some variation

68:45

of nothing.

68:49

That's interesting because in the chase

68:51

is this sort of lack, this contingency.

68:54

That's right. But then you get bored. If

68:57

you just sit around all the time, you

68:58

get bored. So you want adventure, you

68:59

want surprise. Like there's a funny

69:02

thought experiment of the bliss machine,

69:04

right? Which is suppose I could drill a

69:06

hole in your head and put electrode in.

69:08

And they did this with monkeys and I can

69:11

put a wire in there and I can stimulate

69:13

just the right part of your brain and I

69:14

can put you in bliss and you'll just be

69:16

in bliss. Would you would you want that?

69:19

Would that be nice?

69:20

For how long?

69:22

Do it and I'll tell you.

69:23

Right. So most people will say, "Well, I

69:25

don't want that. I want meaning. I don't

69:27

want just bliss. I want meaning." And

69:29

you're like, "Okay, well, I'll put an

69:30

electrode in there and I'll give you

69:32

meaning. How about that?" And if you

69:35

kind of run this thought experiment long

69:36

enough, I think most people realize

69:38

actually what I want is I want surprise.

69:40

I want and

69:41

I want the world to surprise me and I

69:43

want to wrestle with it in ways that are

69:45

somewhat predictable but somewhat not.

69:47

And you kind of end up back where you

69:48

started.

69:49

So I I don't know if necessarily

69:52

for some people Pure happiness is the

69:54

ultimate goal. They want to, you know,

69:56

just be blissfully happy wherever they

69:58

are, whenever they are. But I think

70:01

other people, most people would say,

70:03

well, I'm here in this world. I'm here

70:05

in this life. I don't understand it or

70:07

why, but I want to be I want to be

70:10

engaged. I want to be surprised. I want

70:12

to do things. I want to accomplish

70:14

things. I want to want things and then

70:16

get them. Right? That's kind of the

70:17

whole game that we're all playing here.

70:19

Surprises are really interesting. the

70:21

sort of unpredictability. I think total

70:24

bro science here, but I'm pretty sure

70:25

that that's kind of how dopamine works.

70:27

That things are a bit better than you

70:28

expected. That within that it means that

70:32

if you for the perennial insecure

70:35

overachievers that uh cloy for control

70:38

that really want to be able to the

70:40

schedule is perfectly done and we know

70:41

the itinerary, we know where we're going

70:42

to be at this time. you're in some ways

70:45

I guess reducing down the capacity for

70:48

surprise because everything has become

70:51

uh very contrived prescribed done in

70:53

advance laid out your ability to be

70:56

surprised actually diminishes. Yeah. If

70:58

if nothing worked out the way you

71:00

expected, if it was all serendipity and

71:03

you didn't want that, you would just be

71:05

a ball of anxiety. On the other hand, if

71:07

everything worked out as you expected

71:09

and wanted, you'd be so bored you might

71:11

as well be dead. So there's some, you

71:14

know, the the river of life kind of

71:16

flows between these two banks and enjoy

71:20

it.

71:21

You say thinking about yourself is the

71:22

source of all unhappiness, but

71:24

presumably you need to work on yourself

71:26

and your weaknesses as well. So some

71:29

degree of reflection is important. And

71:32

if thinking about yourself is a source

71:34

of unhappiness, is this a price that you

71:35

need to pay? I need to sort of reflect

71:36

inward. I'm going to have to diminish

71:38

this level of happiness for a little

71:39

while and then I can use this new level.

71:42

I've got my brown belt on and I can go

71:44

out into the world as a brown belt.

71:45

What I'm specifically referring to that

71:47

is if if you're thinking about your

71:50

personality and your ego and the

71:51

character of you and uh you're obsessing

71:54

over that. That's where a lot of

71:56

depression and unhappiness sort of

71:57

lingers and and gets cultivated.

72:00

Uh so uh thinking about woe is me, this

72:05

happened to me. that happened to me. I

72:07

have this personality. I have this

72:08

issue. I deserve this. I didn't get

72:10

that. That's you're just strengthening a

72:14

little beast in there that is

72:15

insatiable. And that's where I think a

72:18

lot of unhappiness comes from.

72:19

What's the beast?

72:20

It's the ego. But that word is so

72:22

overused that I kind of hate to use the

72:24

word. Um, but it's like a it's a

72:26

recurrent collection of thoughts that

72:28

are very self-obsessed and will never be

72:30

satisfied.

72:31

Very concretized as well. So, they're

72:33

not malleable, not particularly

72:34

flexible. So you're just adding to them

72:35

by thinking about them all the time.

72:36

You're creating narratives and stories

72:38

and identities. Um but that's different

72:41

from solving personal problems. So if

72:43

you encounter something, you learn from

72:45

something, you're reflecting upon the

72:47

learning, then you can reflect upon it,

72:49

absorb it, and then just move on. But

72:51

sitting there saying, "I'm Chris. I'm

72:52

Nal. I deserve this. This happened to

72:54

me. That person wronged me. This is who

72:56

I am. This shouldn't have happened. I

72:58

need to go get revenge on this or I need

73:00

to fix that or change this." I mean that

73:02

I think is where a lot of mental illness

73:05

is, you know, comes from.

73:07

So it depends if you are thinking about

73:10

something to solve a problem and get it

73:12

off your chest and get it off your mind.

73:14

If it leaves your mind clearer at the

73:16

end of it, then I think it was

73:19

worthwhile. If it leaves your mind

73:20

busier at the end of it, then you're

73:22

probably going the wrong direction.

73:23

Is this a a justification for

73:28

detachment? uh cultivated ignorance uh

73:32

distraction.

73:32

Detachment is not a goal. Detachment is

73:34

a byproduct. It's it's just a byproduct

73:36

of just realizing you know what matters

73:38

and what doesn't. Uh and and just for

73:41

one moment on the self thing, I think

73:45

everybody craves thinking about

73:47

something more than themselves. If you

73:49

want to be, you know, happy to some

73:51

extent, you have to forget about your

73:52

personal problems. And one way to do

73:54

that is take on other problems, bigger

73:56

problems. Uh and that could be a

73:58

mission, that could be s that could be

74:00

spirituality, that could be kids, um it

74:03

could be caring about the planet,

74:04

although I think people take that a

74:05

little far, you know, and then they get

74:07

kind of oppressive and and tyrannical in

74:10

support of abstract concepts. But so

74:12

these can be taken too far. Just like

74:13

religion for example, just like

74:15

anything in excess,

74:16

anything in excess, right? Um but

74:18

generally the less you think about

74:20

yourself, the more you can think about a

74:22

mission or about God or about a child or

74:25

something like that. I remember Vinnie

74:27

Himmath uh the founder of Loom said uh I

74:31

am rich and I have no idea to do what to

74:32

do with my life and you replied God kids

74:34

on mission pick at least one that's

74:36

right preferably all three.

74:40

It's very liberating.

74:42

Um yeah thinking I think overthinking

74:45

about yourself is probably the it's it

74:48

may not be the cause of depression but

74:50

it certainly doesn't help rumination.

74:53

Yeah. I

74:55

I kind of had a self-induced Stockholm

74:58

syndrome from this sort of a thing

75:00

because I like to think about stuff and

75:02

you provide you with an endless number

75:05

of things to think about. So, you're

75:07

kind of Yeah, you have this um you're

75:09

the prisoner and the prison guard at the

75:10

same time. And I had Abigail Shrier on

75:14

the show. She was wrote this book called

75:16

Bad Therapy, sort of pushing back

75:18

against therapy culture for kids,

75:19

specifically for kids. there was a blast

75:21

radius that covered pretty much

75:22

everything, including kind of CBT, I'm

75:25

like, f like we're getting perilously

75:26

close to some really evidence-based

75:27

stuff here. But

75:30

the more that I've thought about it and

75:31

the more that I've looked at the

75:32

evidence, there is like basically a

75:34

direct correlation between how much you

75:36

think about yourself and how miserable

75:37

you are. Therapy is great if it lets you

75:40

vent and it solves a thing and then x

75:42

session later you're done. You're clear.

75:45

But if you're just looping on the same

75:46

thing forever, then it's actually the

75:48

opposite.

75:48

You're bathing in it. You're indulging

75:49

in it. Yeah. Yeah.

75:52

How have your become happy techniques

75:55

developed over time?

75:58

Yeah, I used to have a lot of them. Uh,

76:01

now I kind of try not to have any

76:04

because I think the techniques

76:06

themselves are kind of a struggle. It's

76:08

sort of like bidding for status implies

76:11

you're low status. It reveals that

76:12

you're low status. So, someone who's

76:14

basically trying to show off uh comes

76:16

across as low status. The same way

76:18

someone who's trying to be happy is sort

76:20

of saying I'm unhappy and creating that

76:22

frame. So it's better just to not even

76:24

think in terms of

76:25

you position yourself as being in lack

76:27

in order to attain.

76:28

Yeah. I don't even think in terms of

76:30

happiness unhappiness anymore. I just

76:32

kind of just do my thing.

76:33

Again, another question that's similar

76:35

to a bunch of them. Do you think you

76:37

could have got there had you have not

76:38

done the procedural systematic sort of

76:42

step by step by step this is what it is

76:43

and then come out the other side?

76:45

I don't think there are any formulas. I

76:46

think it's unique to each person. It's

76:47

like asking a successful person, how did

76:49

you become successful? Each one of them

76:51

will give you a different story. Uh you

76:53

can't follow anyone else's path. And

76:54

most of them are even probably telling

76:56

you some narratized version of it that

76:58

isn't quite true.

76:59

I mean, that's something that I

77:01

continually realize, especially as I get

77:03

to spend more time around people that

77:04

are successful and you hear um it's very

77:08

important to prioritize work life

77:09

balance, right? That's one of the most

77:10

common things that people who have

77:12

attained success say

77:13

that's not my experience. But if you

77:15

look at, you shouldn't be asking

77:17

somebody who is successful what they do

77:20

to continue their success now. You

77:21

should be asking them what did they do

77:23

to attain their success when they are

77:25

where you were.

77:26

And the people who are really

77:28

extraordinarily successful didn't sit

77:31

around watching success porn.

77:34

They just went and did it. They just had

77:35

they had such an overwhelming desire to

77:37

be successful at the thing that they

77:40

were doing that they just went and did

77:41

that thing. They didn't have time to

77:43

study and learn and listen and they just

77:46

did it. It's the overwhelming desire

77:48

that's the most important and the focus

77:50

that comes from that.

77:52

That tweet of yours that was uh people

77:55

who are good at making wealth or people

77:56

are good at attaining wealth don't need

77:57

to teach anybody else how to do it.

77:59

Yeah. You don't need mentors, you need

78:00

action. That was one of them. Another

78:02

one is you know the uh the people who

78:05

actually know how to make money don't

78:07

need to sell you a course on it. There

78:08

it is.

78:09

Um, yeah, there's lots of variations on

78:10

it. But I if you don't, another one is

78:14

if you don't lie awake at night thinking

78:15

about it, you don't want it badly

78:16

enough.

78:18

Yeah, I think you I've heard you talk

78:21

before about how um sort of unclosed

78:24

loops problems that you're working on

78:26

can cause you to be sleepless. And uh

78:28

this

78:29

I'm not a good sleeper.

78:30

Tell me about that.

78:31

Oh, I mean my eight sleep hates me. It's

78:33

always telling me I failed at sleeping

78:35

again. And Brian Johnson thinks I'm

78:37

going to die early. He's probably right.

78:39

But I

78:40

How much do you reckon you sleep a

78:41

night? You got any idea?

78:42

Oh, it's so random. Some nights I'll

78:43

sleep 8 hours. Some nights I'll sleep 4

78:45

hours. But it's literally just random.

78:48

Are you bothered about that? You trying

78:50

to optimize? You go a sleep coach

78:51

teaching you how to

78:52

I don't fogg myself over things. Uh if I

78:55

want to sleep, I'll sleep. If I don't

78:57

want to sleep, I don't sleep. It's not a

78:59

I don't think I'm doing anything right

79:00

or wrong.

79:01

You don't label it good night, bad

79:02

night.

79:04

No, I work out every day because I think

79:06

it gives me more energy and I've gotten

79:08

into a good habit with it. Maybe I'll do

79:10

the same thing with sleep. Maybe I'll

79:11

develop a good habit, but I'm not going

79:12

to beat myself up over it. There'll come

79:14

a point where it's important to me and

79:15

when it's important to me, I'll just do

79:17

it. You know, most of like, for example,

79:19

you look at people with addictions,

79:20

right? Overeating or smoking or

79:22

whatever, they can

79:24

kind of go through all the different

79:25

methods, but it's half-hearted. And then

79:27

one day they're like, "Oh [ __ ] I've got

79:29

lung cancer. My dad has lung cancer."

79:30

and they drop it immediately.

79:33

So I think a lot a lot of change is more

79:35

about desire and understanding than it

79:39

is about uh forcing yourself or trying

79:41

to domesticate yourself.

79:42

It's efficiency again I guess you know

79:44

aligning the thing that you want to do

79:46

with the way that you feel about what it

79:47

is that you want to do.

79:49

Yeah. It's not it's not getting caught

79:51

up in a in a half desire or a mimetic

79:54

desire. It's really just

79:58

being aware of what it is that you

80:00

actually want at this point in time. And

80:02

when you want something, then you will

80:04

act on it with maximal capability.

80:07

And that's the time to act on it. In the

80:09

meantime, just doing it because other

80:11

people tell you you should do it or

80:12

society tells you you should do it or

80:14

you feel slightly guilty about it. These

80:16

are these are half-hearted efforts and

80:17

half-hearted efforts don't get you

80:19

there. As you get older, one thing that

80:21

becomes harder to ignore is your

80:22

testosterone levels. They impact

80:24

everything from

80:27

your energy to your mood and how well

80:29

you recover. However, there are

80:30

sciencebacked supplements like Tonat

80:32

that support testosterone strength and

80:34

recovery. And that is why I'm such a

80:36

huge fan of Momentus' product because

80:38

they make the only NSFcertified Tonat

80:41

Ali on the planet. That means it's so

80:43

rigorously tested that even Olympic

80:44

athletes can use it and why I partnered

80:46

with them because they make the most

80:48

carefully tested, highest quality

80:49

supplements on Earth. This is a huge

80:52

part of my brain, body, and sleep stack,

80:54

which makes a big impact on my

80:55

cognition, my strength, and my recovery.

80:58

And if you're still unsure, Momentous

80:59

offers a 30-day money back guarantee.

81:01

So, you can buy it and try it for 29

81:03

days. If you don't love it, they'll give

81:04

you your money back. Plus, they ship

81:06

internationally. Right now, you can get

81:07

35% off your subscription and that

81:09

30-day money back guarantee by going to

81:11

the link in the description below or

81:13

heading to livemus.com/modernwisdomd

81:15

and using the code modernwisdom at

81:17

checkout. That's l i v m o m e n t

81:19

o.com/modernwisdom

81:22

and modern wisdom a checkout. You

81:24

mentioned anxiety before. Uh imagine how

81:27

effective you'd be if you weren't

81:28

anxious all the time is is one of yours

81:30

and anxiety is the emotion dour of the

81:34

21st century and lots of driven people

81:37

very anxious very paranoid that's what's

81:39

caused them to be affected. They pay so

81:41

much attention detail oriented not

81:42

letting things go staying up at night

81:44

thinking about it. That's the paranoia

81:45

coming in. What have you come to learn

81:48

about anxiety and dealing with it?

81:50

So, anxiety and stress are interesting.

81:52

They're very related. Stress is when uh

81:54

like if you look at an iron beam, when

81:56

an iron beam is under stress, it's cuz

81:58

it's being bent in two different

81:59

directions at the same time. So, when

82:01

your mind is under stress, it's because

82:03

it has two conflicting desires at once.

82:06

So, for example, you know, you you want

82:08

to be liked, but you want to do

82:10

something selfish, and you can't

82:11

reconcile the two, and so you're under

82:13

stress. uh you want to do something for

82:15

somebody else, you want to do something

82:16

for yourself, right? These aream you you

82:19

don't want to go to work but you want to

82:20

make money so you're under stress right

82:22

so you have two conflicting desires and

82:25

I think one of the ways to get through

82:26

stress is to acknowledge that oh I

82:29

actually have two conflicting desires

82:31

and either I need to resolve it I need

82:33

to pick one and then be okay losing the

82:35

other or I will decide later but at

82:38

least just being aware of why you're

82:40

stress can help alleviate a lot of

82:41

stress and then anxiety I think is sort

82:44

of this pervasive unidentifiable able

82:47

stress where you're just kind of

82:48

stressed out all the time and you're not

82:50

even sure why and you can't even

82:52

identify the underlying problem. I think

82:54

the reason for that is because you you

82:55

have so many uh unresolved problems,

82:58

unresolved stress points that have piled

83:00

up in your life that you can no longer

83:02

identify what the problems are and

83:04

there's this mountain of garbage in your

83:07

mind and it's a little bit of it poking

83:08

out the top like an iceberg and that's

83:11

anxiety. But underneath there's a lot of

83:13

unresolved things. And so you just need

83:15

to kind of go through very carefully

83:17

every time you're anxious. Like, okay,

83:19

why am I anxious this time? I don't know

83:21

why. Oh, well, let me sit here and just

83:23

think about it. Let me let me write down

83:24

what the possible causes could be. Let

83:26

me meditate on it. Let me journal. Let

83:28

me talk to a therapist. Let me talk to

83:29

my friends. Let me just kind of see like

83:31

when does that stress go away? If you

83:33

can kind of identify and unravel and

83:36

resolve these issues, then I think that

83:38

helps get rid of anxiety. uh a lot of

83:41

the anxiety is piled up because we move

83:42

through life too quickly, not observing

83:44

our own reactions to things. We don't

83:46

resolve them. So, this goes counter to

83:48

what I was saying earlier about not

83:49

reflecting too much on things, but you

83:51

reflect on the problems to observe them

83:53

and solve them. You don't reflect on

83:54

them to feel better about yourself,

83:56

to indulge them.

83:56

Well, if if if you're doing it to just

83:58

feel better about yourself, that could

84:01

be strengthening your personality and

84:02

your ego and could be creating a more

84:04

fragile personality. Um, you know, one

84:07

one big anxiety resolver for me is just

84:10

ruminating on death. I think that's a

84:12

good one. You're going to die. It's all

84:14

going to zero. You cannot take anything

84:15

with you. And I know this is trit. And I

84:17

know the the we don't spend enough time

84:19

thinking about the big questions. We

84:21

kind of give up on them when we're very,

84:23

very young. You know, a little child

84:24

might ask the big questions like, why

84:26

are we here? What's the meaning of life?

84:28

What is this all about? You know, is

84:29

there Santa Claus? Is there God? But

84:31

then as adults, we're taught not to

84:32

think about these things or we've given

84:34

up on them. But I think the big

84:36

questions are the big questions for good

84:37

reasons. And uh if you can keep the idea

84:41

in front of you at all times that you're

84:43

going to die and that everything goes

84:46

literally to zero.

84:49

What's there to stress about?

84:50

Yeah. For better or worse, life is very

84:52

short. How should people deal with its

84:55

briefness?

84:57

Enjoy it.

84:59

Make the best of it. You know, it's it's

85:01

even briefer than that. Each moment just

85:03

disappears. it's gone. There's only a

85:05

present moment and it's gone instantly.

85:07

So if you're not if you're not there for

85:09

it, if you're stressed out or you're

85:11

anxious or you're thinking about

85:12

something else, you missed it. So you're

85:15

any moment when you're not in that

85:17

moment, you are dead to that moment.

85:19

You might as well be dead because your

85:21

mind is off doing something else or you

85:23

know living in some imagined reality

85:26

that is just a very poor substitute for

85:28

the actual reality. So one of my recent

85:31

realizations was what is wasted time?

85:35

What is a what is a waste of time? So I

85:37

don't like to waste time but what is

85:38

wasted time? And everything is wasted

85:42

time in a sense because nothing matters

85:44

in the ultimate.

85:45

Uh but in each moment the thing matters.

85:49

In each moment it's the only thing that

85:51

matters. Actually the what's happening

85:52

in front of you is literally has all the

85:54

meaning in the world. And so what

85:57

matters is just being present for the

85:59

thing. So if you're doing something that

86:01

you want to do and you're fully there

86:03

for it, then it's not wasted time. If

86:05

you don't want to do it and your mind is

86:07

running away from it and you're reacting

86:09

against it and you're wishing you were

86:11

somewhere else and you're thinking about

86:12

some other thing or you're anticipating

86:14

some future thing or regretting some

86:16

past thing or being fearful of

86:17

something, then that's wasted time.

86:20

That's time that's being wasted when

86:21

you're not actually present for the

86:22

reality in front of you. So my

86:24

definition of wasted time, yes I do want

86:26

some material things in life and I you

86:28

know there there are things that have

86:30

more value than others within this life

86:31

but this life is very short and bounded.

86:34

So the true wasted time is a time that

86:36

you're not present for when you are not

86:38

there for it. When you're not doing the

86:41

thing you want to do to the best of your

86:43

capability such that you're immersed in

86:44

it. If you're not immersed in this

86:46

moment then you're wasting your time.

86:48

People get worried about dying and no

86:50

longer being here, but they don't

86:51

realize that so much of their life is

86:52

spent not being here in any case.

86:54

That's right. But and I think people

86:57

crave being here for it. And and and

87:00

when you're here for it, you're actually

87:02

not thinking about yourself. You are

87:04

more immersed in the thing, the the

87:06

moment, the task at hand.

87:07

We don't want peace of mind. We want

87:08

peace for our mind.

87:09

That's right. Yeah. You don't peace. The

87:11

mind is what can eat you alive if you

87:13

let it. And there's more to you than the

87:15

mind.

87:16

How so?

87:19

Well, I mean the very

87:22

I don't want to disassemble the body, so

87:24

to speak, right? Because please go on.

87:26

Yeah. At the end of the day, like

87:28

everything arises within your

87:29

consciousness, right? You you

87:31

got nowhere else to experience it.

87:32

Sorry.

87:33

You've got nowhere else to experience.

87:34

Nowhere else to experience it. And that

87:35

consciousness is uh relatively static in

87:38

the sense that it's been exactly the

87:39

same from the moment you were born to

87:40

the moment you die. And everything that

87:42

you experience from your body from your

87:44

mind to the world to to everything is

87:46

within that consciousness. Uh and that

87:49

thing that base layer of being and this

87:51

is what the Buddhists will tell you is

87:53

the real thing. Everything that comes

87:55

and goes in the middle including your

87:57

mind including your body is unreal. And

87:59

trying to find stability in those

88:02

transient things is is your castle that

88:04

you're building on sand that's going to

88:06

crumble.

88:07

Life is going to play out the way it's

88:08

going to play out. There will be some

88:10

good and some bad. Most of it is

88:12

actually just up to your interpretation.

88:14

You're born, you have a set of sensory

88:15

experiences, and then you die. How you

88:18

choose to interpret those experiences is

88:19

up to you. And different people

88:21

interpret them in different ways. Yeah.

88:23

The old line about two people walking

88:24

down the street. They're having the

88:25

exact same experience. One is h

88:27

experience. One is happy, one is sad,

88:29

right? It's a narrative in their heads.

88:30

It's how they choose to interpret. Um,

88:32

so I think when I said that, it was a

88:35

long time ago. I was talking more about

88:36

having positive interpretations and

88:38

negative interpretations. But these

88:39

days, I think it's better just not to

88:40

have any interpretations and to just

88:43

allow things to be.

88:45

You're still going to have

88:46

interpretations.

88:48

You can't stop it. Uh and nor should you

88:50

try. But even that having an

88:52

interpretation is just a thing you can

88:53

leave alone.

88:55

Yeah. I really want to try and just dig

88:57

in a little more to the best way to

89:00

remind people that they should value

89:01

their time. just how brief it is that

89:05

the time that you spend ruminating,

89:07

being distracted, fears of the past,

89:09

regrets.

89:11

Well,

89:16

I don't want to tell anybody how to live

89:18

their life. I would just say that to the

89:19

extent that you want to improve your

89:21

quality of life, the uh the easiest and

89:25

best way to do that is to observe your

89:28

own mind and your own thoughts and and

89:30

be a little not not necessarily critical

89:32

but um be observant of yourself more

89:35

objectively and then you'll kind of

89:37

realize your own loops and patterns. It

89:39

takes time. It's not it's not overnight.

89:41

It's not instantaneous.

89:42

So you mean letting go is not a one-time

89:43

event.

89:44

Yeah. And and there's letting go is not

89:47

necessarily even the right answer. Like

89:48

yes, if you're trying to be an

89:50

enlightened being and you know you want

89:51

to live like a god and everything's

89:52

going to be perfect and be a Buddha,

89:54

sure you can let go. But uh I think in

89:56

practice it's actually quite hard to do.

89:57

Um,

89:59

I think I would say that it's uh you're

90:02

going to find a lot of fulfillment out

90:04

of life by just doing what you want to

90:06

do and genuinely exploring what it is

90:09

that you want rather than doing what

90:11

other people expect you to do or society

90:13

expects you to do or what you might just

90:14

think should be done by default. Um, you

90:18

know, I think most older successful

90:21

people will tell you that their life was

90:23

best when they lived it unapologetically

90:25

on their own terms.

90:28

Be selfish.

90:28

Holistic selfishness. We can clip that

90:31

little selfish. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Keep

90:34

running back.

90:35

Bad guy. Great.

90:36

I I had this insight or a question, I

90:38

guess. How much do you think that we

90:40

should trust the voice in our heads?

90:42

Because half of wisdom suggests to rely

90:45

on your sort of bottomup intuition and

90:47

then half of it has to be sort of top

90:50

down rational as possible. How do you

90:52

navigate the tension between head and

90:54

gut in this way?

90:56

I think the gut is what decides. Um the

91:00

head is kind of what rationalizes it

91:01

afterwards. The gut is the ultimate

91:03

decision maker. If it doesn't and and

91:05

what is the gut? The gut is refined

91:07

judgment. It's taste aggregate

91:09

aggregated and it could be aggregated

91:11

through evolution uh and it's in your

91:13

genes and your DNA or it could be

91:15

aggregated through your experiences and

91:17

what you've thought through. The mind is

91:19

good at solving new problems and uh new

91:22

problems in the external world that have

91:24

defi defined edges you know beginnings

91:27

and ends and and objectives.

91:30

What the mind is actually really bad at

91:32

is making hard decisions. So when you

91:34

have a hard decision to make I find it's

91:36

better to yes you ruminate on it. You

91:38

think through all the pros and cons but

91:39

then you sleep on it. You wait a couple

91:41

of days. You wait until the gut answer

91:43

appears with conviction and it feels

91:45

right. And when you're younger, it takes

91:47

longer because you just don't have as

91:49

much experience. And when you're older,

91:51

uh, it can happen much faster, which is

91:53

why, you know,

91:54

and you have less time to

91:55

Yeah. And old people just more set in

91:56

their ways as a consequence, right? They

91:58

know what they want. They know what they

91:59

don't want. Um, so it takes time to

92:02

develop your gut instinct and judgment.

92:04

But once you've developed them, don't

92:06

trust anything else because you can't go

92:08

against your gut. It'll bite you in the

92:09

end. Uh usually in relationships that

92:12

failed, you can look back and say, "Oh,

92:13

actually, I knew it was going to fail

92:15

because of this reason, but I kind of

92:16

went ahead anyway because I wanted it to

92:18

be this way, right? I wanted this person

92:20

to be a different way than they are, or

92:22

I wanted to get a different thing out of

92:23

it than I thought I was going to than I

92:24

knew I was going to get, but I just

92:26

wanted it." So sometimes desire will

92:29

override your judgment and then trap.

92:31

Yeah. Wishful thinking. It traps you

92:33

into a into a pathway that chews up

92:35

time.

92:36

What's that uh inside of yours? U we

92:39

think we can't change ourselves but we

92:41

can. We think we can change other people

92:42

but we can't.

92:43

Exactly. Uh I think to add to that you

92:45

can't change other people. You can

92:46

change your reaction to them. You can

92:48

change yourself but other people only

92:51

change through trauma or their own

92:53

insight on their own schedule and never

92:55

in a way that you like.

92:56

Yeah. Alanderon says that uh people do

92:59

sometimes change but rarely in

93:01

relationships and never when they're

93:02

told to.

93:03

Absolutely. Yeah. The fastest way to

93:05

kind of alienate somebody is to tell

93:06

them to change. In fact, uh the Dale

93:08

Carnegie School of Public Speaking, you

93:10

know, the way that operates is, uh they

93:13

get you up there and they realize that

93:14

the number one problem with public

93:16

speaking is uh that uh people are very

93:19

self-conscious and so uh people who are

93:23

practicing in the Dale Carnegie School

93:24

of Public Speaking, I don't know, I

93:25

never went through I heard this

93:26

secondhand so I could be wrong but I

93:28

like the story where they get up and

93:31

they start speaking and the people in

93:32

the audience are only allowed to

93:33

compliment them genuine compliments not

93:35

fake compliments on things that they did

93:37

well but you're not allowed to criticize

93:38

them on things that they did poorly and

93:40

eventually they kind of get through it

93:42

and they develop the self-confidence

93:44

the same way uh there's like the

93:46

Michelle Thomas school of language

93:48

learning and on that one what they do is

93:50

you listen to a teacher talking to a

93:52

student they're not teaching you you're

93:53

not expected to remember or memorize

93:55

anything you just listen to a student

93:57

stumbling over the language. It's a

93:58

better way to learn because you yourself

94:00

don't feel flustered. You're being

94:02

tested, graded.

94:02

Oh, so you're not in your own head as

94:04

much.

94:04

Correct. You're not in your own head and

94:05

you're just you might even be laughing

94:07

at the student or you might be agreeing

94:08

with the teacher or vice versa or

94:10

sympathizing with the student. But

94:12

because you are a passive observer, you

94:14

can be more objective about it and you

94:15

aren't threatened or fearful and you can

94:16

learn better. And coming back to the

94:19

original point of you can't change

94:22

people. If you do want to change

94:24

someone's behavior, I I think the only

94:26

effective way to do it is to compliment

94:28

them when they do something you want.

94:30

Not to positive.

94:31

Yeah. Exactly. Not to insult them or be

94:32

negative or critical when they do

94:34

something you don't want. And we can't

94:35

help it. It's obviously in our nature to

94:37

criticize. And I do it as well, but it

94:39

just reminds me that like when somebody

94:42

does something praiseworthy, don't

94:43

forget to praise them. Like definitely

94:44

go out of your way and and it'll be

94:46

genuine. It has to be genuine. It can't

94:47

be a fake thing. uh this is not, you

94:50

know, one of those uh just dropping

94:52

compliments type thing eventually that

94:53

people will see through that. They want

94:54

authenticity, but just don't forget to

94:56

praise people when they do something

94:58

praiseworthy and you'll get more of that

94:59

behavior. There was a a really famous

95:01

thread on Reddit about five questions to

95:03

ask yourself if you're uncertain about

95:04

your relationship. One of the questions

95:06

was, "Are you truly in love with your

95:08

partner or just their potential or the

95:10

idea of them?" And that's the, you know,

95:13

they show such great promise. They they

95:15

look at their look at their ability for

95:16

for for change and growth. They they

95:19

they they're on the right path.

95:21

The partner matching thing is so hard.

95:23

Uh you know, when people come and ask me

95:24

like, "Oh, should I be with this

95:25

person?" Like, "Well, if you're asking

95:27

me, the answer is clearly no." Right?

95:30

Because you wouldn't have to ask if you

95:32

were with the right person or when you

95:34

ask someone like why they're uh in a

95:36

relationship with somebody and they

95:37

start reading out his or her resume,

95:39

right? That's also a bad sign.

95:41

What do you mean? Oh, it's like, oh, we

95:43

have so much in common. We like to golf

95:45

together. It's like, it's not a basis

95:47

for a relationship. Or, oh, you know,

95:49

she's a ballerina or, you know, he went

95:52

to Harvard or what have you. These are

95:53

resume items. That's not who the person

95:55

actually is.

95:55

What's a better answer?

95:57

I just love being with this person. I

95:59

just trust them. I, you know, I I enjoy

96:01

being around them. I I I love how

96:04

capable he is. I love how kind kind she

96:06

is. You know, I love her spirit. I love

96:08

his energy.

96:10

uh the more the the more materially and

96:14

concretely definable the reasons are

96:15

you're together the worse they are.

96:17

Uh the ineffable is actually where the

96:18

sort of true love lies

96:20

because real love is a form of unity.

96:22

It's a form of connection. It's

96:24

connecting spirits. Oh you two, my

96:26

consciousness meets your consciousness.

96:27

It's a the the the underlying drive uh

96:31

in love, in art, in uh science, in uh

96:36

mysticism is the desire for unity. It's

96:39

a desire for connection. As you know,

96:41

Bourhees famously wrote, "In every

96:43

human, there's a sense that something

96:45

infinite has been lost." You know,

96:47

there's a God-shaped hole in you you're

96:48

trying to fill.

96:49

And so, we're always trying to find that

96:52

connection. Love is trying to find it in

96:54

one other person and saying, "Okay,

96:56

you're male, I'm female, or whatever."

96:58

And you know, whatever your

96:59

predilictions are, and now now we

97:00

connect, now we form a hole uh connected

97:03

hole. Or in mysticism it's like it's all

97:06

about okay sit down meditate and you'll

97:08

feel the whole. In science it's like oh

97:10

uh you know atoms bouncing is mechanics

97:13

but that generates heat. So

97:15

thermodynamics and motion or kinetics

97:18

are one combined theory that's a whole.

97:19

Electricity and magnetism are one thing

97:21

that's that's the whole creates that

97:23

sense of awe. Uh in art it's like I feel

97:25

an emotion I create a piece of art

97:27

around it and then you see that painting

97:29

or you see the cysteine chapel or you

97:31

read the poem and you feel that emotion.

97:33

So again, it's it's creating unity. It's

97:35

creating connection. Uh and I think

97:37

everybody craves that. And so when you

97:41

really love somebody, it's because you

97:43

you feel a sense of wholeness by being

97:46

around them. Uh and that sense of

97:49

wholeness probably doesn't have anything

97:50

to do with what school they went to, you

97:52

know, or what career they're in. Just

97:55

sort of tying that into the life is

97:57

short, stop [ __ ] about. Uh if you're

98:00

faced with a difficult choice and you

98:01

cannot decide, the answer is no. And the

98:03

reason is modern society is full of

98:04

options.

98:05

Yeah.

98:06

Knowing this rationally sounds sounds

98:09

great, but having the courage to commit

98:13

to it in reality, I think is a different

98:15

task. And cutting your losses quickly in

98:17

the big three, relationships, jobs, and

98:20

locations is hard. What would you say to

98:24

someone who may cerebrally be able to

98:26

agree with you and say, "I understand."

98:29

My cousin said this about me. He said

98:32

that uh he said what I really he says

98:35

what I've really noticed about you is

98:36

your ability to walk away from

98:38

situations that are just not great

98:42

enough for you or not good enough for

98:44

you. And I think that is a

98:45

characteristic that I have. I will not

98:47

accept second best outcomes in my life.

98:50

Um

98:52

ultimately you will end up wherever is

98:55

acceptable to you. You will get out of

98:57

life whatever is acceptable to you. Um,

98:59

and there are certain things to me that

99:01

are very very important where I will not

99:04

settle for second best. But then there

99:06

are a lot of other things I just don't

99:07

care about because if I spend all my

99:09

time caring about those things, I don't

99:10

have the energy for the few things that

99:12

matter. And uh, so in decision-m I have

99:15

a few heristics for myself. Other people

99:17

can use their own, but mine are if you

99:19

can't decide, the answer is no. If

99:21

you're offered an opportunity, if you

99:23

have a new thing that you're saying yes

99:24

or no to that is a change from where

99:26

you're starting, the answer is by

99:28

default always no. Secondly, uh if you

99:32

have two decisions, if you have A or B

99:34

and both seem like very equal, take the

99:37

path that's more painful in the short

99:39

term, the one that's going to be painful

99:41

immediately because your brain is always

99:44

trying to avoid pain. So any pain that

99:47

is imminent, it is going to treat as

99:50

much larger than it actually is.

99:53

This is kind of like a decision-making

99:54

equivalent of Talib surgeon.

99:57

Uh tell surgeon where you want the

99:58

surgeon that doesn't look as good

99:59

because he's more likely to be a good

100:01

surgeon. Yeah, it's similar in that

100:02

appearances are deceiving because you're

100:04

avoiding conflict. You're avoiding pain.

100:06

So take the path is more painful in the

100:08

short term because your brain is

100:09

creating this illusion that the

100:10

short-term pain is greater than the

100:12

long-term pain. Because long-term yeah

100:14

you you'll commit your future self to

100:15

all kinds of long-term mana.

100:16

Mñana

100:17

exactly mñana. So take the more

100:20

short-term painful one. And then finally

100:22

the last one which I would credit Kapo

100:23

Gupta with uh is that you want to take

100:27

it take the choice that will leave you

100:29

more equinimous in the long term. By

100:31

quantumous he means like more at peace

100:33

more mental peace in the long term. So

100:34

whatever clears your mind more and will

100:36

have you having less self-t talk in the

100:38

future if you can model that out that is

100:40

probably the better route to go. And

100:42

then I would focus decision-m down on

100:44

the three things that really matter

100:46

because everything else is downstream of

100:48

these these three decisions. Especially

100:50

these are early life decisions. Later in

100:52

life, you have different things to

100:53

optimize for. But early in life, you're

100:55

trying to figure out who you're with,

100:57

what you're doing, and where you live.

100:59

And I think on all three of those, you

101:01

want to think you want to think pretty

101:02

hard about it. And people do some of

101:04

these unconsciously. You know, who

101:06

you're with very often it's like, well,

101:08

we were in a relationship. We stumbled

101:09

along. It felt okay. It had been enough

101:11

time, so we got married. Right? Not

101:14

great reasons. Maybe not terrible

101:16

reasons either. I mean, people who

101:18

overthink these things sometimes don't

101:19

get the right answer. But maybe here, if

101:21

you're the kind of person that's not

101:22

going to settle for second best, you

101:24

iterate. You iterate on a closed time

101:26

frame so you don't run out the clock.

101:27

And then you decide um on what you do.

101:31

You try a whole bunch of different

101:32

things until you find the one that feels

101:34

like play to you, looks like work to

101:36

others. You can't lose at it.

101:38

Um get some leverage. try to find some

101:40

practical application of it and go into

101:42

that. And then where you live, uh where

101:45

you live is really important. I don't

101:46

think people spend enough time on that

101:47

one. I think people pick cities randomly

101:49

based on where I went to school or where

101:51

my family happened to be or where uh my

101:54

friend was or I visited one weekend. I

101:56

really liked it. You really want to

101:57

think it through because where you live

101:59

really constrains and defines your

102:01

opportunities. Um it uh it it's going to

102:04

determine your friend circle. It's going

102:05

to determine your dating pool. It's

102:07

going to determine your job

102:08

opportunities. It's going to determine

102:09

the food and air and water quality that

102:11

you receive. Um, it's going to determine

102:13

your proximity to your family, which

102:15

might be important as you get older and

102:17

have kids. So, very, very, very

102:19

important decision. Weather, you know,

102:21

quality of life. How much do you stay

102:22

inside or outside? How long are you

102:24

going to live based on that?

102:25

And I think people choose that one

102:27

probably more poorly than they put a lot

102:29

less thought into that one than the

102:30

other two.

102:31

I in some ways, yeah, but also the

102:34

You're so right. How many people fall

102:35

backward into a relationship and before

102:37

they know it, we're living together, we

102:39

got a dog, we got a kid, we were married

102:41

and you know,

102:41

yeah. And then when you have kids,

102:42

because then that's half of you and half

102:44

of them running around, you're never

102:45

going to separate yourself from that. So

102:47

once you have a child with somebody,

102:48

then the most important thing in the

102:50

world to you is half that other person

102:52

whether you like them or not.

102:54

Mhm. Yeah. Uh Jeffrey Miller had a tweet

102:58

a long time ago that I always think

102:59

about and he said every parenting book

103:02

in the world could be replaced with one

103:03

book on behavioral genetics that I am a

103:06

big believer in genetics. Yes, I do

103:08

think a lot of behavior is downstream of

103:10

genetics and I think we underplay that.

103:12

We like to overplay nurture and

103:13

underplay nurture for sorry underplay

103:16

nature for societal reasons but nature

103:18

is a big deal. Um the temperament of the

103:20

person you marry is probably going to be

103:22

reflected in your child by default.

103:23

people want securely attached kid, pick

103:25

a securely attached partner.

103:27

Well, the secret to a happy relationship

103:28

is two happy people, right? So, I would

103:30

say if you want to be happy, then uh be

103:33

with a happy person. Don't think you're

103:34

going to be with someone who's unhappy

103:36

and then make them happy down the road.

103:38

Or if you're okay with them being

103:40

unhappy, but there are other things you

103:41

like about them, that's fine. But this

103:43

goes back to the unhappiness with other

103:45

things. Yes. And actually we we talked a

103:47

little bit about how people do connect

103:50

successfully, you know, on spirit and

103:52

and those things, but that's maybe a

103:54

little too abstract. If you want to get

103:56

a little more practical, it could be

103:57

based on values. And values are a set of

103:59

things you won't compromise on. Values

104:01

are the tough decisions of, oh, my

104:03

parent got sick. Do they move in with us

104:05

or do we put them in a in a nursing

104:06

home? Uh, you know, the ch do we give

104:09

the children money or do we not? uh you

104:12

know do we um do we move across the

104:15

country to be closer to our family or do

104:17

we stay put where we are uh you know do

104:20

we argue about politics do we care or do

104:22

we not right the values are way more

104:24

important than checklist items

104:27

uh and uh I think if people were to

104:29

align much more on their values they

104:31

would have much more successful

104:32

relationships

104:34

the emotional pain of of fearing change

104:38

I have this thing the job the location

104:40

the partner I'm going to enter or not

104:42

enter this thing. For the most part,

104:43

it's leaving. I think we have this sort

104:45

of loss aversion that that we really

104:47

feel

104:47

evolved loss aversion. It's just painful

104:49

separating yourself in front of your

104:50

friends. It's embarrassing. And

104:52

how how would you advise people to uh

104:54

get past themselves with the loss

104:55

aversion? That fear of change. Oh my

104:57

god, am I going to

104:58

Yeah, it's the hardest thing in the

104:59

world.

105:00

Uh starting over. It's back to the zero

105:02

to one thing. It's uh it's the mountain

105:04

climbing thing. You're not going to find

105:05

your path to the top of the mountain in

105:07

the first go around. Sometimes you go up

105:08

there, you get stuck, and you come back

105:10

down. And the difference between all the

105:12

successful people and the ones who are

105:13

not is the ones who are successful want

105:15

it so badly they're willing to go back

105:17

and start over again and again whether

105:19

in their career or in their

105:20

relationships or in anything else.

105:22

The more seriously you take yourself,

105:24

the unhappier you're going to be. You

105:27

learned how to take yourself less

105:28

seriously. Well, fame doesn't help on

105:30

that one because that is one of the

105:32

traps of fame. People are always talking

105:34

about you. they have a certain view of

105:36

you and you start believing that and

105:38

then you take yourself seriously and

105:39

then that limits your own actions. You

105:41

can't look like a fool anymore. Um you

105:43

can't do new things anymore. You know,

105:45

tomorrow I announce I'm a break dancer,

105:47

right? That's going to be met with a lot

105:48

of scorn and ridicule. But what if I

105:50

want to be back? I'd back I'd back you

105:52

if you want to make that.

105:53

Yeah. The truth is if I want to be a

105:54

break dancer, I'd be break dancing. But

105:56

uh you know like I'm starting a new

105:58

company 0ero to one again from scratch.

106:00

Let's do it you know one more time. uh

106:03

and not just going and raising a big VC

106:05

fund or retiring or what have you. But

106:07

that's because I want to build the

106:08

product. I want to see it exist. So I

106:10

think that you constantly just have to

106:11

force yourself. You have to remind

106:12

yourself. Um look, deep down you're

106:16

still the same Chris you were when you

106:17

were 9 years old. Deep down you're still

106:19

a kid. Uh you know, you're still curious

106:21

about the world. You still have a lot of

106:24

the same predilictions and desires and

106:26

wants. You've got a nice veneer on it.

106:28

But one of the nice things when you have

106:30

kids is you realize how much closer they

106:32

are to you in personality and knowledge

106:34

and knowhow. Like I look at my son who's

106:37

uh you know he's eight and uh I just

106:41

noticed like wow he's probably has 60 to

106:45

80% of my knowledge and development

106:47

wisdom and he has a lot more freedom and

106:49

he has a lot more spontaneity. In some

106:51

ways he's smarter and there's not a big

106:53

gap here left to close. this kid's going

106:55

to be, you know, done very soon. It

106:57

caught up to me.

106:58

And so to the extent that I think I know

107:00

better or that I'm somewhere or that I'm

107:03

someone, it's it's just an illusion.

107:04

It's is it's just a belief.

107:06

What's the lineage between that and

107:08

taking yourself too seriously?

107:10

I shouldn't take myself too seriously

107:12

because there's nothing here to take

107:13

that seriously. And if I take myself too

107:15

seriously, then I'm going to get

107:17

trapped. I'm going to get I'm going to

107:18

circumscribe myself again into a limited

107:21

set of behaviors and outcomes that keep

107:22

me from being free, keep me from being

107:24

spontaneous, keep me from being happy.

107:26

Um,

107:28

so it it just goes back to the, you

107:30

know, don't think about yourself too

107:31

much. There's a special type of pain in

107:35

realizing that the advice that you need

107:37

to hear right now is something that

107:41

almost always you learned a long time

107:42

ago and that you know you're basically

107:45

sort of the same person you were as you

107:47

were nine. You know a lot of the time

107:48

people ask questions like um what advice

107:50

do you wish that you would give yourself

107:51

10 years ago? People ask themselves that

107:53

question

107:55

almost invariably the advice that you

107:57

would give yourself 10 years ago is

107:58

still the advice that you need to hear

107:59

today.

107:59

Absolutely. That's why I did that

108:01

exercise of thinking back, you know, 10

108:03

years, 20 years, 30 years ago. What

108:04

advice would I give myself? For me, it's

108:06

just be less emotional.

108:08

Don't take don't take everything so

108:10

seriously. Do the same things, but do

108:12

them without all the emotional

108:14

turbulence.

108:15

And so, that's the advice I'm giving

108:17

myself going forward.

108:18

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's funny how

108:20

we need that distance to be able to be a

108:22

little bit more objective, to have a

108:24

little bit more perspective. And it's

108:25

almost a little bit of a trick, right?

108:27

Because typically when you do that you

108:28

say what would you tell a friend that

108:29

was going through this

108:30

right

108:30

and then you try and turn the advice to

108:33

the friend around onto yourself but you

108:35

always think well I'm not the friend you

108:37

go okay you 10 years ago there's enough

108:40

distance in that you go oh I actually am

108:41

still that person there's just a single

108:43

line between that

108:44

and and related to this story is I think

108:47

understanding is way more important than

108:50

discipline now Jaco would have a fit but

108:53

you know on physical things discipline

108:55

is important if I want To build a good

108:57

body, I got to work out on a regular

108:58

basis. But on mental things, I think

109:01

understanding is way more important.

109:03

Once you see the truth of something, you

109:04

cannot unsee it. All of us have had

109:07

experiences where we've seen a behavior

109:09

in a person and then it just changes

109:10

what we think about that person. We no

109:12

longer want to be friends with them or

109:13

we deeply respect them if it was, you

109:15

know, really good behavior that maybe

109:17

was observed unintentionally. Um so when

109:21

we when we really do see something

109:24

clearly it changes our behavior

109:26

immediately and that is far more

109:28

efficient than trying to change your

109:31

behavior through repetition.

109:33

Could you give me an example?

109:35

Um if you were let's say that you know

109:38

you have a friend and then that person

109:40

turns out to be a thief. You see that

109:42

person stealing something you're done

109:44

with them.

109:45

uh if you are uh you know the the

109:48

smoking lung cancer example is a good

109:50

one right someone close to you or

109:52

anytime someone close to you dies or you

109:54

even hear about someone dying you hear

109:56

about someone dying what's the first

109:57

thing you do the first thing assuming

109:59

that you weren't that close to them

110:00

obviously you're close to them it's

110:01

different but if you weren't that close

110:02

to them but you know you hear about

110:03

someone in your extended social dying

110:05

you immediately start trying to

110:06

different distinguish yourself from them

110:08

you're like oh well how old was this

110:10

person you know did they have were they

110:12

a smoker you know did they have an issue

110:13

do I have that issue, right? You

110:15

immediately start comparing and what

110:17

what you're what you're doing there is

110:18

you're sort of just trying to see if

110:22

there's an overlap here. But if you see

110:23

the truth in something, if if you're

110:25

like, "Oh my god, this person was the

110:26

same age as me and they died." And

110:27

that's starting to happen at my age

110:29

where I'm starting to hear about, you

110:30

know, extended circle people

110:33

just reminds you time is really short.

110:34

There's a truth there. There's a truth

110:35

there that you cannot action.

110:38

There's a truth there that you cannot

110:39

unsee. Uh, you know, or for example, I

110:42

think were you into bodybuilding or

110:44

something back when? I don't know.

110:46

Like bro lifting stuff of a skinny

110:49

[ __ ] Yeah.

110:49

Right. But there probably was a point

110:51

where you were uh being really aggro in

110:54

the gym and you injured yourself

110:56

many times.

110:57

Right. And each one of those was an deep

110:59

understanding of don't go beyond this

111:01

point, right? There was a truth there.

111:03

So again, when you when you see these

111:05

things in such a way that you can't

111:07

unsee them, that changes your behavior

111:10

instantly. And I would argue that that

111:12

introspection to find those truths is

111:15

actually very useful. Is that a

111:17

justification for more experimentation,

111:19

exploration,

111:21

experience in life, sort of trying to

111:23

find serendipity because all of these

111:24

experiences are going to teach you a

111:27

inescapable lesson.

111:29

You're going to do what you're going to

111:30

do. I mean, your level of exploration, I

111:32

think, is sort of up to you. But life is

111:35

always throwing truth back at you. Uh,

111:38

it's about whether you choose to see it,

111:40

whether you choose to acknowledge it.

111:42

Uh, even if it's painful. Truth is often

111:44

painful, right? If it wasn't, we'd all

111:46

be seeing truth all the time. Reality is

111:47

always reflecting truth. That's all it

111:49

is.

111:49

Why would you not have accessed it

111:50

already?

111:51

Exactly. Uh, you know, all the all the

111:53

philosophy that's out there, for

111:54

example, uh, it's almost trit. Like most

111:58

people they look at philosophy like

112:00

until they discover it for themselves

112:02

and because because wisdom is the set of

112:04

things that that cannot be transmitted.

112:06

If they could be transmitted, you know,

112:08

we'd read the same five philosophy books

112:09

and we'd all be done. We'd all be wise.

112:11

You have to learn it for yourself. It

112:13

has to be rediscovered for yourself in

112:14

your own context. You have to have

112:16

specific experiences that then allow you

112:18

to generalize and see the truth in those

112:20

things in such a way that you're not

112:22

going to unsee them. But each person is

112:24

going to see them in a different way. I

112:26

can tell you that Socrates story and

112:28

it's not going to resonate until there's

112:30

something that other people desire that

112:32

you realize you yourself don't want. And

112:35

the moment that happens, then you'll see

112:36

the truth in the general statement.

112:38

I want to just read you a twominute

112:40

essay that I wrote uh a couple of weeks

112:42

ago. So, it's called unteachable

112:44

lessons.

112:44

Okay.

112:45

I've been thinking about a special

112:46

category of lesson, one which you cannot

112:48

discover without experiencing it

112:49

firsthand. There is a certain subset of

112:51

advice that for some reason we all

112:53

refuse to learn through instruction.

112:55

These are unteachable lessons. No matter

112:57

how arduous or costly or effortful it is

112:59

going to be for us to find out

113:00

ourselves, we prefer to disregard the

113:03

mountains of warnings from our elders,

113:04

songs, literature, historical

113:06

catastrophes, public scandals, and

113:08

instead think some version of, "Yeah,

113:10

that might be true for them, but not for

113:13

me." We decide to learn the hard lessons

113:15

the hard way over and over again.

113:18

Unfortunately, they all seem to be the

113:19

big things, too. It's never new insights

113:22

about how to put up level shelves or

113:24

charmingly introduce yourself at a

113:25

cocktail party. Instead, we spend most

113:28

of our lives learning firsthand the most

113:30

important lessons that the previous

113:31

generations already warned us about.

113:34

Things like money won't make you happy.

113:36

Fame won't fix your self worth. You

113:38

don't love that pretty girl. She's just

113:40

hot and difficult to get. Nothing is as

113:42

important as you think it is when you're

113:44

thinking about it. You will regret

113:45

working too much. Worrying is not

113:47

improving your performance. All your

113:49

fears are a waste of time. You should

113:50

see your parents more. You'll be fine

113:52

after the breakup and will be grateful

113:54

that you did it. It's perfectly okay to

113:56

cut toxic people out of your life. And

113:58

even reading this list back, I'm rolling

114:00

my eyes at how [ __ ] trite it is.

114:03

These are all basic [ __ ] obvious

114:05

insights that everybody has heard

114:07

before. But if they're so basic, why

114:10

does everyone so reliably fall prey to

114:12

them throughout our lives? And if

114:14

they're so obvious, why do people who

114:15

have recently become famous or wealthy

114:17

or lost a parent or gone through a

114:19

breakup start to proclaim these facts

114:21

with the renewed grandio ceremony of

114:23

someone who's just gone through

114:24

religious revelation? It's also a very

114:27

contentious list of points to say on the

114:29

internet. If you interview a billionaire

114:30

who says that all of his money didn't

114:32

make him happy, or a movie star who said

114:34

that her fame felt like a prison, the

114:35

internet will tear them apart for being

114:37

ungrateful and out of touch. So, not

114:39

only do we refuse to learn these

114:41

lessons, we even refuse to hear the

114:43

message from those warning us about

114:44

them. And even more than that, I think

114:47

for every one of these, if I consider a

114:49

bit deeper, I can recall a time,

114:51

including right now, where I convinced

114:53

myself that I am the exception to the

114:55

rule. That my particular mental makeup

114:58

or life situation or historical wounds

115:00

or dreams for the future render me

115:02

immune to these lessons being

115:04

applicable. No, no, no. My inner

115:06

landscape would be solved by skirting

115:08

around the most well-known wisdom of the

115:10

ages. No, no, no. I can thread this

115:13

needle properly. Watch me dance through

115:15

the minefield and avoid all of the trip

115:17

wires that everyone else kicks. And then

115:19

you kick one. And you share a knowing

115:22

luck, the kind that can only occur

115:24

between two people who have been hurt in

115:26

the exact same way. And a voice in the

115:28

back of your mind will say, "I told you

115:30

so."

115:31

That's unable.

115:33

It's a good essay. I I think one of the

115:35

reasons why these lessons are

115:36

unteachable is because uh they're too

115:38

broad. They have to be applied in

115:40

context. A number of the ones that you

115:42

laid out contradict each other. Like

115:43

spend more time with your parents and

115:45

you know don't work so hard but you know

115:47

at the same time you do want to be

115:50

successful, right? I think I think a lot

115:52

of these lessons come from down on high

115:54

from as you said like the famous movie

115:56

star or the billionaire saying oh you

115:58

don't need to be happy. It's like well

115:59

okay then give it up [ __ ] right? Uh so

116:04

in reality I think many of these

116:05

contradict each other and they it's like

116:07

if you went to school and you just

116:09

studied philosophy for four years you

116:10

would not know how to live life because

116:11

you wouldn't know which philosophical

116:13

doctrine to apply in which circumstance.

116:15

Uh you have to actually live life go

116:18

through all of the issues to figure out

116:20

what it is that you want. What's the

116:22

context in which some of these things

116:23

apply and some of them don't. Um, yes,

116:25

you want to visit your parents more

116:26

often, but you don't want to live with

116:27

your parents and you don't want to

116:29

necessarily see them every day or every

116:30

weekend depending on the parent. You

116:32

might not get along with one of them.

116:33

So, I think it is highly contextual. Um,

116:36

that said, I I I would argue that once

116:39

you figure it out for yourself, you can

116:41

kind of carve these variations on these

116:44

maxims that apply to you and uh then

116:47

you'll have a specific experience that

116:49

helps you remember it and actually

116:51

execute on it. And you can also phrase

116:53

it in a way where it's not trit anymore.

116:55

So like

116:57

Yeah. So so a lot of my maxims and notes

116:59

to self are carved in a way that they're

117:01

modernized. They're saying something

117:03

true which might be trit if I didn't say

117:05

it in a new way or in an interesting way

117:07

that is more relevant to me today.

117:09

There was a Nobel Prize winner who said

117:11

something to the effect of uh everything

117:13

worth saying may have been said before

117:15

but given that nobody was listening it

117:17

must be said again.

117:18

Yeah. It has to be said again has to be

117:19

recontextualized for the modern age.

117:21

things do change, technology changes,

117:23

things culture changes, people change.

117:25

on that. I've heard you say uh you talk

117:28

about the difference between seeming

117:29

wise and being wise that uh you tried to

117:33

appear smart as a kid uh by sort of

117:36

wrote memorization masquerading as

117:38

insight and wisdom and uh I I certainly

117:41

feel that you know a lot of the show for

117:43

me I think has been was and still is a

117:47

redemption arc from this you know decade

117:50

of my life where I completely suppressed

117:52

any intellectual curiosity. It's like,

117:54

okay, I'll be a professional party boy

117:55

for 10 years, stand on the front door of

117:57

a nightclub and give out VIP wristbands

117:59

and have access to all of the pretty

118:00

girls or, you know, the cool parties or

118:02

whatever it might be.

118:02

Seems like it worked out. Okay,

118:04

it did in some ways. I mean,

118:06

isn't that fun?

118:06

It's it it was look, it was a good way

118:08

to spend my 20ies, but to sort of

118:11

come back above, put your head above

118:13

water, two degrees, one of which was a

118:14

masters, and then this like just shut

118:16

down any of that learn. I mean, I I did

118:18

that while I was at uni. While I was at

118:20

uni, I was running the events. So, it's

118:22

actually a decade and a half. And uh I

118:24

think there was a big redemption arc

118:26

within this show. And I I constantly

118:28

have to kind of

118:30

wipe the slime off me of this sense that

118:34

I need to prove myself. And so much of

118:35

it, this why it really resonates with

118:37

me. Um when you're memorizing things

118:39

that indicates that you don't understand

118:40

them or that sort of yeah, wrote

118:43

memorization and regurgitation

118:45

masquerading as wisdom. Um because

118:48

people use fluency as a proxy for

118:50

truthfulness and insight. They use the

118:52

complexity of your language and your

118:53

communication.

118:54

Yeah. There's a lot of jargon out there.

118:56

I think it's it's it's the mark of a

118:58

charlatan to explain a simple thing in a

119:01

complex way. And so when you see people

119:03

using very complicated language to

119:05

explain simple things, they're either

119:07

trying to impress you and offiscate or

119:09

they don't understand it themselves.

119:10

Well, there's an allure in that though.

119:11

You know, this was one of the things I

119:13

had to do when I went to therapy. It's

119:14

kind of an interesting I think I've

119:15

talked about this before. Um, I needed

119:18

to turn off podcast Chris when I stepped

119:20

into therapy because most of the time

119:23

that I spend one-on-one in a deep

119:24

conversation that's undistracted

119:26

throughout the week. I trained myself

119:27

over, you know, when I started doing it

119:29

700 episodes now, 900, whatever. Uh, and

119:32

I I knew what I could do to say to this

119:36

therapist some, you know, to just sort

119:39

of veer off a little and create some

119:41

nice story, put a bow on it, push it

119:42

across the table, and watch your eyes

119:44

light up a little bit, like a little

119:45

grin or a self-deprecating joke or

119:47

whatever. I'm like, you're not here.

119:49

You're you're performing. You're doing

119:51

this. You're doing the Chris Williamson

119:53

thing with the sort of jazz hands.

119:54

So, I have my own version.

119:56

Okay, tell me.

119:56

Okay, so you have podcast Chris. I have

119:58

podcast guest Naval.

120:00

Precisely. So very often I'll uh think

120:03

of something. I'll have some what I

120:04

think is an insight and I want to tweet

120:07

it or write it down, but in my mind I'm

120:10

talking about it on a podcast. That's

120:12

kind of how my mind registers it. And

120:14

for a while I thought this was a bad

120:16

thing and I tried to eradicate podcastal

120:18

and then I just realized that's just how

120:20

it comes out. So I might as well just be

120:22

okay with it.

120:23

Now do you know the reason I'm on this

120:24

podcast? No. You know, I haven't done a

120:26

proper formal interview straight up top

120:29

whatever 10 20 podcasts in a long time

120:31

since Rogan maybe.

120:32

Probably since Rogan. Yep. Yeah, it went

120:34

out at the top, right? That was a

120:35

theory.

120:35

Yeah. Well, it's still at the top.

120:37

Yeah. Yeah, I know. And and then, you

120:38

know, I've done some stuff with Tim Tim

120:40

Ferrris, a good friend, but that's been

120:41

more co-hosting. I haven't been a guest.

120:44

Um, and then I did one or two random

120:45

things where I just stumbled into a

120:47

thing where I, you know, there was a

120:48

reason, but it wasn't like this.

120:50

And I reached out to you for this one,

120:52

right? I have lots of people reaching

120:54

out to me for podcasts. I do not answer

120:56

them. I reached out to you.

120:57

And the reason is a really funny one.

120:59

It's because when I am playing podcast

121:02

in the vault in my head, for some

121:03

reason, you're on the other side. And I

121:06

don't know why. I literally don't know

121:07

why. It's not like I've even seen many

121:08

of your podcasts. I think I've seen some

121:09

snippets here and there, but for some

121:12

reason, you were the guy in the podcast

121:15

in podcast.

121:16

And so, I was like, I might as well just

121:18

do it. So, I reached out to you. I

121:19

wonder if this will close that loop or

121:21

further entrench it. I wonder if you've

121:23

made it way worse now and you're just

121:24

gonna have Well, first off, it was a

121:26

dream and now it's reality plus a dream

121:27

and I can't get away from him.

121:29

Yeah, there are enough people that I

121:30

turned down where I said I'm just not

121:31

doing podcasts. I feel bad about that. I

121:33

got to go back and do those podcasts.

121:35

But I probably wear out my luck. I have

121:36

nothing new to talk about. So, I don't

121:38

know what I'm going to say.

121:38

Well, I appreciate you you said on Rogan

121:41

and this was something, you know, to

121:42

kind of pay it back to you. Uh, I had a

121:45

a fiveheaded Mount Rushmore of guests

121:48

before I started this show and it was

121:50

Jordan Peterson, Sam Harris, Alanderon

121:53

from the School of Life, you and Rogan,

121:54

and that was my uh hydra of Mount

121:58

Rushmore.

121:58

And uh I knew I think someone had asked

122:03

you at some point, maybe it was a tweet

122:04

or something after Rogan or maybe even

122:06

said it on Rogan where you said, "Uh, I

122:07

don't like to say the same thing twice,

122:09

at least not in the same way."

122:10

I don't like sequels. Yeah.

122:11

Yeah. And I really really respected

122:14

that. You know, that was 2019. You said

122:16

it was uh eight or nine years ago. It

122:18

wasn't as long ago as you.

122:19

I have a terrible memory.

122:20

Yeah. Yeah. Um

122:21

you're right. 2019 right before co

122:23

Yes. And uh I really appreciated that

122:26

because there is something

122:29

the content game you can continue to

122:32

sort of I'm sure I'll have said many

122:33

things today that the the audience will

122:35

have already heard but uh

122:38

caring enough about having novel

122:41

insights or at least having a new

122:44

perspective on similar insights to say

122:46

oh well you know in the space of six

122:48

years since you were on Joe a lot of

122:50

these well I'm coming at them actually

122:52

the first thing I said to you today like

122:54

I'm not convinced that I actually fully

122:56

agree with that thing that I used to

122:57

say, which is cool, right? That's you

122:59

showing that the um position that you

123:03

put in the ground previously is not a

123:04

tether. It's not you being held to it

123:07

anymore.

123:07

Well, I I think the reason why I wanted

123:09

to be on this is because

123:12

for some reason I have the impression

123:14

that you engage in conversations and I

123:16

like conversations. I don't like

123:18

interviews. Mhm.

123:19

This is why I was doing my last startup

123:20

air chat, which was all about

123:22

conversations.

123:23

And conversations to me are more

123:25

genuine. They're more authentic. There's

123:27

a give and take. There's a back and

123:28

forth. There's a genuine curiosity. It's

123:29

not to say the other podcasters don't do

123:31

it. They absolutely do do it. But for

123:32

some reason in my mind, I had you as a

123:35

guy that I would actually have a

123:36

conversation with. And sure enough, you

123:38

just read me your essay, which I don't

123:40

think anybody else would really do,

123:41

right? That implies there's a give and

123:43

take. There's a genuine curiosity. And I

123:45

think that's useful because then uh

123:47

certain inexplicit knowledge that I had

123:50

will be surfaced for myself. And I think

123:53

that's helpful.

123:53

Well, you're seeing, you know, to kind

123:55

of break the fourth wall a bit, you're

123:56

seeing very much of uh some of the

124:00

gateway drug insights that you had that

124:04

you just don't get to choose. I'm aware

124:06

that you kind of have an anti-guru

124:08

sentiment in you, like a very strong

124:10

like don't listen to me. I don't know

124:11

what I'm doing.

124:12

Is a trap. No, guru is a trap. do not

124:14

follow me, do not bow to me, do not do

124:15

any of the other things to me. But, uh,

124:18

if you see resonance in another person,

124:22

and I think this is what we're all

124:23

trying to find. You know, people can

124:25

complain about the mountains of content

124:27

creation that happens and and maybe

124:29

rightly so. Um, but if you're able to

124:32

find someone and you see in them a

124:35

little bit of you, maybe not even much

124:37

of you, but like, oh, that bit of them,

124:39

their self-esteem or the way they look

124:41

at relationships or what they want to

124:42

do, the kind of life they want or the

124:43

level of peace of mind that they want to

124:44

have or whatever it might be.

124:46

If you find in somebody else a little

124:48

bit of that, it's kind of like what

124:50

you're saying before, you can't you can

124:52

no longer be unconvinced of that and it

124:56

it steps in and becomes a part of you.

124:58

And uh yeah, you're maybe seeing

124:59

reflected back to you some you know this

125:02

sort of percolated very meandering

125:05

insight from however long ago that

125:07

something's happened and maybe in you

125:09

know 5 years time you'll be like you

125:11

know that thing that you said about the

125:12

lessons and then I don't know it's cool

125:15

that's like synthesis right it's this

125:17

sort of blending of the reason I spend a

125:19

lot of time in San Francisco is because

125:21

it's a gravitational attractor for the

125:23

smartest people in the world and despite

125:25

all the many problems the city had is

125:28

mismanaged beyond belief. Um it does

125:31

just seem to pull in the young smart

125:35

creative people. Uh not just the ones

125:37

who are building technology, but they're

125:39

exploring every facet of life and

125:41

they're weird and sometimes it's

125:42

repulsive and it's bizarre, but you talk

125:45

to these people and you just see a very

125:47

intelligent person coming at life in a

125:49

completely different way. um putting it

125:51

through the cominatorics of human DNA

125:53

which are uncountable and giving you a

125:57

weird perspective that can twist your

125:59

mind around. And to do that, you always

126:02

have to be learning. You you have you

126:04

can't be in a guru mentality. If I'm

126:06

with somebody and they're listening to

126:09

every word I say and hanging on it,

126:10

that's not interesting for me. I'm not

126:11

going to learn anything. Um, I want

126:14

people who are intelligent, who will say

126:17

something back that is a little

126:18

different and I may not agree with it,

126:19

but it's going to leave a mark. It's

126:21

going to leave an impression

126:22

and it's going to leave an impression to

126:23

the extent that both that they are

126:25

correct and that I choose to listen and

126:27

I'll choose to listen if I don't view

126:29

myself as higher status or smarter than

126:31

them. The flip side of that is I'm not

126:34

really impressed by high status people

126:36

like I don't just because the case

126:39

pretty much in fact uh most of my

126:41

friends who have gone on to become very

126:44

uh famous or successful the more famous

126:46

successful they've been the less I spend

126:48

time with them um partially because they

126:50

get surrounded by an army of sickop fans

126:52

which gets hard to break through uh and

126:54

because I don't want anything from them

126:55

and I don't and I don't like that I

126:57

don't like these situations in which

126:59

transactional relationships are

127:00

implied that can be a though to people

127:02

who are up that because the higher that

127:04

they climb up that hierarchy, the fewer

127:05

and fewer people don't want anything

127:07

from them. So in that way you have an

127:09

even better friend,

127:10

right? But they get they get surrounded

127:12

by people who do want things from them

127:13

and are so good at pretending they don't

127:15

that it's just not worth my time to try

127:17

and break out from that group.

127:19

Um so it does get lonely at the top so

127:21

to speak. But it's also by choice

127:23

because you know it's

127:25

you can problem.

127:26

Yeah, you can be your own best friend

127:28

too. I am my own best friend actually.

127:30

So, I really do enjoy spending time with

127:32

myself.

127:33

Yeah. The smartest people aren't

127:34

interested in appearing smart and don't

127:36

care what you think is.

127:38

Yeah. I mean, a a lot of life is not

127:41

giving a [ __ ] You know, a lot of the

127:42

best things in life come out of that.

127:45

Does this mean

127:48

sort of talking about that wrote

127:49

memorization masquerading as wisdom and

127:52

insight thing which I think

127:55

perhaps almost certainly uh podcasts

127:57

like this will have contributed to. you

127:59

know, you hear a an Alanderoton who's,

128:02

you know, like a painter with words. Uh,

128:05

very simple, very sort of unpretentious,

128:07

but if you're intellectually curious,

128:09

you see, you only see the production of

128:14

his thoughts. You don't necessarily see

128:17

the work that's gone into the thoughts

128:18

behind. So, you confuse the presentation

128:21

of them for the insight. Does that make

128:23

sense?

128:24

Of course. Yeah. A lot of my stuff is

128:25

more polished. Like one of the funny

128:27

things, yeah, one of the funny things

128:29

that uh right before this uh podcast was

128:32

I thought maybe I should go back and

128:34

read my old tweets

128:35

to sort of remember what I said and I

128:36

can articulate it well. But then I

128:38

realized that's just performance. I

128:39

would just be memorizing my whole stuff

128:41

to perform. I

128:42

Well, that's an extra special level of

128:44

hell that you've descended into. I wrote

128:46

memorizing me to be more mely.

128:47

Bingo. And and to live up to some

128:49

expectation or some uh famous

128:52

personality that I now have to become

128:53

some straight jacket that I have to put

128:55

on. I'm having to live up to in private

128:57

the things that I prefer.

128:58

That's right. So, of course, pretty

128:59

quickly I saw through that, you know,

129:00

it's nonsense and it also constrains my

129:02

time and it's just work and it

129:03

I think that's that's, you know, your

129:04

meditation practice at work there, that

129:06

mindfulness gap to be like, huh?

129:08

Yeah, there's that thing again in

129:10

Exactly. Exactly. So, it's not about

129:12

changing your thoughts. It's not about

129:14

fixing your thoughts. It's not about

129:15

changing yourself. It's just about being

129:16

observant of yourself so that you can

129:18

then it'll automatically change.

129:20

Whatever change needs to happen will

129:22

happen. you trying to change yourself is

129:24

very circular. Um the mind trying to

129:27

change the mind, the mind doesn't like

129:28

wrestling with itself. I don't I don't

129:30

think it gets you anywhere.

129:31

You've spent a lot of time either

129:33

creating wealth or thinking about how to

129:35

create wealth. What have you learned are

129:38

the best places to spend wealth?

129:42

To spend wealth.

129:43

Yeah. Yeah. How you you spend this time

129:45

creating this wealth

129:48

accumulating? How does what are the best

129:50

ways for you to put it back out?

129:53

I actually think Elon had this one

129:55

figured out, which is he plowed his own

129:56

money back into his own businesses to go

129:58

and do bigger and better things for

130:00

humanity. Um, so what I would like to,

130:04

you know, you could give it to

130:05

nonprofits, but a lot of nonprofits are

130:07

grifty or it's people who didn't earn it

130:08

trying to spend it or they don't have

130:10

tight feedback loops on having a good

130:11

effect. So, one of the things I want to

130:14

do as an aside is I want to create a

130:16

little school for young physicists. But

130:17

that's that's my nonprofit.

130:18

A young physicist.

130:19

Yeah, that that that's my nonprofit

130:21

thing. But uh and I've been and I've

130:23

actually uh underwritten uh

130:27

media and some physics stuff. I don't

130:29

like to talk about it. So I don't I

130:31

don't talk about my whatever so-called

130:32

philanthropy because I think that makes

130:34

it less real. That makes it more status

130:35

oriented.

130:36

Makes it less philanthropic.

130:37

Yeah. Exactly. And then people

130:38

look at how charitable my charity is.

130:39

And then people also come hunting for

130:41

money. So there's all that disease. I

130:42

don't believe in giving to schools. They

130:44

have enough money. Ivy Leagues have

130:45

enough money and they don't know how to

130:46

spend it.

130:47

So I think the best use of money is I

130:49

think a good business creates a product

130:51

for people that they voluntarily buy and

130:54

they get value out of. So in that sense

130:57

I think Steve Jobs and Elon and and uh

130:59

entrepreneurs like that have created a

131:01

lot of value for the world. So one of

131:03

the things I can do is I can take my own

131:04

money and I can invest it in myself to

131:07

go and build the next great thing that I

131:09

think needs to exist. And that's

131:11

basically what I'm doing right now. I'm

131:12

doing a new business. I'm self-unding

131:13

it. Um, I'm plying a lot of money into

131:16

it. I'm going to build something that I

131:17

think is beautiful, that I want to see

131:18

exist. Um, I really want to see exist.

131:21

Have you spoken about this yet or is it

131:22

still dark mode?

131:23

It's so early. It's Yeah, maybe I'll

131:25

show it to you in a few months. Uh,

131:27

hopefully 6 months.

131:28

Um, and uh, I'm excited about it and

131:31

that's a good use of money.

131:33

What about the worst places to spend

131:34

wealth?

131:36

What is the old line? If it flies,

131:38

floats or fornicates. Well, very nice

131:41

way to change the final F. Very

131:43

impressive.

131:44

That's the way I heard it. Can't take

131:46

credit for that.

131:46

I'm pretty sure it's Fox, but yeah.

131:48

Yeah. Yeah. I think that was u

131:50

Maybe it was uh Felix Dennis.

131:52

Okay.

131:53

Who who had that quote.

131:54

Yeah. He said, "If a flies floats or

131:55

fornicates rented I I think the last one

131:57

was a little too

132:00

it's wrong that he he didn't have a

132:02

family, didn't have kids." So, you know,

132:03

he missed the big one.

132:05

Um

132:06

but yeah, there there are lots of bad

132:08

ways to spend money. Uh I I I believe in

132:10

investment, you know, I don't believe in

132:12

consumption. Uh yes, you can you're born

132:14

with a short housing position. You close

132:15

that out, you get yourself a nice house.

132:17

Um get yourself some help to free up

132:19

your time so you're not doing uh things

132:21

that other people can do better. Um

132:24

treat people well. You know, always

132:25

overpay and expect the best.

132:27

Uh pay them like they're the best and

132:29

expect the best. Um, but overall I think

132:32

a good use of money is to take risks and

132:35

build things and do things that other

132:37

people can't do. Align it with your own

132:40

unique talent so you can keep delivering

132:41

to the world. I'm not going to sit idle.

132:43

Uh, I'm not going to retire. That's a

132:45

that's a waste of whatever time I have

132:47

left on this earth.

132:48

Um, and if I'm doing something I enjoy,

132:50

then I'm already in perpetual

132:52

retirement. Um,

132:53

because work is just a set of things you

132:55

want to do that that that you have to do

132:57

that you don't want to do. So if you

132:59

want to do it, it's not work. Um, and so

133:01

there are things that I want to do don't

133:03

feel like work. I can put money behind

133:05

them and I can use that to make

133:07

instantiate them into reality. And I

133:09

don't want to say make the world a

133:10

better place cuz that's too trit, but

133:12

it's more just create a product that I'm

133:14

proud of that wouldn't exist otherwise

133:16

that other people will get tremendous

133:18

value.

133:18

And it's been enabled through wealth

133:20

because you're able to take a level of

133:21

risk that you wouldn't have been able to

133:22

otherwise.

133:23

Exactly. Yeah. Wealth gives you freedom.

133:24

It gives you freedom to explore more

133:26

options. And in my case, it gives me

133:28

freedom to start businesses without

133:29

having to ask other people for

133:31

permission or to warp my vision based on

133:35

uh their desires to make a return or how

133:38

they think money should be made.

133:40

Is there anything that you'd add to the

133:42

how to get rich thread? Is there

133:44

anything where you thought [ __ ] like

133:45

just one if I could go in and edit and

133:48

add one more in or or

133:49

No, there's like 10,000 things. I could

133:51

talk about that topic forever to be

133:52

honest. like that that that thread was

133:54

so short and it was so limited and it

133:56

was so like you know crafted in a sense

133:58

although I wrote it very spontaneously

134:01

um it left so much on the cutting room

134:03

floor that I could just talk about that

134:04

topic for days but

134:07

it's all contextual right business is

134:09

very very very contextual like you have

134:11

to look at the particular business and

134:13

understand what's being done and why

134:15

it's being done and how it's being done

134:16

and then you can tear it apart or you

134:18

can re and then reassemble it properly

134:21

um and I like to think that That is

134:22

actually where I have specific knowledge

134:24

and expertise. My specific knowledge,

134:25

expertise is not in happiness, not in

134:27

philosophy, not Yes, my life is very

134:29

hacked to be very unique.

134:32

But I don't think that's where my

134:33

specific knowledge is. My specific

134:35

knowledge is in being able to analyze a

134:38

business, especially a technology

134:39

business, and take it apart at the seams

134:41

and predict in advance what is likely to

134:43

work and what is not likely to work.

134:45

clubhouse notwithstanding.

134:48

Um because you're still going to be

134:51

wrong most of the time. It's like

134:52

playing the lottery, but you know one or

134:53

two of the tickets numbers in advance.

134:55

You only have to be right a few times or

134:56

even just once to to get the big score.

134:59

Um you know, Peter Thiel started PayPal,

135:01

but he made all his money on Facebook,

135:03

right? And now he's done more since

135:04

then, obviously. But that was the big

135:06

winner. And that's true in any power law

135:08

distribution. Number one is going to

135:09

return more than two through n put

135:11

together. Two will return more than

135:12

three through put together. you're

135:13

operating in a highly leveraged

135:15

intellectual domain. So the outcomes are

135:17

going to be nonlinear. Um so I I know a

135:20

lot about that topic, but it's highly

135:22

contextual. It makes a lot more sense if

135:24

there's a specific business in front of

135:25

me, a specific entrepreneur, and I can

135:27

take that apart and I can say, you know,

135:29

so there are certain companies where

135:30

I'll say, "Oh, this is not going to work

135:33

because you, the entrepreneur, are doing

135:35

this for the wrong reasons. You're

135:37

you're doing A so you can get to B. Just

135:39

go to B." Or, "You're doing this to make

135:40

money." when really the person who's

135:42

doing this because they love the product

135:44

is going to beat you or you're raising

135:46

money from the wrong people who are in

135:47

it for the wrong reasons or your

135:49

co-founder is not in it for the right

135:50

reasons or you don't have the right kind

135:52

of co-founder or your vesting schedule

135:54

is wrong or you're starting the business

135:56

in the wrong place or you're approaching

135:58

it from this angle instead of that angle

136:00

and and of course I'll be wrong too but

136:02

I've just seen a lot of data I have my

136:04

theories around it uh and that's where I

136:06

feel very comfortable operating the

136:08

problem is when I have to talk about how

136:10

to create wealth and how to get rich is

136:12

a clickbait title deliberately. But when

136:14

I talk about how to create wealth,

136:16

talking about it in the abstract is very

136:20

difficult because then you just want to

136:21

speak truth. You have to just say the

136:23

timeless stuff. You have to be right in

136:25

almost every context and so it really

136:27

limits what you can say.

136:28

The lack of specificity makes it Yeah.

136:30

Correct. It's back to philosophy. But

136:31

when I if I can get specific about it,

136:34

you know, that's when that's when the

136:35

real knowledge could be like a counselor

136:37

for people.

136:37

Yeah. part of the reason why I started

136:39

doing podcasts and you know this is ego

136:41

at play so I'll admit it freely when I

136:43

was tweeting you know I kind of

136:46

pioneered philosophy Twitter if you will

136:48

or a certain kind of practical

136:49

philosophy Twitter where in 140

136:51

characters I would try to say something

136:53

true in an interesting way that was

136:55

insightful to me at the time but then

136:57

that got copied there's thousands of us

136:59

now right thousands of people spitting

137:00

it out chat GPT trying to create these

137:02

things all day long um although I like

137:05

to say I like to think that my stuff is

137:06

incompressible I'm saying it in the

137:08

tightest way possible.

137:10

Um, which is kind of a little failed

137:11

poetry background. Um, but what I

137:14

realized was if you truly have a deep

137:16

understanding of something, then you can

137:18

talk about it all day long. Then you can

137:20

rederive everything you need from that

137:22

understanding. No memorization required.

137:24

You can get to it from first principles

137:26

and every piece of what you know is is

137:29

like a it's like a Lego block that just

137:31

fits in and forms a steel frame. It's

137:33

solid. It's locked in there. And so on a

137:35

podcast, I can unload much more deeply

137:38

about some of these topics. Um, so for

137:41

example, we can talk about any business

137:42

you like, but it has to be in context.

137:44

It has to be real. It has to be an

137:47

actual problem. Then we can solve it.

137:49

I I just really love that heristic of if

137:52

you're having to memorize something,

137:53

it's because you don't understand it.

137:54

You don't understand it. That's right.

137:55

If you if you if you have to memorize

137:57

something, it's because you don't

137:58

understand it. And if you understand

137:59

something, you don't have to memorize

138:00

it.

138:03

Yeah. I again, you know, just to sort of

138:06

call out

138:08

a lot of what I tried to do this

138:10

redemption arc thing of if I sound

138:13

smart, that's like being smart, right?

138:15

You go, well, chat GPT has memorized the

138:18

entire internet. Good luck competing

138:20

with that.

138:21

You're not going to beat it in

138:22

memorization. You're not even going to

138:23

beat a library at memorization. You're

138:24

not going to beat any 10 books in

138:25

memorization. So memorization is not the

138:29

thing. Understand

138:29

the value of memorization is going down

138:31

by the day.

138:32

It's already so low. Understanding is a

138:34

thing. Being able to being able Judgment

138:36

is the thing. Taste is a thing. Um, and

138:39

understanding, judgment, taste, these

138:41

come out of having real problems and

138:43

then solving them and then finding the

138:45

commonalities. What is philosophy?

138:47

Everyone, you live long enough, you'll

138:48

be a philosopher. Philosophy is just

138:50

when you find the hidden generalizable

138:53

truths among the specific experiences

138:55

that you've had in life

138:56

and then you know how to navigate future

138:58

specific experiences based on some

138:59

heristics and you create a philosophy

139:01

around that. Any subject pursued deeply

139:03

enough will eventually lead to

139:04

philosophy. Mastery in anything,

139:06

literally anything, will lead you to

139:08

being a philosopher. You just have to

139:09

stick with it long enough and generalize

139:11

the truths back out. And these are

139:12

universal truths. It's back to the unity

139:14

and variety. You can find you can find

139:17

unity in anything if you go deep enough.

139:19

And that's why the trit stuff

139:21

unfortunately sort of keeps coming back

139:23

around. You're like, well, look, this is

139:25

cliche for kind of a reason.

139:26

It's cliche for reasons. Uh but, you

139:29

know, sometimes you learn new things.

139:30

Sometimes you do figure out new things

139:32

too. Uh even even in philosophy for

139:34

example science has advanced as science

139:36

has advanced it's actually expanded our

139:39

boundaries of philosophy. Um when we

139:42

used to think that uh you know the earth

139:44

was the center of the universe you would

139:46

actually have a different philosophical

139:47

outlook than when you think the universe

139:50

is vast and we're infantestimally small.

139:53

It will give you a different

139:53

philosophical outlook. uh the same way

139:56

if you think that uh the nature is

140:00

driven by angels and demons and gods

140:02

versus if there are laws of physics that

140:04

are computable and understandable that

140:06

will lead you to a different

140:08

philosophical outlook.

140:09

Uh if you think that knowledge is

140:11

something that is passed down from above

140:13

and through generations versus something

140:15

that is created on the fly and then

140:17

tested against reality that will lead

140:19

you to a different philosophical

140:20

outlook. If you think humans are created

140:22

by God as opposed to humans evolved from

140:25

some, you know, unicellular organism,

140:28

yeah, it still doesn't solve the

140:29

original problem. Who created that? But

140:30

at least it takes you further down the

140:32

down the road.

140:32

Even sim theory is an attempt at

140:34

reformulating philosophy based on what

140:36

we know about computers, even though it

140:37

kind of leads to a lot of the same

140:38

conclusions as you know creator.

140:40

But it it it is at least philosophy that

140:43

is informed by technology and by

140:45

science. So philosophy can also invol

140:47

evolve moral philosophy evolves right uh

140:50

there was a time when every culture

140:52

practically that was a conquering

140:54

culture practice slavery now almost all

140:56

cultures abort slavery that's moral

140:58

philosophy having evolved

141:00

um you know there was even like this

141:03

sounds too ludicrous to be true and I

141:05

don't know if it fully is true but there

141:06

were a a fairly large group of doctors

141:08

based on studies who believed until the

141:10

1980s that babies couldn't feel pain and

141:13

so even to this day I think circumcision

141:14

is done without anesthesia and because

141:17

under the theory that you know very

141:18

young children babies don't feel pain

141:20

and that's ludicrous and there was a

141:21

study that came out in the 80s that said

141:22

no no no they do feel pain it's like oh

141:24

yeah of course right

141:25

so people can be stuck in bad

141:27

philosophical traps for a long period of

141:29

time so even philosophy can make

141:30

progress and uh as an example one of the

141:34

realizations that I had and this is

141:36

thanks to uh David Deutsch and my friend

141:38

James Pierce and also thinking it

141:40

through a little bit is that there are

141:42

these timeless old questions that we run

141:44

into where the answers seem like

141:47

paradoxes. So we stop thinking about

141:48

them. So an example is free will. Do you

141:50

have free will? Or does anything matter?

141:52

Is there a meaning to life? And

141:55

there and and we get stuck in them

141:57

because for example, is there a meaning

141:58

to life? Like yes, life has a meaning

142:00

because you're you're right here. You

142:01

create your own meaning. This this

142:03

moment has all the meaning you could

142:04

imagine. It's all the meaning there is.

142:06

On the other hand, you're going to die.

142:07

It all goes to zero. Heat. Death. The

142:08

universe has no meaning. Right? So which

142:10

one is it? Well,

142:11

the reason why it seems paradoxical is

142:13

because you're asking the question of a

142:16

human here and now at a certain scale

142:19

and a certain time and then you're

142:21

answering it from the viewpoint of the

142:22

universe over infinite time. So, you

142:24

pull the trick. You switch the level at

142:27

which you're answering the question. And

142:29

questions should be answered at the

142:30

level at which they're asked. So, if you

142:33

ask the question, is there meaning? You,

142:35

Chris, are asking that question. Yes.

142:37

Yes. To Chris, there is meaning. There's

142:39

meaning right here. This is the meaning.

142:40

you can interpret any meaning you want

142:41

onto it. Um, don't ask the question as

142:44

Chris and then answer it as God or as

142:46

the universe. That's the trick that

142:47

you're playing. That's why it seems

142:49

paradoxical. The same way you can say,

142:51

do I have free will? People debate free

142:52

will all day long. This the question is

142:56

answered at the wrong frame. So they ask

142:57

the question is do I as an individual

142:59

have free will? Hell yeah, I have free

143:01

will. My mind body system can't predict

143:03

what I'm going to do next. The universe

143:04

is infinitely complex. I'm making a

143:06

choice in my mind and I'm doing

143:07

something. There's my free will. So

143:09

answer at the level at which you were

143:10

asked. Of course I have free will

143:11

because I feel like I have free will and

143:13

I treat you like you have free will and

143:14

you treat me like I have free will. We

143:16

have free will. The problem then is you

143:18

start trying to answer the question as

143:19

if you're the universe. You're like well

143:21

on the universal scale big bang particle

143:23

collisions. No one makes any choices.

143:25

You know how could you be any different

143:26

than the what the universe wants you to

143:27

be and it's all one block universe. So

143:29

you don't have free will.

143:30

Don't answer the question at the level

143:32

at which it wasn't asked. So if God

143:34

asked the question is there free will?

143:36

No there is no free will. the universe

143:38

asks a question, there is no free will.

143:39

But if an individual asks a question

143:41

right now, then yes, there is free will.

143:43

So a lot of these paradoxes resolve

143:45

themselves, philosophical paradoxes that

143:47

people have been struggling with since

143:48

the beginning of time when you just

143:50

realize there you're you're answering

143:51

them at a scale and time different than

143:53

they were asked.

143:54

Speaking of updating beliefs, is there

143:56

anything that you've changed your mind

143:57

around recently?

144:00

Very recently. I mean, all the time. Uh,

144:02

but are you talking about like

144:03

philosophical existential things or like

144:05

technological things? Yeah,

144:06

philosophical existential things or

144:08

anything that comes to mind. If there's

144:09

anything that's front of mind where you

144:10

go, ah, yeah, that's a pretty big OS

144:12

update.

144:12

Yeah, I'm less lazy fair than I used to

144:14

be on a societal level. I think that

144:16

culture and religion are good

144:17

cooperating systems for humans. And so

144:20

if you want to operate in a high trust

144:21

society, you need to have sets of rules

144:23

that people need to follow and obey so

144:24

they get along even if they're, you

144:26

know, one sizefits-all doesn't work for

144:27

everybody.

144:27

Moved up a little bit from libertarian.

144:30

Yeah. I think pure libertarians get out

144:32

competed and die, right? They get

144:34

overrun because they're every man for

144:36

himself.

144:36

They can't coordinate.

144:37

They can't coordinate. Exactly. Right.

144:39

Um so the coordination problems, right?

144:42

Culture exists to solve fundamental

144:44

coordination problems. Religion solves

144:45

coordination problems. Ethnicity solves

144:48

coordination problems historically.

144:50

Um and when you uh break down those

144:52

coordination systems too fast and don't

144:54

replace them with anything else, you get

144:55

societal breakdown. So you can have very

144:57

malfunctioning societies. you know, go

144:59

to Japan versus go to any western city

145:01

and you can see the difference being a a

145:03

culture that's working and a culture

145:04

that's not.

145:05

Um, so I I think that that's like a a

145:09

broader set of things that I've changed

145:11

my mind on

145:12

uh a fair bit. I used to be much more

145:13

lazy fair on that stuff, let's put it

145:15

that way.

145:16

Mhm.

145:16

Um, what else? I mean, on child raising,

145:18

I've gotten a lot looser. You know, I'm

145:20

still not like completely less afair,

145:22

but I'm much more realized like kids are

145:24

going to be kids and you kind of let

145:25

them do their thing.

145:26

The debate with them. Is it a Talib that

145:28

has the ascending levels of like

145:31

anarchism versus conservatism? Is that

145:33

his insight? Like at the local level,

145:35

I'm this. It seems like you've gone the

145:36

other way. It's like at the child level

145:38

I'm an anarchist and at the societal

145:41

level I'm a conservative. No, he he was

145:43

quoting somebody else, some brothers, I

145:45

forget which ones, but he was making the

145:46

point eloquently as he often does. Uh

145:48

that

145:50

uh at you know at at at the family local

145:52

level he's a communist. At the family

145:54

level you're communist. uh at maybe the

145:57

the extended family level you're a

145:59

socialist at the local level, you know,

146:01

you're kind of a uh a democrat and so on

146:04

until at the federal level you're a

146:05

libertarian, right? So,

146:06

you've done it the other way. You're

146:07

being a libertarian with the kids and

146:09

you're being a religious conservative

146:11

and societal.

146:12

No, that's that's that's a that's a

146:13

funny way of looking at it. I I don't

146:14

know if the scale is that

146:17

that simple. Um what else have I changed

146:19

my mind on? I mean, I think a modern AI

146:22

is really cool. I think it's but I think

146:23

these are natural language computers. Um

146:26

they're starting to show evidence of

146:28

kind of uh reasoning at some levels but

146:31

I don't think they do creativity. I

146:33

think modern AI

146:35

one of so just on that one of my

146:36

favorite takes is from Dwash Patel and

146:38

he says um

146:40

uh if you gave any human on the planet

146:44

0.0 0 0 0.1% of the consumption that a

146:49

LLM has. Any LLM, they would have come

146:51

up with thousands of new ideas,

146:54

right?

146:54

Give me one new idea, one fundamental

146:57

new idea that's been generated.

146:58

Yeah. Like I'm big into poetry. Every

147:00

poem ever written by an LLM is garbage.

147:02

I think even their fiction writing is

147:03

terrible. Even the new GPT45, with all

147:05

due respect to Sam and Crew, uh I I

147:07

think they're terrible, terrible

147:08

writers. I find them really bad at

147:10

summarizing. They're really good at

147:11

extrapolating, you know, paperwork. um

147:14

they're very bad at actually distilling

147:15

the essence of something and what's

147:17

important. They don't have an opinions

147:18

or a point of view. But they're still

147:20

unbelievably powerful breakthroughs.

147:22

They solve search. They solve natural

147:24

language computing. They make English a

147:25

programming language. They solve

147:27

driving. They solve uh simple coding and

147:30

backup coding. They solve translation.

147:32

They solve transcription. Um they are a

147:34

fundamental breakthrough in computing.

147:36

It is a different way to program a

147:37

computer. rather than you explicitly

147:39

speak its language and write the code

147:41

and then run the data through it. You

147:42

just run enough data through it until it

147:44

figures out how to write the program.

147:45

That's huge. Um but are they are they

147:49

AGI? Not yet. And I don't see a direct

147:52

path from here to there. Um maybe we'll

147:54

have to solve a few more problems before

147:56

that happens. And I think ASI is a

147:58

fantasy. I don't think there's any such

147:59

thing as uh artificial super

148:01

intelligence where it has some kind of

148:03

intelligence that humans can't fathom.

148:05

Okay. Uh yeah, it seems like I don't

148:08

know if you're from the boss room camp

148:11

or whatever in

148:12

No, I'm not an AI doomer. I think that's

148:14

such a flawed line of reasoning. But

148:15

let's say that you know you came out of

148:17

the less wrong.com like slate style

148:19

codec world and

148:22

there was this sort of lineage from

148:24

computers and AI gets more powerful more

148:26

powerful more powerful and then you end

148:27

up AGI ASIS

148:29

and it seems like LLMs have been this

148:32

sort of orthogonal move from that which

148:35

are you saying you don't believe they

148:37

are a step on that it's kind of a little

148:39

bit of a traditional branch

148:41

I think Steven Wolf puts it better it's

148:42

a different form of intelligence it's

148:44

like if you see Jaguar in the jungle, it

148:46

has a different form of intelligence in

148:47

your like a plant has a form of

148:48

intelligence how it can like

148:49

photosynthesize and grow. It's a

148:51

different form of intelligence. It's not

148:53

and intelligence again like love or like

148:55

happiness is this overloaded word that

148:57

means many things to many people.

148:58

But by my definition where you know the

149:01

true test is you get what you want out

149:02

of life. It doesn't even have a life. It

149:03

doesn't even want anything. It's a

149:05

different thing.

149:06

Um I do think it's unbelievably useful.

149:09

I'm glad that it exists. You don't see

149:11

it much yet in large scale production

149:14

systems replacing humans because this

149:15

tendency to hallucinate. So you can't

149:17

put it into anything mission critical

149:18

confidently wrong one time out of 10.

149:20

Correct. And it doesn't even know when

149:21

it's wrong. Uh and maybe they'll get

149:23

that one out of 10 down to one out of

149:24

100. But you'll kind of always want

149:26

human oversight for critical critical

149:28

things.

149:29

I I always feel so bitter. It's I'm

149:32

petty sometimes. My my less economist

149:34

version of me is petty and I always want

149:36

to like teach it a lesson if it gets

149:39

something wrong. like how the [ __ ] like

149:41

no you were so confident I'm treating it

149:43

but I'm anthropomorizing anthropology

149:45

it doesn't have a point of view and they

149:46

are going to get a lot better and they

149:48

might get to the point where the error

149:49

rates are so low that you can put them

149:51

into certain bounded problems like

149:52

self-driving I think will be solved

149:54

completely uh because it's a bounded

149:56

problem cars don't you know go like

149:58

off-road and drive through houses and

149:59

stuff like that right so because and and

150:02

same way like certain kinds of coding

150:04

the creative side of coding I think

150:05

doesn't go away I think if anything

150:07

programmers get even more leverage and

150:09

more powerful And rather than computing

150:11

replacing programmers, programmers use

150:13

AI to replace everybody else.

150:14

On Tesla versus Whimo, would you bet on

150:17

software or hardware for self-driving?

150:19

Yeah. So the I think Tesla's in the

150:21

stronger, longer term position, but it's

150:24

hard to argue with what's working right

150:25

now. And Whimo is working right now. So

150:27

I would not underestimate them because

150:28

there's a learning curve that you go

150:30

through when you actually deploy

150:31

something. And Whimo is way ahead in

150:33

that regard. But Tesla's camera only

150:35

approach if it works uh is a superior.

150:38

It's much more scalable and Tesla knows

150:40

how to print cars, right? They can just

150:41

mass manufacture cars. But I think I

150:43

think they'll both be around. They'll

150:45

both be fine. It's everybody else who

150:47

doesn't have a self-driving vehicle

150:48

that's screwed.

150:50

You mentioned uh kids there and you had

150:53

a tweet that said, "I'm not convinced

150:55

that declining fertility needs to be

150:56

proactively fought."

150:59

I forgot that one.

151:00

You're going to have to I'm I dug deep.

151:01

Um why? Well, I mean, think back like

151:04

what was it 30 years ago, 20 years ago?

151:06

Everybody was saying overpopulation of

151:07

the earth is going to be a problem.

151:08

Malthusian ending, we're going to have

151:10

too many people. And now all of a sudden

151:11

we're going to have too few people. So

151:13

part of it is just the doomerism meme is

151:15

always alive and well, right? Or it just

151:16

gets repackaged.

151:17

Yeah. We're running out of oil. We have

151:18

too much oil, right? You know, it's like

151:20

the world is cooling, the world is

151:22

warming. Like there's always something

151:23

to scream about. The world is ending. Uh

151:25

there's no progress in technology. AI is

151:27

going to blow up the world, right? So

151:29

people tend to overdo in both

151:30

directions. Now, what is the actual

151:32

fertility problem, right? Well, people

151:34

are having less kids. Are they having

151:36

less kids because there's a disease? Was

151:37

there a virus? Did they lose their

151:39

fertility? The microplastics in the

151:40

testicles, right? No, it's people are

151:43

having less kids because they're

151:44

choosing to have less kids, right? Women

151:46

have gotten emancipation, independence

151:48

in the workforce, and they're making

151:49

more money. Um, people don't need kids

151:51

as insurance policies. They have less

151:53

kids. Maybe they're living hedonistic

151:54

lives. God bless them, right? They want

151:56

to have more fun. They want to have less

151:57

kids. I don't see the act of choosing to

151:59

have less kids as a problem. Okay, so

152:01

let's move one level up. Uh it's because

152:04

of retirees. It's because a large

152:06

percentage of the population is

152:08

essentially retiring at the guaranteed

152:10

age of 65 or 70 thanks social security.

152:13

And so they need other people to pay for

152:14

it. They need more workers in the

152:16

workforce. And if the workforce is

152:17

shrinking, then you have a small number

152:19

of people Exactly. who are supporting a

152:21

large number of retirees. And in

152:22

democracies, you can't take pensions

152:24

away. The voters vote you out. So they

152:26

slowly strangle the economy. So what do

152:28

you do? Then you have a bunch of

152:29

immigration and then the whole culture

152:30

changes. You end up in a low trust

152:32

society and people start fighting over

152:34

limited resources and how do you control

152:35

which immigrants come in and how do you

152:37

make sure that they're good taxpayers

152:38

after they're in and so on.

152:39

So you end up with in in kind of this

152:41

trap where the low fertility rate is

152:44

upstream of the downstream problems that

152:46

are cultural and societal.

152:49

But I'm not sure that you're going to

152:51

solve that by making people have more

152:53

kids. How are you going to meme them

152:54

into having more kids? And I'm not even

152:56

sure it's necessarily a problem because

152:57

keep in mind, you have more resources

152:59

now. You have less of a burden. Now,

153:01

there's there's a flip side where every

153:03

kid is a lottery ticket and an

153:04

invention. So, there's some benefit to

153:06

having more kids, but you can't you

153:08

can't force it.

153:09

I think it'll work itself out, right?

153:12

The Scott Adams has this great law which

153:14

calls the Adams law of slowmoving

153:16

disasters. When disasters are very slowm

153:19

moving like peak oil or global warming

153:22

or population collapse and everyone can

153:25

kind of see them coming economics and

153:28

society as a force solve them because

153:30

enough individual people has incentives

153:32

to go solve them.

153:33

So I don't know exactly how it gets

153:35

solved but I think it could get solved

153:37

in various ways. Uh, one example could

153:40

be um, you know, maybe people retire

153:43

later. Maybe AI and automation and

153:46

robots take care of the older people.

153:48

Maybe we figure out how to have

153:49

immigrants while still keeping a high

153:51

trust society. We kind of put more rules

153:53

around immigration that protect some of

153:55

the high trust benefits. Maybe we

153:57

outsource more things. Maybe we just,

153:58

you know, have more land and housing to

154:01

go around. Believe me, if we were having

154:02

too many kids, everybody complain about

154:04

how there's no housing and there's no

154:05

land, right? So they'll always find

154:07

something to care about. So, I just

154:08

don't view this as like a thing that any

154:11

individual or government action is going

154:13

to solve. I think economics and

154:14

incentives over time will solve it. And

154:16

I'm not even convinced it's like that

154:18

big of a problem.

154:19

Is there anything that you do think is a

154:22

it may be selfcorrecting too, which is

154:23

that if there are too few kids in

154:25

society and the returns to having kids

154:27

literally might just go up. It might

154:28

just be easier to have

154:29

the incentive to now have a child

154:30

because there's so few around, they're

154:32

going to get the best job. They're going

154:33

to have opportunity resources. It's like

154:35

everyone wants to everyone's

154:36

I suppose if you could come at it from a

154:38

pain side which is you look at all of

154:39

the other people around who don't have

154:41

kids. Let's say that um pensions

154:44

completely drop off and the only way

154:45

that old people are able to survive is

154:47

if their children pay them some sort of

154:48

stipend like reverse you know send send

154:50

money back up the generations. You go

154:52

okay well that's a pretty [ __ ] good

154:53

incentive.

154:54

That's a good incentive. I also think

154:55

that people have been me'd into thinking

154:57

that uh kids make your life worse and

154:59

that's a that's a pretty pretty bad

155:01

what's your experience been? Kids make

155:03

your life better in every possible way.

155:04

If you want to if you want an automatic

155:06

built-in meaning to life, have kids. Uh,

155:08

and I think there are these bad psych

155:11

studies, like most psych studies,

155:12

unfortunately, that say that people are

155:14

unhappy when they have kids. Yeah, it's

155:16

because you're catching in the middle of

155:17

changing a diaper and you're saying

155:18

like, "Are you glad you had kids or

155:20

not?" Or or they don't even say that.

155:21

They say, "Are you happy or not?" And

155:22

they say, "No, I'm not happy right now."

155:24

But what they don't realize is that

155:25

person has found something more

155:26

important than being happy in the

155:28

moment. They found meaning. And the

155:29

meaning comes from kids. And if you ask

155:30

parents, do you regret having kids? I

155:32

think it would be 99 to1 against, you

155:34

know, it would be, "No, I don't regret

155:36

having kids. I love having kids. I'm so

155:38

glad I had kids." It's it's incredibly

155:40

rare to meet a parent that regretted

155:41

having children.

155:42

It's pretty good odds.

155:43

It's it's extremely good odds. And I

155:45

think so I think I think a lot of people

155:48

get late into life and uh you know, then

155:51

they can't admit that they didn't want

155:52

kids that that that they should have had

155:53

kids. It's kind of late in the game. Um,

155:56

but you know, a lot of times you see

155:58

everybody who has a pet, right? Uh, and

156:00

they're pushing them around in a

156:02

stroller, right? What is that? That's a

156:04

sublimated desire for children.

156:05

Yeah. Uh, Malcolm Collins says that uh,

156:08

having a pet is to children is using

156:10

porn is to sex. He basically thinks that

156:12

it's sort of a surrogate.

156:14

It It's definitely in that direction.

156:16

And, you know,

156:18

I like pets. I like animals. I don't but

156:20

I don't like the idea of like neutering

156:22

or spaying something and then keeping it

156:23

as a prisoner in the house and having to

156:25

train it. You know, it's just I don't

156:27

want to be responsible for that.

156:28

Given that you've been thinking more

156:30

about child rearing kids, what do you

156:33

hope that your kids learn from their

156:35

childhood?

156:37

They should just be happy and do what

156:38

they want. I don't I don't I don't have

156:40

particular goals in mind for them. I

156:42

think that's a that's another route to

156:43

unhappiness. Having

156:44

That's different though, right? Than

156:45

learn versus goals. It's not necessarily

156:47

what do they want? What what do you want

156:48

them to want out of life? Like what is

156:51

it that you had that idea around your

156:55

number one job as a parent is to provide

156:56

unconditional love to your kids.

156:57

Yeah, that's it.

156:58

Right. So I can be loved or I am loved

157:01

unconditionally. Is that one of the

157:02

things?

157:02

I want my kids to feel unconditionally

157:04

loved and I want them to have high

157:05

self-esteem.

157:07

Mhm.

157:08

As a consequence of that,

157:10

but I don't get to choose any All I get

157:12

to choose is my output. I can output

157:14

love. I can't choose what they feel. I

157:16

can't choose how they behave. I can't

157:18

choose what they want. I can't choose

157:19

what they turn out to be.

157:21

And downstream from that, there should

157:23

be freedom. There should be a degree of

157:24

freedom that comes from the self-esteem

157:26

that comes from the unconditionality.

157:28

They should make their own mistakes and

157:29

learn their own lessons and uh have

157:31

their own desires and fulfill them as is

157:33

appropriate. Uh I like any parent, I

157:36

wouldn't want them to be hurt. I

157:38

wouldn't want them to be unhappy. But I

157:39

cannot control these things.

157:41

Uh you replied to my friend Rob

157:43

Henderson. He was talking about um how

157:46

kids fall asleep more quickly when

157:47

they're being carried and uh you said

157:49

cry it out and co-sleeping is dangerous.

157:53

What's IYI science? IY is Nim TB. He

157:57

talk about intellectual yet idiot. These

157:59

are people who are overeducated and they

158:01

deny like basic common sense.

158:03

Okay.

158:04

Uh so there's a lot of that that goes on

158:05

in child rearing uh thanks to really bad

158:08

studies uh and and bad public medical

158:11

directives. So, for example, you know,

158:13

uh a few uh a few parents you maybe

158:16

they're drunk or they're high or they're

158:18

just other issues and you know, they

158:20

roll over their kid when they're

158:21

sleeping, the kid suffocates or they

158:23

neglect their kid and then

158:24

is that co-sleeping having them in the

158:26

bed.

158:26

Yeah. Exactly. Or or there, you know,

158:28

the the modern proclamation. And so,

158:30

because of that, they say, "Well, don't

158:31

co-sleep with your kids." Well, the kids

158:33

in every society through all of human

158:35

history co-slept with their parents.

158:37

Where else do you think they were

158:37

sleeping? They weren't houses in

158:39

multiple rooms. Yeah. Exactly. Put in

158:41

the other tent. We'll put It's just

158:43

nonsense. Co-sleeping has been around

158:45

since the dawn of time. So has uh

158:48

feeding kids cow milk when or goat milk

158:50

when breast milk is runs out or is not

158:52

available. Um yet we're told formula,

158:54

you know, made with soy and and and corn

158:57

syrup, which was invented recently, is

159:00

somehow better than uh cow milk. And cow

159:02

milk can be dangerous for your kids and

159:03

co-sleeping is dangerous for your kids

159:04

and cry it out is the right answer. All

159:06

of that is nonsense. I mean, it's very

159:08

clear that um we raise children

159:10

throughout human history without uh

159:12

these interventions. And and to me, the

159:15

idea that like you're going to let your

159:16

kid cry it out, I get why that's done

159:18

for practical reasons so that you know

159:20

you can get some sleep and you can go to

159:22

work in the morning, but the reality is

159:23

when you let the kid cry it out, you're

159:25

letting the kid ball until it finally

159:27

gives up. I mean, the kid left by itself

159:29

to cry it out in the wild. It's going to

159:31

get it's going to get eaten, right? It's

159:33

going to get eaten by a tiger. Um, so

159:35

this kid is starting off on the wrong

159:37

foundation. The the one I mentioned

159:39

earlier about the idea that babies don't

159:41

feel pain. Like that's ludicrous, right?

159:43

Um,

159:44

I've never heard that before. That's

159:45

such a wild idea.

159:46

Yeah, I'm not saying that's 100% true. I

159:48

read it on

159:49

the child in the cheek quite hard. And

159:50

that's an academy. I read it on Twitter

159:52

and I did one level confirmation on it,

159:54

but it's so ludicrous that I should

159:56

probably do two or three level

159:57

confirmations on it before I talk about

159:58

it.

159:59

Um, but there are definitely some people

160:01

who believe that there enough that it

160:03

was a thing. um in certain circles for a

160:05

while. But I think we just go through

160:07

these, you know, the these IYI beliefs,

160:10

these intellectual beliefs come from

160:12

people who uh take a little bit of

160:15

knowledge and extrapolate it too far.

160:16

They think we know more than we know due

160:19

to recent scientific studies and these

160:22

are junk science. These are low power

160:24

studies on uh you know on very certain

160:26

contexts that then get over applied.

160:28

Behavioral psych is very guilty of this

160:30

but it's true across a lot of science.

160:32

Um, so even with science, you have to be

160:34

skeptical. You have to look very

160:36

carefully at, you know, does it apply in

160:37

the right context or not? Is it come

160:39

from good sources? Did they run enough

160:40

high-powered studies widely accepted?

160:42

And there are a whole bunch of things

160:43

you're just not supposed to talk about.

160:44

You're not supposed to say like you

160:45

don't say like you you can you can't say

160:47

anything negative about vaccines because

160:49

god forbid what if they don't get the

160:50

polio vaccine, right? And that's part of

160:52

the reason why the recent vaccine debate

160:53

because we've taken our worship for

160:55

vaccines too far because we don't want

160:57

people to not take non-essential

160:59

vaccines. So it gets overdone. So the

161:00

same way there's this whole SIDS thing,

161:02

sudden infant death syndrome, right?

161:04

It's like no, there's kids don't

161:06

suddenly mysteriously die. Like more

161:09

likely there was neglect or there was a

161:10

problem and then whoever was the

161:12

caretaker doesn't want to admit to the

161:14

problem or didn't recognize the problem,

161:16

but kids don't just spontaneously die in

161:18

the crib, right? Um so they talk about

161:20

swaddling babies. You swaddle babies,

161:22

you know, basically tie them up, mummify

161:24

them. Uh so you constrict them so they

161:27

die of SIDS where they roll over and

161:28

they can't get back. I mean, it's just

161:30

all this craziness around fundraising.

161:32

It's a real minefield.

161:33

It's a minefield. And and and you know,

161:35

you have these scared parents or having

161:36

a kid for the first time and they open a

161:38

book and they start reading how to raise

161:39

children when I would argue that your

161:41

natural instincts on what to do with

161:43

your child

161:44

uh are actually pretty good. It It's

161:46

funny when uh my wife and I had our

161:48

first baby. I remember, you know, at the

161:50

hospital,

161:51

sorry, the first one was natural birth

161:53

um at the birthing center. We we went

161:55

home. I was like, "There you go. That's

161:56

it." And we're like, what do we do?

161:59

Where's the instruction manual? You take

162:01

them home

162:02

and then you relax and you realize

162:03

actually

162:05

instincts are pretty good. You know, if

162:06

the kid cries, check to see if they

162:08

clean, feed them, all that. It's like

162:10

your your basic instincts are actually

162:12

very very good. And kids instincts are

162:14

actually very very good. They know what

162:16

they want and they want things for a

162:17

reason

162:18

and they can encourage you to give it to

162:19

them.

162:20

Yes. It's usually it children are not

162:24

deficient adults who can't reason. Uh

162:27

and to some extent that's true but

162:30

mostly it's not true. Mostly they have

162:32

very good reasons for what they want and

162:35

you as a parent mostly have

162:37

communication problems with them. They

162:39

can't yet communicate to you. You can't

162:41

communicate to them. They can't

162:42

communicate to you. So early on with my

162:45

kids, I tried to focus on teaching them,

162:47

you know, basic explanatory theories as

162:50

opposed to having them memorize things.

162:53

That's just the most

162:55

the most nol solution.

162:57

I'll give you I'll give you a very

162:58

simple example,

162:59

right? Okay. So this is Twitter and this

163:01

is this is the how to get rich without

163:03

getting lucky thread. So the first one

163:05

well a simple one is you know how does

163:08

knowledge get created? If you follow the

163:09

critical rationalism David Deutsch

163:11

philosophy, then it's by guessing and

163:13

then by testing your guesses. So

163:15

whenever they ask me something like,

163:16

well, why do you think that is? Well,

163:17

how would we figure out if that's true?

163:19

Right? So that's a basic game you can

163:20

play

163:20

involving them.

163:21

Involving them. But another one is that

163:24

a lot of the rules that you teach kids

163:26

have to do with hygiene, right? You must

163:28

brush your teeth, you know, cover your

163:30

mouth when you cough. Um, you know,

163:32

clean up after yourself. Don't touch

163:34

that. Wash your hands after you do this.

163:36

um don't eat food off the floor, right?

163:39

But all of these are subsumed under the

163:41

germ theory of disease, right? So if you

163:43

instead go on YouTube and show them

163:45

videos of germs or if you have them look

163:47

under a microscope at anything, they're

163:49

like, "Ah, they can infer what's going

163:51

Yeah, there's creepy crawies everywhere

163:52

and I got to watch out for them." Uh and

163:55

then, you know, you can talk about how

163:57

if you look at humans, like our real

163:59

enemy are pathogens. I think a lot of

164:00

aging and disease are actually

164:02

downstream of our competition with

164:03

pathogens over time. uh to a point that

164:06

people still don't fully appreciate. Um

164:08

there's a red queen hypothesis which is

164:10

that we undergo sexual selection to mix

164:13

up our genes. And so every 20 years,

164:15

every generation, mix up your genes. But

164:17

if you look at how bacteria and viruses

164:18

mutate through just random mutations,

164:21

their mixup rate on their genes and

164:24

evolution rate is roughly the same as

164:26

ours. Even though they go through

164:27

thousands of generations those 20 years

164:28

because they're not doing sexual

164:29

selection, they're doing asexual

164:31

replication, mutation, their their

164:34

evolutionary rate is roughly equivalent

164:36

to ours. So we're in a red queen race

164:37

where we're both running at roughly the

164:39

same speed using very different

164:40

strategies.

164:42

But a lot of how we're involved is

164:45

around pathogens. Like our immune system

164:47

is one of the most expensive things to

164:48

run in the body is so much as about

164:50

immune system optimization. That's about

164:51

pathogens. junk DNA in bacteria and

164:54

crisper was discovered because in

164:55

bacteria their DNA is evolved to fight

164:59

viruses and the way it does that is by

165:01

taking viral DNA and snipping it up

165:03

every time there's a viral attack and

165:04

storing it in their own DNA so they have

165:05

a copy so they can recognize it next

165:08

time it attacks and you know and so on.

165:10

Um a lot of the population structure of

165:13

species uh determines how long their

165:16

lifespans are. So very uh so if if in a

165:21

given species there's a very high rate

165:23

of infection then you'll have these

165:25

older members of the population are

165:27

carrying diseases that will then infect

165:29

the young. So it's important for that

165:31

species to get rid of the old faster. So

165:33

the higher the disease rate in a given

165:35

population, the less long live the

165:37

entire population. So the older ones

165:38

don't infect the younger ones. That's a

165:40

hypothesis and I think it's true. It's

165:42

an interesting hypothesis. um uh

165:44

homeostasis within the human body, how

165:46

we're always returning to a given level

165:48

of things like that's a that's a

165:49

fundamental part of our makeup, our

165:51

temperature, pH, blood pressure, and so

165:52

on under homeostasis. But if you if you

165:56

engage in any kind of signaling like you

165:57

take a peptide for example, that's a

165:58

signaling molecule. You take a hormone

166:00

externally, the body will counteract it.

166:02

You take testosterone, the body will

166:03

counteract will downregulate its own

166:05

production very fast. Uh and the body

166:07

releases its own hormones in pulses

166:10

rather than steady state. Why is that?

166:11

Well, that's because uh bacteria and

166:14

viruses can infect your body and trick

166:16

your body. They can take it over. Like

166:18

toxoplasmosis does this, rabies does

166:20

this. They take over macroscopic

166:21

structure, structural bodies.

166:23

And small bacteria and viruses would

166:25

hack our bodies and literally take them

166:26

over if we didn't have defense

166:28

mechanisms. And one of those defense

166:30

mechanisms is homeostasis. Anytime you

166:32

see something getting out of whack, you

166:34

immediately push back really hard on it

166:35

because like, did I just get infected?

166:37

Is something trying to take me over?

166:38

It's also why hormones get released in

166:40

pulses at night rather than in steady

166:43

state low levels because uh enemy

166:45

bacteria can release toxins or the same

166:49

signaling molecules in small quantities

166:51

but they can't pulse. They can't

166:52

coordinate to pulse.

166:53

So your body can coordinate to pulse as

166:55

a macroscopic object but microscopic

166:57

objects can't coordinate to create the

166:58

same pulses.

166:59

Oh that's cool.

167:00

Yeah. So there's all I mean

167:01

so you know that it's coming from you.

167:02

Is that why?

167:03

Correct. It's endogenous rather than

167:04

exogenous.

167:05

So I never knew that. And that's why we

167:07

resist a lot of exogenous treatments. A

167:09

lot of our medical treatments don't

167:10

work. Um anyway, so this these are

167:14

there's there's a bunch more I could go

167:15

on, but I think that a lot of uh you

167:18

know, you see this in cancers where uh a

167:20

lot of uh bacteria show up like the

167:23

Epstein bar virus shows up in a lot of

167:24

cancers and um you know, now it seems

167:27

like the gut microbiome influences so

167:29

many things. Basically uh bacteria and

167:32

viruses are at the top of the food chain

167:34

compared to us. Like we are top of the

167:36

well-known food chain, but bacteria and

167:38

viruses eat us. Fungus eats us. So these

167:40

microscopic predators are our natural

167:43

predators. And so a lot of aging,

167:45

societal structure, hygiene, religious

167:48

strictctures against pork, you know,

167:51

circumcision, all of these things. These

167:52

are all designed to resist bacteria and

167:54

viruses. So if you can teach children

167:56

this philosophy at an early age, you

167:58

shortcut all the debates.

168:00

How effective have you been at teaching

168:01

that philosophy to children?

168:03

That one, I think I've been pretty

168:04

effective. I've drilled that one at

168:05

home. The one I haven't quite gotten

168:07

around to yet is evolution. Like I'm

168:09

starting to do little bits of that, you

168:10

know, like we came from monkeys. What

168:12

does that mean?

168:13

Um, already got them thinking about some

168:15

of the deeper questions. I did ask my,

168:17

you know, young son like uh, you know,

168:20

can nothing exist? I thought that was a

168:22

fun question. So, I like to throw a fun

168:23

question.

168:23

How old is he now? Like four, three.

168:24

No, no, he's he's eight.

168:26

Oh, right. An 8-year-old and a

168:27

six-year-old. So, I asked them both

168:28

like, "Can nothing exist?" And they had

168:29

pretty good answers, right? Um, another

168:32

one we played with the other day was

168:34

like, "What is the matrix?"

168:36

Okay. Uh, you know, what is what is

168:38

this? What is all this? Um, I just find

168:40

it and it's entertaining. It's just fun

168:42

to talk about, right? To talk about

168:43

these questions with your kids. I'm not

168:44

saying that one is a good way of child

168:46

raising. It's not leading to any deeper

168:48

learning other than maybe just have them

168:50

start uh or continue to question the

168:53

basic structure of reality and not move

168:55

past it so quickly. also to take joy.

168:57

You know what's the meta lesson that's

168:59

being taught there? Dad

169:02

dad spends time asking questions to

169:05

which there are not necessarily an

169:06

answer because there is something

169:08

enjoyable in the process of learning and

169:09

trying to decipher what's happening

169:11

possibly. Also, dad tries not too hard

169:13

to teach people things. I don't want to

169:15

be I don't want to be didactic.

169:17

He helps them to arrive at it.

169:18

Yeah. Correct. Correct. Dad Dad is here

169:20

to help you solve problems when you have

169:21

problems and you constantly have

169:23

problems. So if you come to dad, dad can

169:25

help explain to you how he would solve

169:27

the problem. But most of the time they

169:28

don't want that. Most of the time they

169:29

just want most of the time they just

169:30

want me to solve the problem, right? So

169:32

sometimes they have to play it dumb.

169:34

It's like why is my Wi-Fi not working on

169:35

my computer? I'm like I don't know. Did

169:36

you click on that thing?

169:38

Look, you've got like a rebellious

169:39

sovereign child. Sovereign as they may

169:40

be, but sometimes they still need the

169:43

dad to step in.

169:44

So in addition to feeling loved and

169:45

having high self-esteem, I think the

169:47

most important trait that would be nice

169:49

to not rob them of is agency. I want

169:53

them to preserve their agency. They're

169:55

born naturally agentic and willful, but

169:58

a lot of child raising can beat that out

170:00

of them by essentially domesticating

170:02

them. That's right.

170:03

And I would rather have wild animals and

170:04

wolves than have well-trained dogs

170:07

because I'm not going to be around to

170:08

take care of them.

170:09

Yeah. So, they're going to have to be

170:10

able to look after themselves.

170:11

Exactly. Yeah. A friend of mine, uh,

170:13

Parsa on, uh, on Air Chat, uh, he had a

170:16

great saying. He said, uh, he wants his,

170:18

uh, children to be quick to learn and

170:20

hard to kill.

170:22

[Laughter]

170:23

thought that was pretty good.

170:24

Yeah,

170:25

that was cool. I remember you saying

170:27

just thinking about sort of future and

170:29

culture and stuff like that. I remember

170:31

you saying that the left had won the

170:32

culture war and now they're just driving

170:34

around shooting the survivors,

170:35

right?

170:36

After the last 6 months of change that

170:38

we've seen and sort of where we're at at

170:40

the moment, what do you think the future

170:42

of the culture war looks like?

170:44

It's not over yet. Um, they definitely

170:47

won earlier rounds. They took over

170:48

institutions. I think now it's much more

170:50

of a fair fight. Um where you have

170:53

people like Elon, you know, kind of

170:55

supporting uh so so there there's these

170:59

different forces through history, right?

171:01

Historians will argue about this. Uh but

171:03

there's a theory of the great man of

171:05

history thing where it's like oh you

171:06

have the Einsteins, you have the Teslas,

171:08

you have the um the Jangaskhans and the

171:11

Caesars, right? They determine the flow

171:13

of history. And then there's the other

171:15

uh point of view that no there are these

171:17

massive forces at play you know

171:19

demographics and geography and so on and

171:21

then the particular great man doesn't

171:23

matter they just come and go Napoleon

171:24

doesn't matter they would have been

171:25

somebody else uh the specific names are

171:27

not important and because of kind of the

171:29

leftist turn that our institutions took

171:31

in the last few uh decades they now only

171:34

subscribe to the great forces theory of

171:36

history not the great man theory of

171:37

history but I think now we're seeing the

171:38

two play out where you're seeing you

171:41

know Trump and Elon and other

171:42

individuals is rising up and saying no,

171:44

we resist.

171:45

Yeah, that's interesting.

171:45

And um I think that unfortunately

171:50

and so the battle between kind of these

171:51

these these collectivists and great

171:53

forces versus individuals, it's as old

171:55

as humanity itself. And and it is

171:57

fundamental to the species. We are not a

172:00

completely individualistic species. You

172:02

know, no man is an island. A single

172:03

person can't do anything by themselves.

172:05

But we're also not a Borg. We're not a

172:08

beehive. We're not an ant colony. We're

172:10

not all just drones marching along. So,

172:12

which is it? We we're somewhere in the

172:14

middle. And the human race is always

172:16

kind of bouncing between the two. We

172:18

like strong leaders. We like to be led.

172:20

Um we like to coordinate our forces and

172:22

and and mass and and do things. Uh but

172:25

at the same time, we're also all

172:26

individuals and willing to break away

172:28

and willing to do our own thing and

172:29

everyone's always fighting to be a

172:30

leader and there's always status games

172:32

going on. So, u we're there's a pendulum

172:35

that's always swinging back and forth.

172:37

And in modern economics, the way that

172:39

manifests is between sort of Marxism and

172:41

capitalism, right? Marxism is like from

172:43

each according to his ability to each

172:45

according to his needs. We're all equal.

172:47

There's a millennial project. We're all

172:48

going to be equal in the end. And and

172:50

you know, don't try and stand out, but

172:52

do what's good for everybody. Um, and

172:54

there's a religious aspect to it. And

172:55

then the the capitalist individualist is

172:58

like libertarian. Every man for himself.

172:59

You just each do what you want and it'll

173:01

work out for the greater good. That's

173:02

Adam Smith. You know, the invisible hand

173:04

of the market will feed you. the baker

173:05

should bake and the butcher should

173:06

butcher and the candlestick maker should

173:08

make candlesticks and it'll all work

173:09

out. Each person does their best and

173:11

they trade and so which is it which

173:12

which which theory is correct and I

173:15

think there's always going to be a

173:16

battle between the two and

173:19

I think

173:22

the interesting thing is what's going on

173:24

there's a modern flavor to it which

173:26

changes it. The modern flavor is that

173:30

the individual is getting more powerful

173:32

because they're becoming more leverage.

173:34

So someone like an Elon Musk can have

173:36

the leverage of tens of thousands of

173:38

brilliant engineers and producers

173:40

working for him. He can have factories

173:42

of robots manufacturing things. He can

173:44

have hundreds of billions of dollars of

173:45

capital behind him and he can project

173:47

himself through media to hundreds of

173:49

millions of people. That is more power

173:51

than any individual could have had

173:52

historically. So the great men of

173:54

history are becoming greater.

173:56

That said, that same leverage is

173:59

increasing the gap between the halves

174:01

and have nots. So in the wealth game,

174:03

more people are winning overall and the

174:05

average is going up. But in the status

174:06

game, there are essentially more losers.

174:08

There are more invisible men and women

174:10

who are getting nothing out of life and

174:12

have no leverage. Relatively speaking.

174:14

Objectively speaking, they might be

174:16

better off. They still have phones and

174:17

they still have TVs and they're not

174:19

absolutist creatures though. We're

174:20

relative creatures.

174:21

Correct. And so to the extent that we're

174:22

relatives creatures, there are more

174:23

losers than winners. And in a democracy,

174:26

those people will outnumber the winners

174:29

and they will vote the winners down.

174:31

Yep. Um, and so that's the battle that

174:33

kind of goes on and the democracy has

174:35

gotten very broad. And so one of my

174:36

other quips is that um it's not the

174:40

right to vote that gives you power, it's

174:42

power that gives you the right to vote.

174:44

So we've confused the two. So what

174:47

happened was, you know, voting started

174:49

as a way for people who had power to

174:51

divide up the power, not fight amongst

174:53

themselves. The winners of the

174:54

revolution, the winners of the war, the

174:56

people in the House of Lords and the

174:58

House of Commons, they divide up power

174:59

amongst themselves. to say, "Hey, we

175:01

have all the money. We have the power.

175:03

We are the knights. We have the swords.

175:04

We have the warriors. We could kill

175:06

everybody, but we don't want to just

175:07

fight each other all day long. We don't

175:08

have to be Game of Thrones forever. So,

175:10

we're going to divide up power by voting

175:11

among ourselves." But then, as society

175:14

goes on and becomes more and more

175:15

peaceful, that franchise for voting gets

175:17

spread. It gets spread to people who

175:19

don't have land, who don't have power,

175:21

who may not be able to inflict physical

175:23

violence. And then eventually, you get

175:24

to the point where everybody's voting.

175:26

Everybody's voting. and everybody was

175:27

voting for candy and fairies and you

175:29

know all the free things in life.

175:31

Uh and then eventually people start

175:33

voting to oppress each other. The 51% in

175:36

in any domain vote to oppress the 49s,

175:39

the tyranny, the majority. But not all

175:41

of them are willing to back that up with

175:43

physical power. And so you can end up in

175:45

a situation where people who don't have

175:47

physical power are using the

175:49

institutions of the state to control the

175:51

people who do have physical power. as a

175:53

simple example taking the United States

175:55

the people who don't have guns voting to

175:57

disarm the people that do have guns

175:59

right well if the people who do have

176:00

guns get coordinated and care enough you

176:02

can't do that right so I think

176:04

eventually these societal structures are

176:06

unstable they break down and they break

176:08

down because eventually the people who

176:10

have the power and say no wait a minute

176:12

you don't get to vote you you only got

176:14

to vote because you had power and now

176:15

you don't have power and you're somehow

176:17

trying to vote

176:18

all of nature all of society all of

176:20

capitalism all of human endeavors are

176:23

underpinned by physical violence. And

176:25

that is very hard truth to swallow and

176:27

hard to get away from. Nature is read in

176:29

tooth and claw. If you don't fight, you

176:31

don't survive. You don't live, you die.

176:33

And that's true of everything alive

176:35

today.

176:36

And humans are no different. So giving

176:38

up physical power and then thinking you

176:40

can exercise political power fails.

176:41

Which is why every communist revolution,

176:44

which is all about equality and kumbaya

176:46

and brothers and sisters, end up being

176:47

run by a bunch of thugs. Because if you

176:49

don't have a way to divide up the wealth

176:51

based on merit, then it's always going

176:53

to be based on power and influence. The

176:54

thugs with the guns always win in the

176:56

end. So the question is just can you

176:58

keep the thugs and the with the guns

177:01

paid and happy and successful society

177:03

where you're allocating based on merit

177:05

because if you can't then you do it

177:06

based on power. So I do think that this

177:09

battle is not over but that's because it

177:10

it never stopped. It's always been there

177:12

from day one. It will continue. Is it a

177:14

battle to not care about the news in an

177:17

age of news saturation? All of this

177:19

stuff, headlines 24 hours a day,

177:21

streamed directly into your

177:22

consciousness through a device in your

177:23

pocket. You know, a lot of what we've

177:25

spoken about today is freedom. Freedom

177:28

from having to think about things or

177:29

care about things that you do not have

177:31

control over or that you shouldn't or

177:32

that you don't want to. And yet people

177:34

are just like submerged up to the bottom

177:37

of their nostrils basically drowning in

177:40

worry. So how Yeah. Is it is it a battle

177:44

to sort of stay out of the news when

177:45

you're saturated in it?

177:46

Yeah. I mean, as you're saying, the

177:47

human brain has not evolved to handle

177:50

all the world's emergencies breaking in

177:52

real time and you can't care about

177:53

everything and you'll go insane if you

177:55

try. Um, doesn't mean you shouldn't care

177:57

at all. There's no should. I mean, if

177:59

you want to care, go ahead and care. I

178:01

would just say that you're probably

178:02

better off only caring about things that

178:04

are local or things that you can affect.

178:06

So, if you really care about something

178:07

that's in the news, then by all means

178:09

care about it, but make a difference. Go

178:11

do something about it. uh and make sure

178:13

that it's your overwhelming desire and

178:15

you don't have five other desires at the

178:17

same time. Um also just realize the

178:19

consequences of it. You're going to be

178:20

unhappy until that thing gets fixed and

178:22

that thing will often be out of your

178:24

control.

178:25

Desire is a contract to be unhappy until

178:27

you get what you want. But exactly for

178:29

the most part that's something that is

178:30

in your life. It's like till I lose the

178:32

weight until I get the job.

178:34

Outside too. Yeah. If it's until the

178:37

carbon dioxide parts per million are

178:39

below this particular number. It's like

178:40

that's a that's a tough one. Or all the

178:42

people with Trump derangement syndrome,

178:44

right? He's living rentree in their

178:45

heads and driving them insane. And I get

178:47

it. I mean, there are politicians who

178:48

have definitely driven me insane as

178:50

well. Um, but it comes at a very high

178:52

cost and is something that is out of

178:54

your control that you cannot really

178:55

influence.

178:56

Um, so it's probably good to at least be

178:59

conscious of it.

179:01

You mentioned uh historians before. One

179:04

of my friends has a a question, his

179:06

equivalent of uh Peter Thiel's question

179:09

of uh what is it that you believe that

179:10

most people would disagree with? His is

179:13

what do you think is currently ignored

179:14

by the media but will be studied by

179:16

historians?

179:20

You're asking me that question right

179:21

now. What do I think is ignored by the

179:23

media but will be studied by historians?

179:26

Well, I mean

179:28

the media is only focused on

179:33

very timely things, right? So, it

179:36

depends if you want to talk about timely

179:37

or timeless, right?

179:39

But as a as a simple example, if I just

179:41

look at things that maybe the next five

179:43

or 10 years that are going to make a

179:45

massive difference that people are not

179:47

focused enough on.

179:49

Um, and I think within two years this

179:51

will be obvious. So, like they make a

179:53

prediction and predictions are tough,

179:55

but and I have to eat it in a few years.

179:56

Yeah, I'm going have to eat eat this in

179:57

a few years. So, I'm probably wrong, but

179:59

uh two things that I pay attention to um

180:02

that I don't think uh a lot of people do

180:03

pay attention to. Well, there's a

180:05

couple. One is I think just how bad

180:07

modern medicine is. I think people just

180:09

put a lot more faith in modern medicine

180:11

than is warranted. Like our best ideas

180:13

for a lot of things are surgery, just

180:15

cutting things out, right? Uh treating

180:17

things that are extraneous like, oh, you

180:19

don't really need a gallbladder, you

180:20

don't really need an appendix or you

180:21

don't really need tonsils. Oh, that's

180:22

false. every the surplus requirement.

180:25

Human body is very very efficient. All

180:26

those things are needed. Um you know so

180:29

I think I think the state of modern

180:30

medicine is still pretty bad. We don't

180:31

have many good explanatory theories in

180:33

biology. Um we have germ theory disease.

180:36

We have um evolution, we have uh cell

180:40

theory, we have DNA genetics, um

180:43

morphogenesis, embryogenesis and not

180:45

much else. You know there's not much

180:47

else. Everything else is rules of thumb

180:48

memorization. A affects B because

180:51

affects C affects D but we don't

180:52

understand the underlying explanation.

180:54

It's all just words pointing to words

180:56

pointing to words. So biology is still

180:58

in a very sorry state and because we are

181:00

not allowed to take risk that might kill

181:02

people. Um we just don't experiment

181:05

enough in biology. So a lot of

181:06

treatments are just outright banned by

181:08

large regulatory bodies. So we just

181:10

don't have the innovation. So I think

181:12

we're still in the stone age when it

181:13

comes to biology and we got a long ways

181:15

to go. Uh, and I think people will look

181:17

back agast at this. And I think this is

181:18

Brian Johnson's point. He's like, you

181:20

know, let's be more more extreme. Let's

181:22

try to live forever. We must be more

181:24

experimental. And I'll start as end of

181:25

one and start experimenting on myself.

181:27

And

181:28

um, but even there, I disagree with

181:30

Brian in many things like, you know,

181:31

taking huge amounts of supplements. I

181:32

think we just don't know supplements

181:34

outside of their natural context like

181:35

just eat liver, man. Right. Um, but

181:38

that's fine. And and I wouldn't be vegan

181:40

either, but you know, it's it's I I

181:41

really appreciate that he's

181:42

experimenting. He's good naturatured

181:44

about he shares everything. So we need

181:46

more people like that.

181:47

Um so I think the state of biology

181:49

people will look back and say wow that

181:51

was in the dark ages.

181:52

Um I think uh another uh another thing

181:56

that we'll look back on is I think we we

181:58

still continue to underestimate how

182:00

important drones are going to be in

182:01

warfare. The future of all warfare is

182:04

drones. There will be nothing else on

182:05

the battlefield. Um because I think of

182:07

the end state of drones as autonomous

182:09

bullets. Not even guided autonomous like

182:11

they're self-directed. Uh, and so if

182:13

that's the future we're headed towards,

182:15

and that's a it is dist.

182:16

Why would you have an armed force that's

182:17

there's going to be no there's there's

182:18

going to be no aircraft carriers,

182:20

there's going to be no tanks, there's

182:21

going to be no infantry men, there's

182:22

just going to be autonomous bullets. Buy

182:24

autonomous bullets against your

182:25

autonomous bullets. Whichever ones win,

182:26

the other side just surrenders cuz it's

182:27

over. Um, I think that's the second

182:30

piece of it. I think a a third piece

182:33

that is going to be uh kind of

182:34

unexpected is the GLP1s, which I know

182:37

you and I have privately discussed

182:38

before. I think these are the most

182:40

breakthrough drugs since antibiotics.

182:42

Um, they're probably more important than

182:43

statins. They're sort of miracle drugs.

182:45

They seem to the there there are

182:47

downsides, but the downsides and side

182:49

effects are so minor compared to the

182:50

upsides beyond just weight loss. Um,

182:53

they also seem to be addiction breakers.

182:55

They seem to lower many kinds of cancer.

182:57

They almost metabolically reverse aging

183:00

up to a certain point. Um, and I think

183:02

they're going to bend the curve on

183:03

health care costs. And uh the big

183:06

question people are going to be asking

183:07

over the next 5 years is why are

183:09

Americans paying thousands of dollars a

183:11

month for this when people overseas are

183:12

getting them for free or I can order

183:14

them from China for free or whatever. Um

183:16

and maybe it like if I were Bernie

183:19

Sanders the platform I would be running

183:20

on is I would say okay we're going to

183:22

pay you know hundreds of billions of

183:24

dollars to Novo and Eli Liy and we're

183:26

just going to make these free or there's

183:28

hundreds of analoges of these things

183:29

that work. These are not going to be,

183:31

you know, limited to just the few that

183:33

are that are being used today. Just take

183:35

one of them or two of them, make them

183:36

free,

183:37

and I think it'll make a big difference.

183:38

And,

183:39

uh, as you and I were discussing

183:40

earlier, uh, this does bend a lot of

183:42

people out of shape who got there the

183:44

oldfashioned way, and they want to see

183:46

obesity as a moral failing on people's

183:48

parts and it lowers their status

183:51

if they are suddenly

183:53

signal is less of a signal. Yeah.

183:54

Correct. Absolutely. Yeah. So, so

183:55

they're incented to say, "Oh, well, you

183:57

don't know the downsides." it's, you

183:58

know, it's irresponsible to suggest it's

184:00

going to cause cancer. Have fun losing

184:01

bone and muscle mass. But none of that

184:03

stuff is really true. The cancer stuff

184:05

is actually beneficial on. I know people

184:07

who are now taking these things for

184:08

anti-aging reasons. Um, they're already

184:10

fit, but they just want to age better

184:12

and have a stronger insulin metabolism.

184:14

Um, and there's evidence now these

184:16

things are, you know, they put off

184:18

dementia, Alzheimer's, colon cancer.

184:21

It's insane. Cardiovascular disease,

184:23

like the the list of benefits is insane.

184:25

There's no free lunch. But

184:28

this is a class of drugs that prevents

184:30

you from taking other drugs into your

184:33

body. It prevents you from taking uh you

184:36

know too much sugar, too many calories

184:39

in an era of abundance, prevents you

184:41

from smoking, prevents you from even uh

184:44

there's an organization called Casper

184:45

that is now doing a study on heroin

184:47

addictions and they're showing that this

184:49

can lower opioid overdoses and heroin

184:51

addiction. So there's a lot of

184:53

overwhelming medical evidence coming out

184:56

and I think I don't I don't know the

184:58

exact number but I think something like

184:59

10% of the population might not have

185:01

tried these things.

185:02

I think that's the number that I' seen

185:03

as well.

185:03

It's massive.

185:04

I think it's about 50% of the population

185:06

say that they would like to try it.

185:07

Exactly. So uh I think the body

185:10

positivity movement is dead and we

185:12

always kind of knew it was a scam.

185:13

I mean it's dying very very quickly.

185:15

Yeah. Equipped like you can never be too

185:17

rich, too thin or too clean, right? And

185:19

immediately like a whole bunch of people

185:21

went nonlinear my mention like what do

185:22

you mean too thin and what about the

185:24

hygiene hypothesis and you know

185:26

obviously there's always exceptions but

185:27

people want to be thin and fit and

185:29

people want to be clean back to the

185:31

pathogen discussion that we had.

185:32

Um so I think overall that there's going

185:36

to be huge demand for these things and

185:38

our modern medical system is not built

185:40

to supply these. Well, I'm not I'm not I

185:43

don't hold it against the phases. I

185:45

think the farmers did their job by

185:46

creating the thing, but I think next we

185:48

need to step up and figure out how to

185:50

make it broadly and cheaply available as

185:52

opposed to just milk it for only for,

185:54

you know, people on obesity who can get

185:56

Medicare to sign off for it or people

185:58

paying out of pocket at very very high

185:59

prices.

186:00

Yeah.

186:00

Um the the benefits of societal

186:02

distribution of the safer GLP ones is so

186:06

large that whichever politicians uh

186:09

tackles that is going to be richly

186:11

rewarded. Well, obesity is the number

186:13

one source of malnutrition worldwide.

186:16

There's twice as many people that are

186:17

obese than are starving. So about half a

186:19

billion people are starving in a

186:20

billion.

186:20

So many problems are downstream of that.

186:22

Like you know, look at how much of the

186:23

federal budget goes into diialysis

186:25

because of kidney failure. And why is

186:26

that? It's because of diabetes, right?

186:28

So so many of the problems that we have

186:30

in modern society are downstream of

186:32

obesity. And you know this like fitness

186:34

is so important. Uh and yes, there's in

186:37

some people these things call mus cause

186:39

muscle and bone loss, but not in the

186:41

people who are eating high protein and

186:42

working out hard. So it they can be

186:44

taken a way that's safer. And some

186:46

versions of these like literal glutai,

186:48

the original one, they've been around

186:49

for decades, and the others have been

186:51

around for about a decade. So and we

186:53

already have, as you said, 10% of the

186:55

population taking them. So they're

186:56

already quite widely distributed.

186:57

A good sample size.

186:58

Yeah, it's a great sample size. What

187:00

more do you need? Like if if you if you

187:02

have a bacterial infection that's eating

187:04

you, I don't say, "Oh, I have this

187:06

antibiotic, but it's going to raise your

187:07

blood pressure." It's like, "No, take

187:08

the antibiotic." If you're going to kill

187:10

yourself, I say, "Take this

187:11

antisycchotic and stay alive a little

187:13

longer and solve it." I don't say, "Oh,

187:14

it's going to, you know, cause your

187:15

heart rate to go up by three beats a

187:17

minute. I don't worry about that." So

187:18

similarly, if you're poisoning yourself

187:20

with toxins and overuse of substances

187:22

that you shouldn't be using, either

187:23

heroin, alcohol, cigarettes, sugar, or

187:26

just sheer calories, um, take this GLP1.

187:31

Uh, they also improve digestion. You

187:33

just have less cal, just less food

187:35

matter going through your stomach. They

187:36

lower cancer risks across the board.

187:38

There's quite a few cancers that lower.

187:40

Um, cardiovasc I mean, I don't know what

187:42

else to tell you. I've been very

187:44

surprised by the negative reception

187:46

whenever you have a conversation about

187:48

GLP1s and I think a lot of it may be

187:51

people who and and well think about how

187:54

many sacred cows are being gored right

187:56

all the people who are basically saying

187:59

uh you should work harder you should be

188:00

fit like I did right it's lowering their

188:02

status think about all the nutritionists

188:04

and doctors and trainers who are now

188:06

being you know it's too easy they're

188:08

being put out of business in a way right

188:11

uh it's kind of like why does the

188:13

American military keep buying aircraft

188:14

carriers, right? In the age of drones,

188:17

um there's an incentive bias. There's a

188:20

very strong motivated reasoning. Uh but

188:22

it doesn't matter. 10% people are on it.

188:24

Uh everybody wants to be fit. It's going

188:26

to spread like wildfire. M we I was just

188:30

thinking as you were talking that you

188:31

know when we think about health and a

188:33

lot of people kind of get captured by

188:35

the way that they were brought up the

188:36

the the habits that they had from their

188:38

childhood or what mom and dad did or

188:40

genetic predisposition and stuff like

188:42

that. I think um you have as many

188:45

reasons as as many people to sort of

188:48

feel hard done by by challenges that you

188:50

had earlier on in in your life. Is

188:53

getting past your past a skill? Sort of

188:56

not being owned today by your history.

188:58

Sort of not having that victimhood

189:00

mentality. Yeah, I I did have a uh tough

189:04

childhood, but I don't think about it.

189:06

You know, I I think there are a couple

189:08

of things going on there. One is I did

189:10

process it quite a bit. I thought about

189:11

it, but I thought about it to get rid of

189:13

it. I didn't think about it to dwell on

189:15

it or to like indulge.

189:16

Yeah. I wanted to be successful. I

189:18

wanted more than anything else to rise

189:20

past that. And so I couldn't have that

189:22

as a burden on me. So I had to get rid

189:24

of it. So to the extent that I dealt

189:25

with it, it was to it was for the

189:28

express purpose of getting rid of it,

189:29

not to create an identity or story or to

189:31

reflect upon it or to say look at me,

189:33

look at what I've accomplished and look

189:34

how great I am and what I've done. So I

189:36

got rid of it and I think at some point

189:38

you you wrestle with that thing and then

189:39

you just realize like you're never going

189:41

to untangle the whole thing. It's a

189:42

Gordian knot problem. uh like Alexander

189:44

you know found that tangled knot in

189:46

India and uh they said oh the famous

189:49

conqueror will come and will untie this

189:50

knot nobody else can untie the knot and

189:52

he took one look at it pulled out a

189:53

sword and just cut it. So at some point

189:55

you just have to cut your past if your

189:56

past is bothering you you will

189:58

eventually get tired of trying to

190:00

untangle that knot and you will just

190:01

drop it because you will realize life is

190:03

short and the more you have more you

190:05

want to accomplish in this life actually

190:07

the less time you have to unravel that

190:09

thing. So I just wanted to actually get

190:11

things done. So I had no time to deal

190:13

with it. So I just cut it. It's like a

190:14

really bad relationship. But in this

190:16

case, it's a bad relationship with your

190:18

own history. So you just drop it.

190:20

Yeah. I think you know so much of what

190:22

we've spoken about today is on the

190:24

shortness of life and uh the fact that

190:27

every moment is precious. You had to

190:29

take about um that the most fundamental

190:32

resource in your life is not time, it's

190:34

attention.

190:35

That's right. I used to think, you know,

190:36

the currency of life, right? People

190:39

think it's money and yes, money is

190:40

important and it does let you trade

190:42

certain things for time, but it doesn't

190:43

really buy you time. Ask Warren Buffett

190:45

how much time money can buy you or

190:47

Michael Bloomberg. They're, you know,

190:49

rich as Scrooge and and Chris, but they

190:52

can't buy more time, right? Brian

190:53

Johnson, notwithstanding.

190:55

Um, so you can't trade money for time.

190:59

Money is not the real currency of life.

191:02

And

191:04

time itself doesn't even mean that much

191:06

because as we talked about before, a lot

191:08

of time can be wasted because you're not

191:10

really present for it. You're not paying

191:12

attention. So the real currency of life

191:14

is attention. It's what you choose to

191:16

pay attention to and and and what you do

191:19

about it. And so back to the point about

191:22

the news media, you can put your

191:24

attention on the news, but that's how

191:26

you're spending the real currency of

191:28

life. So just be aware of that. If you

191:30

want to, that's fine. There's no there's

191:32

no right or wrong here. Like maybe it is

191:34

your destiny to pick something in the

191:36

news, learn about that problem, adopt

191:38

that problem, and solve it. But just be

191:40

careful because your attention is the

191:43

only thing that you have

191:44

and that can also be captured by your

191:45

own past. It

191:47

Yes. You can fritter it away on anything

191:48

you like.

191:49

Is there an advantage to starting out as

191:51

a loser?

191:52

Uh absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. cuz if you're

191:55

because if you're a loser then you'll

191:56

want to be a winner and then you'll

191:58

develop all the characteristics that

192:00

will help you be a you know quote

192:01

unquote winner in life. That said, I

192:03

wouldn't sentence my kids to it. Like I

192:05

don't think you can artificially do

192:06

that. You know, it's it's sort of like

192:07

imagine that you were you know 300 years

192:10

ago you're born a surf and then somehow

192:12

you managed to escape off the farm and

192:14

you become a land owner and then

192:15

eventually you become minor nobility and

192:16

aristocrat. Are you going to put your

192:18

kids back on the farm and say you're

192:19

going to be a surf again? I know they

192:21

all like those stories. the the kids

192:23

themselves like those stories because it

192:24

says I came from the school of hard

192:25

knocks. My dad made me go shovel hay for

192:27

a summer. It's not real. I mean, you're

192:29

not going to trick them. Um I think what

192:32

you can all you can do is kind of uh

192:34

cultivate an appreciation and gratitude

192:36

for what you have. And the only way to

192:38

do that is just evidence it yourself,

192:40

right? Just show yourself how you spend

192:42

money, how you respect it, what you do

192:44

with it, how you take care of people,

192:46

who you're responsible for. and and and

192:49

the more resources you have, the greater

192:52

the tribe you can take care of. The more

192:53

of the tribe you can take care of. So

192:56

when you have no resources, you're

192:57

struggling to take care of yourself. And

192:58

at that point, it's good to be selfish

193:00

cuz you can't save somebody else if you

193:02

can't even save yourself. Yes.

193:04

So you take care of yourself and you

193:05

become the best version of yourself. But

193:07

there are too many men who are able,

193:10

fit, and have some money who are doing

193:12

nothing with their lives. They're just

193:13

sitting at home doing nothing, just

193:14

indulging in themselves. Maybe they go

193:16

on dates and they get Door Dash. Like I

193:17

have no respect for that. I think

193:19

there's nothing worse in society than a

193:20

lazy man

193:21

because he's sort of he's sort of

193:24

leaving it all on the table. He's

193:25

leaving his potential on the table. It's

193:26

bad for him. So the next thing you do is

193:28

you go and you have a family and you

193:30

take care of your family. Take care of

193:31

that tribe. Then you take care of your

193:32

extended family. You take care of your

193:34

cousins, brothers, uncles, grandmothers,

193:36

aunts, you know, sisters, everybody that

193:38

you can. And then if you have more

193:40

resources beyond that, then you go take

193:41

care of your local tribe. You take care

193:43

of your people. Um you start trying to

193:45

do some good for the world. And if you

193:46

have more resource than that, you go

193:47

take care of an even bigger tribe. And

193:49

that's how you earn both respect and

193:51

self-confidence and you live up to your

193:52

potential. So the the more you have, the

193:55

more is rightfully expected of you. And

193:59

I think it's a good compact with society

194:01

when highly capable people express and

194:04

flex that capability by giving more and

194:05

more and by doing more and more. And

194:07

society rewards them with the one thing

194:09

they can't get otherwise which is

194:11

status.

194:11

Right? So society should give you status

194:13

in exchange for it. Um, they should say,

194:15

"Okay, you did a good job. You took care

194:17

of more people than than just yourself

194:19

and just the people immediately around

194:20

you." Uh, and that's what an alpha male

194:23

to me is. An alpha male is not the one

194:24

who gets to eat first. The alpha male

194:26

eats last. The alpha male feeds

194:28

everybody else first and then gets to

194:29

eat last. And they do that out of their

194:31

own self-respect and pride. And society

194:33

rewards them by calling them an alpha

194:34

and giving them status.

194:36

I wonder whether some of the push back

194:37

that we've got against uh rich, wealthy,

194:41

powerful people is disincentivizing. Uh

194:44

it is like who was it? Zuck who you know

194:46

donated money at Zuckerberg General's

194:47

hospital and they wanted to pull his

194:49

name off of it. I mean that's

194:50

I didn't see that but that's

194:52

that kind of stuff backfires right you

194:54

you should reward people for doing

194:57

what were you saying before you don't

194:58

just need to in fact actually actively

195:00

avoid castigating people if you want

195:02

their behavior to change when they get

195:03

something wrong. Look at reinforcing it

195:05

when they get something right. It's

195:06

happening at a a societal level as well.

195:08

Correct. I mean, like the the guys who

195:11

make a lot of money and go out and buy

195:13

sports teams, I wouldn't do that, right?

195:16

But the one who goes out and builds a

195:18

hospital or builds a rocket to take

195:20

people to the moon, uh, you know, or

195:21

rescue some astronauts, you should be

195:23

rewarding him for that.

195:24

Mhm.

195:25

Naval, I really appreciate you. Uh, I

195:27

hope that this has lived up to whatever

195:29

weird daydreams you've been having. Um,

195:32

what have you got coming up? What can

195:34

people expect from you over the next

195:35

however long?

195:36

Expect nothing.

195:38

That's the most naval way that we could

195:40

have finished this, dude. It's uh it's

195:42

been a long time coming and I really do

195:44

appreciate you for being here today.

195:45

But I do hope you deliver something.

195:46

Oh, I think you have.

195:47

So, thank you. Thanks for having me.

195:49

Thank you, too.

195:50

Thanks for getting in my mind. And

195:51

hopefully now you're out.

195:52

We'll see. Maybe even worse now you've

195:54

got the real memories to stick.

195:56

I don't know. The reason to win the game

195:57

is to be free of it. The reason The

195:59

reason to do the podcast is to be is to

196:01

be done with it.

196:03

All right. Wow. You made it to the end.

196:06

Congratulations. Well, if you enjoyed

196:07

that, you're going to love my fulllength

196:09

conversation with the one and only

196:10

Alander Boton from the School of Life

196:13

right here.

196:16

Go on.

196:18

[Music]

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.