TRANSCRIPTEnglish

the flip flop...

26m 5s4,127 words633 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

so what's going on with the big bangs

0:02

like Barclays and Morgan Stanley and not

0:05

the Mike Wilson bear we already know

0:07

he's a bear over at Morgan Stanley what

0:09

are the uh primary researchers at the

0:12

institution suggesting well here's the

0:14

latest from Barclays and then we'll get

0:15

into Morgan Stanley they have different

0:17

looks uh at the current economy but take

0:20

a look at this fomo folks fomo

0:25

fomo has seen frustrated bears turning

0:29

into reluctant Bulls you know this

0:31

reminds me of just a week or so ago we

0:34

covered a TS Lombard piece where T.S

0:37

Lombard said look we're bears but we're

0:39

buying because stocks are going up and I

0:42

thought that was rich I'm like wait what

0:44

you're positioning into stocks even

0:46

though you're bearish because stocks are

0:48

going up and you're afraid they're going

0:50

to go up even more like if I said that

0:54

on YouTube I'd get chastised like I

0:57

already get chastised if I just say what

0:59

I'm going to do and I'm fully

1:01

transparent about it but but to say I'm

1:04

a bear but I'm gonna go long blows my

1:06

mind if people will say that

1:09

but that's true that's what's been

1:10

happening and so uh Barclays is picking

1:13

up on this and so they're talking about

1:14

position normalizing uh and uh risk

1:18

basically is spreading out uh throughout

1:21

stocks within uh the U.S economy uh

1:23

especially uh to some extent in the U.S

1:27

uh or sorry mostly in the U.S whereas in

1:30

the EU and the UK you still have a lot

1:32

more defensive positioning so what does

1:34

that mean well let's look into this most

1:36

investor types have bought equities over

1:38

the last month mutual fund Equity

1:41

inflows were the highest level in June

1:45

since February as uh private money a

1:49

move to neutralize some of their

1:51

long-standing under weight so in in

1:54

other words

1:55

you've got this uh uh this remember the

1:58

Bank of America survey where we had

2:00

somewhere around uh you know a 32

2:03

underweight from fund managers for

2:06

equities where you're starting to get

2:08

that flip-flop that's finally starting

2:11

to happen and here you see low

2:13

volatility has allowed a certain

2:16

systemic strategies to continue

2:18

re-risking and hedge fund betas to

2:21

equities nudge up okay in English

2:24

basically hey look volatility is so low

2:27

you could still buy your bearish puts

2:29

but just go long equities as well and

2:32

that's somewhat what we're starting to

2:34

see happen on top of this AI frenzy

2:37

bringing in retail investors and listen

2:40

to this who had stayed on the sidelines

2:43

for most of the Year ah depressing it

2:46

always seems like that's how folks Miss

2:49

uh some of the best returns of the

2:52

market is by waiting for like a royal

2:55

invitation to get back in getting back

2:58

in is the hard part you know you either

3:00

get in too early or you get into it late

3:02

it's very difficult to be perfect on out

3:06

perfectly and imperfectly anyway amongst

3:09

all this we note short Equity future

3:11

Physicians have been trimmed adding to

3:14

the sense of degrossing Slash going back

3:16

up towards Benchmark Equity weight in

3:18

other words balancing out going back to

3:20

all right we gotta have stocks at a

3:22

normal position in our portfolio all

3:24

right what else we have about cash here

3:26

hold on one sec

3:30

sorry I still got this still got this

3:32

nagging cuff and cold but don't worry

3:34

it's not going to stop that beautiful

3:36

sexy lecture release this weekend or

3:39

that price going up tomorrow night for

3:41

all the programs I'm building your

3:42

wealth whether it's the zero to

3:44

millionaire real estate investing the

3:46

stocks and psychology money or the

3:47

income how to make more money and get

3:50

sh9t done faster of course featuring AI

3:53

really good lectures by the way a lot of

3:56

good compliments coming out of that one

3:57

so what do we have here

3:59

despite the latest buying spree and

4:01

Equity overall positioning is balanced

4:04

at best see a lot of folks and I see

4:07

this regularly anytime you have this uh

4:10

crash in a market and then you have a

4:13

little bit of a recovery the first thing

4:15

the Bears do is say oh it's just a bear

4:17

Market rally like this is just the

4:19

beginning before we leg down again the

4:22

problem is that's how they end up having

4:24

an excuse to stay on the sidelines well

4:27

the issue then is when we continue to

4:30

actually go up their excuse starts

4:32

weighing down and you start going all

4:34

right so like how are you gonna position

4:35

now well apparently most new money is

4:40

still going into cash and bonds listen

4:44

to this

4:45

X asset flows which basically means you

4:49

know where's the money going are mostly

4:51

new money or is mostly being directed to

4:54

the bond market and money market

5:00

so let that sink in for a moment

5:02

if somebody comes upon new money so you

5:05

know they sell a house let's say and

5:07

they've got 200 Grand uh you know from

5:10

Equity from selling their home where is

5:12

most of that money well more than 50 of

5:15

it is still going into Cash via bonds or

5:19

money markets this is a way of

5:21

suggesting that you're nowhere close to

5:23

the days of Tina where everybody's like

5:25

throw everything you have into the stock

5:27

market and you have the Euphoria of

5:29

November of 2021 you're nowhere close to

5:32

that because of positioning today which

5:34

is actually bullish that's fantastic

5:38

anywho positive EPS revisions have

5:41

provided fundamental support to equity

5:43

inflows but stand in contrast to mixed

5:46

economic or activity data therefore the

5:49

upcoming earnings season maybe Make It

5:51

or Break It for stocks we've talked

5:53

about this as well that

5:55

you would expect some pre-positioning

5:58

going into this Q2 earnings season and I

6:01

think that's why we've seen some

6:02

volatility over the last few days where

6:04

we've had quite a few red days and by

6:06

quite a few red days I mean like four

6:08

and because of not only some end of the

6:11

quarter rebalancing but also hedging

6:14

going into earnings all right fine what

6:17

else

6:18

Tech is driving Regional Equity flows

6:21

all right well we kind of knew that uh

6:23

that's U.S investors however are

6:26

starting to sell their European equities

6:29

for the first time this year now this I

6:31

found interesting

6:32

I've been saying probably for just quite

6:35

frankly a few years now get me out of

6:38

Emerging Markets I don't want Emerging

6:39

Markets I don't want the S P 500 I want

6:42

Tech chips and Innovation I don't care

6:45

about the rest of the world going

6:47

through this crisis I think the us is

6:49

going to weather at the best and you're

6:51

finally actually getting

6:53

rotation uh from us investors dumping

6:57

their foreign crap and getting more

7:01

properly positioned in U.S stocks

7:04

good

7:05

uh and that's probably because Europe is

7:07

feared to actually go into the recession

7:09

or a recession whereas the U.S May Dodge

7:11

it outflows from UK stocks continue

7:14

unabated amid A Renewed stagflation

7:17

worries yeah especially with that spike

7:19

in inflation over there

7:23

uh Japan continues to see strong inflows

7:26

I'm not sure why but anyway

7:31

Tech inflow's masked uneven sector Trend

7:35

positioning on banks cut sharply Global

7:38

flows have been going predominantly into

7:40

Tech but active manager performance in

7:42

Europe have taken a hit

7:45

as value slash cyclicals have fared

7:47

better in Europe so in other words for

7:50

Europe value stocks America Tech baby

7:54

Tech exposure has quickly moved to above

7:56

average for hedge funds that's true but

7:59

not yet for your typical investment

8:02

advisors keep in mind that's different

8:04

from a hedge fund a hedge fund pretty

8:07

much anybody can make a hedge fund you

8:08

don't have to be licensed to create an

8:10

hedge fund hedge fund is just sort of

8:12

like yo I got fun

8:14

accredited investors give me your money

8:17

and I'll I'll trade with it that's

8:19

basically a hedge fund that's different

8:21

from like an ETF where you position into

8:24

specific stocks with a specific

8:26

predetermined strategy that's

8:28

transparent uh and it's different from a

8:31

financial advisor actually sitting down

8:33

with somebody personally and giving them

8:35

Financial advice I've never done that uh

8:37

you know even though I'm a licensed

8:38

financial advisor I got my license for

8:40

my ETF but um but anyway so what else do

8:43

we have here

8:44

lower Equity volatility May persist

8:46

through the summer fine all right boring

8:49

uh some of this is somewhat insightful

8:50

though okay

8:52

frustrated Bears have become reluctant

8:54

Bulls over the last month mutual funds

8:57

resumed buying equities for the first

8:59

time since February now that's a big

9:01

deal mutual funds buying that's great a

9:05

lot of the uh the folks with money

9:08

um

9:08

they still put money in the mutual funds

9:10

I don't know why I don't know why you

9:12

put your money into a mutual fund

9:13

instead of instead of an ETF I literally

9:16

cannot find a single reason why you

9:19

would do that what people still do and

9:21

the fees are a lot higher

9:23

anyway the tax benefits aren't as great

9:26

talk to a CPA anyway

9:29

the bigger year-to-date picture is

9:30

unchanged with most it flows going to

9:33

Safe assets and the flows to equities

9:35

may prove fleeting

9:42

and they always say that anyway last

9:44

week Equity flows turned negative again

9:46

on hawkish uh Central Bank talk and weak

9:49

data but it's noteworthy that equities

9:51

were being bought despite the negative

9:53

economic data yep that is a

9:56

style of going risk on

9:58

all right great what else so uh here's

10:02

the bull bear indicate index mostly

10:04

positive now since the start of 2020 uh

10:07

two or the most positive since the start

10:09

of 22. you can see here at the end of

10:11

2021 you really got this big decline

10:16

and that really started moving up again

10:18

at the beginning of 2023. fantastic okay

10:22

so we got Morgan Stanley to look at in

10:24

just a moment as well but I like looking

10:26

at this here high frequency data like

10:28

retail call option buying has moved up

10:30

sharply to the highest level in more

10:32

than a year uh I I generally prefer

10:35

buying shares just because remember with

10:39

timing the market

10:41

uh when you're doing options you're

10:44

really timing it two times if not three

10:46

times because you're timing the buy and

10:50

then you're determining how long to hold

10:51

and then you're determining close and

10:53

then do you roll the option or do you go

10:55

to shares there's there's a lot that

10:59

could go wrong

11:00

whereas if you just buy shares and the

11:02

stock goes up boy it's a lot less

11:04

stressful and and you know selling calls

11:07

in a Nike Swoosh environment is risky

11:11

uh although some people look and go hey

11:14

you know made good money this year so

11:15

far why not fair fine

11:21

but then again you know the crazy thing

11:24

is the year has almost perfectly aligned

11:27

with when we started seeing the Nike

11:29

Swoosh I don't know that anybody really

11:31

expected that I know we expected the tax

11:33

loss harvesting in December and then

11:34

rebuying Jan but the fact that we pretty

11:37

much Nike swooshed starting jn1

11:39

pretty wild so of course you're going to

11:42

have outsized gains year to date for

11:45

2020 uh uh three but most people didn't

11:48

buy all their junk you know in the first

11:51

trading day of January

11:53

anywho so what do we have here uh option

11:56

volumes high demand pick it up again

11:57

great Rising optimism on stocks amongst

12:00

retail okay uh cash bonds remain King

12:04

yep talked about that already all right

12:06

so we're going to go over to Morgan

12:08

Stanley uh we'd like to take a look at

12:11

Morgan Stanley so Morgan Stanley oh

12:14

Morgan what have you to say so Morgan

12:17

Stanley this was a little wild you ready

12:20

for this

12:21

new work on the labor market now

12:25

supports a soft Landing

12:28

you know I'm trying to find bearish

12:31

pieces but even the Bears are starting

12:33

to sound bullish

12:35

kind of interesting

12:37

so what do you got over here you got we

12:40

see wage growth slowing into 2024 but

12:43

identify five key factors that should

12:46

keep the unemployment rate low

12:48

underpinning or call for a soft Landing

12:52

all right let's get into the five

12:54

factors in detail so hard Landings are

12:57

recession our call for a soft Landing is

13:00

underpinned

13:02

by a market a labor market that slows

13:06

but remains resilient as companies in

13:09

certain sectors continue to backfill

13:11

position positions as well as retain

13:13

existing workers now this is interesting

13:16

so consider this idea of of a back

13:20

filling and what Morgan Stanley is going

13:22

to do is they're going to evaluate as

13:24

well as what other institutions have

13:26

been doing is they're evaluating this

13:28

idea that a lot of people have at their

13:30

jobs potentially been overworked

13:33

since the pandemic just because it's

13:35

been so hard to get your hands on uh

13:41

this this actual

13:42

um proper amount of Labor and so what

13:45

they've done companies done in general

13:47

is if they just overwork their existing

13:50

uh workers and backfilling is a way of

13:53

saying okay let's take some of that

13:55

stress off and start pulling back a

13:58

little bit to where we're saying all

13:59

right let's let's distribute this evenly

14:01

and that really that type of back

14:03

feeling supports continued hiring so

14:06

that way you're not putting as much

14:07

stress on your existing workers anymore

14:09

there's actually another piece by

14:11

unicredit

14:12

uh uni credit right here is a piece we

14:14

broke this down this was just from a

14:16

couple days ago here but take a look at

14:18

this segment right here there are many

14:21

factors that could explain the slow

14:23

response of the labor market to the

14:26

fed's tightening cycle well we know

14:28

we've gone up 500 basis points so why is

14:29

the labor market doing so well

14:34

First the full effect of a monetary

14:37

policy change on output is usually

14:39

transmitted with a lag we know that

14:42

unemployment tends to be lagging

14:44

so in other words

14:46

that we're still gaining significantly

14:49

into what we've gone to a pretty tighter

14:51

restrictive macro environment led by the

14:54

FED second unusually high savings stock

14:58

built up during the pandemic has allowed

15:00

household to keep spending now we've

15:02

heard this before people have more money

15:04

with the exception of those in the lower

15:07

maybe 40 percent of incomes they've

15:10

already spent their money but those

15:12

higher levels are continuing to spend

15:13

and that's supporting earnings growth at

15:15

companies or even if it's not earnings

15:17

growth at least it's supporting earnings

15:19

flatness but that earnings flatness is

15:22

allowing companies to retain their

15:24

talent

15:25

third still high profitability of firms

15:28

right well that combines with spending

15:31

right you need revenue and the

15:32

profitability is is margin you're not

15:35

having to squeeze margin so low yet that

15:38

you're saying look just to survive we

15:39

need to start laying people off you

15:41

haven't gotten to that point yet I

15:42

really think some of the layoffs that

15:44

we've seen at Big Tech have been what I

15:47

call opportunistic layoffs opportunistic

15:50

layoffs are kind of where you're like

15:51

dude we've gotten bloated we've hired

15:54

too many people half of these people

15:55

don't even show up for work they they

15:58

they're not productive they don't care

16:00

they're just collecting a paycheck if we

16:03

fire them we're going to get sued

16:05

but if we lay them off because of an

16:08

economic recession

16:09

then they won't sue us

16:11

I I honestly think a lot of that goes on

16:15

anyway

16:16

uh and then uh finally the service

16:18

sector

16:19

which is driving the phase of the

16:21

recovery uh is is a a sector that favors

16:25

a shift from spending Goods you know

16:27

obviously to Services whatever whatever

16:28

uh is is uh is still expanding and so

16:32

you've got these these five elements

16:34

that are why you're seeing this labor

16:37

hoarding and I thought this piece was

16:39

perfect to combine with the Morgan

16:40

Stanley piece right here uh wait for

16:43

that right here to load there we go

16:45

because that's what they're talking

16:47

about this labor hoarding and now Morgan

16:50

Stanley

16:54

phrases this slightly differently they

16:56

suggest that the economy is still

16:57

understaffed uh and this is what that

17:00

backfilling means where you're saying

17:01

look we're still overworking people and

17:03

we get another person in now we can get

17:05

into a little bit more of Labor balance

17:07

at our companies uh and really a lot of

17:10

companies don't want to lay off the good

17:13

workers just for the sake of a little

17:16

bit of a margin boost because when the

17:18

economy starts booming again it's gonna

17:20

be hard to find those people again so

17:22

it'd be better to get through the tough

17:25

time with less revenue or maybe flat uh

17:29

net income or whatever

17:31

but at least get through with great

17:33

people who are going to do fantastic

17:34

work going into the next cycle

17:37

so uh that was fascinating from Morgan

17:39

Stanley as well as uni credit uh so

17:42

that's a little bit on hiring but uh

17:45

what else do we have here

17:47

when it comes to productivity Morgan

17:49

Stanley made this interesting argument

17:51

about a GDP looking at GDP data per

17:54

worker and that's how they were

17:56

identifying that people are still being

17:58

overworked and that maybe by hiring more

18:02

you're actually just bringing this into

18:04

a balance and that's why you're

18:06

potentially continuing to see this

18:07

hiring what else

18:11

we also note this here past Cycles

18:14

indicate that state and local jobs tend

18:17

to recover more slowly than private

18:20

sector employment mainly due to revenue

18:22

shortfalls causing budget pressures and

18:24

the inability to keep up with private

18:26

wages so really uh it's a way of saying

18:30

that

18:31

when the economy starts booming the

18:33

private sector gets all the jobs because

18:35

the government doesn't have as much

18:36

money to pay competitive prices

18:38

uh and in a few recessions local

18:41

government workers actually end up

18:43

losing uh jobs because even local

18:47

governments get squeezed but that's more

18:49

like your 1981 and 2008 recessions knock

18:52

on wood you don't see that today that

18:54

would be bad when you start seeing that

18:56

that public sector laying off people uh

19:00

however as the private sector slows down

19:03

and they finish their back filling now

19:06

the government can actually step in and

19:09

start hiring people because there's less

19:11

competition for people so this is kind

19:13

of wild I hadn't heard this argument

19:15

before but take a moment here and think

19:17

about that for a moment one second

19:20

I'm so sorry this this cough is just

19:23

absolutely killing me uh but every time

19:25

I take like a brief little pause just

19:27

think that when I'm coughing I'm going

19:29

coupon code expires tomorrow

19:32

all right so I hadn't thought about this

19:35

before but I think it's it's such an

19:36

interesting perspective that okay so

19:39

private sector hiring goes down

19:43

and then you kind of go low and then

19:45

it's almost like you hit like a clown

19:47

Bell thing oh now governments can hire

19:50

government hiring goes up and so the

19:53

overall level of hiring actually stays

19:56

elevated that's actually kind of

19:58

incredible

19:59

was fascinating

20:01

all right let's keep going here uh so

20:05

let's see okay that's the labor hoarding

20:07

segment what else do we have here uh

20:10

Morgan Stanley suggests that they do not

20:12

see unemployment getting close to six

20:14

percent

20:15

they don't see it uh they think that

20:18

unemployment may increase slightly but

20:20

nothing close to the levels of six

20:22

percent a prediction of six percent

20:24

assumes the post-covered relationship

20:26

between post uh postings and

20:29

unemployment scene from 2020 to April

20:31

2022 remains valid

20:33

we argue that the shape or position of

20:36

the curve curves that they refer to may

20:38

change over time and point to the fact

20:39

that recent data prints seem to be

20:41

moving along a different path now they

20:43

use these these fancy uh charts here

20:45

like the um Beaver Ridge curve which on

20:49

one side plots the vacancy rate on on

20:51

the other side plots the unemployment

20:53

rate and the idea is that usually the

20:56

lower the vacancy rate the higher the

20:58

unemployment percentage

21:03

but as is usually a problem with uh

21:06

history is that

21:08

every cycle has elements that are

21:10

different and so now they're charting a

21:13

soft Landing they're like wait a minute

21:14

we have a higher vacancy and a lower

21:16

unemployment rate this is interesting so

21:19

you know things slightly different than

21:22

you would have otherwise expected

21:24

uh in addition to that they expect

21:25

higher labor force participation will

21:28

come out and I will continue to see

21:30

labor force participation actually grow

21:31

over the next few months now there were

21:35

some uh banks that uh I don't have a

21:39

full piece on from them but there were

21:41

some banks talking about how they expect

21:43

Unemployment uh claims and the jobs

21:47

creation level to finally actually start

21:50

showing negative negative reads uh

21:54

starting in about September October

21:56

which is actually coming up we're

21:58

already basically in July which is crazy

22:00

that means we're already done with half

22:02

of the year uh that's that's pretty

22:04

remarkable

22:06

but uh anywho so uh here is also an

22:12

exercise where they come to this

22:13

conclusion say in a more recent example

22:16

a positive 100 basis point shock to

22:19

wages

22:20

only raises inflation by 10 basis points

22:24

now this was another shocker to me

22:26

because history tells us that a wage

22:30

price spiral occurs when wages rise

22:33

price is rise but this cycle I don't

22:37

like to use the phrase this time is

22:39

different but this cycle has so far been

22:42

different in that this isn't so far

22:44

really been a wage driven inflation it

22:47

was a money Printing and supply chain

22:49

driven inflation disaster

22:51

and so now you've got Morgan Stanley

22:54

estimating that even if we see wages

22:57

Rise by one percent we actually expect

23:00

inflation to only go up one tenth of

23:02

that that's insane 10 basis points so in

23:06

other words to get a full percent of

23:08

inflation you would have to see wages go

23:11

up

23:12

10 percent

23:14

that's insane

23:16

they call this the fall in the

23:19

inflationary pass-through representing a

23:22

substantial reduction in the dynamic

23:25

effect of wages which is something that

23:28

history would be like no

23:30

but the recent data is showing exactly

23:33

that

23:34

look at this

23:36

wages explain only minimal fraction of

23:39

price movement in in recent years you

23:43

can see that here in the uh the orange

23:45

this is how much wages are really

23:47

contributing to inflation relative to

23:50

the blue which is how much wages used to

23:52

contribute to inflation between the 70s

23:54

and 1999 that's remarkable so

23:59

how do we piece this together well you

24:01

have Barclays talking about bears

24:04

becoming Bulls because they're following

24:06

yet positioning still mostly cash and

24:09

bonds are you kidding

24:11

and then Morgan Stanley's like

24:13

yo this employment situation ain't that

24:15

bad and uni credit both of them are like

24:18

dude even if private sector hiring goes

24:20

down the government step in it'll be

24:22

their turn so you got buffers

24:24

unemployment rate probably won't go as

24:26

much up as much as people fear and uh

24:29

wages aren't actually driving inflation

24:32

this is remarkable like I I really

24:36

I want bad news

24:38

uh because I I want to challenge my

24:42

opinions you know I met with um who

24:46

remembers where I did the interview with

24:47

Gordon Johnson

24:52

this sucks man

24:54

anyway I did the interview with uh

24:56

Gordon Johnson

24:57

and uh you know he's a Tesla bear

25:00

and one of the reasons I wanted to do

25:03

that and you should look it up just type

25:04

into YouTube meet Kevin Gordon Johnson

25:06

it's really good

25:07

but one of the reasons I like

25:09

putting myself in front of the Bears is

25:11

because I I truly want to hear their

25:13

argument and I'm like give me the best

25:15

you got

25:16

you know like make a good presentation

25:19

convince me to sell is what I say

25:23

and I just haven't been convinced yeah

25:26

so so that's not saying I'm gonna be

25:29

right but um

25:32

you know I mean obviously inflation

25:34

could somehow magically Skyrocket again

25:36

I guess in America it should happen in

25:38

England which you know in the United

25:40

Kingdom is but uh

25:43

they're not short of that

25:45

it just doesn't seem that horrible now I

25:47

want you to know this when it comes to

25:48

AI

25:50

time is what's going to make you money

25:52

and if you can prove that value to an

25:55

employer you'll always be able to be

25:57

employed so this is another way of

25:59

making sure that you don't get replaced

26:02

but

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.