Ultimate Beginner Guide to Pro Trading
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Hi, let's be real. If you clicked here,
it's probably because you're another
financially illiterate who just goes on
YouTube to search how to make some money
with trading. Maybe you saw a guy
claiming to have become rich by flipping
some memecoin or you saw a forex guru
flaunting his Lambo and his lifestyle.
Just know that's all [ __ ] It's all
a scam. Forget about it. That is not
professional trading. Plus, every video
on YouTube that has a title similar to
this one will likely show you how to
draw a bunch of lines on a chart, follow
some price [music] patterns, or some
magical combination of indicators, and
you'll end up trusting people with zero
credentials. Try trading with a broker
they have an affiliate link with so that
they can earn commissions from the money
you will eventually lose. So, you'll
lose money. You'll have to buy their
premium program or some signal room or
some other shortcut that will not lead
you to trading success anyway. You'll
become a gambling addict, fall for more
scams, and lose money for years. And I'm
not joking. This is literally what
happens to millions of people that
approach trading. But lucky for both of
us, today you've clicked on a video,
which is slightly different. A video
where someone, yours truly, will finally
wake you up on how trading actually
works, where you'll understand it's not
all fun and games and quick money on a
chart. I will be brutally honest with
you so you know how it really works. see
if trading is even the right business
model for you and what it actually takes
to be successful. And I am in a unique
position to teach you this because
unlike most of trading YouTubers, over
the last 6 years, I've been studying and
trading the market side by side in the
professional trading floors of world
trading champions like Patrick Mill, two
times world trading champion,
professional portfolio manager, or Jan
Smolen, three times world trading
champion, who's also a macro hedge fund
trader. people who have documented in
the world stage three-digit returns per
year consistently for more than 5 years.
One of my mentors have managed [music]
$20 billion in a European bank and is
now a hedge fund manager for example.
And we're talking about people who are
barely on social medias at all that I
had to look really hard for and pay tens
if not hundreds of thousands of dollar
to learn their trading strategies which
unlike most retail traders on YouTube
who just show you some screenshots taken
from offshore brokers god knows where
they're from which are 99% fake. These
people have audited results and I have
managed thanks to this professional
education to become consistently
profitable and generate alpha. And I'm
one of the few people you're going to
find online that has actually shared a
live broker login with a regulated
broker. And I'll keep sharing my
performance and my journey fully
transparently on this channel. So if
you're tired of the [ __ ] and you
want to cut to the real stuff, I can
confidently say this is one of the few
places you're going to be able to find
it. This is not going to be that kind of
dopamine friendly video where by the end
of it you'll be automatically profitable
and be able to make $5,000 a day type of
thing cuz that, as we have established,
is complete [ __ ] This will be a
brutally realistic video where I've
condensed literally the best [ __ ]
knowledge you can possibly find on the
face of the internet gathered in 6 years
of trading education, academic research,
and personal experience with world top
traders on how to become a pro trader, a
professional of the trading business.
And like, bro, we're talking about
finance, okay? This is no [ __ ]
[music] game, okay? People study for
decades and have PhDs for this [ __ ] And
it's not an online [music] business
model either where you have to sell a
product to some people. We're talking
about becoming an emotionally neutral
ninja sniper that reads where the banks
and the smart [music] money are moving
their money and being able to predict
this flow of money consistently through
time. It's not quick and easy money.
It's a skill that will take time to
build, likely years. And whoever tells
you that a video is enough or 6 months
is enough, they're lying to your face.
So, this is how it's going to go down. I
will first place your expectations in
the right place so you don't lose your
money like a degenerate gambling right
away. You're welcome. I will show you
what financial [music] markets really
are, the difference between an average
retail trader and a protrader who can
manage to build generational wealth with
trading. How professionals read the
markets. how they analyze it through
fundamentals, [music] order flow and
option flow. How do they build a
strategy and what strategy they use and
being able to not only survive in the
game but thriving in it, making two,
three, even fourdigit return per year.
So, buckle up, save this video in a
watch later list or something. Going to
be a long video packed with value that
normally gets charged tens of thousands
of dollars for, but that will give you
professional trading knowledge and a
clear road map. So, pause the video now,
take pen and paper cuz we're getting
started. So, let's start from the basic.
What is trading? Is it like trying to
buy a meme coin at $1 and then selling
it at $20 for a 20x profit? Technically,
yes. Or trying to trade forex every time
price crosses a weird line. Technically,
that's also trading. Those are retail
trading strategies that 99% of people
use to lose the savings they were
supposed to use to pay off their student
loans. But that's just a more advanced
and cooler form of gambling, right? It's
a casino. Very few get lucky. Very few
times. 99% don't. That is not a reliable
business model. What professional
trading really is is the most advanced
and at the same time the most accessible
glitch in the matrix. It's not a
business, okay? You're not creating a
product and then selling it to a market
for a profit. But for the purpose of
this video, for those who seriously want
to learn the skill of trading and become
able with a couple of smart decisions
every day, repeated for a long time to
potentially make fuckloads of money, we
need to properly differentiate retail
trading from real professional trading.
And for us, a definition of a prot
trader is a person who is capable of
consistently milking money out of
financial markets by executing a
predetermined riskadjusted strategy that
has a statistically valid edge. So when
you want to become a trader, you're not
just starting a new business. You're
embarking on a journey to become a more
disciplined person, a more stoic person,
a patient person who doesn't let
emotions influence his decisional
process. And you have to become capable
of consistently milking money out of
financial markets. Not once, not a
one-time flip. You have to build a skill
and keep that skill sharp, refining it
and sharpen it like a sword, just like a
chess grandmaster or a professional
fighter or a higher ranked sniper who
worked both hard and smart for years
building and refining a skill. Second
point, you don't make money, you milk
it. And I specifically chose this word
because in trading again, you're not
creating something and making money out
of it. You're just taking money from
someone else. Thanks to a smart decision
to click a button on a screen, which is
something that just doesn't happen in
any other business model. And only in
the trading model can you scale to six,
seven, nine figures without a team,
without building websites or brands,
without having to know about marketing,
about fulfillment, customer care, sales,
managing team, dealing with angry
customers, or with any people at all for
that matter. None of this. You literally
just need to push a button, right? buy
at the right moment, sell at the right
moment, any financial asset, and get
paid. But you don't just guess the right
moment. By finding the right moment, I
actually mean executing a predetermined
risk adjusted strategy that has a
statistically valid edge. Again, yes,
you're pushing a button, but you're not
just improvising like just pushing a
button in slot machine and seeing what
happens. Your job is to apply a strategy
and find a strategy that has an edge
before you even think of entering a
trade. Your edge is your boat in this
crazy ocean. So what exactly is an edge
in trading? You have an edge when you
have a profitable expectancy. So when
you can confidently expect your trades
to be profitable on a large enough
sample and there's three main element of
your trading edge. The first one is the
win rate. And the win rate is on 100
trades how many of them are wins versus
how many of them are losses. So you have
a win rate and a loss rate. If you win
60 trades out of 100, you have a 60% win
rate. The second element is the
riskto-reward ratio, also known as RR.
And this means if I risk $1 per trade,
how many dollars do I earn? For example,
if I risk $10 to make $20, that is a 1:2
risk-to-reward ratio. So, if I'm trading
a stock and I buy it, I can place a
stop-loss $10 below the current price
where I choose to accept a loss and put
a takerit 20 points above where I expect
to take a profit. And these are two
levels that I'm willing to sell at close
my trade. But the relationship between
your stop-loss and your take-profit is
your risk-to-reward ratio. So, for
example, if you have a 50% win rate with
a 1:2 risk-to-reward ratio, and you're
able to achieve this consistently as a
result of your trading, you will be
profitable. You will have a positive
expectancy. So, you would expect to be
profitable and have a profit factor
higher than one. A profit factor is the
total sum of your wins divided by the
total sum of your losses. A profitable
edge is anything above [music] one. So
in zero sum games in the field of
stochastic events there is a
relationship between win rate and
risk-to-reward rate which is win rate
equals 1 over 1 + reward or your reward
to risk ratio. So technically if you
were to trade completely randomly
flipping a coin with a fixed 1:1
risk-to-reward ratio on a large enough
data sample you'll tend to have a 50%
win rate. If you were to trade
completely randomly with a 1:2 fixed
risk-to-reward ratio you will tend to
have a 33.3% win rate. And if you plot
on a chart all possible combination,
this line forms, which is the break even
line. This is where random trading
technically brings you. But since for
trading you need to pay commissions and
likely a spread, if you trade randomly,
you will technically lose money. But
let's say below this line there is the
losing area and above this line there's
the profitability area. An area with a
profit factor below one and an area with
a profit factor above one. Your goal is
that your strategy is an anomaly that
manages to beat randomness and have a
combination between win rate and
risk-to-reward ratio above the break
even line. That makes it profitable. And
if you're just going to gamble, you're
going to non-randomly be in the losing
area, which is statistically speaking as
impressive as being in the profitability
area because you are achieving
non-random results. So you could just
take a bunch of unprofitable trader,
copy their trade the opposite way, and
be profitable. That's what brokers do,
specifically CFD Forex brokers. But if
you're here, you want to become
profitable. And there's three ways to
find an edge that gives you a positive
expectancy. The first one is algorithmic
trading or systematic trading. This is a
path that you can choose to follow,
which is not going to be covered in this
video, but it's probably one of the most
common ways to trade in the professional
space. So, you learn how to code with
Python, MLQ, Easy Language. You build an
automated trading algorithm with a
series of if then functions where if all
conditions are met, opens trades on your
behalf. And this is very powerful
because you don't have to worry about
opening the trades yourself and you're
way less likely to incur in
psychological mistake, cognitive biases,
and emotional trading. But that comes
with a very unique set of problems
because someone else out there will tell
you that systematic trading or
algorithmic trading is the best way of
trading that you can simply let money
work for you. But that's absolute
[ __ ] I've met with a lot of
algorithmic traders. I run some
algorithms myself. and algorithms since
they have a fixed set of rules that are
being applied to a very dynamic entity
such as financial markets. [music] These
bots just at some point will break
because markets tend to be efficient
when someone else finds the same edge.
And since the strategy is very
mechanical and very rule-based, very
likely that someone else will find the
same edge or that the counterpart that
made that edge profitable will
disappear. And because of this efficient
nature in markets, algorithmic
systematic edges at some point stop
working. So as an algorithmic trader,
you constantly have to look for new
edges and maybe run a portfolio of 20,
30, 50, 100 different trading systems
and monitor their performance. Maybe
choose to switch some systems off,
switch some systems on based on how
markets condition vary. And how you find
an edge here is you build a hypothesis,
you test it in the past, also known as
back beck testing [music] or insample
data collection and you see if that idea
works in the past. Then there is usually
a fitting phase where you try to
optimize the performance of the bot by
tweaking the entry rules here and there.
And the main risk here is overfitting.
So to perfectly calibrate the strategy
on past data and make it so good on past
data that it will not work with new data
in the present in the future. Plus if
HID has worked in the past there's no
guarantee that it will work in the
future. So it takes a lot of research
and a lot of constant monitoring and if
you want to achieve outstanding
performance with algorithms it is a
full-time job. So it has pros and cons
and in my experience what I've seen is
that most trading system will tend to be
[music] slightly above the break even
line and achieve a profit factor of 1.2
1.3 1.5 [music]
1.6 maybe two in the best cases. So
that's the first way to find an edge.
The second way to find an edge is with
manual trading or discretionary trading
which is completely different and
requires you to build a different set of
skills because with discretionary
trading you trade manually and you trade
based on your personal view of the
markets on the way you analyze markets
the way you analyze price the way you
analyze volume the way you analyze
macroeconomic [music] trend and market
sentiment. So in discretionary trading,
you are the edge. That's why no one can
copy you. And that's why you are not a
victim of edge decay or alpha decay in
the same way that algorithmic traders
do. You don't have to learn how to code,
but you have to learn how to analyze
markets [music] and how to get in tune
with the markets and being able to
analyze the sentiment of the markets.
And [music] by training your pattern
recognition abilities to recognize
patterns through hours and hours of
sitting in front of the charts and
patiently executing your smartest trade
ideas, which is still a logicbased and
rational way of doing trading, but it's
not based on statistical mathematical
probability. It's based on subjective
probability. Something similar to baian
probability where as new factors come
into place the probability of an event
happening vary through time. As you
gather new information and discretionary
trading is a skill that takes time to
master. But it's like training your own
neural network. And not a lot of people
are able to have the mental resilience
to be able to become successful [music]
discretionary traders. But those few who
manage to become one, their edge is way
above the profitability area. The most
successful traders I've met, even though
they do run also algorithms, they've all
built a skill of discretionary trading.
They know how to read orderflow. They
know how to understand macroeconomics.
They've seen the reactions of [music]
market during specific times of day or
when some news come out and they're able
to join the trend with an extremely high
accuracy and potentially with both a
high win rate and a high risk-to-reward.
and that brings them deep in the
profitability area. But a lot of people
since discretionary trading becomes a
mental game where you have to trust your
cognitive abilities and learn how to
refine them as you build them, the
majority of aspiring discretionary
traders fail because they don't have the
necessary mental resilience and
discipline. And that's why there is a
third way which I define as hybrid
trading which is a trading that is
manual but is more mechanical. So it's a
set of rules where on top of which you
add your own interpretation of price
action and orderflow dynamics and your
own interpretation of market behavior to
base your edge on something rational and
solid and rule-based and then gradually
build your skill on top which is I think
the best way for beginners [music] to
start building the right habits.
So we have understood what an edge
technically is and the three different
ways to find an edge. But before you
choose how to trade, there's also other
things you need to consider. And a very
crucial choice you have to take is which
style of trading you're going to
implement because you could either be a
scalper or a day trader. So trading
inside of a single day and take short
price movements and maybe your trades
will last some minutes or some hours.
And that is a trading style that
requires time in front of the charts for
at least 4 to 5 hours every day, which
is likely compatible if you have another
stream of income as a freelancer, for
example. Because in the early stages,
you're not going to make a lot of money
and you still need some stream of cash
flow to survive. And becoming profitable
as a day trader in under one year is
very irrealistic. Or if you work a 9
to-5 for example, you can start with
swing trading which is a much better
option if you don't have a lot of time
to trade because swing trading requires
way less active management of positions
and you open a trade to stay inside for
days, weeks or even months if you are a
position trader. So with swing trading,
you try and join longerterm price
swings. So based on how much time you
can invest in trading, you should choose
a trading style that fits your schedule.
And again, in this video, we're going to
take a look at day trading strategies
and swing trading strategies. Or if you
think that you don't feel ready to
embark on the trading journey that is
not worth for you, you should consider
investing instead and gradually build
your capital through time with other
sources of cash flow and simply use
financial markets as a place to park
your capital. not have any active
management of your capital at all and
have a business, a job or a freelance
profession as your source of cash flow
to pour money into your investment
account to avoid your capital being
eroded by inflation, which is something
I strongly advise everyone to do. And
maybe we'll do a video about investing
in the future here, but now we're
talking about trading. So, in this next
chapter, we'll start understanding
financial markets, how they really work,
and understanding the money flow of the
markets.
So in order to analyze the market and
analyze it in the most logical possible
way, let's ask ourself these five
crucial questions. What is moving? Who
is moving it? When, where, and how,
where, what moves of course are prices
of financial asset. And the analysis of
prices is also known as price action
analysis. traders. We earn from price
swinging up, swinging down, buying at a
low price, selling at a higher price, or
sell short a high price hoping to buy
back at a good price. The second
question we need to ask is who's moving
price? And these are market
participants. And there's a lot of
different types of market participants
which operate inside of the market for
different reasons. And I personally like
to divide them into three main
categories or actually four main
categories. These categories being big
money, smart money, market makers, and
retail traders. And let's define big
money as big market participants such as
central banks, commercial banks, pension
funds, sovereign funds, university
endowments, investment funds, and big
companies. Smart money instead are hedge
funds, investment banks, HFT firms. And
they are still big money as in they are
a big portion of the who the who moves
the market. And we need to make a
distinction between smart money and big
money. Because what we mean by smart
money is not just a big money market
participants such as central banks,
commercial banks, pension funds,
sovereign funds, blah blah blah that are
inside of the market to stay for a long
time and they just pour money into the
markets without caring too much about
filling of their orders. Smart money
participants instead engage and invest a
lot of money in something called
execution alpha which is basically a
field of trading that refers to how do
we optimize the execution of such big
orders in such a way that we pour this
big money without impacting price and
basically not caring about where you get
filled. these market participants are
putting a little more effort into having
an alpha also in how they place these
big trades in the market and they will
engage in smart order routings maybe
some orderflow manipulation tactics and
this is for example a screenshot that
I've taken from a company that as a main
job and business model is providing best
execution algorithms and they have
several way that they implement this
execution alpha such as volumedriven
algorithm and price driven algorithms
where big orders are poured inside of
the market based on volume weighted
average price. So from the open close of
the session as price moves and volumes
moves throughout the day. So the market
volume goes up and the volume that
they're feeling is kind of following how
volume averages throughout the session.
So they don't get slipped too much or
they have time weighted average price.
So they just place the orders gradually
throughout a single session but at the
same level of volume. There's
participation target close only at the
closing of the session or priced driven
algorithms so at steps or momentum
value. These are all techniques that are
widely known and used in the
institutional space to improve the
firm's alpha also in the execution
stage. Then you have the small money
that encompasses not only retails, small
prop firms, maybe some CPOS, some
commodity pool operators, some commodity
trading advisors. And by prop trading
firms, I mean small firms managing maybe
a couple million dollars, 10, 20, 50,
100 up to a hundred million. Let's say
it's considerable a small proprietary
trading firm. So people trading with
their own money or CPOS, CTAs, AMC's
which are a form of let's call it a
small fund and retail traders which can
vary drastically. You have retail
traders that are managing tens of
millions of dollars or retail traders
that are managing a couple hundred
thousand dollars or people just trading
with the $100 in their account. Let's
consider all of this to be small money.
And then you have market makers. And
market firms could be considered smart
money, but their business model is so
unique because market makers are not
trying to speculate. They're not trying
to hedge with long positions. The only
thing that market makers are doing is
providing liquidity. So, as we will see
later, every market has a bid price and
an ask price. The bid is the closest buy
offer. The ask is the closest sell
offer. And the distance between these
two is called spread cuz maybe if you
want to sell, you can sell to a buyer at
99. And if you want to buy, you're going
to buy maybe at 100. And so this $1
spread is what people pay to be able to
trade market. And market makers are the
one selling here and buying here. And so
they and so the spread that is paid by
trader that's what they earn. So they
quote both the ask and the bid and earn
a spread every time price goes up and
down up and down up down a single tick.
That's where and how they earn money in
all sorts of market. And this will later
be important to understand and we will
explain it thoroughly because a lot of
for example the volume that is moved in
stock market indices futures contracts
comes from options market makers for
example but again we'll talk about this
later but it's important to identify
them as a specific market entity. And so
all of these are market participants
that engage in trading and investing and
in pouring money in opening trades,
buying and selling inside of financial
markets and they have different needs
and they're engaging in the market for
different reasons. And this makes us
move on to the next question which is
why do market participants interact in
the market? Well, it could be for
speculative purposes, for capital
preservation and growth or for hedging
purposes. So these are the main reasons
people trade in the market and the
reason why they take such a decision and
the analysis of why traders and
investors might act in a certain way in
the future is called fundamental
analysis. And fundamental analysis is
the analysis of the fundamentals. The
analysis of the nature of markets. So
for example, if someone is trading a
stock, the reason why he's buying that
stock, regardless of the purpose, for
example, why a rich person might want to
buy gold instead of keeping cash, for
example, for capital preservation and
growth purposes, might be for
macroeconomic reasons. So macroeconomics
is one type of fundamental analysis that
leads market participants to take
decisions. If the expectations on
inflation are going to be very high, you
would expect a lot of money flow from
all sorts of market participants inside
of gold because gold is the ultimate
inflation hedge asset or fundamental
analysis declines also in the real
fundamentals of each asset class. So
each market has different fundamentals,
different drivers that drive the flow of
money inside of that particular market.
For example, we just said gold as an
inflation hedge. Stocks, for example,
are driven mostly by in risk appetite.
Bonds, for example, are also used as a
hedge for inflation, but more of a way
to park money, but also used if an
investor wants a fixed income. So for
stock, for example, if Apple has a new
amazing CEO or something bad goes wrong
about the company, that will move price
because it will move the fundamentals of
the market. So the analysis of
fundamentals of each markets answers the
question why the perceived value of that
specific asset or asset class is
changing through time and is as a
consequence going to affect prices. So
as you become a trader it's going to be
very important for you to be
consistently finding reasonable answers
to why the perceived value of an asset
which is its fundamentals will drive
what ultimately moves which is price.
because prices will always be a
reflection of the market participants
opinion of what the fundamentals of that
assets are. So we understand that
financial market prices are moved by
market participants that act based on
what type of market participants they
are for different purposes and basing
their decision on fundamentals. So
fundamentals answer to the reason why
something might happen especially in
long-term price movements. For shorttime
price movement, it might be because of
execution alpha or market makers hedging
activity or some retail traders doing
some crazy stuff like what happened for
example in GameStop. Now how does all of
this happen? So let's answer the
question how how do market participants
move money for fundamental reasons that
move prices. But how does that happen?
This happens with a constant flow of buy
and sell order also known as supply and
demand that enters the market in the
form of order flow or volume. And supply
demands is a very easy concept to
understand. If there's more supply, if
there's a lot of a certain asset, the
prices are going to be low. For example,
water's price is decently low for most
people, but gold as it's rare and
there's less of it has a higher price,
right? Supply and demand. So in
financial markets, supply and demand
exists in the form of buy and sell
orders. And there's a constant flow of
buy and sell orders, which we call order
flow that we measure through something
called volume. So one stock traded from
a buyer and a seller that trade with
each other equals one volume. So volume
is literally the amount of transactions
that happen in the marketplace. And we
can analyze this flow of orders and we
can access through a data feed this
constant flow of buy and sell orders to
understand if there's any sort of
imbalance in the auction of these orders
because these are traded in a so-called
double auction which we'll get deep into
later. And the analysis of the market
based on this double auction mechanic is
also called the liquidity auction theory
or auction market theory which is what
we will use to analyze both volume and
price. And then we have the last two
questions which are relatively less
important but still important which is
where so in which markets is the money
flowing. The answer to this comes from
something called intermarket analysis.
So analyzing how certain markets perform
compared to others and understanding if
money is flowing out of a certain market
in which other market is it being poured
in and when can be anything related to
analyzing market cycles such as seasonal
analysis or intraday seasonals also
known as situational analysis. So by
answering the basic question of logical
analysis, we can understand what we need
to consider, what we need to study and
the main things we will need to study is
what moves, how it moves and why it
moves and then we can add where exactly
in which markets through intermarket
analysis and market cycles and when as
in cycles. One more thing that I forgot
to add is sentiment analysis which is
also something very crucial that is
multifaced. It's diverse and there's
many ways to do sentiment analysis but
it's basically the analysis of
participation. So seeing what's the
overall sentiment, see how different
market participants are participating in
different asset classes and you can you
know use instruments like retail
sentiment there's a lot of retail
sentiment tools that tells you what
retails are technically doing or
institutional sentiment with something
called a coot report etc etc or a lot of
people for example using Twitter analyze
the overall sentiment of traders around
the world. So to recap, what moves
prices? Price action. Who moves the
market? Market participants. Why do they
move the market? Because of decisions
they take based on speculative purposes,
hedging purposes, or capital
preservation for fundamental reasons
that can be due to macroeconomics,
single asset fundamentals, or market
sentiment. How do they move prices?
Through a constant flow of buy and sell
order, also known as order flow. So
through volume where do they do it in
different types of markets for different
reasons when do they do it in different
times of the year in different times of
the day in different times of the
macroeconomic cycle and in different
time of each day. So this is the
clearest framework you can have to
understand the basics of the markets.
Now before getting deep into the why
let's first understand the how. So
understanding how prices move through
what we call the liquidity auction
theory. And do you know what? I think
I'll just give you the whole map so you
can review it if you want. I'll send it
on my Telegram chat that you can find in
the description below. So the first step
of the liquidity auction theory is
market mechanics. So let's understand
that one first. This is the price
ladder. So lower prices, higher prices.
And let's say the current price is 100.
So as we know what drives price up and
down is supply and demand. So a constant
flow of buy and sell orders. And let's
see how these orders actually interact
because there's two types of orders. You
got sell orders at higher prices and you
got buy orders at lower prices. These
are called the bids. These are called
the offers. And let's imagine this is
the price for example of Bitcoin. Just
to make a relatable example for you
gamblers. And let's understand it at a
glance with this animated video. So
these are people offering to sell
Bitcoin. These are people offering to
buy Bitcoin at different prices. So
these are buy and sell offers. And this
is the first side of the liquidity.
These are also called the market makers.
This is passive liquidity. Imagine it
just like in an auction where they sell
paintings of a famous artist. Imagine
all of these being the goods being sold
at the auction being offered at the
auction. Price will not move if someone
in the audience will raise their hands
and says, "Hey, I am willing to pay a
higher price." But the difference is
there's not just things being sold.
There are also things being bought.
That's why we call the auction of of
financial markets a double auction
because it works both for price going up
and also for price going down. Now let's
put them all on this side. So if this is
the paintings of Dainci sold at the
auction then you have the auctioneer or
the middleman the guy with the little
hammer which is the matching algorithm
of for example the exchange in can be it
can be Coinbase or Binance or whatever.
For futures, it can be the CME. For
stocks, it can be the New York Stock
Exchange or whatever stock exchange.
Doesn't change. It works exactly the
same for all financial markets. So maybe
a guy named Fabio decides he wants to
buy market one of the one of these one
of these bitcoins that are being sold.
Which one will he take? Of course, the
one at the lowest price, which is 101.
Let's say he wants to buy three
bitcoins, right? So his order will be
sent from the broker to the matching
algorithms that through a first in first
out system will match it with this order
and this order because he needs to buy
three of them, right? So he will be able
to buy one here and two here. So these
will go here into the matching algorithm
and Fabio will be long three bitcoin,
one bitcoin from here and two bitcoin
from here. And so the current price from
here will move first here and then here.
So if there was a candle that opened
here, the the the candle will go first
here and then here. Now let's say now
let's say another person comes named
Patrick and he decides that they want to
sell Bitcoin. So he wants to sell for
Bitcoin. His order will be sent as well
to the matching algorithm that will try
to match that sell request with the best
possible price where there's at least a
buy offer. So he will buy three from
here out of those four and one will be
filled here. B. So all of these orders
that were filled are not going to be in
the order book anymore. Here we'll only
have three. One of them got here. And
now the price would have gone here and
then here cuz that's where the last
order got filled. The last match was
made. And so the candle will tick below,
turn red, and live a wick above where it
used to be because this is now the new
price. So as you see price is always
determined when an aggressive buyer or
an aggressive sellers choose to accept
any of the offers made in the order
book. So aggressors are the price mover
because because remember Fabio could
have just you know placed a buy offer
there without having to accept a
slightly a slightly worse price and he
could have just placed a buy limit at 98
instead of having to buy at worse
prices. He could have paid 98 for the
same thing he paid 102 for, but there
was no guarantee that a seller would
have accepted that offer, right? So, the
fact that he was not willing to wait,
but he was okay to pay a higher price, a
slightly higher price, that's why we
call it aggressive orders because
they're not waiting. They're kind of in
a FOMO. I I need to buy now and I am
willing to pay a slightly higher price.
I'm willing to pay something called the
spread, which is the difference between
the best ask and the best bid. This is
called spread. So whenever there's a low
level of liquidity between the bid and
ask, we say the book is thin because
there's not a lot of liquidity. And by
liquidity, we mean this. We mean orders
in the book. Someone who can be our
counterpart and makes it easy for us to
trade. So the second step of
understanding the liquidity auction
theory is the auction market theory and
as we have understood price are mostly
driven by big operators whales big banks
hedge funds institutions people with big
amounts of money and you understand that
for example if Fabio were to buy in the
previous example a thousand bitcoins he
would have to buy four here eight here
10 here and so on and so forth and
gradually ally accept really really
worse prices in order to to get that
thousand contracts thousand bitcoin
fail. So the first pillar of auction
market theory is that smart money
prefers slow and liquid markets because
they have such big orders they will
fraction them and instead of buying a
thousand contracts right away they will
buy them bit by bit. So you will see
often price stay in a situation of we
say consolidation where there's no a
clear direction of price and sometimes
yes price do but smart money prefers
slow and liquid markets. So they will
split their orders and slowly put them
into the market rather than having to
put them in the market all at once and
move price super super fast with one big
order. And this happens when the market
is agreeing on a price because the
aggressive selling pressure and the
aggressive buying pressure is pretty
even on both sides and it's creating a
situation of balance. So whenever price
is like this, we call this a balanced
market or a situation of fair value. And
what fair value means is is that since
the market is influencing prices through
buying and selling aggressive pressure
that's based on the value of the
underlying asset or the perceived future
value of the underlying asset. Both
aggressive sellers and aggressive buyers
are agreeing that this is a fair price
both to trade sell aggressively or buy
aggressively. Then this is where a smart
money prefers to trade. But then
something might change in the perception
of the future value of the underlying
asset that will drive aggressive buyers
to be ready to accept higher and higher
and higher prices as we saw in the book
because if this is the current price as
we said we have sell liquidity, sell
liquidity, sell liquidity, sell
liquidity, sell liquidity, right? So if
the value of the underlying asset is
such that aggressive buyers are ready to
pay a slightly higher price just to get
filled just to get their hands on that
asset that's what drives price up. So
for example the market will buy some
here some here some here some here some
here some here some here and every time
they buy some tuck tuck tuck tuck tuck
price goes up up up up but it's not like
buyer necessarily like this ideally they
would like to buy just here or even
lower without having to pay a higher
price every single time. So price going
up and accepting all of these sell after
is showing us is a search for liquidity.
They would hope that there's a huge
liquidity over here already ready to
sell back to all of this aggressive
buyers but there's none. There's not
enough liquidity. And so what's
basically happening is there is this
phase of imbalance or price discovery
which some people like to call fair
value gap which is a name that overall
I'd say makes sense because it's a not
exactly a gap but it's absence of fair
value because the market is not agreeing
that that's the fair valuation for that
asset and so this phase where aggressive
buyers are willing to accept higher
prices will eventually stop or at some
point they will find more resistance
from passive sellers and aggressive
sellers will start to consider these
prices fair as well because if they were
willing to sell here, they're probably
still willing to sell here even though
at not at the same rhythm as buyers. But
hey, if I were selling Bitcoin at 100, I
might also sell it at 110. And so as the
market starts considering these prices
to be fair again we will have another
situation of balance another situation
where both aggressive sellers and
aggressive buyers are agreeing that this
is a fair price to trade and sometimes
price will try and exit from fair value
and it will happen at times that price
breaks this situation of consolidation
and buyers start accepting higher prices
but sellers will still consider these to
these super premium prices to sell at.
So they will push the market back in a
situation of balance. Or it could happen
that sellers are considering these
prices to be very premium, very
convenient to sell at and they will
start pushing price down again out of
the balance. But the same buyers that
consider these prices to be fair are
likely to consider it again. So there's
a good chance they will push price back
into a situation of balance. And we call
these phases failed auctions. And this
is the most accurate model to analyze
market structure and price action
dynamics as well. Okay, let's say price
does this. What Charles Dao did in the
18th century was trying to analyze price
swings. So you would basically mark the
highs, the lows, the highs, the lows,
the highs, the lows of price. And in
order to assess a trend, you would see
where the highs and where the lows are
going. And if there's a higher high and
a higher low, we're clearly in an
uptrend. As soon as a higher low for
example gets broken then we understand
we are in a situation of a bearish
market environment [snorts] or bearish
market structure. Then since this model
presents itself a lot in the market,
people have tried to find again more
visual patterns just like the concepts
of highs and lows and highs and lows
because this is just visual references,
right? And because they repeat so often,
they've tried to predict it by finding
some shapes that are visually easy to
identify. For example, technical
analysts might define this as a pennant
or as a wedge or as a head and shoulder
pattern or a triangle pattern to find
again a type of wedge pattern. And so
people have tried for decades, for years
to find patterns in price and try and
see if they have any statistical
validity whatsoever, but they never
really proved it. But what all of these
are are failed attempts to rationalize
market structure just through price
without understanding the mechanics
behind it. But if we simply think of the
auction market theory model, we would
just define this as an area of fair
value followed by a phase of imbalance
and then another situation of fair value
where yes, at some point there have been
some failed attempts by sellers to
consider these fair prices and push
price lower followed by phases where
buyers are still considering these
prices to be cheap. So they push the
auction up until they eventually stop
and aggressive sellers take control of
the auction. But then again, you would
see a situation of fair value followed
by another situation of balance where
yes, you had some failed auctions
followed by a situation of imbalance
followed by a situation of balance and
so on and so forth. And by rationalizing
market mechanics in a way that we just
look at where money is agreeing and
where money is not agreeing, we can
easily follow where the money is flowing
in the market because ranges is where
the most money was traded. And so if
most of the money was traded here and
now most of the money was traded here,
we have an absolute objective indication
of where the money is going because as
we discussed in our model here is where
most of the time is spent. Most of the
big orders are slowly slowly put in the
market in fraction. We don't spend a lot
of time in these prices. But again we
spend a lot of time here. And here we
move on to the next step which is
volume. If we go back here and we
remember that three orders were matched
around here, four orders were matched
around there. So we had two contracts
traded here, one contract traded here
and then we had three contracts traded
here and then one contract traded here
again. The total amount of contracts, of
bitcoins, of stocks, of gold ounces,
whatever that is traded as every single
level of price is what we call the
volume profile. And the volume profile
shows you basically how much money was
traded at each level of price. And it
may sound obvious but if we had to draw
a volume profile of this whole price
action we would see that where there was
a lot of time spent that's the areas
where volume is really really high.
These areas are the areas where volume
was really really low. There was not a
lot of trading going on but then we
started spending a lot of time here and
this is where a lot of volume of trading
happened and maybe a little bit also
here and this makes you understand that
where the ranges are that's where the
money is and that when price ranges move
upwards that's where the money is
flowing. Now let's take a software like
deep charts and open a new book advanced
depth of market which basically means
exactly what we saw here the market
micro mechanics and for this example
we've selected the e- mini S&P 500 let's
zoom in and we can see exactly what we
just talked about and we can clearly see
in this column all the passive sell
orders in the ask column and here all
the buy limit orders or passive buy
orders in the bid and we can see how
They vary through time. So, for example,
we can activate the volume profile and
we're going to reset it to start from
scratch. And we can see that now the
price is here. That's where the volume
is being traded. For example, 15
contracts have been traded here. Now,
we're trading back here. And now we're
trading downwards. And you see how price
moves up and down depending on where the
volume is traded. Exactly as we said. So
for example, if I were a bank and I need
to buy a,000 contracts, I will have to
accept all of these offers and take 88,
96, 206, 83, 120, 90, 9090 and gradually
buy at worse and worse and worse and
worse and worse prices because that's
where sell offers are. Same thing if I
were to sell, there needs to be enough
liquidity. Now, let's just have this on
the side of the screen and have a normal
price chart on this side of the screen.
And if you look closely, you can
literally see how price moves ups and
down, up and down. And how candles are
created by volume being traded on the
ask or traded on the bid because of
aggressive buyers accepting sell offers
or aggressive sellers accepting these
buy offers. And you can see how now
someone accepted to purchase one of
these 65 64 and they've bought more all
up through here and a spike formed,
right? Because the candle has gone up
here and then down again. And these
movements happen because contracts are
traded upwards or downwards. This is how
the market works. No big deal, right? So
we understand that these are only
passive orders and there but they can
vary. These numbers change through time
because I could, for example, put a
bunch of buy limits here and then just
cancel them. So these aren't there to
stay necessarily. They just express an
intention, not an actual order getting
filled. This is a very different thing.
The that's why we call these passive
orders. The only orders that are
executed out of all of these are the
ones that you actually see traded in the
volume profile. Or if you go up here in
the indicators and you activate the
orderflow analyzer, you can basically
have a split version of the volume
profile where you see exactly how many
contracts were traded in the ask or in
the bid. So, if it was aggressive buyers
in green or aggressive sellers in
purple, this is called a footprint
chart, a deep candle, call it however
you like it, but it's basically showing
you how the candle was formed and a
summary of all the volume and all the
orders that either hit the bid in purple
or lifted the ask in green. Now, someone
is selling here, so price drops, someone
is buying again here. And all of this
data, by the way, comes from a data
feed. I'm currently using DX feed to
gather all of this very important data.
Now, I'm gonna disconnect it for a
second to show you how there's always
sellers one tick up and buyers one tick
down. Right? That's why if I zoom here
on a candle, you will see nine here, two
here, and then zero zero because these
two contract were bought here and these
nine contract were sold here. So when
you read this type of chart, the
footprint chart, you always read how the
auction unfolds diagonally because it's
always one tick up, one tick down, one
tick up, one tick down. This is what we
call an auction. And when you see also
here, also here you have 17 and two.
This was that auction. This was another
auction. This was another auction. This
was another auction. And you have zero
zero because technically here there
would also be a zero, right? Because
there's always buyers one tick down and
sellers one tick up. And that's how the
auction unfolds. So if I wanted to buy,
for example, I could buy submitted and
place a limit order and be here in the
order book or cancel
>> and simply buy. And if I click the buy
market button, I will get filled here
[snorts]
where there's at least a sell offer. So
if I buy, I click buy now.
>> Order filled.
>> You can clearly see I bought exactly
there. My order got filled here, which
is exactly that side of the auction. So,
I basically accepted a slightly higher
price, a 0.25 points higher price as
long as I could get my hands on a
seller, right? Cuz I didn't want to wait
until someone sold to me. If this
mechanism of the auction is not clear,
please rewatch it a lot of times until
you fully grasped and understood the
concept because we're going to need it
later. Now, let's reconnect to the data
feed.
>> Connected. price eventually went up and
a lot of buyers started stepping in and
I'm currently earning money in this.
This is just a demo account though and
for example I could put my take profit.
I could drag the takerit and as you can
see it's minus one limit
>> order submitted. It's a limit order,
right? Because I'm basically to close my
buy position, I have to sell, right? And
I have to sell at a higher price. So, I
can put a resting order, a sell limit as
my takerit as the area where I'm going
to close the trade. Now, I'm going to
put it here and see if I can order
submitted. Order submitted.
>> Put it slightly lower.
>> Order submitted. Order submitted. Order
submitted.
>> And now I'm out of the position. Let's
buy once more.
>> Order filled
>> and buy from the best ask. I can also
click on SL and what this will do is
placing a sell stop
>> order submitted.
>> So a sell order that will not stay in
the book but will simply get triggered
if price drops and I'm going to lose
basically $150 and cap my loss to a
maximum amount. That's a stop-loss,
right? You're probably familiar with it
already. But this stop order is not in
the book. It's only inside of my
platform and will be executed as a
market order because the only sell
limits that are allowed are above the
price. If I place a stop, it will be
executed like a sell market orders. It's
like I'm basically telling my platform,
hey, when price reaches this 6803.75,
execute my order at the best price, like
you were selling market. And this will
close my trade.
>> Order cancelled.
>> Or to close my position, I could simply
sell market. As you can see, I sold here
in this side of the auction. And with
this, the mechanism of the auction
should be clear for you. And we can move
on to a deeper level. Since markets
often go this way, they often go up one
tick, down one tick, up one tick, down
one tick, up one tick, down one tick,
and so on and so forth. As you see, it's
doing now. Constantly going up, down,
up, down, up, down, up, down. There are
some specialized firms that are called
marketmaking firms. And what they do is
exactly this. They always sell at the
best ask and they always sell the best
bid. So they always quote both the ask
and the bid to earn the uptick down tick
uptick down tick movement and earn the
spreads that traders pay. And this is a
massively profitable business model by
the way. And why this is so important is
because it helps us understand even
deeper the nature of the markets. So the
next thing we need to understand is the
different types of matching algorithms.
Now let's make the exact same example.
We have one contract in the bid and one
contract on the ask. Let's put it this
for the sake of this example. The first
type of matching algorithm is the first
in first out algorithm also known as
FIFO. This is the most common type of
matching algorithm in let's say most
exchanges. And how this works is if I
place a sell limit order here and then
someone else places it after me in a
chronological order even let's say it's
a bigger order then someone else put
another order and someone else puts
another order and the same thing happens
for example in the bid one more order
one more order the first order that was
placed here chronologically speaking so
the earlier you place an order the
earlier you're going to get filled so
even though you ultimately end up seeing
only one number. For example, hey, there
is five orders here. Okay, five
contracts and here you have six
contracts. So, slightly more. In the
normal order book, you will only see
this. But in the back, this could be six
different people that place one single
order. Or in this case, four different
people, one order, one order, two
orders, two orders, right? Or it could
be just one person placing six contracts
all at once. But what happens in the
background really is if a buyer comes
and buys one contract market, the
matching algorithm will match it with
the first sell order that was put in the
queue. So this order as it was the first
one to be placed here will be matched
with this buyer. That's why we call it
first in first out. The first order to
be placed in the queue will be the first
one to be filled. But this is not the
only type of matching algorithm. Another
form of matching algorithm is the FIFO
with LMM that stands for first in first
out with lead market maker and this is
slightly different. So in this model
there is a lead market maker. So a
market making firm that is both quoting
the ask and the bid and there's
basically an agreement between the
exchange let's say it's the CME the
Chicago Merkantile exchange and a
marketmaking firm let's say it's Citadel
Securities one of the biggest market
makers in the world and with this type
of relationship the market maker will
make sure to always provide liquidity to
the CME and the CME is happy because
because people want to trade there
because there's always someone to buy
from and someone to sell to aka the
market maker. This service is also
called liquidity provision. So the
market maker acts as a liquidity
provider for the CME. In exchange for
this service, the CME will grant the
market maker with different formulas,
but for example, let's say 40% of
aggressive volume. This way the market
maker can profitably run his business
and have some guaranteed flow of buyers
and sellers, buyers and sellers and
basically do like we just did and earn
from uptick down tick uptick down tick
uptick down tick and earn a spread. So
the market making business model is to
earn a spread. The business model of the
CME is to facilitate trading and the
goal of traders is to get filled at a
decent price and not pay a huge spread.
So if this matching algorithm is in
place and let's say that 10 buyarket
contracts are entering the market and
let's say this is our market maker
liquidity and let's say we have 10
orders here and some of them are placed
here by the market making firm. Well in
this case out of these 10 four of them
will be saved for the market maker and
six will be granted to the rest of the
market participants that place their
orders here. So in this case, even
though someone might have placed orders
here before market makers did, market
makers will still have a priority up
until 40% of the total aggressive volume
coming in the market. But there's only
one problem here. And let's get back to
our chart. What happens if let's say I
do this, I sell here and buy here,
right? If price happens to go the other
way, I'm losing money, right? Minus 12.
Let's see if price starts going to one
direction, right? Okay, now I just
earned some money. I'm going to sell
back again here. See, now price is
moving lower and I'm losing money as a
market maker and I'm again buying and
selling one tick, buying one tick down,
selling one tick up. If the market take
a clear aggressive direction, I will be
losing more and more money. And for
example, here I will be still buying
here and selling here. Right now, let's
do it again. Let's sell here and buy
here. And what a market making firms
looks like, it's actually like this,
right? This is the book of a market
making firm. It will always sell to the
ask, sell in the ask, buy in the bid and
up and down and up and down. Well, you
clearly understand if price suddenly
takes a very firm and constant
direction, you will sell, sell, sell,
sell, sell and keep losing money
basically. So the risk of a market maker
is that price will start going in one
direction without doing down ticks.
Because if it does this, this this the
market maker business is still
profitable, right? But if price just
goes tick tick up tick up tick up tick
up and without any tick down they don't
get a chance to close profitably their
position as you can see also it's
happening now I'm losing $62 now we got
very lucky because price is just going
up and down so market makers are now
happy whenever there's a flat action
they're happy now we're booking some of
that profit let's see yeah so what will
happen is the market makers will provide
liquidity under one condition only they
can not provide liquidity during
macroeconom economic data releases. This
is the only condition because when a new
macroeconomic data is released, let's
say for example, let's say for example
in 2021 inflation was a big problem and
the stock market was super bearish
because of fear of inflation. And if a
new inflation data came out and it was
suddenly really positive and inflation
was going lower, coming down more than
the market expected, it's very likely
that that the stock bulls will be happy
and keep buying, buying, buying, buying,
buying, buying. Well, who they're going
to buy from? are dear market makers
because if they're constantly quoting
all of the ask and suddenly they're all
bought, they're losing a lot of money.
So what they can do during macroeconomic
news release is basically delete all of
their orders. Okay, for example, let's
take the latest FOMC data release which
happened September 17th and let's see
what happened in the footprint chart
during that release. Well, you do see
something interesting here. See a lot of
zeros. A lot of zeros. What this means
and what this signals us that is
happening is there's a lot of buyers
accepting all of these sell offers even
though they're very little as you can
see and there's little to no aggressive
selling literally zero aggressive
selling. If market makers were to
constantly be the sellers of this
movement, they will be losing money all
the way through, right? And they do not
want to take that risk. That's why they
delete all of the liquidity. And I'm
going to share with you a clip now that
will make you exactly understand this
phenomena of spread widening. When a
news is released, such as NFP, CDI, or
FOMC, here's what's happening behind the
scenes. In every market, there's two
types of traders. Market makers in the
order book, buy and sell orders resting
above and below price, and market
takers, people actually buying and
selling to the best price. When a market
maker and a market taker agree on a
price and trade, that price becomes the
current market price. So a market making
firm will provide liquidity by placing
both buy and sell limits. So its
business model is to sell at a slightly
higher price and buy at a slightly lower
price from and to all traders who buy
and sell market to earn a spread. This
is a massively profitable business. But
if the market would start rising all of
a sudden, maybe because the Fed has
finally cut interest rates.
>> Good afternoon.
>> And stock bulls are happy for a market
maker, that means trouble because it
would have to keep selling at a higher
and higher price and lose a lot of
money. So to prevent this risk, market
making firms before any news release
have the ability to cancel all the
orders and stop providing liquidity for
some seconds. This way, the spread
between the best sell offer and the best
buy offer will be really wide. All it
takes is a buy market order which will
be matched with wherever there is at
least one sell offer. So price will
immediately jump wherever there was a
sell limit in a matter of milliseconds.
If someone in this time frame sells
market it will be matched with the first
buy offer which could be substantially
lower and in a matter of milliseconds
price will drop and just like that with
two very small order that can be a huge
volatility simply because of a lack of
liquidity from market makers.
So we have understood the basic of
market mechanics also in depth with how
the different types of matching
algorithms work and why since the market
works like an auction the liquidity
auction theory is the best model to
analyze market structure and basically
follow where the money is going and
instead of simply using highs and lows
as visual references or weird shapes
simply look at price with the lens of
volume and with the idea of following
the flow of big money. And this is what
we will ultimately do. We will try to
find the better ways to rationally
follow the big money by looking in real
time at the activity of buyers and
sellers through the footprint chart if
we are day traders or in general to
price action and volume if for example
we're swing traders. And this is what
we're going to talk about now in this
next chapter. But even before we get
into all of that good stuff and how do
we actually study the auction market
theory and find models to enter the
market for intraday setups for swing
setups I think it's important that we
clarify first what are the reason that
will push market participants to either
buy or sell through the matching
algorithm and all the liquidity auction
theory that we've modeled out and hence
causes price to move in such a way but
why so let's get a little bit deeper
into fundamental analysis and the first
element I want to address is
fundamentals themselves and every market
has its own fundamentals. For example,
one of the most famous market for sure
is the stock market and to understand
what moves the stock market, we need to
understand what the stock market is. And
the stock market is the market of stocks
which are shares of companies that are
listed in the stock exchange. So in the
stock market you basically trade company
shares and you can either trade single
stocks for example Apple, Microsoft,
Tesla, Nvidia and so you basically trade
by buying and selling stocks of the
single companies or you trade index
funds for example the S&P 500, the
Nasdaq, the Dow Jones or the Russell
where for example the S&P 500 holds
together every single stock the top 500
single stocks and by top 500 I mean the
500 00 stock with the highest market
capitalization or market cap of the
entire American stock market. The NASDAQ
100 takes the top 100 companies listed
at the NASDAQ. The Dow Jones Industrial
Average Index or Dow Jones 30 takes into
consideration only the top 30 companies
but mostly from the industrial sector
and the Russell 2000 takes for example
small cap stocks. So you have different
index funds that are composed of
slightly different companies and they
have a slightly different composition of
single stocks. And here is an example of
the entire S&P 500 visualized. This is a
graphics from visual capitalist. Shout
out to them. And in 2023 for example,
these are the different sectors. You
have the info technology sector. You
have the financial sector. So companies
like Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Adobe,
Salesforce, Intel, AMD are all tech
companies. Then you have for example
Fizer, Johnson and Johnson that are part
of the healthcare sector. In the
financial sector you have Birkshshire
Hathaways, JP Morgan, Mastercard, Visa.
Then you have the consumer discretionary
sector that includes stuff like Amazon,
Tesla, McDonald, Nike, Home Depot. And
they're considered consumer
discretionary because they're
discretionary. So they're not primary
goods such as, you know, food or water.
They're discretionary. Consumers don't
always buy from these companies. They're
secondary. Unlike, for example, consumer
staples like Proctor and Gamble,
Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Costco, Walmart,
Mundles, all of those companies that
sell staples, stuff that people buy all
the time. And this is already something
you can start understanding. These type
of stocks are more solid, more stable.
They pay dividends because they
constantly have revenue. While consumer
discretionary, for example, if the
economy is going good, they might
perform really well. But for example,
during a phase of recession, people will
care less about buying new stuff from
Amazon or eating outside at McDonald's
or buy a new pair of Nikes or buy a new
Tesla or even buy a new iPhone. But for
sure, they'll keep spending on consumer
staples. They'll they for sure do their
groceries at Walmart, do their groceries
at Proctor and Gamble. So consumer
staples for example is one of those
sectors that maybe has a better
performance during bare markets that are
mainly affecting consumer discretionary
sector and the infochnology sector.
Financials also normally are really
solid but if there's a financial crisis
this is the kind of sector that is going
to perform less or healthcare for
example is another really evergreen set
of stocks because there's always going
to be a need for healthcare whether the
economy is good or the economy is bad.
Then you have the energy sector which is
heavily influenced for example by oil
prices. You have materials, utilities,
real estate that for example is very
much affected by interest rate policies
decision because as you know most of the
real estate is bought through loans and
the interest rate you see in loans are
determined by the interest rates set by
central banks. So central bank decisions
on monetary policies will affect the
financial sector a lot and the real
estate a lot. And so you already start
understanding in general the different
types of sector how would they respond
to the economy but in general the stock
market the reason why it moves. So the
fundamental reasons one of the main
drivers of the stock market is risk
appetite. So in general the stock market
when you invest in a company so why an
investor a person with big money should
or shouldn't invest in a stock it is
typically because they expect the
company valuation and the price of that
stock to grow so for growth or because
for example it's a company that pays a
lot of dividends. For example, a company
like Tesla didn't pay dividends at all
to its investor, but it had an intense
growth in its price that generated a
return for investors, but it does not
pay dividends. Coca-Cola instead is a
company that pays a lot of dividends,
right? So another thing that influences
risk appetite so incentivizes investors
to put on capital into stocks and to
invest in the stock market or in some
specific stocks is expectations on the
company's earnings. And as of today,
every 3 months, all publicly traded
companies have to release their earnings
once every 3 months or quarterly because
earnings are both a driver of growth and
also earnings which for all of those who
don't know is simply revenue minus
expenses. So the net profit of the
company is the earnings is equally
divided and distributed to shareholders.
So if you bought a stock, you bought a
share and a lot of companies will pay
you earnings because you hold a share.
you're a shareholder. And so a lot of
investors might invest in a company for
income, not for growth, income. So
income/ dividends. So this is everything
that relates to the company itself,
right? And each company has its own
fundamentals. And by fundamentals, that
could mean for example, who is the
founder or the CEO of that company? How
trustworthy is him? How are the
financials of the company? So you
basically take the balance sheet of each
company and analyze their earnings,
their EIDA, their leverage ratio. So how
much in depth they are and their
financial solidity overall. Another
crucial thing is how how is the
sentiment of markets towards the sector
they operate in. These are all parts of
the fundamentals of the company. And of
course it's a part of the fundamentals
of the stock market in general.
everything that relates to the economy
they operate in or the macroeconomic
context. Of course, if the overall
economy is expecting to shrink
drastically, that's not going to help
stocks go high. It's going to decrease
the risk appetite and investors maybe
take money out of the stock market into
a safer type of asset. So, if the
macroeconomic content is overall good
and there's a positive sentiment about
the economy, the stocks tend to be
bullish. If there's likely to be a
recession, this is typically bearish.
But always remember, if during recession
stocks are bearish, doesn't mean that
that money is being lost or burned. Like
some newspaper like to say, trillions of
dollars burned in the stock market in a
single day. Yeah, but it doesn't burn.
It just moves somewhere else because
markets are just this money moving where
it thinks it will get a better
treatment. And the macroeconomic context
is heavily heavily influenced by
monetary policies which we'll get deep
into shortly and fiscal policies which
we'll also get deep into later. Now,
another important thing about the stock
market and the reason also why the stock
market is one of my favorite market to
trade and this is where I mostly trade
by the way. I mostly trade the S&P 500
is because it's in some sense more
predictable because we can truly
understand what the intentions of the
market are very very clearly much more
clearly than a lot of other markets I
would dare to say. And the main market
participants of the stock market are for
sure investors. investors who invest in
the stock market and they create an
upward bullish pressure by constantly
buying, buying, buying, buying, buying
and accumulating money into the stock
market for capital preservation and
capital growth reasons. And these are
long-term traders. They affect the
long-term direction of the stock market.
And as you can see in most big economies
since more money is being printed as we
will see later investors have more and
more money to invest in the stock market
and the market tends always to go up. So
the fact that there is investors creates
a skew in the probabilities of prices to
go up more than they go down most of the
time which is already in and of itself a
great edge already which is the reason
why simple trading setups like the
opening range breakout always works in
stocks. And then of course you have
speculators and speculators can affect
more let's say the short-term price
action and the short-term volatility.
And while investors might simply buy
stocks or investors often for example
buy/sell
ETFs of certain index funds or of some
specific sectors cuz for example each
one of these sectors of the S&P 500 has
its own ETF. speculators instead
together with just using single stocks
or trading ETFs. They will also use
derivative contracts such as futures of
index funds and I would say mostly
options and all of these are derivatives
but they are such huge markets that they
end up affecting the underlying asset
cuz you should know that a future an
option a CFD it's a derivative contracts
because it deres it price from the
underlying asset right but if most of
the volume is traded in future contracts
and in options the hedging activity or
the arbitrage that can happen between
different markets will affect the stock
prices itself. So [snorts] as you will
see later sometimes options especially
are the underlying asset themselves and
also both speculators and investors but
just the big ones trade in something
called dark pools especially single
stocks and dark pools are a different
type of exchange that is not transparent
is not regulated. It's not public, but
it's a private pool of institutional
liquidity where big investors, big money
participants can more comfortably trade
big amounts of money and trade in
blocks. Okay. And get a feel to their
so-called exactly block trades. And this
is a considerably big part of the
market. I'm not sure what's the current
volume overall, but at some point I'm
sure it was around 40%. And for the rest
of the market, there's also a lot of
calculations of where is the most money
traded in single stocks, in ETFs of the
index funds, in the futures of the index
funds or in the options of both stocks
and and index funds. And the answer is
options. Most of the market, most of the
public market of stocks and index funds
are not traded in ETFs, not in futures.
Most of the daily volume happens in
options, specifically zerodte options,
which became very popular in the last
few years for both retail traders and
institutional traders. And this leads us
to the third big market participant of
the stock market, which are market
makers or marketmaking firms, the same
ones we saw here like Citadel
Securities, which are market
participants that are basically
liquidity providers that earn a spread.
And the biggest one and most influential
ones are option market makers for sure
because as most of the notional volume
in the stock market is traded through
through options and specifically zero
DTE. The way market makers stay neutral
and basically hedge their position
creates a flow of hedging orders in the
futures market and in the stock market
that according to some estimate is
around 10% to 15% of the total volume
which is a lot. So hedging flows from
market makers specifically in the option
market are really considerable in
specifically the short-term market
action and we will get deep into that
later but I already want to show you
something which I consider very
interesting. Go on squeezemetrics
squeezemetrics.com and you get this
chart that basically has the S&P 500 but
you also get two very insightful
indicators. The first one is the DIX,
which which could be kind of a funny
name, but is the darkpool indicator or
dark index, which basically take
darkpool data from all of the stocks of
the S&P 500 and basically creates an
index of darkpool activity. So for free
on squeeze metrics, you can get a daily
recap of darkpool activity. And
typically whenever you see big peaks up
or down, they happen because some huge
market participants are whether buying a
lot of stocks or selling a lot of
stocks, which can be a crucial data
point because you understand that if
someone this big is joining the party or
quitting the party, then he might know
something you don't. And we might want
to be careful. It is not random that
these short peaks in the in the market
happen right before a big stock crash
and instead the high peaks happen right
before big bull runs. And this is one of
the indicators you get here. Another one
you get here which is very insightful is
the gam exposure. And the gam exposure
is to properly explain it. It takes a
little more knowledge on how options
work and we will do that in this video
because I truly want you to understand
it. But for now just know this. When the
gam exposure is in the purple level, we
typically expect volatility to compress
and when the gam exposure is in the
yellow area, we expect swings to be much
more volatile because of the hedging
flows of options market maker that I was
mentioning, but we'll get deep into how
that work later. Now, this is the chart
of the S&P 500 index or the S&P on
Trading View. Let's use the monthly
chart and set the chart on logarithmic
scale. Well, you can clearly see it has
a very clear direction. Let's put a line
chart and let's walk through a little
bit of the history behind it because
you're probably familiar with the stock
market bubble of 1929 and the following
stock market crash where the stock
market lost 85% of its value. This was a
clear example of a bare market
unfolding. a bare market where investors
who invested their money here basically
saw their value wiped out and had to
wait more than 20 years to see a profit.
But in general markets tend to go up and
sometimes a crash happens. This is the
crash of the '60s, the crash of 1966, of
1969 and the crash of the '7s. And
unlike the great recession of the 1930s,
all of these bare markets recovered
pretty quickly. And so the stock market
has this V-shaped reversals that happen
because people bought the dip, right?
Because we expect stocks to go high. And
when everyone panics, typically it's a
good time to buy. Another famous stock
market crash happened in 1987. In the
2000s because of the explosion of the
stock market.com bubble and then again
in 2008 during the housing crisis and
the great financial crisis. And then
other important bare markets happened in
2015. in 2018 and during COVID. Then we
had another bare market during the
inflation crisis of 2022. And the last
big buy the dip happened during the
Trump tariff war. And these are the main
things you need to know about the stock
market. And I would say the little
brother of the stock market is the
crypto market for sure because one of
the main drivers of crypto is risk
appetite. So in some way it is similar
to the stock market but it's completely
different because cryptocurrencies you
have the main one which is Bitcoin of
course which is a completely different
cryptocurrency for example than than
most of the other altcoin and the
drivers of cryptos are risk appetite and
purely growthbased. Some people might
say they are a valid alternative payment
method and for some things they are.
Some altcoins maybe could be better than
bitcoin as a payment method. Then you
have all the world of stable coins. And
for example, especially with Bitcoin, we
have seen a very consistent, even though
not always, but pretty consistent
correlation between the price of Bitcoin
and the price of stock indices such as
the S&P 500. They tend to move not the
same way, but a lot of the time they do
because of the fact that they're both
risk assets. But a lot of the investors
of Bitcoin or the traders of Bitcoin,
the holders or the hodlers truly believe
in Bitcoin. And so through time, Bitcoin
is likely to become not just a risky
asset, but treat it almost like a
digital form of gold, so a store of
value. Most altcoins, I would say 80% of
the altcoins are mostly attractive to
gamblers. And with altcoins, there's a
lot of insider trading. You could trade
them with market sentiment because the
cool thing about cryptos is they're more
transparent than most market thanks to
the blockchain which is mostly public.
So you can follow the trades of all
market participants, the big ones and
the small ones with a very high level of
detail and do the so-called onchain
analysis. And specifically with
altcoins, meme coins are the favorite
tool for pump and dump schemes from
scammers, influencers, and even
politicians at time where they pump
price up, they sell before anyone else
can, and then they lose all of their
value because they have no intrinsic
value whatsoever. So while with Bitcoin
and also other altcoins such as XRP or
even Ethereum, you could argue that
there is some level of intrinsic value,
with memecoins, it's just a pure
lottery. It's pure casino and some
people might get lucky, some people
might not. Or some people might be aware
that is a casino and place themselves
smartly on the right side. There's a lot
of successful traders of meme coins that
simply take advantage of the dump money
there and take smart decisions instead.
But this is not going to be part of this
course that we're doing. Even though for
more liquid cryptocurrencies like
Bitcoin, you could use roughly the same
models of the liquidity auction theory
because there's a lot of big
participants now involved and now ETFs
are involved and there is more and more
institutional interest in Bitcoin and it
will likely keep rising in the future.
But for sure this is a market worth
mentioning as one of the types of
financial markets. The next market is
the commodities market. for example,
oil, natural gas, or even water or
cocoa, coffee, live cattle, even orange
juice, wood, cotton, copper, lithium,
sugar, and so on and so forth. All of
these commodities of prime materials
that are used to then produce other
stuff. They're the basics to create
other products. We will not get deep
into every single one of them now
because it would be a very, very long
video. It's already pretty long. But
they mostly revolve around expectations
around supply and demand. These are the
main fundamentals of each market. So for
example for oil there are producers that
are the supply and the global industry
which is the demand. So for oil the
supply can be the OPEC plus countries.
Big producers is the US, Russia and
Canada. So the global supply is the
producers of oil. The demand is the
global industry as oil is used in every
possible industry whatsoever. So the
expectations around how much production
of oil there will be and how much demand
there will be because of for example how
well the global manufacturing industry
is likely to be active in producing new
stuff. These are the main drivers that
drive oil prices. And for example, we
have seen a lot of volatility in oil in
many instances throughout history where
there was a supply shock. So this is the
chart of oil. And for example, in 1973
during a war that exploded in the Middle
East that and remember this was a period
of time where most of the global oil
supply was Arab countries, Iran decided
to stop oil production and stop
supplying oil and that created not one
but two oil shocks where price simply
exploded creating if we take the
inflation rate and put it on top we can
see these two big waves of inflation
that were caused by this shock in the
prices of oil And this was all a supply
shock. Then also during ' 07 there was
this huge also speculative move in the
price of oil that then dropped
drastically because of the global
financial crisis where we would expect
the demand of oil to radically get
lower. Same thing happened during COVID
where all the world shut down. So the
expected demand of oil dropped
significantly and drove traders and
investors and hedggers to basically sell
oil and even go below zero at some point
because if everything's closed, there's
no transportation, there's no
production, that's a shock in the demand
of oil. So supply shocks and demand
shocks are the main driver. For example,
during 2021 2022, because of the war,
both oil prices and natural gas prices
had a huge supply shock. And that all
happened because of the expectations
around the supply and the demand of that
asset. The same thing happens with
natural gas with all of these for
example CCOA where when you see this you
could think this is basically a
cryptocurrency but what happened here
was a shock in prices caused by
unexpected weather condition in the
countries that are the highest producers
of cocoa and that drove prices up
significantly. And this is basically the
driver behind commodities. And the
participants of this market are big
companies that use these commodities to
produce and they are the demand usually
and big producers. And they are a big
part a big portion of the volume because
for example they hedge the risk of
prices increases suddenly through
futures contract which you know it's the
most common type of contract to trade
commodities in even though also here you
can find options, CFDs etc. But futures
are the main one. And the reason why
participants engage in trading
commodities is also because of hedging.
But also there's a lot of speculation.
So also you have big and small
speculator as one of the significant
participants in this market. But in
general, I would suggest you if you want
to be a commodities trader to study the
fundamentals of each market one by one.
Take your time and truly understand what
is influencing the supply and what is
influencing the demand. And of course
even here the constant and as you will
see it's the constant in all market is
macroeconomic conditions because if the
overall economy is going really slow oil
prices might fall and so on and so forth
and especially for stuff like oil global
international conflicts and geopolitical
dynamics are a huge influence. And the
next big important market is precious
metals such as gold and silver and they
are technically commodities but they
deserve a category of their own. And
together with the bond market and the
forex market before explaining you the
fundamentals I cannot explain you the
fundamentals of these markets without
explaining you how monetary policies
work and how money creation works. what
is inflation and laying down some basics
of macroeconomics. So the next step is
macroeconomics and one video is not
enough to properly explain you
everything there everything that someone
should know about macroeconomics but I
will try my best to summarize the best
and most crucial information for traders
specifically because the sentiment of
the market around macroeconomics is one
of the main drivers of all sorts of
markets. So, it's really important to
know if you want to become a
professional trader. When we're talking
about macroeconomics,
we mostly talk about the economics of
big systems such as nations or the
global economy. And whenever we're
talking about macroeconomics, when we
talk about the economy, we have what
exactly do we mean? How do we measure
how the macroeconomic landscape or the
current economic scenario the current
economic status let's say we imagine the
economy as being a person if a person is
healthy or unhealthy we have some key
metrics some data points that we need to
kind of connect to understand if a
person is healthy or not right the same
thing we do with an economy and the most
obvious metrics are GDP which is the
gross and by gross it doesn't mean it's
and disgusting. It means it's not net.
The gross domestic product and the gross
domestic product basically takes into
account how much in dollar terms a
nation is able to produce. What's the
output of the economy including how much
investment there is, expenses there are,
import, export, everything that relates
to the wealth that the nation was able
to output in a single year. Typically,
for example, now the GDP of the United
States is above $30 trillion. And other
important metrics in macroeconomics is
employment. And the current status of
employment in a nation can be understood
with something called the unemployment
rate, which is the percentage of the
labor force that is not currently
employed. Another important metric in
employment is job openings. So is there
new job offers being open? Because also
the employment works with supply and
demand, the supply being the workers and
the demand being the businesses asking
for labor. And another important metrics
for example is new monthly payrolls. So
were there new people employed this
month in an economy? And we can see this
for example in the US with the ADP
report or with the NFP, the non-farm
payrolls, right? The next important
metric is for sure inflation and the
current unemployment rate in the US is
around 4% which is not much. Anything
above 4% indicating a not so healthy
economy because if people has no jobs
they buy less. So consumer spending
declines, business revenues decline and
so businesses will have to lay off
workers which will bring this even
higher and bring more unemployment to
the nation for example. Right? So
probably since Kanes which is one of the
greatest economists of the last century
we've understood that achieving maximum
employment in a country and we keep
people spending money will make everyone
earn more money and have an overall
stable growth in the economy. The second
or third most important macroeconomical
metric in an economy is for sure
inflation. And what inflation is growth
in consumer prices. Let's say for
example a coffee now costs $5. If next
[snorts] year the prices of the same
coffee is $55,
that's a 1% increase in prices or a 1%
inflation rate for the prices of coffee,
right? And you have multiple metrics for
inflation. For example, in the US, and
we're mostly talking about the US
because it's the one with the most
amount of data and the amount of
transparency with economic data compared
to the rest of the world. We're not
saying it's perfect, but it's probably
the best one. We have different metrics
for inflation. The first and most famous
one is the CPI or the consumer price
index. And for example, I can look for
US CPI, United States consumer price
index. And I can clearly see that prices
mostly go up. Okay. And you can clearly
understand here if prices go up which
means that with $5 I was able to buy one
coffee. Now $5 are taking me 0.95
coffees. Right? So an increase in prices
means that the value of the money is
actually going lower. So actually if I
divide one by the US CPI, so one over
CPI, I get and maybe I put it in
percentage terms, I can see that over
the last 75 years, the US dollar lost
around 92% of its value. There's other
ways to calculate inflation. Another
pretty famous one and one of probably
the most realistic one is the PCE
or the personal consumption expenditures
which is a kind of more accurate
representation of inflation because
consumer prices just takes the prices of
apples, the prices of oranges and
averages out the overall inflation rate.
The personal consumption expenditure
instead takes into account the behavior
of consumers. So for example, if apples
are way more used by consumers and way
more common commonly bought by consumers
rather than oranges when then apples
will have a higher weight in the overall
calculation of the inflation rate. So
the personal consumption expenditures
takes into account consumer's behavior.
So it's a kind of more accurate
representation of how prices are
growing. But as you can see this is a
number, right? This is a number. This is
not a percentage term. Indeed, both the
CPI and the PCE are typically expressed
in yearoveryear
increase. So, how much did inflation
increase over the last year? By the way,
also the gross domestic product is
typically measured in year-over-year
growth rate. So, here we're talking
about the GDP growth rate yearover-year
or even quarter over quarter. And here
we talk about not inflation but the
inflation rate year-over-year or quarter
over quarter. In fact, if I write USI,
so US inflation rate R year over year, I
get this chart instead, which basically
is measuring the speed of US CPI. And as
you can see, the steepness of this blue
curve is pretty stable. It's not really
vertical, and the inflation rate is
here. But as soon as the speed of this
line rising goes higher here we measure
the speed basically the rate of change
of this particular economic data. So
when it rises fast the inflation rate is
high because it's comparing this to
maybe this. So one year prior and as
soon as prices tend to flatten you can
see the inflation rate goes down. And a
high inflation is typically very problem
problematic because it consumes wealth
especially from poor people especially
from the middle class especially from
consumers and it's very bad in the
economy. Typically an inflation around
2% is considered healthy because let's
say the GDP is growing by 2%. If the
economy grows by 2% it's fair to expect
an inflation rate of 2% because yes the
economy grows there's more money into
the economy more money has being spent
by consumers and if consumers spend
prices of goods gets higher. So if
inflation is driven by consumer spending
it's typically healthy and will stay
around a healthy range of 2%. But let's
say for example that oil prices in
suddenly increase. Look at what happens
to inflation. Yeah, that's exactly what
happens. And you can see a clear pattern
here, right? Boom in oil prices, big
wave of inflation. Boom in oil prices,
big wave of inflation again. And these
were the wars in the Middle East and the
oil shocks. And here you have oil prices
getting really low, inflation dropping
down, boom in oil prices, war in
Ukraine, inflation going up. These booms
of inflation did not come because of an
increased consumer spending but because
of global conflicts. So these are what
we also call hard data. But there is
also soft data. And soft data are mostly
surveys such as business sentiment
surveys such as the PMI, the purchasing
managers index, which basically tracks
how confident are businesses, how much
products or commodities they're
warehousing, if they're investing in new
productions, if they're hiring more
people, blah blah blah. And also talking
about businesses, another type of
inflation is the PPI, which is the
producers price index. So if the
consumer price index is based on prices
that consumers pay for while buying
groceries, while buying new car, buying
a new house, producer prices instead
measure the inflation that businesses
feel that businesses pay for. And
typically inflation will first hit
producers and then consumers. Because if
oil prices go up first, the businesses
will have higher costs for production
and then those higher costs will be
reflected into the consumer prices. So
if for example you add US PPI
year-over-year, you'll also tend to see
a pattern where typically producer
prices peak before consumer prices do,
they drop before they do, they rise
before these do. So they tend to have
some level of predictive effect
understandably. And now that we know the
main metrics of an economy, there's way
more by the way. I'm just summarizing
the most important ones. We now need to
understand macroeconomic cycles. Now, in
order to understand the macroeconomic
cycles, we first need to understand how
money is created. Right? In the early
stages of our civilization, people used
to trade goods and services in exchange
for goods and services. So, hey, here I
have five apples. Give me 10 potatoes in
exchange. And they would exchange this.
Then this thing evolved to exchanging
goods for some more measurable units of
some stuff to make trade easier. For
example, pounds of rice or pounds of
salt. Something measurable that is easy
to use as a currency to buy from others
goods and services. And then they
started using coins made of precious
metals such as gold, silver, copper,
because they were a much more easily
measurable unit. So if I want to buy two
oranges, that's going to cost you three
coins. And so precious metals became the
currency. But then carrying around huge
amounts of gold became sort of
dangerous, right? So Jewish people
invented banks, places which basically
said, "Hey, we are going to keep your
money safe." So people started
depositing gold into banks and in
exchange for the gold, the bank would
release something known as a bank note.
the note of the bank. It was basically
an I an I owe you. So whenever you want
your gold back, you just give me back
this bank note. I know it's yours and
I'll give you your coins, your gold
coins back. But then since banks started
having a lot of money that was sitting
there for no reason and they realized
that people were not often coming and
picking all of that money up, they used
to keep it there as savings. So they
started thinking, hey, it doesn't make
sense that I keep all of this money. I
can start for example lending it and
earn an interest rates and only keep in
the bank what I am confidently sure
people will come and ask for for their
daily expenses and the rest of the money
I will just put it to work and basically
lend it to someone else. And gradually
banks started issuing more bank notes
even though they did not really have all
of that gold to back all of those
banknotes because they just cared of
earning an interest rate counting
counting on the fact that the money then
would be given back. And this is the way
fractional reserve banking was born. And
up until 1971, you could still somewhat
exchange your bank notes for gold at any
bank. This era was called the gold
standard. You could exchange your money
for gold or silver. But gradually
throughout the 20th century,
specifically 1971, the world decided to
abandon the gold standard and decide
that money itself was the currency even
though it was not backed by gold. And
that was the birth of the fiat currency
system. And fiat is a Latin word that
means faith. That's why it's also called
fiduciary currency because we all trust
that these dollars or euros or yens have
intrinsic value because we all agree on
it. But they're just pieces of paper.
They don't really have value. They have
value because we all have faith in it in
its value. We trust the value of money
because other people will accept it to
exchange for goods and services. It
started even earlier but in 1971 when it
really became the only way of creating
new money. Money was not created through
gold. money was not created through
anything to back it up other than debt.
So for example, a government would go to
the central bank and the central bank is
in charge of printing money and deciding
monetary policy. The government would
issue a IOU or a debt security also
known as a government bond for let's say
$100,000 and the central bank will print
$100,000 lend it to the government. The
government will give the bond to the
central bank will pay an interest on
this loan basically to the central bank
and lastly give the money back. The debt
doesn't exist anymore and also the money
is canceled basically. Or with a normal
bank a person who needs money will ask
for a loan. The bank will create money
out of thin air, loan it to the person
that will have a debt that will owe a
debt to the bank, will pay an interest
to the bank, and then give the money
back. The money is canceled, the debt
doesn't exist anymore, and the bank has
earned interest rates. And that's how
money is created. Money is created in
central banks and in the commercial
banks out of thin air through the debt
system. And because this system is in
place, new money is created through
debt. And since a debt will have to be
repaid, we have cycles in the economy.
Because if now I can spend this, but
through debt, I'm able to spend more. So
because of debt, at first I can spend
more than I earn, but then I'll have to
use part of my earnings to give back and
to pay the debt. So I will have to spend
less. And this cycle of a lot of
spending at first, a lot of wealth and
perceived wellness at first will result
later in having to spend less blah blah
blah. And this does not happen just to
people. It happens to the economy
overall. So if we plot on a chart the
GDP of a nation through time in an
economy without debt, the only way to
increase GDP, which basically means to
increase productivity, is with
technological innovation. And for
example with a strong demography. So if
technological innovation and strong
demography contributes to an increase in
productivity that's what we call
structural growth because there's more
people working and we can increase the
production increase productivity and
increase the economic output in a
system. But through the debt system, I
can input more money, more gasoline into
the economy and basically the economy
can grow at a much higher pace at least
at first because people and businesses
and governments will ha will ask for
loans and they will be able to spend
more and that will increase the economic
activity and the economic output because
if we have more money we can make more
stuff, people can spend more and the GDP
grows and this is called a leveraged
growth because it's growing through the
leverage of debt. But at some point
businesses, individuals and governments
will have to pay back that loan. And so
there will be a phase that in economy is
called deleveraging. And then at some
point people will start getting into
debt a little more and that will fuel a
new phase of leverage growth followed by
a phase of deleveraging. And we create
cycles in the economy. The stages where
the economy grows are also called
expansions that is normally followed by
a slowdown until we reach a peak
followed by a phase of contraction and
then a phase of recession. For example,
this is the chart of the GDP of the USA.
And you can see there's been some
instances of cycles, but it still tend
to go up, right? In 2008, we had a clear
example of deleveraging just like the
one we had in 1989. Pretty similar. And
there is two cycles. This is called the
big cycle that happens every 75 to 100
years. And then you have smaller inner
cycles of ups and down in the economy.
These are the shortterm debt cycles. And
especially the short-term debt cycles
are basically driven by central banks
and their monetary policies. And central
banks basically manage monetary policy
including interest rates and open market
operations such as quantitative easing
or tightening. I will explain them now
but just know first that they use
monetary policies to keep stable prices
aka an inflation rate below 2% and keep
maximum employment which means a low
unemployment rate. even though they
don't have a specific target. Anything
above 4% 5% can start to be a little too
much for an economy like the US right
now. So in their constitution their goal
needs to be st price stability and
maximum employment inflation rate below
2% and low unemployment. And how they
manage to do this is by playing with
these two things interest rate decisions
and open market operations. But before
we dive in deep into interest rates,
just know this video is taking me days
to make and it's taken me years to learn
all of this stuff. So, I would
appreciate you to leave a like to help
me out with the algorithm. Now, what are
interest rates? Well, we all know
interest rates. For example, if you ask
a loan to a bank, they will, let's say,
loan you $100,000 plus 5% interest rate,
which means on those 100,000, every year
you have to pay 5%. Which means that on
those $100,000 loan you take, you have
to pay 5% annual interest rate on that
100,000, which for example in one year
is going to be $5,000, right? But
specifically the interest rates that the
central banks are setting, they are
overnight interest rates on interbank
deposits specifically. So for example,
you have bank A, you have bank B and
then you have the Fed, the Federal
Reserve, which is the central bank of
the United States. So why is it
overnight interest rates on interbank
deposits? Because basically sometimes
bank A at the end of the day might have
some extra cash, some extra reserves. So
he will basically loan that deposit to
bank B overnight. So the interest rate
at which this transaction happen is
always within a range defined by the
Federal Reserve. In this case, they're
called the federal funds rates. And the
same thing happen if for example the
banks are choosing to deposit that money
overnight to the Federal Reserve and the
Federal Reserve will pay these banks an
interest rate. This is also called the
IORB or interest on reserve balances or
it can also happen the Federal Reserve
will lend some reserves of cash to bank
A or bank B and then the bank will have
to pay the discount rate and these are
typically on a range of 0.25 basis
points. For example, the target federal
fund rates could be between 4 and 4.25%.
So the Federal Reserve sets the target
of the interbank federal fund rates. So
interest rates that banks make between
each other somewhere in between the
discount rate and the interest on
reserves. And if I open the Fed funds
chart, this is the history of the
Federal Reserve interest rates. And as
you can see during the last year, for
example, during COVID, they dropped them
significantly up to the point where it
was zero. And then when inflation came
up after the COVID, they rose interest
rates. This is also known as the hiking
cycles where they hike rates. And now
we're in a phase of lowering interest
rates. And as you can see, this happens
in cycles. Similar to what we said are
the economic cycles that the economy
goes through. And the Fed decides to
either hike or cut interest rates for
one main reason, which is to incentivize
access to credit. So they cut interest
rates to incentivize access to credit.
This way if the target rates of the
federal fund rates are at 0% if an
individual goes to the bank and asks for
a loan, the interest rates on this loan
will likely be closer to 0%. While if
the interest rates are high, this is
disincentivizing people to ask for
loans. So since the interest rates are
high, it's less convenient to ask for a
loan if the interest rates are are at
5%. rather than 0%. And at the end of
the day, the federal fund rates or any
central bank's interest rates are
nothing more than the cost of creating
new money. Because as we said, whenever
there's a loan, new money is created. So
following its dual mandate to keep
stable prices and maximum employment, we
can already understand that if inflation
is super high because people are
spending a lot, maybe hiking interest
rates will disincentivize people to ask
for loans. they will consume less, they
will buy less, the overall economic
activity will be shrunk and this can
lead to a drop in inflation. Or if their
goal is to keep maximum employment and
suddenly the unemployment rises because
there's a recession coming in, the
central bank might drop interest rate so
that people are more incentivized to
leverage and take on new loans. More
money will be created. So there will be
an expansion in the money supply. Hence
in the economy as well, companies will
start hiring more and the unemployment
rate will go down again. Let's view that
in a cycle. Let's draw our GDP chart in
our macro cycle and let's say we are
just coming out of a period of
recession. At this point in this period
of time, it's very likely that the
employment is low or the unemployment is
really high. People don't have a lot of
jobs. The economy is [ __ ] So the Fed
will intervene by lowering interest
rates. This will cause economic activity
to pick up and eventually to expand
because people take on more debt blah
blah blah and the economy grows, right?
But it can come up to a point where the
economy is doing so good that inflation
starts being the problem instead. And
when inflation start being the problem,
that's where they hike interest rates.
And that will typically slow down
economic activity because people will
have less loans. The cost of previous
debt will rise and that will lead to a
contraction in economic activity. and
sometimes to a recession. And the second
thing they can do is so-called open
market operation or quantitative
tightening or easing. And this is a more
complicated mechanism that is often not
understood when studying monetary
policies. Most people would just call
this money printing, but it's not that
easy. But in order to understand how
open market operations work, we need to
first understand how a balance sheet
works. For example, if you go here and
you write WCL,
you have the balance sheet of the
Federal Reserve Bank. And you can see
that their balance sheet is sometimes
expanding, sometimes contracting,
sometime expanding, sometimes
contracting, sometime huge expansions
followed by a contraction. So you also
see this idea of a cycle here, right?
But let's first understand what it is.
The balance sheet of let's say a
company. It's basically a summary an
accounting sheet of all the company's
assets and liabilities and that
basically helps us understand the
financial situation of the company.
Typically in the assets you will have if
they have for example any machinery or
some intellectual property rights for
example trademark or patents or lands
any type of assets or maybe software
that's part of their assets. And let's
say for example this amounts to $1,000.
And then you have cash which is an
asset. You have bank accounts balances.
So bank balances and other forms of cash
for a total of let's say $500. And on
the liabilities side you have capital
contributions from the owner who for
example he is the one who have bought
the machinery have the IP rights and
owns the software. So that's the $1,000.
Then in the liabilities you typically
have the profit which could be let's say
$200 and also debt. And let's say the
company has a debt of $300 because maybe
out of those $500 they have in cash,
200s comes from the profit that the
company made that year. And that profit
is in the liabilities because it's
actually money that has to be given back
to the owner through dividends. The
capital contribution is some sort of a
debt to the owner himself. And the debt
is simply a debt to someone else, maybe
a bank or an investor. But the point is
assets and liabilities always balance.
So, you're always going to have $1,500
here and $1,500 here. And for example,
when you do the fundamental analysis of
a stock, you typically take a look at
the composition of the balance sheet.
How much of that is debt, how much is
capital contribution, how much liquidity
they have compared to how much debt they
have. And so this thing called balance
sheet is basically a summary of the
financial situation of the company. And
the total assets is always evening out
with the total liabilities. Let's do now
the balance sheet of a bank. A balance
sheet of a bank will look something like
this. You will have reserves of
liquidity or cash for let's say a
th00and loans to businesses or to
individuals. So basically money that
other people owns the bank which is a
credit for the bank. So it goes into the
assets and for example they will have
securities such as bonds, stocks and so
on for let's say another $1,000 and the
total will be $3,000. And in the
liabilities instead they will have of
course the owner's equity. So the
capital of the owner can who for example
can be $15 $1,500. And then they have
all the deposits from people and from
businesses. All the money that they are
holding in the bank for other people or
for other businesses that is basically a
debt to everyone else, right? The money
they hold for other people. And let's
say that's also 1,500. And also here the
balance checks out 3,000 3,000. Now
let's see the balance sheet of the
Federal Reserve or the central bank.
This is the central bank's balance
sheet. It can be for example the Federal
Reserve banks. And typically in their
assets you will see securities mostly in
the form of government bonds. As you
remember a bond is basically an IOU a
debt that the government has and it's
part of their assets because the
government owes the money that it's
written on those bonds. Right? Then in
the asset class they have loans. So
money or reserves that they have loaned
to let's say banks they will have
typically some reserves of foreign
exchange currencies that sometimes
central banks use to influence the forex
market and kind of rebalance the
exchange rates at times. And then they
have gold reserves which is something
that central banks in the last few years
have been absolutely hungry about. In
the liabilities they have money
specifically currency so banknotes and
coins that are circulating in the
economy. They all come from the Federal
Reserve Bank. Then at times they have
something called the reverse repo
facility which we'll not get deep into
now. And then they hold the bank account
for the government. So the US Treasury
general account which you can also find
on Trading View. For example, if you
write Wre Gen Treasury General Account
and this is basically the current bank
account of the government at the Federal
Reserve. And then they have bank reserve
balances. Remember when I told you that
a bank deposits some bank reserves, some
liquidity, some cash at the Federal
Reserve? Well, that's it. So now you
have understood what is a balance sheet.
What's the composition for example of a
company balance sheet versus a bank's
balance sheet versus the central bank's
balance sheet. But how does this help us
into understanding how this WCL
is typically used in cycles of expansion
of the balance sheet and contraction of
the balance sheet? expansion and
contraction, also known as QE or
quantitative easing or QT, quantitative
tightening. In order to properly
understand that, we need to add another
concept into our map, a crucial concept
called interbank liquidity. Let's get
back to our initial drawing of a normal
bank loaning money to an individual.
Now, let's say this dude has $100,000
and deposits this money into his
checking account or savings account.
Now, by law, the bank is only required
to keep 2% of this money as reserve. So,
for example, $2,000 as a reserve and
basically use that 98,000
remaining to loan it out to some other
person that might need it. But these 98
are not actually taken from this guy's
money. They're basically created out of
thin air as soon as someone decides to
take it as a loan. So whenever someone
comes and asks a loan to a bank, the
bank will create new money out of thin
air based on based on the fact that they
just need a 2% reserve. This mechanism
is also called the fractional reserve
system. Then let's say this person takes
a loan take these 9 $98,000 and then
redeposits this money into the bank in
his bank account. Now, the bank will
only have to keep 2% of 98% which is
exactly $1,960
as a 2% reserve. The remaining money,
which is $96,40,
can be used as a loan to other
customers. That will again redeposit the
money and the cycle could continue
endlessly. And out of those $100,000
that initially were deposited into the
bank, a lot of new money can be created.
And of course this creates an expansion
of the overall money supply and this is
how new money basically is created in
the banking system in the private
banking system. But some of it stays
there this fractional reserve and they
keep only 2% because on average out of
all of the deposits that all of these
people made 2% is what is statistically
required if people goes to the bank and
for example withdraw some money at the
ATM let's say $100. So that 2% is only
there to make up for people going into
the ATM and withdrawing some of their
money. But if all of a sudden all of the
people went to the bank and wanted to
withdraw all of their money, they will
quickly find out that the bank does not
have it. This typically does not happen
very often, but when it happens, it can
create a great distress in the financial
system. This is for example what
happened in 2008 during the great
financial crisis. It's also what almost
happened in 2023 during the regional
bank crisis. So these bank reserves are
exactly what we saw here in the
liabilities of the balance sheet at the
Federal Reserve Bank. And so what
happened for example during 2008 is that
all of these people started asking money
to the banks but the banks only had some
reserves, some deposits and then they
had some securities. So they had some
assets such as bonds, such as stocks and
such as for example MBS's or mortgage
back securities. In the 2008 financial
crisis, it became clear that in the
average balance sheet of a bank, these
securities were not liquid enough, were
not high quality enough to eventually be
liquidated and sold back to the market
in case they needed to face a high
volume of withdrawals and run out of
reserves. So in 2008 a new law came to
life that required the banks to have a
better liquidity coverage ratio. So
basically this new rule, this new law on
the liquidity coverage ratio basically
meant that the reserve of highly liquid
high quality so with a good credit
rating assets or securities the ratio
between this part of the balance sheet
of a bank and the expected and the
expected outflow of cash in the next 30
days based on a stress test should be
equal or above 100%. And by reserve of
highly liquid assets or highquality
assets, we basically mean cash, central
bank reserves, government bonds or other
forms of bonds such as qualifying
corporate bonds rated AA minus or
higher. So even corporate bonds but with
a high credit rating based on the Basil
3 international framework. The total
amount of these assets should be equal
or more than 100% of the expected cash
flow in the next 30 days. This way, if
people start suddenly asking for all of
their money, the banks can quickly
liquidate some of their bonds, some of
their stocks, and eventually use some of
their reserves to let people withdraw
their money and not create a stress in
the financial system. But as we said in
2008 this was not there basically and
that's why the first really big
expansion in the Federal Reserve balance
sheet happened exactly the first great
quantitative easing movement happened
exactly in '08 during the financial
crisis. Another big boom, not a gradual
rise up, a big boom happened during the
COVID crash. And there was a little bump
that happened right when we were about
to see a regional banking crisis. And
all of these huge open market operations
that the Federal Reserve has implemented
was for example because of this type of
situation where there was a high
distress in the financial system. And so
what the central bank did was to
basically being a net purchaser of
government bonds so that the banks could
easily liquidate some of those
securities, sell it to the central banks
that would print bank reserves to pay
for these bonds so that the banks could
have enough reserves to let their
customers withdraw and being overall
financially stable. So what quantitative
easing does really is not printing money
is printing new bank reserve balances to
basically purchase bonds from the
interbank market to give banks more
reserves. So new bank reserves also
known as interbank liquidity is this.
That's it. So in phases of quantitative
easing the central bank is flooding the
market with liquidity with bank reserves
and purchasing government bonds. And the
opposite happens during quantitative
tightening where interbank liquidity and
reserves are not a problem anymore.
They're not in stress anymore. And so
the central bank is shrinking their
balance sheet instead. And there's also
two important phases. The quantitative
easing before it moves to quantitative
tightening. It has some sort of
slowdown. That's when we talk about
tapering because they taper the
quantitative easing. They slow it down.
or after a phase of quantitative
tightening they slow down and that's
also called a phase of tapering. So they
slow down the sales of these bonds. So
open market operation in general are
used to lubricate the financial system
to keep it liquid and to suppress bond
volatility. This is for example what
happened here during the COVID crash.
There was a huge problem in the
liquidity of government bonds and the
Federal Reserve stepped in and purchased
awful amount of government bonds that
basically no one wanted to buy to
suppress the volatility of the bond
market. So if interest rate, we could
say they have a more direct impact on
the economy. Open market operation,
quantitative easing and quantitative
tightening, they have an effect that is
more direct to the financial system to
be able to support the economy. So now
you've basically understood the core of
literally how money works from who
prints it to who manages it to who
actually gets it. So how do we
contextualize what we've learned now to
understand and possibly predict where is
the macroeconomic cycle going to go and
how is that going to affect all of the
different markets fundamentals so that
we can read them through the liquidity
auction theory with a macroeconomic
context. You could imagine, for example,
the economy as a car with Jerome Powell
driving and it has one foot on the
accelerator and one foot on the brake.
And let's say we're coming out from a
phase of recession. Typically, the
unemployment is up. Inflation is
typically low and the central bank at
this point typically cuts interest rates
very aggressively to stimulate the
economy and at the same time to
lubricate the financial system and
provide liquidity to the bond market.
They will also start quote unquote to
print money and expand their balance
sheet. So this is the balance sheet.
These are the interest rates in yellow.
We have inflation in blue and
unemployment in red. These are the two
economic metrics that the Federal
Reserve is taking care of. And these are
the two tools of monetary policies they
have. So because inflation is not a
problem, they have to deal with
unemployment and the fact that the
economy is really struggling. So in
order to make it pick it up, they will
lower interest rates. So people will be
more incentivized to take loans. So
people will take loans to invest in
their business to buy a car to buy a new
house which means that people will spend
more. The companies will earn more money
and they will be able to invest more for
example in hiring new people and this
can take the unemployment down and the
Federal Reserve is happy. So the economy
overall catches up. Typically the bank
will keep the interest rates sort of low
in this period and will sort of keep
this money printing this bank reserve
printing to facilitate the bond market
overall and it's likely that at some
point because of all this rising
economic activity people will buy more
stuff and stuff will hence cost more. So
inflation will start picking back up
slowly and whenever unemployment is not
a problem anymore because everything's
fine, everyone has a job, there's a 3%
unemployment, but then inflation start
rising. We're typically very close to
the peak of the cycle. The central banks
will have to hike interest rates because
now its problem is starting to be
inflation instead. Now employment is not
a problem anymore, but inflation is. So
because of overheat in the economy, the
prices start rising or maybe god forbids
a war starts in the Middle East and oil
prices explode up and so inflation
explodes as well. At this point, they
will hike interest rates and basically
tighten the economic conditions because
people will have higher interest rates
to pay on their loans. They will be less
incentivized to take on more debt. And
at the same time they will likely slow
down this expansion of the balance sheet
and slowly start printing less and less
bank reserves and actually start
shrinking their balance sheet. Normally
in history most of the times we've seen
a hiking cycle of the interest rates. We
have also seen some form of contraction
in the economy. This happens typically
after inflation has cooled down. But
this will slowly bring unemployment up.
And if we do indeed get into a state of
recession where the economy is really
really suffering and employment becomes
a problem again while inflation is not
anymore. That's where the cycle will
invert again and central banks will
start cutting rates very quickly and
start printing money again. This way the
economy can slowly rise back up and the
cycle continues. Now, let's take a look
at some historical examples by looking
at the S&P 500 and adding the Fed funds
rate, the inflation rate, and the
unemployment rate to truly see what
exactly happened. Let's use the same
colors we used in the drawing. Let's
start whenever we have a decent amount
of data. We see for example that in 1957
after a slow but sure rate hike because
of inflation starting to picking up and
reaching about 4%. After this rate hike
we had a burst in unemployment. So the
Federal Reserve decided to cut interest
rates. In the meantime inflation was not
a problem anymore. They kept rates low
and as soon as the unemployment rate was
not a problem anymore they slowly hiked
rates. Something similar happened in the
late60s when inflation picked up. So the
bank hiked interest rates and that
caused another recession and we see it
from the unemployment quickly going up,
inflation dumping down because of slower
economic activity. Hence the Federal
Reserves lowers interest rates again.
Then unemployment starts not being a
problem anymore, but inflation picks up
again and so the Fed hikes rates once
more and the inflation rate this time is
really really bad. So they hike interest
rates really really fast and that causes
another recession. Unemployment picking
up and because of this while
unemployment is picking up inflation
rate goes down because people don't
spend. So the prices of stuff goes lower
and they can afford to lower interest
rates instead. Keep them low for a
decent period of time to let all of this
recession to kind of cool off. And as
soon as the unemployment rate is not a
problem anymore, but inflation start to
picks up again. Boom. You have another
hiking cycle. After this other hiking
cycle, they had to drop rates because
they caused another recession and prices
dropping, but they didn't drop as fast
as they imagined. So, they had to rehike
interest rates, cause another recession,
and then prices eventually calmed down.
This was a big mess in the 1980s. A new
hiking rate happened during a new rise
in inflation in the 80s and the '90s,
and this hike again caused a new
recession with unemployment starting to
pick up. So the Fed had to cut interest
rates all over again, keep them pretty
low. Inflation was pretty much stable.
The unemployment rate was gradually
getting lower. Interest rates were
pretty much stable overall. And after a
hike, inflation started picking up
again. So the Fed hiked [snorts]
interest rates again. And that caused
another recession. This also happened in
this also happened at the same times
with a stock market bubble and then
again slowly inflation starting picking
up. So they hike interest rates and
boom, welcome to the 2008 financial
crisis. Big unemployment. So they cut
rates drastically. Inflation goes down.
And as soon as this is not a problem
anymore, they can finally start to
slowly rise interest rate again. So a
new hiking cycle begins. And here we
have the highest peak in history because
of COVID. So the Fed cuts interest
rates. Then unemployment is not a
problem anymore. Inflation picks back
up. So the Fed has to hike rates again.
then inflation is not a problem anymore.
Employment starts to be worrying the Fed
a little bit. So they start cutting
interest rates. So this is a cycle that
repeats eternally. And if you plot the
S&P 500 here, you will see that
financial markets feel this very deeply.
We typically see during hiking cycles a
lot of bare markets. For example, new
hiking cycle, the stock market drops
because it expects a recession that
after materializes. And again here new
hiking cycle stock market crash
recession coming again in the 80s quick
hiking cycles bare market again during a
new recession new hiking cycle.com
bubble burst recession new hiking cycle
market expects a recession which then
materializes same thing happened over
here during COVID. So you kind of start
understanding how the money flows in and
out of the stock market based based on
in which part of the economic cycle we
are. Or to be even more accurate, if
this is the representation of the cycle,
the stock market will try to anticipate
what the economy will do typically with
a time window of 6 to9 months. Because
all of the economic data that builds the
cycle is somewhat lagging because it's
coming month after month, quarter after
quarter. the market will try to place a
bet based on every single data point
from employment, inflation and for
example price in a recession before the
recession actually materializes. And
this is probably the most important
thing you need to understand when you
want to analyze or trade the market and
join long-term money flow trends based
on macro. You need to understand that
there's this lag and the markets are
very efficient behind the markets.
There's people with degrees in
macroeconomics. They have crazy
predictive models which sometimes work,
sometimes don't. So when we're starting
to study the macroeconomic cycles, this
is just one piece of the puzzle because
often times the data point that build
the current cycle might point towards
somewhere and sometimes financial
markets might go in a direction that
seem completely irrational and is not
actually matching your macro view. But
you have to understand that whoever is
placing billions of dollars might be
smarter than you and actually understand
macroeconomics better than you. That's
why we want to look not just at macro by
itself, but we want to understand the
macro sentiment. So by looking at price
and volume of financial markets, we can
understand what type of macroeconomic
scenario they believe will happen and
not just out of sheer belief but money
put on the table. So what is the market
betting the next 6 to9 months of economy
will look like? But now that we have
thoroughly understood how the macro
cycles work, what's the role of the
central bank in kind of driving and
facilitating the money flow in the real
economy through interest rate decisions
and through lubricating the financial
system through quantitative easing and
quantitative tightening. We pretty much
get the basics of macroeconomics. Then
there's a lot more data points that we
can look at, but I want to keep it
simple. There's it's already a lot of
stuff. I understand it. But I want to
keep it simple. We only have the only
thing I need you to worry about and the
only thing I need you to start caring
about is where's the employment going
and where is the inflation going and
always look at how the markets is
reacting to these news. Not just in the
short term, not just short-term price
action, but the days and the weeks
following some specific market data.
Now, let's have a throwback to the last
years. When COVID happened, the first
thing that the Federal Reserve did was
dropping interest rate at zero. Plus, if
we add the balance sheet of the Federal
Reserve, they were granting a lot of
liquidity in the financial system. And
when there's a lot of liquidity in
financial system, usually this
translates into a higher risk appetite
and stocks typically going higher. When
you have super low interest rates, a lot
of money printing, stocks just go up.
There's not much more to say. But as
soon as inflation rate started to pick
up, the Federal Reserve was telling us,
hey, this inflation is temporary. Don't
worry, guys. But then it started picking
up again and again and the market
started not believing the Federal
Reserve anymore and already started
pricing in the fact that the Fed will
eventually hike interest rates which
happened here in March April 2022. But
typically the Federal Reserve will
announce this way earlier. So as soon as
they started announcing a new hiking
cycle, typically a new hiking cycles
together with this high inflation
historically has always brought some
level of recession in the American
economy. And so the market already
started pricing in the fact that a new
recession will eventually start to
unfold and we had a new bare market. But
as soon as the inflation started running
really really low but at the same time
the unemployment rate was not moving was
just staying flat then the market
understood okay inflation is going down
no sign of recession seems to be
materializing. So they started buying
back up. So in this case, a bare market
was trying to price in a potential
recession that didn't happen. And then
you had probably one of the craziest
bull market that America and the US
stock market has ever seen. And during
this crazy bull market, which was also
fueled by the what people call the AI
bubble, these big candles that you see
here all happened during news releases.
So whenever a new data of for example
inflation data or NFP data came out you
would see these booms in prices boom and
it was not just a one-time volatility
but these news were eventually drivers
of trend. So the sentiment of the market
around macroeconomics is what ultimately
drives the long-term trend. And the same
thing by the way was happening whenever
there was a news release maybe around
inflation that was not particularly
positive. For example, here we had one
we had another inflation data coming out
here worse than expected and inflation
was going crazy, right? And so price
dropped significantly and it was not
just a news release that faded. So just
some short-term volatility. It was a
trend setting data, right? Same thing
over here in here or here another
inflation data came out or unemployment
data came out and price dropped because
in this period in this specific
historical period the market was scared
about this and the main narrative of the
markets inside of this historical period
inflation is the problem right so the
market follows a narrative for example
during the tariff war of Trump the main
narrative was tariffs and nowadays again
it is tariffs that's why we talk about
macro sentiment ment we want to see the
reaction of the market to macroeconomic
news data so that we can understand
where the long-term trend of money is
going towards. Now that we have
understood the basic of macroeconomics,
we need to put the final pieces of the
puzzles to understand the fundamentals
of each markets. And the last market we
need to explain are precious metals,
bond market and the forex market. And I
would like to start with the bond
market. So the bond market is the market
of government treasury securities or
government bonds. You have the treasury
bills, the treasury bonds and the
treasury notes. And a bond looks
something like this. Me, I, the US
government, owe the bearer of this bond,
let's say $100,000 plus 5% interest
rates one year from now. Okay, this is
basically all a bond is. It's a debt
security. So basically someone it can be
a person or it can be a bank can be a
foreign bank it can be a domestic bank
or it can be a company will lend money
to a government in this case and buy
this bond. So the government in order to
finance all of its activities will issue
bonds will basically create debt
securities that people can purchase. So
the government gets the money and the
lender whether it is an individual, a
bank or a company can earn an interest
rate. They come in different forms.
There's zero coupon bonds. So just bonds
that you know give you the whole amount
plus the interest rates at the end of
the expiration. Or there's bonds that
give you a 6 months or a 3 months coupon
where they slowly slowly give you the
5,000 throughout the year. That's why
they're also called fixed income assets.
But the basic principle is after some
time the government gives the money back
to the lender with some interest rates
and now that doesn't exist anymore. But
at the same time the person who bought
this can also sell it to other people.
Right? So in the government bond market
you typically have something called the
primary market where freshly created new
bonds are sold in auctions to basically
a group of big banks. So these banks
purchase these bonds and they lend this
money to the government. So the
government have money to spend and banks
have a way to earn an interest rate. But
they can also sell it and trade it and
even speculate on it in the secondary
market which is the market we all know
where there's traders, banks, investors,
companies, individuals, all sorts of
market participants. And so these can be
traded, right? This is of course not the
only type of bonds that exist. These are
government bonds. But also companies can
issue bonds and they're also called
corporate bonds. So the company for
example in order to in order to finance
its operation and invest in stuff will
issue bonds that banks and other
investors can purchase to earn an
interest rate. And for all of these
bonds, there is a system that basically
tells you how creditw worthy is the
issuer of this bond. So how risky is it
to lend this guy money? Typically, the
government is always kind of the safest
entity to lend money to because you're
pretty sure the government will pay its
bills. Typically, it's not always like
that. The big corporates, for example,
Apple or, you know, companies that are
very liquid can also be creditworthy.
Some companies, they might be kind of
risky. And there's a score, a metric
that the so-called rating agencies such
as standard and pores or Moody's or
Fitch. These companies will basically
give a rating to all sorts of bonds. And
they will typically look something like
this. A double A triple B
triple C
and finally D. A tier bond maybe even
down to B or double B and are often
referred to as investment grade bonds.
So bonds that are worth investing.
Anything that is below is typically
referred to as junk bonds, very high
risky bonds. So starting here, you have
super high credibility, super high
creditworthiness, then gradually less
and less and less and less until you go
to the D that stands for default. It's a
bond that it's highly likely that will
not get paid. And that's by the way what
we mean when a company or a government
defaults on its debt. basically means
that is not able to pay either all of
the money. So maybe they will pay just a
fraction of it by restructuring debt and
or not within the promised time frame.
So this is the definition of default.
And you can already start understanding
that if you're going to lend money to a
very creditworthy person and not take
much risk, maybe you can ask for a 2%
return. Maybe, right? Let's say you ask
for a 2% return. Well, if you're going
to lend it to a not so creditworthy
entity, you might want to ask maybe for
a slightly higher return to an entity
that has a higher risk of not giving it
back. Well, at least if I have to risk
that, I want a higher return. So, one of
the element that eventually determines
the interest rates is creditworthiness.
Because to lend to a high-risisk
borrower, I want a premium for my risk.
That's why it's also called the risk
premium. And another thing you can
understand is if I'm going to lend you
money for 1 year or for 30 years, well
for 30 years I might want a higher
interest rate because I'm depriving
myself of money for 30 years. So maybe
to the same person a one-year bond might
ask for a 3% interest rates. But if I
have to give it to you for 30 years,
well a lot of stuff can happen in 30
years. So I want to paid more because
it's a lot of time. So let's say this
one is 6%. This is called the risk
premium. So the difference depend in
return in interest rates based on
creditworthiness of the borrower. This
is called the term premium. So an extra
percentage point that I want because of
the time frame. And remember the bond
market is probably the biggest market in
the world for capitalization. Like
there's a lot of money in the bond
market, like trillions of dollars,
especially government bonds, right?
Because government bonds are the only
way the government can literally print
money by issuing new debt. They don't
really create new money, but they kind
of do. We'll understand it. And another
important thing about the bond market
that you can understand with the concept
of term premium is something called the
yield curve. This is a chart that is
widely known specifically in in, you
know, in all sorts of bonds, but
especially in the government bond
market. So if we say that for example a
30-year Treasury bond rewards me 6% per
year interest rate while a one-year
rewards me a 3% interest rate then you
have you know 3 months bond you have 6
months bonds you have 1 year you have
2ear bonds 3 years 5 years 7 years 10
years 20 years and finally 30 years.
Well, in a normal situation, you would
expect the three-month bond to ask for a
lower interest rate and the longer
maturities to ask for a higher interest
rate, right? So, what you typically see
is interest rates getting higher and
higher depending on maturity. And you
can basically plot a line also known as
the yield curve. And in a normal
scenario, this all makes sense. But
again, the term premium is not the only
thing that affects the yield of these
bonds, the interest rates of these
bonds. So yes, one thing is the term
premium, another thing is the risk
premium. But another thing that affects
how much my bond is yielding is for
example inflation expectations. If I
expect inflation to be 3% over the last
10 years, I want at least 3%. Likely a
little bit more because I don't want my
money to be eroded by inflation. So if
the inflation expectations for the next
let's say 3 years it's 3%, I am going to
at least ask for 5%. Right? So just an
example and bonds are the most common
and at the same time kind of safest way
to hedge against inflation. And the last
very important thing is the central
bank's interest rates. If the central
bank's interest rates is 4% let's say
well I can just go to a bank deposit
money and I will get 4% on my deposit.
So you kind of need to be competitive at
least. So you would like at least to
have a 5% right if I have to put my
money into your hands. So all of these
things are affecting the yield of the
bonds and the yield curve. For example,
when inflation expect when the market is
expecting the central bank to rise
interest rates, you would typically see
in the shortterm maturities very high
numbers sometimes even higher than the
long-term maturities and you can see the
yield curve going down inverting. That's
what we call an inverted yield curve.
This phenomena is also known as
backwardation. While a normal yield
curve is a curve in contango. Just some
cool finance terms that you might want
to learn. For example, this is the
current yield curve and it has this
really weird shape. Let's go back to
before inflation was ever a problem.
Back to April 2021. Look at this
beautiful yield curve. Interest rates
are at zero now. So all the shortterm
maturities are very close to zero. And
you have to know that especially the
shortterm maturities. So one month, two,
three, four, six months up to one year,
they are much more affected by the
central bank interest rates because
remember central bank interest rates are
by definition overnight interest rates.
So they are very shortterm. So this blue
area is where the target interest rates
for the Federal Reserve are. And you can
clearly see that the bonds were exactly
yielding somewhere close to zero. But as
you moved on, let's move on for example
to November 2021, you gradually start
see the front end of the line flattening
down. One year starting to rise. Let's
move to July 2022 and we see something
starts changing. Now the interest rates
are at 1.5. Let's move on even further.
November 2022. Also, the very shortterm
maturities are now at 4% interest rates.
The one-year Treasury bond is yielding
more than the 30-year. And in 2023, we
have a full inversion of the yield
curve, completely inverted. A 3mon bond
is yielding way more than a 30-year
bond. And this happens because, as I
said, the shortterm end of the curve is
more impacted by interest rate decisions
of the central bank. And if you go on
Trading View, you can see the bond yield
yourself. For example, you can write US
maturity 01. For example, year one year.
So, US United States Treasury bonds one
year yield. So the Y stands for yield.
And if I plot on top of this the Fed
funds rates, you can clearly see there's
clearly a pattern. And the pattern
actually is that the bonds will
anticipate what the Fed will do later.
The Fed will hike rates. Yeah. Well, I
mean the bonds knew it for at least
October since March. So yeah, as I told
you, 6 to9 months. That's the timing of
financial markets. Even here started
dropping way before the Fed was saying
it. Let's plot it with the inflation
rates now. Well, there still is some
sort of pattern, but not as cool, right?
Not as exactly there. Now, let's take a
US 30-year Treasury bonds yield. Well,
we still see somewhat of a pattern, but
for example, here when inflation started
picking up, well, the 30 years were
starting to pick up much more quickly
than the one-year because on things like
30-year bonds, long-term inflation
expectation and the risk premium, the
credit rating of the issuer play a
bigger role. And you can create your
sort of yield curve here. For example,
if I write US 30-year yields and I do
minus US 3 months yield, I have this
chart that shows me the differential,
the spread between 30-year bond yields
and 3 months bond yields. Now, let's
plot Fed funds. And typically during Fed
rate hikes, the short end of the curve
will lead a curve inversion. And
whenever we reach zero, it means that
the 30 years and the 3 months yield
exactly the same. If we go below zero,
it means that the 3 months yields more
than the third year. And we can see that
this clearly happens whenever there's an
interest rate spike. So this is
basically a simpler way to identify a
yield inversion. Whenever it's below
zero, that's what we call an inverted
yield curve. And this is a wildly maybe
overused indicator to anticipate a
recession. This is for example on Fred,
the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
They basically release economic data and
they have a this great bank of economic
data. And as you can see in history,
throughout history, whenever this
inversion happened, this is the 10-year
versus the 2 years. So still a long-term
maturity versus a kind of short-term
maturity. Every time this line went
below zero, you had a recession. And you
can see the recessions with this gray
area. Had a recession here, a recession
here, yield curve inverts, steepens,
recession, inverts, steepens, recession,
inverts, steepens, recession. Slightly
inverts, steepens, recession, inverts,
steepens. And that's why a lot of people
is expecting a recession anytime soon.
But this is not the only indicator that
one should take into consideration
because the yield curve is inverted. But
it can happen because of the interest
rates, the short-term bank interest
rates that are choking the leveraged
part of the economy. And the bond market
is really cool because there's no retail
traders. Not a lot of retail traders
speculating on bond market moves. Also,
the bonds are very low volatility
markets. Generally speaking, you never
hear bond traders in the retail space.
But in the institutional space, they are
they are one of the biggest markets.
Absolutely, hands down. And I would say
they are one of the main drivers in
general of financial market because the
bond market is just the market of debt.
It's the market of money literally. It's
money parked in the future basically. So
it greatly reflects the real expectation
of the money of really wealthy people
about what the economy might be going to
do. So also reading sentiment through
the lens of the bond market. It's
something that retail traders likely
don't do. Now another reason why it's
crucial to understand how the bond
market works is specifically to
understand another piece of the
macroeconomics puzzle because government
play a huge role into how the
macroeconomic landscape forms. So if
these are the metrics and we have
understood the role of central banks in
the macroeconomic cycle well also the
government plays a role. So government
policies in general play a huge role in
each nation's economy. Specifically the
policies that relate to the fiscal space
to taxes and in general what is called
fiscal policies. And just like any other
entity, the government also have an
income that comes from taxes and all
sorts of expenses. Expenses to build
roads, pay for the military, to pay for
the police, to pay for all sorts of
government services and public services
in general. And in an ideal world,
governments should earn more than they
actually spend. And the balance between
income and expenses is also in some way
the difference between socialism and
liberalism which are typically the right
and the left political parties. Where
typically liberalism believes in free
market, socialisms believe more in
equality and welfare. So typically
states that are more socialist will tend
to have higher expenses because they
have a lot of government services. For
example, in Italy, which is the country
I'm from, the government provides a lot
of welfare. There's a lot of government
in the economy which I personally
believe is [ __ ] I'm more in the
free market, right? But for example,
healthcare is public, school is public,
public transportation is publicly owned.
So it's mostly provided by the
government in a predominantly liberalist
economy or nation. Healthcare is
private, education is private,
transportation is private. And by free
market, we mean a purer version of
capitalism where you just let privates
do their own thing. And I personally
believe this is more representative of a
meritocracy and has proven to really
work. If you live people freed to do
entrepreneurship, they will create new
jobs. And if you incentivize people to
entrepreneurship, the wealth of the
country will rise. But also socialists
have proven to be an effective antidote
to the inequality that liberalism can
cause at times. So with higher taxes on
rich people, they manage to rebalance
inequality. So most western societies
try to find a balance between socialism
and liberalism and free capitalism. So
we also understand that a very socialist
state will have a lot of expenses
because the government is providing for
healthare for education for
transportation for pensions and
retirement plans. All things that are
private here. So a socialist state will
have more expenses. So we'll have to
have more taxes as well. Whereas a more
liberalist state that promotes free
market and capitalism will tend to have
lower expenses and so a lesser need for
taxes. But for example, if the
government takes as taxes 20 trillion,
ideally the expenses should also be 20
trillion. But a lot of times this does
not happen. Sometimes it might happen
that there's more expenses, for example,
25 trillion. So for that extra $5
trillion, that's where the government
needs to issue more debt. issue $5
trillion of debt. So when income is not
enough to cover all of the expenses that
the government had and it has to use
debt, that's what we call a fiscal
deficit, which is the opposite of a
government running a fiscal surplus,
which happens when the income are more
than the expenses. And you can
understand that a fiscal deficit is
basically taking this $5 trillion and
put it right into the economy because
the government is spending that money.
So that money is going into the economy.
So it typically has at least in the
short to medium-term a positive effect
on the overall growth of the economy.
While a fiscal surplus where the
government is earning more money and
collecting more money with taxes than
it's putting into the economy by
spending money, a fiscal surplus is
positive for the government because it's
earning more money, but it's negative
technically to the economy because we're
taking money away from the economy and
not spending as much. And typically when
governments announce that they will run
a very strong fiscal deficit just like
Trump is planning to, the stock market
typically roars and just explodes in a
very intense bull market because this
will mean more money into the pocket of
customers that will spend money into the
companies and buy products and services
from companies will brings the earnings
of those companies higher. And so the
stock market which is where these
companies are traded will anticipate
that this will happen and will start
buying stock and pumping stock prices
up. But this has a limit because in
order to run on fiscal deficit a
government needs to issue debt needs to
issue bonds and those bonds are
expensive because there's interest
rates. As we know the public debt of a
nation is the total amount of
outstanding government bonds that have
been issued by a government. For
example, this is the US debt. US public
debt has broken the ceiling of $30
trillion. Irregardless, by the way,
there was a Republican or a Democrat
president. So, more of a liberalist
party or a socialist party. Regardless
of this, depth just kept going higher
and higher. And you remember we were
talking about the GDP as the measure for
how much wealth a country is producing
in a year. And even though that is very
important metric in the economy because
a very important metric to assess the
productivity of a country as we
discussed we also understood that it's
one thing if the growth is structural
because of strong demography and
technological innovation but because of
the debt system if the government is
running on a deficit the economy will
grow faster right so the relationship
between how much debt there is in an
economy and the GDP of that economy is
the truly important metric to assess in
a way how virtuous that economy really
is. So between the important metrics in
an economy, we want to add the total
public debt to GDP ratio aka public debt
over GDP in percentage. And this is a
chart of the US debt to GDP ratio. And
we typically consider a nation virtuous
when the debt to GDP ratio stays below
100 because it means that the growth and
the wealth that that nation produces in
that year it's driven by real
productivity not just debt leverage and
typically everything above 100% will
start to raise some alarms because it
means that the government is constantly
issuing new debt and constantly running
on a deficit which in the long term All
of this economic expansion built on
leverage will have to live some sort of
contraction. And the bigger the
leverage, the bigger the contraction.
Plus, because of interest rates, if the
debt is increasingly higher than GDP,
the money I will earn from taxes will
start to be less and less compared to
the interest rates that I will need to
pay on my debt that will continue
rising. Because if the GDP grows, but
the debt grows at a higher rate than the
GDP, my expenses on the debt, which is
the interest rate, and the taxes that I
earn from the wealth generated in the
country, the gap between them will force
me to keep running on an even crazier
deficit. And this will spiral into what
we're seeing now in the American economy
and in a lot of economies in general.
And the highest risk of this is exactly
inflation because with the government
printing basically a lot of new money
but because since the government is
issuing so much debt it's basically like
creating new money right especially if
the central bank is also doing
quantitative easing and constantly
buying those bonds from the secondary
market. So fiscal deficit is actual real
economy money printing and if people
spend more prices will rise. So the risk
of constantly running on a deficit and
constantly printing new money is that
the money will lose its value because of
inflation. And we've seen this thing
happening in all sorts of nations in the
world starting from Germany in the 30s
or in Argentina and Venezuela or even in
Turkey where you had episode of what is
called hyperinflation which is whenever
inflation goes above 100% year-over-year
which is crazy but for what concerns the
money flow whenever there's fiscal
deficit just think that the stocks will
just typically in the US and the most
western economies fiscal deficit
typically means big growth leveraged
growth grow in an economy. So now that
we have understood the role of
government policies in the money world
and how the national debt and the fiscal
deficit affects the economy and the
markets overall, we truly understand the
role of bonds in the economy of the bond
market overall and we can finally start
talking about the forex market. And the
forex market or foreign exchange is the
market of foreign currencies. It's also
the market that is mostly traded by
wannabe traders, trading newbies for the
wrong reasons because the brokerage
industry and the guru industry managed
to create a casino out of the forex
market which is actually one of the most
untransparent market there is. It's
completely traded OTC. So it's like but
now we want to understand it in a
different way. We want to understand the
fundamentals of the forex market. And as
we know as it's the currency market you
have all sorts of currency pairs market.
So in the forex market, you always have
one currency, for example, the dollar
versus, for example, the Japanese yen,
JPY. And when you trade the forex
market, you're basically betting against
the rising and falling of the exchange
rate between two currencies. And there's
all sorts of currency pairs. For
example, the Euro dollar, euro USD,
pound USD, also known as the cable,
AUDUSD, also known as the Aussie, you
have the NZDU USD, the New Zealand
dollars, and so on and so forth. And you
can just shuffle them and mix them
however you like. You have euro GBP,
Euro OD or GBP, Canadian dollar and so
on and so forth. Now if for example the
exchange rate of this is 1.15, it means
that for one euro I can get $1.15,
right? And if the euro is stronger than
the dollar, the exchange rate will go
up. If the dollar is stronger than the
euro, the currency pair will go down.
Very basic. But the real question we
need to ask is what makes a currency
stronger than the other one? What are
the fundamental drivers of the forex
market? The main drivers of the forex
market are central bank interest rates
and bond yields. That's why before
coming to the forex market, we went
through literally everything that you
need to know about the economy because
you cannot understand the driver of the
forex market if you don't understand
macroeconomics overall. And I can assure
you if you were a forex trader and you
did not know anything about
macroeconomics and you were just like
trading forex CFDs on a meta trader prop
firm whatever this will truly open your
mind. Let's keep Euro dollar as an
example. Let's say that the interest
rates of the central bank of the euro
let's make an example at 1% and the bond
yields for let's say a one-year bond are
1.5%. And now for the dollar, let's say
that the Federal Reserve has set the
interest rates at 5% and the bond deals
are around like 5.2%. If you had to park
your money somewhere, let's say in a
bank or let's say in a government bond
and park your money there to hedge
yourself safely for inflation, blah blah
blah. Which one will you choose? Would
you choose to keep euros that yields you
1% per year or dollars that give you
like a fat 5% per year? Of course, you
would prefer to invest in a dollarbased
bond because the yield is higher. So,
the main fundamental driver of the forex
market is the spread between interest
rates or the spread between yields. And
something really cool can happen because
of the spread between interest rates.
Cuz in a situation like this, I can, for
example, borrow €100,000
where I pay a 1% interest rate. And with
this money, I can buy €100,000
worth of US government bonds and that
will pay me 5% interest. So by borrowing
this money and rebarorrowing it to
another government that pays better
interest rates, I basically made for
free a 4% return on the capital. This is
called a carry trade. Exploiting the
interest rate differential to borrow
money at a cheap interest rates and
reend it to someone else at a higher
interest rate. Typically buying
government bonds. The most famous carry
trade of the last 20 centuries was the
yen carry trade because the bank of
Japan for probably the last 30 years has
kept interest rates at zero. So imagine
borrowing yens at basically 0% interest
rates and then buying any other bond
that maybe can yield you 5%. That's just
literally free money. And this trade was
huge. And the yen carry trade is a very
interesting case study because it caused
some instabilities in August 2023 on the
yen, on the dollar, and on the entire
world stock market. We'll maybe make a
video about it. So the spread between
interest rates of two currencies
determines the trend of a forex pair.
But as always, just as I told you that
the cycles in the economy are
anticipated by the stock market exactly
the same way, the spread between the
interest rates is always anticipated by
the forex market. So the smart money in
the forex market is trying to predict
what the spread will be. And if for
example they expect at some point in the
future interest rates on the euro going
high and interest rates on the dollars
going low 6 months before the market
will price it in and push Euro dollar
up. So it's not the spread between the
interest rates but it's the expectations
on what the spread between these two
will be in the future. Always remember.
And how does the market try to
anticipate this? Well, it's pretty easy
because inflation and employment data as
we discussed directly affect monetary
policy decisions which includes interest
rates. So both the yields of the bonds
and the interest rate decisions will be
highly affected by for example how
inflation goes but also how employment
goes. So whenever a new inflation data
or employment data comes out, if the
inflation and the employment has a clear
direction already that the market is
starting to bet in favor of, that's when
big trends happen. Let me go on Trading
View real quick. On my profile, a trade
idea that I probably shared, I don't
know, a lot of years ago. It's written
in Italian, but I was saying basically
the FOMC is starting to spread around
some rumors on tapering. And just so you
remember, the tapering is slowing down
this printing of money from the Fed,
which is the first phase of the hiking
cycle that will lead to higher the
interest rates on the dollar. So less
dollars being printed, higher interest
rates on the dollars. So we would expect
the US rates to go up while the GBP
rates at that point will still flat. So
we would expect the dollar to finally
catch up. And we were just coming out of
COVID, by the way, where the dollar lost
all of its value because of all the
money printing. And now after this huge
trend, they've just decided to stop all
of this money printing and hire interest
rates instead. And rates were at zero at
that point. So this was the beginning of
the hiking cycles. And in June 15, 2021,
this was the area where I made this
analysis at the top of the range and I
said this is likely where we're going to
short because this was a complete
reversal in monetary policies. That's
where the biggest short impulse in
history probably on the GBPUSD happened
with 4,000 pips from the entry I called.
I mean, that's awesome. And then, of
course, everything changed because then
Trump got into power with a clear aim to
lower interest rates. And well, now you
know the story. And that's why when you
see inflation data or employment data
coming up, you see a lot of volatility
in forex. And if you always read it
through the lens of what will the
central banks do with this data you the
volatility that will happen in the forex
will not be a mystery to you anymore.
And by the way just with this stuff
world trading champion Yan Smolen in
2021 2022 2023 won three times the world
trading championships just with this
concept. So these are the main
fundamentals you need to know about the
forex market. And we can move to our
final markets which is the precious
metal market. And we're specifically
talking about gold and silver that could
be considered commodities. But but
unlike normal commodities that are
simply driven by expectations around
supply and demand, the driver of these
markets are completely different because
they're not seen as commodities. They
are seen as store of value for some
reason. So for example, these are used
especially gold as a hedge against
inflation. So because they are a store
of value, they are used as a hedge
against inflation, but also a hedge in
general against economical or
geopolitical uncertainty. So whenever
there's wars, whenever there's
economical uncertainty, typically we see
gold and silver go really really up. And
another driver which more than a driver
is probably a very strong historical
correlation specifically with gold and
its little brother silver because
they're a hedge against inflation. The
second biggest hedge against inflation,
as we said, is bonds, right? Bonds is
the safest asset to invest to have a
yield and just hedge a little bit
against inflation, right? So, we could
say that bonds yields specifically are
the main competitor of gold.
Specifically, something called real bond
yields. And in finance or in economy,
let's say, anything that we define as
real is net of inflation. For example,
if the bonds yields 5.5%,
that's the interest rate on the bonds.
But we have a 2% inflation rate, then
the real yield I get on my money is
3.5%. Right? And the same thing, by the
way, goes for the GDP growth rate. If
the GDP growth rate is 2%, but the
inflation rate year-over-year is 1%,
then the real growth that happened in
that year, so the real GDP growth was
1%. because the GDP is calculated in
dollars and if those dollars lost value
because of inflation then the real GDP
growth is 1% not two. So because gold
was always a hedge against inflation
there is an inverse correlation between
real bond yields and gold because if the
real yield of bond is really high and
for example I don't know I can get an 8%
return because bonds are basically
risk-f free I would probably prefer to
put my money in bonds if I have to hedge
against inflation instead of silver or
gold that can be more volatile. If
instead the real bond yields are like
one or 2%. Well, that's not a lot of
growth to be honest. So, I might just as
well buy gold. So, this is the chart of
gold and let's add on top of this real
yield. So, US 5 years yields minus break
even inflation rates which basically are
the expectations of 5 years inflation.
So, this is the chart of the so-called
real interest rates. If we plot the gold
chart on top of this and look at the
historical charts. So bonds were not
considered to be a good hedge against
inflation. That's exactly when gold
pumped. When real rates or real bond
yields started growing up, that's
typically when gold suffered. And
especially when they started rising
really fast, that's when gold dropped.
And spoiler alert also here, we can
anticipate when the bond yields are
going to go up with monetary policies.
Then after this huge rise in real yields
and consequent gold bare market as soon
as we started stabilizing and started
kind of going lower that's when boom
gold started going up and then they
picked up again. So gold decided to go
down a little bit but then they dropped
again and that's where gold [ __ ] and
throughout all these years while real
yields started dropping gold had the run
of its life and also here not so long
ago I posted this which is now hidden
for some reason because it's violating
one of more house rules whatever I was
exactly highlighting a long idea on gold
this trade idea was on September 2023
and since we were expecting because we
were having high inflation, but also we
were expecting the end of the hawkish
cycle and finally interest rates
starting to gradually go slightly lower,
we could expect a new long cycle in
gold. And guess what happened? Yep,
that's where we're here today. So you
can slowly start understanding that if
you learn what the market is currently
betting based on newly coming news and
based on newly published macroeconomic
data by understanding macroeconomics and
especially the role that they play in
financial markets, you can have an edge
on long-term trades and on swing trading
that is just something else. It's not
just a candlestick based strategy. It's
learning how to be in the flow of smart
money that is trying to following
macroeconomics and that is [ __ ]
awesome. And you can do it to anticipate
what the stock market will do, hence
what the crypto market will do, also
some commodities, but especially what
the bond market will do, hence where the
forex market will go with ridiculous
degree of accuracy as well as gold. And
there's two main practical ways you can
use fundamentals. You can use
fundamentals and macroeconomics news
data either to write news, also known as
news trading, which to be honest
requires some experience, but it's one
of the main strategies of one of the
best traders I know. It's not for
beginners, but it's really cool. Or you
can ride long-term trends with swing
trading or even position
trading/investing
where you ride long-term trends, which
is by the way swing trading and position
trading. one of the if not the main
trading type of smart money because of
the fact that macroeconomic trends
fundamentals are so reliable because
they're based on the reality of each
market. Not only they provide a great
edge historically big money and smart
money as we said they have huge orders.
One order can even take a whole day to
be filled or even days, even weeks maybe
for what we know because as we said,
they are so big that if they were to buy
all at once, they will move price. So
the main kind of trading that these guys
do is long-term trading. They are
investing in the market. A lot of the
greatest hedge funds in the world are
so-called global macro hedge funds. So
even though retail traders that smart
money trading is daily price action
hunting stop-loss [ __ ] to be honest
real smart money trading is long-term
trading is swing trading position
trading macroeconomics big trends that
even the big money because they're so
big can take advantage of they shortterm
price action is not liquid enough to
create a substantial edge to smart money
it's not enough most unless they're
doing HFT but even there the edge is
very limited That's why global macro
hedge funds and long-term trading
investing is the main business of smart
money when they're trading the markets.
And that's why the day trading action
when the movement of prices throughout
the day can be more random, but still we
can read them through how these
participants feel their long-term orders
and through auction market theory
realize that hey, this is where maybe
they're buying or selling here.
something clearly happened that shifted
maybe a news event happened that drove
the fair valuation of this asset up and
now they found liquidity again and now
they're trading here. So, I'm going to
follow the big money in the intraday or
let's say the shortterm market price
action and look at where the money is
going with order flow and with volume
analysis while still being aware and
aligned with the global macro view and
the long-term trends. Welcome to
professional trading. And there's a lot
of way we can follow this by the way in
the daily actions. We can follow it
through order flow and auction market
theory and option flow blah blah blah.
And we will use volume analysis for
swing trading. We'll get deep into how a
strategy based on auction market theory
for swing trades might work. But also we
can track big money and smart money
through something called the commitment
of trader report which is another
[ __ ] cheat code for swing trading
because the coot report basically tells
us how much the smart money are buying
or selling in a week. So once we have a
global macro narrative and we identify
the trend, we can confirm with the coot
report if the smart money is actually
going that way and through volume we can
actually follow the money by seeing it
on the charts. Isn't this absolutely
phenomenal? Isn't this awesome? And all
of this without a secret algorithm,
without inventing [ __ ] about the
market, but but but simply looking at
how the world works, how money works in
each market, rationally analyzing market
participation, and through order flow
and auction market theory, time our
entry like [ __ ] snipers. Now, I am
really tired. I've recorded all night.
Leave a [ __ ] like to this video once
and for all. Now I'm going to stop
recording and restart tomorrow so that
we can take everything that we've
learned and start building a solid
strategy and first start building a
solid swing strategy and after that we
will be able to move on to more
shortterm day trading strategies as
well. So now I will share with you some
trading models both for position trading
for swing trading and news trading. For
position trading, I am not a huge
position trader, but if you want to re
really write the long-term trends of
fundamental analysis, there's already a
widely used uh model by, you know,
professional investors and institutional
investor that basically follows
something also known as the Mary Lynch
investment clock model or the sector
rotation model where for example on this
chart, this is the economic cycle.
This is the market cycle. Same thing
over here. Very similar. And during each
phase of the cycle, so during the
recession where we're falling recession,
that's where typically the market
bottoms because the market tries to
anticipate the fact that the economy
will recover. Then we have an early
recover and that's where we're in the
full bull market. Full recovery. That's
where they say the market tops even
though I don't fully agree. And in the
early stages of a recession or slightly
before a recession recession starts
happening, that's where you actually see
a bare market. And in the different
stages of this, the risk aversion goes
up and down. And there are some sectors
that performs best than others. For
example, in the early stages during
market bottoms and during bull markets,
we see sectors like the technology
sector, like the communication services
sectors, the discretionary sector
typically pumping up and outperforming
most other sectors and stuff like
energy, healthcare, consumer staples,
utilities typically keep performing
better than these ones in the phases of
bare market because they are considered
as more stable type of sectors because
as I saiduring during a race session,
you're still going to buy groceries, but
you're not going to buy a a new iPhone,
maybe, right? So, different sectors
perform better, and you can rotate a
portfolio based on ETFs of every single
sector depending on where we're likely
to be heading with the economy, which is
very similar to the investment clock of
Meil Lynch, where you have growth
recovers. So, we're in the upway of the
cycle. Inflation rises. That's the top
of the cycle where inflation is getting
really high. Then growth weakens. We're
at the top of the cycle going to this
part of the cycle. And then inflation
falling when the cycle is in its final
step of recession before again growth
recovers. And you basically divide this
cycle in quadrants where you have
recovery, overheat, stagflation, and
then reflation. And in each quarter of
this model, different asset classes
perform best. So bonds typically perform
good here. Stocks perform best during
recoveries. Commodities in the phase of
overheat is where they're performing
best because they're also the reason why
overheat is happening because if all the
commodity prices goes up, all of the
prices go up and inflation rises and
then you get to stackflation. So, these
models are great and are definitely
worth getting deep into if you're
looking to invest in the market with a
capital allocation type of perspective,
but position trading is, as I said,
riding longterm trends. These cycles can
take years, and this is great if you're
looking to just use a capital allocation
model and basically switch your
investments smartly by following the
global macroeconomic landscape. But this
is not the type of trading that
personally I have engaged into. So I'd
rather spend most of the time explaining
you the way both me and my partner Fabio
and also Patrick Neil the world trading
champion and also Jansming partly trades
using both macroeconomics but also the
rest of the fundamentals of each market.
So we take the macroeconomic plot chart
and we kind of take inspiration in a way
from this type of thing but we help
ourselves with unemployment data,
inflation data, interest rate data,
balance sheet data and intermarket
analysis and do something in a similar
fashion of the Meil Lynch investment
clock model, but just to assess the
trend, but we time the market better
thanks to the auction market theory
model and we follow the big money with
technical analysis and with the
commitment of traders report. So the
checklist to build the context here is
first looking at macros. So monetary
policies, which stage of the cycle we
are, fiscal policies, how is the
government handling money printing, how
is unemployment, how is inflation, and
what is the soft data telling us. And
while here we can just take a look at
which point we are in the cycle here we
can do the same but typically we take a
look at how fast these data points
change. So what's the rate of change of
these data points and let's do a
practical example of where we're at now.
We take the Fed funds rates we take the
unemployment rate. We take inflation and
let's start with this. And just like
this we can already understand in which
phase of the cycle we are. We're in a
phase where inflation is steadily
getting lower but maybe in a phase where
it's starting to pick up a little bit
and we are in a situation where
employment is slowly starting to pick up
but at the same times the tightening
stance of monetary policies policies is
getting lower. We take real GDP growth
quarteron quarter and we can see that
growth is doing fine. The economy is
growing quarter over quarter. So overall
the economy is doing great. Employment
is doing good. Inflation is also doing
okay. So there's a good likelihood that
the Fed will keep cutting rates. But as
always in macroeconomics, there's
multiple scenarios possible. So first we
build scenario one, scenario two, and
maybe a third scenario. Scenario one is
unemployment stays low, the economy is
resilient, and inflation is pretty
stable. And that will bring the Federal
Reserve to cut rates. The unemployment
of course stays low but slowly picks up
but not in a recession type of fashion.
If this scenario is great in all of
this, the government is running a
deficit and that brings money into the
real economy. If this is the scenario
that ultimately happens, we're going to
be long on stocks, short on the dollar,
and long on gold because all of this
money printing and the Fed cuts will
boost the economy. The economy is
already telling us it resilient. We
don't have to worry about inflation and
hence the Fed having to hike interest
rates and the unemployment is okay. So
the expectations on earnings on stocks
are higher. But at the same times all of
this money printing the Fed is going to
cut rates because the inflation is going
down. If the inflation is going down and
the interest rates are going down, it
means that the bond yields on the dollar
will also go down and fixed income bond
investors will likely not keep a lot of
dollars. And that's really useful for,
for example, the forex markets, right?
Because if we can find, for example, a
currency that has the opposite problem,
so a high inflation, so higher interest
rates and higher bond yields, that
currency will be really strong. So the
next step is to do the same thing with
another currency and spoiler alert GBP
could be one of them in the near future
and basically have a trade there. The
economies is resilient but there's at
the same times a lot of uncertainty but
especially because the inflation is
going down and the Feds are cutting
rates. It's likely that the real yield
of bonds will also go down then we're
long gold because bonds are not anymore
a good inflation hedge. So gold is now
we look at scenario two. Unemployment
starts rising higher than expected.
Inflation drops drastically. The Fed has
to cut rates more aggressively and the
government of course keeps printing
money. This does not change anything as
a short on the US dollar, a long on
gold. Stocks might start being not so
attractive. They might still go up
because they have a bias of kind of
hoping for the best, but it will not be
a trend, but it will likely be a trend
with huge retracements and a lot of buy
the dip going on. But if this becomes
and unfolds into a recession, even
though the Fed is cutting rates, you
will likely see the stock market going
down. So stocks short if recession, so
if the expectation of a recession start
rising. And scenario three, inflation
rises unexpectedly, unemployment stays
relatively low. This will bring the Fed
to kind of want to hike rates. And for
now, let's say the government just keeps
printing money. Well, the fact that the
Fed will likely hike rates will
completely shift our bias on the USD. We
will likely see the big short trend that
has been the protagonist of the forex
market in the last months at least
retracing. So probably long USD maybe
finally the time for a retracement of on
gold and we're kind of neutral on stock.
And by neutral I mean that there's could
be some short-term retracement but it's
probably going to just buy the dip again
like it always happens. So these are the
three scenarios and now we look at what
the markets are actually doing to see on
which scenario the market is currently
actually putting its money. So, we look
at the DXY, we go on to the daily time
frame, and well, the trend has been
pretty clear. It seems like the market
is still betting on the first scenario
to happen. So, inflation down,
unemployment
slightly up, Fed cutting rates. So, this
is what the market is betting will be
happening slash is happening. So, we've
built our three macroeconomic scenarios.
And the next question is what is the
market currently pricing in aka betting
on? And for example, if the market is
betting on scenario one, we also define
it as our macro narrative, which is what
the market is believing will happen in
the next 3 to six to nine months. And we
do that by looking at the DXY, by
looking at the S&P 500, by looking at
bonds, and by looking at gold. Now, what
often will happen is that new
macroeconomic data points will come out
in the future, and they will either
confirm the narrative, be somewhat
neutral to the narrative, or radically
negate the narrative. For example, if
scenario one was inflation down,
unemployment
slightly up, Fed cutting, if the next
CPI for example is confirming the
narrative or let's say it like that, if
it is exacerbating the narrative, for
example, CPI really down, then this will
help the current trend to continue. This
could happen for example if the
unemployment at the same time is also
going down. So these two data points are
exacerbating the narrative slash
confirming the narrative and they will
either cause price to continue betting
on that. But that's when we have to look
at price because if the market has been
pricing in this narrative for a long
time like it has for example here all
throughout this time the market has been
pricing in pricing in pricing in pricing
in pricing in this scenario. What
happened here for example during the
last FOMC meeting is that the Fed
confirmed the scenario and what happened
which sometime does the market will take
profits on this bet. So a buy the news
event will happen. So depending at which
point we are in the trend, if we are at
very discount prices, this will push the
price towards the trend. If we already
priced it in and we are basically at
all-time highs, it can be that even
though the data is confirming the
narrative, you would have a sell the
news event. So option one, we keep the
trend going. Option two, if we're really
high and we've already priced in the
narrative, we'll sell the news. But for
this, of course, we need technicals. If
the data is neutral to to the narrative,
typically you will not see a lot of
market movement. If it is radically
negating the narrative, especially in a
period like this where the markets are
kind of waiting to see what will happen,
that's when you can see trend
inversions. And when trend inverts,
that's when you have to be really
careful if a new scenario or a new
narrative is currently being priced in.
Now, with a practical example, let's go
to the GBPUSD and and currently if we
take a look at the UK CPI. So, we can
just search for inflation rates in the
economy part for the United Kingdom. And
we take the United Kingdom inflation
rate year-over-year. And for example, we
compare it with the United States
inflation rate year-over-year. Well, we
can see that the UK one has been picking
up pretty aggressively. We are at 3.8
versus a mere 2.9. So inflation is way
more problematic in the UK as of today.
And this has some likelihood to bring
the UK central bank to hike rates. We
plot the UK interest rates and yes they
have been cutting but now they are kind
of thinking about stopping because the
inflation rate is getting high or even
maybe rehiking them a little bit and all
of this is contributing to the strength
of the GBP in contrast with the weakness
of the dollar. So this could be a trade
idea and this is where we start using
the auction market theory model to try
and catch the best trades. So when we
have to answer what is the market
currently pricing in or betting on we
rely on two main factors. First
technical analysis through the auction
market theory model and two the analysis
of participation. So if through the
auction market theory model we're
basically taking a look at okay where is
price going but not only price where is
the volume going right where is the
money going. In participation analysis,
we may take a look at, for example, the
COT report, which exactly tells us what
the institutional traders, the big
speculators are doing. And depending on
the market, we can use option data. We
can take a look, for example, at what
the retail sentiment is doing to kind of
try and understand, okay, where is the
smart money going and when is the dumb
money going. And for the auction market
theory models, we take this beautiful
model that we have drawn back here. We
paste it all the way here and we
basically create two ideal setups.
Whenever we see that a range formed and
price went up and created a new range,
this means that a new fair value has
been accepted. So we take the volume
profile of this part of price, which
will likely look something like this.
Not a lot of volume and then big volume
because there's a lot of trading
happening here. This is where the money
is and then again slow. This will be the
top of the range which will likely
coincide with our value area. This is
the bottom. And as we said in the model,
either price starts pumping up or price
tries to pump up but fails or tries to
pump down and fails. So these are the
three options basically. So the first
model here is to wait for price to drop
and fall again to prices that were
considered really cheap by aggressive
buyers by the same buyers that were
considering these prices cheap and kept
buying because they couldn't get enough.
And these are the same prices where the
sellers that were considering these
prices to be cheap were like, you know
what, yeah, they're not so cheap.
Actually, the best prices to sell are
these ones and these ones and these
ones. So here you had an imbalance in
the auction because these prices were
considered unfair by sellers and fair by
buyers. So as soon as sellers maybe
because of some mechanical selling
pressure that normally sits below market
lows push the auction higher, we want to
see these same buyers that consider
these prices cheap to now kick back in
and push price back into the range.
maybe with a big daily candle that
closes back inside of the daily range or
with a very strong movement anyways. And
this is our first setup. We'll wait for
price to trace back here and we'll
either buy to take profit to the other
side of the range or wait for a test
before going up. That is setup number
one. Setup number two is after price has
done this is we wait for a strong
breakout with a lot of volume and
position ourselves as soon as price
retraces a little bit maybe onto this
area to look for a continuation. And
these are the same models by the way
that I have learned from Tom Forvault
and Patrick Neil the world trading
champions themselves. These are only two
of the many models that they teach. And
for example they call this the breakin
and the breakout. So, for example, in
this Forex example, I would take a fixed
range volume profile, draw it from the
beginning of the last impulse to the
current price. And the volume profile
will basically tell me, hey, this is
where most money was traded. And you can
see one part is highlighted. That's
because I have set this volume profile
with the value area. You don't 100% need
it. This is a statistical reference. We
can also put it at 100 and just think
about where the biggest chunk of volume
is, right? And we understand it's here.
And what I do is I take the end of these
areas. From a situation of high volume,
we dropped into a situation of low
volume. Okay, that's the lower area. And
here from a situation of high volume, we
dropped, right? So this is the higher
value area. And I always want to see
what's happening here, here, here. So we
failed auctioning lower and the same
buyers that bought here and bought here
kept buying here and they also tried
buying outside of this range but sellers
were not ready yet. They still consider
these prices to be fair. So they pushed
the price back in until the other side
of the range. So the market is clearly
still in a situation of balance. But we
did this. We tested here. And this was
for example a good trade idea to go
until here. If a new failed auction
might happen with a strong rejection and
some value created here, then this is
still a good setup. So I would have
either bought here with the idea of
going to the other side of the range or
wait for a strong breakout. Some time
spent outside here to keep auctioning up
if the macroeconomic data plus the coot
reports tells us that the economy is
going the same way and the institutions
are too. Or for example here in the S&P
500 we clearly had this as the main
let's say distribution era. Trump came
in with the tariffs. Scare the [ __ ] out
of the market. But the economy was doing
great. He literally said, "Guys, buy the
dip." This was the value area high. This
was the valier area low. And already
since here, you started seeing this
happening. Market kind of consolidating
here and then breaking out. Then
consolidating again, and then breaking
out again. And the auction is clearly
telling us where the money is going. And
so this was just a huge breakin. So we
break back in, spend some time there,
test. That's the first trade to the
other side. Second trade at the
breakout. But we're clearly looking at
we basically almost weekly charts. But
even here, what happens again? A
situation of out of balance, finding
balance. Same concept here. Price breaks
back, tests. That's another long setup.
Then price moves up, create a situation
of balance, breaks, and test it right
here. by the way. So this is a very
simple model that simply follows the
basic rules of the market to easily
follow the big money. And if we couple
this with where is the institutional
money going with the COT report, which
by the way you can find for free here at
tradingstair.com/cot.
And in the COOT report, you basically
see non-commercials with which are large
speculator, commercials, which are
hedgers, and non-reportables, which are
technically retails, even though, you
know, they're still kind of sort of big.
But we want to look at the
non-commercials. And the
non-commercials, which are the banks,
big banks, and institutions that are
speculating and not engaging in futures
trading for hedging purposes, will
basically tell us all the story. They
went long and increased their long
exposure for 4,000 contracts which are
almost 5% of the total exposure and they
closed almost 900 short contracts. So we
can go also in this chart take off the
commercials, take off the
non-reportables and we can clearly see
that they have been accumulating and
buying all of this time. Even though
their net exposure was short, it's
gradually drifting back up to being a
net long position. Now, unfortunately,
the last data is from September 23rd,
and we're missing a lot of data because
the government, the US government is
currently in shutdown. But, for example,
we can see what the retails are doing.
So, we can go on my FX book retail
sentiment, look at GBPUSD, and wow, and
clearly see that most retail traders are
absolutely shorting this market. So
recap the scenario is telling us that
likely GBP is rising and USD is falling
because of the spread between the
expected bond yields in both currencies.
The COT reports tells us institution are
buying and retail sentiment is telling
us that retails are selling and the
price action is is pretty clear. And me
and Fabio, by the way, I've used this
model for months in public live
sessions, calling hundreds of trades
with a really high win rate and
risk-to-reward ratio, which is a really
great case study of how to use this
approach to the markets. We understand
where is the money likely to flow from
the fundamental side. We look at the
money flow through the COT report. We
look at the money flow through the
technicals and we use them to time our
entry perfectly. And this is a trading
model that once a month we're also
applying live in the worldass edge
channel for free with a live sessions
where we use this model to analyze the
market and see potential trading setups.
So if you want to join you can find the
link in the description. It's completely
free. So now thanks to the macro plot
chart checklist through the building of
a scenario through the liquidity auction
theory model we have a very powerful
swing trading model. But this model also
is really really powerful for everything
that relates to day trading because it's
clearly allowing us to identify where
the money is being traded. So this is a
fractal concept that you can apply in
most time frames with of course due
adaptations. So we can zoom out and get
back to the micro mechanics. Remember
how we talked about how market orders
are interacting with each other to make
price move? And that's the basic micro
mechanic, the granular micro mechanics
that shows how money intent through
accepting liquidity is the only driver
of price movements. So the same way we
use this to interpret price action in
the swing trading, 4hour time frame, in
the 1 hour time frame, in the daily time
frame, we can also use this in lower
time frames. And we can use this model
for a shorterterm type of trading which
is day trading. And unlike swing
trading, day trading is for all intents
and purposes a profession that requires
time that could have a higher return,
but it's way more stressful. The
statistics are the same. 90% of traders
fail and there's a much higher
adrenaline involved. So trading
psychology, especially in day trading,
is one of the main issues for beginner
traders. So, as I said before, the best
way to start day trading is to start
with a simple strategy. have a
mechanical approach, an objective set of
rules that takes advantage of a
structural edge. So, first we start with
something very simple, something
profitable, very mechanical. But the
goal in day trading needs to be becoming
a proficient discretionary trader cuz
this is not a algorithmic trading
course. And in order to become a
proficient discretionary day trader, a
super simple, super mechanical, super
objective, almost algorithmical trading
strategy, I would say is enough to make
the first profits. But to become a
really successful discretionary trader,
you need to do a lot of reps. You need
to work on your intuition, not just on
information and develop a subjective
probability. This is how you can scale
as a discretionary trader. And as I
said, this requires time and the proper
mindset. So, what we're going to do now
in the next step of this video is we're
going to first learn five simple trading
strategies that you can start as a
beginner that are very mechanical. And
then we're going to take a look at how
to read market action to learn how build
a shortterm narrative. These five simple
trading strategies are the oops strategy
by world trading champion Larry
Williams. We're going to learn a gap
fill strategy that I've learned from
Patrick Nil, world trading champion.
We're going to learn a opening range
breakout which is a great classic that I
personally learned with Fabio Valentini.
four times world top ranked trader in
the Robbins Cup. The same with Larry
Williams and Patrick Nil, but was
originally coded by a guy named Tobby
Crrael in the '9s. Then we're going to
learn the rule of four by Tom Hogart,
one of the best traders I've ever met,
author of the book Best Losers Win, and
the PBD strategy by Tom Forvald, which
is the mentor of Patrick Neil himself,
also mentored Fabio Valentini and
myself. And please keep in mind all of
these have decades of data and have been
back tested and for tested and these are
strategies that perform even though they
are all a very basic set of rules. So
they have been through a process of
statistical validation which is
something that I strongly suggest you to
do as well which is something not a lot
of traders do because they believe is
not good but I believe it's super
crucial especially as a beginner and
observe it and look for patterns that
repeat and that you can see constantly
and once you've observed them you come
up with a hypothesis. So for example,
every time the first 30 minute of this
session is broken, most of the time
price will continue rising. So that's a
good strategy, right? Which is also the
principle of the opening range breakout
strategy that we will learn. So now we
have to take this hypothesis and do some
in simple testing also known as back
test. And when you back test, you have
to have of course clear rules. So entry
and exit rules. For example, where's my
entry? Where do I place my stop loss?
Where do I place my takerit? Is it a
fixed riskto-reward take-profit? Is it a
fixed percentage or points take-profit?
Same with a stop-loss. And these have to
be fixed. And for example, you can build
an Excel sheet like this one. I'm going
to leave this one in the description so
you can use it yourself where you can
gather all of your data. If you're
buying, if you're selling, what was the
outcome, the date, the time, if you had
multiple take profits, the type of data
maybe you're collecting, the
confirmations for the entry, maybe a
screenshot of the analysis before and
after, and some notes. And this sheet
will automatically track all of your
data. You can write all of your rules
here. So you can either do it with a
Google sheet or a notion template. And
you take any charting platform. It can
be trading view. It can be deep charts.
You go in the past and you start
applying this strategy. And your goal,
your only goal is to gather data on your
hypothetical edge and eventually
optimize the strategy. So doing a
process called fitting. So for example,
you see that this strategy does not
really perform good on Mondays or on
Fridays. Maybe because on Fridays very
often some news are released in the
macroeconomic side. So a simple
technical strategy might fail. So you
decide maybe to take away that day of
the week or maybe you see that a certain
stop-loss for example a 20 point
stop-loss does not work and if you put a
30 point stop-loss then your performance
is incredibly higher. These are all
thing that you can edit and tweak, but
you should be careful about not falling
into the rookie mistake of overfitting.
As in, for example, you see that if you
sum up all of the trades from 9:46 a.m.
and 10:21
a.m., but excluding the time frame from
102
and 1004, then your strategy is
profitable. Well, I mean, you've
cherrypicked the best times to make it
profitable. You cheated, right? So, if
you do this kind of things, your
strategy will be overfitted as in it
works so well on past data because it's
only trained on past data that as soon
as you come to the next phase, which is
forward testing, won't work in the
present or out of sample data. So always
be careful about this. So just optimize
what makes sense to optimize for a clear
reason. Don't try to put your data on
steroids. So at this point, you're ready
to go to the next step which is probably
even more important which is forward
testing or out of sample test where you
basically take the optimized strategy
and try to apply it in real time to the
actual markets. And here you keep
tracking and monitoring the performance.
This can happen in a demo account or a
small real account just to get the
feeling of what it is to trade with real
money or with a small prop firm account
so that you already start training your
psychology and getting used to applying
a strategy in real time. So once you've
gathered data in the back test and
gather data in the forward test and your
strategy is profitable then you can
finally go live with your strategy. And
that comes with this whole sets of
problems that we will get deep into when
we'll talk about how to become a
proficient discretionary trader.
Everything that relates to market
psychology, how to monitor your data,
and how to actually go live. But for
anything that relates the statistical
validation protocol before going live,
this is how it works. Algorithmical
trader do this exactly the same way. And
here you have strategies that have
already gone through this process on
both in sample and out of sample data
for decades. and they consistently
outperform the market and by outperform
the market I mean generating alpha or
performing better than just buying and
holding the S&P 500. So first we will
learn these four but now you also know
how to do this process yourself and you
have the tools to do it and then on top
of this you will need to build your
discretion your intuition and your
subjective probability. So, we will
learn how to read the market action to
learn how to build a short-term
narrative through order flow and how it
interacts and causes price action. Of
course, order flow and price action are
tied together because one causes the
other and the other is the consequence
of order flow. We will learn how to
understand the rhythm of the daily money
flow and understand the impact of option
flow which is something legitimately
crazy like I I don't want to say it's a
cheat code but it's it's a cheat code.
So let's start with the first strategy
which is called the oops strategy by
Larry Williams and it's basically this
model. Let's say this is the previous
day. If the next day opens here, so with
a gap compared to the high of the
previous session and the candle breaks
inside of this level, we basically sell
here until the next candle closes with a
fixed stop-loss, for example, of a
certain number of points or above this
level. Ideally, the gap should be
minimum 20 points. Same thing here. If
it's a short candle and there is a gap
down, we wait for price to break above
and that's where we buy. This is a very
simple trading model that you can apply
in in so many different markets. I don't
advise you to just start using it. I
always suggest you to statistically
validate it yourself. So you can also
trained to look for this pattern and
trade it in a simulated environment
while gathering data as well. But this
is a statistical validation that was
made by was made by an algorithmic
trader on the DAX which is the German
stock market index. And since 2012 to
2024 it had a great performance overall.
For example, let's take this session.
This had a clear gap where the price
opened here. And as soon as we break in
this level, we can sell. So this was the
previous session high. This was the
following session open. And like this,
our short trade would be around here.
And even with a 1:1 risk-to-reward
ratio, there was this was a pretty
decent profit. And that's the first
trading model that you can start
testing. The next 3D model you can start
testing is the gap fail strategy that I
learned from Patrick Neil but has been
there also for a very long time which is
sort of similar but you basically try
and find sell opportunities before the
gap closes. So unlike the oops strategy
that goes for this trade you anticipate
that trade and try and fill the gap from
the previous day close to the next day
open. Same thing over here. If we close
the previous session here and we open
here, we want to trade the gap fill and
buy expecting that price will rise. This
also has a lot of statistical
validation. This type of pattern has
been studied for decades and it has a
clear statistical validity in the S&P
500. 65 to 70% of the gaps are filled in
the NASDAQ is even higher. So we can
take the same example and drop into some
lower time frame. This was the close of
the previous session. This was the open
of the new session. This is our gap. And
maybe here we can wait for a break of
structure. So market telling us it's
going to start dropping lower. Or we can
wait for another breakup structure and
either trade this breakout here up until
here. So more aggressively on the first
breakup structure or conservatively on
the second breakup structure with a low
risk-to-reward ratio of course. And
that's our second strategy. The third
strategy is probably one of my favorite
ones is the opening range breakout. So
you basically take the first 15minute
range and you wait for a five-minute
candle to close either above or below.
You can also add some volume analysis
here and see if this candle has a lot of
participation, but we'll get deep into
that later. This also has a very long
statistical validation. This is a back
test that a friend of mine, Luke, he's a
quantitative analyst has done, and it
outperforms the S&P 500. And remember,
this is the 15-minute opening range
breakout for the 9:30 a.m. stock market
open. So let's go to the 15-minut time
frame. This was the first 15inut candle.
We take the high, take the low, go to
the five minute time frame, and we wait
for a breakout. Breakout happens here.
Buy, place our stop slightly below the
other side. Now we're already running at
a 1:1 risk-to-reward ratio, potentially
targeting a 1:2 risk-to-reward ratio. Of
course, this works best in very
directional sessions like these ones
where you take your first 15-minute
candle, you go to the 5-minute chart,
and as soon as this, you wait for this
candle to close, sell, and this was a
very profitable day that almost reached
a 1:3 risk-to-reward ratio, and that's
the opening range breakout. The fourth
one is the rule of four by Tom Hogart.
And this only happens during NFP news
release or FOMC news release on the DAX
and on the Footsc 100 which is the UK
stock market index. So after the news
event we wait for the fourth 5minut
candle. So this is the 5minut chart and
we wait one candle, two candle, three
candle, four candle and we basically do
the same thing that we did here with the
opening range breakout but we simply buy
whenever there's a breakout here and
sell whenever there's a breakout here.
The next one is the PBD strategy by Tom
Forvvald and where you're either in an
uptrend, so you have a P. And this is
based on the auction market theory model
by the way, or you're in a downtrend and
you have a B, or you're consolidating
and you have a D. P B D. And here you
have two trend following models where as
soon as you have a failed auction here,
so price breaks out of a range and then
it breaks back inside, you wait for a
test or you buy directly until the other
side of the range. The second option is
you wait for a strong breakout and trade
the breakout. Break in breakout just
like the previous one for the swing
trading model. The other one is a
reversal setup where you basically wait
for a range to form. Price breaks out
and as soon as it breaks out again we
sell here, stop above here targeting the
beginning of the impulse. Uh here you
have the same thing but in a downtrend.
So whenever you have a failed auction
here with a break below inside, you sell
to the other side. here. If you have a
strong breakout, you follow the trend.
Or if maybe this is happening at a
previous very important zone, you wait
for a double breakout to trade the
reversal up until the beginning of the
impulse. Or if you are in a
consolidation situation, you wait for a
breakout and then a breakin on either
side to go to the other side of the
range and you do this kind of pingpong
thing. This is the track record of
Patrick Nil that used these exact setups
in the World Trading Championships. Now
you can take all of these strategies and
test them one by one and already have an
arsenal of strategies that are very
basic, very profitable and very
mechanical that does not require you a
lot of thinking at least at the
beginning. But to make these perform
even better and truly become profitable,
it's important to understand how to read
orderflow, price action, the rhythm of
the daily money flow, understanding the
impact of option flow so that we can
take these very basic setup that have a
statistical validity historically
speaking and build our discretion on top
of these. Now, in order to truly
understand this, let's start again from
the basics and kind of remind ourselves
how market mechanics work and try to
read orderflow first in its purest form.
So let's open deep chart and add a new
advanced time in sales. This is the time
in sales and it's the rawest form of
order flow you can have together with
the depth of market. So the depth of
market is showing us sell offers and buy
offers. And if these orders being
offered are actually sold to market
takers, you get the time and sales. And
time and sales basically tells you at
what time one of these orders that was
offered was taken. So if the order book
is the summary of the menu, time and
sales is the summary of what was taken
from the menu. And for example, you can
also put a filter and enable for example
a filter of minimum 25 contracts. So you
only see the big trades and this is how
it used to be done. They literally had a
tape, a physical tape that they were
reading where all of this time in sales
used to be. That's why when we talk
about the speed of the market, we also
talk about tape speed. But this was a
very raw visualization of volume which
then translated in this chart also known
as footprint charts. So as much as you
can see price ticking up and down up and
down also here this amazing chart
basically summarizes all of the orders
that were traded in the ask. So you got
the bid you got the ask. Here you got
the bid here you got the ask. All of
these were aggressive buyers who
accepted some offers on the ask. All of
these aggressive sellers accepted buy
offers made in the bid. And as you see a
lot of colors in these candlesticks, you
should know what they are. So you have
two elements. You have the colors of the
background and the color of the text
that can vary. The color of the
background is determined by comparing
the volume traded here and the volume
traded right on the side. If there was
more aggressive buy volume, this will be
green. Same like here and like here or
here for example. And here the
background is sort of purple because
there's way more volume here than here.
We also call this horizontal delta
because if this minus this is positive
will be purple. If this minus this is
positive this will be green. So it's
calculated through a differential a
delta a subtraction. The second element
as we discussed is the color of the
text. Most of it is black but sometimes
it becomes pink or it becomes blue and
it becomes a certain color if for
example compared to the other side of
the auction because typically there's a
bid and there's an ask and price goes up
and down up and down like this as you
can see here as well goes up tick down
tick up tick down tick. So you have one
bid, one ask. One bid, one ask. That's
what we call an auction, right? So
whenever there's an imbalance in the
auction of these orders, considering
only what was traded in the bid compared
to what was traded in the relative level
of the ask, if the ratio between these
two is above 200%, aka this one is two
times this one, the twice as much bigger
number will color itself with a special
color. For example, here 91 is at least
twice 92. 143 and 214 don't have that
difference. For example, 78 and 581.
Well, 581 is more than four times. So,
it will be shown even fattier and even
more highlighted. Same thing here. 221
with 37. 26 with zero is not colored
because if there's a zero, the imbalance
is not considered. 81 versus 10. Yeah,
that one is pretty bigger. 75, 120, none
of them is at least twice as much. Same
thing with 58 and 29, but 124 and 21,
there's a strong imbalance between the
two. And actually, if you go to our deep
charts website, you can see a Easter egg
that few people probably noticed, which
is this. If you hover on top, you see
exactly what I mean. When we're watching
the auction imbalance, we look
diagonally, right? So, you see auction
imbalance. You can see it in the text
over here. Auction imbalance 202%, 174,
273. It's more than 200%. So, the color
is green. Same thing over here. And the
color of these instead is based on delta
and it's considered horizontally with
these two numbers. Right? And this also
represent the total volume. You see it
here price tick total volume. And this
is for example this type of
visualization of the footprint chart.
And with these type of candles you can
see even more clearly not just the
numbers of the auction but also a little
volume profile that tells you how much
money was traded in each level. And it's
specifically with these kind of charts
that I like to trade because you can see
this type of stuff. You can see
anomalies in volume where you can see
that there was 92 contracts, 100, 100,
and so on and so forth. Pretty decent
numbers similar to the previous candles.
But on this level specifically, look at
this. 1,600
contracts traded all at the same level.
This, let me tell you, this is not a
retail trader. This is a big market
participant who was absorbing all of the
selling pressure. So probably there was
a huge order, for example, here. The
market was trying to sell into it but
couldn't make it. This order was like a
wall that price could not go through at
least at first and then price eventually
dropped. So these type of orderflow
anomalies is some things that orderflow
trading often look at. Also here for
example there were aggressive buyers
trying to buy this market but they were
completely blocked because they were
trying to buy from the ask but in the
ask there was this huge seller and
eventually price dropped. Also here
there was some sort of anomaly and this
way you can kind of track what the big
traders are doing in the market. So
let's start building a framework to
truly understand how to read these type
of chart and to do that let's help us
with another great indicator which is
orderflow values which is nothing more
than statistics then data about each
candle and these are very very simple
values regarding the orderflow of each
candle. So you have total volume here so
how many contracts were traded in this
specific candle. We have the delta of
this candle. So if the total candle
volume is the sum of all volume traded
in the ask. So aggressive buyers plus
the total sum of the volume traded in
the bid. So that equals volume. So if
you sum all of this column with all of
this column, all of these number add up
to 4,000. The delta takes all the
aggressive buyers trader who accepted
the ask minus all of these contracts
that accepted the bid. So ask minus bit
equals delta. So this is ask plus bit.
This is ask minus bit. And then you have
this number which is the delta
percentage which is basically this
number divided by this number expressed
in percentage. So 957
over 4,000 that's around 24%.
And that's this number. So how much
crowded was this candle? who was the
most aggressive participant in this
candle and how much aggressive he was
compared to the total volume. Super
super easy. And as we discussed in the
auction market theory model, we know
that there's some periods of the market
where the auction is in a situation of
balance and moments where we go in a
situation of imbalance. When we look at
footprint charts, we will define these
as responsive auctions and these as
initiative. For example, let's look at
this session on the S&P 500 on the 21st
of October. And what we saw happening
here was first a situation of balance,
then a situation of imbalance, then a
long situation of balance, and at the
end of the session, imbalance again. So,
let's look at what happened in these
candles, in these candles, these ones,
and this one. Let's zoom in and dissect
these candles. What you typically see in
slow price action and a phase of balance
and responsive auction. What you will
see is at the top of the candles a lot
of green. A lot of green here, green
here, green at the tops. And you will
also tend to see more darkness at the
bottom. Also here you can clearly see
more dark at the tops. You see a lot of
dark green. And all of this means one
thing that buyers are trying to buy into
these levels. But there's a lot of
people as passive sellers in the ask. So
a lot of people selling in this part of
the book absorbing all of this upward
pressure. That's what you call a
responsive auction because there is a
response from sellers here. And
typically what you will see in these
types of situation is an overall kind of
flat delta percentage low numbers right
1 7 8 typically below 10. And what you
will tend to see is also low volume. A
thousand contracts, couple thousand
contracts, couple thousand contracts.
Not a lot of volume going on, right? So
this is slow movement of price and slow
movement of orders. Then once we get out
of the balance, that's where you see the
volume numbers going up. So you see a
lot of aggressive volume and you see a
lot of imbalances. When you see three
levels of imbalance all at one place, we
call this an imbalance cluster. And
that's the clearest example of
initiation because sellers here are
willing to keep paying lower and lower
prices to get their hands on a buyer. So
sellers are eating every single level
and when buyers try to push up they're
again absorbed at the top absorbed at
the top and there's more aggressive
sellings with all these imbalances. Then
a phase of retracement starts and you
see we had 12 8 7,000 volumes 6,000
volumes 4,000 volumes. As soon as we go
up in the retracement part, you see that
volume kind of starts to dry out. That's
a typical thing in a phase of
retracement. In an impulse, you will see
high volume. In a retracement, you will
see kind of lower volume. Then, as much
as we move up, we start seeing more of
that patterns. At the top, more
absorption. We keep moving up and again,
what happens at the top of the candle? A
lot of dark green. A lot of dark, a lot
of dark green. We're getting responsive
again. So we can understand that all of
this area has been protected by passive
sellers. Let's see also when price comes
back here again we see the same pattern
happening. Buyers absorbed, buyers
absorbed, buyers absorbed. And the next
thing you notice is yes, we have low
volume. And as soon as we break out of
this balance and this responsive
auctions, that's when we have an
initiative candle. Boom. 1 2 3 4
imbalance cluster volume increasing. We
had 700 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 2,000.
We start getting more aggressive and
that's where we slowly slowly start
falling back down, but we're not ready
yet apparently. Let's see what happens
once we come back here again at the top.
What happens? Absorption responsiveness.
And the next thing you know is a
beautiful sell candle with 5,000
contracts. And that's where the new
trend starts. The following candle,
34,000 contracts. Look at all of this
crazy aggressive selling volume. So to
summarize order flow, we have seen that
the depth of market is basically the
menu with the bids and the ask, buy
limits and sell limits above and below
price. This is the central limit order
book, also known as the depth of market,
our menu. And then we have the time and
sales, which is basically telling us how
much volume was actually traded at every
level of price at a specific time, which
is the rawest form of actual order flow.
We can then see it through the lens of a
candlestick chart. So we can still have
our time frame candlestick with uh open,
low, high, and close levels. And on the
side having this our bid ask footprint
where on the left we have all of the
orders that hit the bid. So aggressive
sellers that accepted these buy offers
and on this side the orders that lifted
the ask or the aggressive buyers that
accepted these sell offer on the ask. If
these numbers are colored is because of
a situation of imbalance in the auction
that we calculate diagonally because we
always have one bid and one ask and the
auction follows like this. And we can
have a volume profile that is calculated
horizontally on every level of price.
And if we sum the bid and the ask we get
the total volume. If we do ask minus bid
we get the volume delta. So the net
aggression. And if we divide this by
this we get the delta percentage and
they respectively answer the question
how much participation there is who was
more aggressive if buyers or sellers and
exactly how aggressive were they and
these are the basic tools of orderflow
and we can read these tools by
remembering what the auction market
theory model looks like where we have
situations of balance and out of
balance. So ranging markets and
impulsive markets and we read a
situation of balance in the order flow
as a responsive type of auction of
liquidity where you typically have low
volume and low delta in the orderflow
values and buyers absorbed at the tops
if we're looking at the top balance. Of
course, the same thing goes for sellers
at the bottoms. If we are, let's say
here in the situations of out ofbalance
price discovery, aka these ones, that's
what we call an initiative auction that
typically has a lot of imbalance
clusters, a lot of really colorful
one-sided volume activity, aggression,
and typically higher delta and higher
participation, higher volume. And this
is how we distinguish looking at
orderflow the two different phases of
the auction market theory that we also
see in the super high time frames but
with the numbers in the shortterm
auction. Let's start for example to see
what is going on here and we can already
preview the fact that we have an
impulsive move and then a consolidation
right so we have the two phases of the
auction and to verify let's see what
happened where earlier in the auction we
had a lot of absorptions at the tops
absorption absorption absorption a lot
of greens at the top of the candles in
the top part of the range we keep going
with low volume low delta and then what
happens big candle with a lot of green
6,000 contracts high delta and the
initiation starts 4,000 4,000 3,000. You
see also this candle has a lot of green,
a lot of imbalance clustering. Keeps
going up, keeps going up, a lot of
volume. And then at some point right
over here, we find the sellers willing
to sell. So green on the top, green on
the top, a lot of green on the top. Look
at this one. 1,000 contracts in a single
cell. This is a big seller absorbing
like it's absorbing here. It's absorbing
here. It's absorbing here. 800
contracts. A lot of absorption. We keep
going forward. And here again, all these
buyers are absorbed at the tops. A lot
of green at the tops, but overall
auction volume is drying up and slowing
down. Now, this is the short-term order
flow. And we will need it to properly
understand how to analyze the market
when we day trade. But in order to do
that, let me load another important
chart that will help us understand,
let's say, the medium-term auction. Now
let's take a very clean chart and add on
top volume profile and the volume chart.
So if price is what as we said volume is
how volume is money and if we zoom out
we see that we have volume profile which
is total volume per level of price and
then we have horizontal volume or volume
by candle volume by time frame which is
the total volume traded in every single
one of these candles every single one of
these time frames. And you can clearly
see there's a rhythm in the money flow,
right? We have hours where there's a lot
of volume and hours where there's zero
to nonvolume. This is what we call the
RH or regular trading hour sessions.
Also commonly referred to as the New
York session or the cash session. And
then we have the Asian session and the
London session also commonly referred to
as electronic trading hours. And since
we are currently looking at the chart of
the ES, which is the E- mini S&P 500
future contract, which basically tracks
the S&P 500, and it's probably the most
traded future contract in the world and
one of the most traded assets
volume-wise in the world. And and this
contract, like many futures contracts,
is traded in the CME, the Chicago
Merkantile Exchange. And the trading at
the CME starts at 9:30 local time and
finishes at 400 p.m. local time or 3
p.m. local time. Anyway, in most of
these since we have this differentiation
between cash session and the rest of the
sessions, we want to mostly look at
where the most money is traded clearly.
And so we have this volume profile that
as you can see begins and ends in the
cash session and then we have a volume
profile for everything that is not cash
session. So one volume profile for the
cash session, one volume profile for
Asian and London session. And also if we
zoom into the horizontal volume chart,
we can clearly see a pattern, right? We
see there's a lot of volume in the open,
then volume dries down and then jumps
right back at the end. Also here, a lot
of volume at the start, maybe some
spikes here and there, and then one big
spike at the end. And that's the flow of
volume throughout the day. This part of
the session is also called the opening
auction. The last part of the day is
also called the closing auction. And in
both these instances, something very
interesting happens. Basically
institutional traders and you know
traders of all sorts will basically
pre-market place something called market
on open orders which is basically
contracts trades that are placed
slightly below market opens so that the
exchange can fill them during the first
few minutes of the session. The same
thing happens throughout the day. If for
example a big bank or an institution
couldn't manage to fill all of their
orders during the trading session, they
will also have markets on close orders
that will be executed all at once at the
end of the auction all at once at the
end of one cash session. And if for
example we go to financialju.com
which is my favorite uh news feed and
every trader's probably favorite
newsfeed and we go back at the beginning
of the session I am currently in Turkey.
So, the session begins at 4:30 p.m.
There you go. You have the M imbalance
or the market on open imbalance, which
basically tells you in the S&P 500,
there's an imbalance between buy and
sell of plus $14 million or shares. I'm
not sure if it's expressed in numbers of
shares, but anyway, 104 million in
market on open imbalance, which
basically mean there's 104 more buyers
than sellers. Same with the NASDAQ, with
the Dow, and with the Magnificent 7. To
be honest, this is not a huge imbalance.
But let's go back to yesterday, and you
will see that 10 minutes before the
closing of the session, we have the MOC
imbalance or market on close imbalance.
And typically, there's more volume. You
can see here S&P 500 almost a billion
imbalance. Same thing on the NASDAQ.
This is a huge positive imbalance. And
these are not necessarily reliable to
see what type of movements the market
will do in the open or in the closing
auction, but sometime they might. I'll
invite you to back test it yourself. And
then for each cash session, we have this
volume profile. And every volume profile
typically will have this colorful area
and then a gray area. This is called the
value area. And it is where 70% of the
volume is traded. Why 70% you ask? Glad
you asked. This is a bell curve also
known as the Gaussian curve because of
the mathematician that came up with it
and basically observed this sort of law
we could say that I will explain you
with an example. This is a chart
representing the distribution of penis
length in the I think US population. You
have a few people with a very small dick
and then an increasing amount of people
having averagesized dick and then a
decreasing number of people having a
bigger dick. This for example is the
distribution of male height. This
instead is the distribution of IQ in the
population of the US. And as you can
see, all of these elements in a sample
will tend to be for the 78%
within the average, a little less below
the average, and even lesser the extreme
below average or above average part. And
this happens in almost any observable
phenomenon or data sample. And so Gaus
came up with a calculation of the
distribution of probability. So how much
is the probability that a person will be
between the mean 68%. That interval is
what we call a standard deviation with
this sigma. This is minus and plus a
standard deviation. This is the second
standard deviation and this is the third
standard deviation. So within the first
standard deviation there's 68% or 70% of
the elements in a sample. 95% will be
under the second standard deviation. 99%
will be under the third standard
deviation. And well also in the volume
profile we do exactly the same thing. We
take one standard deviation of volume
see where the most volume was traded and
how statistically speaking volume was
distributed inside of an auction. And
this is a very interesting and useful
data point because we will likely see
that around these areas is where we get
with a higher probability a return to
the mean. Same over here. This is where
we're more likely to see a return to the
mean. So the level of one standard
deviation in the volume profile tells us
where it's likely that maybe in the next
session we will see price bouncing back
and up from not based on price not based
on a pattern but based on the
statistical distribution of volume in
the previous session. So this standard
deviation is also called the value area.
The upper end is called the value area
high. The lower area is called the value
area low. And then you have this line
which is not the mean exactly. It's the
mode. It's the level with the highest
concentration of samples. Also known as
the point of control, which is the
simply the level with the highest amount
of volume. All of these peaks in volume,
we will call them high volume nodes. All
of these areas with low volume, we will
call them low volume nodes, also known
as peaks and valleys. Let's take for
example this cash session. Let's take
the valary low and the valary high and
extend them. And we can clearly see that
the following session exactly respects
these levels with utmost precision. This
is because we are in a situation of
balance. And also in the following
London and Asian session, we stay in a
situation of balance because that's
where the market is agreeing is a fair
valuation, a fair price. But as soon as
we open the following cash session and
Trump maybe does some tweets. That's
where we have a bump right in the bottom
and then we break out of it, test it and
drop. And actually, if we go back, this
is exactly what happened here. This is
the volume standard deviation, the upper
part and the lower part. We drag them
forward. And here you can see we opened
here. We bounced back. We bounced back.
We tried to move out. Failed auction. We
dropped back in. Test this side and go
to the other one. This is how you use
the volume profile, by the way. And then
you can go inside of these areas. And to
time your entry, you can look at the
short-term auction. We have a phase of
responsive auction, initiative auction,
then again responsive auction. So we can
enter on the responsive auction as soon
as we get a indication. And as we see
for example when we see aggressive
seller kicking in and we trade to the
other side of the range. This is how you
follow the money inside of a daily
cycle. And as you can see these were
also the high and the low of this
current price distribution. Right? And
that's exactly where today we've had the
same sellers that out here broke out of
the range then came back tested this
area and dropped. these same aggressive
sellers that consider these prices to be
cheap enough to sell or premium enough
to sell, but at the same time not as
many buyers considering these prices
cheap enough to outweigh the selling
pressure in that same level. That's
exactly what happened here. If we follow
the money, the sellers who dominated the
previous auction at these levels kick in
again once and twice. And that's exactly
where a responsive type of auction
starts happening here. And as you can
see in the first part, we had a lot of
volume. As we approach this phase of
consolidation, volume kind of dries up.
And when does it spike again? When we
break out. So we break out, we test the
area and we go to the other side. Now
what is likely to happen? Since we are
on this side, I can for example draw
this volume profile over here. So I have
the full area and I know this is the
value area high. And this is where I
would expect sellers to consider these
prices to be premium enough to sort of
be present. And that's exactly where if
we take a lower time frame chart and
maybe draw in the tools from the other
chart. Let's see what happens here.
Well, that's exactly the area where we
were exactly seeing responsiveness.
Responsiveness again here. More
responsiveness, absorption, absorption,
and sellers getting more aggressive at
the top of the candles with these
imbalances. Now, for example, I can take
a volume profile of this area and see
that here where is where it's most
likely to see sellers joining the party
and going at least until here and maybe
have a failed auction below here or a
failed auction about here. So,
summarizing all the steps of the auction
analysis, now that we have understood
the basics of orderflow, we know that
the volume profile, it's basically the
distribution of volume and the value
area is the standard deviation. is the
first standard deviation where 70% of
the volume is traded where we have a
valer high a valera low and a point of
control which is the area and the level
specifically where most volume was
traded. The high volume nodes are peaks
in volume. The low volume nodes are
valleys in the volume profile just like
a canyon. And then we move on to the
auction analysis in the sessions. How do
the session work? We have cash session
where a lot of money is traded.
Pre-market electronic trading hour
sessions where not a lot of money is
traded. It depends on the market of
course. For example, in the DAX which is
the German stock market index, you have
much more volume here. And the regular
trading hours are here. But for the
stock market, the American stock market,
the S&P 500, this is the cash session
from 9:30 to around 4 p.m. And the
section structure is like this. You have
an opening auction, a lot of volume in
the beginning, less volume throughout
the session, and then a final burst of
volume with the closing auction and the
market on close orders. In the opening
auction, you have a market on open
orders. And in both of these cases, you
can have an imbalance that can push
price either up or down. And we can use
the levels. And when a trend is clearly
set, we can wait for a consolidation to
happen. Draw an area around the value
area high and the value area low. And in
the next few session either sell from
the top, buy from the bottom or wait for
a failed auction either up or down and
then a test to go to the other side of
the range. Either way and looking inside
of these areas how the money is behaving
to look for areas of responsive auction
and initiative auction which are
explained right here. And we can also by
the way use all of this with these
models over here. If you implement and
basically put together this together
with this, you realize it's pretty much
the same thing. And this is why I
personally consider this built by Tom
Forvville, the mentor of the world
trading champion, my mentor and also
partly Fabio's mentor as well as a
revolutionary way of understanding
market mechanics because it simplifies
everything we've seen in four to five
different patterns. And another thing
you might notice is that the session
structure of the volume is exactly what
we see here in how institution fill
their order with the VWAP logic where
there's more volume in the open, less
volume throughout the session and then
even more volume in the closing auction.
Exactly the same shape because this is
how the institutional money flows inside
of the market. And starting to observe
these situations combined with these
type of patterns. For example, we can
look for these setups and look for
confirmation with these type of
dynamics. Are we in a situation where
price can have a lot of movement because
there's a lot of volume? Maybe I'm going
to look for it in the cash session. For
example, this opening range breakout
strategy is specifically looking for the
first 15-minute candle of the cash
session and a breakout of that range
from a at least 5 minute candle. And for
example, in this previous session, we're
on the five-minute chart. Let's get the
volume going. We see this is where the
cash session start. This is the top of
the first 15-inut range. This is the
bottom of the first 15-minute range. We
have 1 2 3 5minute candle. That's 15
minutes. And for example, we can wait
for a breakout below a 5-minut candle
open closing below this low. And then we
can look for an extra confirmation with
our volume analyzer. And what do we see
here? Exactly during the breakout, we
can see a huge level of imbalance. This
is an imbalance cluster that coincides
also with the breakout below the big
value area here. And as soon as price
reaches this level, sellers clearly
start absorbing over here. So we have a
phase of absorption that continues
followed by aggressive selling. There's
a big buyer here trying to resist, but
eventually it fails. And this is a great
entry. Let's look at it from a shorter
time frame perspective. This is exactly
the area we're looking at. What we want
to see is first a responsive auction and
then an initiative auction as a
confirmation. And what do we see? Low
delta percentage 0 41. lot of green at
the top of the candle which indicates
absorption of buyers and right after
this phase of responsive auction a phase
of initiative auction increasing volume
more imbalance clusters this is the last
confirmation for our entry so we sell
here place our stop even slightly above
generously above the area and I dare to
say this was a pretty solid session I
mean this is an exemplary example so not
all session will be this awesome but
this is the same principle that we can
apply For example, here in today's
session, if we approach the market in
the exact same way, this is the first 5
minute. This is the opening range. As it
breaks out, we clearly have a long bias
for the day. But we're still below this
value error. We might want to wait until
price breaks in gives us a test here.
And here we look for longs to the other
side. Even just an a very basic opening
breakout strategy by the way here with a
stop-loss below this level would have
been profitable anyways with a lower
risk-to-reward ratio. But that's why we
want to wait for a confirmation for
example, right? So when the break inside
of this level happens, we see volume
increasing in the breakin and then
increasing again. We can check what
happened here also with this footprint
chart. You have buyers slightly being
absorbed here also here. But there's a
good momentum. Even buyers are still
absorbed here. There's a big seller
clearly here trying his best. So, what I
would personally do since it's also
doing it here, I would wait for this.
Let's say it's a guy that is constantly
blocking price from going up to be fully
walked through. And after that, these
guys won. This is a block of orders.
This is another block of orders. Another
block of orders. Another blocks of
orders. Another block of orders. Also
known as liquidity pockets. And that's
your order block, guys, because that's
where the war happens again. And we move
back up. Now I get it. This takes time
to properly master and understand. We
will make more video about this for
sure. But also in occasion of the launch
of this software which is deep charts,
me and Fabio are planning to host a boot
camp where we go exactly through this
type of strategies. And Fabio used these
exact concepts to win four times at the
World Scalping Championship. By the way,
we are still here by we're still here
where we were analyzing shortly before
and see what happens here again.
Responsive auction. Responsive auction
absorption at the top. Absorption at the
top. Now we are getting some initiative
short. So we're likely to see more
volume in the breakout typically. And
there's two options here as we're
dropping below all of these lows, we'll
see typically some aggressive selling.
And this is where I would expect some
more pump up. But if by any chance since
we are in this area and that's where
we're expecting some aggressive selling
as we discussed if we do this and then
maybe break even below here with huge
imbalance this is could be actually a
good idea for selling. If below the
breakout we have high volume and this is
basically how you can follow through
order flow and through volume analysis
the auction of markets with a very
objective understanding of the markets.
And well, look at what happened. Exactly
as we were saying, we were expecting
some bearishness. Same sellers as we
were talking about here. We had the
responsive auction here. We started with
some aggressiveness and with some 4,000
contracts. We pulled back a little bit
and then we melted down and the closing
auction has just started by the way and
we see a lot of sell orders, a lot of
selling balance. We can check if there's
have been a market on close imbalance on
the short side. So, we move all the way
up. Wow, that's a big imbalance. That's
3 billion worth of imbalance on the S&P,
1 and a.5 billion on the NASDAQ, and
we're keeping going lower apparently for
now. And now we need to understand what
happens after this candle. And this is,
by the way, the second thing that I like
to go kind of deeper that we didn't
delve too much deep into, but the real
game happened around these value areas,
right? Because as we discussed here,
these are the areas where it's
comfortable to trade for smart money
because smart money prefers slow and
liquid markets. These moments of price
discovery is where one side is stronger
than the other in the auction. And then
these failed auctions happen where
aggressive buyers keep buying higher but
aggressive sellers find this very high
so they bring price back in. So what
happens during these failed auction is
also crucial to kind of understand how
to act when a new initiation outside of
a phase of balance happens. So we can
approach a phase where price let's say
is moving high and has just created a
new situation of balance and we have a
volume distribution similar to this one.
This is the value area approximately. So
there's realistically four things that
can happen. The first thing that can
happen is that we break above and keep
going higher. Let's call this scenario
number one. Scenario number two is that
we break below and keep dropping below
the scenario two. So these are
breakouts, very normal breakouts. Option
three is price breaks out and then
breaks back in and then moves to the
other side. Another option is market
tries to auction higher but fails and
gets back into the comfort area. And of
course there's also an option where we
just bounce back from this area or
bounce back up from this area. So the
key is understanding that these areas
are the one that we need to take most
care of.
[bell] Well, apparently we closed our
day, we closed our auction and there you
go. A lot of volume in the last part of
the session. The closing auction is over
and now we have the settlement and then
a new session will begin tomorrow. So
basically this was a comfort area. This
was a big failed auction and then we
went back into balance and likely we're
going to stay here for a while. If not,
we're going to break out or let's see
back at our explanation. What we truly
want to see is how price behaves around
these areas, right? And what does it
mean on an auction level? So, the key
thing is here the buyers were dominating
the auction higher. There was a
situation of imbalance and high
initiative where we have a high positive
delta and a lot of volume. And all of
this happens because buyers are
constantly willing to pay higher prices
to get their hands on the underlying
asset. And then at some point both this
buying pressure and selling pressure
agrees that this is a fair price to
trade, right? And that's why they trade
a long time here. There's a lot of
volume of transactions. So it's
reasonable to expect at least at the
beginning in the early stages of a
consolidation that most breakouts will
fail. So in the early stages of a new
fair valuation, there's a higher
likelihood that we'll see something like
this or this. So setup three and four.
And how we want to basically trace these
is that when price is going down, of
course, there will be a burst of volume,
but then the following candles go lower
in volume. There's less and less
interest. Again, less volume. Volume
dries again. And then when we start
auctioning back inside of the range, we
see more volume coming in and an
initiation phase. This is what we call a
failed auction. And this is a good
indication that price might reverse
after this. If instead what happens
here, the same thing of course would
happen above here, but of course on the
other side. So all of these are
confirmations and then we can look
inside of the candles with orderflow to
see if we can recognize some of the
responsive auction but most of all
initiative auction when we drop back
inside of the range. So this is the
first option and this is the first let's
say trade idea right the second idea is
when we have an actual breakout. How do
we want to evaluate a breakout? Well,
what we'd like to see here and here is
ideally a situation where for the sell
setup drop lower, we drop lower with a
high intensity and high volume with a
higher participation with initiative and
intensive activity. And as we move back
to test this area, either an absorption
here, so a responsive auction from
sellers. So, we want to see the same
sellers that caused their strength. And
if they actually do that and maybe even
break below, then we know it's a
qualified sell setup. So, again, we want
to see increase in volume and again
increase in volume. We don't want to see
a dry up in volume. We want to see a lot
of activity here. Same thing over here.
As we break above the value area, we
want to see a good initiative and then a
pullback and then again either some form
of absorption here or a form of
exhaustion. So basically a decrease in
sell activity at the bottom of the
candles which is the ideal scenario and
that's already a good buy setup. And
unlike this one, this is in favor of the
trend. So we might be a little more
aggressive than this one which is a
reversal setup because we're clearly
long. And then you have these situations
that could happen. I wouldn't say
they're more rare, but I normally prefer
to wait for this to happen instead. But
this could still be a potential setup
where we wait for an absorption here and
an initiative. absorption and
initiative. So responsive plus
initiative. And these are the principles
behind for buying setups and for selling
setups that you can kind of implement
together with with this logic and that
you can even more objectify if you build
them on top of a gap fill strategy and
opening range breakup strategy and stuff
like that. So this is basically
everything you need to know about
auction analysis and order flow and the
rest you know is practice. You need to
look a lot. As I said, this is part of
building a discretionary narrative. And
you're not just going to do it by
looking at price action. You want to do
it looking at order flow, looking at
what happens behind the candles, look at
the money flow inside of the market. And
that's how then, as I said, you can
build this discretion on top of
preackaged
edges that have proven to work for a
long time to then improve your edge and
your trading. And if you together with
this you give also a context of where we
are at at the macroeconomic level. What
are the fundamentals of the asset and
what is likely the next macroeconomic
scenario. You can even align yourself
with a big long-term money flow thanks
to fundamentals with a clear
understanding on how the money is moving
and with clear strategies and models to
be able to ride the waves and serve the
waves of money by being on the right
side of the money flow with a decent
statistical edge. And I would say to get
even deeper and let's also say the final
step of this course especially since
we're talking mostly about indices
because remember that indices are
typically going up. They have these
edges that have been working for
decades. So they are very solid and we
have access to all of this money flow
but also and the reason why I like them
is because they're fully transparent not
only on the futures orderflow not only
the order flow that you can also see
through the individual stocks of the S&P
500 but the next thing the last piece of
the puzzle that you need to know to
understand properly how the daily rhythm
of the money flow is set inside of a
session is understanding the impact of
options. option flow. And in order to
understand option flow, we need to first
understand what options are. By the way,
this map is absolutely huge. Probably
the I've been shooting this video for
like weeks now. Even though you see the
same setup all the time, if you notice,
my hair and my beard kind of grew and
then they and then I cut it and you can
see the passage of time in my face.
That's crazy. So, uh, let me understand
where can I put them the option flow.
Let's put it here. So options are a very
fascinating yet complex financial
instrument and market and options are a
financial derivative just like futures
as you know you know there's underlying
assets let's say it's the S&P 500 the
S&P and you can basically have
derivatives right so we have you can
trade it to through futures you can
trade a CFD you can trade an ETF and you
can trade options on the S&P or you can
trade you know the single stocks of the
S&P, for example, the Magnificent 7 and
stuff like that. But that would be kind
of trading the underlying asset, right?
And the reason why options are so
important is that if you sum the total
volume, the nominal volume of single
stocks, ETFs, CFDs, futures on the
underlying asset of the American stock
market. All of this is combined not as
big as the option market. So the option
market is absolutely the biggest
financial derivative in the stock
market. So big that this became the
underlying asset itself which is kind of
crazy. And the flow of options contracts
that flows inside of the market. It's
part of the causes of the futures and
the underlying price movement. And you
can basically follow the option flow to
kind of spot where this type of flow
will affect the market and how. Now you
have to understand that options are a
more complicated financial instrument
right and they kind of work like an
insurance and you have two types of
option contracts calls and puts. A call
option basically gives the owner the
right to buy a certain let's say stock
for example at a price defined strike
price within a specific date also known
as the expiration. That's the call
option. The put option gives the owner
the right to sell a certain stock at a
price called strike within a specific
date. So if you buy a call is because
you want to buy. So you typically buy a
call when you expect price to rise. You
buy a put when you expect price to drop.
And why would you do that? Well, for
example, a lot of big funds are long US
equity market. So they are long stocks.
They bought stocks. So imagine for
example, you're a hedge fund. You bought
Apple at this price. Now the price is
here and you expect a retracement. You
want to kind of mitigate this draw down.
You want to hedge this draw down without
having necessarily to sell the stock and
close your trade. So what you can do,
you can buy a put option. And when you
buy a put option, you're basically
insuring yourself against a possible
bare market on the stock. So you buy the
option, literally the option of selling
it at this price. Let's say this price
is $1,000. So you would buy the put at
$1,000. And to buy this, you pay a
premium, which is the price of the
option, for example. Let's say you pay
$100. So that's what you pay. That's
kind of your stop-loss, if you will. And
if price drops and the expiration comes,
so your option expires and let's say now
price is $800. So the price has dropped
$200. When you buy a put option and
let's say for example you buy one
contract, so one option contract, one
option contract typically corresponds to
100 stocks. So 100 units of the
underlying stock. So this $200 of price
drop in the stock of Apple will be
basically your profit multiplied by 100
times. So your option at expiration is
worth $20,000 because if you were to
exercise the option of selling that
stock actually at 1,000 and you had a
100 of them, you could basically resell
it right away at the current price and
have a profit of $20,000. So you have a
leverage effect, a multiplier effect of
a 100. And so typically in options you
have something called the payoff chart
where you have the strike. So the price
of the underlying asset the stock and
let's say we were here right when we
bought the put option at $1,000 of price
of Apple. Now the price is $800. So if
normally you see price going down on the
y ais here you have price on the xaxis.
On the y- axis instead you have the p
and l. So the profit and loss. So your
payoff chart and let's say this line is
$0. So at $1,000 you paid a premium of
$100, right? So this is let's say the
negative level. This is what you paid
$100. So if the price stays exactly
where it is, that's what you will pay.
And if price by any chance goes up, so
so the price of Apple goes up, you still
paid $100. That's your maximum loss.
You're not going to lose more than that.
So even if price reaches $1,200, it does
20% up, you still lose only $100. But as
we said, as soon as price drops, you
start earning money. So you see your
profit line going up and then keeps
going up until, let's say, you reach uh
$800 and your P&L here is, as we said,
$20,000. So as soon as you buy it,
you're basically losing for a little
bit. Then you pass the break even line
and you're in profit. Potentially
unlimited profit until we reach of
course the strike of $0. And that's the
payoff chart of a put option. For call
option is exactly the same but opposite.
So let's say you are a hedge fund which
is short a stock. So you have a short
position here. Let's say you're short
Tesla at $800. But you expect the Tesla
price to kind of retrace before going
down. How do you hedge yourself from a
possible upward movement? You buy a call
option and say you buy one call. Let's
say here the price is $650. So you buy
one call at 650. So if price goes high
and let's say reaches $750, the stock
has risen of $100 times 100, your profit
would be $10,000.
So this is how the payoff chart of your
call option would look like. At 650, you
basically bought your call option and
you paid your $100. Then you're losing
until you reach the break even line. So
price goes a little bit up, a little bit
up, then it shoots up to 750. You earn
$10,000 and price can even go to zero
and you'll still lose only $100. So this
is what happens when you buy a put
option or you buy a call option. And
here you're basically, as I said, buying
an insurance against price going up or
buying an insurance against price going
down. you will truly understand the
meaning of insurance while we look at um
the Greeks what determines eventually
the price of a option. But as we said,
buying a call or buying a put gives the
buyer the right to sell or buy a certain
stock at a price within a specific date
or expiration. But how about the seller?
So if I am the insurer is the seller of
option. If you sell an option, it gives
you the obligation to buy a certain
stock at a price within a specific date
if that option is exercised. So for
example, a sell call payoff chart. If
this was the buy, what the insurer does
is he is the one earning that $100 and
he's in profit throughout all this time
and his potential loss is virtually
unlimited. So the premium that the buyer
pays is the profit of the seller. The
profit that eventually the called buyer
will be paid by the seller and the loss
could be potentially unlimited. In the
buy put pay of chart is exactly the
opposite. The profit of the put buyer is
the loss of the put sellers and the
premium that $100 that the put buyer
paid is actually the profit of the
option seller while the potential loss
is technically unlimited. Now, here I am
in my favorite option trading platform,
which is Thinkorswim by Charles Schwab.
And here you have something called the
option chain, which is a huge list of
all the options that you can buy or sell
in, in this case, the S&P 500. And you
have options basically expiring every
day of the week down until December 25
years from now, 2030. We got options
expiring on 2029, 2028, 2027, 2026, all
of 2025. And ultimately, we have these
daily options. And as you see 0 1 4 5 6
7 8 11 12 blah blah blah these are the
days to expiration. So how many days are
missing till the option eventually
expires. We also call this DTE
right days till expiration. And if I
open for example tomorrow's options this
is the option chain. How to read it very
easily? You have the strike price at the
center. So this is the prices of S&P
500. If you go all the way down, you can
see that price of S&P goes down and down
and down and down and down. As I go down
and down and down, the price goes up and
it goes up basically every five points.
660, 65, 70, 75, 80,85 and so on and so
forth. And in this side of the screen,
you have the puts. In this side of the
screen, you have the calls. And this
line here basically makes you understand
that the current price of the S&P is
between 735 and 740. As you can see, the
close of today was 6,738, which is
exactly in the middle of these two
prices. You have the bid and you have
the ask. And just like any other market,
you buy from asks and you sell to the
bid. So for both call options and put
option, as we said, you can either buy
or sell. So also here, this is basically
the order book with the best bid and the
best ask. all of these area. So where
the current price is, these strikes are
called at the money because they're at
where the price is now. So for puts,
these are at the money. These are out of
the money. These are in money. ATM, ATM,
OTM. For the calls, these are in the
money. These are still at the money. And
these are out of the money. just some
options slang you might want to know. So
we've understood what is a call, we
understood what is a put, what are their
payoff chart for the buyer and for the
seller. We've looked at the option chain
and now we're going to go to options.com
and build for example a long call. This
is a very useful toolkit for option
traders. And so we start with S&P that
is currently at 6738.
And we can choose the expiration. This
is the next day expiration expiring in
four days in five in six and so on and
so forth. If I move this you will see
behind is the price the current price of
S&P. So when I put it here it's
basically at the money and this is the
payoff chart. Let's zoom out with this
thing over here this controller over
here. And here you can see that the
maximum loss if you're long a call. So
if you buy a call and you buy one call
of S&P 500 at the money so where so
where the option strike equals the
current price of the underlying asset
your max profit is infinite your maximum
loss is capped to $2,500. This is the
price of buying a call option at the
money expiring tomorrow. If instead of
buying it at the money, so where price
is now I go at higher prices. So I go
out of the money. You see now that is
really less expensive buy a call above
the current price because the likelihood
of price being there at expiration is
really low and the chance of me making
profit is very low. That's why we call
this out of the money. If instead I were
to buy the same call below the current
price, look at this number here. As I go
lower, my chance of profit goes higher
because the price is here and my option
is way below the current price. That's
why we say it's in the money because I'm
basically trying to buy in a situation
where I'm already in profit and I have a
higher probability of closing it in
profit. But of course, that's why the
price is higher. Let's now switch to put
and do the exact same example. Now I am
at the money where the price is
currently. If I put if if I buy a put at
lower prices, there's a lower chance
that price will do all of that
excursion, right? So, my chance of
profit is really low. That's why we call
it out of the money because I'm buying
the right to sell at a lower price than
the current price. Instead, if I buy it
in the money, my chance of profit will
be higher, but I will have to pay a way
higher premium because I'm reserving the
right to sell at a price which is higher
than the current price. That's why we
call it in the money. Now let's try to
instead of buying one contract, selling
one contract. So now we're short a put.
Our chance of profit is 61% based on a
normal distribution of probabilities of
where the price will be at expiration.
Our maximum loss can be really really
high and our maximum profit will be
$2,000 which is our credit. This is of
course if I sell at the money. If I sell
it out of the money, my chance of profit
goes really really high, 96% based on a
normal statistical distribution of
probabilities of where the price will be
at expiration. My profit though will be
really really low. If I sell in the
money instead, my chance of profit is
very lower. The profit I will take is
much higher. Now I'm selling a call. And
if I sell it, my chance of profit will
be really high, but my maximum loss can
be infinite. Technically speaking, if I
stay in the money instead, my chance of
profit will be lower, but my max profit
will be extremely high, even though the
loss can be technically still infinite.
And the cool thing about option is that
I can buy and sell multiple legs as we
say. So let's say now I'm short a put. I
can also sell a call. And what will
happen is something really interesting.
This is called a short straddle. In this
way, I'm basically betting that price
will stay within this range. And if it
stays within this range, I'm making
money. If not, I'm losing a lot of
money. So, it's more than so more than
betting on price going up or price going
down. I'm betting on the fact that
volatility will be low. If I buy them
instead at the money, I'm basically
betting that price will be volatile and
exit either from one side or the other.
I don't care because I'll make money
either way. So these are nondirectional
strategies because it doesn't matter
where price goes if up or down. It
matters that is very volatile and we
still didn't get into the real sauce
yet. But you can already start
understanding that being able to bet on
volatility gives you a much wider range
of ways to express yourformational
advantage or your statistical edge. And
that's why so many professional traders
or investors approach options. I
strongly advise against trading options
as a first thing to begin with because
they're more complicated as we will see
now. So don't just jump into options
without knowing what you're doing
because as we said, especially if you're
selling naked puts and calls, the max
loss can be unlimited. But now you at
least understand why so many
institutional traders go for options and
why they're such a big market because
they're traded in really high volume.
plus every single one of these contracts
equals 100 times the underlying asset.
Now let's make an example. Let's say you
are an insurance company selling and
let's say you sell fire insurance. And
for this fire insurance, of course,
you'll charge a premium. And let's
imagine two scenarios. In one scenario,
you're close to a forest and a fire has
just started and it's a very dry season.
In the second scenario, you're in a
desert in Siberia and there's no signs
of fire around. Which one of these
insuranceances will be riskier for you?
So, you will have to charge a way higher
premium to ensure someone against a
fire? Well, of course, this one. Why?
Because this has a high probability of
happening. This instead has a low
probability of happening. Now, let's add
another scenario on top. Let's say this
fire insurance covers you for 10 years.
This other fire insurance covers you for
5 days. Well, in 10 years a lot of stuff
can happen. You want to charge a higher
premium. In 5 days, there's a lesser
probability that a big fire will happen.
So, you'll charge less. So, there is a
time component to insurance risk. So,
there's two factors. The implied
probability of an event happening and
you have a time component. The same
thing happens also with financial
options. The implied probability of an
event happening is the implied
volatility and the time component is
also referred to as time decay. These
are two very important components of how
we calculate the price of an option. If
the implied volatility is high, the
premiums will be higher because there's
a fire happening inside of a forest. If
the implied volatility is low because
we're in a desert means that the market
is not expecting huge price movements
then the premiums will be lower and
through time as we've also seen for
longer expirations the premium will be
higher for short-term expiration the
premium will be lower and of course if
we're talking about financial markets as
we have seen with at the money in the
money out of the money the underlying
price is also a factor. So we have
implied volatility, time decay and
underlying price. All of these three
things contribute to the variations and
the fluctuations of price of an option
and and the profit or the losses you
will incur. And there is a model called
the black and schles model. Hope I write
that correctly which basically takes
into consideration these calculate the
price of the so-called European style
options. I'm not going to get deep into
that now. And these three factors can be
summarized in what we call the option
Greeks. Greek letters called delta,
vega, and theta. Then to be honest,
there's also a another factor that I
wouldn't say it's less it's sort of less
important or less, let's say, affecting
the day-to-day uh option pricing
movements, which is so-called risk-free
interest rates. So, a part of the price
of the option is also influenced by, for
example, the central bank's interest
rates. The Greek of this is the raw.
just know it for now. But delta, vega,
and theta are way more important. And
and delta basically answers the
question, how much does price of my
option change given a one point movement
the price of the underlying asset. So
for example, if the price of S&P 500
goes up from here to here five points,
how much does the price of my option
change? Let's go back to option strat.
And you have to know that this chart is
payoff chart once the option is expired.
But as I buy it, I still didn't mature
my premium cuz price is still exactly
where it was and no time has passed. So
if I bought a call option now and resell
it right now, I would be at break even.
And as you can see, make it even wider
to make it more obvious. First, when I
buy a call at the money at lower prices,
at lower prices of the underlying asset,
this line is not really changing, right?
Then you go up and it start changing
fast. Then it goes up. And if I were to
ask you how fast is this curve rising,
which basically means as the price of
the underlying asset goes up, how does
my profit and loss go up? We would
probably say that this is rising pretty
slow, basically flat. And then it start
rising faster. Look at this. Start
rising faster. It start rising faster.
And it start rising faster because we're
going more and more upwards. We're
rising faster. We're rising faster. and
we basically plateau at around 45
degrees right in fact if I take the
chart of the delta that's exactly the
type of curve you will see at first the
curve was flat then it started reaching
high and then it started going straight
right so if this curves measure the
speed at which profit and loss goes
higher this is how it would look like
when we are at the money as you can see
the delta is 50 so every one point of
underlying price movement the price of
my option will go up by $50 let's go
back to the profit and loss. Now, my
option is worth, let's say, zero. Let's
say I move around 20 points later. 20 *
50 is exactly $1,000, which is my
profit. So, price moved 20 points. My
profit went up $1,000. $1,000 divided by
20 points is exactly 50. That is my
delta. If I click on delta, that's
exactly 50. I hope that's clear. The
Vega answers, how much does the price of
an option change given a variation in
the implied volatility, which means the
volatility that the market expects it to
be there. Let's make an example. We
bought a call. We bought an insurance
against a fire happening. And let's say
the implied volatility, which is the
probability the fire will happen, starts
spiking all of a sudden. Well, now my
insurance is worth way more because
there's a fire going on. So, I can now
sell this insurance back to someone else
in this market for a profit because the
implied volatility, the implied
probability that that event will happen
is extremely high. Same thing if we
bought a put. If the implied volatility
is low, then my insurance on on the fire
is not going to be worth much. But if
the fire starts, that's where my option
my insurance is valuable. And then, of
course, you have time decay. As much as
time goes forward, my option at the
money is worth less and less. This is a
chart of the Vega and how it's impacting
prices. And as you can see, it follows.
We have this line, right? We have this
line. And then we have the distribution
of probabilities. As soon as the implied
volatility increases also, the
distribution of the probabilities that
price will stay in that range is lower
and lower and expands the range where
price is likely to be. And the influence
is really high before expiration. But as
soon as we get closer and closer to the
expiration, the impact of volatility on
the price of the option will be really
low because even though there's a fire,
the option is about to close. So it will
just interfere with all the other
strikes until it finally dissolves.
Theta instead there's a huge a effect at
the money at the beginning is kind of
low then it increasingly higher and
higher and more important at the money
than it is in the money out of the money
and then eventually disappears because
the time is officially decayed. So theta
answers the question how much does the
price of an option change through time
and all of this is crucial to understand
if we want to understand the impact of
option flow in the underlying market and
also understand some reason behind the
intraday movements of stocks and in
order to truly understand it we need to
introduce one last Greek which is a
second great Greek because it's a Greek
derived from another Greek because from
the delta we can calculate the gamma and
the gamma answers the question how much
Does delta change given a onepoint
movement in the price of the underlying
asset? So, back to option strat. Let's
recap what the delta was. We said that
the delta was measuring how fast this
line goes up, right? And as we said,
it's not going fast at all here. Then it
starts to go faster, then faster up,
faster up, faster up, faster up until it
basically goes at the same speed up,
right? So this is kind of the measure of
the speed of the profit and loss line
and that's delta, right? But now we can
do the same thing here and say for
example, how fast is this rising up?
Well, here is pretty slow. Then it start
going faster up. Here we're at the
maximum speed and then the speeds get
slower, right? So we're not going so
fast anymore. And that in fact is the
chart of gamma. It's measuring the
change of the delta through price. So
recapping real quick, we've understood
what options are. We've understood how
the payoff chart works. What's the
option chain? And with an example of an
in of a fire insurance, we've understood
what's affecting the price of these
insuranceances, quote unquote. The
underlying price, of course, the implied
volatility or how likely is there going
to be a fire? Time decay until how far
am I insuring myself against a fire and
hence theta how much the price of the
option changes through time. How much
does it changes if the fire actually
starts the delta is how the price of my
option varies through price and gamma
measures how delta varies through price.
I really don't think you can find an
easier explanation this stupid easy
explanation of option creeks on the
internet. You don't even need to
understand all the mathematics behind
it. And now we can finally introduce the
option markets participants. And also
here in the option markets you have
three main participants. You have hedge
funds, big speculators, you have retail
traders, you have investors in general
and also here you have market makers.
And if investor might just use it for
hedging their let's say positions on
stocks, there's some big smart money
participant that will use it to
speculate. Retail traders also will use
it to speculate and market makers will
use it as always to earn a spread just
like the market makers we saw on
futures. Remember when we explained the
types of matching algorithms and how
lead market makers are basically earning
a bid ask spread which is the spread
between the best ask and the best bid.
That's the spread. This guy. Well, we do
have a bid ask spread in options as
well. If we zoom into the option chain,
this is the bid and the ask of call
options. If you want to buy, it's going
to cost 5150. You want to sell, it's
going to be 5250. So this $1 spread is
the profit of the market maker that is
both putting an order here, putting a
buy offer here, and putting a sell offer
here. And he's not just doing it for
this strike. He's doing it for every
single strike. So he's earning a spread
from here, from here, from here, from
here, from here, from here, from here,
from here, from here. And not just from
calls, but also from puts from here,
from here, from here, from here, and all
of these little lines. Isn't that crazy?
So, you can start to understand how
complicated this all is. And because of
the nature of these contracts and theta
and Vega and Delta and gamma,
considering that market makers only goal
is to be directionally neutral, so to
not have a directional exposure. Because
as we said before, if price were to rise
and they were to keep selling here,
selling here, selling here, they would
keep selling at worse and worse and
worse prices and they would lose. Also
in options, they want to stay
directionally neutral. But we have to
consider more factor in the calculation
on of how do we stay neutral. Let's make
an example. Let's say a retail traders
buys a put market. In this case, the
market maker will sell a put on the ask
because the market maker's job is to
provide liquidity. So this will be the
profit and loss chart of the retail
trader who bought the put. The insurer
will be the market maker in this case.
So this will be the payoff chart of the
market maker. So the market maker if
price starts going down he will lose
money. If price starts going down he
will lose a lot of money. So what often
market makers will do is to hedge for
example if they are shortput they might
at the same time to hedge this danger
that they might start losing money for
example sell one contract of the ES
futures. Imagine the profit and loss of
a futures sell position as price goes
down. The profit and loss of a ES one ES
contract will be like this, right? And
would probably be green. So it will be
something like this. So the profit from
shorting the ES and the loss from having
shorted an S&P option basically offset
each other. So the directional exposure
is flattened. So when the market sells
this put, she will also have for example
to sell at ES futures to neutralize this
exposure. Same thing if this was a call,
he has just sold a call and if price
goes high, he's losing money. So what
can he do? He can for example buy one ES
contract and as price rises also his
profit will. So this will be his profit
line. So he'll make profit here
offsetting this loss over here. So if
market makers are mostly short call,
they will have to buy while market is
rising. And if they're short put they
will have to sell when market is falling
but they will not do it systematically.
So one point one contract one point one
contract. Nope. Because remember we have
a delta to consider because if I just
sold this option at the money my
directional exposure is not uniformly
going down at the same pace. Here I have
basically no directional exposure. Here
I slightly start having a little bit of
directional exposure and having it more
and more. So maybe here I could sell one
ES contract. Here I maybe should sell
two. Here I should sell three. So it's a
type of dynamic hedging because the
directional exposure is not uniformed
through price because of gamma and
delta. That's why we call the hedging
activity of market makers dynamic delta
hedging. And the activity of dynamic
delta hedging from options market maker
creates a flow that we also call hedging
flow inside of the future market. And
there are rough estimates around this.
But I would say that depending on the
day 10 to even 20% of the volume that
flows inside of the futures market,
which is the same orderflow that we read
with the footprint chart that we have
just learned, where the [ __ ] is it? that
we see inside of the footprint chart on
the ES actually comes from here, right?
And as we said, if their short call or
short put and they want to be delta
neutral, as we said, if price falls,
they have to sell ES futures to hedge
themselves. So, they can earn money
while price goes down by shorting ES
future contract. So they will sell the
dip and if their short call and price
falls they have to dynamically hedge
their delta by buying ES to offset this
loss with this profit to stay neutral
and so they will keep buying as price
rises. So they will also buy the RIP. So
if price is rising they will buy into
it. If price drops they will sell into
it. This means that they will contribute
to the expansion of price volatility.
This could for example mean that
breakouts will have a a gentle push from
option market makers. But what if a
trader or an institution or whoever is
being the counterpart of the market
maker, let's say it's an institution
sells put market. Well, the market
banker will buy that, right? So now this
is the profit and loss of our option
market maker right and they want to stay
delta neutral right they don't want to
be exposed to any kind of direction even
if it's in profit so if they are long a
put and price drops they would buy an ES
contract which will basically lose them
money so they can basically offset this
profit as well because they don't want
to be directionally exposed period
doesn't matter if it's a profit or a
loss so here price is dropping and they
dynamically keep buying to offset their
exposure. Same thing if they bought a
call to offset this directional positive
exposure, they will sell a future
contract which will basically go to a as
a loss position. So this loss will
offset the directional exposure from
this profit and they will be delta
neutral. So as price keeps rising,
options market maker will keep
dynamically selling. So they will sell
when price goes up and buy when price
goes down. So if they're either long
call or long put, they will buy the dip
and sell the rip. So when price is
falling, they will buy and contributing
to pushing it up. If price is rising,
they will sell and they will contribute
to pushing it down. So this will
contribute to the compression of price
volatility. And for a breakout trader,
for example, we will have the exact
opposite effect of this that breakouts
will not have a gentle push but actually
more of a gentle pull back. And the
first study on gam exposure was proudly
presented by squeeze metrics, an amazing
website where they display three main
data points. the S&P 500, the darkpool
index, which basically measures the
darkpool activity, and the GAM exposure,
which I shortly introduced to you
earlier, but let's see, because they've
made this research paper that I strongly
suggest you watch and read, where they
basically analyze the role of options.
They've done this in probably 2017. They
talk about this dynamic hedging. And of
course, this idea of options hedging
starts with four assumption. First is
that all trades and all traded options
are facilitated by delta hedgers. So by
option market makers. So all retail
traders, all institution all buy and
sell from and to option market makers
which is an assumption. Probably most
trades are but in order to proceed with
the hypothesis we have to start with
some assumptions. Then the other
assumption is that call options are sold
by investors bought by market makers.
Put options are mostly bought by
investor because they want to hedge from
price going down specifically because
investors mostly invest in the stock
market and they buy puts to avoid price
going down, right? And so they buy put
options and market makers mostly sell
them. So the idea is that market makers
mostly sell puts and buy calls. And the
other assumption is that the market
makers hedge precisely to the option
delta. So they basically created this
formula for the calculation of gamma
exposure based on the open interest of
options and they've calculated the total
gamma exposure and display it with a
number expressed in billions of dollars
[clears throat] and compared the gamma
exposure if it's a negative number. It's
a short gamma exposure which basically
means they've sold puts and sold calls.
So they as we said contribute to price
volatility. If the gamma exposure is
positive, it means they are long gamma
or mostly long calls and long puts and
they will buy the dip and sell the rip
contributing to price compression and
the compression of volatility. And we
can clearly see there is a direct
correlation between gam exposure and
volatility. So the GAM exposure of the
previous day from 2004 to 2017 was a
direct indication the likelihood of the
following day of the S&P 500 being super
volatile with returns of 5 10 + 5 + 10%
all the way down to - 5% - 10%. So huge
volatility and in case of a long gam
exposure a compression of volatility
with all the samples staying below the
5% range way closer to the 0% range. So
they have actually found a real
correlation between these two. Now this
was a great indication before 2017 when
this was published but after 2017 there
was a a huge change in the option market
and what started changing since 2017 is
that the zerodte options so the daily
options the options that expired today
starting 2017 and especially 2019 they
saw a huge surge in volume activity also
in 2019 it was the first time where
zerod options were present for every day
of the week. So for Monday, Tuesday,
Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday. Before
there were just three per weeks. And so
today, or better 2024, now it's probably
more. Half of the volume of the entire
option market is traded in zero DTE
options, which is [ __ ] crazy. So my
and Fabio's mentor, Enri Costuki, was
kind enough to basically recreate this
data analysis and update this
scatterplot chart with more recent data.
And maybe because we've been a lot more
in a bull market, there's been way less
days of gam exposure of totally negative
gam exposure based on the open interest.
The correlation is still somewhat there,
especially if in the data we include
days getting back until 2000 until 2011.
But specifically because of this extreme
skew in the volume where most of the
volume is traded in the daily options
there's not much open interest and
considering that this gam exposure was
calculated on the open interest there's
not a lot of open interest in zt options
because they expire today so there's no
open interest at the end of the day plus
this assumption which is that all traded
option are fac facilitated by market
makers they're always buying calls and
selling put is somewhat naive That's why
their calculation of the GEX is also
called the naive GEX. So some new tools
started popping up. The most famous of
which is spot gamma. And spot gamma is
is an absolutely phenomenal tool. You've
also might have seen Fabio using one of
their indicators. I personally look at
trace a lot because trace basically
displays on this chart the zero DTE GX
per strike. So again here we have long
gamma and here we have short gamma. So
these are negative levels of gamma
exposure that you can also see in this
map and then you have big long gamma
levels that are then plotted in this
part of the chart in purple. Then again
super hot area short gamma again in this
pinkish color. I call it the hot fire
and the cold fire and the hot fire
again. And so this is even better than
this. you you don't have just the open
interest of the day before and you know
that the day after is going to be
volatile. Here you have literally the
areas at which market makers of options
are likely to hedge their delta by
compressing volatility or hedging delta
by expanding volatility. So you will
often see throughout these cold kind of
areas price actually is consolidating
while the spikes of volatility happen
exactly here in the hotter areas and as
soon as price will break out of this
area you start seeing a clear direction
and by the way you can take this and
beck test it I don't know for until how
long but this is a huge data point and
also this is not simply calculated on
their short puts and their long calls
but it's basically taking more
specialized data a more specialized
option flow from the CBOE that either
tells this software directly what the
options market makers are actually doing
or uristically calculates it based on
where trades are getting filled. So at
which price between the best bid and the
best ask because sometimes they can be
also filled mid-pric. So for example, if
they're filled at the bid and at the ask
there's a higher chance that they will
be market maker. If they are filled in
the middle, they could be also other
traders. So there's more complex. So in
these type of charts, there's more,
let's say, accurate information than a
mere naive version of the old open
interest gs. And with this, my friends,
we have a clear picture of literally
every type of information that we can
get about the markets from the
fundamental perspective because of the
macroeconomical reasons of the money
flow and the way we can use it to assess
the long-term trend and sentiment to
some basic strategies that you can also
use in the intraday to the order flow
that moves price intraday with the
auction analysis and the liquidity
auction theory to understanding why
option market makers are such a huge and
important player not only in the option
market but because of their hedging
activity of the same order flow that
we're looking at in the S&P 500 which is
of course probably the most transparent
market of all. Hence why I always prefer
to trade the S&P 500 or the NASDAQ
because unlike other markets like forex
for example that have no sign of order
flow let alone option flow stock market
indices are just a much more transparent
market to trade where we have more
information and lessformational
asymmetry with other market
participants. So now if you're a swing
trader, you can take macroeconomics and
fundamentals to create a bias for swing
trades and have a very strong model
based on the fundamental reasons of the
money flow on the participation analysis
with the coot report and the liquidity
auction theory for the technical timing
of these setups. If you're a day trader
now, you have also five strategies that
you can use. Four which are much more
mechanical and that have years of data
backing them up, plus a full-fledged
orderflow reading methodology with an
integration of option flow so you can
truly follow all the big and smart money
in the markets. Oh my god, this was the
longest video I've ever made in my
entire life.
So, did you like it? So, I really hope
you did because I literally put all of
everything I know is in this document
basically.
I have to think of a cool conclusion for
this video. Yeah, I would suggest you to
do a lot of back test. I understand it's
a lot to process. I need you to rewatch
this video multiple times and I
specifically need you to practice this.
It's going to take time to become a
professional trader. This video probably
just helped you realize how much you
didn't know about the markets. And
please, please compare this video with
any other complete beginner trader
course that you see out there and look
at the [ __ ] gap. So, as I was saying,
I need you to re-watch this video
multiple times and go again through it
bit by bit. I'll make sure to put all
the chapters of the video and I strongly
advise you to keep following the
channels because we will go even deeper
on all of these concepts even in a more
practical way so you can also truly
grasp all of this information bit by bit
and have the time to digest it and
gradually transform it into a very
powerful edge. But knowledge is just the
beginning. There's a way deeper video
that needs to be made that I will do on
everything that relates to the mindset
of trading. And it's not as simple as,
hey, there is FOMO. Don't be fearful.
Don't be hopeful. And respect your
trading rules and focus on the process.
Yes, those are all amazing and very
valuable tips, but the way we take
trading decisions is subconscious at
some levels, and there's much to be told
about it. So, I will keep that for a
future video. That's why again, if you
haven't done it already, subscribe to
this [ __ ]
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.