Joe Rogan Is In Damage Control Over The Epstein Files

That's a very specific illicit desire

>> to want underage people.

>> Well, I

>> a very How do you even find out that

someone's into that? Well, I don't think

that the majority or anything close to

it of of the women were technically I

think it was largely

>> very young um you know barely legal so

to speak but and I know that there were

cases of underage but I you know I think

>> most of it was just

>> most of it was just very very young but

not

>> not like 20y old not like 13y old type

thing and then yeah remember because

this is an international enterprise and

many of the clients are like

uh you know in countries that don't

necessarily have the same norms about

that

>> that we do. Um you can very easily see

someone getting involved in that just

because girls juice deals.

>> All right, so the Joe Rogan experience

is just getting sad at this point. It

feels like it's turned into a PR tool

for the Epstein clients after maybe the

biggest file drop yet Joe had on Mike

Benz who is a Elon Musk lackey. So, of

course, there's no mention of Elon

during this podcast, even though his

emails are one of the biggest

revelations from the Files, which now

Elon, you know, Mr. Free Speech is

threatening to sue people for talking

about it or even associating him with

the Files. I'm sure Joe will have a lot

to say about that. No, I mean, Rogan is

cooked. People used to look forward to

hearing him talk about stuff like this,

but now he's way too connected to people

involved with Epstein, so he has to

ignore and downplay a lot of the

information coming out. Also, a lot of

his guests work for or are associated

with people in the Epstein files as

well, so he rarely hears an unbiased

perspective on them. I mean, if he

really wanted a good rundown of the

recent file drop, he'd have on somebody

like Coffeezilla. Like, he's probably

done the best reporting on it, and he's

impartial. You know, he has no incentive

to protect anybody. So, he'd be the best

person to hear from. But instead, Joe

talked about the recent files with Mike

Benz, who's part of the establishment.

He worked for the government. He worked

under Trump's first administration and

he panders to Elon Musk. So, this guy is

not an objective source at all when it

comes to the Epstein files. And during

this podcast, he spent a lot of time

trying to downplay, but also almost

justify the child sex trafficking

allegations and convince people that it

wasn't a blackmail operation, which

Rogan barely pushed back on. Like, he

used to say, "It's a pedto island with

cameras everywhere. They have dirt on

all these high-profile people, but now

it's like, were they really underage

girls? Is there a blackmail operation?

>> And Jeffrey Epstein, you know, for the

past three years of their lives has been

the best weekend they've ever had. Has

uh, you know, is made them feel alive

again in their, you know, mid-50s or

60s. Has, uh, you know, has opened all

sorts of other deals for, you know, for

them. And this deal might work out. So,

uh, if I I'm afraid that if I say no to

Jeffrey Epstein on this deal, I'm not

going to get an invite to the next

party. I'm not going to be able to get

laid again with

>> in the public eye. The narrative is

underage girls. And this is the thing

that makes it so disgusting. When people

talk about it, everyone says kids on the

island. This is the this is the the the

big conspiracy about it. And this is the

reason why people are so outraged about

it.

My concern with the runaway train on

that is that um

it's a massive manhunt for something

that it may be true to me. It's a it's a

it's a needle in the hay stack. It might

be true. Good luck looking for it. It

would seem

ludicrous to me that Epstein

doesn't mean it's impossible,

but logistically if Epstein ever

directly threatened someone

um proactively, that is if the person

tries to blackmail Epstein, Epstein

could, you know, reactively say, "Well,

I've got I've got [ __ ] on you, too." but

proactively and really really do someone

in like that and word gets around that

that happens.

Everything everything he built goes the

whole Rolodex finds out.

>> So it sounds like he's trying to

convince people it's not really worth

looking into the underage trafficking

and blackmail aspect of the files. But

then he'd go on these long- winded

monologues about the more important

aspects of it and he'd just be all over

the place. like he'd be talking about

Epste then jump to like 10 other topics

and people in the comments are just like

I've never heard someone say so much

without saying anything and Rogan posted

a clip of them talking about the Epstein

files to the JRE clips channel and all

the comments are negative calling Rogan

a sellout and saying he's compromised

and trying to do damage control because

there's so much new information from the

recent files release and it seems like

Joe and his guest didn't talk about any

of that and instead his guests try to

convince people that it's not really

worth looking into the child trafficking

aspect of it. you know, the most heinous

part of the files isn't worth looking

into. So, we used to hear Epstein had

compromising tapes and pictures on all

these high-profile people. You know, his

whole house was rigged with cameras, but

now Rogan's Guest is trying to convince

us that there was none of that because

word would get out. He tries to say if

Epstein told someone he has dirt on

them, they'd go running and tell their

wife, which just sounds ridiculous. You

know, if Epstein told someone he had a

video of them molesting a kid, I don't

know if they'd want to go tell someone

about that, especially their wife. Also,

he's like, "Nobody's even ever claimed

they've been blackmailed by Epstein."

But again, why the hell would you admit

that? Why would you want to tell anybody

if you were? And I'm sure a lot of the

blackmail is implied. Like Epstein

didn't really have to threaten many

people because you just assume if you're

at an Epstein party, there's probably

video of it. I've never been convinced

that the central role of the Epstein

young girl uh

in my view sidebar of of the Epstein

money laundering story is uh is that it

was for blackmail. I and part of this is

because the moment Jeffrey Epstein

formally

officially threatens somebody with

blackmail and that person tells his wife

and that wife tells her friends and that

gets out to somebody else that knows

Jeffrey Epstein,

Jeffrey Epste's access goes away

overnight. That's the sort of thing that

even a rumor of that spreading and

nobody else is going to want to do

business with them.

>> So, you think people just assume it's

blackmail because that is how you would

blackmail someone, especially underage

girls? I think it is very possible that

there could have been indirect

blackmail, meaning Epstein passes it on

to an intelligence service to uh, you

know, to a corporate espionage client or

something. But even then, I mean,

imagine for example, if you know, like

on the Bill Gates thing, like there was

an e, you know, Bill Gates gets an

email, I have a video of you sleeping

with this person and, you know, or

somebody much lower level, the moment

they send that to the press, if you

know, in order to they figure they have

nothing to lose. I mean, there's not

been anybody in the seven years that's

transpired who said, "I've been I was

personally blackmailed by Jeffrey Eps."

I think cuz the moment you do that,

nobody comes to your parties anymore.

Nobody. You lose all the access. You

lose all the deal flow.

>> And it's funny he mentions Bill Gates

because that's an example where it looks

like Epstein was definitely trying to

blackmail him. Like Epstein was trying

to hold that prostitution story over his

head to get him to do business deals,

which was one of the biggest takeaways

from the files. So, it's weird. Now he's

trying to tell us that there was no

blackmail when we basically got proof of

it from the recent files. And it's also

weird he's trying to convince us that

there wasn't much trafficking of

underage girls going on because he also

at the same time talks about how the

societal norms and laws are different in

other countries so it isn't as frowned

upon to be with young girls. Like

implying that maybe he did traffic young

girls but he was facilitating them to

people in other countries where it isn't

as big of a deal. Like he compared it to

this other company that was working with

the US government. It was trafficking

underage girls to high-profile people in

the Middle East. And their defense for

it was the government wanted them to

help facilitate deals and this was the

best way to go about it.

>> US military and CIA contractor for

logistics and uh you know institutional

support and military assistance uh on

the ground for the US military all over

the world. They got in trouble uh moving

basically trafficking underage kids to

Middle Eastern shakes. And I believe the

reason that was alleged by Congress

that they did that was to juice the

deals with them. That in order to

serve your purpose for the US government

to be this outside plausibly deniable

but extensively infrastructured

professional support outfit on the

ground. You need the support of the

local government. You need the support

of the local high level officials. They

need to be happy. And there's several

currencies for that. There's financial

payoffs. And there's other things they

might like parties and young women. Uh

you know, especially in places where,

you know, being with the very young

female is not illegal. And so what I I

believe their argument was, well, you

wanted us to do this thing on the

ground. you wanted us to help the US

military and you know kind of covert

support nodes that were that were

happening here. Uh we had to do it

somehow. You know this is part of what

helped us do that. I would not be

surprised if the Epstein

trafficking

apparatus started

with similar motivations. not you know

that it's not for necessarily for

blackmail but because it makes clients

or customers or you know VIP people

happy. It makes that it makes them owe

you something. It makes them want to get

involved in a deal you do. And then

yeah, remember because this is an

international enterprise and many of the

clients are like

uh you know in countries that don't

necessarily have the same norms about

that

>> that we do. Um you can very easily see

someone getting involved in that just

because girls juice deals. And so I I

don't think that Epstein

I've not seen evidence and

in my view you don't need any of that to

understand the core part of the Epstein

story that is relevance to to your life

today in terms of your own government

and the workings of power and corporate

finance and the like.

>> So this is what the Joe Rogan experience

has turned into. It's crazy. And he'll

probably just ignore Elon's emails and

all the relevant information in the

files. you know, now he's got to be

really careful when he has on his

comedian friends because they usually

just go off about this stuff and don't

hold back. I mean, it seems like every

episode he does now with Theo Von, Tim

Dylan, or Kurt Mezer and he gets really

uncomfortable and tries to change the

topic a lot because he doesn't want to

upset his tech friends and his friends

in the government who are all over the

Epstein files. But hopefully I'm wrong.

Maybe he'll surprise me and have on

someone like Whitney Webb or

Coffeezilla, but I doubt it. I think

he's in too deep. Let me know what you

guys think about it, though. and check

out the Patreon if you want to hear

about how Rogan's guests keep exposing

him for selling out to Elon Musk and

Peter Teal and helping do damage control

for Epstein Associates. I've been

covering that for a while over there.

There's a ton of videos about that. And

also a few months ago, Theo Von exposed

Tucker Carlson for being a teal shill as

well, which was hilarious. And there

over 160 exclusive videos on there, and

I post a new one every single week. So,

if you're a fan of the channel and you

want extra content, it's definitely

worth it. I'll put a link in

description.