Whistleblower Alleges ABC Debate RIGGED [Trump vs Harris]

keep in mind allegations that this

debate was rigged started the moment the

betting Markets started implying that

Donald Trump was losing the debate now

those are betting markets they could be

manipulated as well and they fluctuate a

lot and yes Kamala has pulled ahead in

the betting markets uh but some of the

first rumors that we heard were that

kamla Harris was wearing an earpiece and

she was being fed information about what

to say or zingers to say uh potentially

even wearing navo earrings that had like

a little speaker on

them we're going to get into this

whistleblower complaint here but that's

major high risk you lose one of those

they fall down and it's just like

blatant evidence of

cheating uh it would be really bad I

don't think that's worth the risk I

think she had plenty of debate prep and

Donald Trump just didn't prep as well as

he should have but let's listen to these

new whistleblower allegations to see if

there's any potential credibility here

and what we should pay attention to

there is now a serious allegation

circulating that could totally be fake

news but we need to address it there's

an allegation now circulating that

somebody claiming to be an ABC

whistleblower is going to quote before

the weekend release a signed affidavit

to allege that the Harris campaign

received or helped to draft the policy

questions and debate questions that were

asked pass on the debate between Trump

and

Harris and that Harris was promised not

to be F checked if she went on the ABC

debate we have a lot to unpack here so

let's go ahead and start with where this

speculation and rumor is coming from and

then I'm going to give you my opinion on

all of this keep in mind it is coupon

code expiration day it actually expires

in like 2 hours because we're doing for

some reason we decided to do a 600 p.m

and California time for it over at

meetkevin.com you know the drill you get

lifetime access you pay once you get to

find out my multi-million dollar trade

soft Landing or recession it's not a

short it's not a short it's actually a

long position it's not a short uh and

it's also not a bet against the q's for

example or any individual stock uh

that's why I think it can do well uh

when uh when and if we have a recession

I think it'll do extremely well and if

we don't have a recession I also think

it'll do well but obviously there are

ways it could do poorly as well and if

you want to sort of watch my uh

positions change over time and discuss

them with the course members you pay

once you get lifetime access forever and

you're guaranteed to get the lowest

price so as these sales expire the price

just goes up over time all right so Bill

anman quote tweeted this and this is

where I saw it Bill Amman tweeted if

this turns out to be true this is a

serious breach of journalistic ethic

eics and a death blow to the ABC Network

reputation so at least bill lman is

acknowledging that it could potentially

not be true which that is something we

have to consider at this point is this

this could be made up and it could just

be disinformation that's being used to

try to romote the Trump campaign right

now Rita here replies and says um the

way moderators conducted the debate was

a serious breach and death blow to ABC's

reputation okay so obviously you know

even since debate night I was commenting

on Wow and I was tweeting this too I was

tweeting hey why does it seem like Trump

has gotten fact check four or five times

here now In fairness some of the stuff

that Trump was getting fact checked on

he should have been fact checked on and

some of the things he should not have

been fact check on so some of the fact

checks were wrong and some of them were

accurate but kamla Harris when she made

a misstatement like for example uh

saying that Donald Trump suggested uh

anti semites were very fine people which

we know this because you should look up

the quote Trump said there's some people

in the crowd who are very fine and then

there are others who are very evil right

look up the quote yourself look at the

context there was no fact check of KLA

Harris okay we we called that out

immediately when it

happened so we've we all saw the same

debate we knew this was likely to be a

three And1 there's a reason why I

tweeted Trump should have prepared more

he knew this was going to be a three

vers one debate but didn't come as

prepared as he should have been that led

KLA Harris land many attacks you know I

also argue that Taylor Swift is so good

at branding we all know she hates Trump

by endorsing Harris after the debate

Swift implies she made her decision

during the debate and then I wrote yeah

right she was always for Harris but

brilliant branding move implying she was

waiting for the debate to make up her

mind and therefore you'd be smart to

make up your mind after the debate too I

love Taylor Swift but I called BS on

that one okay 57 minutes into debate

Trump has not talked about the future

ABC needed to stay neutral they have not

they fact check Trump uh and they stayed

on hard for Trump topics longer right

Harris is doing well not perfect but

respectable she she did very well uh and

uh wow ABC has fact checked Trump at

least three to four times now zero fact

checks by ABC for Harris again I I

didn't have too many fact checks I will

say for Harris either

but there were definitely a few

opportunities to fact check her and I

called him out anytime I saw him I'm

like I called him out I'm like no that's

wrong that's basic you saw me you saw me

cover this live uh there were more

opportunities to fact check Trump but

the fact that she got zero fact checks

uh and and he got five four to five uh

is helping lead to the speculation that

okay what kind of rigging was going on

here now the allegation apparently and

this is where we have to to really

question the source of this keep in mind

like I don't like this release I I think

this is this is kind of it's it

potentially is true but uh it's also

potentially total bull crap I hate how

they're setting this up so first of all

it's black insurrectionist I follow back

true Patriots is the account okay so so

so far the source is a little Looney

already uh and when you scroll through

their profile most of their tweets or

posts since it's now on X are basically

just all prot Trump uh here is how the

left honors 911 and you know implying

more terrorism comes from Trump uh first

it was dos attacks now the mail you know

basically everything about this person's

channel is doing whatever Trump wants

like it almost sounds like an ult for

Trump will you join me in calling phone

number 202225 27777 whatever this is the

number for speaker Johnson please tell

him to shut the government down unless

the save Act is passed we need every

single person who believes in Fair

elections to show them please join them

it's it's already illegal uh to vote an

election if you're not a documented

citizen obviously the save Act is

designed to strengthen some of the

prosecution here

but the account is certainly not an

unbiased Source right this is clearly a

trump uh uh a prot trump account it may

even be a trump campaign account

nonetheless they are now staking their

account reputation on the following I

will be releasing an affidavit from an

ABC whistleblower regarding the debate

okay now first of

all an affidavit doesn't necessarily

mean anything an affidavit doesn't I

mean what it is it's it's a sworn

statement but anybody can make a sworn

statement if you went to you know the

cameraman at ABC and you're like

hey 500 Grand to you or to your wife so

nobody sees or whatever I need you to

sign a sworn statement that you swear

you know something it's still not proof

right like proof would be here's an

email from ABC to the comma campaign I'm

just making an example of what proof

would be obviously there could be other

forms of proof recordings or whatever a

sworn affidavit is going to be on the

weaker end

of evidence actually a sworn affidavit

really isn't evidence at all uh as Judge

Judy could say or would likely say is he

a

say even though it's sworn it could be

complete

BS I have just signed a non-disclosure

agreement with the attorney of The

Whistleblower okay so if there's an

attorney of The Whistleblower is there

going to be a lawsuit because if there's

going to be a lawsuit then there'll be

evidence and then we can actually go

through

it the affidavit States how the Harris

campaign was given sample question okay

you can't even have grammar flow here

correctly which were essentially the

same questions that were given during

the debate and separate assurances of

factchecking Donald Trump and that she

would not be fact checked well it is

true that she was not fact checked and

it is true that Donald Trump was fact

check and we know ABC leans

left this is not evidence that ABC did

release questions nor is it evidence

that ABC gave assurances that there

would be factchecking of

trump accordingly the affidavit States

several other factors that were built

into the debate to give kamla a

significant Advantage I have seen and

read the affidavit and after the

attorney blacks out the name of the

Whistleblower and the other information

that could dox The Whistleblower I will

release the affidavit I I will be

releasing the affidavit before the

weekend is out okay so now if we have an

anonymous

affidavit and no evidence we really have

nothing this could be complete

fugazi it could literally be Donald

Trump that is the ABC whistleblower you

know I was there that night and it's

literally Donald Trump so I take this

with a substantial grain of

salt uh would now but I will say would

it surprise me that you know maybe

verbally the co the Harris campaign was

given a promise not to be fact checked

no it wouldn't surprise me uh and would

it surprise me that Harris Camp had some

of the questions beforehand no but then

again let's be real do we really think

that either campaign didn't know these

things would come up I mean think about

the flow of the campaign I mean I

certainly didn't have any answers

beforehand and I knew Trump was going to

get asked about abortion and I knew he

was going to f it

up that not a hard prediction to make

it's not a hard prediction at all in

fact to make it was actually pretty

freaking obvious that Trump was going to

get hit on abortion and he was going to

screw it up

the flow of the debate was intro intro

Trump tariffs after Trump tariffs and

some parts about the economy we get into

China and Taiwan and then straight into

abortion all of these are super

predictable topics we get into IVF we

get uh into Afghanistan we get

into uh liability for presidents via the

Supreme Court we get into j6

none of this was a surprise there was

not a single surprise topic here you

could have prepared for all of this

fracking oil climate change defund the

police come on I could have written

these questions you could have written

these questions none of these questions

were a surprise Trump could have been

substantially more

prepared and he chose not to be that's

on him I I think it may have been an ego

thing but honestly this debate is just

going to blow over and we're still going

to have a tight elction here now Donald

Trump apparently is now also coming out

suggesting that not only should there be

no tax on tips but there should also be

no tax on overtime pay now boy that

would be really interesting because

overtime pay is usually time and a half

to double time pay right you work more

than eight hours you usually get time

and a half you work more than 12 hours

in a shift you get double time double

pay dude if you didn't get paid tax like

if there was no tax on overtime pay that

would literally I mean think about this

for a moment let's say you make

uh 30 bucks an hour okay 30 bucks an

hour and on overtime you make $45 an

hour well divide that by your tax rate

so you know I don't know uh one minus

your tax rate call it

67% uh and we're going to divide it by

that saying you pay 33% of taxes that

means ordinarily you would have to make

about

$67 uh to be left with $45 after so in

other words if you were working time and

a half and that extra time was not taxed

it would be like working for $67 an hour

at time and a half so normally your wage

is $30 an hour time and a half not taxed

would be like $67 an hour

double time not taxed would actually be

like 3x pay and it make a lot of people

want to work overtime that's what D sure

so interesting can any of these

presidential plans from Harris or Trump

actually really pass well they' really

need to sweep and they need to have some

form of majority I think there's a

higher likelihood of Republicans

controlling the house and the Senate

just because of where the dynamic set

right now which seats are up for grabs

seats that Democrats might not hold on

to or Republicans might win uh but it's

it's a tossup right now in terms of

who's going to win the election so

you're probably going to have a

divided uh government and you're

probably going to be in a situation

where a lot of these big plans don't go

through anyway but we'll see certainly

not going to be like 2008 where you had

60 votes uh in the senate for Democrats

and you're able to to basically have a

filibuster proof majority and you can

slam dunk whatever you want like the

Affordable Care Act or otherwise you

know Obamacare we'll see either way I

saw this news wanted to cover it we got

a coupon code expiring in 2 hours thank

you so much for watching we'll see you

in the next one go to meet kevin.com to

learn more if you have questions or for

some reason you missed the coupon

whatever email us at staff atme

kevin.com thanks bye why not advertise

these things that you told us here I

feel like nobody else knows about this

we'll we'll try a little advertising and

see how it goes congratulations you have

done so much people love you people look

up to you Kevin PA there financial

analyst and YouTuber meet Kevin always

great to get your

take even though I'm a licensed

financial adviser licensed real estate

broker and becoming a stock broker this

video is not personalized advice for you

it is not tax legal or otherwise

personalized advice tailor to you this

video provides generalized perspective

information and commentary any

thirdparty content I show shall not be

deemed endorsed by me this video is not

and shall never be deemed reasonably

sufficient information for the purposes

of evaluating a security or investment

decision any link or promoted products

are either paid affiliations or products

or Services we may benefit from I also

personally operate an actively managed

ETF I may personally hold or otherwise

hold long or short positions in various

Securities potentially including those

mentioned in this video however I have

no relationship to any issuer other than

house Haack nor am I presently acting as

a market maker make sure if you're

considering investing in house Haack to

always read the PPM at house hack.com