TRANSCRIPTEnglish

"The Engine Fell Off" | UPS Cargo Plane CRASH VIDEO | N259UP

16m 39s2,589 words394 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

This is insane.

0:05

Oh [ __ ]

0:07

>> Holy smokes. Literally, this is the

0:11

crash footage from the ground of a

0:15

truck. You could see the truck driver

0:16

sitting here on his phone. This is

0:19

actual dash cam footage of this UPS

0:23

cargo aircraft with now four confirmed

0:27

deaths and 11 injuries being reported.

0:30

This is actual footage of the crash, not

0:34

artificial intelligence. I frankly I

0:36

wish it was, but these are real lives

0:39

that are being affected by this crash.

0:41

And in this video, we're going to talk

0:43

about new information that just came out

0:45

on this aircraft crash.

0:49

Oh [ __ ]

0:52

Oh my [ __ ] god.

1:07

>> This is absolutely heartbreaking, folks.

1:10

Today is November 4th and four people

1:12

are dead and uh 11 are injured. We just

1:16

had a catastrophic detachment of the

1:19

left engine with the remnants of it

1:21

found on the runway. This potentially

1:24

then led to a catastrophic not only loss

1:28

of thrust but likely system control,

1:30

maybe even a compressor stall of the

1:32

third engine at the tail, leaving the

1:35

aircraft potentially with only one

1:37

viable engine. Frankly, this was not a

1:41

survivable accident. This is a McDougall

1:44

Douglas MD11

1:46

tail number November 259iner uniform

1:49

Papa. It crashed shortly after takeoff

1:51

from Kilo Sierra Delta Foxtrot. That is

1:54

the Kentucky Louisville airport. And

1:56

folks, this is what the aircraft looks

1:58

like. It's operated by uh KM. It's been

2:01

used for transatlantic fights flights.

2:04

This is an aircraft that has a long

2:06

reputation. And this air specific model

2:10

that crashed today has been manufactured

2:12

relentlessly in the '90s. And the very

2:14

aircraft that crashed today was

2:16

manufactured in 1991,

2:19

which yes does make it 34 years old. And

2:23

that is raising some questions about

2:26

this aircraft potentially too old to

2:29

still be operating. What was the

2:30

maintenance history and the status of

2:32

this? Here it is. You can see it. the

2:34

Macdonald Douglas MD11 Foxtrot

2:37

manufacturer year 1991 with engines

2:41

certified April 28th 2007. Those

2:45

aircraft engines therefore certified

2:46

over 18 years ago raising questions

2:49

about the potential airworthiness

2:51

actually of them and the maintenance

2:53

history of those. But we know that this

2:55

aircraft ended up taking off from runway

2:58

17 right and it looks like they ended up

3:00

taking the entire available runway that

3:04

they could use from the taxiway alpha 8

3:07

for a full length departure. Now, it is

3:09

possible that they could have

3:11

backtracked on the runway and turned

3:13

around over here to pick up additional

3:15

runway length, but it does not seem

3:17

likely that that would have made any

3:19

difference given the complete and

3:21

catastrophic detachment of their left

3:26

engine, their number one engine. their

3:29

number one engine detaching

3:30

unfortunately which is pictured here is

3:33

unfortunately something that has

3:36

happened before with devastating

3:38

consequences. In fact, if we study what

3:42

happened with American Airlines of

3:43

flight 191, we could find that this DC10

3:47

ended up killing 271

3:50

passengers as it crashed on May 25th,

3:53

1979,

3:55

plus killing two people on the ground.

3:57

Now, I want to be clear with that 271

3:59

passenger number that does include the

4:01

crew in fairness to the crew and the

4:03

pilots and the passengers. That was a

4:05

devastating aircraft incident where

4:07

engine one also detached due to a

4:10

maintenance failure. A loss of power in

4:13

the cockpit led to the cutting off of

4:15

the cockpit voice recorder and the

4:17

engine separating on the runway. The

4:20

problem with an engine separating like

4:22

this though is that it's not just that

4:25

you end up losing an engine. It's what

4:27

all of the other impacts or side effects

4:31

are that happen after you have an engine

4:34

that just tears off of the wing. First

4:36

of all, here's another image of the

4:39

engine cowling. So, it looks like almost

4:41

the engine cowling. So, the front or the

4:44

cover of the aircraft uh of the engine

4:47

component ripped off separately from the

4:50

actual turbine of the aircraft. So you

4:53

had sort of a multi-stage

4:55

tearing off of this engine, a complete

4:59

catastrophic failure of this aircraft.

5:02

And the problem isn't just losing that

5:05

engine. This is more than just losing

5:06

thrust on an engine. It's that you now

5:09

have a hole where that wing is. You've

5:12

potentially now severed hydraulic lines,

5:15

which unfortunately ruined the

5:18

functionality potentially of your

5:20

rudder, which is already challenged

5:22

enough when you lose one engine in a

5:25

three engine hightail configuration.

5:28

But you also potentially risk stabbing

5:31

the fuel tanks or somehow igniting the

5:33

fuel tanks, leading to exactly the

5:36

incident that we saw of the aircraft

5:38

moving down the runway on fire. This was

5:41

a complete and catastrophic failure and

5:44

I don't think that there was anything

5:46

that the pilots could have done to avoid

5:48

the fatal crash that we saw. Now, keep

5:52

this in mind. If you look really

5:54

closely, which is hard to do right here,

5:56

you could actually see what looks like a

5:59

potential compressor stall in the

6:02

engines or sorry, in the one engine

6:05

that's left. Now, it's very hard to tell

6:08

because obviously we end up getting to

6:09

the end of the video and the aircraft

6:11

cartwheels uh into the u uh the the

6:15

facility at the end of the runway. But

6:17

it's unclear if what we see here, these

6:20

flashes right there are compressor

6:22

stalls on the number three engine, which

6:25

is the one on the tail section, or if

6:27

there's something else. But that flash

6:29

right there suggests a potential

6:31

starvation of air flow to that center

6:34

engine in the back. Now, this is a

6:37

different kind of aircraft than what I'm

6:39

licensed to fly. It is a threeine

6:42

aircraft. If this engine rips off,

6:45

remember, not only do you now have

6:47

massive yaw forces to the left as you're

6:50

now no longer asymmetrically balanced,

6:53

but you're pushing from the right. So,

6:55

you're really yawing that plane to the

6:57

left. you potentially have a hole in

6:58

that wing. So now you're losing lift on

7:00

that left wing. You're hoping your final

7:03

two engines can keep you afloat. But

7:05

what happens? That third engine ends up

7:09

ingesting all of the fumes in the

7:12

exhaust, which doesn't provide rich

7:14

enough air flow, rich enough oxygen at a

7:18

cool enough temperature to actually

7:20

provide flight performance for this jet

7:22

engine. And what do you get? a stall or

7:25

a disruption of air flow in the engine,

7:29

which then makes you lose thrust on not

7:31

just the engine that's gone, physically

7:34

gone, but now on your second engine,

7:37

which means you now have an aircraft

7:39

that is potentially and likely fully

7:41

loaded going from Kentucky to Hawaii

7:44

over five 4,600 mile distance plus 15%

7:50

reserve at least, maybe even more since

7:52

you'll be flying over the ocean without

7:54

a very convenient place to land if you

7:55

needed to. So, you're likely max takeoff

7:58

weight on cargo, likely max takeoff on

8:02

uh fuel, and you only have one likely

8:06

functional engine. Now, I know that

8:08

seems confusing. Why would you need cold

8:10

or cooler air? Well, air uh when we get

8:14

to actually compressing air and

8:16

combusting it, aircraft perform any kind

8:18

of aircraft engine which whether it's a

8:20

propeller aircraft uh or a jet engine

8:22

will perform better with cooler air on

8:25

the outside. And the cooler the air is,

8:27

the more thrust we can create, the more

8:29

powerful our engines are. We take off in

8:31

a hot summer day in Vegas, for example,

8:33

and it's 110° outside, we need even more

8:36

runway length just to be able to take

8:38

off. Now, aircraft are certified to fly

8:41

with one engine in operative. But when

8:44

you have two engines in operative, like

8:46

what we likely see here, there's almost

8:49

nothing you can do anymore. But it's not

8:51

just that you have two engines in

8:53

operative. It's that one likely ignited

8:56

your fuel tanks on the left and left a

8:58

hole in your aircraft, which means your

9:01

controllability, as much as you would

9:04

like to follow procedures here, would be

9:07

futile. And so it's no surprise that the

9:10

aircraft loses lift entirely and then

9:13

cartwheels as we saw in the image at the

9:16

beginning of the video, which is

9:18

absolutely devastating because these

9:20

pilots were doomed from the moment they

9:24

hit their decision speed V1 and they

9:28

were already on fire or after V1 they

9:32

lost their engine. We don't know exactly

9:34

when that engine was lost, but we saw

9:37

images of that engine on the ground

9:40

along with the cowling. Now, at this

9:42

point, it's too early to tell if this is

9:46

uh the uh you know, the engine, you

9:49

know? I mean, it's it's obviously more

9:51

than just the cowling, right? The

9:52

cowling is just sort of like the trim

9:54

piece, right? So, it's obviously like

9:56

the cowling plus the cooling compartment

9:59

in it. It's it's almost like the front

10:01

third of the engine, the whole sort of

10:03

like inlet section just ripped off and

10:06

then you had the actual turbine

10:08

component fall off separately. Again,

10:12

that's going to leave a terrible

10:14

situation for you to actually be able to

10:16

control the aircraft. Almost impossible.

10:19

And it's really well depicted and I

10:21

encourage you to watch this in this

10:22

YouTube video right here. It's the day

10:25

the sky fell. The tragic story of

10:27

American Airlines flight 191. We can

10:30

watch a very just brief moment here to

10:32

give you a sample.

10:35

>> He's not talking to me.

10:37

>> Losing power.

10:38

>> Of course, they're not talking because

10:39

we aviate first.

10:41

>> Bank.

10:42

>> Passengers have a frightening view of

10:44

the ground below.

10:48

>> What's going on?

10:50

The pilots can't get the altitude they

10:52

need, and they're banking further and

10:54

further to the left.

10:56

>> Go right. Go right. Come on. Come on.

11:00

>> There's literally nothing these pilots

11:03

likely could have done. Now, in this

11:05

DC10 crash, we end up finding out that

11:08

the root problem was a maintenance

11:11

failure. Now, the maintenance failure

11:12

here was very interesting because it

11:15

goes back to a history of American

11:16

Airlines actually wanting to save labor

11:20

and reducing the amount of time it takes

11:22

to disassemble the engines. And rather

11:24

than disassembling all of the engine

11:26

components individually, they'd actually

11:28

hold the engines on a forklift. But

11:30

forklift operators wouldn't be able to

11:33

visually see where the engine and where

11:36

the structural components of the plane

11:37

were and they were only guided by voice

11:41

or hand signals or both. Uh and

11:44

unfortunately in such a case damage

11:47

could occur to the actual mounting

11:49

brackets of the engines and that damage

11:53

which in the case of the DCT10 1979

11:56

crash that American Airlines flight 191

11:59

in that case we ended up finding an NTSB

12:02

conclusion that the aircraft had

12:05

structural damage that got worse every

12:08

single takeoff and landing until it

12:11

finally failed in the catastrophy. roic

12:13

manner that it did. Is it possible

12:15

that's exactly what happened here?

12:17

Absolutely. Especially since this

12:20

aircraft has a flight history of

12:21

multiple different uh flights over the

12:25

last month. There are some rumors and

12:27

keep in mind all of the information here

12:29

is still to be verified. We we are not

12:31

on the ground there, so we can't verify

12:33

everything. But we can do is try to

12:35

piece together parts of the puzzle. And

12:36

we can see this aircraft was actually

12:38

quite active at flying. We just had a

12:40

1-hour flight from Baltimore. Before

12:42

that, we had another one-hour flight.

12:44

Before that, we had a flight from

12:45

Ontario. Then we had Oakland uh

12:47

international. Uh then back to SDF,

12:50

Louisville, Kentucky here, Miami, Tampa,

12:53

Portland, Ontario, continuously coming

12:55

back to SDF almost as if this was home

12:58

base here. Uh and so this had a very

13:01

rich history of flying. So, it seems

13:04

likely, although of course we won't know

13:06

until the uh NTSB really gets to the

13:08

bottom of this and we get more data or

13:10

cockpit voice recorder and otherwise, it

13:12

seems likely that there was some kind of

13:15

failure that just grew over time that

13:18

maybe looked okay on pilot walkound or

13:22

on visual inspection, but was just some

13:24

form of maintenance failure that grew

13:27

over time. or maybe not even a

13:29

maintenance failure. It could

13:30

theoretically also have just been a part

13:32

failure over time, which of course some

13:35

will argue that is indeed synonymous

13:37

with a maintenance failure. Who knows?

13:39

This is an older aircraft and

13:40

unfortunately

13:42

this is a devastating outcome. This is a

13:45

devastating outcome where there was

13:47

really nothing these pilots could have

13:49

done to save this aircraft. And it is

13:51

devastating to see the cartwheel here.

13:54

But this cartwheel is actually exactly

13:56

what you would anticipate happening

13:58

because you just can't control this

14:01

aircraft when you have a hole in your

14:03

wing on the side. And it's likely that

14:05

wing scraped the ground, broke off here

14:08

leading to the initial explosion. And

14:10

then of course the absolute terror and

14:13

horror of an aircraft crashing right in

14:17

front of you. You could see it in the

14:19

individual's reaction here. Uh and then

14:21

of course the subsequent explosion of

14:24

jet fuel and you could see the different

14:26

way that jet fuel is burning at very

14:29

high temperature. Look at those the the

14:31

these different colors of of burn that

14:34

we're getting here. Uh very very spooky

14:38

uh and and bizarre and and certainly

14:40

highly emotionally uh charged here. Very

14:42

devastating. The questions now are of

14:46

course going to come down to what were

14:47

the maintenance logs? There are some

14:49

suggestions that the aircraft

14:51

potentially went through an extended

14:52

period of maintenance between September

14:54

3rd to October 18th. Why was the

14:57

aircraft out of service for what appears

15:00

to be around 6 weeks? Did it just come

15:03

out of service and did it then go back

15:06

to work for the last about 2 weeks

15:08

leading to additional stresses and

15:10

stresses and stresses uh that could have

15:13

led to those fatigue cracks? Who knows?

15:16

But it's unfortunate because this is

15:17

eerily similar to the disaster of that

15:20

same style of incident that we saw in

15:24

flight 191 where you also had uh on the

15:29

runway uh engine components uh

15:31

indicating that you had this

15:33

catastrophic failure at takeoff. Take a

15:36

look at this. Here's one of the images

15:37

showing you components screwed across

15:41

the runway here. And it certainly

15:42

doesn't help that some suggest there was

15:44

a recycling plant potentially with even

15:46

more petroleum tanks

15:49

in the crash distance of the actual

15:53

damage. Now, it's unclear if that had

15:54

anything to do with it. Uh there are

15:56

some folks posting that this was near

15:58

the area but not necessarily near the

16:00

actual crash site. Who knows? We've seen

16:02

a lot of different footage here and

16:05

we're just going to have to wait and see

16:06

to get more information on exactly what

16:08

happened. But this is terrible. And now

16:11

we have a little bit more information

16:13

and I'm sure even more will come out

16:14

[music] in time. But in my opinion,

16:16

there was nothing anybody could have

16:18

done here once that plane was on fire.

16:21

>> Why not advertise these things that you

16:23

told us here? I feel like nobody else

16:24

knows about this.

16:25

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

16:27

see how it goes.

16:27

>> Congratulations, [music] man. You have

16:29

done so much. People love you. People

16:30

look up to you.

16:31

>> Kevin Pra there, financial analyst and

16:33

YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great to

16:35

get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.