TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Trump ATTACKED, Housing CRASHING, Fed & Oil Hell, & Apple iPhone 15 FAIL | Bottom Line Report [E.4]

49m 1s8,332 words1,227 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

is the real estate crash here is

0:02

inflation coming back what is Apple's

0:04

disaster what's going on with matterport

0:07

stock is a Donald Trump going to debate

0:11

the next Republican debate coming up

0:13

soon and what about reaction to the FED

0:16

are rates ever going to come back down

0:19

let's talk about all this and More in

0:21

today's bottom line report today's

0:23

report is brought to you by the brand

0:26

new Noob verse Pro crash courses on

0:30

specific subjects you all have been

0:32

asking for go to meet kevin.com to learn

0:34

more about these specific crash courses

0:37

releasing soon as they release the

0:39

pricing will be higher so check them out

0:41

as some of them are starting for just 79

0:44

now as crash courses check those out

0:46

again at me kevin.com America's biggest

0:49

landlord apparently is now struggling to

0:53

find properties to buy this is a pretty

0:56

big surprise for a lot of folks and it

0:59

might be an indication of what's to come

1:02

because some of these big landlords are

1:05

actually starting to dump and what that

1:08

could mean for us in terms of a real

1:10

estate reset well let's just say it

1:13

could get juicy let's take a look at

1:15

this piece from The Wall Street Journal

1:17

which goes deep on America's biggest

1:19

landlord Invitation Homes and American

1:22

homes for rent are some of the largest

1:25

landlords in America and they are

1:27

lamenting that they are having trouble

1:29

finding homes to buy they say quote we

1:31

write hundreds of offers every week at

1:34

price points that we'd be willing to

1:35

transact at Invitation Homes a chief

1:38

executive Dallas Tanner told investors

1:41

this summer but we're striking out quite

1:43

a bit landlords with a thousand

1:45

Properties or more accounted for point

1:48

four percent of Home purchases during

1:50

the second quarter that's down from 2.4

1:53

percent in 2021 in other words these

1:55

Mega landlords are buying less of the

1:59

homes that are actually transacting and

2:01

part of that could be because prices are

2:03

so high but it's not just that prices

2:06

are high right now it's also that some

2:09

of these companies are starting to

2:11

actually dump real estate and this

2:15

creates something really interesting for

2:17

about a year and a half I've been

2:18

warning that the real estate market is

2:21

going to face pain when we start seeing

2:25

institutions dump real estate because

2:28

it's not going to be mom and pop 30-year

2:31

fixed rate mortgage owners who are

2:33

dumping their real estate with this

2:34

locked in a sub three percent rate it's

2:38

institutions who have to free up their

2:41

Capital because it doesn't make sense to

2:43

own real estate at a four percent cap

2:45

rate when you could get a money market

2:46

fund paying you five and a half percent

2:48

these companies aren't billed to try to

2:51

make money during these times they're

2:52

built to make money during the easy

2:54

times they're not billed for the hard

2:56

times where buying wedge deals is what

2:58

creates profit for them it's not what

3:00

these companies are built for unlike my

3:02

real estate startup which of course you

3:04

could read the prospectus on and learn

3:05

more about at healthsack.com since we're

3:07

not fundraising but Invitation Homes

3:09

owns about 83 000 homes and listen to

3:12

this they've been actively selling homes

3:15

that have appreciated at the point where

3:17

the properties are now yielding less

3:20

than four percent and instead what

3:22

they're doing is they're selling these

3:24

properties and they're throwing the cash

3:26

in the bank they've also started buying

3:30

properties from other institutions at a

3:33

discount off of what those companies

3:35

bought the homes for in 2021 and

3:37

Invitation Homes just bought 1870 homes

3:41

from Starwood real estate trust a

3:43

company that's now upside down on those

3:45

homes they've speculated on during the

3:48

bubble in 2021 and Invitation Homes is

3:51

trying to pick him up cheaper but I'll

3:52

tell you if it weren't for those 1870

3:56

homes Invitation Homes would have

3:58

actually sold more homes than they ended

4:01

up buying that's because they added just

4:05

470 houses in 2023 so far and they sold

4:09

675. that means they would have been net

4:12

sellers had it not been for that

4:14

Starwood acquisition American homes for

4:17

rent is also becoming a net seller look

4:21

at this they were a net seller during

4:23

the first half of 2023 selling nearly

4:26

1100 homes while adding just about 780.

4:30

most of them newly built homes many of

4:34

those that they're building themselves

4:36

in markets where they can still so get

4:38

higher cap rates now some of these

4:40

markets are seen as risk here which is

4:43

why they often go for newer Built Homes

4:45

so they can minimize their risk areas

4:48

like Pittsburgh Cleveland Cincinnati New

4:50

Orleans Chicago Detroit they're still

4:52

sitting around these six to seven caps

4:54

because you're usually trading with

4:56

higher poverty and you're taking on more

4:59

eviction risk in other words you're

5:02

going for a riskier potentially low or

5:04

Quality Property trying to offset that

5:07

with newer construction to squeeze out

5:09

some yield but you're really sacrificing

5:12

quality Properties by doing that

5:14

potentially some argue what's

5:16

fascinating though is the takeaway from

5:19

all of this is that when institutions

5:21

are starting to sell you might be

5:24

getting closer to the point where blood

5:26

is starting to flow in the streets and I

5:29

believe that's where some of the

5:30

juiciest real estate deals can be bought

5:32

potentially this winter will see exactly

5:35

that more institutions becoming net

5:38

sellers especially as things get tougher

5:41

in the winter time usually the only

5:42

people who have to sell in November

5:44

December are not the choice movers who

5:46

are you know trying to upgrade their

5:48

home or move closer to their childhood

5:49

schools is people who have to sell

5:52

because they're getting squeezed out as

5:54

in an institution is getting squeezed

5:56

out an Airbnb Speculator is getting

5:59

squeezed out somebody who's speculated

6:01

thinking they'd be quickly able to

6:02

refinance as rates come down they get

6:05

squeezed out these are people who are

6:07

going to have to sell they won't be able

6:09

to make the payments anymore and they

6:11

create a great opportunity for you to go

6:13

by or for us to buy over at house hack

6:16

anyway pay attention to the real estate

6:18

market because there's definitely some

6:20

pain coming to the real estate market

6:22

next what's going on with inflation well

6:27

thenx just reported that package prices

6:29

were actually down about two percent in

6:32

the last quarter and they picked up

6:35

about 400 000 packages versus a worth of

6:38

volume from the yellow bankruptcy and

6:41

the UPS strike drama FedEx also says

6:44

thanks to a reduction in costs their

6:47

profit beat and their profit

6:49

expectations going forward are expected

6:51

to continue to beat this is something

6:53

that's very exciting for FedEx because

6:55

they're really telling the world hey

6:57

look prices are going down for packages

6:59

but we're able to produce more profit

7:01

because we're running the ship stronger

7:03

and more uh efficiently this is leading

7:06

FedEx stock to move about six percent in

7:09

pre-market to the upside which is quite

7:11

exciting but take a look at what's going

7:13

on with the inflationary Trends in

7:16

something that's been pretty

7:17

inflationary

7:18

Pet Foods yeah head Foods Pet Foods now

7:23

facing potentially lower prices look at

7:27

this pet owners resort to cheaper food

7:29

as inflation weighs on wallets

7:32

pet food is typically one of the last

7:34

places that people go to save money and

7:38

guess what folks it's finally happening

7:40

first it starts with discretionary

7:42

purchases for pets like buying less toys

7:46

which are usually high margin pet items

7:49

then even though pet food is up 11 from

7:52

a year ago we're finally starting to see

7:56

premium dry dog food losing share at an

8:00

accelerating rate down 2.9 percentage

8:03

points in just the last three months

8:05

ended July compared to a year ago you're

8:08

starting to see dis and deflation this

8:12

is good this is one of the last holdouts

8:14

to kind of get prices down for goods or

8:17

at least the rate of inflation down

8:19

that's what we need we need to see this

8:21

spread throughout every level I remember

8:23

last year a course member actually sent

8:25

me a message and said hey I run a pet

8:27

supply store in Vegas and we're still

8:30

seeing price increases and thought okay

8:32

when that turns it'll be a sign that

8:35

we're starting to get towards the end of

8:38

the cycle and here's a Wall Street

8:40

Journal piece telling us that at

8:42

inflation is actually here or that

8:44

deflation disinflation rather right that

8:46

that disinflation is finally turning and

8:48

some of those leftover categories now

8:50

obviously we still have work to do we

8:52

have a fed that's convinced we need to

8:53

be higher potentially forever and that's

8:56

leading to some nervousness in markets

8:58

in fact quite literally there is an

9:01

article now in the Wall Street Journal

9:02

talking about higher interest rates not

9:05

for longer but potentially forever yes

9:08

that's literally the article title here

9:11

and that's because now you have a fad

9:13

that potentially is signaling Hey look

9:17

we don't really know what's going on

9:19

we're creating these projections based

9:22

on what people think uh which are 20

9:25

Bank presidents and voting members

9:27

combined they throw their little

9:29

estimates and Dot plots down whatever

9:31

but they're not even all voting members

9:33

so this whole Dot Plot and SCP

9:35

projections thing it's all fine and

9:38

dandy but what really matters is what's

9:40

actually happening in the economy and

9:42

when Jay Powell yesterday was asked well

9:44

what's actually happening then like what

9:46

are we going to do he basically told us

9:47

I don't really know soft landing's the

9:50

goal but it's not the base case so we'll

9:53

just play it by ear and three months of

9:55

disinflating data doesn't make a trend

9:57

so we'll just take it one step at a time

10:00

and so obviously that led the treasury

10:02

market to sell off once again which the

10:05

treasury Market's already been facing a

10:07

supply issue right you've got the

10:08

government borrowing so much money what

10:11

do they do they then have more treasury

10:13

bonds available you not only have the

10:15

government offering more treasury bonds

10:17

available debt rising over 33 trillion

10:20

dollars now we added a trillion dollars

10:22

of debt in just 30 in the last 30 days

10:24

it's remarkable but beyond that you've

10:27

got the Federal Reserve dumping treasury

10:29

bonds via quantitative tightening it's

10:31

the opposite of QE right and you've got

10:34

low appetite for bonds because every

10:36

time somebody buys bonds yields just end

10:38

up going up even higher and as yields go

10:40

up even higher your bond values lose

10:43

principal value it's too risky to be in

10:45

bonds so just go buy money markets at

10:48

five five and a half percent it's crazy

10:50

10-year treasury right now

10:53

4.43 that's insane it is the highest

10:57

we've seen in this entire cycle and

11:00

guess what that ends up doing

11:01

drives mortgage rates over eight percent

11:04

yeah you have a 740 credit score today

11:07

they will be over eight percent

11:11

scary so what about the idea about

11:13

higher interest rates not just for

11:15

longer but maybe forever here it is on

11:18

Wednesday fed officials surprise the

11:19

markets by signaling interest rates

11:20

won't fall as much as previously planned

11:22

consider that they're only expecting

11:25

rates to fall and this is kind of the

11:27

scary thing right they're only expecting

11:29

rates to fall to 5.1 percent by the end

11:33

of next year that is by the end of 2024.

11:38

they're only expecting rates to go down

11:39

to 5.1 percent that's like nothing

11:42

that's basically like not even cutting

11:44

at all I mean the market expects rates

11:46

to go down to 4.7 percent but basically

11:48

no Cuts then a year after that the end

11:51

of 2025 maybe we get down to 3.9 and

11:55

then maybe by 2026 we get down to 2.9 in

12:01

other words you literally are cutting at

12:04

a rate of only 0.08 per month over the

12:09

next 28

12:11

months think about that for a moment I

12:13

think we literally

12:15

Overlook how blatantly slow the current

12:20

projections are the current projections

12:22

are that over the next 28 months we will

12:25

cut rates

12:26

by about

12:28

2.5 2 to 2.4 percent

12:32

works out to roughly

12:34

0.08 percent of cuts per month in other

12:37

words to get one full percentage point

12:40

one full percentage point a hundred

12:43

basis points divided by eight basis

12:46

points of cuts is over a year to get

12:50

down one percent and this is exactly why

12:52

now you've got stories like this here in

12:55

the Wall Street Journal suggesting uh oh

12:57

maybe rates are going to stay high for a

13:00

very long period of time to some extent

13:02

people believe that maybe this is just

13:04

talk that is maybe the FED is just

13:07

trying to talk inflation into the grave

13:11

for sure after all j-pal finally rolled

13:14

and said it people hate inflation and we

13:17

need to make sure that inflation goes

13:19

away forever and so by doing that we

13:23

just keep talking that rates are going

13:25

to stay high until we're convinced

13:27

inflation is gone and then we can always

13:29

rapidly cut and so that's the premise

13:31

behind this idea that maybe the neutral

13:34

rate is higher and we need to force

13:36

rates down uh or of course inflation

13:38

down by having a higher rate path for

13:41

much longer this is problematic though

13:43

because a lot of people are like wait

13:45

does that mean the stock market is going

13:47

to suffer I mean think about it if rates

13:50

are going to stay high this long and

13:52

rates are only going to fall at a slow

13:55

pace then is there potentially a risk to

13:59

the stock market in such a slow move

14:02

down with rates well TS lawn board

14:05

actually thinks

14:07

no not necessarily in fact listen to

14:10

what TS longboard and they're usually

14:11

the Bears okay generally the Bears

14:13

listen to what TS Lombard thinks is

14:15

actually the best for risk assets like

14:18

stocks look at this here's a piece from

14:21

TS Lombard out right after the FED

14:23

meeting so it incorporates news from the

14:25

FED meeting and I want to jump right to

14:27

an important segment right here look at

14:30

this

14:31

we are not yet in danger of undoing 12

14:35

months of disinflationary progress

14:37

despite what's going on with oil right

14:40

okay good that's great but what about

14:42

this here A recession with deep Cuts

14:45

would end up leading risk assets to

14:50

struggle so they're arguing that if we

14:53

end up getting a recession where the FED

14:55

has to panic cut that's what you're

14:57

going to see pain and risk assets

14:59

because that's when you're likely going

15:01

to see bankruptcies that's when you're

15:03

going to see earnings crash that's when

15:05

you're going to see layoffs that's when

15:07

you're going to see real pain even

15:09

though we might want those big cuts

15:11

because it means yay cheap money again

15:13

it would come on the back of a lot of

15:15

earnings pain and it's actually not what

15:18

you want so be careful what you wish for

15:20

the idea of we want big cuts maybe the

15:24

opposite of what we actually want as

15:25

investors

15:27

TS Lombard they're the Bears folks and

15:30

what do they argue they say the

15:31

following gradual Cuts intended to

15:35

normalize would support risk assets

15:40

in the near term

15:42

as well as an fx cover rally this is

15:46

more for the year foreign exchange uh

15:48

Traders but point of this TS lumbar

15:51

piece here what's so fascinating is that

15:53

this idea that

15:55

maybe just maybe the reason the Nike

15:58

Swoosh is playing out the reason even

16:01

the bear Morgan Stanley Mike Wilson

16:03

Morgan saying is Mike Wilson says wow

16:05

Mega caps might do great is because Mega

16:08

caps give you less of an opportunity

16:12

cost right if you're sitting in Money

16:14

Market funds you potentially miss out on

16:16

markets going up right so Mega caps and

16:19

the big growth stocks and the big tech

16:20

stocks and the NASDAQ stocks whatever

16:22

they give you less opportunity cost risk

16:25

because you're exposed to the market so

16:28

in theory you don't have an opportunity

16:29

cost risk okay so they give you less of

16:32

that but what else do they give you well

16:34

in the event that you go into a

16:36

recession

16:37

and risk assets get hurt

16:39

the biggest companies will be most

16:42

likely to survive

16:44

but if you don't go into a recession

16:46

they're also most likely to succeed

16:51

in this winner take all environment that

16:54

we're in they have the lowest borrowing

16:56

costs they're borrowing like Microsoft

16:58

around three percent while they're

17:00

reinvesting their cash at five to five

17:02

and a half percent it's insane

17:05

at the same time they're the ones

17:07

probably most primed to benefit from the

17:10

artificial intelligence Revolution

17:11

because they have the money to spend on

17:13

capex to capitalize on the actual

17:17

efficiencies of artificial intelligence

17:19

versus every American Consumer who's

17:21

like uh open AI whatever man I'm just

17:23

trying to pay the gas bills it's crazy

17:25

it's a crazy environment that we're in

17:27

that the Bears are literally now coming

17:30

out and saying yeah you know

17:33

maybe this like slow cutting phase is

17:36

actually exactly what you want for risk

17:38

assets because it just aligns with the

17:41

Nike Swoosh recovery that Kevin's been

17:43

taught they may as well just say me

17:44

Kevin's been talking about this forever

17:46

Nike Swoosh recovery yes he's also been

17:49

saying it's gonna be volatile a volatile

17:51

Nike solution ever promised it was all

17:53

just gonna go straight up although

17:54

honestly if you look at the week if you

17:57

just look at the NASDAQ on the basis of

17:59

a weak chart

18:01

it feels almost like it's just gone

18:04

straight up so a little volatility is

18:06

maybe the price to pay for some of the

18:08

gloriousness that's been occurring but

18:10

anyway take a look at this break evens

18:13

we know that break evens have risen I've

18:16

been complaining about break evens

18:17

Rising The Five-Year break even up the

18:19

five-year forward break even up they did

18:21

fall after Jay Pal's Hawking but what do

18:25

we know about the five-year Break Even

18:26

well one big thing that we know is that

18:29

at least according to T.S Lombard they

18:32

have not risen as aggressively as you

18:34

would think based on the rise in Energy

18:38

prices specifically oil this is a fancy

18:41

way of saying hey look ordinarily when

18:44

you have oil prices spiking the way they

18:47

have about 30 percent over the last

18:48

quarter

18:49

and hedge funds going all in on freaking

18:52

oil right now ordinarily you would see a

18:55

much larger move towards

18:59

well breakeven's going up you would see

19:01

fear you would almost see uncertainty

19:04

priced into these break evens but you're

19:07

not seeing that not only are you not

19:09

seeing that but you're seeing Jay pow

19:10

who's looking at the break evens going

19:12

up and he literally said that I quote

19:16

even financial markets are just

19:20

inflation expectations remain well

19:23

anchored

19:25

that's powerful very very powerful it's

19:28

almost as powerful as being able to say

19:30

that you can get access to a crash

19:32

course on a very specific topic like

19:35

sales or buying your first home or

19:38

renovating or stocks for as little as 79

19:41

bucks fundamental analysis really really

19:44

good those don't include live stream

19:46

access but you can bundle in live stream

19:47

access but they give you really good

19:50

crash course material it'll all be brand

19:53

spanking new material so if you want to

19:55

bundle up with the profit portal which

19:57

is all of our existing courses or you

19:59

have questions send us an email at staff

20:00

at mekevin.com

20:03

remember how I was saying that hedge

20:05

funds are going all in on oil right now

20:08

it's the trade it's kind of like when

20:10

shorting Tesla was the trade

20:13

we want to know what's kind of crazy

20:14

though look at hedge fund allocation on

20:18

oil you ready for this

20:20

should not come as a surprise to you

20:22

hedge funds are plowing into oil they

20:27

are going oil baby

20:29

and everybody's estimating that that's

20:31

it oil's gonna go to the Moon why is oil

20:34

gonna go to the Moon because the edges

20:36

are in it of course they're publishing

20:38

bold pieces on oil going to 120 so they

20:41

can squeeze their profits out of oil

20:44

be wary of what the hedgies and suits

20:47

are telling you always be aware of what

20:50

people's positioning is

20:52

you should know my positioning I Grant

20:55

and actively managed ETF it's a

20:57

transparent ETF for goodness sakes

20:59

for goodness sakes it literally every

21:02

single day tells you what the possession

21:04

I guess

21:06

I'm blunt about that okay I I realize

21:09

everyone's got biases but that's okay

21:11

that's what makes us different

21:14

but the Nike Swoosh has proven correct

21:16

so far and I think it's going to keep

21:18

coming I also think that real estate

21:20

pain is coming you'll want to buckle up

21:22

for that real estate pain don't worry so

21:25

much about this oil trade there's oil

21:27

trade at the same time as you've got

21:29

floundering China and a floundering

21:32

Europe we really think that this oil

21:35

trade is going to hold probably not in

21:38

fact even this piece right here suggests

21:40

it's not economically driven this is

21:42

driven by supply chain restraints by

21:43

OPEC plus and trading in other words

21:47

when you get OPEC plus and Russia saying

21:49

hey we're all going to cut and then all

21:51

of a sudden all the hedges plowing going

21:53

oh well they're going to cut and then

21:55

they'll all write institutional pieces

21:57

about oh oil is going to 100. they

22:00

traded in that direction and when they

22:02

dump it it gets rapidly dumped it

22:04

happens time and time again this is why

22:06

Jay Powell on our bingo card said

22:09

literally we are going to look through

22:11

energy price volatility

22:13

because this is the crap that happens

22:15

all the time he said it's a very bad

22:17

tool for predicting future inflation yes

22:19

is it going to affect headline inflation

22:21

who cares it's going to temporarily

22:23

affect headline inflation nobody said if

22:25

I show is going to go down in a straight

22:26

line

22:28

not a big deal though look at Kroger

22:31

look at FedEx look at the pet stores

22:34

look closely at inflation data it is

22:37

gone it's gone leftovers of it are going

22:40

away

22:41

the leftover inflation even Peter Schiff

22:46

is like yeah inflation's gone and I

22:49

respect Peter Schiff

22:51

respectable answer inflation is gone but

22:54

who really won here well not the

22:56

American you're still stuck with higher

22:58

prices that's the argument Peter Schiff

23:00

makes and he's not wrong he's right the

23:03

inflation is still here but the actual

23:05

continuous increase is gone now we've

23:08

got to talk apple and some more

23:10

matterport and stock analysis but first

23:13

a quick tangent on Donald Trump

23:16

The Wall Street Journal editorial board

23:19

went as far as suggesting that Donald

23:22

Trump is afraid to debate that he is

23:26

ducking exchanges with his competitors

23:28

who could challenge his record Donald

23:31

Trump is expected to skip the next

23:34

debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential

23:36

Library here in Simi Valley California

23:40

which is about 30 minutes away from

23:41

where I live

23:42

the debate will be held on the 27th at 9

23:45

00 PM Eastern 6 p.m Pacific time I'll be

23:48

covering it live just like I did in the

23:50

last time but I want you to know

23:52

something about the Wall Street Journal

23:53

the Wall Street journal's editorial

23:56

board

23:57

is basically paid for by Rupert Murdoch

24:01

Murdoch controls News Corp which owns

24:04

The Wall Street Journal guess what

24:06

Murdoch also controls the fox

24:08

corporation who's running the debate

24:10

Trump isn't going to

24:12

and Donald Trump will be instead

24:15

conducting a rally two union members

24:18

to once again get media attention while

24:21

the fox debates go on it's brilliant

24:24

last time was Tucker Carlson this time

24:25

it'll be union members during the union

24:27

strikes of course you can blame Biden

24:30

he's gonna blame electric vehicles

24:31

though I think Donald Trump is my

24:34

opinion I like to be transparent okay

24:35

y'all have asked for more of my opinion

24:37

I'm going to tell you when I give you my

24:39

opinion and I'm going to be as unbiased

24:41

as possible after that I'll give you my

24:44

opinion Donald Trump is really going to

24:46

stop bagging on electric vehicles

24:48

they're a lot better A lot better range

24:50

they're not as big of a headache as they

24:52

used to be

24:53

and he has started softening he started

24:56

to say hey just let people have a choice

24:57

you want a gas car you want electric car

24:59

that's fine but I think he's making a

25:01

losing argument slamming on this idea

25:03

that electric cars are so bad and that

25:05

you know Biden's only pushing EVS it's

25:07

true they're pushing EVS

25:09

but I don't know that it's a winning

25:10

argument to say that's so bad but anyway

25:12

that's just my piece you can you

25:13

chastise me for that let's take a look

25:16

at the rest of this piece here so the

25:18

Wall Street Journal editorial board is

25:19

arguing that Donald Trump should make

25:22

his stance clear on abortion Donald

25:24

Trump I actually talked about this a

25:26

couple days ago I thought had this

25:29

very

25:30

well put together argument that is very

25:34

convincing to people who like Donald

25:35

Trump he says look here's what I'm going

25:37

to do I'm going to sit down with people

25:39

on the left and we're gonna sit down

25:40

with people all right and we're going to

25:41

come to a compromise on how many weeks

25:44

and when you're going to have a solution

25:45

on abortion

25:47

a lot of people hear that and they're

25:48

like hell yeah Trump's gonna solve the

25:50

problems he's a fantastic salesperson

25:53

very very smart very very very smart

25:56

approach you can't alienate anyone like

25:58

that

25:59

when you just say I'm gonna solve it

26:01

it's very smart it is it is a very very

26:03

smart approach

26:05

editorial board says he should come out

26:07

and actually give his position how many

26:09

weeks is it Mr Trump

26:12

Donald Trump is also encouraged to give

26:15

some insight on his tariff and trade

26:18

policies for example the editorial board

26:20

here suggests hey you know Trump you've

26:22

been talking about imposing a 10 tariff

26:24

on all U.S Imports that's going to cost

26:27

somewhere around 300 billion dollars a

26:29

year and potentially lead to some

26:31

retaliation from other countries what

26:34

say you about that why don't you come

26:35

debate that now obviously a lot of

26:39

Donald Trump supporters are going to say

26:40

look Trump doesn't need to debate we

26:43

know what he's like as president and

26:44

quite frankly how much is he really

26:46

going to be able to answer in a debate

26:48

and I actually have to agree with that I

26:50

actually don't think you're going to get

26:51

the most color out of Donald Trump in a

26:53

debate because these debates are all

26:55

just

26:56

like little news Snippets clipping

26:58

that's all these debates really are you

27:01

get these things answered in an

27:02

interview that's when you get these done

27:04

we need to interview Donald Trump

27:05

petition meet Kevin date of your Donald

27:08

Trump somebody make it happen anyway

27:11

I think this is very interesting because

27:13

Donald Trump was Mr tariff on aluminum

27:17

steel Chinese Imports when we were

27:19

talking about tariffs between 10 to 25

27:21

percent so he's done this before

27:25

now something that I do think is very

27:27

interesting is you have uh some talk

27:30

about these 10 tariffs potentially being

27:34

costly not just because of the fact that

27:37

it will make things more expensive given

27:40

that we've got about three trillion

27:41

dollars of trade to the tune of about 10

27:43

so 300 billion dollars a year somebody

27:45

has to pay for that

27:46

but the tax foundation for example and

27:49

they're super anti this idea by the way

27:51

of a 10 tariff a lot of economists don't

27:53

like tariffs because there's always

27:54

deadweight loss here but anyway what

27:57

they argue is that not only would we

27:58

Face inflation higher prices but that we

28:01

would actually hit our GDP because of

28:04

the response we would end up getting

28:05

from foreign governments they expect

28:09

that a 10 tariff on All Imports would

28:12

reduce US GDP by 0.7 percent and

28:15

eliminate 505 000 full-time jobs now of

28:19

course this is a protectionist policy

28:21

When Donald Trump says I am going to do

28:23

a 10 tariff and we're gonna have a

28:24

shield around America what he's saying

28:26

is we're going to invest in America

28:27

we're going to make America more

28:29

competitive by making other stuff more

28:32

expensive like Chinese Goods more

28:34

expensive

28:35

and to some extent there could be a way

28:38

to argue that this is functional and I'm

28:40

going to show you how this could be

28:41

functional but first let me give you the

28:43

bear piece the bear case on this is

28:45

negative point seven percent to GDP and

28:48

a loss of 505 000 jobs that's the bear

28:52

piece right here but it's not just that

28:54

after all of the retaliation that we

28:57

might get from foreign governments we

28:59

might further reduce GDP another 0.4

29:01

percent and eliminate another 322 000

29:04

jobs this means potentially eliminating

29:06

over 825

29:08

000 jobs and shrinking the economy by

29:10

about 1.1 percent in other words they're

29:12

going as far as saying maybe Donald

29:14

Trump could literally push us into a

29:16

recession

29:17

if he went for this 10 cut

29:22

okay uh or ten percent tariff I should

29:25

say the bank of England by the way just

29:27

left rates unchanged after they're lower

29:29

than expected inflation read so keep

29:31

that uh keep an eye on some news coming

29:33

out from the bank of England and this

29:35

idea that maybe maybe the central banks

29:38

are going to talk tough but they're all

29:40

secretly at Peak levels

29:43

uh anyway okay so this is the bear piece

29:46

on Donald Trump right so what is

29:48

potentially a positive argument on this

29:51

since I do want to give both sides of

29:52

this okay so this the other flip side

29:55

argument of this is actually written by

29:58

somebody you wouldn't think would write

30:00

this it's actually coming from the left

30:03

and what professors and economists from

30:06

the left are arguing is that a 301

30:10

Authority allowing Donald Trump to

30:12

potentially unilaterally Institute uh

30:14

these these tariffs could end up leading

30:17

anyone close to America to benefit while

30:22

punishing anyone outside the circle

30:24

think about it kind of like the circle

30:27

of trust you remember Meet the Fockers

30:29

and Meet the Parents the movie was great

30:32

okay Robert De Niro there's a circle and

30:36

you're either in it or you're not so

30:38

think about it like this circle of trust

30:41

here's the circle

30:42

here's you China

30:44

and let's bring in anybody we want

30:46

Mexico come on in Canada come on in did

30:50

you know that if you combine

30:53

trade between Mexico and Canada you

30:58

actually have almost three times as much

31:01

trade between America Mexico and Canada

31:03

as you do between America and China

31:07

how crazy is that most people don't

31:10

realize that or think about that I'll

31:12

give you the exact numbers here because

31:14

I think it's worth seeing and then I

31:16

want to tell you about this circle but

31:17

let's look at the exact numbers right

31:20

here so what do we have right here look

31:22

at this trade with Mexico accounted for

31:24

15.4 percent of goods exported and

31:27

imported by the US

31:29

just ahead of America's totals

31:32

with Canada at 15.2 percent we'll add

31:36

that together what do you get

31:37

15.4 plus 15.2 percent that's 30.6

31:41

percent where does China sit at 12 so

31:45

30.6 divided by 12

31:47

is

31:50

2.55 times as much trade

31:53

goes to Canada and Mexico combined with

31:55

the United States

31:57

when you compare it to China

31:59

China amounting just to 12 and again

32:02

Mexico and Canada amounting to 30.6 it's

32:06

kind of wild a lot of people like oh we

32:08

trade so much with China

32:11

to be surprised actually trade a lot

32:13

more with our domestic Partners via free

32:15

trade and this is uh thanks to you know

32:17

the agreements that we have the

32:19

alliances that we have between China and

32:21

Canada but it's actually very

32:22

interesting because if you go to this

32:23

meet the fonkers idea

32:25

you could actually set Donald Trump up

32:28

with his 10 tariffs to negotiate the

32:32

winners on the inside of the circle and

32:34

then Target the pain to countries like

32:37

China which could be then a tool or even

32:39

Russia which could then be a tool to

32:42

limit their ability to maybe invade

32:43

Taiwan or otherwise

32:47

listen to this ultimately Donald Trump's

32:49

plan could result in a new U.S led

32:52

system of managed trade with terms that

32:55

are beneficial to the US and its allies

32:57

while punishing anyone outside the club

32:59

like China despite the rise of China

33:02

Hawks and Washington this plan will

33:04

undoubtedly provoke a big backlash from

33:08

U.S companies but that never stopped

33:11

Donald Trump from using America's most

33:13

powerful trade tools to deliver his

33:15

campaign promises

33:16

see look I'm trying my goal is to be

33:19

unbiased here it's my goal we can be

33:22

unbiased we can give you both sides of

33:25

the spectrum that's very very important

33:28

speaking of the spectrum

33:30

you know what's on the Spectrum Apple

33:33

but maybe not with their own modem

33:37

Wall Street Journal now running this

33:39

spectacular piece called inside Apple's

33:42

spectacular failure to build a key part

33:45

for its new iPhones it's basically a

33:47

fantastic piece about how Apple has no

33:50

freaking idea what they're doing with

33:51

modems that they can build chips like

33:55

the M2 chips or a17 ships and that these

33:58

are actually easier to build

34:01

but modem chips are hard because you

34:03

need them to work with 2G 3G 4G LTE

34:07

networks a 5G networks uh and apple

34:10

chips have been overheating they haven't

34:13

been able to assemble the the uh

34:16

experts within uh Apple the employees to

34:20

actually be able to pull it off

34:22

back in 2017 Apple's like we're done

34:24

with you Qualcomm we quote hate your

34:27

guts is what insiders at Apple say that

34:30

Apple hates qualcomm's guts that Apple

34:33

Sued Qualcomm in 2017 they ended up

34:36

settling this in 2019.

34:40

but Apple

34:41

now capitulated and said you know what

34:43

we're we've announced a deal that we're

34:45

actually just going to work with

34:46

Qualcomm throughout 2026 because we

34:49

can't get our own act together Apple

34:51

really wants to profit more from having

34:53

their own chips in fact when Apple moved

34:56

to their own M2 chips away from Intel

34:59

the expectation is that Apple was able

35:02

to make 75 to 150 more per computer in

35:06

profit because they had their own

35:08

in-house chips margin baby that's

35:11

pricing power that's delicious but

35:14

they're failing on the modems but you

35:16

know what maybe that's not so bad

35:18

because look at this folks those

35:20

Qualcomm modems apparently are actually

35:22

really good look at this test and I was

35:25

actually looking at this quite a bit

35:27

because I'm like ah do I want the iPhone

35:29

15 I don't know you know I've been

35:31

really complaining about the iPhone 15

35:33

and I was comparing the Qualcomm chip in

35:35

the iPhone 14 to the iPhone 15 and spec

35:38

Wise It's not obvious that it's any

35:41

better when you compare the specs it

35:43

looks like you've got the same bands the

35:44

same antenna but it is the new dress

35:48

Super Dragon chip from Qualcomm and when

35:51

you put it through tests at least

35:53

speedsmart.net pulled off some tests

35:55

look at some of the tests they pulled

35:57

off upload bands you're roughly the same

36:01

so for those of you like me who are

36:03

uploading YouTube videos maybe those

36:06

upload speeds won't be any faster on an

36:08

iPhone 15 compared to a 14. they'll

36:11

definitely be faster compared to an

36:12

iPhone 13. but look at those download

36:14

speeds

36:16

download speeds somewhere up to 24

36:19

faster on Verizon you're going to 243

36:23

versus 195 megabits down 300 versus 245

36:27

T-Mobile 204 versus 178 on 18t those are

36:31

significant download speed improvements

36:34

that's actually that's that's kind of

36:37

tempting

36:39

that's not the only thing that's kind of

36:41

tempting uh I'm going to talk about a

36:43

second thing that's pretty tempting

36:44

about the iPhone 15. right after I

36:45

mentioned did you know

36:47

that apple

36:49

apparently stole about 40 of Google Maps

36:52

business thanks to releasing Apple Maps

36:55

yeah here's a piece by uh the uh The

36:59

Insider via or I'm sorry the information

37:00

via Yahoo finance suggesting that almost

37:04

two years later we were at 40 of the

37:06

prior Peak Google insiders talking about

37:09

the loss to Apple Maps being potentially

37:12

about 40 percent of Google Maps volumes

37:15

on uh on cell phones wild shows you the

37:18

power of Apple but it's not just this

37:21

folks you know the other thing that I

37:24

respectfully haven't paid attention to

37:26

as much as I should have

37:28

the fact of 3D spatial video

37:33

now I'm going to show you something that

37:34

I think is pretty cool about spatial

37:35

video it's a little nerdy but uh take a

37:38

look at this clip on spatial video if

37:40

you don't have the iPhone 15 you're not

37:43

going to have the ability to record

37:44

video in spatial video why do you care

37:47

about this because if you have babies

37:49

that happen to be born soon because I

37:52

got twins on the way and who knows maybe

37:54

more for next year maybe there's

37:56

something Kevin hasn't talked about yet

37:58

and you want spatial video of these

38:00

children

38:01

maybe not while they're on their way out

38:03

but you know after when they're born

38:05

you gotta have the iPhone 15. it's like

38:08

remember for a moment what spatial video

38:10

is here it is this is what it would look

38:13

like on the Apple Vision Pro you live a

38:15

memory as if you're right back in the

38:18

exact moment

38:20

[Music]

38:23

hey Dad now this is super nerdy but take

38:27

a look at this this is how they explain

38:29

to developers what spatial video is and

38:33

it's an apple provided video and

38:35

basically they're like hey look at that

38:37

text that popped up on screen doesn't

38:39

that actually feel weird like where

38:42

things are can create depth conflict and

38:46

depth conflict is something that we have

38:48

to resolve but basically if you look

38:51

closely on screen now you can see that

38:53

the image that is technically the left

38:56

photo

38:57

shows more of that flower to the left of

39:01

that bird's head than the Right image

39:05

and as they merge these two together you

39:09

get the feeling of depth it's basically

39:13

because you have a left eye and a right

39:15

eye right and therefore you see things

39:16

slightly differently and that gives you

39:18

depth perception and now you can mimic

39:21

that with apple Vision Pro this is

39:25

really cool and so if you were looking

39:26

for a reason for the iPhone 15 I don't

39:29

know that is pretty tempting I don't

39:30

know what it's gonna actually look like

39:32

yet I probably want to try it out in the

39:34

Apple Store the Apple Vision Pro headset

39:35

isn't out yet anyway but I will say very

39:38

very very cool Apple the news a pollen

39:40

is potentially threatening and not to

39:43

supply weapons to Ukraine anymore but

39:45

quite frankly they've kind of already

39:47

given everything that they have in their

39:49

Arsenal and they're waiting to get

39:50

resupplied by America so they don't

39:52

really have anything to gain anyway and

39:54

this is really just emotional posturing

39:56

the idea here is that Poland is tired of

39:59

a Ukraine dumping cheap Grain on

40:02

European countries and so a lot of

40:04

European countries have actually been

40:06

Banning the importation of Ukrainian

40:09

grain there's a lot of drama going on

40:11

around this I don't know that any of

40:13

this is really a massive deal I wanted

40:14

to address it because I know people are

40:16

going to ask about it but it is not that

40:20

big of a deal something to keep an eye

40:22

on but that's about it it's also worth

40:24

noting that oil is trading in heavy

40:27

backwardation right now that basically

40:29

means that oil futures for the next year

40:31

are trading well below 90 dollars per

40:33

barrel anywhere between 88 in January

40:36

all the way down to 80 next August so

40:39

you prices where oil are right now or

40:42

unrealistically high they're not going

40:44

to last that long you've got a lot of

40:45

trading going into this this is as we

40:47

saw with hedge funds a lot of nonsense

40:49

going into this Beyond this there is

40:52

actually a real chance we might end up

40:53

having some more near-term volatility

40:56

thanks to yeah the potential of

40:58

revisiting a government shutdown it's

41:01

not me saying this it's not me trying to

41:03

be political okay this is straight up

41:05

from Punchbowl news these folks are

41:08

pretty dang good at uh you know calling

41:10

what's going to end up happening and uh

41:12

let me uh let me give you the Thursday

41:15

morning briefing here are you ready for

41:16

this here we go McCarthy gave in to the

41:19

right he pushed his moderates to follow

41:21

him and is pursuing a plan that'll be

41:23

dead on arrival with the Senate and the

41:25

White House it very well could lead the

41:28

government to a shutdown on October 1st

41:29

in fact it may be unavoidable at this

41:32

point basically here's what McCarthy's

41:34

going to do he's going to try to pass a

41:36

stop cap funding bill but a lot of

41:38

Republicans aren't going to go for this

41:40

unless it has many cuts to discretionary

41:42

spending so they're going to give

41:44

Democrats in the Senate and Joe Biden in

41:46

the White House a 1.47 trillion dollar

41:49

level in discretionary spending that's

41:51

what Republicans are trying to go for

41:52

Democrats want more money they're also

41:55

not going to include any Ukrainian money

41:57

or disaster relief money both of those

41:59

things are what Democrats want they want

42:01

Ukrainian money they want disaster

42:02

relief money even some Republicans are

42:04

like please provide the Ukrainian money

42:07

like Lindsey Graham Collins whatever

42:10

it's not gonna happen so you're gonna

42:12

have another Showdown

42:14

then McCarthy's going to be between a

42:18

rock and a hard place McCarthy's going

42:19

to have to decide do I actually put

42:21

something together

42:23

that Democrats are going to go for

42:25

because we have a split Congress or do I

42:28

hold firm remember Donald Trump is

42:31

really aggressive I wrote this down over

42:33

here as well McCarthy has it well they

42:35

wrote McCarthy has a tough decision to

42:37

make I wrote Trump pressure as well

42:38

Trump's the guy who's going to be on TV

42:41

every day going you know

42:43

I would hold firm I would get America's

42:46

budget back into balance whether it's

42:49

true or not we've seen Donald Trump do

42:50

the hard line I'm not I'm not doing

42:54

anything until I get my border wall

42:55

funding and I'll shut the government

42:57

down I don't care

42:59

he pulled that off before so we know

43:02

he's done it now the question is is

43:04

McCarthy gonna do it is he going to be

43:06

willing to risk a government shutdown

43:08

I don't think so I don't think McCarthy

43:10

will end up pulling that off uh and

43:12

that's likely going to lead to more

43:15

Republicans and people like Donald Trump

43:16

saying things like uh well that's

43:18

McCarthy for you

43:21

government shutdown could be on its way

43:24

so what else is there to talk about well

43:27

folks

43:28

I want to be very clear about this I

43:30

really do believe there are going to be

43:31

some beautiful opportunities coming up

43:33

for Real Estate I think house hack as

43:35

the Vanguard of real estate is going to

43:37

be extremely well positioned to take

43:38

advantage of these opportunities and if

43:41

you're not ready to buy real estate you

43:42

don't have the cash to buy real estate

43:44

the credit to buy real estate uh the

43:46

knowledge to buy real estate consider

43:48

diversifying your investments from

43:50

volatile stocks or other Investments

43:52

take a bit and invest into house hack

43:55

really excited we've got some new uh

43:58

tiered benefits as well by the way we're

44:00

going to be announcing those so if you

44:02

invest I think the first break is at

44:04

about 19 600 bucks somewhere right

44:06

around there uh and then uh 25 000 and

44:09

then uh I think there's one at seventy

44:12

thousand and a hundred thousand anyway

44:13

you'll get some benefits like video

44:15

shout outs uh you'll uh potentially be

44:18

able to Shadow us uh for free if you

44:20

invest a certain amount and come see

44:22

what we're actually doing with Hal Sac

44:24

it's uh on the ground no cost to you

44:27

which is very fun

44:28

so uh there'll be some really cool

44:30

benefits but learn more first about how

44:31

Sac what we're doing what the vision is

44:33

just go to housseight.com read the

44:34

prospectus understand the risks involved

44:37

look at the pitch deck look at the video

44:39

learn everything about house hack we're

44:41

really excited about the fundraise that

44:42

we're doing and we're gonna be closing

44:44

that fundraise as well uh probably

44:46

within the next 30 days we'll see it's

44:48

going very very well so far so thank you

44:50

to all of you who have invested we've

44:52

already doubled what we've had people

44:54

invest the first 24 hours of the first

44:57

time we raised money last year we've

44:59

already doubled that in the first 24

45:00

hours which is really amazing great vote

45:02

of confidence so thank you big shout out

45:04

to all of y'all now before we finish I

45:06

did promise a brief analysis on

45:08

matterport so matterport stock is in the

45:11

toilet I've been out of the stock since

45:12

January of 2022. I love matterport as a

45:16

tool but as a stock

45:19

it's not that great it might have some

45:21

more pain ahead of it it's not two bucks

45:23

and 19 cents right now and so I decided

45:25

to look at their earnings it's got like

45:27

a 659 million dollar market cap still

45:29

too much in my opinion uh and and I

45:32

think there's still more downside but

45:33

here's the problem you've got negative

45:35

cash flow in the last six months you're

45:36

losing 110 million bucks net cash from

45:39

operating activities so your free cash

45:41

flow once you take out plant property

45:43

and Equipment sitting around negative 33

45:45

million dollars for six months this is a

45:49

lot of money that's that's Vanishing

45:51

here and where is that money going well

45:53

when you look at the income statement

45:54

you see that a lot of money is going to

45:57

SG a and a lot of that is stock based

46:00

compensation this company is getting

46:01

squeezed for stock compensation where

46:04

they can't even figure out how to make a

46:05

profitable product yet and it really

46:07

pisses me off you've got good

46:09

subscription revenues that's profitable

46:11

you got 13 million dollars of profit in

46:13

your subscription revenues but on

46:15

Services you're barely making money a

46:17

couple mil product you're losing money

46:19

and when you factor in the 18.8 million

46:22

in r d and 56 in SG a what is this

46:29

this is supporting the livelihoods of

46:31

Executives and Senior staff at

46:33

matterport not the actual product

46:36

it's frustrating to me to see this now

46:39

balance sheet wise I see why they still

46:42

have some hope they have over 400

46:45

million dollars of cash somewhere around

46:46

440 million dollars worth of cash

46:48

short-term Investments so your cash and

46:50

cash equivalents they don't have a lot

46:52

of debt less than 100 bill in short

46:54

terms and long-term payables

46:56

therefore they have shareholder Equity

46:58

of about 551 million dollars a lot of

47:00

that cash in short-term uh Investments

47:03

which is great which means they do have

47:05

the ability to weather the storm for a

47:07

little bit longer consider if they have

47:10

negative cash flow of only about 15

47:12

million a quarter they can weather the

47:14

storm for a while and that's a benefit

47:16

they could go through 26 quarters of

47:20

losing 15 million dollars of cash flow

47:22

heck they could just take their entire

47:25

net loss of 50 mil and at 50 mil if that

47:28

all came out of cash they could get

47:30

through two years of cash burn so there

47:33

is a potential upside in that they have

47:36

the cash to burn

47:37

but I'm not convinced that matterport is

47:41

in a position to end up proving that it

47:45

can continue to grow to where its

47:48

revenues will ever offset it's SG A and

47:51

R D expenses

47:52

and that will keep the stock compressed

47:55

because eventually that cash will be

47:57

gone and if you haven't grown to become

47:59

profitable by then

48:01

that's when you start trending towards

48:03

BK I don't think matterport's going to

48:04

go BK but they do need to either cut

48:07

expenses substantially or become a whole

48:10

lot more profitable and this is not the

48:12

environment to grow in

48:13

sorry nobody's no nobody's selling homes

48:18

there are no transactions it's Rick is

48:21

cohort you got to get in with the

48:22

property managers and contractors but I

48:25

don't even think they're advertising

48:26

appropriately to them that's always been

48:28

my suggestion I feel like I want to go

48:30

in there and take the company by the

48:31

helm and turn this company around but I

48:33

don't have the money to Elon Musk this

48:35

company and fix it but anyway I do have

48:38

my frustrations about the company and uh

48:41

I think it just remains an Untouchable

48:43

for now why not advertise these things

48:45

that you told us here I feel like nobody

48:47

else knows about this we'll try a little

48:49

advertising and see how it goes

48:50

congratulations man you have done so

48:51

much people love you people look up to

48:53

you Kevin path right there financial

48:55

analyst and YouTuber meet Kevin always

48:57

great to get your take

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.