TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Driving Innovation at the Edge: Chuck Gershman on AI, Silicon and Safer Autonomous Vehicles

33m 30s5,679 words811 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

[Music]

0:08

hi friends welcome again to another

0:10

episode of beyond the clouds EDG to Edge

0:13

transformation and transformation has to

0:15

happen at every level I've been meeting

0:18

some amazing entrepreneurs and Chuck uh

0:21

I met him at a silicon Catalyst

0:24

presentation for the last six months it

0:26

was really amazing to hear the story of

0:28

all autonomous Imaging for once AI

0:32

doesn't start for artificial

0:34

intelligence actually it does a little

0:36

bit we we use AIML in our system the AI

0:41

has a double on Tandra in this

0:43

particular case on purpose that's

0:45

perfect so uh Chuck tell us how did you

0:48

end up being the Chuck of that we know

0:51

now and how did you end up being in this

0:53

company which is so

0:55

amazing well I've been in the tech

0:58

industry for three plus decades um I've

1:01

had a very extensive career on the

1:04

semiconductor uh side um I've also

1:07

worked in iot and networking both on the

1:11

digital and analog side of the business

1:13

so a long long career at the chip level

1:17

um at the subsystem level and even at

1:19

the system level in some of the

1:20

companies so seen a little bit of

1:22

everything and uh tell us a little bit

1:25

about all image and what do you guys do

1:27

so AI uh we is ay that um that I

1:31

co-founded with my partner Gan patii

1:33

roughly 5 years ago at the time Gan had

1:36

been working on Advanced uh imaging

1:40

technology in the thermal domain he and

1:43

I had worked on a project for the US Air

1:45

Force that was quite sophisticated uh

1:47

the beauty of that Air Force project was

1:49

it was a proof of concept and the

1:51

company that we worked for was able to

1:53

retain all the intellectual property

1:54

rights and that company's intellectual

1:57

property rights eventually came to us to

1:59

start start a new company so what got us

2:01

motivated and what we do at Ali is we

2:03

basically build a thermal night vision

2:05

system uh and then we couple that with

2:07

perception software specifically AIML

2:10

software and the purpose of that is

2:12

basically for safety so we build systems

2:15

that go into automobiles trucks cars

2:17

buses that are able to Independent of

2:21

the driver uh visualize the entire scene

2:25

and make uh real-time decisions on being

2:28

able to avoid collisions accidents

2:32

pedestrians animals Etc the system is

2:34

designed in such a way that the driver

2:36

of course could take action first but if

2:38

the driver fails to respond the system

2:40

can take over an ample time to make a

2:42

safety decision uh and the goal of the

2:44

company is simply to save

2:47

lives and honestly when you told us

2:50

about the data uh how many pedestrians

2:53

get hurt especially when it's dark that

2:56

was quite uh quite alarming uh can you

2:59

tell us a little bit about that yeah so

3:01

the statistics are not at all comforting

3:04

in any way shape or form annually 1.4

3:07

million people are killed in automobile

3:09

accidents it is a very very significant

3:12

um number however when you drill down on

3:14

the numbers and 1.4 is a big number half

3:17

of the people who are killed in car

3:19

accidents weren't actually in the car

3:21

they were pedestrians they were on

3:23

bicycles they were on motorcycles they

3:25

were on scooters they were walking down

3:26

the street um that's one out of every

3:29

two people killed and then if you drill

3:32

down even further you'll find that 76%

3:34

of those people actually were killed at

3:37

night and this incident rate occurs not

3:40

only for deaths but for just for any

3:42

kind of incident so basically you know

3:45

um automobile incidents at night is more

3:48

than three qus of all incidents that

3:50

occur especially when it comes to

3:52

fatalities uh it's quite staggering can

3:54

you combine this technology with many

3:57

other technologies that are existing in

3:59

the market

4:00

and if so how does it work in

4:02

tandem yeah so um in know we don't

4:06

Envision um nor do we Advocate uh that

4:10

the use of our particular sensor and

4:13

software suite should be used

4:14

independent of other sensors and

4:16

software that are already existing in

4:18

the vehicles or coming to market the

4:20

basic premise is that we fill a gap in

4:22

the overall sensor Suite with the

4:23

uniqueness of what we do uh we build a

4:25

system based on thermal imaging and then

4:28

computer vision based on thermal imaging

4:30

so there's still going to be visual

4:33

cameras in the cars and they're still

4:34

going to do what they do but they

4:36

degrade at night just like humans

4:38

degrade at night they degrade in foul

4:41

weather so whether it's raining snowing

4:43

sleep or if it's just Smoky or foggy um

4:46

cameras will degrade thermal cameras

4:48

their degradation in these conditions is

4:51

a couple orders of magnitude less

4:52

degradation we supplement these visual

4:54

cameras we supplement Radars we

4:57

supplement uh Imus we supplement all the

5:00

other sensors to make a more robust

5:03

overall system uh and again going back

5:06

to the statistics the nighttime

5:08

operation of these vehicles is

5:10

definitely in question just like humans

5:12

degrade at night in terms of their

5:14

visualization so do the current sensor

5:17

Suites that are in the cars and they

5:18

just need to be better you said you've

5:21

done some work with the Air Force have

5:23

you been able to do some testing of your

5:26

systems on the road and uh with humans

5:29

and this

5:31

point well um subsequent to our Air

5:34

Force work which was done before we

5:35

founded the company we have done work

5:37

with the dod uh a as Al U mainly for

5:41

what we call off-road so we've developed

5:44

systems that are not on pavement the

5:46

sensor systems obviously work fine but

5:49

the software systems need to be slightly

5:51

modified to work whether it's onroad or

5:53

off-road so yes we do that um and we've

5:56

already done that with the dod um but in

5:58

terms of actual testing so the national

6:03

highway traffic safety administration

6:04

which is part of the Department of

6:06

Transportation actually is is well aware

6:09

of the statistics that I just

6:11

articulated um and it has become quite

6:14

an issue so we've seen that the US

6:16

Congress under the infrastructure act

6:18

has actually created line items to

6:21

address um pedestrian safety uh as well

6:25

as the European Union has now created

6:28

regulatory respon so in the United

6:30

States we now have regulations out there

6:32

that are going to be mandatory by the

6:34

end of the year that says You must be

6:36

able to stop for a pedestrian at night

6:39

at high speed um and that's going to be

6:42

a minimum requirement to sell a vehicle

6:44

in the United States by 2028 we see

6:47

similar regulations in the in the

6:49

European Union so these problems are not

6:52

lost on governments now about a year ago

6:56

Nitsa published a preliminary um set of

6:59

recommendations which ultimately is

7:01

going to become the final regulations so

7:04

we took those

7:05

specifications uh we went out to Detroit

7:08

and rented time on a test track we took

7:11

a we got a test vehicle we took our our

7:13

full system we mounted it on the system

7:15

we hired a test driver and we hired a

7:18

third-party test company and we ran

7:20

through the suite of nit a test now you

7:24

said with real people we asked our

7:26

interns whether they wanted to volunteer

7:28

to run in front of the cars at 45 miles

7:30

an hour we couldn't get anybody to agree

7:33

so we Ed what's called electronic

7:36

dummies um so these are mannequins that

7:38

are on tracks they're heated um to give

7:41

a thermal signature and you drive the

7:45

vehicle down the track you hit a laser

7:47

that triggers a certain speed and time

7:50

and that triggers the dummy to run in

7:52

front of the vehicle such the time it

7:54

such that right when the car gets there

7:56

so that was the test that we did we did

7:58

this um 12 times times under different

8:00

configurations we never struck the dummy

8:02

now the same test that we were testing

8:04

against has been tested against 21

8:06

production vehicles and under the

8:08

conditions that we tested against almost

8:10

every one of those Vehicles ran over the

8:12

dummy at one point in time or more the

8:14

vehicles that are out there are not

8:16

currently capable of passing these tests

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.

    Driving Innovation at… - Full Transcript | YouTubeTranscript.dev