TRANSCRIPTEnglish

YIKES! Fed sees things "Going South Quickly"!

12m 42s1,976 words291 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

hey everyone me Kevin here oh boy the

0:02

Federal Reserve is now talking about the

0:04

potential for there to be a lot of room

0:08

to cut rates because things could go

0:10

south very quickly this in a piece out

0:14

from Nick t on my birthday yesterday by

0:18

the way if you haven't seen it yet I did

0:20

have the fortune of spending my birthday

0:23

lunch with Kathy Wood in Florida which

0:26

is really wild because then I had birth

0:30

a dinner with Lauren my wife in

0:33

California so it was a little bit of a

0:35

long day but technically that means I

0:38

had a 27-hour birthday H let that one

0:41

sink in anyway so plummeting inflation

0:45

that is Nick T's headline but what's

0:49

buried beneath the headline what's

0:51

buried beneath the headline is very

0:53

interesting we're going to start here

0:56

let's keep this simple let's say that

0:58

core inflation is is 4% and these

1:01

numbers aren't supposed to be exact this

1:02

is just to give you an example here okay

1:04

let's say core inflation is 4% let's say

1:07

the FED wants our star or are not no not

1:12

like Co days it's the level of

1:15

restriction that the FED has let's say

1:17

they want that level restriction to be

1:20

1.5% well then your total interest rate

1:23

at the FED would be 5 1.2% okay great

1:26

that's understandable but core PC isn't

1:29

4% it's lower than that it's probably

1:32

closer to 3% okay so let's throw on 3%

1:37

here and they want us to be at

1:39

5.5% okay fine so then we say this is

1:43

25% this is another way you could

1:45

achieve this but what happens when core

1:50

pce goes down and you don't change the

1:54

headline rate so in other words what

1:57

happens if we take this uh delicious

1:59

line line right here for core PC we drop

2:02

it all the way down over here so we

2:05

don't actually have 3% core PC we have

2:08

let's say

2:10

2% core pce well then to have the same

2:15

level of

2:17

restrictiveness we should actually be

2:19

cutting rates a full 1% to about

2:25

42% and the reason we would do that is

2:28

because if you don't cut rates while

2:30

inflation is falling you actually start

2:33

adding more tightness to the economy and

2:37

when you say you want to keep rates

2:39

higher for longer you're not trying to

2:41

keep things getting more restrictive for

2:44

longer or increasingly restrictive every

2:47

single month for longer because you're

2:49

adding more pressure to the economy and

2:51

you're likely to break something you're

2:53

likely to cause an unemployment style

2:57

recession large joblessness okay now we

3:02

understand this at least to some extent

3:04

the big thing to remember here the big

3:06

takeaway is if you don't cut as

3:09

inflation is falling you add more pain

3:13

okay fine well maybe more pain needs to

3:15

be added right I mean the inflation

3:17

figures are all rigged anyway they're

3:19

all fugazi fugazi and yeah to some

3:22

extent many of them are fugazi fugazi

3:25

but the FED bases their rates on that

3:28

Fugazi gazy okay so what did the Federal

3:32

Reserve think that inflation was going

3:35

to be at the end of

3:37

2023 all right so we look here end of

3:40

2023 projection and we could see this

3:43

projection was made September 20th all

3:46

right so what do we have September 20th

3:49

well September 20th we had projections

3:52

that pce inflation would be 3.3% and

3:56

that core PC would sit at

3:58

3.7% and in June the projection before

4:01

that we were at 32 to 37 or uh

4:05

3.9 so let's just take a midpoint here

4:08

for a moment so take a midpoint of these

4:11

projections let's say basically at the

4:13

end of the year the Federal Reserve

4:16

thought that inflation would be

4:19

3.25% on the headline and 3.8% on core

4:24

all we did here was take the difference

4:27

between the fed's Jun opinion and their

4:30

September opinion keeping in mind that

4:33

their last rate hike was in July in that

4:37

midpoint see that what was their

4:39

estimate of inflation here what was

4:40

their inflation estimate here for the

4:43

end of the year well that was between

4:45

3.25 and 2.8% what did we actually get

4:49

with the Rigg numbers well core pce

4:53

instead of being 3.8% for core PC we

4:57

actually got 2

5:01

.9%

5:03

2.9 and the annualized rate for the

5:07

year

5:09

2.4% well okay but what about headline

5:13

headline which was expected to be

5:15

3.25 well for headline we got

5:20

2.6 so in other words

5:23

substantially lower now that's very

5:26

interesting so

5:28

2.6 for non-core is about

5:32

625 per lower that's like 2 and a half

5:36

rate cuts of 25 BPS lower than what the

5:40

FED thought it was going to be and the

5:42

core figure was about 30 basis points

5:44

lower than what the FED thought it was

5:46

going to be but not only that this is

5:48

where it gets a little ridiculous Nick T

5:51

makes this really interesting analogy

5:53

well I guess I shouldn't say it's really

5:54

an analogy it's kind of just pointing

5:57

out by Logic here that it might actually

6:00

be even worse than what I've just

6:03

described the reason is he says in the

6:06

last 6 months if you annualize what PC

6:10

inflation has been over the last 6

6:11

months you actually end up finding that

6:13

inflation has

6:15

been

6:18

1.9% okay so that's interesting so the

6:21

Federal Reserve is

6:23

potentially way behind in other words

6:26

they've already gotten inflation

6:28

substantially down at least via

6:30

pce and the fugazi numbers this doesn't

6:34

mean prices are lower remember the

6:36

Federal Reserve isn't actually trying to

6:39

get inflation lower they're not actually

6:42

trying to get prices lower like the

6:45

inflation all the crap we felt from

6:47

2019 they don't really care about you

6:50

they don't really care about you having

6:53

normalized prices again and going back

6:56

to 2019 prices they don't care how do

6:59

you know that because they bluntly told

7:02

us that in the December fomc meeting

7:04

Dron pal bluntly responded to a reporter

7:07

who asked hey what do you say to the

7:09

people who are upset everything is so

7:12

much more expensive and his response was

7:15

well we hope they can make more

7:17

money in other words good luck prices

7:20

ain't coming down anytime soon mhm so

7:24

where does this idea of a lot of room to

7:26

cut come from and where does this idea

7:28

come from about potentially a very rapid

7:31

decline things going south very rapidly

7:34

well actually comes right from the FED

7:36

as well quick note this video is brought

7:38

to you by streamyard check it out

7:40

metkevin.com streamyard they help me

7:42

multistream broadcast every time I go

7:44

live which I do every day the market is

7:46

open for the market open live stream

7:49

take a look at this first of all there's

7:51

the evidence of the 1.9% that I talked

7:53

about about the annualized rate of PC

7:54

inflation between July and December down

7:57

from 4% in the prior six-month period

7:59

but listen to this Esther George who

8:02

left the FED at the end of last year so

8:04

potentially could be a little bit more

8:05

transparent says we made a very

8:06

aggressive tightening not only uh look

8:10

at the supply that came back but also

8:12

the demand that came back uh uh you know

8:14

down last year but more importantly

8:16

listen to this there's potentially a lot

8:19

of room to cut rates before they are in

8:22

neutral territory again and you've still

8:25

got quantitative tightening restricting

8:28

the economy in her words on

8:31

steroids and on top of this listen to

8:33

this policy makers are right to be

8:36

worried that cutting would blemish their

8:38

credibility however in November the

8:42

hiring rate in the United States dropped

8:43

to its lowest level in 10 years a sign

8:47

that more companies might feel they are

8:49

overstaffed the labor market is a tricky

8:52

one before a downturn it always looks

8:55

like it's not too bad and then it goes

8:58

south quickly in other words the fed's

9:01

got to be very careful here if they

9:04

really start inducing an unemployment

9:06

recession we're screwed now what's my

9:10

opinion out of all of this and what's

9:12

Kathy Wood's opinion because we talked

9:13

about this at lunch yesterday well her

9:16

opinion is the Fed has already gone way

9:18

too far and they're not going to be able

9:21

to prevent deflation by cutting rates I

9:25

also believe the FED has gone too far

9:27

but I re I believe the FED at least

9:30

maybe I'm hopeful will realize that will

9:33

cut rates and while there will be a

9:35

surge in

9:36

unemployment I hopeful that they're able

9:39

to minimize the real damage of

9:43

increasing layoffs which have already

9:45

begun so in other words I have slightly

9:47

more hope than Kathy uh in other words

9:49

she believes we are almost certainly

9:51

heading into deflation I think they'll

9:53

be able to print their way out of

9:55

deflation and kind of keep the Ponzi

9:56

going a little

9:58

longer we'll see nobody knows but the

10:01

point is Federal Reserve through their

10:04

Nicki leaks Wall Street Journal buddy is

10:07

starting to signal

10:09

that we may need to come down frankly

10:13

just because inflation is coming in way

10:15

lower than expected maybe it'll heat up

10:18

again but the data doesn't seem like

10:21

it's indicating that it is and if we

10:23

look at the earnings calls we do every

10:25

day in the course member live streams

10:26

what do we find lack of companies

10:29

indicating they are remotely willing to

10:31

raise prices or even if they're willing

10:33

or unable to talked to Kathy about that

10:36

yesterday as well and she was shocked at

10:39

what Texas Instruments and 3M told us

10:43

about the lack of growth the negative

10:46

growth the frankly negative growth they

10:49

are forecasting so with all that said

10:52

and those manufacturing indicators

10:54

economic indicators causing potentially

10:56

more cause for concern what's dra Powell

10:59

going to tell us this week when the fomc

11:02

meeting takes place which of course I'll

11:04

be streaming in a couple days on

11:05

Wednesday well probably exactly what we

11:09

just talked about now we won't get a

11:11

rate cut this Wednesday but we are

11:13

expecting to see the balance of the FED

11:16

saying we might have to cut just to stay

11:19

at the same level of restrictiveness we

11:21

might see them try to explain that to

11:23

markets which potentially to stocks

11:26

could be bullish if they don't the lack

11:29

of them suggesting this could be bearish

11:31

we'll see what happens thanks for

11:33

watching check out streamyard a link

11:34

down below paid sponsor on the channel

11:35

and we'll see you in the next one

11:36

goodbye why not advertise these things

11:38

that you told us here I feel like nobody

11:39

else knows about this we'll we'll try a

11:41

little advertising and see how it goes

11:43

congratulations man you have done so

11:44

much people love you people look up to

11:46

you Kevin PA there financial analyst and

11:48

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

11:50

your

11:51

take even though I'm a licensed

11:53

financial adviser real estate broker and

11:55

becoming a stock broker this video is

11:56

neither personalized Financial advice

11:58

nor real estate advice for you it is not

12:00

tax legal or otherwise personalized

12:01

advice tailored to you this video

12:03

provides generalized perspective

12:05

information and commentary any third

12:06

party content I show should not be

12:08

deemed endorsed by me this video is not

12:10

and shall never be deemed reasonably

12:11

sufficient information for the purpose

12:13

of evaluating a security or investment

12:14

decision any links or promoted products

12:16

are either paid affiliations or products

12:18

or Services which we may benefit from I

12:20

personally operate and actively managed

12:22

ETF and hold long positions in various

12:24

Securities potentially including those

12:26

mentioned in this video however I have

12:28

no Rel relationship to any issuers other

12:30

than house act nor am I presently acting

12:32

as a market

12:38

maker

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.