TRANSCRIPTEnglish

SH*T SH*T | New Fed Report Changes EVERYTHING.

27m 45s4,875 words695 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

oh boy y'all almost got me I almost

0:04

flipped I almost

0:08

flipped it's like

0:11

ohoo that Temptation oh my gosh I I wow

0:17

yes ah that was that was very close for

0:20

those of you who know what I'm talking

0:21

about great for those of you who don't

0:23

know I'm sorry but we are going to talk

0:26

about that job's data yesterday and

0:28

frankly I didn't post video yesterday

0:30

because it literally took me well I was

0:32

also flying for house hack and looking

0:34

at properties but in between doing all

0:36

that it it essentially took me the last

0:37

24 hours to really figure out and

0:41

understand what is going on what path

0:44

we're on where we are in the economy now

0:48

and what you need to look for as well as

0:51

potentially how to position a portfolio

0:52

around this now because I did not post

0:56

yesterday In fairness to all those of

0:58

you who are curious

1:00

yes I'm going to have a big portfolio

1:03

talk on Monday where I talk trades

1:07

companies and hedges and any kind of

1:10

adjustment trades potentially millions

1:12

of dollars worth on Monday in the course

1:14

member live so I did extend the coupon

1:17

to 11:59 p.m. on Sunday because I didn't

1:20

post yesterday and there was no reminder

1:21

for you so if you want to be a part of

1:23

that course member live on Monday and

1:25

you want to get that for life all the

1:27

future course member lives we do that or

1:30

analyses fundamentals trade alerts you

1:31

name it go to me kevin.com bu the stocks

1:34

and sight course watch lecture one

1:36

you're in

1:37

forever okay great so let's get into

1:40

what happened and it is true when when I

1:43

first heard this data that the last two

1:47

months the prior two months so uh July

1:49

and August which were pretty bad were

1:51

revised up by a net of roughly 70,000

1:54

jobs and September was absolutely

1:57

phenomenal I have to say I was a little

2:00

blown away I I thought to myself my gosh

2:02

okay well if all the bad data is being

2:04

revised away GDP is being revised away

2:06

construction job openings being revised

2:08

away and now a jobs being revised you

2:10

know the bad is being revised away like

2:13

the Bears were right to be bearish but

2:15

if it all the bearish data they were

2:17

using is being revised away then the

2:19

Bears are wrong to be bearish so then

2:21

I'm like oh

2:23

my you you have to flip then so the last

2:27

24 hours have gone deep

2:30

and of course we already know the basics

2:32

we we know the headline numbers we know

2:35

there's a lot of talk about how the

2:36

establishment survey showed uh over

2:39

800,000 government jobs created but the

2:43

establishment survey actually shows that

2:45

800,000 jobs as Jobs created on the uh

2:50

non-seasonally adjusted side and when

2:53

you seasonally adjust that goes to about

2:55

31,000 and honestly in the establishment

2:58

survey that's actually Fair because

3:00

those are almost all teachers but

3:02

there's there are deeper problems

3:04

including what the household survey says

3:06

I will explain those differences in

3:07

moment it does get a little nuanced and

3:09

I'm sorry in advanced but again it took

3:11

me like 24 hours to get through this so

3:12

an analysis uh starts with what yields

3:16

have done since

3:17

jpow you know gave us a 50 jpow gave us

3:20

a 50 and what happened we literally got

3:24

the 10year yield up 32 basis points the

3:26

2-year yield up 38 the one year is up 26

3:30

mortgage rates are up about 50 basis

3:32

points we've essentially gone across the

3:34

entire yield spectrum and we've made

3:37

everything tighter not looser which is

3:41

fine if you have an inflating economy

3:44

and a strongly growing economy it's okay

3:46

you would want to tighten rates in that

3:49

case so you don't you know overheat

3:51

essentially and create inflation which I

3:53

don't think a good economy is synon

3:55

synonymous with inflation anyway Cathy

3:57

wood agrees with this whether you like

3:58

her or not doesn't so much matter but

4:00

what really creates well if you're Peter

4:03

shiff it's the expansion of the money

4:04

supply but to me what really creates

4:05

inflation or consumer prices going up is

4:08

frankly stimulus otherwise Innovation uh

4:11

really leads to deflation the more we

4:13

invest in capex the more deflation we

4:15

get look at China they're frankly in

4:17

deflation people like oh but you know

4:19

this is going to cause inflation all the

4:21

stimulus they're so deep in the hole

4:24

they're so deep in the hole this is

4:26

really a topic for a different video but

4:29

uh the Point here is that you you know

4:30

you would expect yields to go up if you

4:32

thought things were really really good

4:34

so I thought okay well maybe things are

4:35

really good maybe I shouldn't be a bear

4:37

and let me go deep in this jobs report

4:39

so my take when I look at the jobs

4:42

report and it's going to be you know I'm

4:43

going to give you a little preview and

4:45

then we'll go through some of the

4:45

details my take is that we're roughly at

4:47

stall speed on a plane now now maybe

4:51

yall don't fly I I I don't fly I'm not a

4:53

pilot okay but like let's say you're

4:55

coming in for a landing with my little

4:56

toy jet here okay so so you're pitched

4:59

down a little bit you know 3% I don't

5:01

know 5% whatever so you're pitched down

5:03

but the plane's just going so slow that

5:06

you're not going to make it to the

5:08

runway now you could nose down but then

5:11

you're going to have a hard Landing

5:13

you're boom you might break your landing

5:15

gear or just crash okay so so you don't

5:18

want to nose down too much now you could

5:20

keep your pitch but you're going to have

5:22

to add speed because if you're at stall

5:25

speed you you you like you need to speed

5:27

up your plane again I'm not a pilot I'm

5:29

trying my best here okay you need to

5:30

speed up you need to add some gas add

5:32

some thrust everybody likes some thrust

5:34

right so we're flying a little too slow

5:37

to actually make it to the runway safely

5:39

we really need speed boost uh and then

5:42

we'll be okay if we pull up without

5:45

adding thrust then we're just going to

5:48

literally stall that's not going to be

5:51

good gosh I never thought this would

5:52

actually become useful uh oh I just

5:55

Tangled it I okay well I'll have to

5:58

untangle that God that looks terrible I

6:01

now have to untangle that uh right as I

6:03

say I never thought this would be useful

6:05

it actually becomes not useful it's

6:08

foreshadowing of the economy no uh okay

6:12

anyway so uh the the problems you have

6:16

here uh really start when we actually

6:19

get into the reports on what generally

6:23

happens on an annual basis now this gets

6:26

a little tricky so there are few things

6:29

to look at the first that I want to look

6:31

at is something called the uh level of

6:35

unemployed people usually working

6:39

fulltime now this by

6:42

itself isn't solely useful we have to

6:46

look at a lot of things here but let's

6:48

go ahead and look at usually full-time

6:51

if you look at this it kind of helps us

6:54

understand this stall speed that we're

6:56

at because if you go into the 82 or 80

6:58

recession you have a rapid crash if you

7:01

go into 91 you have a rapid decline in

7:04

this you go into 2001 rapid decline 2008

7:07

rapid decline what do you have over here

7:10

you have a stair step decline kind of

7:12

like a stair stepper at the gym decline

7:14

okay that is that normalization I don't

7:16

know stair step okay is that

7:18

normalization from the big spike I don't

7:20

know stair step oh gosh now we're

7:22

negative so the year-over-year change in

7:24

people employed usually full-time is now

7:26

negative which means we have fewer

7:28

people you like employed full-time who

7:31

usually are employed full-time which is

7:33

generally something you only see at the

7:36

earliest Midway through recession so who

7:38

knows maybe we're already in a recession

7:40

we we generally don't know if we're in a

7:41

recession until like a year later right

7:43

so you could already theoretically be in

7:45

it or you know maybe maybe this time

7:48

it's happening a little earlier who

7:49

knows you were negative over here at the

7:51

early portion of the 2001 recession

7:53

which would be like March of 01 so it

7:55

could be like technically in it or right

7:57

at the beginning of it or who

8:00

so this alone is not helpful but it does

8:02

show us that the stall speed is present

8:05

because if we're really growing we

8:07

should be seeing more people on a

8:10

month-over-month

8:11

basis working full-time so again I call

8:15

this the stair stepp or slowdown and

8:17

it's why I talk about stall speed this

8:20

is really driving me nuts I apologize uh

8:24

for this like just just look away for a

8:27

second but I I see it in the uh the

8:31

video monitor and it just drives me

8:34

absolutely nuts I cannot have I'm like

8:37

jpow okay I got to I got to fix this I

8:40

cannot have the plane like this it's

8:42

maybe it's an OCD thing uh uh now I've

8:46

really just janked it up there we

8:50

go I definitely screwed something up but

8:53

uh here all right it's a little better

8:56

[Music]

8:57

now I apologize ol for wasting your time

9:02

please fast forward the video and if for

9:05

whatever reason you can't then uh once

9:09

again I apologize I'll fix it later this

9:13

is a lot better than the stra that just

9:15

doesn't look good anyway all right

9:19

so next this is where things get really

9:22

like really start getting really

9:25

interesting the typical employment level

9:29

that we have in our

9:30

economy uh especially through the '90s

9:34

is around 2 million job gains created on

9:40

an annual basis keep in mind we still

9:42

have some real serious like juice to get

9:45

to don't get me started on table A8 okay

9:48

it's it's going to be pretty bad uh but

9:51

what I want you to do and you could do

9:52

this yourself too is just type into

9:55

Google St Louis Fred uh employ

9:59

employment level that's Fred with an r

10:02

in there I I know that's weird I I still

10:04

haven't figured out why they do that I

10:05

think it's Federal Reserve economic data

10:07

but whatever okay so when you get there

10:10

what I want you to do is I want you to

10:12

just do change from a year ago in

10:15

thousands of people okay uh and then

10:19

it's so noisy on the monthly so change

10:21

this to annual and then what I want you

10:23

to do I mean you could leave Co in here

10:26

if you want uh if you want to just make

10:27

it a little bit more clear you you could

10:29

get rid of Co just by scrolling over on

10:31

the right but let's just leave Co so

10:33

we'll leave the chart as it is look at

10:35

what a normal economy looks like for a

10:37

moment okay a normal economy sits in

10:39

this range right here I think we can all

10:42

agree that a normal economy somewhere in

10:44

this range right and look on the left

10:46

that would be somewhere between 1 and a

10:48

half to maybe 3 million jobs created per

10:52

year right that's a normal economy in

10:55

fact if you look at the '90s you were at

10:58

a normal level of job creation

11:01

throughout the entire '90s okay that's

11:03

interesting so where do we sit today

11:07

relative to that level of job creation

11:11

well we sit in a worse place because so

11:13

far we don't have this full years of

11:15

data but if we're trying to get to 2

11:18

million jobs created in the year on the

11:21

employment level where do we sit right

11:23

now so far year to date with three

11:25

quarters being done we sit at 314,000

11:29

q1 we lost 248,000 jobs so q1 that's

11:33

when you get the layoffs uh that was

11:35

2024 Q2 you got 62,000 jobs Q3 you got

11:38

264,000 add that together you're only

11:41

year-over-year or actually for this year

11:43

you're only up 314,000 jobs which

11:46

actually aligns with if you go all the

11:49

way back to last September you're also

11:51

roughly up about 300K jobs so in other

11:54

words like since last September we've

11:57

really been at that stall speed where

11:59

were like oh we don't have the thrust

12:01

anymore oh boy you know when you're on a

12:03

plane and they like pull back on the on

12:05

the uh thrust because you're you're

12:06

getting ready to land or like you just

12:08

took off and then they pull back on the

12:11

thrust and it's that like weird sinking

12:12

feeling you get like it's like oh what's

12:15

happening and really the pilots are just

12:17

trying to like level out or whatever but

12:18

everybody's always like oh my God we're

12:19

crashing like that's kind of the feeling

12:23

the Bears are feeling right now like

12:26

okay so so far

12:29

year over oh let me clarify this year

12:31

over-ear we're at 314,000 jobs created

12:34

from September to this September that's

12:36

way lower than the 2 million if you

12:38

actually add together just this year -

12:41

248 62 264 that's actually only 76,000

12:45

jobs created so far in the 9 months this

12:47

means the next 3 months are going to be

12:51

extremely critical because you need

12:54

October November and December to be

12:56

really freaking good so you could get

12:59

back to that normal growth period of

13:02

around 2 million jobs

13:05

created so now I'm going to show you

13:07

this screenshot because it's really

13:08

helpful okay here's the red line this is

13:11

what we were talking about with the 90s

13:13

right here where my M Mouse is right and

13:15

this is the normal trajectory I did Kill

13:17

Co out of here because it zooms in on

13:19

the chart makes it a little bit more

13:20

clear rather than having the big spike

13:22

up on the right okay so you normalize

13:25

this look at the times it went near

13:29

negative on the red line which is the

13:31

annual every time it goes near negative

13:35

you have this green circle you have a

13:38

recession so every time near negative

13:41

recession okay like every single time

13:45

there's not a time over here it goes to

13:46

near negative that you don't have a

13:49

recession however there are times it

13:52

doesn't go to negative and you still

13:54

have a recession see over here so it's

13:57

like either way if you go negative you

14:00

always have a recession if you don't go

14:03

negative you could still have a

14:05

recession because that's happened before

14:06

over here but having a low change in

14:10

thousands of people so millions of

14:11

people here of job gains having this be

14:14

at you know for the year

14:16

76,000 is

14:19

horrible it's really bad because you're

14:21

close to that that threshold of like

14:23

guaranteeing a recession okay but Kevin

14:25

like the job's data was so good are you

14:27

just trying to look for like bearish

14:28

information

14:30

okay well I I get it I I I like let me

14:32

just be transparent I want IPO house

14:35

hack like ASA freak compete if we go

14:37

into recession that's going to be harder

14:39

if we don't go into recession let's

14:41

freaking go you see what I'm saying okay

14:43

so like I don't want any

14:46

recession I just I just can't help

14:48

myself I'm looking at this data so

14:50

people like but Kevin the jobs numbers

14:51

were so good it was such a big number

14:53

okay well what happened in history well

14:57

right before the 1990 recession

14:59

in July we started the 990 recession in

15:02

may we had a job read of

15:03

299,000 huge Spike look at that green

15:06

circle right here is this is where you

15:08

really start turning negative into

15:09

recession but look at the blue the blue

15:11

shows you this huge Spike that you get

15:13

the blue is actually the quarterly but I

15:16

read it on the monthly and on the

15:17

monthly read you're at 299 this is a

15:20

huge Spike over here and you still went

15:22

into recession cuz the data is so

15:23

freaking volatile on the month over

15:25

month look at March the month the

15:28

recession began

15:29

employment spiked up

15:31

171,000 in households data and 3 months

15:34

earlier you spiked up 292,000 so in

15:37

other words you had these giant job

15:40

reports right before the 2001 recession

15:43

literally just two three months before

15:44

the recession you had these giant really

15:47

glorious jobs

15:48

reports and then you look at

15:51

2007 literally November of

15:55

2007 like right when the recession was

15:58

beginning

16:00

649,000 jobs created that followed -2 98

16:05

in October which came after two or 562

16:08

in September look at the volatility the

16:11

recession began in December right before

16:14

that it's like Yay Oh yay

16:18

crash so like over the past three

16:20

recessions outside of covid household

16:22

jobs spiked 171 to 649,000 in a single

16:26

month report and we still hit recession

16:29

and my guess is back then the markets

16:30

also rallied on these reports recession

16:32

still came because jobs is a lagging

16:34

freaking

16:35

indicator so like the month over month

16:37

data doesn't matter what really matters

16:39

is is this like how many jobs are we

16:42

actually going to create this year well

16:43

right now if we're at 314,000 you look

16:46

at this right here I drew this red line

16:48

just to show you if this red line on the

16:50

left is normal it's going to crash

16:53

you're going to crash to oops you're

16:55

going to crash to this low level right

16:58

here which would be uh this is the which

17:01

is in line with the quarterly numbers so

17:04

that's a really really bad pace you're

17:06

actually probably you know if I actually

17:07

get the number over here that's pretty

17:10

bad if the annual number is all the way

17:12

down here you're basically on the

17:14

doorstep of recession the annual number

17:17

the red line should be stable around

17:19

here in an expansionary time again we

17:22

need October November December data to

17:23

get us up because right now you know I

17:26

drew this line to 314,000 going year

17:28

year to September but we're not even at

17:30

314 so far this year to date again we're

17:33

at 76 which means we're basically I know

17:37

this chart's funny we're probably like

17:38

right there on top of the black line and

17:42

if these three reports come in negative

17:44

we will be in the hole and you're

17:46

basically going to guarantee a recession

17:48

uh okay and and usually you get Negative

17:51

job reports after a really big positive

17:53

report we just got a big positive report

17:55

now why well how about because of

17:57

revisions ah now this is an interesting

18:02

one buckle up for this one folks you're

18:04

going to want life insurance for this

18:05

one metkevin.com life paid promotion

18:08

you're going to want to get the courses

18:09

on building your wealth to know what's

18:10

going on with the portfolio on Monday

18:12

because this chart is this is

18:15

insane you do not want to see this chart

18:18

okay I'm going to show it to

18:19

you okay it's a table damn it Kevin you

18:22

said chart clickbait I'm sorry I'm sorry

18:25

sorry okay look at this you don't find

18:28

this table unless you dig down into A8

18:32

on the uh like like literally their 100

18:34

page document or whatever it's crazy and

18:37

if you go to government workers this was

18:38

insane first of all there's the

18:40

establishment survey which I opened this

18:42

video about I said 800,000

18:45

non-seasonally adjusted uh teachers got

18:48

adjusted to 31,000 establishment jobs

18:51

okay fine fine that seems normal because

18:54

they're mostly local

18:55

right but wait a minute

18:59

because they seasonally adjusted away

19:01

all of those teachers government workers

19:03

should basically be close to zero

19:05

because teachers are going back to work

19:07

but wait a minute government this is the

19:10

household report not the establishment

19:12

report household is they call workers

19:14

hey you got a job cool payrolls means

19:17

they call companies payrolls is the

19:19

establishment one it's a little

19:21

confusing okay that's why I said we're

19:22

going to get new want here if you look

19:23

at the household

19:25

survey the seasonally adjusted read

19:29

right here from August to September

19:31

exploded from 21.4 million to 22.2

19:35

million that is a seasonally adjusted

19:39

785,000

19:41

gain that is unprecedented and it's

19:44

absolutely insane look at this July to

19:47

August you were like - 150 plus 40 this

19:50

is like plus 50 you know like these

19:53

these numbers this this is crazy I don't

19:55

know what the hell happened here with

19:57

the seasonal adjustment number but 7

19:58

85,000 on the seasonally adjusted one so

20:01

you're telling me all the teachers that

20:02

went back to work you adjusted them out

20:04

and you still got 785,000 job gains on

20:08

the household survey which the household

20:09

survey is the one that dictates the

20:11

unemployment report so if you took out

20:12

all of those the unemployment rate

20:14

instead of going down would have gone up

20:15

to like 4 and a

20:17

half%

20:19

what what and on the non-seasonally

20:23

adjusted right here you're up 1.3

20:26

million again that's probably where the

20:28

teachers are the difference between

20:30

those two numbers but this seasonally

20:32

adjusted you still came in with that

20:34

high of a number that changed this

20:35

entire report because when you actually

20:38

look into like restaurant jobs they were

20:39

negative and then seasonally adjusted

20:42

positive even though we know restaurants

20:43

are in the freaking pooper right

20:45

now so you know a lot of people are

20:48

saying okay so you know why like is this

20:51

political is this you know just trying

20:53

to elect KLA

20:55

Harris maybe it's possible absolutely

20:59

possible I I'm I like I don't try to be

21:02

jaded like that I think it could also

21:05

just be that the Bureau of Labor

21:06

Statistics doesn't have all their data

21:08

yet and the adjustments they're making

21:10

aren't that great

21:13

uh uh so that's not

21:16

great and that means we're going to get

21:18

revisions as they continue to get data

21:20

remember this jobs report came out on

21:22

October 4th they're going to keep

21:23

getting data out over the next two or

21:25

three weeks so they can help revise

21:27

September numbers probably going to get

21:29

a big downward revision here because

21:30

this is crazy this was like a 3.7 Sigma

21:33

standard deviation uh above expectations

21:36

read this is it's

21:39

insane uh so okay so where what do you

21:42

need going forward so going forward you

21:44

really need to add like 1.5 million jobs

21:47

in October November December can it

21:49

happen and would that make Kevin bullish

21:51

yes it can happen in q1 of 2023 we

21:54

actually added 1,500 1.5 million jobs so

21:58

yes one quarter can change everything we

22:00

could literally have a really good

22:02

October November December and confirm

22:04

the soft Landing that would be thrust

22:07

like what we're talking about with the

22:08

plane thrust if you get three quarters

22:10

in a row now of not this crazy

22:12

government jobs boost but like actual

22:15

like growth in

22:17

jobs soft Landing stuck hats off bare

22:20

thesis

22:21

dead that's what you need so you really

22:24

like it's crazy but you kind of have to

22:26

now wait until like February

22:29

to confirm there's no recession because

22:31

then you get the January jobs data to

22:33

see if there giant layoffs there but

22:35

you'll also have the full Year's data

22:36

which I guess the full Year's data

22:38

you'll have in early uh January but

22:39

anyway so this is crazy if you also look

22:43

at a

22:44

chart of the magnitude of the seasonal

22:48

adjustment versus what you historically

22:51

see this is the chart you get this shows

22:54

you how crazy this September seasonal

22:56

adjustment is the orange here

22:59

is the uh non-seasonally adjusted let's

23:02

take the seasonal adjustment the blue

23:05

okay so just look at the season again

23:07

usually this is adjusted down because of

23:09

all the teachers well why all of a

23:11

sudden is this 785,000

23:13

and in September of

23:15

2022 it was less than 400k in 21 it was

23:19

negative in 2020 it was negative in 2019

23:21

it was less around 300K in 2018 it was

23:23

nominal 2017 nominal 2016 it was like

23:26

100k why all of a sudden this huge

23:28

magnitude and then of course right

23:30

before the election I mean again you

23:31

know again that's that's the Jade I

23:33

really I try to be neutral and not like

23:35

super politically jaded but this is it

23:39

is

23:41

odd so if the economy truly

23:45

is weak and the jobs data is wrong now

23:50

you have a real problem because if the

23:52

jobs data is wrong it means you are

23:54

stall speed and you're losing thrust at

23:57

the same time as you're losing thrust

23:59

and you're at stall speed Jerome Powell

24:01

is kicking up the flaps which basically

24:04

is increasing your drag and so now your

24:07

speed's falling even more so you're

24:10

contributing to the decline with higher

24:12

rates because of what we talked about at

24:14

the end of the at the beginning of the

24:15

video this is crazy so then you look at

24:18

the yield curve we're almost back to

24:20

inversion well GE we're 4.8 basis points

24:23

uninverted

24:25

when is the last time we've actually

24:28

gone from inversion to uninverted by

24:32

about 20 basis points the same we hit

24:34

this like a couple weeks ago where 20

24:36

basis points uninverted to basically

24:38

back to inversion well you did go back

24:40

to inversion in 2006 right before the

24:42

2007 you know end of 2007 uh December of

24:44

07 the recession began um so this has

24:48

historically happened like you can Bob

24:49

around this line usually recessions

24:51

don't actually begin until you're about

24:53

50 to 100 basis points uninverted we

24:55

only got to 20 so again at that stall

24:59

speed we're like yes we can add thrust

25:01

and keep going we can keep this freaking

25:04

plane

25:06

flying but it's tough because add to

25:10

this you know some of the other

25:12

recession indicators housing starts

25:14

versus completions at 1974 lows 1980

25:18

lows you know pre-2 2008 recession lows

25:21

really really bad you know 1995 didn't

25:24

look like this restaurant performance

25:26

index so low it's recessionary a number

25:28

of unemployed people 27 weeks and over

25:31

at you know at least onethird of the way

25:32

into recession ISM Manufacturing

25:35

payrolls were horrible the Challenger

25:37

report for payrolls was absolutely trash

25:39

9 out of 12 fed beige book districts uh

25:42

declining uh the temporary hiring uh

25:46

stretch largest negative stretch of

25:48

readings for temporary hiring waning

25:51

pricing power at companies

25:53

delinquencies I don't know man I don't

25:56

know so my take is that uh on Monday

26:01

we're going to be talking about uh

26:04

Hedges we're going to be talking about

26:06

portfolio

26:07

allocations uh there are a couple ways

26:09

to go here you could either go long

26:10

Equity with Hedges or you could go cash

26:12

with Hedges it sort of depends on on

26:15

your POV but there I think there are

26:17

some really neat things you can do

26:19

especially where certain retracement

26:20

levels sit now we're going to talk about

26:21

that in the course member live stream

26:23

hope you're there use the coupon code

26:24

before Sunday at 11:59 p.m. I got to go

26:26

to my Mastermind I love you all thank

26:28

you so very much for being here we'll

26:29

see you all in the next one and if you

26:30

want to join the next Mastermind these

26:32

are all like millionaire entrepreneurs I

26:34

mean this is this is a really great

26:35

group of people go to meetkevin.com

26:38

Mastermind and uh maybe you can get in

26:40

on the next one thanks so much goodbye

26:41

and good luck do not advertise these

26:43

things that you told us here I feel like

26:44

nobody else knows about this we'll we'll

26:46

try a little advertising and see how it

26:48

Go congratulations man you have done so

26:49

much people love you people look up to

26:51

you Kevin PA there financial analyst and

26:54

YouTuber meet Kevin always great to get

26:56

your

26:57

take even though I'm a licensed

26:59

financial adviser licensed real estate

27:00

broker and becoming a stock broker this

27:01

video is not personalized advice for you

27:03

it is not tax legal or otherwise

27:05

personalized advice tailor to you this

27:06

video provides generalized perspective

27:08

information and commentary any

27:09

thirdparty content I show shall not be

27:11

deemed endorsed by me this video is not

27:13

and shall never be deemed reasonably

27:15

sufficient information for the purposes

27:16

of evaluating a security or investment

27:18

decision any links or promoted products

27:20

are either paid affiliations or products

27:21

or Services we may benefit from I also

27:23

personally operate an actively managed

27:25

ETF I may personally hold or otherwise

27:27

hold la or short positions in various

27:29

Securities potentially including those

27:31

mentioned in this video however I have

27:33

no relationship to any issuer other than

27:34

house act nor am I presently acting as a

27:36

market maker make sure if you're

27:38

considering investing in house Haack to

27:39

always read the PPM at house.com

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.