Pentagon JUST Said Trump's Strikes FAILED vs Iran.

The Defense Intelligence Agency says

that Donald Trump's strikes may not have

worked. He calls this news fake news

reported by Even More fake news. In this

video, I'm going to show you why it's

possible

Trump's strikes did not work. Note, this

is not to take a political side, and

we'll still talk about the resolution

with Iran. The battle damage that was

that resulted from those US military

strikes on these three Iranian nuclear

facilities over the weekend. And as you

said, it was produced by the Defense

Intelligence Agency, which is the

Pentagon's intelligence arm. And it is

worth noting that it is a very early

assessment. The strikes were only a

matter of days ago, and the intelligence

community is still gathering

intelligence. They are still working to

come up with a full comprehensive

picture of what exactly happened here.

Based on a battle damage assessment that

was carried out by US Central Command,

essentially looking at the images and

looking at what was actually damaged,

the Defense Intelligence Agency has

assessed that the core components of

Iran's nuclear program uh are largely

intact and that Iran's nuclear program

has essentially only been set back by

months. Now, first let's understand a

few things that we know about the

facility. We know that the facility is

buried about 80 ft deep. uh sorry 80 m

deep which works out to about 200 ft

deep. That's quite a bit. We also know

roughly where the facility uh is in

terms of its underground layouts likely

because of previous satellite images

when these facilities were built. We had

some of these air vents that were

assembled and built and you could see

via the concrete exactly where different

components of the structures were. So,

historical satellite images plus

potentially on the ground espionage

could help us with uh targeting our our

strikes here on these various different

facility uh facilities throughout Iran,

including Espahan, which is where we

believe the uh 15 different canisters of

highlyenriched uranium might be stored.

the Natans nuclear enrichment facility

which has a re very relatively lowlevel

underground uh facility and then you've

got the Ford deep underground nuclear

enrichment facility. Now uh NASA did

capture uh fire or sort of heat

signatures in Iran when the Ford nuclear

facility was struck and you see that in

that little flicker right here of a

heat. So we know that the area was

struck. We obviously saw the holes after

the fact. We know the area has been hit.

We know that ventilation shafts were the

target. You could see these images here.

Uh you could see holes here from

multiple uh 30,000lb bunker busting

bombs being dropped roughly where uh

these ventilation shafts are. Keeping in

mind that a 30,000lb bomb is really not

a 30,000lb bomb. It's about a 25,000lb

casing sort of thing, shell around a

bullet. And then the actual bomb itself

is about a 5,000 lb munition, which is

still pretty dang significant. And when

we look at the impact points overlaid

here, we believe that these areas right

here were the target uh of the strike.

Now, this looks perfectly aligned. We

see the ventilation shafts. We see the

holes on the surface. We see what looks

like concrete dust on the surface. And

it's reasonable to assume that if we hit

the ventilation shaft, the bomb would

drop directly to this level and explode.

The problem unfortunately with bunker

busting bombs is the level or should I

say the third third dimension of

dropping a bomb. You know, when we

strike something in Esvahan like some

kind of building, we know where it is.

We can see with satellite imagery that

we've targeted it and all we really have

to achieve is this twodimensional strike

point, right? We really only need to hit

uh the the uh in this case the xaxis uh

and the you know we'll call it in this

case the y-axis we'll say is over there

that 2D x and y coordinate. That's all

we have to hit. the problem. You don't

really care about the third dimension,

your Z-axis, because you know what's the

building? 10 feet tall, 20 feet tall.

Who cares? You're gonna strike it. It's

going to hit and it's going to blow and

the whole thing's going to be gone. Very

easy. Okay. Well, the problem with

something like an 80 meter bunker

busting bomb is that even if you know

that the enrichment tunnel uh is

connected, you know, let's say you have

your ventilation shaft over here and

then you've got uh well, let's draw it

sort of like this way as if it's a

cross-section because this is our, you

know, tunnel down here. Okay, even if we

know these are the ventilation shafts

right here and then you've got this sort

of perpendicular hallway where the

centrifuges are. I'll just put C for

centrifuge. You still need that 30,000

lb bomb to actually get down. And if you

detonate here or here or here or here or

here or even here, the odds of you

actually damaging the area that you're

trying to target here with a blast is

low. Yes, you are going to cause damage

to the ventilation shaft, but did you

actually destroy that centrifugal

equipment? What CNN is suggesting is

that they have a leaked Directorate of

National Intelligence report that

suggests we only did minimal damage to

this facility. Now, at CNN, they their

goal, of course, because it's it's good

viewership for their viewers, is to make

Trump look bad. And when you look at

Fox, their goal is to make Trump look

good because Trump likes hiring people

from Fox News. Fox gets a lot of views

from people who want to hear good things

about far about Trump. And uh CNN gets a

lot of views from people who want to

hear bad things about Donald Trump. So

this makes sense. Keeping in mind though

this little graphic we're drawing here.

When you explode one of these bunker

busting bombs, which is really a 5,000lb

bomb in rock and you miss

probably by a radius of about 10 meters.

So call it about a 30 foot radius here.

your damage to the actual structure will

be very very little. And that's I think

why we dropped as many bunker busting

bombs as we did. Six holes reportedly up

to 14 bombs. Some of them dropped into

the same holes likely to try to hit

various different depths because it

wasn't really a matter of hitting the

shaft. It was a matter of hitting the

depth that Z-axis. And it is possible

that we failed. This alleged assessment

is flatout wrong and was classified as

top secret, but was still leaked to CNN

by an anonymous low-level loser in the

intelligence community. The leaking of

this alleged assessment is a clear

attempt to demean President Trump and

discredit the brave fighter pilots who

conducted a perfectly executed mission

to obliterate Iran's nuclear program.

Everyone knows what happens when you

drop 14 30,000lb bombs perfectly on

their targets. Total obliteration. Now,

our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's

ability to create nuclear weapons. Our

massive bombs hit exactly the right spot

at each target and worked perfectly. The

impact of those bombs is buried under a

mountain of rubble in Iran. So, anyone

who says the bombs were not devastating

uh uh is just trying to undermine the

president and the successful mission.

Now, our sources did emphasize here that

there was uh severe damage that was done

largely to the above ground structures

at these nuclear sites. Uh and so there

was damage done of course by these

massive bombs. But the core components

of the nuclear program we are told they

are largely intact and it only set the

program back by a matter of months. Now

the question that really matters is does

it matter if we devastated these

centrifugal hallways or not? Iran right

now is in a position where they're

arguing, at least some politicians in

Iran are arguing, we will never allow

weapons inspectors or IAEA inspectors

into Iran again. This would be really

bad. What you really need is you need uh

a uh new JCPOA. It's not going to be

called that. We've talked about that

before, but you need a new JCPOA, Joint

Comprehensive Plan of Action. We'll call

it 2.0. Uh we'll call it the uh uh the

MAGA Peace Plan. Okay? guarantee. It has

to include IAEA inspections. And in this

case, it doesn't really matter if the

site's damaged or not because

inspections are going to be looking and

keeping track of uh the canisters of

highly uh enriched

uranium. Uh there we go. Just AI tab

that. That's kind of nice. Uh that's

what we're looking for. But we're also

looking for that centrifugal equipment

which as part of a peace plan we would

expect Iran to go to zero enrichment. Uh

and they really need to probably

outsource their peaceful nuclear program

or uh give up the plutonium

uh remnants

of uh their peaceful program. These are

really going to be components of a JCPOA

2.0 you know, as well as, you know,

reduced uh sanctions,

uh, you know, some form of demand that,

uh, Iran reduced funding for Houthies

and terror groups, obviously, uh, you

know, allowed oil exports,

etc., right? Uh, this this is probably a

rough framework of what you would expect

to be incorporated into a new peace

plan. A ceasefire doesn't do this. you

know, a ceasefire is really just stop

shooting, you know, for for now and then

and then let's talk.

Okay, this is what needs to be talked

about. Now, the real problem with Iran

right now is that Iran has already

rejected

the idea of we will go to zero

enrichment. Now, they rejected that

before US strikes.

And this is where the US strikes could

matter because so far it looks like the

US strikes uh ushered in a ceasefire

for now. If our strikes failed

at Fordo, is it possible the ceasefire

falters and uh this uh this conflict

resumes? Yes, that's possible. But you

really

you do still have a reality where uh it

is possible our strikes failed at Fordo

and the ceasefire holds. That's also a

possibility. And this this is what I

would hope. So my hope is that even if

we we we were not perfect on our FDO

Fordo depth and you know the concrete

dust we saw or whatever was simply

ventilation shaft dust and the

centrifugal hallways are fine.

Presumably they had blast doors between

these hallways as well, right? So keep

that in mind. If you have blast doors uh

you know maybe here, here and here

because they presumed that if they were

ever attacked that they would be

attacked through the ventilation shaft

then what good does that really do you?

Well, potentially not much.

I believe it's possible that even if our

strikes failed, that ceasefire talks

could hold. If they don't, uh then yes,

uh Iran could rush towards

uh uh you know, further uh bomb making

and and this really uh likely results in

a protracted conflict uh in the Middle

East. So my hope is that my hope and

what we're seeing now

is strikes uh succeeding

or failing doesn't matter.

Uh the symbology

is clear. Uh US demands peace

and uh we're willing to drop bombs

until we get it. It's very much the

stick of the carrot and stick, right? So

hopefully it doesn't matter. Now CNN's

probably going to have a field day with

this information that, you know, was

leaked to them or whatever. And we saw

Carolyn Love it, you know, freak out

here or whatever. But again, my hope is

that it doesn't matter. I see some of

your comments you say, you know, why

don't we send like commandos in or, you

know, Seal Team 6 or whatever. Well,

first of all, the facility is probably

buried right now. The exterior of the

facility, these tunnel entrances were

covered uh by uh rocks and dirt uh

purposefully to seal the facility in by

the Iranians in the days leading up to

the bombing. Uh and getting into these

ventilation shafts will be really

difficult. So, how they're getting this

intelligence analysis of how much damage

we did or didn't do, I don't know. you

know, it could be based on, you know,

some surface analysis or who knows,

maybe they've got some kind of deep

sonar that they can use or whatever or

they do have somebody who's been able to

get on the ground and and explore this.

I I don't know. Who knows, right? But I

don't again think it makes a difference.

I think what you really need is to stop

uh the the uh this you know the

hostilities between the two and and just

use this as an opportunity to get back

to talks because whether or not the

facility is destroyed I don't think

matters because the nuclearenriched

material to help make a bomb was removed

from Esphahan before the bombings and if

they could use that to make a weapon

maybe maybe they're already done

enriching and they could make the bomb

that they need and want without these

facilities. I did on the day of these

strikes question and I remember saying

you know Donald Trump's going to tell us

like this was a great and huge success

after we heard that the strikes occurred

and before we heard uh that you know the

press conference that's really

predictable but you always have to take

what Trump says with a little bit of a

grain of salt because everything he does

is a great and huge success. But I do

think there is some clear frustration

with Donald Trump and it's entirely

possible that this facility is not

completely destroyed. In fact, these

centrifugal halls could be entirely

intact still. Uh but again, the hope is

as long as we can monitor and control

the ceasefire, it may not matter because

we symbolically showed we're willing to

get involved. And if we need to drop

more, I don't think Trump will be

opposed to dropping more. The bigger

issue that you end up having is, you

know, Israel, a nuclear power, ends up

dropping a strategic nuke onto a

location. Uh, and and then you really

get the loss of life, and that's when

things go really poopy really fast. So,

uh, that's that's my opinion. Uh, uh,

somebody here says, "You would think it

would have fortified concrete." Yeah, I

mean, that's why you use a 30,000lb bomb

to fly through that kind of stuff,

right? I mean, that's these these are

really heavy. Uh, so let's see here.

Somebody says, "Check out AP news." You

know, it's it'd be useful if you gave me

like on what AP has a lot of news. Let's

see here. Somebody else says, "Think of

Iran as a big whack-a-o in where

mobility is what really matters, meaning

they could pop out of everywhere." Well,

that's to some extent true. We do track

them very closely with satellite

imagery, which does make it a little bit

harder for uh Iran to just build tunnels

anywhere they want and get away with it.

Uh Netanyahu says that Israel bought uh

brought Iran's nuclear program to ruin

here. This is your live blog on AP. Uh

after US air strikes on Iran, Trump told

BB not to expect further offensive

military action. White House officials

said and US strikes on Iran. Trump told

BB not to expect further Okay, we just

read that. They've written that twice

now. Secretary of State makes Iran

related phone call with various foreign

ministers. Okay. Yeah, big deal.

Probably damaged at least. Well, I mean,

yes, certainly the ventilation shaft is

gone. You're going to you're going to

need a new one of those, right?

There's no doubt about that.