Donald Trump JUST U-turned at Davos???
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Donald Trump just addressed the Davos
World economic forum and he changed his
tune on a few things and I wanted to
give you a heads up on these not only
from the point of view of Taxation but
also Russia Ukraine and most importantly
crypto for a lot of folks standing by
for that crypto announcement today and
this is because Senator Lumis suggested
hey stay tuned for a crypto announcement
while Donald Trump did drop the word
crypto and becoming a great crypto
Nation he didn't mention anything
regarding what the crypto nation is
looking for which is that establishment
of a strategic cryptocurrency Reserve
maybe that's going to come in
partnership with El Salvador some folks
are hoping for Donald Trump has said
that the Strategic Bitcoin reserve the
United States has would simply consist
of cryptocurrencies in total that
includes Bitcoin or other
cryptocurrencies that are seized from
criminals and then held however some are
hoping that the United States could go
on as far as purchasing up to $100
billion of Bitcoin over the next four to
five years to contribute to the Bitcoin
currency reserve and we didn't hear
anything about this today uh at least
not yet but we did hear some other
changes the big one to me was the change
in tune that I just heard from Donald
Trump on Russia and Ukraine and this one
I have to say is a little bit of a
letdown Donald Trump suggested that we
need the cost of oil to come down now
you might think wait what does this have
to do with Russia Ukraine that's what I
thought too but it's coming so Donald
Trump starts by lambasting Saudi Arabia
suggesting hey y'all are trying to you
know be cool and invest uh $600 billion
into America over the next years you
know I'm going to ask you to round that
up to a trillion dollars and at first
I'm starting to you know kind of scratch
my head going are are we just like
pulling numbers out of nowhere at this
point because I kind of alluded to this
silliness uh or of these numbers because
I want to see these things turn into
reality on Twitter on a uh with my post
here take a look at this I posted this
yesterday the world has turned into a
pissing contest of who can invest more
money into the United States of America
for Donald Trump first it's a100 billion
by SoftBank then it's $500 billion over
5 years then Saudi Arabia is like oh
yeah well we got $600
billion who's next I wrote yesterday and
In fairness I also wrote hell I'm here
for it this is great for America right
like this is great for the American
worker and the American aot be like I'm
all for it this this is a good thing but
there's also some lunacy that was the
word I was looking for earlier in in
some of where these numbers are coming
from because I'm like wait a minute are
we just like like pulling these out of
thin air or these actually going to turn
into reality so this irony is me going
who's next well who's next is Donald
Trump going back to the $600 billion
doll figure going hey can you get this
up to a trillion dollar I mean it's it's
literally like negotia hey I got these
guys at 600 now you're at five can we
get
youi this feels like a real estate deal
you know hey again all here for it but
wait a minute so what does this have to
do with Russia Ukraine and oil well so
as he's begging the Saudis for more
money he also says hey you know I'm a
little disappointed you didn't do more
to get oil prices down before I became
president and then I'm like oh okay so
their job was to get oil prices down
before you became
president apparently yes so Donald Trump
expressed his frustration that oil
prices were not lower before he became
president and now even though he wants
more oil production oil prices are down
about 1% after his commentary we're
still at 78 bucks on Brent well actually
have is Donald Trump now saying that hey
we need oil prices to come down because
if oil prices came down the Russia
Ukraine war would end
immediately okay that's a really big
change in tune because he's always said
that he would end the war within 24
hours of taking office now obviously a
lot of us thought this was just sort of
hyperbolic that all right like you know
even if he ends the war within a month
it's going to be a good thing and
obviously we're only like 4 days in now
so maybe it's not that big of a deal
right okay fine but wait a second now
all of a sudden the war in Ukraine
between Russia and uh well Ukraine is
not going to end until oil prices come
down so that's a little bit problematic
because a lot of people see this and say
Hey you know is this a uturn on what you
promised us or is this potentially a
realization that negotiating with Putin
isn't going to be as easy as previously
thought now when he was asked about this
he ended up responding with well the war
would have never happened had I been
president but sir you're not you were
not the president when the War Began so
while that is possible it's not the
reality we face today and so now the
question that people have is okay like
are you just going to throw in the towel
on Russia Ukraine because oil prices are
high and you're blaming the Saudis for
that so there's some frustration that I
see people think are going to come from
this now he does go into talking about
how because he's declared a national
Energy emergency he's going to be able
to bypass a lot of energy environmental
reviews that'll make it a lot easier to
build infrastructure projects faster
okay great but wait a minute we have two
problems with that problem number one is
you're going to face a lot of lawsuits
which he's no a foe to lawsuits or
unfamiliar with lawsuits but those
lawsuits and judges could potentially
put a kabash on on how quickly some of
these emergency orders could be used to
bypass environmental regulation because
remember government is all about
balancing the needs of multiple
different people or interests and yes
environmentalists do have a say as well
because they are also taxpayers now I'm
not taking sides here I'm just saying
there are going to be problems on one
hand with that for bringing oil prices
down and number two the Wall Street
Journal isn't actually that optimistic
take a look at this the Wall Street
Journal uh wrote oil and gas compan to
stay put for now this was a couple days
ago they wrote this but it's relevant
now Trump wants oil and gas producers to
drill baby drill but they have adopted a
cautious approach to how they spend
money frackers are more focused on
returning cash to shareholders via
BuyBacks and dividends rather than
reinvesting it in the oil patch Shale
operators known for drill for oil or
also drill for oil overwhelmingly on
private land and opening up more federal
land or for deployment is unlikely to
unleash a drilling frenzy meanwhile
pipeline firms which have run into a
strident opposition from environmental
groups in recent years still have to
navigate a complex regulatory
environment to make sure long-term econ
economics make sense before they
Greenlight multi-billion dollar projects
in other words like even if you clean up
regulation you still have to as a
company decide doesn't make sense to
spend multi-billions of dollars on new
energy infrastructure but when Brent's
at $78 well a lot of people say only
when oil is above $100 in other words
oil companies are really only
incentivized to drill baby drill when
oil is above $100 because the ROI on
these multi-billion dollar projects is
huge if oil plummets because a bunch of
companies are like yeah we're going to
do new oil projects or whatever and the
price of oil plummets to 50 bucks they
actually might cancel those projects
because their Roi could be negative so
like more oil project it's sort of like
damned if you do damned if you don't
right if you don't build oil prices stay
high but if you do build uh oil prices
plummet and you want to like you you
don't want to build more because then
you're just adding to the supply problem
and you're reducing your Roi but if oil
prices are high you wish you had the
infrastructure so you could capture it
so little little bit of a struggle there
every company is going to have to
analyze the regulatory risk and the cost
profile for what they want to do exactly
so this is just a you know those are two
problems here but the reason I bring
those up again now is because those two
problems say all
right does that mean the war in Ukraine
is just not going to end because oil
prices now are going to stay high again
A lot of people are going to go you said
24 hours again let's give him the
benefit of the doubt let's call it 24
days let's call it 24 weeks for goodness
sake but what I just heard from him was
not very optimistic I would have
expected a lot more optimism that yes it
wasn't within 24 hours okay hyperbolic
get it but now it sounds like we're
throwing in the towel on Russia Ukraine
until oil prices come down I'm very
disappointed in that anyway uh then
Donald Trump says that interest rates
need to come down now around the world
he's going to push for that uh to happen
uh he reiterates how he's trying to fix
the border and else uh and all else he
came up with a new demand as well for
NATO he said he wants all countries in
NATO to now contribute 5% of their GDP
towards uh NATO funding up from 2% this
kind of in some part relates to the
Russia Ukraine situation again because
the Russia Ukraine situation is going to
be expensive for longer sort of like
higher for longer costs are higher for
longer and so now it's like everybody
needs to contribute more because we're
going to be a war with Russia Ukraine
for longer it sort of feels like a tcid
admission that this war is going to go
on longer now he does say we'll have
rapid energy approvals again though
that's sort of PR like limited by the
other issues that we just talked about
talks about building new electrical
plants near infrastructure including
clear Clean Coal bringing corporate tax
rates down to 15% if you make your
product in the United States for
corporations and small businesses I like
hearing that in fact in our trumponomics
course we talk specifically about how to
strategize around uh tax benefits uh the
corporate tax rate uh and and a lot more
there's there's so much information in
the Trump anomic course on this but
anyway uh he talks about the one-year
deduction I'm also curious that why he
calls it a one-year deduction it's the
179 accelerated depreciation schedule
but that's okay that's maybe the simpler
phrase to use for a public audience or
whatever the one-ear deduction he says
he wants to bring back and maybe even
you know bring back more of he's
basically talking about more rapid tax
deductions for buying Capital assets
planes Machinery Investments for your
business whatever uh but then he's also
arising this as risking this by saying
well we'll have to work with Democrats
to approve it uh well that's mostly
because if you want to get a Big Bill
done you got to have votes unless you
could use budget reconciliation to get
your big tax plan done budget
reconciliation might be able to squeeze
by uh without that filibuster approve 60
votes so that's why he says we'll have
to work on Dems with Dems to approve it
it's also why he's cozying up to people
like John fedman who's already voted
with uh Trump on uh on some of um the uh
approvals for his cabinet he says we'll
do a deduction for businesses and small
businesses will bring corporate taxes
down to 15% great we'll make demands of
other countries like Canada will tarff
you if you don't you know balance out
more uh with with our trade policies we
don't need your cars Lumber or gas he
says we have enough in America all right
few things here first he says we're
going to terar a you to balance this out
or you could always become a
state okay so he's sort of reiterating
the idea of just become a state within
America this is sort of the the American
imperialism which is interesting fine
but I I want to just add some clarity on
how deficits work deficits matter
because they mean money is flowing out
of the country so when you have a trade
deficit with another country it means
more money is going to the other count
so if we have a trade deficit with China
more money is going to China that means
we have to borrow more which weakens our
currency it also makes us less
competitive and it also means we're less
competitive because obviously money is
going to that country instead of us
which then potentially moves jobs out of
the country and again weakens our
currency it's just sort of a vicious
cycle this is why Donald Trump who who
likes a strong United States wants build
an America because then you have the
reverse jobs come here job Trade Surplus
comes here uh demand comes here stronger
dollar easier to borrow if necessary
more economic stability blah blah blah
blah he talks about how China is
catching up on nuclear and Putin is a
fan of reducing nuclear and how he wants
to reduce nuclear this this has been
talked about for decades it's called
nuclear non-proliferation right the
non-expansion of your nuclear arsenals
this is like frankly just old news uh
but um you know he reiterates uh this
here and I don't think it's a bad thing
to reiterate in the meantime though
China keeps building nukes because they
want to catch up with the Arsenal that
the United States and Russia have you
know I think last count is China has
like hundreds of nukes and uh the United
States and Russia have like five to 6
thousand so China's got some catching up
to do which they are catching up on so
anyway with all that said it's worth
considering some of these changes here
in evaluating what do these mean well uh
oh that's a funny one I'm going to have
to fix that well what it really means is
you're in a situation where you're
starting at the fourth day now of the
Trump Administration to see a little bit
of a roll back on the side of Russia
Ukraine also on oil you're seeing a
little bit of a roll back here and then
on taxes he's already starting to point
at the Democrats going hey well we're
going to need the Democrats so we're
starting to get some asterisks on some
pretty important things that people were
looking for Trump to do and then on the
other side we were expecting this we're
getting that reiteration of we want
rates down we want rates down we want
rates down okay fine but if the economy
keeps booming rates probably won't come
down rapidly now rates will come down
really fast if we go into a recession
but that would take an unemployment
recession that's really a topic for a
different video if you want more insight
on that and what Piper Sandler thinks
regarding bonds and jobs and recession
make sure to watch the video that I
posted this morning I think it's a
pretty uh important video just type into
YouTube uh I'll tell you what the title
is really quickly uh but uh anyway just
subscribe to the channel and then you'll
get all of the videos uh YouTube may not
show all of them to you though so uh
make sure you're subscribed hit that
notification Bell Global recession
unlocked and micro strategy quote
unquote Ponzi check that one out and
you'll see a little bit more detail on
that all right folks thanks so much for
watching we'll see you in the next one
goodbye and good luck why not advertise
these things that you told us here I
feel like nobody else knows about this
well we'll try a little advertising and
see how it goes congratulations man you
have done so much people love you people
look up to you Kevin P there financial
analyst and YouTuber meet Kevin always
great to get your take
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.