TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Worst Economic Warning since 2008 JUST Hit.

43m 46s7,904 words1,127 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

2026 is already starting with a bang.

0:02

The New York Times is talking about a

0:04

collapse in condo prices. The retailer

0:08

Saxs of Fifth Avenue is expected to file

0:10

bankruptcy as they just missed payments

0:12

on $100 million of bonds. Tesla Miss

0:15

Deliveries loses the lead to BYD.

0:19

Meanwhile, every institution on Wall

0:21

Street is really bullish with the most

0:24

bearish institution on Wall Street right

0:27

now neutral on stocks. Yes, the most

0:31

bearish Wall Street institution going

0:33

into 2026 is just neutral. [laughter]

0:36

That's the most bearish read. It's

0:38

crazy. So, let's break down what the

0:41

heck is going on here. Starting with

0:43

probably my most favorite of all time

0:47

leading indicator and then we'll get

0:49

into the details of what's going on with

0:51

condos and real estate and sachs and

0:53

Tesla and AI and there's a whole lot

0:57

going on. So, let's break it down.

0:58

First, we've got to look at the 102

1:00

yield curve. This is probably um I hate

1:03

to say it, but my the thing that makes

1:05

me the most concerned uh just because

1:08

it's historically been a harbinger of

1:12

recession. Uh and you know, we've heard

1:15

this story before, but today is special

1:17

because we're starting the year with it

1:19

rising again. So, you should really

1:21

understand this chart and then I'll also

1:23

show you where buy time is. So the

1:26

orange line is the zero line here, which

1:29

basically means that the yield curve,

1:31

the spread between the 2-year and the

1:33

10ear has gone negative. You don't

1:35

really have to know what that means. You

1:36

just have to know that historically

1:38

every time it goes negative and then

1:41

goes positive, we tend to have a

1:43

recession, including the one I didn't

1:45

chart over here in 82. Okay? Or or even

1:48

over here 80. You actually had a double

1:50

recession right here that I didn't

1:52

chart. And it just reiterates this

1:54

curve. But the point is the point the

1:57

the moment we actually went into a

2:00

realized recession in 1991 in 2008

2:04

over here uh or or you know um the dot

2:09

bubble over here in 2000 uh the COVID

2:12

recession obviously which came very very

2:15

quickly every single time we ended up

2:19

being in a realized recession the spread

2:22

between the twos and the 10ens crossed

2:26

1.25

2:29

after being under zero. And as you could

2:32

see, this is now rising consistently. We

2:35

have consistently been rising in 2025,

2:38

and we are starting out 2026 at the

2:40

highest level we have seen since the

2:42

last recession, which is a little odd.

2:45

We're at 78 to 71 this morning. And

2:49

every single time we cross cost crossed

2:51

125, we've been in a recession. Now

2:54

maybe this time will be different, but

2:57

there is a way to sort of track uh when

3:00

the buying opportunity is. Uh and what

3:03

you could do is you could take the

3:05

difference between treasury bonds and

3:07

high yield. Uh now this is a ratio. So

3:11

it's a little bit more complicated. You

3:13

could jump to Trading View and just do

3:14

II divided by HY. So basically,

3:17

treasuries are safe divided by high

3:19

yield. And when the lower end loses

3:22

value, the line goes up. And so it's a

3:25

way of examining shock. And as we could

3:29

see, we clearly had shock in November of

3:32

2008, your first spike. February of

3:34

2009, that's when the market really

3:37

bottomed out and the Fed bailed

3:39

everything out. And then you had another

3:40

spike over here in March of 2020. And it

3:43

seems like the D by the dip line is over

3:46

1.65.

3:48

So once we panic and you know crap

3:50

basically breaks the the glass floor

3:53

breaks and shock actually happens the

3:56

buy the dip line is about 165 or above

3:59

that you tend to be in buy the dip

4:01

territory. Right now things are very

4:03

calm but that's really because the labor

4:06

market hasn't rolled over yet. Now the

4:09

problem with this is we have a new sort

4:12

of leading tell that came out this

4:14

morning uh and it's the S&P global

4:16

manufacturing PMI and this was a little

4:19

problematic because what we actually see

4:23

right here is the S SNP is saying that

4:26

we are experiencing a wy coyote scenario

4:29

that has developed whereby the cartoon

4:32

character continues to run despite

4:34

chasing the roadrunner off a cliff. In

4:36

other words, they say that factories

4:38

right now are continuing to produce

4:40

goods even though new orders have been

4:43

plummeting. In fact, the gap between the

4:46

growth of production and the drop in

4:47

orders is in the is the widest gap that

4:50

we have seen since the height of the

4:52

global financial crisis back in 2008.

4:56

Payroll numbers will be adversely

4:59

affected if production continues to get

5:01

scaled back. Now, this morning in our

5:04

alpha report, we did a deep dive on

5:05

paychecks and paychecks indicates that

5:08

so far they're still not seeing

5:10

recession indicators and that the labor

5:13

market has been relatively stable

5:14

through 2025. You know, we do deep dive

5:17

fundamental analysis every day in the

5:18

alpha report and the course member live

5:20

streams and then, you know, we put it

5:21

all together. Anyway, the point of this

5:23

is uh they're not seeing that spike in

5:26

layoffs yet. This makes sense. Which

5:28

actually suggests the 55,000 jobs that

5:30

we're forecasting for the labor report

5:32

that comes out next Friday. You know,

5:34

the next week we have a lot of catalyst.

5:36

ADP on Wednesday. I think Thursday we

5:39

get challenger job cuts. Then we get the

5:41

jobs report on Friday. Next Friday, the

5:44

week after that we get CPI. We have a

5:46

lot of catalysts coming up which

5:48

obviously could be problematic and could

5:50

be why we're seeing this bleed in the

5:52

cues. could also be a little bit uh

5:55

indicative that you know when we zoom in

5:58

to this wedge pattern that we're forming

6:00

on the cues over here it probably kind

6:03

of begets on a technical basis that we

6:05

could fall as as you know low as 577

6:09

pretty quickly on the cues that's not

6:12

ideal but it's just sort of a basic

6:14

technical analysis here's that wedge

6:17

pattern zoomed in and we could see that

6:19

this wedge could be get a 577 return on

6:22

the NASDAQ back 100 uh especially in the

6:25

face of of this data potentially coming

6:27

in worse than expected. But so far,

6:30

paychecks doesn't say that's happening

6:32

yet. And the US manufacturing survey

6:36

says it's not happening yet either. In

6:38

fact, they say that employment growth

6:39

was actually sustained into the end of

6:42

2025. So, it's bullish jobs, but we're

6:46

seeing a renewed contraction in the

6:48

order book. And this is that gap, that

6:50

widely coyote moment. In other words,

6:52

things are still going like everything's

6:53

booming, but the foundations are really

6:57

starting to crack. Like the economy is

6:59

sick. It's just a matter of time for us

7:02

to see how sick the economy will

7:04

actually be. And so, we can make this

7:07

conclusion here. We can deduce that if

7:09

new orders stay weak, then obviously

7:11

hiring is going to fall. It's just a

7:14

matter of time for hiring to fall. And

7:16

this is a problem for markets. This

7:18

isn't good. We don't we don't like this

7:20

at all. So, we can actually now combine

7:23

this with what we've got going on in

7:25

other sectors uh like what's going on in

7:29

the condo market or what's going on with

7:31

Sax Fifth or even just luxury goods. Uh

7:35

luxury goods are suffering in the luxury

7:37

market. Uh we are seeing discounts at

7:40

luxury the level I mean to the likes of

7:42

which we haven't seen in in quite a

7:44

while. uh luxury the stat is luxury

7:48

sales are at 15-year lows in terms of

7:51

margins uh which obviously not good.

7:54

Bankruptcies are rising in addition to

7:57

uh sachs of fifth being rumored to now

7:59

go bankrupt. You've got spirit claire's

8:02

uh Delonte foods on the s hospitality

8:07

bankruptcy. None of that is great. Uh on

8:10

top of that, uh we're seeing more

8:12

bankruptcies year-to date through

8:14

November. That's when they cut off these

8:16

numbers. It should go, you know, the

8:18

year's over. We should see it all, but

8:20

we don't right now. So, year to date

8:21

through November, we see the largest

8:23

bankruptcies that we've seen since 2010.

8:27

So, worst levels of bankruptcy since

8:29

2010. 717 through November of 2025.

8:32

That's up from 687 in 2024. Uh

8:36

industrials consumer discretionary is

8:38

most affected. Uh chapter 5 small

8:40

business bankruptcies are up 10% despite

8:42

the ability to qualify for a chapter 5

8:44

bankruptcy being down 40%. And

8:46

individual bankruptcies are also up 8%.

8:49

On top of that, we're seeing sort of

8:50

sort of like capping out on a lot of

8:52

retail stocks which suggests some retail

8:55

or or like exhaustion in in people's

8:59

ability to buy stocks. I mean look at

9:01

Netflix. Netflix is a cash cow machine.

9:04

On a valuation basis, they are 53%

9:09

undervalued, but the technicals are

9:12

horrible. The downtrend has been known

9:14

for weeks, but we actually just broke

9:18

the downtrend to the downside. So, like

9:21

the downtrend is worsening on something

9:23

that is often seen as a safe haven play.

9:27

Now on top of that you're obviously also

9:30

seeing uh you know softness and some

9:32

other retail names whether it's hood or

9:34

sofi popular with retail retailers right

9:36

now chasing things like silver which has

9:38

topped out and currently memories like

9:42

SanDisk and Micron but you know you got

9:45

to know that if you're chasing SanDisk

9:47

and Micron you're chasing the last leg

9:49

of the cycle like Micron and SanDisk

9:53

statistically do well and historically

9:55

do well when you're at that end phase of

9:59

euphoria. Now, of course, Wall Street

10:01

doesn't care. Wall Street is just

10:03

rerationalizing

10:04

how they're calling, you know, what

10:06

they're calling what's going on in the

10:08

market. Now, I always think of this as

10:10

as a problem. Uh so, you know, back in

10:13

the day, we actually called what was

10:15

happening in the market in the dotcom

10:17

bubble irrational exuberance. But now,

10:20

you literally have Wall Street analysts

10:22

saying, "We're not seeing irrational

10:23

exuberance. We're seeing rational

10:27

exuberance is what they're calling it.

10:28

It's actually DWS who said that. The

10:31

problem with this though is when you

10:33

start redefining what was the red flag,

10:36

the last crash cycle as actually a good

10:40

thing, you're basically arguing that, oh

10:43

well, this time's just different. But

10:45

maybe it's not because even in the

10:48

collapse of 2008,

10:50

condos fell substantially faster than

10:53

home prices. This is why at House

10:55

Hacking, I'm a big fan of just single

10:57

families, as much single family as we

10:58

can get our hands on. But uh the New

11:01

York Times is now suggesting that condo

11:02

prices are falling faster due to HOA

11:04

dues rising inflation costs,

11:06

insuranceances, as as well as lower

11:08

desiraability for second homes. But if

11:10

you go to the front page of the New York

11:11

Times right now, they're talking about

11:14

this this sort of condo collapse

11:18

uh and how condos are actually doing a

11:21

lot worse right now in valuations uh

11:24

than uh than what we're seeing. Hold on,

11:26

let's get it here. New York Times condo

11:28

collapse prices falling faster than

11:31

single family. They're actually showing

11:33

that single family uh is up. uh or it

11:37

might be the Wall Street Journal. Uh

11:38

that that might be why I couldn't find

11:39

it on the times. It was the Wall Street

11:41

Journal that had it. But condo owners

11:43

are struggling while single family homes

11:46

are still rising in prices, albeit at a

11:49

slower pace. Single families rising uh

11:52

you know at at a pace that's still

11:54

positive. You've got 4.5% of single

11:57

family homes estimated to be worth less

12:00

than their last sales price. Whereas, if

12:03

you look at condos, 25% of condos in

12:07

nine metros are worth less than their

12:09

last sales price. That's kind of scary.

12:13

And some of that is because of

12:14

demographic changes, people trying to

12:16

move out of urban areas, you know, work

12:17

from home postco, but a lot of it is

12:19

also just the impact of inflation and

12:21

it's harder to get FHA approvals for

12:23

first-time home buyers and condos. You

12:25

know, condos are usually much more

12:27

sensitive to the economic cycle than

12:29

single families are. Now, what's

12:32

interesting is you've got uh Fidelity

12:36

saying that, you know, right now the

12:39

defining theme is still AI, but they

12:42

also mention that there are global

12:45

fragilities. And I think the fragilities

12:47

are really what we're seeing in things

12:49

like the repo market. You know, the repo

12:51

market, the Fed is trying to brand this

12:53

as, oh, don't worry, these spikes keep

12:56

getting larger even though we've turned

12:58

off the vacuum cleaner of money. Uh,

13:01

don't worry. This is all normal. I mean,

13:03

they panicked over here when repo

13:06

started to get it used, the repo

13:07

operation started to get used, they

13:08

panicked. They're like, you know what?

13:10

We're going to turn off the vacuum

13:11

cleaner. Well, even after turning off

13:13

the money vacuum cleaner, the repo

13:14

market is spiking higher than it ever

13:16

has before. Now, maybe this is all

13:18

because of, you know, money leaving

13:20

banks and going to the Treasury General

13:23

account because people are paying their

13:24

taxes and that's why the repo facility

13:27

is getting used. But you know, it's

13:30

either that that's a fair explanation or

13:34

liquidity is truly drying up. Problem

13:36

is, as liquidity dries up, you tend to

13:39

see less money to chase names like

13:42

Netflix or Tesla or whatever. You know,

13:44

one of my calls recently in the alpha

13:46

report uh when Tesla hit 500 was that we

13:49

would be heading back to $433.

13:52

And a lot of people are like, "Oh,

13:53

Kevin, you're just being a Tesla bear.

13:55

Why do you keep saying it's going to go

13:56

back to $433?" And I'm like, this has

13:58

nothing to do with me being a bear or

14:00

bull for Tesla. It has to do with basic

14:02

technical analysis. This sucker is going

14:04

to go back to $433. And since I've made

14:06

the call, we have gone basically

14:08

straight down to $437.

14:12

And I I think we're going to hit

14:14

$433.99. That's a very natural next

14:16

phase line, especially on those Tesla

14:18

delivery numbers that we just got, which

14:20

we can talk more about in just a moment.

14:22

But, you know, I think it's worth also

14:23

remembering that at the same time we're

14:25

getting some of this these liquidity

14:27

constraints. Maybe retail is fully

14:29

allocated, which you know, some

14:30

institutions are starting to recognize

14:32

as well. Maybe people went into the year

14:34

fully allocated. The yield curve is, you

14:36

know, basically uh skyrocketing, which

14:39

is not good. Uh but, you know, when you

14:42

put all of this together, it kind of

14:43

makes sense why you're also seeing Sachs

14:46

of Fifth miss their bond payments, which

14:48

is somewhat scary. We don't like to see

14:52

companies go bankrupt. I mean, in every

14:54

cycle, companies are eventually going to

14:56

go bankrupt. This is normal. Uh and and

14:59

it's kind of healthy for companies to go

15:01

bankrupt, but it's also a red flag. So,

15:03

you know, all of a sudden, the CEO of

15:06

Sachs just stepped down. Pretty sure

15:07

that's front page of the Wall Street

15:09

Journal as well as well. Yeah, there it

15:11

is. SACEO steps down ahead of expected

15:13

bankruptcy filing because the company

15:15

just missed payments on a hundred

15:18

million dollars of loans that are due to

15:21

bond holders and payments were due on

15:23

Tuesday. they miss their payments. And

15:26

people are saying that there's a doom

15:28

loop that's basically happening here

15:29

where when they stop paying their

15:31

vendors on time, their vendors don't

15:33

give them supplies, their revenues go

15:35

down, then they have even less money to

15:37

pay their bonds or their vendors, which

15:38

then leads to even less inventory on the

15:40

shelves. You basically have no choice

15:42

but to get squeezed into bankruptcy.

15:45

Now, at the same time as all of this,

15:48

you know, Donald Trump is cheering that

15:50

everything is fine, but

15:54

the problem with that is everything's

15:56

not fine. And the editorial board, uh,

15:59

you know, made a pretty pretty solid

16:02

slam, I would say, there on Donald Trump

16:05

because they're like, "Hey, uh, you

16:07

know, Donald Trump is retreating yet

16:10

again on tariffs." One of the striking

16:12

contradictions of President Trump's

16:14

tariffs is the way his chorus claims

16:16

their rousing success, even though he

16:18

carves out hundreds of exceptions.

16:21

Rarely has a president worked so hard to

16:23

cover the damage from his policies

16:24

without admitting it. So, Restoration

16:26

Hardware is up like 9% today because

16:28

Trump finally decided to U-turn on 30 to

16:32

50% tariffs on vanities, kitchen

16:35

cabinets, and upholstered furniture,

16:37

leading the editorial board to say, "I

16:39

guess killer love seats aren't as

16:41

dangerous as advertised or vanities or

16:43

whatever." And so, you know, the

16:45

editorial board is like, at what point

16:47

are we just going to keep causing more

16:49

problems because you're like literally

16:51

trying to fix these problems of your

16:53

tariffs by carving out smartphones,

16:56

electronics, farm products, and the way

16:58

you're doing it is by offering 12

17:00

billion bailouts for farmers, stimulus

17:02

checks for certain people. Uh, you know,

17:05

you're you're expecting to offer

17:06

potentially more stimulus checks in

17:08

2026. you know, people in the comment

17:11

section are sort of roasting him for uh

17:13

uh for making it very difficult for

17:15

businesses to operate in this sort of

17:17

uncertain environment. Uh and you know,

17:19

here's a classic comment though, very

17:21

disturbing. Our national security is now

17:23

under grave threat from sinister

17:26

imported bathroom vanities. How could

17:28

Trump back off this important measure

17:30

endangering us all? Endangering us all.

17:33

Obviously, there's a lot of uh

17:35

facitiousness in this. You know, they're

17:37

not meant to be taken literally here. Uh

17:39

but but yeah, I mean it sort of plays to

17:42

the joke of like, hey, like at a time

17:43

where individual bankruptcies are up 8%.

17:46

Uh small business bankruptcies are up

17:48

10% despite the ability to qualify for

17:51

those being reduced 40%. Which is a bad

17:54

sign. People kind of running out of

17:55

money being fully allocated to the stock

17:57

market. It's not a great time to dink

17:59

with the economy even more with the all

18:02

the tariff drama. Although we continue

18:04

to get more exceptions and we probably

18:06

won't hear from the Supreme Court until

18:08

February to like May on tariffs, but I

18:11

think what would be great for the

18:12

economy would be getting rid of tariffs.

18:14

Anyway, that said, people are running

18:16

tight on money and Tesla is no exception

18:18

to this. Uh the information is now

18:21

predicting that uh Tesla should actually

18:24

acquire XAI or that they might end up

18:28

acquiring X AI. Now, I personally think

18:32

that would be a terrible idea, and I've

18:34

maintained this. In fact, I encourage

18:36

people not to vote for Tesla to buy

18:38

shares of XAI because I think Elon Musk

18:41

is kind of running out of money at XAI

18:43

despite, you know, him being desperate

18:45

to build uh or despite him being

18:48

desperate to beat Sam Oldman and having

18:49

a high net worth, most of his net worth

18:51

is in illquid valuations at SpaceX and

18:54

Tesla. Now, if we actually look at the

18:57

financials for Tesla, the financials at

18:59

Tesla on the cash flow statement,

19:01

they're very good. I mean, Tesla has $18

19:03

billion of free cash. You know, $40

19:05

billion of cash minus bills they have to

19:07

pay. So, they've got $18 billion, $18.7

19:09

billion of free cash. They uh have

19:13

generated in the last 9 months about

19:15

$1.3 billion of free cash flow per

19:17

quarter, which works out to about

19:19

300400ish million per quarter. Uh sorry,

19:23

per month. The problem with this is XAI

19:26

is expected to be burning $1 billion per

19:28

month. That's not great because that

19:31

means XAI is burning three times as much

19:33

money as Tesla generates in free cash

19:35

flow. And I actually think Tesla's free

19:37

cash flow will decline. We just had, you

19:40

know, 418,000 deliveries, which is not

19:42

great, not terrible. We don't know how

19:44

many of those went to SpaceX. But, you

19:46

know, like cash is a problem. Tesla has

19:50

$18 billion of free cash, but if XAI

19:52

comes in, they're going to burn this.

19:54

And what I think Tesla should be doing

19:56

is they should be installing more

19:57

superchargers, better superchargers.

19:59

They should be doing more mega packs,

20:01

more mega pack production, more battery

20:03

storage production. They've got high

20:04

margin and 29% gross uh uh uh you know

20:08

uh revenue growth over there. I think

20:09

it's fantastic. They're doing 29% more

20:12

gawatt hour deliveries than they did

20:14

last year. This is a great growth

20:15

vertical at high margins. Uh even though

20:17

they're just repackaging Chinese

20:19

batteries, it's a great business model.

20:21

Uh and they should be focusing on new

20:23

vehicle models. Damn it. I don't think

20:26

that they should acquire XAI, which is a

20:28

cash burning business to compete with

20:31

some egocentric bull crap competition

20:34

between Elon Musk and Sam Alman because

20:36

they hate each other. And I also don't

20:38

think Space X is going to end up

20:39

screwing up their IPO by buying XAI. So

20:42

maybe the information is right, but I

20:44

hope not. I actually think it would be a

20:46

really bad catalyst for Tesla to blow up

20:49

all their free cash flow and destroy the

20:51

core of what makes Tesla Tesla. You

20:53

know, Tesla just burned me on $4,000 of

20:56

credits. I looked on New Year's Eve. I

20:59

wrote a little note down. I'm like,

21:00

"Check my Tesla credits to make sure

21:01

they don't expire." I opened up my Tesla

21:03

credits. I already saw like a,000 of

21:05

them expired, but whatever. I had $3,900

21:08

left. And uh then it said, "Your next

21:11

expiration of $750 of expiring credits

21:13

expires January 18th or something like

21:16

that." And I'm like, "Cool. I got two

21:17

and a half weeks to go spend some

21:19

money." So I was going to buy like the

21:21

Under Arour thing for the Tesla Cybert

21:23

truck. Well, no. On on January 1st, I

21:26

look at it, all my credits are gone.

21:27

They rug pulled all of my credits. They

21:29

just made them disappear. So then I

21:31

asked the little AI chatbot that they

21:33

have in the Tesla app. I'm like, "Hey,

21:35

give me my credits back." And it's like,

21:36

"Oh, email customer support." So, I

21:38

email customer support or service or

21:40

whatever it is at tesla.com. And then I

21:42

get an automatic email. This email is

21:44

not monitored. So, I go back to the

21:46

chatbot. I go, "You gave me an email

21:47

that doesn't work." Meanwhile, when I

21:49

click on the email, their app crashes,

21:50

so I had to manually type it in.

21:52

Whatever. Small issues. Uh, and then the

21:54

AI chatbot is like, "Oh, I'm sorry.

21:56

Here, call the customer service number."

21:58

Like, come on, Tesla. Like why don't you

22:00

guys focus on actually like taking care

22:03

of the people who like have shield your

22:06

business for years and then why don't

22:08

you do what has made you guys good make

22:10

good cars and and not you know chase

22:14

this fad of AI uh it drives me nuts

22:18

because I don't think Tesla like the the

22:20

fad of AI when I mean when I say that

22:22

like large language learning models I

22:24

think that is a fad that is a massive

22:26

fad right now and you don't want to

22:28

throw money on

22:29

at that in my opinion like functional

22:32

AI. I'm a big fan of functional AI like

22:35

full self-driving or like house hack AI.

22:38

Great functional AI but not LLMs. Man,

22:40

don't chase that. Don't blow your money

22:42

on that. That's crazy. But whatever. So,

22:45

uh that's just my little Tesla rant. Uh

22:47

but again, their numbers, not great, not

22:48

terrible. So, what else do we know?

22:50

418,227

22:52

deliveries, year-over-year sales down

22:54

86%.

22:55

BYD is eating their lunch. BYD is up

22:58

7.7% in year-over-year sales, 4.6

23:01

million deliveries, 2.26 million pure

23:04

battery electric vehicles, meaning BYD

23:06

has just surpassed Tesla as the largest,

23:09

you know, EV manufacturer.

23:12

Now, moving away from Tesla for a

23:13

moment, it's worth considering what the

23:15

economist just told us. So, the

23:17

economist just told us, jump into the

23:19

economist over here, the truth about

23:21

affordability. So, are you Hi, hi live

23:25

stream chat. Um but yeah, the truth

23:27

about affordability, the economist makes

23:29

a really good point. They say that

23:31

politicians will naturally do what the

23:32

elect the polls tell them to do. And the

23:35

problem is that you end up introducing

23:37

more harmful policies than you fix. See,

23:40

my opinion is that you should get the

23:41

government out of a lot of things. Like

23:44

you want to fix Minnesota child care

23:46

fraud, stop having the government

23:47

allocate money to the child care. Let

23:49

the free market run the child carees.

23:51

When the free market runs the childare,

23:53

they don't turn away customers. Wow.

23:55

Imagine that. But anyway, so um you know

23:58

if you look over here, the economist

24:01

argues that if you want deflation, what

24:03

you end up causing is a sovereign debt

24:05

crisis like what you saw in Greece, and

24:07

you suffer a depression and deflation.

24:10

So, you know, even though the wealth gap

24:12

is is rising today, people's wages are

24:15

rising more than inflation is rising

24:17

right now. And the best thing to keep

24:18

this economy going is not to tax it uh

24:21

or to create more government programs or

24:24

to send stimulus checks. The best way to

24:26

keep the economy going is to keep the

24:28

government out of the free market and

24:30

not make the mistakes of the 1970s.

24:32

That's at least the take of the

24:34

economist, which I'm actually inclined

24:36

to believe. Now, at the same time,

24:39

you've got the Washington Post dumping

24:40

on Trump because Trump is saying that,

24:42

"Oh, we're creating more jobs for

24:44

US-born workers, gaining a million jobs

24:47

as uh uh gaining more than 2.5 million

24:50

jobs as US born workers gained more jobs

24:52

in 2025 as a million immigrants left the

24:55

workforce. But we know the unemployment

24:58

rate has been rising and unemployment

25:00

data has been getting worse, not

25:02

better." Washington Post and economists

25:04

are pointing that out as well. I mean,

25:05

this isn't a surprise. So, this all gets

25:08

to the bottom line out of all of this.

25:11

The bottom line out of all of this, uh,

25:13

which I'm going to show in just a

25:14

moment, uh, comes right after I show you

25:17

a big thank you. Uh, this is what, uh, I

25:20

saw this morning. A bunch of money

25:22

flowing into House Hack. So, it seems

25:24

like people have money because, you

25:27

know, just the first banking day of the

25:30

year, we're already over 500 like

25:32

$40,000 into the account today. uh for

25:34

people, you know, people's investments

25:37

finalizing for House Act since we closed

25:38

the fund raise, which kind of cool.

25:40

Thank you. I just want to give a big

25:42

thank you to everybody on that. And

25:43

people are loving the real estate AI,

25:45

which is also very cool because we had a

25:47

a really nice comment this morning. Uh

25:49

somebody left, uh boom, two deals found,

25:52

two deals under contract. I've been

25:54

using the AI the last 3 days, liking it

25:55

a lot, looking forward to the updates.

25:57

Yeah, we got a lot of updates coming,

25:59

which we're really excited about. But I

26:01

think the bottom line out of all of this

26:03

is actually this warning that one of

26:04

these economists gives uh and and what

26:07

they say is right over here. Market

26:13

participants aren't necessarily

26:14

cautious. However, they may be fully

26:17

invested going into the new year. And

26:21

that's a little bit of a problem because

26:23

if everybody is fully invested and

26:26

margin debts are at the highest level

26:28

that we've ever seen before, it makes me

26:32

wonder, hey, like how sustainable

26:36

uh is growth for the economy if it's

26:39

predicated on the market holding it up.

26:42

Tesla's going down to 433. But yeah, if

26:44

you look at, you know, the cues, we had

26:46

a rough morning over here. fell off the

26:48

cliff again going down to 607. I

26:51

mentioned that if we lost 617 we'd be

26:53

going down to 607 on the alpha this

26:55

morning and to be cautious uh because

26:58

volumes have been so low and liquidity

27:00

seems to be very very tight. But the

27:03

biggest issue that we face right now is

27:05

that the liquidity concerns and private

27:07

credit end up moving to the stock

27:09

market. Because if the stock market goes

27:11

down, that's the only thing that's

27:13

holding up capex spending, which is the

27:15

only thing holding up hiring or any

27:17

semblance of hiring. And then you have

27:19

problems. Then you have real big

27:22

problems. So I don't want to start the

27:24

year off bearish. Uh, but I have to say,

27:26

I mean, consolidating all of this

27:28

research, I do think I probably have to

27:30

lower my bare bull scale. So, my present

27:34

uh bare bull scale, let's go ahead and

27:37

pop it up. So, my present bear bull

27:39

scale, which which we use this tracker

27:41

because I think it's it's good for

27:43

people to see my bull bear scale has

27:44

been relatively consistent. You know,

27:47

this is my bull bear scale. It's been

27:48

mid mid uh mid uh fives. We jump because

27:52

of ADP weeklys. And I mean, you could

27:54

read it. You could pause and read it all

27:55

here, but we've been relatively

27:57

consistent in the mid fives and I think

27:58

it's a really good tracker. Uh but uh

28:02

but I will actually update this right

28:04

now with you here and we're going to say

28:06

for the start of January I'm actually

28:08

going to go down to a 51. Uh and that's

28:11

because I'm seeing uh tight uh liquidity

28:15

uh the last week might be more than

28:18

seasonal uh slowness if allocations and

28:23

debt are maxed. uh the ability uh you

28:27

know uh stock stock stock exhaustion

28:31

uh will set in uh that will lead to

28:35

forced layoffs

28:37

uh

28:39

as as money becomes even tighter. you

28:43

know, Sachs bankruptcy and missing

28:46

payments on, you know, a hund00 million

28:51

of bonds is just a, you know, another

28:56

early warning sign in addition to all of

28:58

the other bankruptcies that we've been

29:00

seeing. Individual bankruptcies, small

29:01

bankruptcies, big bankruptcies are all

29:03

rising. Uh the yield curve, the yield

29:07

curve steepening

29:09

uh is by far the most concerning

29:13

evidence. Uh as we break 071 on the 102

29:19

and trend towards 125, we are running

29:23

towards recession, not away from it. Uh,

29:27

and so this does sort of reduce me on

29:29

that that bear bull scale, which again

29:32

reiterates why I'm cautious. I'm not,

29:34

you know, I'm not bearish, sell

29:36

everything, short everything, but

29:38

cautious, cautious, cautious, uh, is is

29:40

the name of the game here for Meet

29:43

Kevin. Uh, and and again, I just want to

29:45

be so grateful for all of you because by

29:47

no means do I want to like come across

29:50

as like, oh, hell, look at us. Look at

29:51

the money we have or whatever. I just

29:53

want to prove to you that I put my money

29:54

where my mouth is. And so this is uh

29:57

this is our house hack Mercury. I love

29:59

the app, by the way. Uh if if you've

30:01

never used Mercury for business banking,

30:03

I highly encourage it. I'm pretty sure I

30:05

have an affiliate link for them. Yeah,

30:07

there you go. Banking done right. Go to

30:09

metaven.com/bank

30:11

and then you get like a $200 bonus. I I

30:13

don't know what their affiliate link is.

30:15

There's some kind of bonus if you go

30:16

there, but this is our Mercury. Uh and

30:19

so um you know, so we have uh this is

30:22

our cash balance at Mercury. Uh I think

30:24

in total we're at about 15.5 in cash

30:27

right now and it's mostly money markets

30:30

like the house hack treasury uh or the

30:32

Mercury Treasury account which gives you

30:34

like a 3.7 yield or somewhere between

30:36

3.7 and 4% something like that. Um and

30:40

uh you know we're we're kind of sitting

30:42

on this cash from the fundraising now

30:43

and we're like all right this does

30:45

position us to be quite defensive uh and

30:48

and not only expand our AI uh uh

30:50

offering not expecting AGI right just

30:54

with the AI that exists today providing

30:56

a great quality product and service uh

30:58

but you know we're we're AI profitable

31:00

and my goal is to keep it that way I

31:03

don't want to like turn into a drunk

31:05

sailor like X AI I or open AI and spend

31:10

blindly going into 2026, we're we're

31:13

going to keep the money uh safe and be

31:16

very very conservative. And so I think

31:18

my bare bull scale for all the reasons

31:20

we've just enumerated in this segment uh

31:22

really align with that. Now I understand

31:25

a lot of people look and they say Kevin,

31:28

you know, like isn't there an

31:29

opportunity cost to to you know uh being

31:34

heavily exposed to cash? Of course. And

31:36

don't get me wrong, I mean, we just

31:38

bought 11 properties and and you know,

31:40

we think we got great deals on those

31:42

properties and we think we're really

31:43

insulated on those single family

31:45

purchases that we just made. We think

31:46

all of them were below market value, way

31:49

more than than what we spent to fix them

31:51

up. Uh, you know, knock on wood as we

31:53

finish these out. But, uh, but I'm not

31:57

highly tempted to dive into buying. I

32:00

usually am not in Q1. Usually Q1, Q2, I

32:03

wait, you know, I don't buy. They

32:04

usually only buy in the third and fourth

32:05

quarter. Uh but uh but raising cash and

32:08

diversifying is is I think very very

32:11

smart right now. Somebody here in the

32:13

chat says, "Kevin, why did the market

32:14

tank?" You know, I again I think it's

32:15

just there's an exhaustion. Uh somebody

32:18

says, "Kevin, you nailed 2022. You

32:20

warned everybody on time." Well, thank

32:22

you for saying that. Uh so

32:26

I know we had a little bit of a talk

32:27

about fire sprinklers earlier. We don't

32:29

need to go back into that. Uh so that

32:32

has a ripple effect. Now the bond

32:34

holders at Sachs of Fifth aren't getting

32:35

paid. Does that have a downstream

32:37

effect? Sure. Well, yeah. Like if bond

32:39

holders at Sachs don't get their

32:41

distributions, then then you know they

32:44

have less money to go buy the stock dip

32:46

or whatever, right? I personally think a

32:48

red flag is Netflix cuz if you look at

32:51

the weak chart on Netflix, when you lose

32:53

the downtrend, it really shows that what

32:56

what was used to be deemed safe is no

32:58

longer safe. And again, I think their

33:00

valuation is very low. And I think the

33:02

same of meta, but I'm also like

33:05

cognizant that we could also just be

33:07

going into a bearish a bearish time

33:11

of uh uh of uh for the stock market. So

33:15

I like when when your most bearish

33:18

analyst is neutral on stocks, to me

33:20

that's a contrarian sell signal. Uh

33:23

which which is not great. So uh I I I do

33:26

see that as a uh as a red flag. So we'll

33:29

see. We'll see. Now, I know that, you

33:31

know, Bitcoin had a nice little jump

33:33

over $90,000 today, but you also have to

33:35

be very careful using um Bitcoin right

33:38

now as a uh as a catalyst, mostly

33:41

because

33:43

uh Michael Sailor has typically been

33:46

associated with buying every single week

33:48

and he keeps marking new highs. So, he

33:52

tends to buy and then a few hours later,

33:54

Bitcoin just retraces

33:56

uh and then he's upside down. You know,

33:58

he doesn't buy wedge deals. He does the

34:00

opposite. He pumps the market when he's

34:02

buying and then the market slips out

34:04

from under him. So, he's really buying

34:06

at a negative every single time he's

34:08

buying, which is great. He's he's

34:09

actually creating negative wedge deals.

34:12

He's giving somebody else exit

34:14

liquidity. It's It's really incredible.

34:16

Uh here's a question. Wow, $20 donation.

34:18

Thank you, Mountain46.

34:22

I have a question. So, I open up a hive

34:26

and forging. I don't know what any of

34:27

that means. I buy SpaceX, OpenAI, and so

34:29

on. Do you know if it's legit before I

34:31

put funds into it? I don't know anything

34:33

about Hive or Forge or accounts or

34:35

whatever. Uh I mean, what I've seen a

34:38

lot of companies do is they'll have

34:41

special purpose vehicles where they'll

34:42

get an allocation and then they kind of

34:44

put over they lay over their own fees. I

34:46

just be cautious about buying at some of

34:49

these valuations. Like look, I I I I

34:53

hate using this phrase because I just

34:54

don't define myself as like a venture

34:56

capital guy, but I have a venture

34:57

capital fund. You know, we briefly

34:59

opened that up to reggga uh regggd

35:01

investors. It's not open right now, but

35:03

we invested in Apptronic, which I think

35:05

is like 4xed uh since our investment, I

35:08

don't know, ballpark. I mean, I'm saying

35:10

this on a quick live stream here. And uh

35:13

we invested in SpaceX, which I think is

35:15

also like 3xed or 4xed. I mean, we

35:17

invested like a 300 billion dollar

35:19

valuation and now they're talking about

35:21

$1.5 trillion for an IPO. It's crazy.

35:23

That's like a 5x. I don't know. But

35:25

anyway, um you know, I I wouldn't pay

35:29

those valuations. Uh I think uh I think

35:31

those are very scary valuations, but I

35:34

can't give you personalized advice. I've

35:35

never heard of those companies. Uh just

35:38

watch the fees. You know, the fees get

35:40

really really disgusting. Uh but uh

35:43

yeah, somebody says, "What's a regggd

35:44

investor?"

35:45

>> Fair. I I will explain an additional

35:47

lesson for everybody. So, uh a

35:50

regulation D is is it a form of an

35:52

offering that is only conducted towards

35:55

um uh towards accredited investors. So,

35:58

having like a million dollar plus net

36:00

worth or I think it's over $200,000 of

36:02

income or 250, I can't remember. That's

36:04

different from a qualified investor, uh

36:07

which would be over $5 million of a net

36:09

worth outside of your primary residence.

36:11

And then there is a a regulation A

36:13

offering. Regulation A's are a little

36:15

bit of a pain in the ass. You have to

36:16

have a broker dealer involved. That's

36:18

what we're doing with Houseack. It's

36:19

open to nonacredited investors. Well, we

36:21

just closed it on on the 31st, but uh

36:23

that requires a broker dealer, a lot

36:25

more KYC, a lot more, you know, uh

36:28

review uh limitations in terms of how

36:30

much of your net worth you can invest.

36:32

Uh stricter disclosures and financial

36:35

filings. Uh and then of course we are

36:37

PCAOB audited as well, which is

36:39

extremely rare for a reggga. Um, but

36:42

when you hear those phrases, that's what

36:44

that is. Uh, those are private offerings

36:47

essentially. Um, so, so that's I use

36:51

these words because they're they're so

36:52

used to like I'm so used to talking in

36:55

that lingo, but I have to be careful to

36:57

remember that, you know, not everybody

36:58

has taken all of their FINRA licensing

37:00

tests, right? Uh, so so anyway, thank

37:03

you. Thank you for asking. Uh

37:08

uh [laughter]

37:10

million millions in uh in in Pokemon

37:13

trading cards. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you

37:15

can calculate your net worth however you

37:17

deem fit.

37:19

[laughter]

37:20

Actually, for a reggg A, you calculate

37:21

your own net worth. Ironically, for a

37:23

regggd D, we calculate your net worth.

37:26

Uh [laughter]

37:28

a little different, huh? That seems

37:30

backwards. But anyway, uh somebody says

37:32

Elon doesn't care about cars anymore.

37:34

that's just a side business. That

37:36

actually makes me very disappointed

37:38

because I I you know I I've of the

37:40

mindset that we should have the cyber

37:42

cab. We should be focusing on a box van

37:45

Tesla. We should be focusing on a

37:46

minivan and new models. But if if Tesla

37:49

buys XAI, it could unfortunately, and

37:51

this is hyperbolic, but it could be the

37:54

death of Tesla because uh all of that

37:57

cash that they've built that should be

37:59

utilized for making the core business

38:01

that makes money better, they would end

38:03

up throwing into a money losing business

38:05

and giving up their moat. Uh I'm I'm I'm

38:08

very very very disappointed uh about

38:11

that. So uh I find that very um uh very

38:15

sad. But uh anyway, yeah, I mean, look,

38:18

this is this is my first video of the

38:19

year. I do want to reiterate, I

38:21

appreciate all of you having watched my

38:22

um uh my my last video of last year

38:25

video. Uh I am going to maintain the

38:27

promise of no sponsors for the

38:29

foreseeable future. Uh so the only thing

38:31

that you're going to hear from me will

38:33

be the occasional like, hey, the coupons

38:34

coming out. We don't have a coupon right

38:36

now. The only thing you're going to hear

38:37

from me is the occasional coupon

38:39

expiration, but House Hacks Fundra is

38:41

over. No sponsors. I don't really care

38:45

about affiliate links, you know? I put

38:47

them up mostly because I think sometimes

38:48

there's a big benefit to you. Like I

38:50

don't get any benefit out of the car the

38:52

cash one that I was talking about the

38:53

other day, but but but I know that you

38:55

do if you use the product. So, I'm like,

38:57

I don't care. You know, use anybody's

38:58

link you want. I actually think,

39:00

ironically, my Tesla affiliate link is

39:02

back. I was just looking at that. I went

39:04

to uh met kevin.com/tesla

39:08

and it looks like they opened it back up

39:10

again which is really funny because they

39:12

just rugpulled all of my credits and

39:15

then they opened up my referral link

39:17

again because the referral link was

39:19

Kevin's order is maxed out use somebody

39:21

else's link and I guess my referral code

39:23

is back after they stole all my referral

39:25

credits. So I don't know how how to feel

39:27

about that but I think there's some

39:29

shying going on here. Um,

39:33

what are you going to do? Yeah, it's

39:34

shady. It's 100% shady. I wish I took a

39:36

screenshot of the New Year's Eve, you

39:39

know, where it said it's not going to

39:40

expire until like January 17th or

39:42

whatever. I actually might have an email

39:43

of it. Um, but uh but anyway, yeah.

39:47

What's up, Kevin? I'm painting at work

39:49

and listening, trying to change my

39:50

wealth. Let's go. Hey, man. Keep

39:53

building the skills, build the business.

39:54

Yeah, I was telling somebody the other

39:55

day if I if I was 19 years old, let's

39:58

say, and I didn't have a family, I would

40:00

go to both college to learn machine

40:02

learning and I would work the trades,

40:05

whether that's being an electrician or a

40:07

plumber or whatever, because then I

40:09

hedge AI, but I also get the upside

40:11

hedge. I upside hedge AI by being into

40:15

potentially developer, work from home,

40:17

remote work, right? Which I could do

40:19

outside of my trade skills. But then if

40:22

AI takes over without me, I have my

40:24

trade skills. I actually think that's,

40:26

you know, that's what I would do if I

40:27

were 19. I I think those hard physical

40:30

skills are really valuable. You know,

40:31

being a pilot, electrician, plumber,

40:34

HVAC, framer, you know, whatever. uh but

40:38

but also being cognizant and capable in

40:41

uh and and versed in in artificial

40:44

intelligence uh machine learning

40:46

waitings uh neural nets uh waitings for

40:50

neural nets I think is is is fantastic.

40:53

Uh so um somebody says Elon gutted the

40:57

consumer protection agency so he could

40:58

do stuff like that. Yeah. Big irony

41:00

about that is the consumer financial

41:02

protection agency actually just got

41:04

ruled by the courts. I can't remember if

41:05

it was federal appeals or the Supreme

41:07

Court that they need to be funded. So,

41:09

the CFPB will be back. Uh, which is uh

41:13

which is very interesting. You made a

41:14

video like that a year ago saying the

41:16

same thing about no ads. Yeah. Well, uh,

41:19

actually, if you if you actually listen

41:21

very closely, that video was made in

41:23

2022

41:25

and I said that for the foreseeable

41:26

future we won't have ads. And if you

41:28

actually look for about 2 years, I took

41:30

no sponsors. Yeah. So I made a promise

41:33

and I committed to that for 2 years

41:36

which is certainly more than foreseeable

41:38

future, right? So you know I think I was

41:40

incredibly honest about that. Uh and

41:42

then there was a period where you know

41:44

we had ads again uh over uh I think late

41:47

2024 and and 2025.

41:51

Uh but uh but for for the foreseeable

41:53

future in 2026, we're not going to do

41:55

ads. I don't know how long that's going

41:57

to be, but for a while you you won't see

42:00

sponsors, right? like YouTube's still

42:02

going to put in their ads. But uh you

42:05

know that unfortunately that's always

42:06

the thing that people miss is like I

42:08

could say you know a certain time frame

42:10

and then I could commit to it for years

42:11

but then they only hear what they want

42:13

to hear which is I thought you said no

42:15

ads forever. It's like I never said

42:16

that. Uh but but people forget that. So

42:20

you know fixing people's impressions is

42:22

uh is is uh always challenging but

42:25

that's okay. Somebody says we need a

42:27

watchdog agency for exactly your issue.

42:29

Yeah, I mean I feel scammed, right?

42:31

Somebody says don't sue. Yeah, I'm not

42:32

going to sue Elon. Like, I don't care.

42:34

But I I do feel scammed. Like, you know,

42:36

I have been a Tesla shill since 2017 and

42:39

and I feel like I got rugpulled out of,

42:42

you know, $4,000 of of of credits. And

42:45

uh you know, in fairness, like does it

42:48

really change my life? No, of course

42:50

not. But uh you know I just think that's

42:52

that's like a sign of the business

42:54

having like if you need to rug pull your

42:56

customers like that's not a good look.

42:59

So I'm a little disappointed about that.

43:01

But anyway, uh so we'll see what happens

43:03

with the cues here. Hopefully we can

43:05

stay off of 607 and uh we'll leave it

43:07

there. So thank you all so much for

43:09

being here and watching and uh we'll see

43:10

you in the next one. Goodbye and good

43:12

luck.

43:13

>> Kevin is very talented but I don't know

43:15

it's going to be him but he's a very

43:16

talented

43:17

>> somebody we consider. Kevin is

43:18

fantastic. I think that Kevin's a a

43:21

brilliant guy and I think that we'd we'

43:23

we'd all be very lucky to have him.

43:26

>> You are not prepared.

43:28

>> Why not advertise [music] these things

43:30

that you told us here? I feel like

43:31

nobody else knows about this.

43:32

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

43:34

see how it goes.

43:34

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

43:36

much. People love you. People look up to

43:38

you.

43:38

>> Kevin Praath there, financial analyst

43:40

and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great

43:42

to get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.