The Worst Economic Warning since 2008 JUST Hit.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
2026 is already starting with a bang.
The New York Times is talking about a
collapse in condo prices. The retailer
Saxs of Fifth Avenue is expected to file
bankruptcy as they just missed payments
on $100 million of bonds. Tesla Miss
Deliveries loses the lead to BYD.
Meanwhile, every institution on Wall
Street is really bullish with the most
bearish institution on Wall Street right
now neutral on stocks. Yes, the most
bearish Wall Street institution going
into 2026 is just neutral. [laughter]
That's the most bearish read. It's
crazy. So, let's break down what the
heck is going on here. Starting with
probably my most favorite of all time
leading indicator and then we'll get
into the details of what's going on with
condos and real estate and sachs and
Tesla and AI and there's a whole lot
going on. So, let's break it down.
First, we've got to look at the 102
yield curve. This is probably um I hate
to say it, but my the thing that makes
me the most concerned uh just because
it's historically been a harbinger of
recession. Uh and you know, we've heard
this story before, but today is special
because we're starting the year with it
rising again. So, you should really
understand this chart and then I'll also
show you where buy time is. So the
orange line is the zero line here, which
basically means that the yield curve,
the spread between the 2-year and the
10ear has gone negative. You don't
really have to know what that means. You
just have to know that historically
every time it goes negative and then
goes positive, we tend to have a
recession, including the one I didn't
chart over here in 82. Okay? Or or even
over here 80. You actually had a double
recession right here that I didn't
chart. And it just reiterates this
curve. But the point is the point the
the moment we actually went into a
realized recession in 1991 in 2008
over here uh or or you know um the dot
bubble over here in 2000 uh the COVID
recession obviously which came very very
quickly every single time we ended up
being in a realized recession the spread
between the twos and the 10ens crossed
1.25
after being under zero. And as you could
see, this is now rising consistently. We
have consistently been rising in 2025,
and we are starting out 2026 at the
highest level we have seen since the
last recession, which is a little odd.
We're at 78 to 71 this morning. And
every single time we cross cost crossed
125, we've been in a recession. Now
maybe this time will be different, but
there is a way to sort of track uh when
the buying opportunity is. Uh and what
you could do is you could take the
difference between treasury bonds and
high yield. Uh now this is a ratio. So
it's a little bit more complicated. You
could jump to Trading View and just do
II divided by HY. So basically,
treasuries are safe divided by high
yield. And when the lower end loses
value, the line goes up. And so it's a
way of examining shock. And as we could
see, we clearly had shock in November of
2008, your first spike. February of
2009, that's when the market really
bottomed out and the Fed bailed
everything out. And then you had another
spike over here in March of 2020. And it
seems like the D by the dip line is over
1.65.
So once we panic and you know crap
basically breaks the the glass floor
breaks and shock actually happens the
buy the dip line is about 165 or above
that you tend to be in buy the dip
territory. Right now things are very
calm but that's really because the labor
market hasn't rolled over yet. Now the
problem with this is we have a new sort
of leading tell that came out this
morning uh and it's the S&P global
manufacturing PMI and this was a little
problematic because what we actually see
right here is the S SNP is saying that
we are experiencing a wy coyote scenario
that has developed whereby the cartoon
character continues to run despite
chasing the roadrunner off a cliff. In
other words, they say that factories
right now are continuing to produce
goods even though new orders have been
plummeting. In fact, the gap between the
growth of production and the drop in
orders is in the is the widest gap that
we have seen since the height of the
global financial crisis back in 2008.
Payroll numbers will be adversely
affected if production continues to get
scaled back. Now, this morning in our
alpha report, we did a deep dive on
paychecks and paychecks indicates that
so far they're still not seeing
recession indicators and that the labor
market has been relatively stable
through 2025. You know, we do deep dive
fundamental analysis every day in the
alpha report and the course member live
streams and then, you know, we put it
all together. Anyway, the point of this
is uh they're not seeing that spike in
layoffs yet. This makes sense. Which
actually suggests the 55,000 jobs that
we're forecasting for the labor report
that comes out next Friday. You know,
the next week we have a lot of catalyst.
ADP on Wednesday. I think Thursday we
get challenger job cuts. Then we get the
jobs report on Friday. Next Friday, the
week after that we get CPI. We have a
lot of catalysts coming up which
obviously could be problematic and could
be why we're seeing this bleed in the
cues. could also be a little bit uh
indicative that you know when we zoom in
to this wedge pattern that we're forming
on the cues over here it probably kind
of begets on a technical basis that we
could fall as as you know low as 577
pretty quickly on the cues that's not
ideal but it's just sort of a basic
technical analysis here's that wedge
pattern zoomed in and we could see that
this wedge could be get a 577 return on
the NASDAQ back 100 uh especially in the
face of of this data potentially coming
in worse than expected. But so far,
paychecks doesn't say that's happening
yet. And the US manufacturing survey
says it's not happening yet either. In
fact, they say that employment growth
was actually sustained into the end of
2025. So, it's bullish jobs, but we're
seeing a renewed contraction in the
order book. And this is that gap, that
widely coyote moment. In other words,
things are still going like everything's
booming, but the foundations are really
starting to crack. Like the economy is
sick. It's just a matter of time for us
to see how sick the economy will
actually be. And so, we can make this
conclusion here. We can deduce that if
new orders stay weak, then obviously
hiring is going to fall. It's just a
matter of time for hiring to fall. And
this is a problem for markets. This
isn't good. We don't we don't like this
at all. So, we can actually now combine
this with what we've got going on in
other sectors uh like what's going on in
the condo market or what's going on with
Sax Fifth or even just luxury goods. Uh
luxury goods are suffering in the luxury
market. Uh we are seeing discounts at
luxury the level I mean to the likes of
which we haven't seen in in quite a
while. uh luxury the stat is luxury
sales are at 15-year lows in terms of
margins uh which obviously not good.
Bankruptcies are rising in addition to
uh sachs of fifth being rumored to now
go bankrupt. You've got spirit claire's
uh Delonte foods on the s hospitality
bankruptcy. None of that is great. Uh on
top of that, uh we're seeing more
bankruptcies year-to date through
November. That's when they cut off these
numbers. It should go, you know, the
year's over. We should see it all, but
we don't right now. So, year to date
through November, we see the largest
bankruptcies that we've seen since 2010.
So, worst levels of bankruptcy since
2010. 717 through November of 2025.
That's up from 687 in 2024. Uh
industrials consumer discretionary is
most affected. Uh chapter 5 small
business bankruptcies are up 10% despite
the ability to qualify for a chapter 5
bankruptcy being down 40%. And
individual bankruptcies are also up 8%.
On top of that, we're seeing sort of
sort of like capping out on a lot of
retail stocks which suggests some retail
or or like exhaustion in in people's
ability to buy stocks. I mean look at
Netflix. Netflix is a cash cow machine.
On a valuation basis, they are 53%
undervalued, but the technicals are
horrible. The downtrend has been known
for weeks, but we actually just broke
the downtrend to the downside. So, like
the downtrend is worsening on something
that is often seen as a safe haven play.
Now on top of that you're obviously also
seeing uh you know softness and some
other retail names whether it's hood or
sofi popular with retail retailers right
now chasing things like silver which has
topped out and currently memories like
SanDisk and Micron but you know you got
to know that if you're chasing SanDisk
and Micron you're chasing the last leg
of the cycle like Micron and SanDisk
statistically do well and historically
do well when you're at that end phase of
euphoria. Now, of course, Wall Street
doesn't care. Wall Street is just
rerationalizing
how they're calling, you know, what
they're calling what's going on in the
market. Now, I always think of this as
as a problem. Uh so, you know, back in
the day, we actually called what was
happening in the market in the dotcom
bubble irrational exuberance. But now,
you literally have Wall Street analysts
saying, "We're not seeing irrational
exuberance. We're seeing rational
exuberance is what they're calling it.
It's actually DWS who said that. The
problem with this though is when you
start redefining what was the red flag,
the last crash cycle as actually a good
thing, you're basically arguing that, oh
well, this time's just different. But
maybe it's not because even in the
collapse of 2008,
condos fell substantially faster than
home prices. This is why at House
Hacking, I'm a big fan of just single
families, as much single family as we
can get our hands on. But uh the New
York Times is now suggesting that condo
prices are falling faster due to HOA
dues rising inflation costs,
insuranceances, as as well as lower
desiraability for second homes. But if
you go to the front page of the New York
Times right now, they're talking about
this this sort of condo collapse
uh and how condos are actually doing a
lot worse right now in valuations uh
than uh than what we're seeing. Hold on,
let's get it here. New York Times condo
collapse prices falling faster than
single family. They're actually showing
that single family uh is up. uh or it
might be the Wall Street Journal. Uh
that that might be why I couldn't find
it on the times. It was the Wall Street
Journal that had it. But condo owners
are struggling while single family homes
are still rising in prices, albeit at a
slower pace. Single families rising uh
you know at at a pace that's still
positive. You've got 4.5% of single
family homes estimated to be worth less
than their last sales price. Whereas, if
you look at condos, 25% of condos in
nine metros are worth less than their
last sales price. That's kind of scary.
And some of that is because of
demographic changes, people trying to
move out of urban areas, you know, work
from home postco, but a lot of it is
also just the impact of inflation and
it's harder to get FHA approvals for
first-time home buyers and condos. You
know, condos are usually much more
sensitive to the economic cycle than
single families are. Now, what's
interesting is you've got uh Fidelity
saying that, you know, right now the
defining theme is still AI, but they
also mention that there are global
fragilities. And I think the fragilities
are really what we're seeing in things
like the repo market. You know, the repo
market, the Fed is trying to brand this
as, oh, don't worry, these spikes keep
getting larger even though we've turned
off the vacuum cleaner of money. Uh,
don't worry. This is all normal. I mean,
they panicked over here when repo
started to get it used, the repo
operation started to get used, they
panicked. They're like, you know what?
We're going to turn off the vacuum
cleaner. Well, even after turning off
the money vacuum cleaner, the repo
market is spiking higher than it ever
has before. Now, maybe this is all
because of, you know, money leaving
banks and going to the Treasury General
account because people are paying their
taxes and that's why the repo facility
is getting used. But you know, it's
either that that's a fair explanation or
liquidity is truly drying up. Problem
is, as liquidity dries up, you tend to
see less money to chase names like
Netflix or Tesla or whatever. You know,
one of my calls recently in the alpha
report uh when Tesla hit 500 was that we
would be heading back to $433.
And a lot of people are like, "Oh,
Kevin, you're just being a Tesla bear.
Why do you keep saying it's going to go
back to $433?" And I'm like, this has
nothing to do with me being a bear or
bull for Tesla. It has to do with basic
technical analysis. This sucker is going
to go back to $433. And since I've made
the call, we have gone basically
straight down to $437.
And I I think we're going to hit
$433.99. That's a very natural next
phase line, especially on those Tesla
delivery numbers that we just got, which
we can talk more about in just a moment.
But, you know, I think it's worth also
remembering that at the same time we're
getting some of this these liquidity
constraints. Maybe retail is fully
allocated, which you know, some
institutions are starting to recognize
as well. Maybe people went into the year
fully allocated. The yield curve is, you
know, basically uh skyrocketing, which
is not good. Uh but, you know, when you
put all of this together, it kind of
makes sense why you're also seeing Sachs
of Fifth miss their bond payments, which
is somewhat scary. We don't like to see
companies go bankrupt. I mean, in every
cycle, companies are eventually going to
go bankrupt. This is normal. Uh and and
it's kind of healthy for companies to go
bankrupt, but it's also a red flag. So,
you know, all of a sudden, the CEO of
Sachs just stepped down. Pretty sure
that's front page of the Wall Street
Journal as well as well. Yeah, there it
is. SACEO steps down ahead of expected
bankruptcy filing because the company
just missed payments on a hundred
million dollars of loans that are due to
bond holders and payments were due on
Tuesday. they miss their payments. And
people are saying that there's a doom
loop that's basically happening here
where when they stop paying their
vendors on time, their vendors don't
give them supplies, their revenues go
down, then they have even less money to
pay their bonds or their vendors, which
then leads to even less inventory on the
shelves. You basically have no choice
but to get squeezed into bankruptcy.
Now, at the same time as all of this,
you know, Donald Trump is cheering that
everything is fine, but
the problem with that is everything's
not fine. And the editorial board, uh,
you know, made a pretty pretty solid
slam, I would say, there on Donald Trump
because they're like, "Hey, uh, you
know, Donald Trump is retreating yet
again on tariffs." One of the striking
contradictions of President Trump's
tariffs is the way his chorus claims
their rousing success, even though he
carves out hundreds of exceptions.
Rarely has a president worked so hard to
cover the damage from his policies
without admitting it. So, Restoration
Hardware is up like 9% today because
Trump finally decided to U-turn on 30 to
50% tariffs on vanities, kitchen
cabinets, and upholstered furniture,
leading the editorial board to say, "I
guess killer love seats aren't as
dangerous as advertised or vanities or
whatever." And so, you know, the
editorial board is like, at what point
are we just going to keep causing more
problems because you're like literally
trying to fix these problems of your
tariffs by carving out smartphones,
electronics, farm products, and the way
you're doing it is by offering 12
billion bailouts for farmers, stimulus
checks for certain people. Uh, you know,
you're you're expecting to offer
potentially more stimulus checks in
2026. you know, people in the comment
section are sort of roasting him for uh
uh for making it very difficult for
businesses to operate in this sort of
uncertain environment. Uh and you know,
here's a classic comment though, very
disturbing. Our national security is now
under grave threat from sinister
imported bathroom vanities. How could
Trump back off this important measure
endangering us all? Endangering us all.
Obviously, there's a lot of uh
facitiousness in this. You know, they're
not meant to be taken literally here. Uh
but but yeah, I mean it sort of plays to
the joke of like, hey, like at a time
where individual bankruptcies are up 8%.
Uh small business bankruptcies are up
10% despite the ability to qualify for
those being reduced 40%. Which is a bad
sign. People kind of running out of
money being fully allocated to the stock
market. It's not a great time to dink
with the economy even more with the all
the tariff drama. Although we continue
to get more exceptions and we probably
won't hear from the Supreme Court until
February to like May on tariffs, but I
think what would be great for the
economy would be getting rid of tariffs.
Anyway, that said, people are running
tight on money and Tesla is no exception
to this. Uh the information is now
predicting that uh Tesla should actually
acquire XAI or that they might end up
acquiring X AI. Now, I personally think
that would be a terrible idea, and I've
maintained this. In fact, I encourage
people not to vote for Tesla to buy
shares of XAI because I think Elon Musk
is kind of running out of money at XAI
despite, you know, him being desperate
to build uh or despite him being
desperate to beat Sam Oldman and having
a high net worth, most of his net worth
is in illquid valuations at SpaceX and
Tesla. Now, if we actually look at the
financials for Tesla, the financials at
Tesla on the cash flow statement,
they're very good. I mean, Tesla has $18
billion of free cash. You know, $40
billion of cash minus bills they have to
pay. So, they've got $18 billion, $18.7
billion of free cash. They uh have
generated in the last 9 months about
$1.3 billion of free cash flow per
quarter, which works out to about
300400ish million per quarter. Uh sorry,
per month. The problem with this is XAI
is expected to be burning $1 billion per
month. That's not great because that
means XAI is burning three times as much
money as Tesla generates in free cash
flow. And I actually think Tesla's free
cash flow will decline. We just had, you
know, 418,000 deliveries, which is not
great, not terrible. We don't know how
many of those went to SpaceX. But, you
know, like cash is a problem. Tesla has
$18 billion of free cash, but if XAI
comes in, they're going to burn this.
And what I think Tesla should be doing
is they should be installing more
superchargers, better superchargers.
They should be doing more mega packs,
more mega pack production, more battery
storage production. They've got high
margin and 29% gross uh uh uh you know
uh revenue growth over there. I think
it's fantastic. They're doing 29% more
gawatt hour deliveries than they did
last year. This is a great growth
vertical at high margins. Uh even though
they're just repackaging Chinese
batteries, it's a great business model.
Uh and they should be focusing on new
vehicle models. Damn it. I don't think
that they should acquire XAI, which is a
cash burning business to compete with
some egocentric bull crap competition
between Elon Musk and Sam Alman because
they hate each other. And I also don't
think Space X is going to end up
screwing up their IPO by buying XAI. So
maybe the information is right, but I
hope not. I actually think it would be a
really bad catalyst for Tesla to blow up
all their free cash flow and destroy the
core of what makes Tesla Tesla. You
know, Tesla just burned me on $4,000 of
credits. I looked on New Year's Eve. I
wrote a little note down. I'm like,
"Check my Tesla credits to make sure
they don't expire." I opened up my Tesla
credits. I already saw like a,000 of
them expired, but whatever. I had $3,900
left. And uh then it said, "Your next
expiration of $750 of expiring credits
expires January 18th or something like
that." And I'm like, "Cool. I got two
and a half weeks to go spend some
money." So I was going to buy like the
Under Arour thing for the Tesla Cybert
truck. Well, no. On on January 1st, I
look at it, all my credits are gone.
They rug pulled all of my credits. They
just made them disappear. So then I
asked the little AI chatbot that they
have in the Tesla app. I'm like, "Hey,
give me my credits back." And it's like,
"Oh, email customer support." So, I
email customer support or service or
whatever it is at tesla.com. And then I
get an automatic email. This email is
not monitored. So, I go back to the
chatbot. I go, "You gave me an email
that doesn't work." Meanwhile, when I
click on the email, their app crashes,
so I had to manually type it in.
Whatever. Small issues. Uh, and then the
AI chatbot is like, "Oh, I'm sorry.
Here, call the customer service number."
Like, come on, Tesla. Like why don't you
guys focus on actually like taking care
of the people who like have shield your
business for years and then why don't
you do what has made you guys good make
good cars and and not you know chase
this fad of AI uh it drives me nuts
because I don't think Tesla like the the
fad of AI when I mean when I say that
like large language learning models I
think that is a fad that is a massive
fad right now and you don't want to
throw money on
at that in my opinion like functional
AI. I'm a big fan of functional AI like
full self-driving or like house hack AI.
Great functional AI but not LLMs. Man,
don't chase that. Don't blow your money
on that. That's crazy. But whatever. So,
uh that's just my little Tesla rant. Uh
but again, their numbers, not great, not
terrible. So, what else do we know?
418,227
deliveries, year-over-year sales down
86%.
BYD is eating their lunch. BYD is up
7.7% in year-over-year sales, 4.6
million deliveries, 2.26 million pure
battery electric vehicles, meaning BYD
has just surpassed Tesla as the largest,
you know, EV manufacturer.
Now, moving away from Tesla for a
moment, it's worth considering what the
economist just told us. So, the
economist just told us, jump into the
economist over here, the truth about
affordability. So, are you Hi, hi live
stream chat. Um but yeah, the truth
about affordability, the economist makes
a really good point. They say that
politicians will naturally do what the
elect the polls tell them to do. And the
problem is that you end up introducing
more harmful policies than you fix. See,
my opinion is that you should get the
government out of a lot of things. Like
you want to fix Minnesota child care
fraud, stop having the government
allocate money to the child care. Let
the free market run the child carees.
When the free market runs the childare,
they don't turn away customers. Wow.
Imagine that. But anyway, so um you know
if you look over here, the economist
argues that if you want deflation, what
you end up causing is a sovereign debt
crisis like what you saw in Greece, and
you suffer a depression and deflation.
So, you know, even though the wealth gap
is is rising today, people's wages are
rising more than inflation is rising
right now. And the best thing to keep
this economy going is not to tax it uh
or to create more government programs or
to send stimulus checks. The best way to
keep the economy going is to keep the
government out of the free market and
not make the mistakes of the 1970s.
That's at least the take of the
economist, which I'm actually inclined
to believe. Now, at the same time,
you've got the Washington Post dumping
on Trump because Trump is saying that,
"Oh, we're creating more jobs for
US-born workers, gaining a million jobs
as uh uh gaining more than 2.5 million
jobs as US born workers gained more jobs
in 2025 as a million immigrants left the
workforce. But we know the unemployment
rate has been rising and unemployment
data has been getting worse, not
better." Washington Post and economists
are pointing that out as well. I mean,
this isn't a surprise. So, this all gets
to the bottom line out of all of this.
The bottom line out of all of this, uh,
which I'm going to show in just a
moment, uh, comes right after I show you
a big thank you. Uh, this is what, uh, I
saw this morning. A bunch of money
flowing into House Hack. So, it seems
like people have money because, you
know, just the first banking day of the
year, we're already over 500 like
$40,000 into the account today. uh for
people, you know, people's investments
finalizing for House Act since we closed
the fund raise, which kind of cool.
Thank you. I just want to give a big
thank you to everybody on that. And
people are loving the real estate AI,
which is also very cool because we had a
a really nice comment this morning. Uh
somebody left, uh boom, two deals found,
two deals under contract. I've been
using the AI the last 3 days, liking it
a lot, looking forward to the updates.
Yeah, we got a lot of updates coming,
which we're really excited about. But I
think the bottom line out of all of this
is actually this warning that one of
these economists gives uh and and what
they say is right over here. Market
participants aren't necessarily
cautious. However, they may be fully
invested going into the new year. And
that's a little bit of a problem because
if everybody is fully invested and
margin debts are at the highest level
that we've ever seen before, it makes me
wonder, hey, like how sustainable
uh is growth for the economy if it's
predicated on the market holding it up.
Tesla's going down to 433. But yeah, if
you look at, you know, the cues, we had
a rough morning over here. fell off the
cliff again going down to 607. I
mentioned that if we lost 617 we'd be
going down to 607 on the alpha this
morning and to be cautious uh because
volumes have been so low and liquidity
seems to be very very tight. But the
biggest issue that we face right now is
that the liquidity concerns and private
credit end up moving to the stock
market. Because if the stock market goes
down, that's the only thing that's
holding up capex spending, which is the
only thing holding up hiring or any
semblance of hiring. And then you have
problems. Then you have real big
problems. So I don't want to start the
year off bearish. Uh, but I have to say,
I mean, consolidating all of this
research, I do think I probably have to
lower my bare bull scale. So, my present
uh bare bull scale, let's go ahead and
pop it up. So, my present bear bull
scale, which which we use this tracker
because I think it's it's good for
people to see my bull bear scale has
been relatively consistent. You know,
this is my bull bear scale. It's been
mid mid uh mid uh fives. We jump because
of ADP weeklys. And I mean, you could
read it. You could pause and read it all
here, but we've been relatively
consistent in the mid fives and I think
it's a really good tracker. Uh but uh
but I will actually update this right
now with you here and we're going to say
for the start of January I'm actually
going to go down to a 51. Uh and that's
because I'm seeing uh tight uh liquidity
uh the last week might be more than
seasonal uh slowness if allocations and
debt are maxed. uh the ability uh you
know uh stock stock stock exhaustion
uh will set in uh that will lead to
forced layoffs
uh
as as money becomes even tighter. you
know, Sachs bankruptcy and missing
payments on, you know, a hund00 million
of bonds is just a, you know, another
early warning sign in addition to all of
the other bankruptcies that we've been
seeing. Individual bankruptcies, small
bankruptcies, big bankruptcies are all
rising. Uh the yield curve, the yield
curve steepening
uh is by far the most concerning
evidence. Uh as we break 071 on the 102
and trend towards 125, we are running
towards recession, not away from it. Uh,
and so this does sort of reduce me on
that that bear bull scale, which again
reiterates why I'm cautious. I'm not,
you know, I'm not bearish, sell
everything, short everything, but
cautious, cautious, cautious, uh, is is
the name of the game here for Meet
Kevin. Uh, and and again, I just want to
be so grateful for all of you because by
no means do I want to like come across
as like, oh, hell, look at us. Look at
the money we have or whatever. I just
want to prove to you that I put my money
where my mouth is. And so this is uh
this is our house hack Mercury. I love
the app, by the way. Uh if if you've
never used Mercury for business banking,
I highly encourage it. I'm pretty sure I
have an affiliate link for them. Yeah,
there you go. Banking done right. Go to
metaven.com/bank
and then you get like a $200 bonus. I I
don't know what their affiliate link is.
There's some kind of bonus if you go
there, but this is our Mercury. Uh and
so um you know, so we have uh this is
our cash balance at Mercury. Uh I think
in total we're at about 15.5 in cash
right now and it's mostly money markets
like the house hack treasury uh or the
Mercury Treasury account which gives you
like a 3.7 yield or somewhere between
3.7 and 4% something like that. Um and
uh you know we're we're kind of sitting
on this cash from the fundraising now
and we're like all right this does
position us to be quite defensive uh and
and not only expand our AI uh uh
offering not expecting AGI right just
with the AI that exists today providing
a great quality product and service uh
but you know we're we're AI profitable
and my goal is to keep it that way I
don't want to like turn into a drunk
sailor like X AI I or open AI and spend
blindly going into 2026, we're we're
going to keep the money uh safe and be
very very conservative. And so I think
my bare bull scale for all the reasons
we've just enumerated in this segment uh
really align with that. Now I understand
a lot of people look and they say Kevin,
you know, like isn't there an
opportunity cost to to you know uh being
heavily exposed to cash? Of course. And
don't get me wrong, I mean, we just
bought 11 properties and and you know,
we think we got great deals on those
properties and we think we're really
insulated on those single family
purchases that we just made. We think
all of them were below market value, way
more than than what we spent to fix them
up. Uh, you know, knock on wood as we
finish these out. But, uh, but I'm not
highly tempted to dive into buying. I
usually am not in Q1. Usually Q1, Q2, I
wait, you know, I don't buy. They
usually only buy in the third and fourth
quarter. Uh but uh but raising cash and
diversifying is is I think very very
smart right now. Somebody here in the
chat says, "Kevin, why did the market
tank?" You know, I again I think it's
just there's an exhaustion. Uh somebody
says, "Kevin, you nailed 2022. You
warned everybody on time." Well, thank
you for saying that. Uh so
I know we had a little bit of a talk
about fire sprinklers earlier. We don't
need to go back into that. Uh so that
has a ripple effect. Now the bond
holders at Sachs of Fifth aren't getting
paid. Does that have a downstream
effect? Sure. Well, yeah. Like if bond
holders at Sachs don't get their
distributions, then then you know they
have less money to go buy the stock dip
or whatever, right? I personally think a
red flag is Netflix cuz if you look at
the weak chart on Netflix, when you lose
the downtrend, it really shows that what
what was used to be deemed safe is no
longer safe. And again, I think their
valuation is very low. And I think the
same of meta, but I'm also like
cognizant that we could also just be
going into a bearish a bearish time
of uh uh of uh for the stock market. So
I like when when your most bearish
analyst is neutral on stocks, to me
that's a contrarian sell signal. Uh
which which is not great. So uh I I I do
see that as a uh as a red flag. So we'll
see. We'll see. Now, I know that, you
know, Bitcoin had a nice little jump
over $90,000 today, but you also have to
be very careful using um Bitcoin right
now as a uh as a catalyst, mostly
because
uh Michael Sailor has typically been
associated with buying every single week
and he keeps marking new highs. So, he
tends to buy and then a few hours later,
Bitcoin just retraces
uh and then he's upside down. You know,
he doesn't buy wedge deals. He does the
opposite. He pumps the market when he's
buying and then the market slips out
from under him. So, he's really buying
at a negative every single time he's
buying, which is great. He's he's
actually creating negative wedge deals.
He's giving somebody else exit
liquidity. It's It's really incredible.
Uh here's a question. Wow, $20 donation.
Thank you, Mountain46.
I have a question. So, I open up a hive
and forging. I don't know what any of
that means. I buy SpaceX, OpenAI, and so
on. Do you know if it's legit before I
put funds into it? I don't know anything
about Hive or Forge or accounts or
whatever. Uh I mean, what I've seen a
lot of companies do is they'll have
special purpose vehicles where they'll
get an allocation and then they kind of
put over they lay over their own fees. I
just be cautious about buying at some of
these valuations. Like look, I I I I
hate using this phrase because I just
don't define myself as like a venture
capital guy, but I have a venture
capital fund. You know, we briefly
opened that up to reggga uh regggd
investors. It's not open right now, but
we invested in Apptronic, which I think
is like 4xed uh since our investment, I
don't know, ballpark. I mean, I'm saying
this on a quick live stream here. And uh
we invested in SpaceX, which I think is
also like 3xed or 4xed. I mean, we
invested like a 300 billion dollar
valuation and now they're talking about
$1.5 trillion for an IPO. It's crazy.
That's like a 5x. I don't know. But
anyway, um you know, I I wouldn't pay
those valuations. Uh I think uh I think
those are very scary valuations, but I
can't give you personalized advice. I've
never heard of those companies. Uh just
watch the fees. You know, the fees get
really really disgusting. Uh but uh
yeah, somebody says, "What's a regggd
investor?"
>> Fair. I I will explain an additional
lesson for everybody. So, uh a
regulation D is is it a form of an
offering that is only conducted towards
um uh towards accredited investors. So,
having like a million dollar plus net
worth or I think it's over $200,000 of
income or 250, I can't remember. That's
different from a qualified investor, uh
which would be over $5 million of a net
worth outside of your primary residence.
And then there is a a regulation A
offering. Regulation A's are a little
bit of a pain in the ass. You have to
have a broker dealer involved. That's
what we're doing with Houseack. It's
open to nonacredited investors. Well, we
just closed it on on the 31st, but uh
that requires a broker dealer, a lot
more KYC, a lot more, you know, uh
review uh limitations in terms of how
much of your net worth you can invest.
Uh stricter disclosures and financial
filings. Uh and then of course we are
PCAOB audited as well, which is
extremely rare for a reggga. Um, but
when you hear those phrases, that's what
that is. Uh, those are private offerings
essentially. Um, so, so that's I use
these words because they're they're so
used to like I'm so used to talking in
that lingo, but I have to be careful to
remember that, you know, not everybody
has taken all of their FINRA licensing
tests, right? Uh, so so anyway, thank
you. Thank you for asking. Uh
uh [laughter]
million millions in uh in in Pokemon
trading cards. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, you
can calculate your net worth however you
deem fit.
[laughter]
Actually, for a reggg A, you calculate
your own net worth. Ironically, for a
regggd D, we calculate your net worth.
Uh [laughter]
a little different, huh? That seems
backwards. But anyway, uh somebody says
Elon doesn't care about cars anymore.
that's just a side business. That
actually makes me very disappointed
because I I you know I I've of the
mindset that we should have the cyber
cab. We should be focusing on a box van
Tesla. We should be focusing on a
minivan and new models. But if if Tesla
buys XAI, it could unfortunately, and
this is hyperbolic, but it could be the
death of Tesla because uh all of that
cash that they've built that should be
utilized for making the core business
that makes money better, they would end
up throwing into a money losing business
and giving up their moat. Uh I'm I'm I'm
very very very disappointed uh about
that. So uh I find that very um uh very
sad. But uh anyway, yeah, I mean, look,
this is this is my first video of the
year. I do want to reiterate, I
appreciate all of you having watched my
um uh my my last video of last year
video. Uh I am going to maintain the
promise of no sponsors for the
foreseeable future. Uh so the only thing
that you're going to hear from me will
be the occasional like, hey, the coupons
coming out. We don't have a coupon right
now. The only thing you're going to hear
from me is the occasional coupon
expiration, but House Hacks Fundra is
over. No sponsors. I don't really care
about affiliate links, you know? I put
them up mostly because I think sometimes
there's a big benefit to you. Like I
don't get any benefit out of the car the
cash one that I was talking about the
other day, but but but I know that you
do if you use the product. So, I'm like,
I don't care. You know, use anybody's
link you want. I actually think,
ironically, my Tesla affiliate link is
back. I was just looking at that. I went
to uh met kevin.com/tesla
and it looks like they opened it back up
again which is really funny because they
just rugpulled all of my credits and
then they opened up my referral link
again because the referral link was
Kevin's order is maxed out use somebody
else's link and I guess my referral code
is back after they stole all my referral
credits. So I don't know how how to feel
about that but I think there's some
shying going on here. Um,
what are you going to do? Yeah, it's
shady. It's 100% shady. I wish I took a
screenshot of the New Year's Eve, you
know, where it said it's not going to
expire until like January 17th or
whatever. I actually might have an email
of it. Um, but uh but anyway, yeah.
What's up, Kevin? I'm painting at work
and listening, trying to change my
wealth. Let's go. Hey, man. Keep
building the skills, build the business.
Yeah, I was telling somebody the other
day if I if I was 19 years old, let's
say, and I didn't have a family, I would
go to both college to learn machine
learning and I would work the trades,
whether that's being an electrician or a
plumber or whatever, because then I
hedge AI, but I also get the upside
hedge. I upside hedge AI by being into
potentially developer, work from home,
remote work, right? Which I could do
outside of my trade skills. But then if
AI takes over without me, I have my
trade skills. I actually think that's,
you know, that's what I would do if I
were 19. I I think those hard physical
skills are really valuable. You know,
being a pilot, electrician, plumber,
HVAC, framer, you know, whatever. uh but
but also being cognizant and capable in
uh and and versed in in artificial
intelligence uh machine learning
waitings uh neural nets uh waitings for
neural nets I think is is is fantastic.
Uh so um somebody says Elon gutted the
consumer protection agency so he could
do stuff like that. Yeah. Big irony
about that is the consumer financial
protection agency actually just got
ruled by the courts. I can't remember if
it was federal appeals or the Supreme
Court that they need to be funded. So,
the CFPB will be back. Uh, which is uh
which is very interesting. You made a
video like that a year ago saying the
same thing about no ads. Yeah. Well, uh,
actually, if you if you actually listen
very closely, that video was made in
2022
and I said that for the foreseeable
future we won't have ads. And if you
actually look for about 2 years, I took
no sponsors. Yeah. So I made a promise
and I committed to that for 2 years
which is certainly more than foreseeable
future, right? So you know I think I was
incredibly honest about that. Uh and
then there was a period where you know
we had ads again uh over uh I think late
2024 and and 2025.
Uh but uh but for for the foreseeable
future in 2026, we're not going to do
ads. I don't know how long that's going
to be, but for a while you you won't see
sponsors, right? like YouTube's still
going to put in their ads. But uh you
know that unfortunately that's always
the thing that people miss is like I
could say you know a certain time frame
and then I could commit to it for years
but then they only hear what they want
to hear which is I thought you said no
ads forever. It's like I never said
that. Uh but but people forget that. So
you know fixing people's impressions is
uh is is uh always challenging but
that's okay. Somebody says we need a
watchdog agency for exactly your issue.
Yeah, I mean I feel scammed, right?
Somebody says don't sue. Yeah, I'm not
going to sue Elon. Like, I don't care.
But I I do feel scammed. Like, you know,
I have been a Tesla shill since 2017 and
and I feel like I got rugpulled out of,
you know, $4,000 of of of credits. And
uh you know, in fairness, like does it
really change my life? No, of course
not. But uh you know I just think that's
that's like a sign of the business
having like if you need to rug pull your
customers like that's not a good look.
So I'm a little disappointed about that.
But anyway, uh so we'll see what happens
with the cues here. Hopefully we can
stay off of 607 and uh we'll leave it
there. So thank you all so much for
being here and watching and uh we'll see
you in the next one. Goodbye and good
luck.
>> Kevin is very talented but I don't know
it's going to be him but he's a very
talented
>> somebody we consider. Kevin is
fantastic. I think that Kevin's a a
brilliant guy and I think that we'd we'
we'd all be very lucky to have him.
>> You are not prepared.
>> Why not advertise [music] these things
that you told us here? I feel like
nobody else knows about this.
>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and
see how it goes.
>> Congratulations, man. You have done so
much. People love you. People look up to
you.
>> Kevin Praath there, financial analyst
and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great
to get your take.
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.