TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Get Bearish & Defensive | The Coming Stock Market -47%.

22m 20s3,869 words570 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

now we gotta cover what the Bears are

0:02

saying and boy ah bloody Morgan Stanley

0:05

is back with another one or a buddy from

0:07

Morgan Stanley's back with another bear

0:09

piece and I love reading what the Bears

0:11

have to say because even though I am a

0:13

bull at heart and I think the Nike

0:15

Swoosh recovery is real I want to pay

0:18

attention to what the Bears are up to

0:20

because you always got to know what your

0:22

enemies are doing it'd be silly to be

0:25

blind to what your competition is doing

0:26

so what are we gonna do we're gonna look

0:29

at this piece right here Morgan Shenley

0:31

the bond market is questioning the fed's

0:33

Dot Plot basically I'm gonna keep this

0:35

one simple for you so the bond market is

0:38

pricing in Cuts Jerome Powell per Mike

0:41

Wilson Morgan Stanley's analyst who's

0:43

the big bear in the office he probably

0:45

doesn't have many friends in the office

0:46

but who knows anyway he says look the

0:50

fat is really explicit that we're not

0:52

going to cut rates this year why is the

0:54

market cutting in these rates well it's

0:56

probably because the bond market is

0:57

saying the US economy is either going to

0:59

fall into recession or banking stresses

1:02

are far from resolved but he actually

1:04

missed an argument here and I'd like to

1:06

point out where the Bulls could be wrong

1:08

and where the Bears could be wrong but

1:09

he missed an argument here it is

1:11

entirely possible that the market is

1:14

pricing at a massive set of rate cuts by

1:17

the end of this year because a they're

1:19

doing what the FED refuses to do say

1:21

that inflation is going to plummet and

1:24

rates are going to come down as a result

1:25

the FED can't say that because if they

1:28

say that inflation won't plummet so

1:30

they're in the game they're in a

1:31

psychological game whereas the bond

1:33

market is not subject to that

1:35

psychological game they're actually

1:36

putting their money where their mouth is

1:38

they're not using their mouth as a

1:39

psychological tool to get people to stop

1:42

spending money to affect demand in

1:43

markets right the bond market is not

1:46

only saying either we're going to fall

1:48

into recession or banking stresses are

1:50

over it's actually threefold either we

1:52

go into recession

1:54

or banking stresses or inflation is

1:57

about to plummet or a combination of all

1:59

three of these but the third one is

2:01

actually very encouraging because if

2:03

inflation goes away and we could cut

2:06

back to you know a low interest rate

2:08

regime the recession's over people got

2:11

enough money to keep spending look at

2:12

what happened with Lulu yesterday people

2:14

are spending money like they're drunk

2:16

people are still spending money like

2:17

crazy it's absolutely insane now Morgan

2:21

Stanley suggests that you should cut

2:23

from Exxon uh and Simon Property Group

2:26

and instead on their Best Buy list or

2:28

fresh money buy list what is this a

2:30

grocery shopping list that sounds lame

2:31

they should think of a better list than

2:33

that they suggest you add Colgate I had

2:36

to look up what CL was because I'm like

2:37

who buys Colgate uh but anyway Colgate

2:41

and Walmart

2:42

I actually think these and and that's

2:44

because they're positioning defensively

2:46

I bluntly wrote next to that wrong and

2:49

the reason I think that's wrong is

2:50

because these are exactly the kind of

2:51

companies that are going to lose pricing

2:54

power in the environment that we're in

2:56

right now employee costs go up these

2:59

companies disproportionately have a high

3:01

employee costs for the amount of Revenue

3:03

they have compared to uh you know some

3:06

of the high free cash flowing pricing

3:08

power stocks that I like again whether

3:10

it's in busy if I just combined and

3:12

phase and Nvidia and phase Nvidia Taiwan

3:15

semiconductors Tesla Apple those

3:17

companies pricing power Walmart come on

3:20

that stock has done phenomenally over

3:22

the last year because it's a defensive

3:24

play but that's a trade and when the

3:26

fundamentals come through that trade

3:27

will fade away my opinion okay but you

3:29

already know that uh so they of course

3:31

suggest that earnings are going to fall

3:33

going into the recession but listen to

3:35

this he actually says we focused we had

3:37

a macro discussion and we focused the

3:40

session on credit availability which

3:42

credit availability is actually still

3:43

remaining strong uh which is shocking in

3:45

the short term labor market dynamics a

3:48

lot more labor Supply we know that

3:50

earnings guidance slowly going down

3:52

we'll look at the chart in a moment and

3:54

pricing power I love that they talked

3:55

about pricing power and we'll look at

3:57

some of his conclusions on this so what

4:00

did we have over here we're seeing

4:02

another quarter where estimates are

4:03

being lowered that's fine so earnings

4:05

are decelerating now Morgan Stanley's

4:08

Mike Wilson believes that earnings

4:10

markdowns have a lot more to go he

4:13

believes the consensus is that earnings

4:15

are going to basically do this at the S

4:17

P 500 or that this is what the consensus

4:19

estimates are but he actually believes

4:21

we're going to be on much more of this

4:23

downslope so he really thinks earnings

4:25

for S P 500 companies are going to fall

4:27

a lot more than expected or is priced in

4:29

I agree with him just not on all stocks

4:33

pricing power stocks I think Will

4:34

Survive now uh Morgan Stanley's Mike

4:37

Wilson suggests that look when inflation

4:40

happens you can everybody can raise

4:43

pricing you have a lot more operating

4:45

leverage but the problem is when

4:47

inflation goes down you're operating

4:50

leverage in other words how much you're

4:52

able to increase sales above your

4:53

operating expenses Opex like sales and

4:56

gen goes up maybe five percent but

4:58

Revenue goes up 15 positive operating

5:01

leverage but what happens in a

5:03

disinflationary environment well you

5:04

might see revenues decline five percent

5:07

but your operating expenses go up 15

5:10

exactly I actually think that's exactly

5:13

what's going to happen to Staples not

5:15

pricing power stocks now we could

5:17

actually be aligned and that he might be

5:19

thinking look maybe it's the S P 500

5:21

that gets burned

5:22

I agree with that because there are a

5:24

lot of Staples in the s p 500. now uh

5:27

something that I thought was very

5:28

interesting is I purposely wanted to see

5:31

what chat GPT would say about this so we

5:34

ran chat GPT what does inflation do to

5:37

operating leverage and they talk about

5:40

exactly this about how inflation can

5:42

increase operating leverage however it's

5:45

worth noting uh that inflation can also

5:48

infect a company's pricing power which

5:51

could affect operating leverage for

5:52

example if a company has strong pricing

5:54

power and can pass on inflationary

5:56

effects to customers it may be able to

5:59

maintain profit margins the question

6:01

though is do you get pricing power

6:04

solely because of inflation I believe

6:06

the answer is every company gets pricing

6:08

power because of inflation the real

6:10

challenge is which companies maintain

6:12

pricing power when that inflation goes

6:14

away and that's what Mike Wilson is

6:16

warning of so he thinks when that

6:17

inflation goes away the easy pricing

6:20

power all the easy PP goes away way now

6:23

you enter the bear Market where only the

6:26

companies with true pricing power

6:27

survive the recession

6:30

Mike Wilson suggests that Equity risk

6:33

premiums right now are way too low to

6:37

justify being in stocks now I wrote on

6:41

this that yields potentially manipulate

6:43

this and that's because right now the

6:45

risk-free rate is so high because of the

6:48

inflation we're fighting and Mike Wilson

6:50

did only go back to about 2008 here so I

6:54

have a little bit of an asterisk on on

6:56

his bare thesis here and I do also think

7:00

that he has a point though he has this

7:03

point that says it's possible Equity

7:05

investors are simply looking ahead

7:07

towards the next bailout and the next

7:09

stimulus regime he might be right about

7:12

that he might be right that Equity

7:14

markets are looking towards basically

7:16

the FED just to cut to zero and maybe we

7:18

start getting stimulus checks again not

7:20

just for the chips act not just for EVS

7:23

and energy but also potentially expanded

7:25

on employment or otherwise maybe now

7:29

Baron in mind that breadth has been

7:32

exceptionally weak as large cap stocks

7:34

are holding up the averages right now

7:36

basically thinks look if large caps

7:38

start falling it's over because those

7:40

are the only things holding up the S P

7:42

500 right now now he also makes an

7:45

argument here about real estate briefly

7:48

that we do not think that real estate is

7:50

going to suffer the pain that we saw in

7:52

the global financial crisis or the

7:54

Savings and Loan crisis and specifically

7:57

while they'll be they'll still be

7:59

weakness in lending and mortgages

8:02

ultimately we believe that a real estate

8:06

won't suffer with the exception of

8:08

retail as much as it previously had in

8:10

the past however credit cards still

8:13

running hot and in my opinion that

8:15

reiterates that people are on it in

8:18

terms of well spending through this

8:21

recession now my goal was to end this

8:23

but I want to add some more commentary

8:25

before the Bell so we're going to listen

8:27

to the bell and then I want to add some

8:28

more commentary in my thesis on this

8:30

[Applause]

8:32

ever go against Nike because it's a

8:33

great man you Texas but wow these guys

8:36

are well ahead of nights let's get the

8:38

opening belt here CNBC real-time

8:40

exchange at the big board pentagram

8:42

structured Asset Management celebrating

8:44

the recent listing of its first ETF nice

8:47

screen welcome welcome to a green open

8:50

everyone okay so I gotta get to the

8:52

course member live stream but what are

8:54

my opinions on what Morgan Stanley is

8:56

saying here or or specifically Mike

8:58

Wilson he has a point that yes in a

9:02

traditional recession wouldn't it make

9:05

sense to go to Staples especially

9:08

Walmart yes and that's why people have

9:11

gone to Walmart over the last year

9:13

because the idea is that poor people

9:16

stop shopping at Target and fancy places

9:19

they go to Walmart richer people stop

9:22

spending at Target and Whole Foods they

9:24

go to Walmart and that actually has been

9:26

happening he is correct about that but

9:29

in my opinion being correct about that

9:31

is actually looking into hindsight well

9:33

we look at Walmart stock over the last

9:36

year they've done very well they're only

9:39

down

9:40

1.73 over the last year they've done

9:43

extremely well in terms of holding up

9:46

shareholder value the problem is in my

9:49

opinion this is a company that is

9:52

actually looking at pain ahead take a

9:56

look at the following we're going to

9:57

look at their fundies really quick so

9:59

this is the last time I looked at the

10:01

fundamentals on Walmart uh which

10:04

actually this was not the last time this

10:05

is an old one this is from July I want

10:07

to go ahead and pull up a more recent uh

10:09

Fundy on Walmart but we could look at

10:10

this really quickly so we looked at

10:12

gross margin actually still being very

10:15

incredible for Walmart sitting around 23

10:17

percent gross net margins sitting around

10:19

four percent which was fantastic we'll

10:21

get a recent report over here they have

10:23

lots of uh let's see what do we wrote

10:25

over here lots of cost and little cash

10:28

is what I wrote they have a lot of

10:29

payables now that can tend to be very

10:31

normal for a merchandiser and when we

10:34

look at their net cash provided by

10:36

operating activities though they're

10:38

still pumping out somewhere around 9.2

10:40

billion dollars in operating cash at the

10:42

last six months of 2020 or the first six

10:44

months of 2022 when you you take out or

10:47

look at just free cash flow they were

10:48

sitting at about 1.5 billion dollars of

10:51

free cash flow so they got free cash

10:53

flow they've been holding up very good

10:55

defensive stock but we want to look at

10:57

some of their revenues so let's go ahead

10:59

and get their last quarterly report and

11:01

look at that and we'll jump on over to

11:03

the course member livestream so if we go

11:05

on over to their last press release

11:06

we'll get a little bit more of a look

11:08

into Walmart because obviously it's

11:09

moving into Colgate and Walmart for a

11:11

reason a defensive play the idea is that

11:15

eventually if people get rid of all of

11:18

their discretionary spending the one

11:20

place they'll still go is Walmart it's

11:22

not a terrible argument it's a very

11:24

traditional recessionary mindset

11:26

argument the question really becomes how

11:29

deep is the recession going to go are we

11:32

going to be in a situation where we keep

11:35

this recession going so long that you do

11:38

end up killing people buying new iPhones

11:40

or new cars or whatever maybe so

11:44

sales at Walmart year over year up 7.4

11:48

percent membership down three percent

11:50

but you're still up seven point four

11:52

percent in sales which is great but keep

11:54

in mind inflation roughly matches that

11:57

so if you look at a real adjustment of

11:59

revenues we're probably actually about

12:01

flat for Walmart in terms of growth but

12:05

in addition to that you're actually

12:07

negative on operating income look at

12:10

that 5.5 which means if you inflation

12:13

adjusts their operating income they're

12:16

probably negative 13 in operating income

12:19

year over year I personally believe that

12:23

is going to worsen that is going to get

12:25

even more difficult that's my thesis

12:28

again it's very different from Morgan

12:30

Stanley but I believe the following I

12:33

believe that companies that do not have

12:35

pricing power are going to be companies

12:37

like Walmart where basically you're

12:39

keeping up with inflation here

12:42

but your cost of sales are exploding at

12:45

a higher rate and so is your Opex at a

12:48

higher rate than you're able to raise

12:49

revenues because you don't have pricing

12:52

power you're dealing with extremely

12:53

price sensitive customers you're not

12:56

dealing with price sensitive customers

12:57

or as price sensitive customers at Apple

13:00

for example or end phase

13:03

uh and therefore I think their operating

13:05

leverage will go substantially negative

13:08

this is actually exactly what we saw

13:10

with Chachi PT look at this revenues

13:14

what do we have we have revenues up 7.4

13:18

but their operating income is actually

13:20

down 5.5 it's a little bit of an

13:23

oopsy-doopsies and it suggests they have

13:26

negative operating leverage which makes

13:28

sense in a disinflationary time this is

13:30

why I think Mike Wilson is actually

13:32

wrong to go into Staples at this point

13:34

going into Staples would have been a

13:36

great thing January of 2022 in a Nike

13:39

Swoosh style recovery it's a terrible

13:42

thing to go into my opinion now if we

13:44

look at their actual bottom line

13:46

uh let's go to net income per comment

13:49

share uh net income very nice

13:52

percentage-wise increase from last year

13:54

that's because of some of the write

13:55

Downs they took last year and some

13:56

lawsuit losses regarding uh

13:59

Pharmaceuticals that they had to uh take

14:01

some losses on some some lawsuits and

14:04

settlements uh but anyway ignoring that

14:07

let's I really I think it's easier just

14:09

to compare operating income over here

14:10

because this is a little complicated

14:12

because of the comparisons of the

14:13

different quarters uh but in my opinion

14:16

this is not necessarily something that's

14:18

super exciting let me look at their cash

14:20

flow quickly and then let's look at

14:22

Colgate briefly and then we'll jump over

14:24

course member live so they actually had

14:26

a nice free cash flow though I will give

14:28

them that look at that very nice free

14:30

cash flow you had if we subtract these

14:32

two numbers here you've got about a 12

14:34

billion dollar set of free cash flow so

14:37

plenty of cash but declining operating

14:39

leverage again you would expect that

14:41

though so if we go to Colgate investor

14:43

relations let's just see if they have

14:45

positive Opera trading leverage or not

14:47

because that's what our bear here is

14:49

suggesting is that earnings are going to

14:51

plummet all the growth companies haven't

14:53

properly priced in yet all of the pain

14:56

that's to come and basically the S P 500

14:59

is being propped up by companies like

15:01

Microsoft or apple or otherwise and the

15:04

real pain is coming

15:05

okay so let's look at where he's moving

15:07

money too Colgate and Walmart we just

15:10

looked at Walmart let's quickly look at

15:14

uh Colgate and we have their annual

15:17

report right here so this annual report

15:19

is just out from them what we're going

15:21

to do is we're going to jump over to

15:22

there's income statements let's see if

15:25

we can find them here income statements

15:28

while I look for their income statements

15:30

remember uh we've got a paid promotion

15:32

promo motion where you could get life

15:35

insurance in as little as five minutes

15:36

by going to maccabin.com life you can

15:39

actually get 12 free Stocks by going to

15:41

metkevin.com free that's with Weeble

15:44

it's my favorite platform I actually

15:45

just moved all my money out of TD

15:47

Ameritrade and we're moving over to

15:49

Weeble because TD's a pain in the butt

15:51

on mobile uh it's the thinkorswim

15:54

platform is pretty decent but mobile is

15:55

just trash uh and I prefer how Weeble

15:58

transfers over your your sticks and your

16:01

your drawings and your fibonaccis and

16:03

everything I love that uh and then of

16:05

course check out the buy now play later

16:07

options now in the courses on building

16:08

your wealth link down below oh what do

16:09

we have here Colgate all right so

16:12

colgate's revenues let's do this brief

16:14

and then jump over to courses remember

16:16

live stream so Colgate has net sales

16:20

here that have grown

16:22

17967 year over year divided by 17421

16:25

wow only

16:27

3.1 percent growth how do you argue you

16:31

have pricing power with 3.1 percent

16:33

growth you don't holy smokes and their

16:37

costs went up by about 10

16:40

9.5 percent increase in cost of goods

16:43

sold

16:44

so

16:46

you are absolutely experiencing

16:48

inflation at Colgate your cost of goods

16:51

sold are skyrocketing uh and your sales

16:54

are barely growing on a real basis

16:58

an inflation-adjusted basis you're

17:00

massively negative on sales if we look

17:03

at operating profit oh it's negative why

17:07

would you buy this garbage

17:09

uh your your uh uh let's see 28.93

17:13

divided by 3332 your negative

17:18

uh let's write this here negative

17:21

13.1 on operating profit year over year

17:25

why would you do this there's no PP this

17:29

there's literally zero PP like it's not

17:31

even micro PP it's like it's like

17:33

negative PP it's it's an inverted PP

17:36

it's inside out this is problematic uh

17:39

now the crazy thing again is these

17:41

staples have actually held up CL let's

17:44

see how it is CL stock I don't know I

17:46

haven't looked uh but oh look uh let's

17:48

just do year over year yeah that's what

17:50

I'm saying this is stupid look at that

17:52

Colgate negative operating income

17:55

negative operating leverage trash the

17:59

stock is down 1.8 year over year just

18:02

like Walmart why because the Bears the

18:06

weenie baby bears are like

18:08

uh recession

18:11

okay we must move money to defensives

18:14

that's because what happens well because

18:17

you have money managers who pick up

18:19

their phone and their clients are like

18:20

I'm worried about a recession and then

18:23

the money managers are like

18:25

it's okay you're paying me to reallocate

18:29

to defensives

18:31

we have done so are people really going

18:34

to stop buying toothpaste because of a

18:36

recession are people gonna stop buying

18:38

Walmart uh chocolate bars because of a

18:42

recession no of course not don't worry

18:45

we have you defensively positioned

18:47

but in the long term what's gonna happen

18:49

the fundamentals are going to Shone

18:51

through and these people are going to

18:52

get wrecked

18:54

it doesn't make sense it doesn't make

18:56

sense

18:57

so what do we have over here uh let's

18:59

just look at cash flows really quick uh

19:02

cash provided by operations that's

19:04

decent actually 2.5 bill capex over here

19:06

you're at 1.9 bill in free cash flow

19:09

it's very good it's a free cash flowing

19:11

business but it's because they're

19:12

milking an existing business their

19:15

actual operating leverage in their PP is

19:17

negative I wouldn't want to go near it

19:18

like what would you rather have okay

19:21

this is this is your choice right now

19:22

this I I really want you to think about

19:24

this keep in mind this is the same stuff

19:27

that I do with course members in our

19:29

live streams daily which I got to get to

19:31

uh and so if you're not a course member

19:33

you're missing out on this kind of

19:34

perspective all right you pay once you

19:37

get lifetime access all right here's the

19:38

thing would you rather defensives

19:41

which are down one percent year over

19:44

year you know what I'll be generous and

19:46

so I'll say you're you're at a two

19:48

percent discount year over year you have

19:50

negative real revenues you have negative

19:54

operating leverage basically uh you have

19:57

uh negative PP but you do have free cash

20:01

flow a free cash flow is positive that's

20:03

true okay would you rather that

20:06

or do you go over here and you look at

20:09

uh pricing power growth stocks where you

20:13

have a negative 20 year-over-year

20:16

discount you have positive real Revenue

20:19

you have positive operating uh leverage

20:23

in a dis inflationary time as well

20:28

which basically means you have positive

20:30

PP uh and your free cash flow positive

20:33

so what would you rather no discount and

20:37

negative real revenues or discount and

20:40

positive real revenues with operating

20:43

leverage and PP the only reason those

20:45

stocks are doing well right now is

20:47

because it's a trade it's a trade if you

20:50

want to trade it that's fine you can

20:52

play the cyclical trades but if you're

20:54

looking for a long-term portfolio

20:56

building hashtag not personalized

20:59

Financial advice some people get mad

21:00

they're like why do Finance channels

21:02

save this is not Financial but they're

21:04

obviously talking about financial advice

21:06

this could be Financial advice

21:09

but it's not personal financial advice

21:11

there's a big difference I don't know

21:13

what your situation is if you have a

21:15

hundred dollars to your name should you

21:16

go YOLO at all into Tesla that's

21:19

different from somebody who's got 10

21:20

million dollars should you YOLO 100 in

21:22

the test a very different question right

21:24

people get mad about the stupidest

21:26

things mostly because they don't

21:27

understand legal definition but anyway

21:29

which one makes more sense in my opinion

21:34

it should be obvious okay baby

21:39

that's my opinion now with that said I

21:43

gotta take care of my course members so

21:46

I'm gonna hop on over because usually we

21:48

do the bell with them and you got a

21:49

little bit of a special freebie over

21:51

here now we're gonna see and answer all

21:53

the questions they have why is Donald

21:56

Trump a money manager

21:58

it's gonna be huge okay because

22:01

we like PB we want to grab it by the PB

22:05

and we want huge

22:08

baby

22:09

that's what we won baby

22:12

[Music]

22:15

I'm gonna go now

22:16

[Music]

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.