TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Tesla JUST Flipped.

48m 30s8,596 words1,238 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

all right first things we gotta talk at

0:02

Tesla one of the reasons we have to talk

0:04

Tesla on this is because almost every

0:06

institution that attended the Tesla

0:08

event has released their letter on what

0:10

their takeaways are for Tesla that is

0:13

going to be quite interesting to break

0:14

through we're going to look at Barclays

0:17

Goldman Sachs and what some of the other

0:19

institutions are saying in their reports

0:21

to their clients about the Tesla

0:24

investor Day event now I love looking at

0:26

what the institutions are saying because

0:28

it's not clouded or shrouded in that

0:30

sort of retail bull thesis generally

0:34

retail is extremely bullish on Tesla

0:36

it's probably the stock that is held by

0:38

most retail investors and it's one of

0:41

the largest retail held stocks outside

0:43

of index funds like let's say the S P

0:46

500 which boy there are potentially some

0:48

big risks coming to the S P 500 but with

0:51

that said I really want to take a look

0:53

at those institutional reports because

0:55

the institutional mindset in my opinion

0:57

is very very important right now we've

0:58

got plenty of retail capital in Tesla

1:01

but what is that institutional Capital

1:03

actually going to flow back into Tesla

1:05

is it going to be predicated on the

1:06

market or would investor day have any

1:09

kind of changing effect on what

1:11

institutions believe for Tesla we'll

1:13

determine that in this video now I'd

1:16

like to also clarify because there are

1:18

some folks who are making the argument

1:20

that oh Kevin's being too short-term

1:23

minded in terms of being frustrated

1:25

about the Tesla investor Day event and

1:28

I'd like to address that before we

1:29

address what the institutions are saying

1:31

first it's very important to know that

1:34

the vast majority of people who are

1:36

affected by Tesla stock are affected on

1:39

a short-term basis that means employees

1:43

employees being hired employees just

1:46

hired employees who are considering

1:48

working for Tesla in either the

1:50

manufacturing era in the area in the uh

1:54

autonomous driving segment in the AI

1:56

segment and the chips manufacturing or

1:58

designing segment anyone who wants to

2:01

work for Tesla or works for Tesla is

2:04

immediately affected by a decline in the

2:06

share price of Tesla stock therefore

2:08

it's really important for Tesla to do

2:11

everything in their power to make sure

2:13

short-term headwinds do not create too

2:16

much of a downtrend for Tesla stock that

2:19

then becomes self-fulfilling and

2:20

shortable now Elon Musk obviously and

2:23

clearly violated this himself in 2022

2:25

with his 24 billion dollars of stock

2:28

sales that highly outpace the 15 billion

2:30

dollars of retail net purchases that's a

2:33

problem and obviously led to Tesla's

2:35

terrible drop to 100 bucks now that may

2:38

for long-term investors create a

2:40

fantastic buy the dip opportunity but

2:41

what it can do is create a demoralizing

2:44

environment for employees and individual

2:48

investors who are affected by the short

2:50

term so it is in my opinion very

2:53

important that Tesla do whatever they

2:55

can to organize their presentations in

2:58

such a way that they're not actually

3:00

misleading people now don't get me wrong

3:03

we know in the world of a YouTube

3:05

YouTube's one of those places where the

3:07

titles are often dramatic and then we've

3:09

got to actually get through the content

3:10

well in the case of Tesla they did

3:14

exactly what people dislike on YouTube

3:16

in person they provided an investor day

3:20

title but what they really did was

3:22

provide sort of a margin update and an

3:25

update on how we're going to scale and

3:28

at the same time reduce costs in the

3:31

long term with a lack of detail on time

3:33

frames those were a slap in the face to

3:37

investors in the short term because

3:39

without time frames without an organized

3:42

presentation without exact information

3:45

on hey here's how all of this

3:48

coordinates together it's kind of on the

3:50

World to sort of pick up the pieces and

3:52

go okay like that sounds good that

3:54

sounds good okay how can we put this

3:56

together and how does this align with

3:58

projections for time frames or when are

4:00

these actually going to get incorporated

4:02

into future factories and gigafactories

4:04

what what are the expectations we should

4:06

actually start pricing in right without

4:08

that you're not actually creating an

4:10

investor Day presentation you're doing

4:11

more of a hey by the way here's how

4:13

we're looking at innovating in the

4:15

future but we've really got little

4:17

insights in terms of timing or time

4:18

frames for investors and that's why you

4:20

think Elon Musk himself said this isn't

4:23

for investors like shareholders this is

4:25

actually for investors in earth right

4:27

for that sustainable Master Plan Three

4:29

now that's fantastic for a long-term

4:31

investor don't get me wrong I find

4:33

myself to be one of the largest

4:36

long-term focused investors on the

4:38

platform now some people make fun of me

4:40

for that and they say oh really you're

4:42

the flip-flopper guy who've sold stocks

4:44

in 2022 and then rebought later but the

4:47

reality is anyone who looks back at that

4:48

decision and questions that decision is

4:51

living under a rock they are sticking

4:53

their head in the sand like a dumb

4:55

ostrich and is a complete idiot for

4:58

suggesting that I should not have sold

5:00

in early 2022 in January and that's

5:03

exactly what I did and I never bought a

5:06

single stock while suggesting that I

5:10

would sell right that I always thought I

5:13

was going to hold my stocks it wasn't

5:15

until I changed my opinion that I said

5:18

oh I'm not buying anymore I've got a big

5:21

change coming and within 12 hours of me

5:24

selling my stocks the entire world knew

5:27

about that that some people like to try

5:29

to suggest that oh somehow Kevin you

5:31

know didn't tell the world that uh that

5:34

he was selling and he was telling people

5:35

to buy while he was selling that never

5:37

happened it's a complete lie and that's

5:40

what I think is so fantastic about

5:42

YouTube because we can actually document

5:43

all of that timing and the beauty is

5:46

that people who suggest I'm short-term

5:48

focused Miss exactly what I'm actually

5:51

doing that is I'm so long-term focused I

5:55

run an active ETF that has almost a 30

5:57

allocation to Tesla a substantial

6:00

portion of my own personal portfolio is

6:02

invested in Tesla I don't care about the

6:06

short-term fluctuations I'm saying Tesla

6:08

is making a mistake and I'm frustrated

6:10

on the people who are affected by the

6:12

short term nobody could tell me that oh

6:15

Kevin bought a Jet because he's

6:17

short-term focused my jet my plane that

6:21

I personally signed for is a down

6:23

payment on what I believe will be a 10

6:25

to 50 billion dollar company in the

6:27

future the jet is me risking my entire

6:30

net worth and my livelihood today where

6:33

I could retire and never work again

6:34

today for an uncertain future 10 to 15

6:38

years from now

6:40

I can't think of anybody more long-term

6:43

focused than that that's what long-term

6:46

focus is so in response to anybody who

6:49

thinks oh Kevin's a frustrated

6:51

short-term minded retail investor you're

6:54

a complete because if you actually

6:56

look at the actions that I take and you

6:59

see what I describe I don't I I would be

7:02

hard-pressed to find anybody more

7:03

long-term focused than what I do and

7:06

yeah I changed my mind but that's

7:08

because I changed my mind for what is

7:10

going to create the best results in the

7:12

future and I think that's exactly what

7:14

Tesla's actually doing here

7:16

small micro flip-flops and adjustments

7:19

now actually lead to exponentially

7:22

better results in the future

7:24

short-term minded individuals forget

7:27

that small adjustments today expand to

7:30

massive order of magnitude changes in

7:33

the future and I think that's what

7:35

institutions are slowly starting to pick

7:37

up on and that's why we've got to look

7:39

at exactly what the institutions are

7:41

saying and we'll go ahead and start with

7:43

Morgan Stanley when it comes to Tesla

7:44

take a look at this so Morgan Stanley

7:47

essentially in the short term maintains

7:50

their price target of 220 dollars now I

7:52

personally think that's very interesting

7:54

because Morgan Stanley suggests we

7:56

seriously question how the competition

7:58

can keep up with Tesla now I completely

8:01

agree with that but I think it's very

8:04

fascinating that what institutions are

8:07

doing so far and we've just started with

8:09

institutions here is they're making it

8:11

clear that okay how is the competition

8:13

going to keep up but they're not

8:15

actually making any kind of changes to

8:17

their pricing targets now that's likely

8:19

because the outline that we got at

8:21

investor day didn't really connect those

8:24

dots yet at four most investors and it's

8:28

going to be a while before anybody I

8:30

think can really model the changes that

8:32

Tesla is talking about Beyond what's

8:34

already modeled most of Wall Street is

8:37

already modeling this idea that okay

8:40

7 to 10 million Vehicles by 2030 Tesla

8:44

thinks 20 million Vehicles we discount

8:46

that somewhere between 50 to 60 to 70

8:49

percent we get to Seven to uh 10 million

8:52

Vehicles by 2030. at a 50 cost reduction

8:56

fantastic we already get a model too

8:58

right we know that whether the model 2

9:00

is a newer smaller vehicle for the

9:02

Chinese market or whether it's just a

9:04

newly created model 3 branded as a model

9:08

2 that's made with essentially fifty

9:10

percent uh reduced cost but so in other

9:14

words I do think it's very very

9:15

difficult because of the lack of sort of

9:17

coordinated vision from Tesla's

9:19

presentation for folks to realize that

9:21

the small micro changes that are being

9:23

made the small adjustments so for

9:26

example if if we're on this trajectory

9:28

for Tesla or better yet even make it

9:30

sort of like if that's the trajectory

9:31

for Tesla right I think it's very

9:33

difficult for Wall Street to realize oh

9:36

okay Tesla just did that in terms of an

9:39

adjustment right that was really what

9:41

investor day was was sort of that little

9:43

adjustment like that by the way is how

9:45

we're revising going forward right and

9:47

so of course in the short term the

9:48

Market's like okay that's very difficult

9:50

for us to understand but the reality is

9:52

when you look in the long term what

9:55

happens is if you stay on the trajectory

9:57

this might be your growth if you

10:00

continue with the micro adjustments your

10:02

growth might be like this and then this

10:04

is actually where the bulk of the value

10:07

is created in the long term it's when

10:09

those small micro adjustments actually

10:11

compound to being something extremely

10:13

meaningful it's in in my opinion I see

10:16

this very personally in my life it's

10:18

like starting my real estate startup

10:21

househack starting and actively managed

10:24

ETF uh you know buying a jet that

10:27

enables me to do social media manage an

10:30

ETF conduct a deep high level uh and

10:33

deep dive research so both high level

10:35

and deep dive research and start what

10:38

could be in my opinion knock on wood no

10:40

guarantees a 10 to 50 billion dollar

10:42

company in the future right house high

10:43

like those are the little micro

10:45

adjustments that are happening right now

10:47

so I actually resonate a lot with Tesla

10:49

and and the the changes that they're

10:51

making for the long term and so in case

10:54

it's not abundantly clear what we heard

10:56

was fantastic from a long-term point of

10:58

view in the short term the inflections

11:01

seem so minor and because they were

11:04

uncoordinated and because the these

11:07

long-term benefits were not properly

11:09

explained I think it was a slap in the

11:12

face to investors and employees and

11:14

potentially new employees in the short

11:17

term the vision of Tesla could have

11:19

easily been coordinated without actually

11:22

providing exact details nobody's saying

11:25

hey you need to guarantee us oh the

11:27

model 2 was coming out you know January

11:29

1st 2025. nobody's suggesting that that

11:33

is what Tesla needed to do but

11:35

coordinating the vision is what was

11:37

missing from investor day and that's why

11:39

investor day really in my opinion was

11:41

essentially clickbait in the long term

11:44

fantastic we could see the adjustments

11:46

but for investors in the short term

11:48

oopsies but anyway let's keep going here

11:51

with what the institution said so Morgan

11:53

Stanley suggests that Master Plan 3

11:55

entails immense levels of vertical

11:57

integration and this vertical

11:59

integration will enable Tesla to iterate

12:01

far faster and with less waste than

12:05

other auto manufacturers this is

12:07

important minimizing that waste is

12:10

critical even to the point of and

12:13

institutions are picking up on this as

12:15

well moving from a 12 to 48 volt

12:17

architecture Burns less or I should say

12:21

ways less energy right because it can

12:24

operate more efficiently with

12:26

potentially smaller cabling you

12:29

potentially have less heat that that

12:32

escapes from the internal architecture

12:34

of the vehicle and these benefits

12:36

compound over time they might seem minor

12:38

in the short term but they compound over

12:40

time that is actually an idea that lucid

12:42

has been integrating into their vehicle

12:44

for a very very long time the idea that

12:46

we should operate these vehicles at

12:48

higher voltage voltages so that way we

12:50

could reduce amperages basic electrical

12:53

law anyway we believe customers or

12:57

rather consumers will one day look back

12:59

at electric vehicles from 2023 the way

13:02

we look back at cell phones from the

13:04

1980s remember Gordon gekko's phone when

13:07

he was on the beach out east in the

13:09

movie Wall Street Tesla wants to be the

13:11

largest manufacturer in the world by

13:13

some margin with that ambition achieving

13:15

cost leadership is deterministic in

13:17

other words without achieving cost uh

13:20

efficiency yeah end up screwed well

13:23

that's obvious and that's exactly what

13:25

Tesla's doing for the long term again

13:27

they didn't pull that picture together

13:29

for us but that's okay that's where I'm

13:31

trying to also will help pull the

13:33

picture together and I think that's what

13:34

people and media do that's why I

13:36

actually think it's very important that

13:38

we have the social media we have today

13:39

not mainstream media I think we're all

13:41

frustrated with most of mainstream media

13:43

but I think that's why we come to social

13:45

media is to get the perspective that

13:47

maybe isn't properly laid out by our

13:50

government well almost certainly not

13:51

properly laid out or in this case Tesla

13:54

we would expect to see most if not all

13:56

of today's Legacy auto company executive

13:58

teams study the materials presented

14:00

today and tour Giga Austin as they have

14:03

toured Tesla Fremont facilities in the

14:05

past Innovations brought to Market by

14:08

Tesla become the industry standard and

14:11

are ultimately used by all automakers

14:13

not unlike how Henry Ford was moving the

14:15

assembly line now this is really

14:17

interesting because you really have

14:19

Morgan Stanley again maintaining their

14:22

price Target and keeping their view of

14:25

Tesla in line but at the same time

14:28

they're saying oh my gosh nobody is

14:31

going to be able to compete with Tesla

14:33

so this is why we're making this video

14:34

right to coordinate and sort of

14:37

consolidate what is Wall Street taking

14:39

away from this it's also worth noting by

14:41

the way that shipments from Giga

14:43

Shanghai climbed to 74

14:46

402 and this is 74 402 Vehicles were

14:50

delivered from Shanghai last month that

14:52

is up 13 from the prior month it's down

14:55

off some of the very high numbers we saw

14:57

at the end of Q4 last year uh but uh but

15:00

but still finally returning to a larger

15:03

Trend as that main export facility for

15:06

Teslas

15:07

suppliers on watch I actually think this

15:09

is one of the reasons you saw uh MP

15:13

materials drop about 13 yesterday was

15:15

this talk about removing rare earth

15:17

materials from uh from Tesla's engines

15:20

was an immediate slap in the face to MP

15:22

materials and this is where it's it's in

15:25

my opinion quite ridiculous for people

15:28

to say that the short-term stock

15:30

movements or or short-term uh

15:32

occurrences uh don't matter to stocks

15:35

they absolutely do I mean look at this

15:37

you know what Tesla just did to MP

15:39

materials it's it's not just that the

15:41

stock fell eleven ten percent ten eleven

15:44

percent it's not just that you know what

15:46

Tesla just did to MP material they sent

15:49

a massive red flag to anyone working at

15:53

MP material solely focused on Rare Earth

15:57

minerals

15:58

that your days may be limited doubt has

16:02

just been cast on the jobs of anyone

16:05

working on rare Earths in uh magnet

16:08

motors which are basically electric

16:09

motors right electromagnet right electro

16:12

electric electricity and magnetism are

16:13

essentially the same Force it's kind of

16:16

cool actually if you've ever broken a

16:17

taken apart uh a a motor you'd know that

16:20

uh it's it's pretty fascinating how how

16:22

similar they are I mean they're

16:24

essentially the same Force it's awesome

16:25

I mean that's how generators work after

16:27

all right anywho so uh going back to

16:31

Morgan Stanley over here Morgan Stanley

16:33

says Tesla's on a mission to further

16:35

reduce part count mass weight and

16:37

complexity while bringing more

16:38

components in-house smaller and less

16:40

complex wire harnesses fewer silicon

16:43

carbide chips and the elimination of

16:45

rare Earths in permanent magnet motors

16:47

where a few examples provided during

16:49

investor day on the raw material side of

16:51

the quiet stream we still haven't seen

16:53

too terribly much detail in terms of

16:54

what Tesla exactly wants to do here

16:56

however what we did see is 20 different

16:59

Executives across all operational

17:01

disciplines now Morgan Stanley says no

17:04

teleprompters in my opinion it's

17:05

actually incorrect that there were sort

17:08

of preview screens in front of the

17:09

presenters it was very obvious that at

17:12

least one of the engineers was straight

17:14

up reading from the computer screen in

17:16

front of front of them and look that's

17:18

fine but let me just from sort of a

17:20

media point of view say you could take

17:23

all of the information from these

17:25

executives

17:26

but you need someone else there to

17:29

consolidate or to simplify what they're

17:32

saying for example this is how you could

17:33

make the presentation so much easier you

17:36

have one person talking about let's say

17:39

full self-driving right and they go into

17:41

the weeds of full self-driving this this

17:42

this and then you have somebody else it

17:44

could even be musk himself but anyone

17:46

somebody with a media mindset who comes

17:49

out and says now those are the details

17:52

here is the impact of what that means

17:55

what that means is we believe we are

17:58

five years at least five years ahead of

18:02

the competition we believe that because

18:04

it's taken X number of hours to train

18:06

our neural Nets an X number of miles

18:09

driven this is where the competition is

18:11

this is where we are now we also think

18:14

we're X percent closer to achieving full

18:17

self-driving for all vehicles without a

18:19

driver even present to where within the

18:22

next X number of years we think we can

18:25

release a vehicle with no steering wheel

18:27

now no guarantees yet but we are you

18:31

know 95 of the way there or whatever

18:33

right I'm making up some of the numbers

18:34

or leaving them as variables because

18:36

that's for Tesla to do but what they

18:38

need is a translator basically

18:40

and that's either going to be Tesla or

18:44

it's going to be potentially social

18:46

media right but it's more difficult for

18:48

it to be social media because we don't

18:50

have all of the extra answers to create

18:53

the impacts from that information it's

18:55

sort of like here's the platter of

18:57

information overload and nobody's really

18:59

tying it together in terms of okay how

19:02

does this actually Stack Up Now how how

19:04

close are we now to FSD right we don't

19:07

know because we didn't have somebody

19:09

consolidate that information that's my

19:11

frustration with Tesla don't get me

19:13

wrong the information is fantastic what

19:15

happened is fantastic but by skimping

19:18

out on somebody who can consolidate the

19:19

message much the way that Apple does at

19:22

an apple presentation

19:24

will you end up losing and you hurt

19:27

people and investors in the short term

19:28

that's why I think it's hilarious when

19:31

people say oh Kevin's just a short-term

19:34

mind investor

19:35

I I don't even need to continue to

19:36

defend that uh it's it's so ludicrous

19:38

nobody risks their entire net worth for

19:42

a startup if they're not a long-term

19:44

minded individual nobody throws

19:46

everything uh in their reputation onto

19:49

that startup or an actively managed ETF

19:52

or or you know a publicly flip-flops and

19:56

gets the world to hate them even though

19:58

they're doing what ultimately was the

20:00

right thing nobody does that if they

20:02

have a short-term minded Outlook right

20:04

if I had a short-term minded Outlook I'd

20:07

care more about subscribers and pleasing

20:09

everybody when the reality is what I do

20:11

is I provide my real opinion whether

20:14

that's on politics or stocks

20:17

I'm gonna keep doing that anyway uh

20:19

let's see here the non-avail of the

20:22

model two I mean I I didn't expect a

20:25

model 2 to get presented either neither

20:26

they did Barclays neither did Morgan

20:28

Stanley there were a lot of people who

20:29

did uh there was the cannibalization

20:31

argument that Barclays talked about that

20:33

they were not going to do this because

20:34

they could potentially cannibalize sales

20:36

in the future that's fine uh this this

20:38

is not that big of a deal it would have

20:40

been nice though to have sort of a rap

20:42

of okay got it so gen 3 50 less cost how

20:46

about like at least some kind of guide

20:47

like are we looking at end of the decade

20:50

the beginning of the 2030s are we

20:52

looking at you know 2027 like how about

20:54

I mean this could have in my opinion

20:56

been as simple as this you could have

20:58

one single slideshow uh a little and and

21:01

this is this is going to be my estimate

21:03

by the way right so it's this is going

21:04

to be my my speculation here but I think

21:06

you could have had uh one slide that

21:08

would have said something like this

21:10

here's our roadmap

21:12

we think uh a semi-truck uh full scale

21:15

by 2025

21:17

cyber truck uh full scale uh let's put

21:21

that actually right here and we'll call

21:24

this by let's say 2024.

21:26

uh cyber truck first delivery 2023 and

21:31

then what you could say something like

21:32

this is Mexico Giga 2024

21:37

uh complete right and then you go over

21:40

here and you say Mexico Giga uh would be

21:44

let's say uh ramping 2025. uh Mexico

21:48

Giga uh potentially releases first

21:54

you know next gen vehicle Q4 2025 Mexico

22:01

Giga ramps next gen vehicle 2026. uh you

22:07

know uh first first Optimus Optimus

22:12

robots on a floor by let's say 2027

22:17

right like this this kind of road map is

22:20

something that would not have been very

22:22

difficult for Tesla to give in my

22:24

opinion unfortunately that wasn't given

22:27

and again it doesn't have to be perfect

22:29

like we could we could say look we can't

22:32

guarantee this result but at least some

22:36

sort of vision of how does this all

22:37

stack together how does the Mexico

22:40

gigafactory fit in to the plan you know

22:43

we heard it was announced but we don't

22:45

know how it fits into the plan now we

22:46

think we know we think that batteries

22:49

are going to manufacture get

22:50

manufactured at Giga Texas and then

22:52

potentially go to Vehicles assembled in

22:54

the Mexico gigafactory at a lower cost

22:57

maybe with Optimus robots and at the

22:59

same time cheaper Mexican labor and when

23:01

you combine that you get the recipe for

23:04

potentially a model 2 with the parallel

23:07

processing that we learned about rather

23:09

than serial processing that's by the way

23:11

is a very important word so if you're a

23:13

Tesla investor you really have to know

23:14

this so see a parallel processing is

23:18

basically taking the car and moving it

23:21

from Station to Station to Station right

23:22

that's what cars do now the uh oh sorry

23:26

this is this is a series in series

23:28

processing my mistake that's in series

23:31

processing in parallel processing is

23:34

you're taking different components of

23:36

the vehicle and your manufacturing on

23:39

the you're essentially putting these

23:40

together at the same time so if this

23:42

direction here represents time then

23:46

rather than the product moving through

23:47

time the product at the same time is

23:50

manufactured you know in in just

23:53

separate parts so parts right

23:55

essentially the idea here is that now

23:57

you can have robots work on different

23:59

parts of the vehicle at the same time

24:00

you assemble it like Legos and you cut

24:02

the time down substantially that's

24:04

required for manufacturing these right

24:05

now unfortunately uh it doesn't seem

24:08

like that Tesla Optimus robot is

24:11

particularly close especially since what

24:14

individuals have posted online is a

24:16

close-up of the robot hand here and we

24:19

do see that the Optimus you know grabs

24:23

something here but what's quite odd is

24:26

when you look at this closely it

24:28

actually looks like this uh this hose

24:31

here uh it's a it's a hose sleeve

24:34

for what looks like maybe you know I

24:36

don't know 14 16 gauge wiring you can

24:39

see that gauged wiring right here it's

24:41

very small I mean this is like sort of

24:43

the typical wiring that you might see uh

24:45

for for uh you know up to a 120 volt

24:47

circuit or something like that but could

24:49

be even smaller but anyway it's covered

24:51

by this hose right here uh and it looks

24:54

like this is some sort of uh actuator

24:56

here or or Servo so to speak and uh the

25:00

idea here is that the Tesla Optimus can

25:03

already unplug this and it's sort of a

25:05

way of maybe unembarrassing the Optimus

25:08

presentation

25:10

the last time we had sort of the Optimus

25:12

event where you know it it was still

25:14

impressive to see okay Real World Vision

25:17

is coming to robots we know like this is

25:19

fantastic but it's still it wasn't the

25:21

best presentation right and so this

25:23

video is sort of an attempt to uh maybe

25:26

fix that by showing us a robot that that

25:28

appears to be able to walk and and

25:30

position its hand where this rope is or

25:33

this hose is the problem is this hose

25:35

begins to move well below well before

25:38

the Optimus actually makes contact with

25:42

the hose which actually implies that

25:44

there's an individual off camera to the

25:47

left over here who's actually pulling

25:49

the hose out of the actuator for the

25:53

robot uh and this is really more click

25:55

bait here from Tesla ready for this

25:57

watch very slowly

25:59

see look at that that cable pulls out

26:03

before

26:05

see look at right here right here

26:06

there's no contact made by the hands yet

26:09

right the hands are not really I mean we

26:11

can't tell that this is actually being

26:13

contacted yet yeah look right right here

26:15

okay there we go

26:17

how how does this actually start pulling

26:21

back

26:22

we don't know now some now maybe maybe

26:26

we're just getting a bad angle here but

26:27

why does it look as though somebody else

26:30

is potentially pulling it Maybe not

26:31

maybe maybe that fingertip is a lot

26:34

thicker than we think it is or there's a

26:36

larger piece of metal that's sort of the

26:38

inside of the hand here inside of the

26:40

finger that is actually lifting this but

26:42

there's some rumor that this is actually

26:45

a person who's pulled this plug out

26:48

because the plug actually seems to pull

26:50

out well before

26:53

the hand does anything look at that now

26:55

on this side so I've been at I've had

26:57

your attention here now I want your

26:59

attention to go to this plug over here

27:00

pay attention to the plug watch the plug

27:03

come out

27:05

before because I see your comments some

27:07

of you saying oh it lifts it up okay

27:09

yeah maybe maybe the metal stick right

27:11

here uh or or maybe it's possible Right

27:13

but now I want you to tell me if this

27:15

plug coming out is possible so pay

27:16

attention out to this plug okay ready

27:17

for this

27:18

watch the plug come out before the hand

27:20

moves to the left

27:22

and plug plugs come in right here plug

27:26

comes out right here

27:27

is it possible

27:29

that the plug comes out because the

27:32

finger puts so much pressure on the hose

27:35

that the plug starts coming out yes it's

27:38

possible but it looks like the plug is

27:41

just floating out of there before the

27:44

hand actually really pulls

27:47

right and the other thing now part three

27:49

is watch this motion where the hose gets

27:54

joint almost before the hand pulls back

27:57

okay look at this in this Frame that

27:59

you're about to see yoink it's it's

28:02

almost as if it's happening before the

28:05

hand is actually appropriately moving

28:07

back now we're not sure maybe it is

28:10

possible it is possible that there's a

28:12

lot of tension on this piece right here

28:15

and if there's a lot of tension on this

28:17

piece uh and on the hose maybe it comes

28:20

flinging out when there's enough

28:21

pressure put on this by the fingers to

28:23

pull it out of the socket maybe maybe

28:25

but then again then again we do know

28:29

that there has been a reputation of

28:31

Tesla to kind of show things that aren't

28:34

really working yet just for the

28:36

excitement Factor now in the future it

28:38

will work so it's fine it's not a big

28:40

deal but again what would have been nice

28:42

would have been a little bit more Vision

28:43

around the idea of hey look you know

28:46

this is where we've gotten to now with

28:48

the Optimus we think the Optimus is

28:51

going to be on the floor of a factory

28:52

doing stuff like this or at least in Bay

28:54

data as soon as 2024 right like you

28:58

don't need to give us guarantees you

29:00

don't have to give us absolute exacts

29:02

but put the puzzle together for people

29:05

that's what's missing and that's because

29:06

Tesla's not investing in a media person

29:08

or a media Department really here right

29:11

it's sort of just like here we'll put it

29:12

all on the plate and we'll sort of let

29:13

social media or the mainstream media run

29:15

rampant anyway let's keep going here

29:17

with some of the investor information so

29:20

we did learn that the uh the powertrain

29:23

might go down to about a thousand a

29:25

dollar cost per vehicle electric

29:26

architecture uh this is where they talk

29:29

about a 16x reduction in lost power by

29:32

moving potentially from a 12 volt

29:34

architecture to 48 volt architecture

29:36

it's important to know that when they

29:38

say here reducing current uh Factor by

29:42

4X that does not actually mean really

29:45

anything the only thing that matters is

29:48

the potential lack of waste because if

29:51

you increase the voltage you will

29:53

increase the yeah or if you increase the

29:56

voltage you will decrease the amperage

29:58

but the wattage is the same the power

30:02

used is the same the only thing you save

30:06

is potentially having a more efficient

30:10

wiring system that releases less heat so

30:13

potentially that's where you save the

30:15

energy but from a formulaic point of

30:17

view just because you increase the

30:19

voltage does not make the system more

30:21

efficient it's just in potentially the

30:24

fact that there's less heat that's

30:25

important think about actually why

30:28

Europe uses the 240 volt architecture

30:31

it's not like when you go plug in a

30:33

microwave in Europe it's using more

30:36

power than American uh uh microwaves

30:40

it's using the same wattage a thousand

30:43

watt microwave over there is the same as

30:45

a thousand watt microwave over here

30:46

that's important to remember the

30:49

difference though is if you have more

30:51

efficient wiring you could potentially

30:53

use thinner wires because they don't

30:55

need to be as overheat rated and that's

30:57

how you could potentially make building

30:58

and construction more efficient by

31:00

having the entire property constructed

31:02

out of a 240 volt wiring system it also

31:04

means you have 240 volt plugs everywhere

31:07

so if you want to plug in a washing

31:08

machine or an electric dryer or a stove

31:12

you don't have to run a different set of

31:14

cabling for that like you do here in

31:15

America now it's not to be confused with

31:18

people who take an American hair dryer

31:20

that's designed for 120 a volt system

31:23

and plug it into a 240 volt system with

31:25

a converter in Europe yeah that thing's

31:28

going to glow and look like it's using a

31:30

whole lot more power that's because it's

31:32

drawing twice as much power as it's

31:34

designed for it okay but again the

31:37

efficiency here is is really not in the

31:39

formulaic change it's potentially in

31:42

that the wiring would would lead to a

31:45

reduction in sort of wasted energy okay

31:47

that's fine again lucid's been doing

31:49

that

31:50

robot was able to provide a perform

31:52

menial tasks as originally intended

31:54

that's fine we saw that and we just

31:56

commented on this I did like the

31:59

estimate that there would be potentially

32:00

more than one humanoid for every human

32:02

at the factory I did think that was

32:04

actually fantastic and I really enjoyed

32:06

that uh that that sort of forecast so

32:08

I'm going to go through just some some

32:10

more of those the main parts of Wall

32:11

Street here mega pack can connect to any

32:14

grid globally it's the most energy dense

32:16

Solution on the market at upwards of 300

32:19

megawatts per acre megawatt hours mega

32:23

pack is 2x more energy dense than a

32:25

traditional power plant fantastic should

32:28

Tesla be able to hit the cost targets

32:30

outlayed today when coupled with OP X

32:33

discipline we find it hard to see a way

32:36

in which Legacy automakers can compete

32:39

with Tesla in terms of EV profitability

32:42

that right here is a fantastic line

32:44

Morgan Stanley is saying we find it hard

32:47

to find a way for it for legacies to

32:49

compete with Tesla we already know that

32:52

Ford is not expected to be profitable

32:54

until 2026 and they're already miserably

32:57

failing GM is probably also not

33:00

profitable uh and we're not even talking

33:02

about profitable we're talking about

33:04

wildly unprofitable right it's kind of

33:06

like rivian when we looked at the rivian

33:08

numbers they are spending on a net basis

33:11

three hundred thousand dollars to make

33:14

an 82 000 car as of their Q4 earnings on

33:17

a gross basis they are spending two

33:20

hundred thousand dollars per vehicle to

33:22

make an eighty two thousand dollar car

33:24

it's incredible okay but anyway uh so

33:27

they are maintaining their price target

33:28

of 220 for 2023

33:33

pretty low no no changes here on price

33:36

Target from Morgan Stanley uh we've got

33:39

Bank of America suggesting that the

33:41

presentation was a little light on

33:42

details they're also maintaining their

33:44

25 uh 225 Target uh it's worth noting

33:47

that again when they talk about being

33:49

light on details they're really talking

33:51

about uh combining the vision where like

33:54

the dates that I talked about I think

33:57

are actually realistic the dates that I

33:58

gave but Tesla should be the one putting

34:01

that Vision out so that way we know what

34:03

are they working towards I can guess all

34:05

day long but what are they working

34:07

towards it's kind of like when Elon Musk

34:09

poo pooed the idea of the copy and paste

34:11

that's fine but that's the first time

34:13

we've seen him poo poo that idea okay

34:15

fine don't copy and paste make every

34:17

gigafactory different fine then maybe

34:20

that aligns with the idea that maybe the

34:22

Mexico gigafactory is for the model too

34:24

maybe there's another gigafactory that's

34:25

for the Optimus robot right and that the

34:27

gigafactories are just basically tuned

34:29

to different purposes maybe that's why

34:31

Elon Musk seem to kind of shake his head

34:33

at that idea that's fine but again

34:35

immediate person could combine all those

34:37

details that's why it's middle finger

34:39

for short term purposes long term I mean

34:42

I I don't think I don't I I would

34:45

venture to say there's nobody more

34:46

bullish uh on on YouTube at least uh uh

34:49

than me so uh Sandy Monroe uh now what's

34:53

interesting is he's extremely bullish

34:55

but at least when I had my last

34:56

interview with him and I'm going to talk

34:58

to him this April about that uh likely

35:00

when we meet together is he was was an

35:04

argue he was he was Pro not investing in

35:07

uh Tesla stock uh during the time of my

35:09

interview which maybe ended up being a

35:11

good thing I don't think that anyone

35:12

could have predicted that Elon Musk was

35:14

going to dump as much as he did for

35:15

Twitter but uh but it'll be interesting

35:17

to sort of get his updated perspective

35:18

on that so uh um Sandy Monroe said

35:21

something very interesting though he

35:23

says uh he says and this is why I want

35:25

to ask him he says he's putting his

35:26

money not booting his money he says I'm

35:28

putting my money on uh Tesla as model 2

35:32

the 25 000 vehicle basically being Like

35:35

the Model T and the beetle not an

35:37

expensive luxury car but a mass-produced

35:40

style of car that everybody can afford

35:42

that was the idea of the Model T that

35:44

was the idea of the Volkswagen Beetle

35:46

that everybody could afford it and Sandy

35:49

thinks that's uh that's likely to be

35:51

essentially the model too and we're not

35:53

clear if that'll be a smaller vehicle

35:55

but anyway uh the Bank of America

35:56

maintaining their 225. let's jump into

36:00

Barclays three Barclays all right let's

36:03

go to Goldman Sachs first so here's

36:04

Goldman Sachs the bottom line is we

36:07

believe the event the event should

36:09

increase investor confidence in Tesla's

36:12

ability to reduce cost by 50 with its

36:14

next-gen platform however we believe

36:17

many investors were hoping for more

36:18

specifics on when a third gen vehicle

36:21

could begin shipping and therefore the

36:24

lack of clarity beyond the comment that

36:27

they're working as fast as they can

36:28

could be viewed as a disappointment to

36:31

some I agree that's exactly problem

36:34

again the content fantastic the summary

36:37

bad now unfortunately their 12-month

36:40

price Target here is 200 so they

36:42

actually see more near-term downside now

36:45

I think that's kind of remarkable uh

36:47

because they actually think and this

36:49

blows my mind they actually think

36:52

that Tesla is going to grow EPS

36:55

negatively in 2024 3. this year they

36:59

think Tesla's EPS will be negative in

37:02

2023.

37:03

okay all right whatever uh and then and

37:06

then go back to maybe 50 to 20 growth in

37:09

the next few years

37:10

uh so you know somebody here nightclub

37:12

says I don't think they want to put out

37:13

a date because it's never met and it

37:15

hurts investors I disagree with that

37:18

highly I actually think it's very

37:19

important to put out a date because it

37:22

actually creates the pressure to achieve

37:24

close to that date right if you come out

37:28

and say let me put it this way okay

37:29

think about it this way everybody does

37:31

this everybody on a human level can do

37:33

this

37:34

oh I'm gonna start working out and I'm

37:38

gonna get buff or whatever or I'm gonna

37:40

exercise more and we tell ourselves that

37:43

yet when do we actually do it we

37:45

generally don't right most of us don't

37:48

and it's just the way it is where we go

37:50

once in a while oh we're going to eat

37:53

better right well if we actually set a

37:55

goal I will have lost X weight by X date

37:59

well now you measure your performance

38:01

towards that date and even if you miss

38:04

it you're more likely to have performed

38:06

substantially better leading up to that

38:07

date than if you didn't actually set a

38:10

goal date setting a goal date and

38:12

communicating a goal date now actually

38:15

unifies Tesla staff at all right might

38:19

be ambitious but let's try to make it

38:22

happen when you just do ah we're doing

38:24

our best you take the pressure off you

38:27

should never take the pressure off it's

38:30

like my goals with house hack my goal

38:32

with house hack is to and again no

38:34

guarantees is to IPO an extremely

38:37

profitable company that could be in my

38:39

opinion worth billions of dollars in the

38:40

future

38:41

before the end of the decade before I I

38:44

don't want to get into the 2030s without

38:46

it having IPO now I don't know what's

38:48

going to happen who knows maybe there'll

38:49

be a market crash in 2029 and it's not

38:52

going to make sense I have no idea

38:54

what's going to happen right but I'm

38:57

setting goals and so I think it's

38:59

important to set goals and then hold

39:01

yourself accountable to those if you

39:03

miss that's okay then just provide a new

39:05

update what changed how are we doing in

39:08

an adjusted time frame I think setting

39:10

time frames is actually extremely

39:12

important and this this idea that oh

39:15

well you know they always miss their

39:16

time frame so let's just stop doing time

39:18

frames is a ludicrous example uh or a

39:21

ludicrous suggestion for for goal

39:24

setting I mean that basically says don't

39:26

set goals because you miss all your

39:27

goals anyway you know don't don't try to

39:31

strive and Achieve something because

39:32

you're gonna fail anyway that's a

39:34

defeatist point of view that's the worst

39:36

way to look at it time frames are very

39:38

very very important uh goal setting very

39:41

very very very very important you know

39:43

send McGuire here says Tesla and Time

39:46

Flame frames and and says uh clown clown

39:48

clown that's fine you you can argue all

39:52

you want that Tesla clowns with its time

39:54

frames but setting time frames and goals

39:57

is extremely important anyway Goldman

39:59

Sachs gives a little bit of a summary of

40:01

some of the things that we saw you know

40:02

where we're going to see reductions in

40:04

fossil fuel we use the big one getting

40:06

the grid to Renewables the next big one

40:08

EVS I actually thought it was very

40:10

interesting that moving planes and boats

40:13

2 EV would actually only lead to about a

40:15

five percent reduction in fossil fuels

40:17

showing you that most of the reduction

40:19

of fossil fuels comes from moving the

40:20

grid to Renewables and then moving EVS

40:23

to Renewables I thought that was really

40:24

interesting because like I would love to

40:27

use less jet fuel like first of all it's

40:30

expensive uh and and you know from uh

40:33

from like uh from from the point of view

40:36

of efficiency I mean it's fast but it

40:39

burns a lot of fuel you know how much

40:41

fuel a Boeing 747 Burns

40:44

so when when people ask hey how many

40:47

miles to the gallon does a Boeing 747

40:49

get you actually have to flip it around

40:51

it's actually about I believe when I

40:54

last look I have to get fact check it's

40:56

it's two to five but I'm gonna go with

40:58

five because I think that's what it is

40:59

it's about five gallons per mile

41:02

for a Boeing 747 to fly around that's

41:06

crazy

41:07

five gallons per mile for a Boeing 747

41:11

to fly around right very very so so I

41:13

initially thought like wow okay I

41:14

thought like Freight and and planes

41:17

would would actually be a great place

41:18

for efficiency but probably because

41:20

there are so many more cars and so many

41:22

more grids that's actually not uh the

41:24

way to look at it now fortunately I see

41:27

what I I'm not trying to like Pat myself

41:28

on the back but I purposefully wanted to

41:30

get a smaller plane to be as efficient

41:33

as possible I could have spent more

41:35

money and had a plane that's larger sit

41:37

more people but I don't need more people

41:38

in it uh my fuel burn on my plan is

41:40

about 165 gallons uh per hour and that

41:45

works out to roughly about 3.5 miles per

41:49

gallon uh so not great it's pretty low

41:52

but then again you're going 565 miles

41:54

per hour roughly at Max Speed there's

41:56

some takeoff considerations there and it

41:58

changes some of the averages a little

41:59

bit uh but but a larger plane that we

42:03

were also considering last year

42:04

especially would have gotten about one

42:06

mile per gallon uh yeah what would have

42:08

gotten about one mile per gallon so

42:09

we're like yeah let's try to be we get

42:11

it let's try to be as efficient as

42:12

possible but anyway I just mentioned

42:14

that because I think it's interesting I

42:15

don't think people generally think about

42:16

like how many miles per gallon planes

42:18

actually get uh and uh and then at the

42:21

same time I thought it was very

42:22

interesting how uh moving uh planes and

42:26

boats to sustainability full

42:27

sustainability would only lead to a five

42:29

percent reduction fossil fuels that was

42:30

interesting I get it like on a per

42:33

vehicle basis it's not as great but from

42:36

from uh from an overall uh energy

42:38

sustainability standard it's probably

42:40

the last place to get innovated uh

42:42

because it has the least impact I

42:43

thought that was interesting anyway here

42:45

we talk about balancing the serial line

42:47

approach versus the parallel approach

42:48

how that could potentially lead to 40 44

42:51

better operator density and 30 better

42:54

space-time efficiency

42:56

uh some other efficiencies here we

42:58

didn't really get any kind of autonomy

43:00

targets talked a little bit about

43:01

charging and wanting to build more talk

43:03

about software Mega packs uh we talked

43:06

about implications here we go Goldman

43:07

Sachs bottom line is we believe this

43:10

event should increase investor

43:11

confidence in Tesla's ability to reduce

43:13

costs by 50 with its next-gen platform

43:15

given the breadth and depth of Tesla's

43:17

team and how its vertically integrated

43:18

model allows it to optimize on both cost

43:20

and performance however we believe many

43:22

investors were hoping for more specifics

43:24

on when a third generation vehicle could

43:27

be shipping and therefore the lack of

43:28

clarity beyond the comment that they're

43:30

working as fast as they could uh be in

43:32

the next couple of years is likely to be

43:34

viewed as a disappointment by some we

43:36

believe a couple of years would imply

43:38

the 2025 time frame and we continue to

43:40

believe later in 2025 would be more

43:42

probable probable I I actually agree

43:44

with about a 2026 for a model 2 time

43:47

frame I think that's very interesting

43:50

so let's see somebody here writes MPGs

43:53

for older people

43:54

[Laughter]

43:56

okay uh looking back can you explain

43:58

while by selling in January 22 was the

44:01

right thing when you had to pay taxes

44:03

and gains since buying back uh has a tab

44:05

blah blah blah okay so uh first of all

44:08

the absolutely the best decision I could

44:11

have made because I allocated my

44:13

portfolio from a large exposure to money

44:17

losing companies

44:18

to highly pricing power Centric

44:21

companies uh that in my opinion have

44:24

such high free cash flow that even in a

44:27

recession we are going to be able to

44:29

avoid real valuation compression now

44:32

things will be volatile but I would have

44:36

lost way more money had I not sold in

44:39

January of 2022 and told everybody about

44:41

that transparently I mean twice as much

44:43

it would have been it would have been

44:45

extremely painful now again I'm not

44:47

saying it was perfect

44:48

but I did my best to get away from money

44:51

losing companies and that was the

44:53

absolutely the right decision now when

44:55

you talk about taxes

44:57

and I made this clear for me my tax

44:59

situation is different than other people

45:01

I had the opportunity to buy a plane for

45:05

13 million dollars which eradicated all

45:08

of my capital gains from selling real

45:10

estate income and stocks

45:13

thank you tax system and specifically

45:16

Donald Trump who in 2017 through the tax

45:19

cut and jobs act expanded the

45:21

accelerated depreciation to 100 for

45:24

planes

45:25

yeah so anyway okay uh then we've got

45:28

one more over here so we've got Barclays

45:31

it's a fair question uh

45:34

uh let's see here

45:36

uh 2022 saved you from losing so much

45:38

money on those small company yeah small

45:40

companies got wrecked I mean there's

45:41

some companies that went down you know

45:42

90 95 and these are companies that I

45:45

warned hey like you don't want to hold

45:47

these suckers in a recession now some

45:49

people get mad at me they're like you

45:51

you said that was a good stock I'm like

45:52

yeah unless we go into a recessionary

45:54

environment that was like

45:57

was pretty clear about that but that's

45:58

okay people want to have somebody to

46:00

blame and that's fine so Tesla investor

46:02

day master plan 3 leveraging Tesla DNA

46:04

to achieve Mass scale so I I don't want

46:06

to read every part of the Barclays one

46:07

here so we're just going to go to some

46:09

of the highlights Tesla's looking at a

46:10

balance of parallel and serial

46:12

production we talked about that uh I

46:14

thought this was interesting they talk

46:15

about demonstrating bench strength by by

46:18

showing all of these these 13 additional

46:21

people who generally don't show up on uh

46:24

on earnings calls so I thought that was

46:26

very interesting and we expect the

46:28

Mexico plant to use battery cells

46:30

produced in Austin to make sure they

46:32

achieve a full tax credits from the

46:35

inflation reduction act now this was

46:37

also interesting they talk about

46:39

potential upside on deliveries they talk

46:41

about the idea that Tesla actually

46:43

produced 277 000 approximately units

46:46

through q1 2023 so far and that's about

46:49

two-thirds of their 20 their q1 estimate

46:52

of 423 vehicles and that suggests a

46:56

modest ahead of estimate scale although

46:59

we are kind of like two-thirds through

47:01

the season so but anyway they say that's

47:04

because of the production impacts from

47:06

the Chinese New Year and the slowdown in

47:07

January could actually mean they'll end

47:09

up beating production estimates for q1

47:13

good to know that's a little bullish on

47:15

q1 earnings right there uh limited color

47:17

provided on financials was disappointing

47:19

for some optimistic tone about uh about

47:23

uh raw materials yeah and I think that's

47:25

really a big big argument there is that

47:27

Tesla's not terribly worried about uh

47:30

you know this uh this the the future of

47:34

availability of lithium and otherwise

47:36

thinks uh they'll end up uh they'll end

47:39

up being just fine essentially on the

47:40

Commodities Factor so I think that's

47:43

quite fascinating uh and quite useful so

47:45

I think that gives us sort of a a deep

47:47

dive clarification and summary from not

47:50

only institutions but also for me on

47:52

Tesla I could not be more bullish until

47:54

I've shown my price targets for Tesla

47:56

plenty of times I'm looking at well over

47:59

500 in that 500 to 600 range you could

48:02

say 525 to keep it simple for 2025. I

48:06

think it's a phenomenal investment uh

48:08

going forward obviously that's not

48:10

personalized Financial advice I am a

48:11

licensed financial advisor I run an

48:13

actively managed ETF I you know I I have

48:16

a real estate startup I do a lot of

48:17

crazy things uh that you know look crazy

48:20

now but I think we're going to be

48:21

awesome in the long term but um yeah I

48:23

mean I'm a big fan so I I want to make

48:26

that as clear as possible

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.