TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Banking Crisis & Global Recession | -80% Crash.

20m 37s3,436 words495 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

it's official Credit Suisse is being

0:03

acquired but uh what does this mean for

0:06

potential recession and what are charts

0:10

telling us that's probably the bigger

0:12

issue let's look at exactly that so

0:15

First Things First Financial conditions

0:18

as of this morning here on Monday nice

0:21

and tight we want these to remain tight

0:24

the tighter these Remain the less the

0:27

FED has to do because the market does it

0:29

for them this is what you want this is a

0:31

combination of not only bond yields

0:33

lending tightness what's going on in

0:35

stocks but other Financial assets as

0:37

well it is the Goldman Sachs Financial

0:38

conditions index compare that to the

0:42

five-year Break Even which is also very

0:44

important because we do not want to go

0:45

back to unanchored inflation

0:47

expectations what do we have here uh

0:50

stable drop over here uh last we checked

0:53

we were we had just fallen and now we're

0:56

holding stable down here you can see

0:58

we're almost at the same level levels

1:00

where we were right before January

1:02

January well let's see here I guess well

1:05

no this would be this was within January

1:07

this was about the second to third week

1:09

in January right here here's your

1:11

January window there's your Fab here's

1:12

your March there we go so right before

1:14

we start getting that hot January data

1:16

we actually hit a pretty low level here

1:18

now where we sit now

1:21

excuse me uh where we sit now is uh

1:25

nearly at that low level uh which is

1:28

good because we really want to see this

1:30

2.18 get to somewhere around

1:33

1.6 which is around where we actually

1:36

expect the Federal Reserve to cut so

1:38

think about that for a moment if we

1:40

could get this 2.18 down to 1.6 then the

1:43

Federal Reserve might actually cut these

1:46

are the two charts they're really using

1:48

to drive everything now of course the

1:50

banking crisis is driving these two

1:51

charts driving inflation expectations to

1:54

come down because markets are starting

1:55

to expect that a recession is more

1:58

likely to occur especially because of

2:00

the banking crisis now more banking

2:02

crisis tighter lending standards which

2:04

means more likely hood of or a greater

2:07

likelihood of recession now what about

2:10

this Credit Suisse debacle that happened

2:12

well let's just say if you want to learn

2:15

how to lose 80 percent fast

2:19

the Saudis can teach you exactly exactly

2:22

what to do now even though they say

2:24

don't worry we're fine this is not a

2:28

good look for the Saudi uh private

2:30

investment fund or the uh quite frankly

2:32

the rather the Saudi National Bank not

2:34

the private investment fund it's the

2:36

Saudi National Bank a little different

2:38

the Saudi national bank took a 1.5

2:40

billion dollar stake in Credit Suisse in

2:44

November they bought those shares for

2:47

three dollars and 82 cents uh actually

2:50

that's

2:51

382 francs let me be clear with that

2:54

dollars slightly higher at about five

2:56

percent to convert to Dollars anyway uh

2:59

those are now only worth 76 francs per

3:03

share or 76 Cent francs Point 76 francs

3:08

per share here we go that's how to say

3:10

it that's an 80 loss in less than five

3:15

months as a UBS is acquiring Credit

3:18

Suisse for a bargain the entire 1

3:22

166 year history for Credit Suisse comes

3:25

to an end with this and what's actually

3:27

remarkable is even though there's an 80

3:30

loss for someone like the or an

3:33

institution like the Saudi National Bank

3:35

in this Credit Suisse acquisition it's

3:38

actually even more wild is the fact that

3:41

usually Equity gets written to zero

3:44

before you actually start seeing

3:46

bondholders which are generally deemed

3:48

to be senior debt holders get completely

3:51

written off but that's not what happened

3:54

with the uh Bail inable Bonds we talked

3:58

about these a few days ago so we'll keep

3:59

that discussion on these shorts since

4:01

they're a little complicated but there

4:02

are these fancy things called at1 bonds

4:06

they're nicknamed bonds with a grenade

4:09

attached to them I know that doesn't

4:11

really roll off the tongue but that's

4:13

kind of what people call them because

4:14

they're really high yield but they're

4:16

also potentially explosive now we just

4:19

had an about 17.3 billion dollar write

4:22

down of those in other words these Bail

4:24

inable Bonds were written down from

4:26

having a value of somewhere around when

4:29

we last talked about this on Thursday 66

4:31

cents uh for each dollar of bond uh that

4:35

that existed to zero so in other words

4:38

they were written off completely as

4:40

worthless that's 12 times larger than

4:43

any other bail inable bond Extinction

4:46

ever so oopsie dupsy nobody was really

4:50

expecting that these would get written

4:53

to zero and Equity holders would still

4:56

be held up now there was a lot of talk

4:58

that these at ones were going to get

5:00

written down that's why we covered them

5:02

last week however usually you have to

5:06

respect Capital structures and seniority

5:10

on cap table so basically if there's a

5:13

preferred Bond or an at1 usually those

5:17

are supposed to see liquidation profits

5:19

before Equity like the shares that's not

5:23

what happened here and when these the

5:27

institutions were asked about this by

5:29

Bloomberg uh apparently there was a big

5:33

pause and everybody's kind of like a you

5:35

can almost hear sort of like a gasp in

5:37

the room and then response apparently

5:39

from Regulators are is this justice of

5:41

heavy do it

5:43

yeah so I I guess uh that sets a little

5:46

bit of a new standard for uh the way

5:49

people lose money in Europe uh This Is

5:52

Why by the way like long and short out

5:55

of all of this because let's talk more

5:56

about implications on how that affects

5:58

us long and short out of all of that

6:00

it's one of the reasons why I don't like

6:03

investing in foreign countries because

6:05

they do stuff like that that isn't dare

6:09

I say normal like it you know I don't

6:13

know what Chinese Regulators are going

6:15

to do or european Regulators at least I

6:17

know and can take comfort in the fact

6:20

that our Regulators in America uh are

6:23

incompetent and basically can't get

6:24

anything done most of the time because

6:26

it's too bureaucratic uh but but in

6:29

general we tend to like have have a

6:31

respect for at least things like that uh

6:33

the seniority of of the way uh that you

6:35

are supposed to lose money uh but anyway

6:38

uh it's kind of I guess the Beast that

6:40

you grow up with and get familiar with

6:42

uh that you end up being most

6:44

comfortable around I don't know some

6:46

people call that a home bias I just call

6:48

it ah I I I I get the American way a

6:52

little bit more even though I was born

6:54

in Germany uh but that's not Swiss

6:55

either anyway all right so

6:58

people were hoping that this was going

7:00

to contain some of the recessionary

7:03

drama and panic and fear that's been

7:05

circulating uh well apparently it's not

7:09

really helping especially since you're

7:11

still seeing a run on Regional Bank

7:14

stocks for example look at First

7:18

Republic Bank oh no it's down another

7:21

nearly 17 percent in pre-market here's

7:26

Credit Suisse down about 57 percent in

7:29

pre-market that makes sense because

7:32

that's about where it's being acquired

7:34

the acquisition price you would have to

7:36

convert this is again 0.76 francs 0.76

7:40

francs to USD works out to about 82

7:44

cents per share it's actually trading at

7:45

about 86 right now so a little bit of a

7:48

dislocation there in the pre-market then

7:51

we've got UBS UBS is actually up one

7:54

percent in the pre-market uh this has

7:57

been pretty volatile though at UBS about

8:00

an hour ago was down about six percent

8:03

in pre-market so the Market's still

8:05

trying to digest exactly what's going on

8:07

well you do have to keep in mind though

8:09

is UBS it sounds at least like is

8:12

getting a pretty Banger deal so listen

8:15

to this they wrote the deal expecting to

8:18

take nine billion dollars in losses now

8:22

that sounds crazy like why would you buy

8:24

a deal expecting to take nine billion

8:26

dollars in losses potentially up to

8:28

those sort of losses well my opinion

8:30

it's the same reason you would buy a

8:31

fixer-up or house except there's a

8:34

beautiful government guarantee that

8:35

makes this even more beautiful for them

8:37

listen to this imagine you buy a fixed

8:40

up or house like I teach in the zero to

8:43

millionaire real estate investing course

8:44

right you buy a fixer-upper house for

8:45

400 Grand in a 600 Grand neighborhood

8:47

and you're like I'm comfortable putting

8:49

in 50k of work okay well what if there's

8:52

another two hundred thousand dollars of

8:54

foundation work that you just weren't

8:55

aware of right that would suck but

8:57

because the deal is having to progress

9:00

so quickly to prevent Financial

9:02

contagion in the entire banking sector

9:04

from freaking out even more this this

9:07

government is saying don't worry if you

9:11

lose any more than that 50k in their

9:14

numbers nine billion dollars

9:16

we will cover you on your next 15

9:21

billion dollars in losses so in other

9:25

words yes UBS is technically picking up

9:28

a toxic asset but they're doing so

9:31

knowing that they're taking a write down

9:33

of up to nine bill but that's that's

9:35

already built into their purchase price

9:37

they know that and then for the next 15

9:40

billion dollars in losses

9:42

they Gucci the government is picking up

9:45

that tab which means yes the taxpayers

9:48

over in Europe are picking up that tap

9:51

potentially so now they can argue oh

9:54

right now taxpayers aren't paying for

9:56

anything yeah right that's what they

9:59

always want to do they always want to

10:01

dress it up as no don't worry we didn't

10:03

spend any tax money today

10:05

but for tomorrow we may have just signed

10:08

up for a lot of potential losses anyway

10:10

so that's how this is working with UBS

10:13

which is actually really interesting

10:14

because if you think about it it's

10:16

probably a very

10:18

opportune time to make these sort of

10:21

banking Acquisitions and think about it

10:23

a bank is about to go bankrupt and

10:25

Regulators are freaking out much like

10:28

with uh uh with the First Republic Bank

10:30

the FDIC couldn't find a buyer at their

10:33

first auction now they're running a

10:36

second auction bids are due Friday by

10:38

the way in case you want to put some

10:40

bids in on a you know a billion dollar

10:42

Bank uh bids are due Friday but anyway

10:45

the FDIC is frantically looking for a

10:49

buyer for this uh it's actually right

10:50

about four billion dollars right now and

10:53

they're hoping that they can close that

10:55

sale quickly same thing that happened

10:57

with Credit Suisse because they want to

10:58

minimize contagion uh the longer it

11:01

takes the more a signal is sent to

11:04

markets that these banks are extremely

11:06

toxic and the more The Regulators have

11:09

to sweeten the pie I mean look at how

11:11

much I had to sweeten the pile up high

11:12

with UBS well same thing here with

11:16

probably First Republic unless it's a

11:18

really sweet deal why would any private

11:20

institution go for it the people who

11:23

have to make up the deal to actually

11:25

make the numbers make sense

11:27

are probably going to be taxpayers via

11:30

The Regulators anyway

11:32

this is really important because it

11:35

could affect how deep of a recession we

11:38

go into and of course Mike Wilson over

11:41

at Morgan Stanley being the bear that he

11:44

is and that's okay it's okay to be a

11:46

bear we could still like you uh anyway

11:49

being the bear that he is he's very

11:51

unhappy about this banking crisis and

11:55

he's screaming that this banking crisis

11:56

is really going to be exactly what we

11:59

need to accelerate

12:02

the r word the recession now he

12:06

starts off by trying in his latest piece

12:08

here he starts out by trying to make

12:10

this argument that this is not

12:12

quantitative quantitative whatever

12:15

easing uh and we've talked about this

12:17

many times before but in short the idea

12:20

is that quantitative easing is is a

12:23

process by which we permanently expand

12:26

the mo the money supply whereas what's

12:29

happening now is many central banks are

12:31

providing liquidity via loans in other

12:34

words it's technically supposed to be

12:36

paid back but the reason it feels like

12:38

QE right now is because then I wrote

12:40

this little note on the side over here

12:42

is because technically what you're doing

12:44

is when you digitally print let's do it

12:47

like this there we go when you digitally

12:49

print money remember the FED digitally

12:51

prints the treasury physically prints

12:53

anyway when the FED digitally prints

12:56

money and then they transfer a loan to a

12:58

bank or an institution they're really

13:00

providing the ability for that Banker

13:02

institution to provide cash to

13:05

depositors that that temporarily has the

13:08

effect of increasing the money supply

13:10

until that money is paid back and then

13:13

the money supply in theory would come

13:14

back down so really what you have is

13:17

it's technically not QE it's technically

13:19

a transitory expansion of the money

13:23

supply

13:25

yeah so in other words uh yes in the

13:29

short term there is some a money

13:31

printing that does end up flowing

13:33

through uh however however there is this

13:36

potential that the velocity of money

13:39

actually goes down when the velocity of

13:43

money goes down and people are fearful

13:45

and they invest less they buy homes less

13:47

they spend they buy less cars they take

13:49

out less debt well then you could walk

13:51

into a recessionary environment and this

13:54

is where Morgan Stanley's Mike Wilson

13:56

suggests the pushback we've been

13:58

receiving for our basically bearish

14:00

complaining has consistently been that

14:03

the hard data has been holding up and

14:04

companies are not seeing the Slowdown

14:06

that's being forecast however now we

14:10

have the elusive Catalyst that should

14:12

lead to the convergence of hard and soft

14:15

data in other words

14:17

basically what they're saying is hey we

14:20

think this banking crisis is finally

14:22

going to lead to that earnings recession

14:24

that we've been talking about the reason

14:26

we believe that is because lending

14:28

standards are going to tighten and that

14:30

increases the risk of an actual credit

14:33

Crunch and that does not bode well for

14:36

growth see usually when credit standards

14:40

tighten like right here we could see the

14:42

Blue Line This is an inverted curve so

14:45

the tighter things go instead of being

14:47

up the chart is down and they do that so

14:49

they can align it with GDP to show when

14:51

GDP goes down so they invert Bank

14:54

tightening but basically the lower the

14:56

blue line goes the tighter lending is

14:58

and you can pretty much see in this

15:02

chart that goes back to the early 90s

15:03

that every time the blue line goes down

15:06

the yellow line comes down with it

15:08

that's real GDP now one of the downsides

15:12

in my opinion of using real GDP in this

15:14

analysis is we are in a high

15:17

inflationary environment so we could

15:19

actually be at a let's say one percent

15:22

GDP next year

15:24

uh you know we could have a growth rate

15:27

of 0.5 or 1 or whatever and usually GDP

15:31

is inflation adjusted okay worth noting

15:33

but the point is you could actually have

15:35

nominal growth but because we're in such

15:37

a higher inflation and inflationary

15:39

environment right now compared to what

15:40

we've seen at any point in time in this

15:43

chart notice how the 70s and 80s aren't

15:45

included here uh maybe maybe that quote

15:49

unquote this time could be different

15:50

which is a dangerous thing to say we

15:52

know that but of course it's just

15:53

something to consider uh but anyway

15:55

their argument is here generally the

15:58

yield curve steepening is the painful

16:01

period of time and and it's true usually

16:04

stuff breaks and the yield curve

16:06

steepens and that's basically what we're

16:09

seeing right now when you look at the

16:11

twos tens you can see that the spread

16:13

has actually narrowed that's called a

16:16

steepening and it's not the inversion of

16:18

the yield curve that's generally painful

16:20

it's the subsequent rest deepening and

16:24

that's because everybody's starts

16:25

panicking stuff gets broken all the Fine

16:27

China falls off the shelves everybody

16:29

loses their poopsie dupsies and stops

16:32

spending money and then you actually end

16:33

up in a recession this is the two tens

16:35

curve by the way right now and you can

16:38

see how inverted we got just walking

16:40

into the banking crisis ridiculously

16:43

inverted uh and and now you're seeing

16:46

this sort of steepening and it's that

16:48

subsequent up that tends to be very

16:50

painful so that does actually reiterate

16:52

historically what Mike Wilson argues

16:55

here so uh but of course you know stocks

16:58

barely moved last week in some cases

17:02

they actually rallied last week's last

17:05

week and uh Mike Wilson argues that this

17:09

is because we've now quote re-liquified

17:12

the banking system and that money is

17:14

going to flow into the economy for a

17:16

brief period of time but that's not

17:19

going to matter because soon enough that

17:22

is going to lead to the realization that

17:24

wait now the banks have more debt not

17:26

more free money and that's going to make

17:29

their leverage ratios lead to even

17:32

tighter lending standards and then

17:34

earnings basically come down Mike

17:36

Wilson's biggest argument is that

17:38

earnings aren't going to hold up at the

17:39

S P 500 and he says that over and over

17:42

and over again but it's just really

17:44

entertaining to see him lash out because

17:46

he's always lashing out and maybe he'll

17:48

end up being right but he's always

17:50

lashing out because it seems like the

17:52

more he lashes out the more the market

17:54

doesn't actually fall so and since

17:58

obviously I tend to take the bullish

18:00

position at least at this phase in the

18:02

cycle I'm taking the bullish position I

18:04

flip-flop a lot though remember you can

18:05

always follow every one of my flip flops

18:07

by subscribing the channel or using that

18:09

coupon code that expires in two days for

18:11

the Saint Patty's week sale but anyway

18:14

look I mean this is your QQQ right we

18:18

broke the massive downtrend we regularly

18:21

bounce off the 200-day moving average

18:23

from a fib support Short Line if we

18:25

break 311 right here after this next

18:28

fomc meeting that is let's say we get

18:31

our 25 BP that we're expecting and then

18:34

j-pal comes out and he's a little bird

18:37

pecking on the floor like a dove uh and

18:40

and you know he's he's super sad or like

18:43

concerned

18:45

risk assets will probably rally uh I

18:48

mean we're already seeing that in

18:49

Bitcoin but we'll talk about that in a

18:51

little bit but uh you don't actually see

18:53

despite all this banking Madness any

18:55

real pain at least not in the NASDAQ

18:58

over here that could be because so many

19:00

people are just sitting this out on the

19:02

sidelines

19:03

which is fantastic for the people who

19:05

are actually in the market uh and then

19:07

here's your spy even the spy is holding

19:09

up pretty decently so uh somewhat

19:12

somewhat remarkable that that you're

19:14

seeing this sort of behavior in markets

19:16

while at the same time you're having

19:17

such a crisis in the banking sector now

19:21

uh at as all of this is happening I

19:23

thought this was a little bit

19:24

mind-blowing but as all of this is

19:26

happening Credit Suisse apparently uh

19:29

addressed the concerns their staff have

19:31

and are now saying quote there are no

19:34

changes to payroll we will pay salary

19:37

and bonuses we're outstanding as

19:40

previously communicated employees

19:42

salaries and any bonuses that are due

19:44

will still be paid on March 24th per the

19:47

memo well that's two days after the

19:49

expiration of the coupon codes well if

19:51

you work for Credit Suisse and you need

19:53

an extra couple days to get your final

19:55

pay and then join the courses just email

19:57

me at Kevin meet kevin.com but otherwise

20:00

price go up 22nd end of the day 1159

20:04

California time

20:07

so there's the latest on the banking

20:09

crisis it's worth noting what we'd heard

20:10

about yesterday with the fad you watch

20:13

that video obviously that was a big deal

20:15

seeing the FED come out on a Sunday to

20:17

provide more liquidity don't kid

20:19

yourself it is a temporary it I'm

20:22

calling it transitory QE that's what it

20:25

is it's transitory money Printing and

20:28

I'm sure because it's transitory it'll

20:32

almost certainly be permanent

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.