TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Fed'S Disaster is WORSE Than Feared | CRITICAL WARNING

23m 42s4,211 words601 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

you are not going to want to miss the

0:01

information we're talking about in this

0:03

video because this is a total Game

0:06

Changer and it's not what you're

0:08

expecting probably at least see the

0:11

market has rallied 8 days in a row had

0:15

we closed green today we would have had

0:18

nine straight green days in a row

0:21

something that has not happened since a

0:24

market rally in 2004 coming out of the

0:28

do bub collapse well today the rally

0:32

failed its ninth day and the questions

0:34

we have now well come down to a lot of

0:38

problems one what's this Bureau of Labor

0:42

Statistics labor revision everyone's

0:44

talking about are we going into a

0:46

recession or are we in a recession

0:47

where's Kevin on the bare bull scale I

0:49

mean the Market's been going up the last

0:51

eight days so surely he's going to

0:53

flip-flop to Bull right well we're going

0:55

to talk about that in this video is the

0:57

market pricing in any quantitative

0:59

easing or a stimulative Fed at all and

1:03

will the Federal Reserve go with a 50 BP

1:05

cut or frankly has the FED already gone

1:07

too far we're going to talk about all of

1:10

that and much more in this video and boy

1:13

there's some big big things you want to

1:16

take notes on on this one but first I

1:18

have to get it out of the way like this

1:19

stain on the jacket over here it'll wash

1:22

away I've got this million dooll trade

1:25

that I've built up and if you want to

1:27

know exactly why I built it up and what

1:30

it is actually two trades one part and

1:33

another part both of them are equally

1:35

worth over a million dollars and their

1:37

trades for the second half of this year

1:40

they consider them both Hedges and

1:43

frankly a long-term investment they're

1:44

not puts don't worry uh but anyway if

1:47

you want to learn more about those and

1:48

my strategies around those why I'm

1:51

looking at these make sure you're part

1:52

of the courses on building your wealth

1:54

we've got a coupon code expiring this

1:56

Friday for Jackson Hole so it's a

1:59

special aotter Jackson Hole coupon code

2:02

haven't pitched a coupon code in

2:04

probably a couple weeks here one to two

2:06

weeks something like that to all of you

2:07

so just wanted to mention There's an

2:09

opportunity coming up for Jackson Hole

2:11

and that's it for the mention for now

2:13

let's hop on to the content the research

2:15

institute mizuo is nervous about

2:18

employment they see slowing hiring soft

2:21

household employment data softening

2:23

payroll employment and Rising

2:25

unemployment and their question now is

2:28

how much is inflation going to weak and

2:30

how much is the jobs Market going to

2:32

weaken and their answer a lot and a lot

2:36

and their critical takeaway in their

2:39

article was that the Federal Reserve is

2:41

priced right now for a quote decent

2:44

easing cycle that would only take the

2:47

Federal Reserve to the top of the

2:49

neutral end of where the Federal Reserve

2:51

rates might actually end up in the long

2:54

term and this they say is actually

2:57

somewhat problematic I want you to to

3:00

see this I'm going to throw this up on

3:01

screen right here this is a screenshot

3:03

of what they're saying and I wrote on

3:05

the left basically no stimulus priced in

3:09

and I'm not talking about stimulus

3:11

stimulus checks I'm talking about the

3:13

fact that the FED is restrictive right

3:16

now and the market is only pricing in

3:19

the FED going to neutral well if the FED

3:22

needs to go stimulative rates can fall a

3:26

lot further than currently priced and

3:29

and this in their opinion suggests that

3:32

investors should continue to buy backups

3:35

in Market rates now what the heck are

3:37

those well backups and Market rates are

3:40

basically a way of saying hey maybe you

3:42

want to buy treasury bonds or something

3:44

that's going to lock you into higher

3:46

yields because if the FED needs to go to

3:50

well frankly just neutral cool that's

3:53

priced in but if they need to price in

3:55

any amount of easing that hasn't been

3:57

done yet and so on top of this fear

4:00

about the employment cycle rolling over

4:04

we've got big employment data tomorrow

4:06

big employment data tomorrow that quite

4:09

frankly is probably going to show the

4:11

economy is a lot weaker than we had

4:13

originally thought on Benchmark

4:15

revisions this is what they're called

4:17

Bureau of Labor Statistics Benchmark

4:18

revisions they come out at 10:00 a.m. on

4:21

uh the morning of what do we got here

4:23

Wednesday the

4:24

21st Mizu suggests we already have most

4:27

of the information it's not going to be

4:30

a huge surprise that the revision is

4:32

going to be massively to the downside in

4:34

other words we created way fewer jobs

4:37

than we actually were told we created

4:39

under the Biden Administration in the

4:41

last year not a surprise and it's not

4:43

designed to get political it's just the

4:45

way it works except these revisions are

4:47

probably going to be in the magnitude of

4:50

1991 or

4:52

2009 both recessionary periods Goldman

4:56

Sachs thinks the number is going to come

4:57

in around 600,000 to a million Mizu

5:00

thinks the number will come in as high

5:02

as 1.1 million in terms of a negative

5:05

jobs revision so in other words you take

5:07

the total bundle of all the jobs we

5:09

created over the last year and now take

5:11

out up to 1.1 million or nearly a

5:14

100,000 fewer jobs per month that would

5:17

be in line with the weaker household

5:19

survey it's why we keep seeing that

5:20

spread between the payroll survey which

5:22

asks bosses how many employees they have

5:25

and the household survey which asks

5:27

household how like do they have a job or

5:29

not and and those surveys have kind of

5:31

been widening suggesting there's

5:33

something wrong with the data well these

5:35

revisions might finally kill the charade

5:38

at least for now now a lot of people

5:40

think the gig is up or The Jig Is up and

5:43

we're going to see some really bad

5:44

potentially recession fear inducing

5:46

numbers at 7:00 a.m. California time

5:49

tomorrow or 10 a.m. it's interesting it

5:52

gives you 30 minutes of trading right

5:53

before that or 10 a.m. uh Eastern Time

5:57

Goldman though doesn't actually think

5:58

it'll be that bad bad because Goldman

6:00

thinks the downward revision will be

6:02

overstated mostly because it might not

6:04

count all of the work authorized illegal

6:07

immigrants now adding to jobs though I

6:09

think most Americans are going to listen

6:11

to what Goldman said and they're going

6:13

to say bro if we're now relying on

6:15

illegals with work authorization to prop

6:18

up our economy then our economy truly is

6:21

effed but anyway mizuo says that this

6:24

report tomorrow is likely to contribute

6:26

to a downside yield and curve steepening

6:29

risk now I can't give any guarantees I

6:31

have no idea what's going to happen past

6:33

performance doesn't guarantee future

6:34

results but I've got a big trade going

6:36

on this and that's uh my million dooll

6:39

trade so we'll see which way it goes if

6:42

you want to see what it is make sure you

6:43

join uh before tomorrow when that

6:46

release comes out could just go to

6:48

meetkevin.com if you need a bundle

6:49

coupon email us at uh staff

6:51

meetkevin.com this isn't like a YOLO

6:54

trade either where it's like oh yeah

6:56

it's like a Friday call option or some

6:58

YOLO that's going to go to zero this is

7:00

like this is my opinion a real trade but

7:03

anyway since there is one more

7:05

employment report for before Jackson

7:07

Hole on Friday mizuo thinks that the

7:09

Federal Reserve is actually going to

7:10

leave the door open to aggressive easing

7:13

from the fed this kind of aligns with

7:15

what ever core isi suggests which is

7:17

that we might see a Fed suggest a 50

7:20

basis point cut in the September meeting

7:23

especially since the September meeting

7:24

is also a signaling meeting where we get

7:26

the summary of economic projections

7:28

where they could give us a 25 or 50 and

7:32

potentially talk doish about the market

7:33

to really Drive yields down quickly and

7:36

aggressively it's a big trade in that

7:38

you should be seeing it loud and clearly

7:41

but anyway something to watch though is

7:44

the layoff rate okay the layoff rate is

7:48

right now still under one now don't

7:52

worry I know that doesn't really mean

7:53

anything to you right now so I'm going

7:55

to give you history historically the

7:57

layoff rate sits around 1

8:00

.2 with full employment that's your

8:02

layoff rate if hiring keeps falling

8:05

though and then all of a sudden you get

8:07

a normalization of the layoff rate in

8:10

other words hiring Falls and the layoff

8:12

rate Rises just back to normal Mizu

8:16

thinks you could see the unemployment

8:17

rate move sharply higher which would

8:20

move you into a recession notice

8:23

everything even though we've had a good

8:25

week here with lagging data unemployment

8:28

claims you know University of Michigan

8:30

sentiment PPI CPI export prices who

8:34

cares right all of this lagging data the

8:38

leading

8:39

indicators like job openings we're going

8:41

to talk about and some of the other

8:42

things you'll see in this video they're

8:44

actually weakening they make me more

8:46

bearish and there's a reason I haven't

8:48

made an economic video in four or five

8:50

days because I've been reading and

8:51

studying this every single day to put

8:53

this video together to just give you a

8:55

calm put together perspective that's

8:58

hopefully balanced I I know some of this

9:00

sounds negative initially to start with

9:02

but we're going to balance it because

9:03

this I'll show you why this could be

9:05

wrong as well but anyway Mizu says that

9:08

if the labor market weakens it would be

9:10

reasonable to assume that the Federal

9:12

Reserve is going to need to add stimulus

9:15

that is they're going to take rates

9:16

below 3% we're not going to be neutral

9:18

we're going to go way below that and the

9:20

Market's not currently pricing that in

9:23

especially since when you have the

9:25

basically jobs added level sitting

9:27

around 990,000 you're kind of looking at

9:30

periods historically that align with

9:33

either recessions or really soft labor

9:36

markets it's also worth noting that the

9:38

job openings rate that a lot of people

9:41

talk about which I will show you a

9:43

picture of right here because I keep

9:44

seeing it on X people keep posting these

9:47

job openings rates and they say oh the

9:49

last two recessions started with 8 and6

9:52

job Seekers per jobs per per Seeker

9:55

basically in other words you had way

9:57

fewer openings than you had workers well

10:00

right now we're sitting at like 1.2 so

10:02

people are like see we're not in a

10:03

recession yet but there's a problem with

10:05

this chart Publications like I can't

10:08

remember which one it was it was either

10:09

Robo bank or TS Lombard they've

10:11

suggested that the job openings rate may

10:13

be artificially High because companies

10:16

just forget to take down their old and

10:19

stale listings and the web portals

10:21

actually incentivize people not to take

10:24

down the listings because the longer

10:26

those listings are forgotten the more

10:27

profit those companies get and the job

10:30

listing websites are already getting

10:31

smoked because we have such a soft labor

10:33

market right now so they're like no no

10:35

no please don't cancel your listing we

10:37

need the money so in other words this

10:38

line could already be in a recessionary

10:41

level and and we just don't know or see

10:44

it yet because you know a we don't want

10:46

to and and B well frankly we use the

10:49

internet ironically to find jobs a lot

10:52

more today than we did yes again

10:54

ironically then in the dot bubble and in

10:57

08 everybody's got an app now to find a

10:59

job we didn't even have an app store uh

11:02

in I mean in 2008 the app store for

11:04

Apple came out in 2009 I remember it was

11:07

in the summer of 2009 is is hanging out

11:09

at Lauren's

11:11

house anyway uh this this really

11:14

suggests a downside bias to this chart

11:16

on top of that you've got BCA research

11:20

that currently thinks we could be

11:21

pricing in a yearend recession listen to

11:24

this ahead of recessions firms usually

11:27

reduce the pace of hiring

11:29

before they start firing the jol's

11:32

hiring rate is now well below

11:34

pre-pandemic levels see that's a leading

11:37

indicator hires tabulated by these

11:39

various different firms were down 43% in

11:42

the first 7 months of the year relative

11:44

to the same period a year ago folks a

11:47

43% decline from a year ago on top of

11:50

that the job opening rate today is flat

11:52

from its post-pandemic peak of 7.4 to

11:55

4.9% our Global investment strategy team

11:58

highlights the current pace of decline

12:00

in the job openings level at this

12:03

current Pace rather the economy will

12:05

reach the I'm just going to translate

12:07

this to English the bad point in the

12:10

beaver curve and at that point Rising

12:13

unemployment will trigger a negative

12:15

feedback loop self-fulfilling

12:18

culminating in a recession now just like

12:20

in super plain English here when people

12:23

start firing they start firing fast and

12:25

it's no surprise that Muhammad Allan is

12:28

now suggesting that expectations of

12:30

losing one's job is currently at record

12:34

high levels according to the New York

12:36

fed survey going back to

12:38

2014 Now it only goes back to 2014 so I

12:41

don't actually think that one's like

12:42

super super useful but something else

12:45

that is super super useful my opinion is

12:48

considering that well wait a minute what

12:52

could actually be contributing to

12:53

layoffs that has started occurring over

12:56

the last year oh what's this

12:59

Dennis on X brutal company's marketing

13:03

team begins using AI company realizes it

13:06

doesn't need the entire marketing team

13:08

75% of team gets laid

13:11

off these I call them AI enabled layoffs

13:16

where basically what you have are

13:18

companies that start saying okay we're

13:20

not really growing revenues as fast so

13:23

but we need to show our investors growth

13:25

so let's grow EPS in order to grow EPS

13:27

what are we going to do let's just just

13:29

lay people off because then our earnings

13:30

will look higher from our existing book

13:32

of business now we'll talk about

13:35

revenues flattening in just a moment

13:38

that part's still coming but it shows

13:41

you that uhoh yeah if you get a

13:44

self-fulfilling loop it's likely that

13:46

the productivity enhancements we've

13:48

gotten from AI could actually make

13:50

companies more interested in laying off

13:53

other people more rapidly it's not good

13:56

all right so then Mizu on inflation now

14:00

this is a really really interesting one

14:02

so this is a special little chart they

14:05

put together here and I want you to see

14:06

this red arrow right here this red arrow

14:10

points at the green line the red arrow

14:13

suggests that Trend inflation actually

14:16

started declining around the end of

14:19

2021 now this is actually crazy because

14:21

it suggests that if Trend inflation was

14:24

going down then it basically means we

14:27

had these weird little Transit

14:29

hits as to why inflation went up in 2021

14:33

and

14:33

2022 rather than sort of a long-term

14:36

Trend this is critical because a lot of

14:38

people believe we're just going to have

14:39

a second wave of inflation we're

14:40

basically screwed but the reality is if

14:43

we end up having lower Trend inflation

14:45

and all this stuff was truly transitory

14:48

then people are probably really

14:50

misposition positioning themselves and

14:52

they should be positioning themselves

14:54

for uh a recession and for deflation not

14:59

for a second wave of

15:00

inflation anyway take a look at this

15:03

demand inflation is right here where the

15:05

Green Arrow is and you can see that

15:08

demand inflation sits at just under 1%

15:11

uh the left bar left side is is just

15:14

under the 1% there uh but usually we sit

15:17

slightly under the 0% line this means

15:20

that when that blue line continues to

15:23

normalize we might actually see pce

15:26

inflation closer to 1% than 2% this is

15:29

according to Mizu I'm not making this up

15:32

this means the Federal Reserve might

15:34

actually have already overdone it

15:36

inflation might end up closer to 1% and

15:38

we'll be right back at flexible average

15:40

inflation targeting where the fed's

15:41

trying to get inflation back up again

15:43

and then we get to 0% interest rates QE

15:46

and we're right back to the bubble cycle

15:48

except a bunch of people lost all their

15:49

money in the stock market crashed on the

15:51

way down to that cut to

15:55

zero I gu I I don't want to be a bear

15:58

because I I feel like I'm like talking

16:00

down people's portfolios or whatever and

16:02

people are like oh no it's bad it's like

16:04

well as long as you don't stick your

16:06

head in the sand you know have an

16:08

opinion on it it's important uh but you

16:10

know all of this is also consistent with

16:12

what TS Lombard is seeing with European

16:14

inflation as well suggesting that

16:16

shipping rates appear to have peaked

16:17

insurance rates appear to have peaked

16:19

disinflation in core Goods has probably

16:22

reached a bottom but it's probably going

16:23

to stay around there the services uh

16:26

inflation has probably peaked out we

16:28

weaker commodity costs all these things

16:30

basically leading to fading inflationary

16:33

concerns on top of that what you're

16:36

seeing is well quite frankly earnings

16:39

estimates for S&P 500 companies

16:42

plummeting yeah not good look at the

16:44

white line the white line is the stock

16:47

price chart of the S&P

16:49

500 the Orange Line are earnings per

16:53

share projections which are plummeting

16:57

so why is the stock market still going

16:59

up as projections are plummeting fomo

17:03

well I mean that's just a theory I I I

17:04

don't know with certainty but that's

17:06

what some are thinking uh anyway uh you

17:09

know these these issues in total are

17:12

problematic already everything we've

17:14

talked about but I'm just going to add a

17:15

few more things in here startup failures

17:18

have surged by more than 60% in the past

17:20

year on top of that we have the highest

17:23

level of bankruptcies since Q2 2017 and

17:25

the highest quantity of chapter 11

17:28

filings since 2011 in the last 13 years

17:32

that's not good either oops wrong button

17:35

over there that's not good either

17:39

so if only people were potentially

17:43

starting to prepare I mean In fairness

17:45

we did get good news good news on Israel

17:47

Israel and Iran seem to have cooled

17:49

their Jets quite literally a deal with

17:51

Hamas maybe more imminent in strikes uh

17:54

we do have uh very low hedging happening

17:57

right now that could be explaining why

17:59

the market Skyrocket over the last eight

18:01

days put call ratios are at the lowest

18:03

we've seen since July of 2021 suggesting

18:06

that a lot of what we've recently seen

18:08

has been a bit of a short squeeze and

18:10

central banks are starting to stockpile

18:12

gold which might be why gold is over

18:14

$2500 which also kind of makes sense

18:16

because frankly if rates are going to

18:18

get

18:20

cut people think that the value of the

18:22

dollar which I think will fall about 10%

18:25

very soon or more uh will you know

18:28

currencies will lose value and gold

18:31

might preserve its value or if there's a

18:33

recession actually go up substantially

18:35

in value these these are all bad right I

18:39

hate to say this so now on top of all of

18:41

this we did have a foreshadowing of this

18:45

a August 5th crash and I hate saying

18:47

that because it's kind of like oh my

18:49

gosh like there was a warning sign tell

18:51

me what that warning sign is so we can

18:52

watch for new flareups Yeah we actually

18:54

covered it here on YouTube it was the

18:57

spike in the sofa rate that's the

18:59

standard overnight uh rate so for

19:02

funding rate and uh it spiked in earlier

19:06

in July and uh and it sort of you I

19:09

remember making a YouTube video on this

19:11

and I was like hm this signals liquidity

19:13

stress and potentially something bad

19:15

that's about to happen and then we had

19:17

August 5th so now I mean I didn't know

19:20

exactly what was going to happen then

19:21

obviously uh but now it's like hm okay

19:24

now you got my attention to the sofa

19:26

raate I'm going to pay attention to this

19:27

a little bit more now something else

19:29

that's also not great is the US dollar

19:32

now equals roughly as many Japanese Yen

19:35

as it did on August 5th and hedge funds

19:39

seem to be more interested in going

19:41

bullish the Yen which means as we get

19:43

rate cuts the dollar goes down the Yen

19:46

gets bought by hedge funds which I kid

19:49

you not that's literally what's

19:50

happening right now see look hedge funds

19:52

have finally turned net bullish on the

19:53

Japanese Yen so the Yen gets bought so

19:57

Yen goes up dollar gets sold dollar goes

20:00

down what gets

20:03

worse the potential carry

20:06

trade yeah so you you could potentially

20:09

be setting up yet another carry trade

20:11

disaster I I it's just H all of this in

20:15

net is just not good now I'm going to do

20:17

a quick summary of this uh and then I'm

20:20

going to leave you with some closing

20:21

thoughts here because this is a lot of

20:23

information to take in I understand that

20:26

and uh my goal is just to simplify this

20:28

as much as possible uh I do want to

20:30

quickly say that you do have Goldman

20:34

Sachs that gives you a little bit of an

20:36

alternative view I'm sorry it was

20:38

Deutsche Bank not Goldman Sachs Deutsche

20:40

Bank says companies are waiting and

20:42

seeing that yes their customers are

20:45

delaying orders or pushing out or

20:47

deferring orders they're not abandoning

20:49

or canceling those orders and Deutsche

20:51

Bank doesn't see signs of a recession

20:53

yet so this kind of your flip side

20:55

argument that things are just

20:56

normalizing that this is all just part

20:58

of the the noise and part for the course

21:00

and and you would expect all of this

21:02

noise and a

21:04

normalization that's fine and it's

21:06

entirely possible that this could just

21:08

be normalization but let's just say to

21:10

me things feel a lot worse than

21:13

normalization so what are some of my

21:15

bottom lines on all of this well first

21:18

of all maybe check out that stocks and

21:20

sight course and even though I can't

21:22

guarantee you you're going to make money

21:23

on every single trade or idea at least

21:26

you know where my head is so when you

21:28

hear or see data like this you could

21:30

look around and say okay well how is

21:32

Kevin positioning how are other people

21:34

positioning and then decide for yourself

21:36

do I want to do the opposite of Kevin do

21:38

I want to do something similar to that

21:39

or something different but take some

21:41

inspiration from it's none of this

21:43

personalized Financial advice it's just

21:45

designed to give perspective so bottom

21:48

line I'm a 2.9 on the bare bull scale

21:51

and honestly it kind of starting to lean

21:53

down not up I know it sucks to be a bear

21:56

when markets are going up

21:59

but and I mean last week's data was nice

22:01

but the anchor here is still heavily in

22:04

recessionary water mostly thanks to

22:06

declining leading indicators on jobs

22:09

declining growth Revenue expectations

22:11

we've seen those turn flat AI enabled

22:14

job firings to boost DPS and plummeting

22:16

job openings and higher rates when the

22:19

joblessness hits it'll hit fast first

22:22

slowly and then all at once the faster

22:25

the Federal Reserve can react great but

22:27

remember when the FED hit us with

22:29

interest rate increases there was a lag

22:32

what do you think there's going to be on

22:33

the way down another lag good luck I

22:38

love you all and I wish you the best

22:40

these things that you told us here I

22:41

feel like nobody else knows about this

22:43

we'll we'll try a little advertising and

22:45

see it Go congratulations man you have

22:46

done so much people love you people look

22:48

up to you Kevin PA there financial

22:50

analyst and YouTuber meet Kevin always

22:53

great to get your

22:54

take even though I'm a licensed

22:56

financial adviser licensed real estate

22:57

broker and becoming a stock broker this

22:58

video is not personalized advice for you

23:00

it is not tax legal or otherwise

23:02

personalized advice tailor to you this

23:04

video provides generalized perspective

23:05

information and commentary any third-

23:07

party content I show shall not be deemed

23:09

endorsed by me this video is not and

23:11

shall never be deemed reasonably

23:12

sufficient information for the purposes

23:14

of evaluating a security or investment

23:15

decision any links or promoted products

23:17

are either paid affiliations or products

23:19

or Services we may benefit from I also

23:21

personally operate and actively managed

23:22

ETF I may personally hold or otherwise

23:25

hold long or short positions in various

23:27

Securities potentially including those

23:28

mentioned in this video however I have

23:30

no relationship to any issuer other than

23:32

house act nor am I presently acting as a

23:34

market maker make sure if you're

23:35

considering investing in house act to

23:36

always read the PPM at house.com

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.