schumer shutdown is worsening
FULL TRANSCRIPT
if they're trying their best to distract
the American people from the simple fact
that they've chosen a partisan fight so
that they can prove to their Marxist
rising base in the De Democrat party
that they're willing to fight Trump and
Republicans. There is no objective truth
to everything he said there. The
Republicans have already said we were
going to have thoughtful conversations,
deliberation, and debate about
continuing the CO era Obamacare
subsidies because they don't expire
until December 31st. They're trying to
pretend like that's a September issue.
It never was.
>> The president himself offered to Chuck
Schumer.
>> The reason it is an issue now is because
renewal pricing gets set in October for
renewals that begin in November
for insurance plans that do expire
December 31st for the year of 2026.
That's why it is an issue now. So here
Mike Johnson is gaslighting the
expiration of these healthc care
subsidies,
arguing it's not an issue now. It
actually is an issue now. Now if you
don't want to extend them, then have
that debate and decide that. But don't
pretend it's not an issue now. Hakee
Jeff in the Oval Office when I and
Leader Thun were sitting next to him
that he would have that that thoughtful
debate that that is for tomorrow as soon
as we get the government open so that
everybody can come in and do that.
There's hundreds of ideas on how to
>> and you know what's going to happen as
soon as the government reopens.
Republicans are just going to go on a
vacation. Like they're not going to
actually do anything
>> do it. It was not appropriate or
possible for that to be resolved in a
continuing resolution.
>> What about his issue though that open
enrollment starts in November. People
are already getting notices about what
they may pay. I mean that's something
that's got to be resolved before
>> Yes. And they're eating up the clock in
the month of October. They shut the
government down October 1st. We had
always been counting on using these four
weeks in October to to finish up those
discussions. The greatity is
>> well, you know, we had October to talk
about healthcare, but since you shut the
government down, I guess we're never
going to get to it. That's the MO all
along. Come on, man.
>> It is they themselves that are doing it.
And Shannon, we cannot lose the the
simple fact that their counter proposal
to fund the government was $1.5 trillion
in new spending. As you noted, uh they
wanted to give money back for the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting and
all sorts of things. and they wanted to
claw back the elimination of fraud,
waste, and abuse that we took out of
Medicaid to make it work better. And the
$50 billion that Republicans put into
the law to prop up rural hospitals. What
they're saying today makes no sense.
>> Well, he does talk about the fact, and
we know that there have been rural
hospitals that have closed. Um, that's
happened here in the Virginia area and
beyond. So what about that and his
contention that a lot of people will be
kicked off Medicaid and yes people talk
about waste fraud and abuse but there's
real concern by some analyses that there
will be other people that may qualify in
some way that are going to risk you know
losing kind of healthcare coverage um
that the leader is talking about there
>> so much to be said there the rural
hospitals that are in trouble right now
are not because of Republican policies
this this is the legacy of what has
happened under Obamacare and you just
heard the leader of the Democrats in the
house acknowledge that Obamacare is
unaffordable When they passed it into
law in 2010, they promised us it was
going to make healthcare more
affordable. They put it in the name of
the law. It did exactly the opposite.
Premiums have ri risen exponentially
since 2010 and they're not affordable.
It was never designed to be affordable.
Republicans are the party that are
fixing healthcare. We just demonstrated
that in the one big beautiful bill, the
working families tax cut. We put in
reforms to Medicaid, as I mentioned,
that cut out fraud, waste, and abuse.
got ineligible recipients off of the
program and it's brought down the cost
and made the resources spread uh more
broadly to the people who actually need
it. US citizens who are the abled,
disabled, the elderly and young pregnant
women, those kinds of folks who are who
are the the people who are intended for
that program to help. We're shoring up
the program. We're fixing healthcare.
Obamacare is what broke it.
>> So, let's get back to those subsidies
for Obamacare. Um he mentioned
Congresswoman Marjgery Taylor Green, a
Republican. There are other Republicans
who are raising alarm. Here's what she
said in part on X. I'm absolutely
disgusted that health insurance premiums
will double if the tax credits expire
this year. Not a single Republican in
leadership talked to us about this or
has given us a plan to help Americans
deal with their
>> of course cuz there was no plan to ever
discuss healthcare. The whole MMO of
this shutdown has been shut it down so
we could give Trump the opportunity to
unleash JD Vance to go on TV every day
and tell you how this is the Democrat's
fault. It's a Schumer shutdown and then
send in Mr. Vote Russ Vote to go lay
people off as the grim reaper instead of
as is typical. We've had 20 shutdowns
since 1976. Typically in a shutdown, we
furlow people. We don't pay them, but
then as soon as we unshut down, which
the longest shutdown was 35 days, we pay
them. Now we're literally firing people.
And we're firing at people at the
Department of Education, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, the CDC.
Although apparently now the White House
is saying, "Oh, we accidentally filed
fired the wrong people at the CDC."
Which sounds a whole lot like what was
happening with Elon Musk. Oh, you know,
this week it's measles staff
accidentally get fired
in April or March or February under El,
oh, we accidentally screwed up Ebola.
It's like, oh, oh, great. But there was
there's no plan here to ever talk about
healthcare. The plan is to fulfill what
Donald Trump ran on, which is shrink
government. And that's what's happening.
And a lot of people are saying, "Hey,
that's what I voted for. I voted for
drain the swamp. drain the government.
It's what we're getting.
>> Health insurance premiums, she says,
again, doubling. So, what is the
guidance from you, the leader of this
party?
>> Yeah, I had a thoughtful conversation
with my friend Marjorie Taylor Green on
the phone the other night, a couple
nights ago to to uh inform her that
there are many Republicans in Congress
that have been working around the clock
on this. They're on the committees of
jurisdiction that deal with this. Uh
Marjorie doesn't serve on those
committees, so I offered to have her
come into the room and be a part of that
discussion if indeed she wants to do
that. There has been a lot of work done
on this. We have hundreds of ideas
literally on the
>> which is fine. Like remember the goal of
a politician is to tell you, oh, we have
teams of people working on this, but
we're actually getting nothing done
because we know that nothing is going to
get done because the government shut
down. We're just going to end up blaming
Democrats on it. So it's it's
gaslighting
>> the table to fix healthcare to make it
more affordable for the American people
to make access more available and to in
increase the quality of care. There's a
lot that can be done, but you have to
build consensus in a large deliberative
public body like this. And again, what
they're saying right now, the reason
they're talking about healthcare is
because they're trying to create a
distraction. We have voted eight times
to pay the troops, pay TSA agents,
border patrol agents, you know,
everybody serving in the federal
government and to make sure these
services are provided for veterans and
and the elderly, disabled who need them
so much. Eight times now, Democrats in
Congress have voted to close the
government. We're on day 10. It's real
pain for real people and they seem not
to care.
>> So, you mentioned the troops. Let's talk
about that because the president has now
said he's ordering Secretary Hegth to
find Pentagon money to pay this week so
that none of our active duty folks will
miss. And I think all Americans Remember
the sales pitch is drain the swamp. But
what it really is is drain the part of
the government you don't like and then
prop up the other part of the government
like the insider trading arm or the you
know well actually probably that and
tech tax cut arm
>> that is a priority. So Democrats say on
Friday they tried to offer up a measure
on the house floor that would have kept
active duty troops paid during any kind
of shutdown. They do have at least one
Republican signature on it making it
bipartisan. Um Politico reports this
though. The presiding Republican
Representative Mike Boston of Illinois
gave a brief pro-form session to a close
before representative Sarah McElver. She
is the Democrat trying to do this from
Maryland could make a procedural move to
try to pass the legislation by unanimous
consent. Politico says Congressman Boss
was working on your guidance. So why not
allow a standalone measure for troops?
because it's unnecessary because we
already voted to pay the troops on
September 19th. We have a chart that we
used at our press conference showing
every time the Republicans have voted to
pay the troops and the Democrats every
time voted no. We did it in the House
September 19th over 3 weeks ago sent it
to the Senate and now seven different
times the Democrats in the Senate, all
but three, have voted not to pay the
troops. So the ball is in the Senate's
court. The House has done its job and
that's what Chairman Bost was referring
to there. that Democrat who tried to
bring that resolution on the floor voted
against.
>> Somebody says, "Why not vote on a
continuation?" The whole reason Dems
aren't voting, and I'm not saying it's
right or wrong, the whole reason Dems
aren't voting on a continuation is
because it just kicks the can down the
road for 30 days. And now we're in the
middle of healthcare enrollment periods
and you don't actually end up getting a
guarantee that any of the issues were
going to get solved that Democrats are
advocating for such as making sure that
the Obama era healthcare subsidies
remain intact so people's health
insurance premiums don't increase 33 to
100%. Which a lot of people are already
getting renewal notices that their
health insurance premiums are going to
skyrocket 33 to 100%. Especially during
a time where the consumer is really
suffering. The lower and middle class
Americans are getting destroyed by this
economy and the people who are getting
rich are the people who are already
rich. Uh the wealthiest corporations and
the wealthiest Americans are doing
really really well. The people exposed
to assets uh stocks whatever. But the
core of the economy is suffering. AI
certainly doesn't help them. So the idea
is, you know, hey, like let's wait and
and maybe leverage the shutdown to try
to get the poorer Americans who need
help supportive. Now then, of course,
the Republicans are branding this as,
oh, well, you're just trying to get
healthcare for illegals. That's Gavin
Newsome's fault. I want to be crystal
clear about that because the federal
government does not authorize Medicaid
funding, which is medical payment, which
are medical payments for poor
individuals to go to undocumented
immigrants or to illegals. Uh however,
states like California go ma monkey see
no evil. Here's the money to poor people
for Medicaid and then of course if
illegal immigrants get in that line,
yes, technically some of that money
flows to illegals. Now on the flip side
though, the counterargument to that is
California is a donor state, which means
California funds the federal government
more so than it takes. So then is money
actually really flowing to illegals? Who
knows? But you could see like when you
actually look at that context, it's like
ah this isn't this is not that crystal
clear. There's so much gaslighting when
you hear just the Democrats or just the
Republicans. But it is one of the
reasons why China is making fun of us
right now. You know, China is massively
making fun of us in this because China's
like see this is how uh a two-party
system fails. This is why we only have
one party in China, the Chinese the the
the China Chinese Communist Party, the
CCP, right? They're using this as an
opportunity to manipulate the world to
go, "Look how lame America is. They
can't get anything done. Look how the
stalemates block them from getting
investments in robotics or rare earths
or things done with their military. They
can't even get healthcare soft. What an
embarrassment." Mind you, that is
technically a feature of the American
system of government. Stalemates,
stalemates were designed in part by the
founding fathers to make it so that our
government really, even in times where
one party is heavily in power of the
three branches of government or the
well, I mean, you could argue three
branches of government right now because
the Supreme Court is so Republican, but
even when the government is is, you
know, controlled by one party, there's
still an opportunity for the other side
to hold progress up, which is what
you're getting with Democrats right now.
The I the whole premise of that is that
the founding fathers didn't want
government to get steamrolled by one
party which to some extent a lot of
extent is really happening by Trump
right now. Uh especially with the power
of the courts I mean we'll talk about
this in just a moment but um the
founding fathers didn't want that. They
wanted stalemates because they wanted
government to only actually operate when
it needed to because by design it would
then keep government smaller. That's why
we had bipartisan support for the first
COVID measures under Trump, the first
$1,200 stimulus check, for example,
because it was an emergency and oh my
gosh, what a surprise. All the the, you
know, politicians got together. But I
always think this chart is really
interesting. It's this this chart of um
how often justices voted voted for each
administration. Uh, and it's so super
clear that I keep this on my desk
because I think it's so valuable because
as a child I I thought that, you know,
um, people in the Supreme Court should
be not politically biased. But then when
you actually look at their voting
records, you see that Kagan, soayor, and
Jackson all vote for Biden policies 77
to 88% of the time and vote against
Trump policies. Uh, you know, well, they
vote for Trump policies 0 to 26% of the
time. Whereas on the flip side, you get
Alto Gorsuch, Kavanaaugh, and Thomas who
vote for Biden policies 18 to 41% of the
time and vote for Trump policies 89 to
95% of the time. So clearly there's even
political bias in our justice system,
which sort of just like breaks the mold
of like our childhood impressions that
oh, we're supposed to have an unbiased
and fair justice system. We don't. Hence
paying the troops. Go look at the
record. every single one of them and
only one Democrat in the House voted to
pay the troops and that vote happened
three weeks ago.
>> So, I want to get back to the optics of
this because we heard um or we saw what
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer
said about this is getting better for
them every day. I want to play a little
bit of what he said about why you guys
are going to get blamed for this. Here's
what he said.
>> Republicans have the White House. They
control the House and the Senate. So
when people are laid off, when people
are not paid, when people are not
getting back pay, they know it's the
Republicans trying to do it even though
they're using it to try and bully us.
>> They think the polling is on their side.
The American people are going to hold
you responsible.
>> Chuck Schumer is incapable of telling
the truth right now. I mean, he's been
in in Congress for 44 years, Shannon. I
mean, almost half a century. He knows
this is basic civics. Every eighth grade
civic student can can point out the
fallacy in what he just said. It
requires 60 votes in the Senate to get
this through. We only have 53
Republicans. We've got to have a
handful.
>> Yeah. Every eighth grader might know
that, but what most eighth graders don't
know is that historically during
shutdowns, both sides provide some form
of give. This is a very rare shutdown
where you're getting no give from the
Republicans. The Republicans aren't
throwing in any additional rider to give
Democrats a bone. Usually, I mean, flip
side, true. when you have Democrats uh
and they're in control and there's a
shutdown. They give stuff to the
Republicans to keep bribing basically
Republicans to come on their side to get
60 votes. Republicans here are trying to
do that with Democrats, but they're not
giving anything. So, yeah, there's
hostage taking shaking, but that's the
whole point. Like that's how government
works to get stuff done. It's, you know,
you give a little then you get a vote,
you give a little more, you get another
vote. Uh and that's how you end up
getting things done. uh poly market
right now is suggesting that uh will
Congress pass a funding bill by dot dot
dot 2% chance by October 15th which
would be in two days so we're not going
anywhere by Halloween only 31% chance
and by November 30th 82% chance so it
looks like the markets seem to be
betting that we're going to get a
funding bill done in November
uh and almost markets are guaranteed
that we're not going to get anything
done over the next few days looks like
we'll be going into a creepy Halloween
huh
>> of Democrats and the Senate who apply
common sense and agree to reopen.
>> Somebody says you trust a 44y old
politician versus Trump who isn't a
politician. No. See, this is the problem
is people hear these like zingers from
Mike Johnson and they don't understand
that that actually has nothing uh to do
uh with
the question he was asked. He was asked
about the shutdown and whether or not
Republicans would take blame. and his
answer was, "Well, Schumer's been in the
business for 44 years." Okay, first of
all, that's a total misdirection. It's a
red herring. It has literally nothing to
do with you answering whether or not
you're going to take blame. And then
this person in the comments eats that up
hook, line, and sinker and tries to
suggest that Trump is not a politician.
You got to be kidding me, dude. Trump
was the for like Trump was the president
for four years and then he spent four
more years bitching about how he wasn't
the president for four years and then
now he's president again. So we're
talking about at least nine years of
being a politician. Nobody knows
politics better than Trump. And this
idea that he's a businessman,
there are a lot of people in politics
who are businessmen, but Donald Trump is
hands down a politician
now. this idea, but but Trump is
different. Yeah, you're right. We have
the most corruption in the White House
we've ever had before. Oh,
>> the government so that we can continue
all these discussions. As you pointed
out to Hakeem Jeff, this is a clean
continuing resolution. What that means
for folks back home is it's exactly the
same levels of spending. By the way,
it's Biden era policies and spending,
which we loathe, but we're trying to get
through the appropriations process to
change that and fix it for the country.
and they ran out of time because the end
of the fiscal year, September 30th, we
just need seven more weeks to finish it.
And right now, they're eating up the
clock. They're doing this for political
cover. Chuck Schumer, when he voted for
the exact same measure back in March,
took a lot of heat from the left of his
party, and he doesn't want to sustain
that any longer. So, he's doing this and
inflicting pain for his own selfish
reasons.
>> Well, we have not brokered an end to the
shutdown here on Fox News Study this
morning.
>> I'm a peacemaker. I wish we could.
>> We are glad to hear from both sides. We
appreciate your time and we'll watch and
wait as the American people look. I'm a
peacemaker. Like honestly, how look
listen listen how do you know a
politician is lying when their lips are
moving? Somebody here in the chat says
Kevin was never this vocal on politics
when Biden was in office. You know
people say this and they are so damn
blind. Go back to my videos. I was the
first YouTuber to call on Biden to step
down. The second he walked out on that
stage. I muted my mic and said, "This
guy needs to step down. He's done. This
is horrible." When that speech was done,
that that debate was done. I was the
first person to make a whole video on
how Biden needs to step down. And guess
what the comments were then? Oh my gosh,
Kevin was never this hard on Trump when
Trump was in office. Kevin's being so
mean to Biden. Man, suck a fat one,
dude. You're so blind, leaving stupid,
dumb, uneducated comments. It makes you
look dumb because I do my best to be
neutral and provide neutral perspective
and then you get these jackasses that
try to write these zingers and they're
so uneducated makes them look like
clowns.
>> Why not advertise these things that you
told us here? I feel like nobody else
knows about this.
>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and
see how it goes.
>> Congratulations, man. You have done so
much. People love you. People look up to
you.
>> Kevin Praath there, financial analyst
and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great
to get your take.
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.