TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Fed's Worst Nightmare.

14m 37s2,493 words373 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

now we got to talk about the wage price

0:02

spiral and the potential of a wage price

0:05

spiral continuing remember a wage price

0:08

spiral is the worst thing that you could

0:10

experience because it leads the Federal

0:12

Reserve to have to force a deep and

0:15

dirty recession they will smack us up

0:17

beside the head the dirtiest with the

0:19

dirtiest smack and dirtiest nasty sticky

0:22

hand you could ever imagine you don't

0:24

want a wage price spiral it's very

0:26

important to remember what you want is

0:28

you want people to build their wealth

0:30

and incomes over time ideally people

0:32

build their income slightly due to

0:35

inflation slight increase to year over

0:37

year but mostly due to providing more

0:39

value to wherever they are providing

0:41

their labor that is good healthy wage

0:44

growth we want people to make more money

0:46

over time to offset slide inflation but

0:49

we also want people to make more money

0:50

when they provide more value that is the

0:52

American way nobody is suggesting that

0:55

we don't want people to make more money

0:56

but what we don't want is the growth of

1:00

wages to be so rapid that all of a

1:03

sudden we create unsustained inflation

1:05

where people are being paid and

1:07

compensated substantially more for

1:09

working less or not working at all a

1:11

wage price spiral can then ensue which

1:14

leads to a nasty depression or deep

1:17

recession much like what we saw in the

1:19

early 1980s when Paul volcker had to

1:22

raise interest rates to 20 percent to

1:25

crush the wage price spiral and that led

1:28

to a lot of layoffs remember the goal of

1:32

investing and the goal of economies and

1:34

capitalism and government is to operate

1:36

in the mean we don't want a government

1:38

that has their heads completely in the

1:40

sand and only does one thing we want a

1:42

government that operates in the middle

1:43

much like we want wage growth to be fair

1:46

and reasonable and in the middle we

1:48

don't want extremely high wage growth

1:50

because that could lead to a wage price

1:51

spiral and then job loss we don't want

1:53

really low wage growth because that

1:55

means people are falling behind and

1:56

suffering so where do we stand today on

1:59

wage inflation and what are the odds of

2:03

wage inflation potentially falling well

2:06

this is very very important and Goldman

2:08

Sachs has just released a piece on three

2:11

leading indicators of what caused

2:14

inflation in wages and where those

2:16

indicators are going and we're going to

2:18

go through exactly this Goldman Sachs

2:21

piece to see what their thesis is now

2:23

remember if you like my perspective make

2:25

sure you join me in the course member

2:26

live streams every day the market is

2:28

open or on the weekend for the elite

2:29

Hustlers courses on Saturday to build

2:31

your income as an employee or as an

2:34

entrepreneur but Monday through Fridays

2:37

we do the course member live stream

2:38

where we do fundamental analysis on real

2:40

estate and investing we talk investing

2:41

Trends and ideas and volatility and

2:44

charting you name it also it's an

2:46

opportunity to answer q a I also

2:48

encourage you to check out the lectures

2:49

on building your wealth that come with

2:51

those course member live streams whether

2:52

it's the zero millionaire real estate

2:54

investing course or the stocks and site

2:56

course we've got a flash sale expiring

2:58

on investor day which is tomorrow

3:00

all right let's take a look here so

3:02

number one inflation expectations

3:04

elevated inflation and inflation

3:06

expectations over the last year likely

3:08

drove workers to bargain for higher

3:10

wages to make up for lost purchasing

3:12

power it's difficult to identify the

3:14

effect of inflation expectations on wage

3:16

growth as there is no way to disentangle

3:18

the true inflationary pressures on wage

3:20

growth but basically leading indicators

3:23

suggest that when we look at one year

3:26

inflation Expectations by the consumer

3:28

which this is not what's estimated by

3:31

the bond market like break evens but

3:33

rather we look to the one-year inflation

3:36

expectations for the University of

3:38

Michigan

3:39

when we look to short-term inflationary

3:42

expectations we could see that if it's

3:46

possible that wages increase because

3:49

consumer expectations of inflation were

3:52

Rising therefore leading to them to in

3:54

aggregate demand higher wages then we

3:57

should be able to look at that one year

3:58

inflation expectation chart and also say

4:01

that number one most important inflation

4:05

expectations are starting to plummet

4:07

that plummeting of inflation

4:09

expectations could reduce that upward

4:12

wage pressure that we are seeing from

4:14

individuals

4:15

individuals moving to lower inflation

4:19

expectations could actually help us see

4:22

a reduction in wage inflation back to

4:27

normalcy in English this is very good

4:30

news we have one large indicator here

4:33

out of the three indicators we're going

4:35

to look at suggesting that wage

4:37

inflation is likely to decline neither

4:40

of the three wage indicators that we are

4:42

going to look at here have anything to

4:44

do with Supply chains or other of the

4:48

inflationary impacts this is solely on

4:49

wages and inflation expectations falling

4:52

could beget less wage inflationary

4:56

pressure per Goldman Sachs and that is

4:59

fantastic this is again not to say we

5:02

don't want people to make more money or

5:04

build their wealth too many people who

5:06

try to put on a political lens and go oh

5:09

you just want people to make this money

5:10

wrong we want people to make more money

5:13

especially people who provide more value

5:15

because that's the smart way to provide

5:17

more money or provide to build your

5:19

wealth because if you don't provide more

5:20

value and you just demand more wage

5:22

increases you'll end up getting replaced

5:24

by a robot or a chat bot when you get

5:26

fired by somebody who's willing to work

5:28

harder that's very important you might

5:30

temporarily win working the same amount

5:32

and getting paid more but you'll never

5:34

win in the long run it's very important

5:36

that you always provide more value but

5:38

when it comes to inflation expectations

5:39

on the market it's very clear that

5:41

Goldman Sachs tells us on a one out of

5:43

at least one out of their three

5:45

indicators is suggesting that wage

5:47

disinflation is coming it might take

5:49

time it might take patience but it is

5:51

obvious the inflation leading indicators

5:54

are suggesting that wage growth is going

5:57

to moderate further number two pandemic

6:01

related normalization as we pointed out

6:03

last year covid related labor market

6:05

policies pandemic bonuses and coveted

6:07

related labor market disruptions likely

6:09

contributed to elevated wage growth in

6:11

2021 and early 2022 specifically

6:14

temporary fiscal measure during the

6:16

pandemic especially the enhanced

6:17

unemployment benefits in the extended

6:19

and expanded child tax credit likely led

6:22

to very strong wage gains gains from

6:25

that last summer through last winter in

6:27

low-paid sectors where fiscal transfers

6:29

replaced a large share of normal wages

6:31

in addition many companies appear to

6:33

have offered workers larger than usual

6:36

pay increases as compensation for

6:38

pandemic hardship and to incentivize

6:40

them to resume normal work practices

6:44

in English maybe it was a bad idea to

6:47

pay people four to six hundred dollars a

6:50

week to stay at home and do nothing

6:52

because that meant businesses who relied

6:54

on labor had to pay substantially more

6:57

money to get people back to work and

6:59

even after those benefits went away

7:01

because of the expanded child tax

7:03

credits which were still running

7:05

substantially in 2022 maybe all of a

7:09

sudden you're out or the stimulus checks

7:11

that California stupidly sent out in

7:13

October of 2022 maybe you actually just

7:16

replenished the excess savings that

7:18

people had and still have today making

7:21

them less likely to return to work

7:23

leading to massive wage inflation and

7:25

worker shortages now thankfully that

7:28

trend is finally turning around

7:29

companies like Chipotle and Starbucks

7:31

are suggesting it's easier to hire and

7:33

retain workers less turnover easier to

7:35

find people cloudflare had 1300 job

7:38

openings in 2022 guess how many

7:40

applications they receive out of 1300

7:43

openings 400

7:46

000 applications Uber is seeing a 37

7:49

increase in the number available

7:50

available drivers Lyft is seeing an

7:53

extreme increase in the amount of

7:55

available drivers and so all of a sudden

7:57

labor is now chasing fewer available

8:00

jobs however this takes a while to

8:03

actually show up in our data it's going

8:05

to take a while to see this

8:07

disinflationary impetus thanks to our

8:09

incompetent government having spent as

8:11

much money as they did supporting people

8:14

for doing nothing now I'm not saying

8:16

that was a bad thing I was a big fan of

8:20

breaking down all of the ways that you

8:22

could make money from the government

8:23

because even if they're stupid I'm happy

8:26

to make sure you can take advantage of

8:27

those aspects but what I don't want you

8:30

to do today is be blind to think that uh

8:33

oh we are going into a wage price spiral

8:35

so far the indicators of that are

8:37

absolutely no inflation from a wage

8:41

point of view is absolutely pointing in

8:43

a disinflationary direction how long it

8:45

takes is the real question but the

8:47

Federal Reserve is paying attention to

8:49

this so number one wage expectation

8:52

inflation declining we see the chart

8:54

here not only that but as we normalize

8:57

away from these pandemic support

8:58

programs which seriously we're still

9:01

going on under 10 inflation five months

9:04

ago basically near 10 inflation five

9:06

months ago in California and in other

9:08

parts of the country those are finally

9:10

starting to normalize it's insane you

9:13

should send a letter to Gavin Newsom and

9:15

go you dumb idiot you made inflation

9:17

worse when it already was nine percent

9:20

you dumb nut but that's okay because we

9:23

know he's an idiot but he's an idiot

9:24

who'll probably end up running for

9:26

office in the white house one day and

9:28

hopefully you realize that during the

9:30

highest inflation he sets stimulus

9:32

checks to people making up to five

9:34

hundred thousand dollars to buy votes

9:36

and now what's California Oh California

9:39

is going into potentially a large budget

9:42

deficit oh wow no surprise the taxpayers

9:46

who were actually making money are

9:48

fleeing the state and they're leaving to

9:50

different areas now all of a sudden

9:53

paying the government less money and so

9:55

what do you actually have Gavin Newsom

9:57

predicting a massive budget surplus but

9:59

instead of actually getting a surplus

10:01

what we actually end up having is a

10:04

projected deficit for California of 22.5

10:07

billion dollars striking downturn from

10:11

the surplus of last year thanks to not

10:13

only coveted money that the government

10:14

massively double counted in political

10:16

rallies but also massive capital gains

10:20

as the biggest winners of the covet

10:22

handouts ended up being wealthier people

10:24

in the form of ridiculously expensive

10:27

IPOs stock surges and real estate

10:30

appreciation which led to massive and

10:32

temporary surges in capital gains in

10:35

California

10:36

now I've got to continue here with

10:38

Goldman Sachs third warning on wage

10:42

disinflation this is very important so

10:45

what is the third warning well the third

10:48

warning here is the one that's lagging

10:51

the most and is taking this the longest

10:53

amount of time to normalize but it has

10:55

to do with the jobs worker Gap we're

10:58

still at the highest the second highest

11:00

level in the gap between the amount of

11:03

job openings and the workers who are

11:04

taking those jobs however Goldman Sachs

11:07

makes it very clear it takes a long time

11:10

for this Gap to actually affect the wage

11:13

rate and fortunately if we actually if

11:15

we ignore the government's measure of

11:17

the job openings and labor turnover

11:19

index the jolts report we actually look

11:22

at the alternative jobs openings data

11:25

which is brought to you by like the real

11:28

economy rather than the government's

11:29

crazy adjusted data we can look at

11:32

indeed.com and Linked UP job openings

11:35

what we do take a look at this what do

11:39

we see ah how interesting a very clear

11:42

downtrend in that light blue line of the

11:45

actual and alternative job openings data

11:49

so while unfortunately this is moving

11:51

down very slowly it gives workers plenty

11:54

of an opportunity to sort of reshift to

11:57

the job and workplace and in the

11:58

environment they actually want to be in

12:00

for the long term but this downtrend is

12:03

really important to pay attention to

12:05

because it is yet the third indicator

12:07

that massive wage disinflation is coming

12:11

remember disinflation is the decline in

12:14

the inflation rate and this massive

12:16

disinflation coming and and all three of

12:19

these aspects of massive wage

12:20

disinflation make it very very clear

12:23

that yes even though it's going to take

12:25

months to get these declines actually

12:28

showing up in real data it's very clear

12:30

that three out of three of the

12:32

indicators that Goldman Sachs is looking

12:34

at for the risk of wage price spiral are

12:38

clearly telling us no wages are not

12:42

going to cause a wage price spiral

12:44

anyone betting on a wage price spiral is

12:46

not paying attention to the data they're

12:48

paying attention to lagging and

12:50

anecdotal reports or massively

12:52

seasonally adjusted reports like the

12:54

Bureau of Labor Statistics report which

12:56

is seriously just looking in the

12:57

rearview mirror so this is good news

13:00

this is bullish news now it doesn't mean

13:02

we want to YOLO and be crazy not bet on

13:04

volatility in the short term I've said

13:06

it before and I'll say it again I

13:08

believe we are in a Nike Swoosh recovery

13:10

that is going to be very volatile now

13:12

unfortunately when people hear me say

13:13

Nike Swoosh recovery they they literally

13:16

just think to themselves okay Nike

13:18

Swoosh recovery down fast oops down fast

13:21

and up slower got it but they're not

13:24

listening to me what I say it's going to

13:25

be very very volatile and very bumpy I

13:29

do think we're going to continue to

13:30

Trend up at this point I'm not

13:32

absolutely saying we won't hit a lower

13:34

leg that's possible I just think it's

13:37

unlikely based on the leading data that

13:39

we have and the Federal Reserve is not

13:41

blind to the leading data as much as

13:44

they might seem that way in my opinion

13:46

the Federal Reserve is putting on an act

13:48

of not paying attention towards the

13:50

leading data because they want to keep

13:53

the 10-year treasury yield High because

13:56

that crushes real estate and by crushing

13:59

real estate you crush demand and that's

14:02

what they want to do to make sure that

14:03

real estate or that Services inflation

14:06

inflation in general stays anchored in

14:09

inflation expectations stay anchored but

14:11

you even have one of the Bears like

14:13

Loretta Mester you turning on this idea

14:16

that oh yeah we're definitely going for

14:18

50 BP

14:19

she quickly u-turned on that after

14:22

widely being quoted as being interested

14:24

in 50 BP she clarified that away so

14:27

quickly but very few people are paying

14:29

attention to it but I am and I hope

14:32

that's why you continue to subscribe

14:33

support the channel and share the videos

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.