Trump **JUST** Filed Epstein Lawsuit | Major PROBLEMS

Well, it's official. As promised, Donald

Trump has filed a lawsuit against the

Wall Street Journal, which is honestly

quite remarkable speed. The complaint

was filed in Miami District Court. A

copy of the complaint is not yet

available. Donald Trump is filing a

lawsuit for liel, which is basically the

written form of slander, meaning that a

publication published something that was

untrue.

The best defense to the Wall Street

Journal for this is going to be the

truth. If the Wall Street Journal can

say this is where we got the

information, here is a copy of it. Now

the burden shifts to Donald Trump to

prove that that information is false or

somehow fabricated, which could be

difficult given that a liel lawsuit

would not automatically pierce the

journalistic privilege of where the

information came from. see the

information or documentation that the

Wall Street Journal has probably has to

be enough to withstand this type of

lawsuit given that the Wall Street

Journal was clearly threatened by Donald

Trump that he was going to sue. And

publications know the best defense to a

liel lawsuit or slander lawsuit if you

speak it on radio or TV is the truth. If

you talk about the truth or you opine

about the truth, you have the first

amendment right to do that. If you

actually have documentation that came

from a Maxwell related source or an

Epstein source or something that shows

this is your signature, then it's going

to be difficult for Donald Trump to

prove that that information was false.

But that's going to be what this case is

about. And again, piercing that that

sort of journalistic privilege of where

the the items or the book or the copies

came from is going to be the hardest

part. Given that this is not a criminal

case and it's a civil case, it's likely

the source of where that truth came from

will never be revealed. Keep in mind

that Donald Trump is a public figure.

So, this raises the standard that uh the

uh Donald Trump and the Trump

administration has to overcome when it

comes to suing the Wall Street Journal.

When somebody is a public figure, not

only does does essentially Donald Trump

have to prove that the information was

false, but they have to prove that the

Wall Street Journal acted with actual

malice or reckless disregard for the

truth. So, it's actually more than just

a burden that the Wall Street Journal

knew the information was false. The Wall

Street Journal could be of the point of

view that says, "Hey, we got this from a

source. This could be true." Or what

Donald Trump is saying could be true,

but here's the information that was

leaked to us and we're just sharing it

with the public so the public can make

their determination.

This is going to be a very high burden

because obviously Donald Trump is a

public figure. Even myself as a YouTuber

can be considered a public figure. So

it's it's much harder for a public

figure to defend against defamation or

slander or liel because you put yourself

out into the public and you open

yourself up to criticism. And so

therefore, thanks to New York Times v.

Sullivan, the standards against uh uh

the essentially plaintiff are very very

high. So Donald Trump, the plaintiff

here, has very very high standards to

overcome this. Uh, and this now

obviously breaking news. The other

elements that are going to have to be

proven are that the Wall Street Journal

must essentially be proven. It must be

proven that the Wall Street Journal knew

it was false, not that the Wall Street

Journal simply shared something. So the

Wall Street Journal in this piece would

have to say, "Hey, we verified this as

true." We'll look at this in just a

moment. uh and uh it would have to be

proven that there was actual malice or

reckless disregard for the truth. Simply

Donald Trump saying, "Hey, that's that's

fake news." is not enough because then

anybody who's going to have a hit piece

written about them could simply say,

"Hey, that's fake news. Oh, I guess we

can't publish it." Doesn't work that

way. And take a look at the wording

here. I'm sure this article was very

well worded on purpose. Take a look at

this. Uh, Maxwell was preparing a

special gift to mark the occasion. She

turned to Epstein's friends and family.

One of them was Donald Trump. Maxwell

collected letters from Trump and dozens

of Epstein's other associates for a

birthday album according to documents

reviewed by the Wall Street Journal.

Those documents are going to end up

coming up. Maybe they were a leak from

the government, which might make it

easier to pierce that sort of

journalistic privilege, or they came

from a private source. But they say here

that pages from a leatherbound album

assembled before Epstein was first

arrested are among the documents

examined by uh by Justice Department

officials who investigated Epstein and

Maxwell. According to people who have

reviewed the pages, it's unclear if

these are part of the president's recent

review. The Epstein files blah blah blah

or you know Donald Trump is refusing to

release these. Take a look at this. The

letter bearing Trump's name which was

reviewed by the journal is body like the

others talking about the breast and the

signature of uh signature by the pubic

hair. Uh take a look at this. Donald

Trump denied writing the letter. See

they are telling you that Donald Trump

saying it's fake. So this is not the

Wall Street Journal saying we're saying

Trump is wrong. This is the Wall Street

Journal saying hey we got a document

showing a letter that had Trump's name

on it. We're not telling you it's true.

In fact we're telling you this is fake.

I never wrote that. He told the Wall

Street Journal he was preparing to sue.

The Wall Street Journal is never saying

that Donald Trump is wrong. The Justice

Department didn't respond. This was a

very carefully crafted article here

among those who submitted letters, talk

more about the letters. So, they talk

about that these documents exist. They

do talk about what the documents say.

They say that Donald Trump says they're

true. At no point does it seem like the

Wall Street Journal is saying, "We have

somehow verified that these are

definitely true." They're simply saying,

"Hey, there are letters and pictures out

there that have Donald Trump's signature

on it. At no point do they say it's

definitely true." And so that's going to

be really hard for Donald Trump to get

by because they clearly, and this was in

the article yesterday as well, they

clearly say Donald Trump, look, we

reported that we got this information.

We're not saying it's definitely true.

We're just saying we looked at documents

that have Trump's name on it and Donald

Trump says it's fake.

That's going to be a really difficult

case uh for Donald Trump to win. Oops,

that looks funny. Uh oh. Well, we'll go

with it for a moment. This is why you

need to get life insurance. Otherwise,

you'll change colors. Get it from our

paid sponsor in as little as 5 minutes

at metaven.com/life or take advantage of

that coupon code on building your wealth

over at meetke.com. No, we got to get

away from this. This looks broken.

Something went broken over there. Go to

meet mekeevvin.com and sign up for the

courses on building your wealth. You get

lifetime access. You pay once, you have

access forever. But really, it it shows

that the Wall Street Journal is not

saying this is definitely true. Which

makes it really difficult to say that

the Wall Street Journal acted with

reckless disregard for the truth. They

showed, hey, we looked at some documents

of some drawings with Trump's name on

it. Trump says they're fake. Hey, by the

way, Trump isn't releasing the Epstein

files.

well played probably Wall Street Journal

for now, but even though the Wall Street

Journal could legally be right, they're

going to have a world of hurt from

Donald Trump because when you mess with

the president,

>> why not advertise these things that you

told us here? I feel like nobody else

knows about this.

>> We'll we'll try a little advertising and

see how it goes.

>> Congratulations, man. You have done so

much. People love you. People look up to

you.

>> Kevin Praat there, financial analyst and

YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always great to

get your take.