LYING in Plain Sight: The Flawed MEDIA Narrative on Guns.

hey everyone me kevin here gun violence

in the country is an epidemic and we've

got to talk about what just happened

last night and i've got a big question

for you last night in greenwood indiana

in a shopping mall at 6 p.m we heard

that a gunman opened fire with a long

gun rifle we're not exactly sure what

yet in a food court which is a place

that you should be able to allow your

kids to play on the food court

playground or focus on sampling orange

chicken versus the garlic bread that the

pizza place is going to offer you as a

free sample and instead turned into a

zone of war of gunfire

and folks what we want to take away from

this is first of all that three innocent

people lost their lives two were injured

and the gunman was killed

but what i really want to highlight and

i want to open a dialogue about is

the gunman

dying and how he died and do we think

that there's a way how this gunman died

could be replicated to end mass

shootings almost as soon as they begin

sooner

rather than later that's the

conversation that we want to have

because generally there are two

arguments on the left there's the

argument that what we need in order to

limit gun violence is more gun control

for example in the state of california

california believes that

legal gun owners should have implements

attached to devices like rifles that

make it harder for you to put your

finger around them for example like a

trigger guard for you to put your thumb

around the handle so it's harder to use

at extended periods of time yet that

trigger guard is attached by two screws

that any criminal would simply or

somebody who's intent on implementing a

mass shooting would just

unscrew because who's going to pay

attention to that gun control law when

you could just unscrew it with two

screws it seems silly and nonsensical or

magazine limits that have plenty of

loopholes that allow individuals to

simply have larger cap magazines but

then again why are we punishing good

people with guns when it's bad people

with guns that we should be punishing

and bad people with guns don't care

about your magazine limits in fact let's

even attach larger magazines like 30

round barrel magazines to glocks

anyway the point is gun control seems to

be the focus of what our current

governments especially like those in

california focus on or new york

but something that we don't focus a lot

on which we really should focus a lot

more on is what i consider to be lawful

gun ownership with training

combined with a combination a

combination very important more

mental education in our schools and

services mental education plus

and financial education and services

right that's our plus

and more medical services to help people

with depression and despair or other

problems we've got a society that has

problems we should be spending money on

solving these problems

at the same time encouraging lawful gun

ownership why because folks this

shooting in this indiana mall was

stopped by a 22 year old legally

carrying a firearm

it was stopped almost as soon as it

began

this this shooting this horrible

shooting in greenwood indiana could have

been another absolutely horrific

disaster and it already was with three

innocent people losing their lives but

unfortunately the mainstream media

doesn't like to talk about

more mental health spending or more uh

positivity towards illegal gun ownership

like let's talk about gun training

rather than gun control right and the

sad thing is it seems like the

mainstream media is burying the story

here's the front page of the new york

times

no mention no matter how far you scroll

here is the front page of cnn no mention

no matter how far you scroll it just

goes to show the mainstream media

doesn't want to cover this story let's

try to understand why because it seems

like it doesn't fit into their regular

narrative let's instead talk about how

we could have

a legally

armed society when they want to be and

trained if they want to be at very

affordable prices or potentially

sponsored by the government so that way

we can limit further loss of life

because here's the reality and we're

actually going to purposely look at a

left leaning source for this we're going

to look at this new york times chart and

see that

of

mass shootings

57

of them 57 percent

end before the police arrive

which suggests that if 57 of attacks end

before the police arrive more than half

of the shootings will be over more than

half of all mass shootings will be over

before the police arrive

and even if they arrive and you end up

with officers like we had over at the

uvalde shooting they might not even do

anything

now i don't want to get political about

what happened in texas i think it's

terrible what happened in texas but the

point is just focus on the 57 percent of

the time that attacks happen how do they

end most of the time well folks 75 of

the time the mass shooters get to kill

so many people that they get tired and

they leave the scene

or they kill themselves

that should be

flipped

because only 25 of the time they're

ended by bystanders and that is because

in my opinion even though the mainstream

media is trying to say look only 22

uh times out of all these attacks where

shootings ended by a bystander with a

gun

the mainstream media is trying to

indicate that c guns don't help that

much the reality is we've got to ask

ourselves how many people are actually

actively carrying a gun

legally and are prepared to use it my

guess is on a regular average day in a

regular mall

maybe one to five percent of people

actually have a weapon

if

legally trained citizens who wanted to

carry a gun and were allowed to get gun

permits or or even subsidies to help

them properly train to use weapons if

these were the directions that our

government wanted to bring society

maybe we could see 5 to 15 percent of

people actually carrying which then we

would go to a chart like this and we

could potentially see that a substantial

portion of these shootings that end up

getting stopped by the attacker

themselves because they're done killing

people could get stopped earlier by

bystanders with weapons

now that's an opinion that's a thesis it

could be wrong but i want to know what

you think

is it possible that we could end more

mass shootings if governments focused on

things first of all like preventing mass

shootings in the first place by focusing

on mental education and financial

education to try to prevent or treat

despair and depression by increasing the

services that we provide to people

because people need services that's what

government's supposed to be there for

but then rather than punishing

legal gun owners how about actually

supporting legal gun owners so

supporting legal gun ownership to

potentially be able to have more folks

capable of intervening in the event of

mass shootings

before the police actually arrive i want

to know your thoughts in the comments

down below let me know what you think