TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Coming Return of Stimulus Checks & Recession.

18m 9s2,946 words442 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

so we've got a channel member with a

0:02

comment here about stimulus checks and I

0:05

think it's a brilliant topic that we

0:08

should discuss the potential of steamy

0:11

checks coming back to America let's

0:15

Analyze This Garrett purrington says if

0:19

we hit a hard recession with this

0:22

Administration referring to the Biden

0:24

Administration between now and 2024 they

0:27

will simply give more handouts one way

0:30

or another pushing inflation the

0:32

push-pull in 10 years prices will be

0:36

skyrocketing

0:37

so let's try to break this down and

0:41

analyze if and how stimulus checks could

0:45

make it back to the United States and

0:48

boy stemi checks would be another fun

0:51

session of video topics that we haven't

0:53

got to talk about in quite a while so

0:56

let's talk about the potential of

0:58

semi-checks now I think the easiest way

1:01

to do it is draw it out so let's do it

1:04

together first I think in order to

1:07

expect stimulus of any kind we would

1:10

have to have massive pain and massive

1:14

job loss now Elizabeth Warren is already

1:17

expecting somewhere around 3 million job

1:20

losses and the way she accomplishes that

1:23

is by saying if the unemployment rate

1:25

today is 3.5 percent and the FED thinks

1:28

it'll go to 4.5 percent the FED then the

1:31

reality is once the unemployment rate

1:33

goes up one percent history suggests the

1:35

unemployment rate will go up another

1:37

percent so history suggests we're gonna

1:39

go here since we've got just over 150

1:42

million people working in America

1:43

history suggests we should have about 3

1:46

million job losses at the same time

1:50

economic forecasts are really calling

1:52

for a recession or a negative GDP growth

1:56

sometime in Q3 Q4 right around the

2:00

holidays uh and so call it a holiday

2:02

recession see Christmas sweater holiday

2:05

recession it's almost like I wore this

2:08

by Design

2:09

so what could potentially the impact of

2:13

a holiday recession be well first of all

2:15

if we're in a recession if we actually

2:18

hit a recession usually and historically

2:21

that that doesn't mean that it will

2:23

happen this time but usually and

2:24

historically the stock market bottoms at

2:29

the start of a recession

2:31

so if the stock market bottoms at the

2:34

start of a recession and the recession

2:36

hasn't technically started yet then pain

2:39

in the stock market could still be ahead

2:41

of us so the stock market usually

2:43

bottoms at the start of recession the

2:45

only way to really then historically

2:46

suggest that the stock market hasn't hit

2:49

it bottom yet or has already hit bottom

2:51

rather would be to say that there's no

2:53

recession which is possible that there's

2:55

not a recession but for the purposes of

2:57

arguing stimulus checks let's assume the

3:00

stock market hits a new bottom at the

3:02

same time we get mass joblessness that

3:05

is a a sudden wave of 3 million jobless

3:08

uh individuals and that joblessness

3:11

creates a jobless spiral jobless spiral

3:16

this is I think where the government

3:17

would want to intervene because remember

3:19

the velocity of money when one person

3:22

spends five dollars at a hot dog stand

3:24

the person who takes that five dollars

3:27

then goes and spends that five dollars

3:29

on an employee to help them at the hot

3:31

dog stand that employee then spends

3:34

their wages on goods and services car

3:38

cleanings a muffler for their car radar

3:41

detector for their car I don't know

3:42

whatever they want food basic

3:45

necessities laundry whatever and you

3:47

have this circulation through the

3:49

economy and modern economic thoughts

3:51

suggests that when somebody spends money

3:54

it usually circulates through the

3:56

economy about four to five times but if

3:59

three million people have less money to

4:01

actually spend on goods and services

4:04

then you could actually take away four

4:07

to five times as much money which would

4:10

basically means if three million people

4:12

don't have income you could see the

4:14

impact of what could be as much as 12

4:17

million people without jobs because of

4:20

the velocity of money amplification

4:22

effect

4:23

now obviously there are Employment

4:26

Insurance programs and this is actually

4:28

where I think the government could stop

4:31

a jobless spiral because if 12 million

4:33

people were out of work then earnings

4:35

that companies are going to plummet then

4:36

they're going to hire less people and

4:38

then you get the spiral less earnings

4:40

they fire more people they then hire

4:42

less people right so they hire less

4:44

people they fire more people so more

4:45

people permanently unemployed in the

4:47

cycle less people spending money leads

4:49

to less hiring and you basically just

4:51

have a depressionary spiral well the

4:54

Keynesian economic thought which is one

4:56

that our government and Federal Reserve

4:58

like to follow is that well if times are

5:01

tough we should stimulate the economy so

5:04

how might they do that to stop a jobless

5:07

spiral well there are a few ways they

5:09

might do that the easiest way to think

5:11

about this is first how are they likely

5:14

to uh continue uh supporting an

5:20

anti-jobless spiral regime well first we

5:24

know this with certainty already we

5:26

expect they would amplify uh the debt

5:29

ceiling it seems like when I type today

5:31

this uh this HDMI connector is just

5:33

trash I bought a new cable so I'll fix

5:35

this for next time but uh let's go back

5:38

here so the first thing they might do is

5:39

amplify the death ceiling which is

5:41

basically saying they'll raise the debt

5:42

ceiling right once you raise the debt

5:44

ceiling what can you then continue to do

5:46

well you could continue to spend on chip

5:49

related Investments why would you

5:51

continue to spend on chip related

5:52

Investments via the chips act where you

5:54

could basically just and you don't even

5:56

need Congress to do this remember this

5:58

you could literally have the Biden

6:00

Administration just read the law of the

6:03

chip sack where they've agreed to you

6:05

know 80 plus billion dollars in spending

6:07

in chip manufacturing and they could

6:09

just Loosely interpret it to where all

6:12

of a sudden instead of spending 80

6:13

billion dollars they're actually

6:15

spending 240 billion dollars yes a 3X is

6:18

possible that's what Goldman Sachs said

6:21

in a piece we covered just three days

6:22

ago where Goldman sax thinks that

6:24

institutional stimulus check spending

6:26

could actually be three times as

6:28

expensive as previously thought because

6:30

of the way the Biden Administration is

6:32

interpreting it so what if they just

6:34

interpret it so loosely that it's

6:36

actually a four or five times investment

6:38

well now what you're doing is you're

6:40

creating jobs by going into more debt

6:43

that's likely to happen in chips it's

6:46

likely to happen in EV it's likely to

6:48

happen in solar hydro and other

6:51

scientific based uh based in my opinion

6:55

Investments

6:56

that the Biden Administration can

6:58

justify under acts that have already

7:00

been passed so I think the debt ceiling

7:02

gets raised hands down if we're knocking

7:04

on a door of recession that then enables

7:07

the government to spend more money on

7:08

programs that they've already passed

7:10

without the help of a bipartisan

7:13

Congress

7:15

another thing that could potentially

7:16

happen and we don't know this is you

7:19

could potentially good Lord you could

7:21

potentially have a bipartisan effort on

7:26

expanding unemployment Protections in

7:29

the event that you have an unemployment

7:32

crisis now these unemployment benefits

7:34

would probably be conjoined with some

7:36

kind of demand that individuals work I

7:40

don't believe that Congress is going to

7:42

go back to the days of here's massive uh

7:47

unemployment compensation for no work I

7:51

think there will probably be a look for

7:54

work requirements if Congress were to

7:57

expand in a bipartisan way unemployment

8:00

protections but I think this would

8:02

probably be the biggest stimulative uh

8:04

effect that Congress would have uh on

8:07

the economy is not only the Biden

8:10

Administration in their own way

8:12

basically increasing stimulus checks

8:14

that have already been written remember

8:16

what Goldman Sachs said they said hey

8:19

we've got about 390 billion dollars in

8:21

stimulus checks that'll probably end up

8:23

costing around 1.2 trillion dollars

8:26

because the Biden Administration is just

8:28

going to Loosely interpret those rules

8:30

but I actually do think that Congress

8:32

could in a bipartisan way increase

8:35

unemployment compensation stimulus

8:37

checks as long as people agree that

8:39

they're looking for work I think that's

8:41

how you can get a pretty divided

8:43

Congress right now Democrats and

8:45

Republicans on the same page and

8:48

actually printing money again

8:50

supporting massive unemployment checks

8:53

for people who've been laid off

8:54

especially in dare I say the tax sector

8:58

I think there's a chance you're going to

9:00

see a high level of tech unemployment

9:04

and that's going to lead to higher

9:07

unemployment checks to make sure people

9:10

who basically funded

9:13

so frustrating who basically funded a

9:16

very expensive lifestyle

9:18

I feel like I'm taking a Nintendo switch

9:20

here I've got expensive HDMI cables

9:24

expensive Apple dongles but no

9:28

oh don't you just love seeing Kevin blow

9:32

anyway so I there's this chance that you

9:35

have the tech sector that has an

9:37

expensive much more expensive lifestyle

9:39

right more expensive cars more expensive

9:41

apartments or whatever that actually

9:43

ends up fueling calls for higher

9:46

unemployment checks because they are now

9:49

unemployed and regular unemployment

9:51

won't help them pay the bills they

9:53

signed up for under salaries that they

9:55

used to be used to because of

9:57

unemployment caps basically so there is

9:59

the potential that you see stimulus

10:01

checks come back in the form of higher

10:05

unemployment compensation as long as to

10:08

appease Republicans there's a look for

10:10

work requirement that's potent that's a

10:12

potential now what about straight up

10:14

just stimmy checks is it possible stimi

10:19

checks is it possible that the Federal

10:21

Reserve and Congress issue stemi checks

10:24

well first you have to ask would the FED

10:27

print more money in the event uh of a

10:32

painful recessionary Dynamic that lasts

10:35

long so in Long recession right so let's

10:38

say Q3 Q4 we go into recession and by q1

10:42

2024 we're still in recession basically

10:47

the Fed uh went too far

10:50

is it possible that maybe instead of

10:53

getting stimmy checks to the tune of you

10:56

know twelve hundred dollars and then

10:58

fourteen hundred dollars and then

11:01

actually it was the other way around it

11:02

was twelve hundred dollars then we had

11:03

the six hundred dollars then we had the

11:05

fourteen hundred dollars from the Biden

11:07

step up then you had the uh child uh tax

11:10

credit right is it possible that we end

11:13

up getting a revisit of some form of

11:15

stemi checks maybe do I think it would

11:18

ever be to the degree that we saw here

11:20

very unlikely it's very unlikely we

11:23

would go back to this kind of stimulus

11:25

however is it possible that there would

11:27

be a a one-off maybe I think before

11:31

you'd ever get to a runoff and there was

11:32

you would not want to pray for that

11:34

because I think we would be in a pretty

11:36

deep recession if you prayed for that

11:37

but I do think that they'd probably go

11:40

back to some of the protections that

11:42

they previously had which were very

11:44

inflationary the expansion of the uh the

11:47

money supply is what created the

11:49

inflation that we have today but I think

11:51

they would actually and potentially make

11:54

the same inflationary mistakes that we

11:56

had the last time around just to a

11:58

slightly lower degree

12:00

I think though you could almost say with

12:03

certainty okay so let's let's put some

12:05

odds on this I think you could say with

12:07

certainty

12:09

uh that is like 99 likelihood uh which

12:13

is basically certainty that they are

12:15

going to Via the Biden Administration

12:17

print their way out of whatever

12:19

recession we're going into by dumping

12:22

money showering money into the chip

12:25

sector and the energy sector the

12:27

inflation reduction Act was a ruse

12:30

it's not going to reduce inflation it's

12:32

going to increase inflation

12:33

but because they told Republicans it was

12:36

going to be deficit neutral and

12:38

everybody believed them and now the

12:40

Biden Administration can Loosely

12:42

interpret every rule they want

12:44

there's going to be a massive amount of

12:45

spending here so if you're looking for a

12:47

job you're probably always going to be

12:49

able to get a job in chips manufacturing

12:51

EV solar Hydro you name it

12:55

over there I don't think there'll be a

12:56

shortage of jobs which I actually think

12:58

is going to be fantastic if you're

12:59

exposed to those kinds of stocks

13:02

now with maybe a 40 chance

13:07

I would say congress actually works

13:09

together to raise unemployment

13:12

compensation as long as there are look

13:14

for work requirements I'd actually go as

13:16

far as saying 40 to 60 percent in the

13:18

event we're in a recessionary

13:19

environment

13:20

oh and then stemmies I'd probably say a

13:24

one-off has maybe under the Biden admin

13:27

maybe a 20 chance but it would really

13:31

require a dirty recession so you

13:33

probably wouldn't want to go down that

13:35

direction uh so uh that that would be a

13:39

little scary so somebody here says why

13:42

would you stimulate the truth is out

13:44

there says why would you stimulate the

13:45

economy while at the same time at the

13:47

same time slowing the economy so the

13:50

only way this really plays out in my

13:53

opinion is that inflation is conquered

13:55

so inflation ends up proving to be

13:57

transitory right that so let me give you

13:59

an example of what that could look like

14:02

with data that's already happening uh I

14:06

want to pull up a NatWest piece and then

14:10

I want uh the costs for shipping

14:14

I have all I have so much data on my

14:16

iPad it's insane but uh it's somewhere

14:19

around here there got it that wasn't bad

14:22

look at this shipping costs out of China

14:26

I even wrote next to it this is what

14:28

transitory looks like okay that right

14:31

there is what transitory inflation looks

14:33

like so I know a lot of people are going

14:35

to say hey wait a minute how could you

14:36

possibly go back to stimulus checks if

14:39

you have all this crazy inflation well

14:41

you can't

14:42

here's how you go back to stimulus

14:44

checks okay

14:45

number one

14:47

inflation goes away inflation goes away

14:50

it goes away that's number one so step

14:54

number one is inflation goes away

14:55

however

14:57

to get there oh it's so annoying however

15:00

to get there you actually had to push

15:02

the economy into a nasty recession so

15:05

let's write that however now in uh nasty

15:09

oh my Lord whatever man uh you're now

15:13

you're in a nasty recession so inflation

15:15

goes away and now you're in a nasty

15:17

recession now that you're in a nasty

15:20

recession and you have no inflation

15:22

guess what the government can now do

15:24

they can print uh their way back out

15:28

but less than last time so that becomes

15:33

the rule right so the rule becomes look

15:35

we'll print but we just need to make

15:37

sure we're printing less than last time

15:39

because we don't want to create the

15:41

inflation again that we did last time so

15:43

let's draw that out for you for a moment

15:45

so inflation goes away however now we're

15:47

in a nasty recession so we want to print

15:48

our way out but we're going to do so

15:50

less than last time so imagine this I'm

15:52

going to draw a really big orange line

15:54

here and this is going to be inflation

15:56

okay so let's say we get inflation that

15:59

does this okay and then it goes negative

16:02

so we're actually at deflation well now

16:05

the government prints money via stimulus

16:07

checks or increased unemployment or

16:09

chips or EVS whatever so they print

16:11

money to push inflation back up and they

16:14

basically try to cause that right that's

16:18

the goal will they be able to accomplish

16:20

that probably not they'll probably screw

16:23

something up because that's what they're

16:24

really good at

16:26

but it could happen it could absolutely

16:30

happen that we end up falling into

16:32

deflation just like this chart shows you

16:34

I mean look at this chart this is

16:36

shipping costs out of China plummet

16:39

that's what our inflation is probably

16:41

going to look like now is it possible

16:43

that it'll look a little bit more like

16:45

this you know where where basically it

16:48

takes it stays higher for longer you

16:51

know it could even to some extent kind

16:52

of look like that right is it possible

16:55

yes

16:57

but if we get to deflation because of a

17:00

deep dark recession

17:02

I think they'll turn the printers right

17:04

back on and we'll be right back to

17:06

stimulus check 17.

17:07

so yes it is possible but there's

17:10

another thing that is possible as well

17:12

and it is you getting 12 amazing free

17:15

Stocks by signing up for Weeble at

17:17

metcaven.com free checking out the

17:19

amazing programs on building your wealth

17:21

link down below where you get lifetime

17:22

access and you can now buy out pay later

17:24

for them you can get in for I think less

17:26

than 40 bucks a month for a very short

17:28

period of time which is phenomenal just

17:30

check out all the different options

17:31

linked down below and you can get life

17:34

insurance sponsored here for as little

17:37

as well in as little as five minutes

17:39

five minutes life insurance

17:42

Apple pay for it now it's easy to do

17:45

check it out link down below

17:48

in the meantime look at my beautiful

17:50

banner here look at that me at Cabot

17:53

licensed financial advisor go to meet

17:55

kevin.com learn more

17:57

ETF real estate startup Affiliates all

17:59

that good stuff it's all linked down

18:01

below why not go check it out

18:04

support your favorite channel here on

18:06

YouTube

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.