The Truth | The Twitter Files & Hunter Biden's Laptop.

it's time to talk censorship it's time

to talk Twitter files Donald Trump the

FBI and Hunter Biden note my goal in

this video is going to be to be as

unbiased as possible however I will be

introducing my own personal experience

having run a campaign for governor

getting almost 1 million votes in

California against a governor whom I

think is terrible for California so when

it comes to bias let me be clear about

that I ran against the governor of

California whom I think is terrible for

California and if he runs for president

I'll be making a lot of videos about how

terrible he would be for America but in

this video we're going to remain as

unbiased as possible about the Twitter

files so without further Ado let's start

with the latest and greatest the latest

and greatest starts here it has to do

with actually a little bit more

background information and that's why I

want to start here it has to do with the

New York Post alleging that the FBI

repeatedly warned Twitter during weekly

meeting things before the 2020 election

to expect hack and leak operations in

other words putting Twitter on notice to

be aware that there could be some

damning posts about politicians and that

they should essentially potentially be

prepared to remove those sorts of posts

demonetize or Shadow ban those posts in

accordance with hacked material policies

and lo and behold when the hunter

Biden's story broke sure enough it was

removed from Twitter accounts who talked

about it were censored as will she see

in the Twitter files in just a moment

and Twitter did so under the belief that

they were following what they should be

doing the hacked in materials policy at

Twitter unfortunately leadership around

this policy was let's just say almost

entirely absent but what's also very

interesting is the allegation by the New

York Post that Not only was the FBI

warning Twitter about potential hack and

leak operations but it also put Facebook

on high alert for these sorts of Russian

propaganda dumps that could come which

apparently may have never actually come

but the FBI was clearly involved or at

least allegedly involved in telling

social media platforms to be prepared to

remove content that could be fake and

what's remarkable is according to the

New York Post here the FBI apparently

had access to emails between Rudy

Giuliani and the New York Post so

potentially and conveniently had access

to know when the New York Post would

publish the story about Hunter Biden's

laptop which they ended up doing in fact

this was the cover of the post right

here on October 14 2020 just three weeks

before the election there's the story

Biden secret emails

the FBI would have conveniently happened

to know when those posts were going to

go public because of their access to

giuliani's emails which they had access

to because of an investigation they were

conducting against Giuliani which ended

up getting dropped so that access to

giuliani's one away or emails went away

but they conveniently had access to his

emails right before the post story

dropped which gave them the potential

ability to warn Facebook and other news

organizations and Twitter about this

hack and leak operation and a lot of

folks of course have been concerned that

the FBI has become politicized as of

late a lot of folks who are looking

forward to the investigation of Donald

Trump saying no that's fake news the FBI

is not politicized of course then there

are the other half of Americans who say

oh no it's all politically driven okay

let's leave that there as we may and

let's get into the Twitter files because

what we've just done is revealed that

the New York Post is alleging the FBI

warns social media platforms at the very

least and again allegedly that hey there

could be some leaks coming and

conveniently the FBI may have had access

to know that there were some leaks

coming

and maybe conveniently that happened

three weeks before an election where the

FBI was potentially able to help

contribute to molding the outcome of the

election

who knows some folks say the same thing

is actually potentially what happened to

Hillary Clinton when the story around

not what was in Hillary's Clinton's

emails but the fact that Hillary Clinton

used a private email server blew up to

the point of potentially destroying her

election chances

who knows maybe it all goes both ways

but what we want to do is take a look at

the Twitter files and then make some

conclusions and we'll also talk about

what Donald Trump had to say about all

of this we'll make some conclusions

which I think would solve all of this

because I don't think it's really a good

idea to speculate on who's right or

wrong in all of this although I think

there are arguments that some of it is

pretty dang obvious I think my

conclusions are conclusions that all of

us can agree on so let's briefly go

through the most Salient arguments made

and leaked or released I should say on

Twitter about the Twitter files so first

Twitter has a hacked materials rule

where basically if there's hacked

materials they say they will remove it

and I'm speeding this up okay

however in addition to having a hacked

materials rule Twitter is also able to

delete tweets routinely upon the

requests of certain individuals so for

example a political party could send an

email to certain contacts at Twitter and

say hey we think these violate your

terms of service we think these tweets

are either hateful or misinformation or

disinformation or they're a lie or

they're liable or or they're hacked or

whatever they violate some form of

policy and the Biden team in this

example here sent on October 24th the

Biden team is asking you to potentially

remove these five tweets here here are

the links and the response is as simple

as handled

which is kind of scary kind of scary

that a political party could say hey you

know what we want these tweets removed

and Twitter would just reply handled

I would actually like to take a moment

to just talk about my own post

this this is a post that I made when I

announced my candidacy for governor

running against Governor Gavin Newsom in

California it was by far the most

popular post that I have ever made

and I wrote I'm not effing leaving I'm

running instead and it's true I haven't

left California I'm not leaving

California

but I talked about how we have to beat

Gavin news someone I have a full 20-part

plan that includes emergency action to

solve homelessness housing

Transportation schooling and more we

need a non-weenie baby in office

and this post

was censored by Facebook and deleted by

Facebook under their harassment policy

I'm like seriously my announcement post

which was at that point essentially

going viral

just happened to get deleted even though

I've never had a post deleted before and

nothing I said here is really harassing

for a public figure I mean come on folks

that's ridiculous and so now it makes me

think aha

I would love to know

if there is a paper trail of an email

from the Gavin Newsom team saying

something like more from the Newsome

team please remove this post from Kevin

pavrath boy wouldn't that have been a

potential Game Changer during my

election would it not have been possible

that that would have been ammunition

enough to show Tech censorship controls

elections and keeps dirty politicians in

office when they should not remain in

office and that they quell competition

keep in mind and and this this is

anecdotal but after the election I sat

down with people who were on air on TV

in California on California news

stations I sat down with them for coffee

privately and off the Record that's why

I will mention no names or stations and

I was privately told

Kevin you have to understand we could be

staring into a teleprompter and reading

something that we know is untrue but we

have to do it because that's what we're

told to do otherwise we're fired

the reality is

these news companies have to do what

keeps the establishment politicians

happy because guess what happens when

you're the establishment politicians

aren't happy oh you didn't happen to get

an invite to come to our next event why

didn't you get an invite because you

didn't help censor the person we wanted

you to censor it's corrupt and it's

sturdy now it's anecdotal and my

Solutions in this video will address

that potential problem

well I should say more than potential

problem but let's be real here I'm

trying to be unbiased

this folks is exactly what I believe I

dealt with and I was personally on the

receiving end in my 2020 election

campaign against the governor of

California

this gave me a lot of light when I saw

this because it was an aha moment this

is probably exactly what happened to me

but let's move on celebrities and

unknowns alike could be removed or

reviewed at the behest of a political

party both parties had access to these

tools for example in 2020 requests from

both Trump and the Biden campaign were

received and honored however the system

wasn't balanced it was based on contacts

because Twitter wasn't is overwhelmingly

staffed by people of one political

orientation of Democrats they were there

were more channels more ways to complain

open to the left well Democrats than the

right

and that's because of look at the

contributions by political party

recipient

now I want to be clear my political

orientation is very much in the middle I

ran as I actually ran in California as a

JFK style Democrat which is much more

conservative than today's style Democrat

I considered myself a 59 51-49 right

like 51 uh percent Dem 49 Republican uh

maybe maybe today that's slightly flip

but I'm really I really consider myself

in the middle of a bell curve and and I

know that's like you know that's going

to piss some people off people you go

well you didn't know you had a damn I

was like chill out okay try I I try to

be in the Middle with everything but

this stuff is embarrassing right like to

be associated with this is disgusting

look at this and I remember I was the

victim of this stuff contributions by

party of recipient 99 Democrats

zero to three percent Republicans it's

terrible this is absolutely disgusting

and my Solutions will address this we do

get a big jump uh from like 12 and it's

we skip like 13 14 15. uh and and I'm

gonna jump around because some of these

aren't that important

we do have a uh a New York Times article

that I like to bring up because the New

York Times was really active and also

suppressing the story they finally

nearly two years later referenced the

hunter Biden story and they linked to a

story that they had actually buried in

the newspaper back from October 2020 but

this piece right here was a 2022 I think

it was March 2022 piece from The New

York Times and they referenced the

hunter Biden laptop which they had

previously refused to do and so a lot of

folks saw this as tacit admission that

the New York Times was complicit and

also censoring the New York or the uh

newer post story on the hunter Biden

laptop

but there are comments here about how

Twitter took extraordinary steps to

suppress the story Kaylee mcineny was

locked out it sounds like there was a

lot of dissension apparently a lot of

this happened without the knowledge of

the CEO Jack Dorsey and not only did it

happen without the knowledge of the CEO

but a lot of it was just freelanced and

really what happened was once one person

made the decision a lot of the other

more left-leaning individuals at Twitter

just aligned with the previous decisions

of other Freelancers and said you know

what we'll just stick with that decision

and we'll just keep censoring the story

unfortunately the idea about there being

Russian disinformation even according to

the New York Times seemed to have not

been an issue despite the fact that the

FBI was warning about Russian

disinformation happening that was from

the New York Times by the way in 2020

suggesting no evidence of Russian

disinformation

by this point everyone knew this was all

just messed up says one former employee

and they were kind of just stuck into

the cycle rokana who's a democrat in my

opinion actually did a phenomenal job in

arguing here that this seems to be a

violation of the First Amendment if

there is hacked and classified

information or other information that

could expose a serious War crime and the

New York Times was to publish it I think

the New York Times should have the right

to do that a journalist should not be

held accountable for the illegal actions

of the source unless they actively aided

the Hacked so to restrict the

distribution of that material

specifically regarding a presidential

candidate seems not in keeping of the

interest of the people now this is

actually really important because

there's something known as journalistic

privilege so for example if you knew

something Shady was going on and you

sent it to me and then I reported on it

as a journalist I can't be held legally

accountable for disseminating that

information because I didn't take part

in collecting the information

potentially illegally but if it has

damning effects I'm allowed to share it

as a journalist right that's journalists

stick privilege that's very very

important and that's really what rokana

is talking about here and he also talks

about issues regarding section 230. okay

let's give you a brief rundown of

section 230 because this is a big deal

and then it relates to some of the

solutions that I have for all of this so

section 230 just quick summary it's part

of the 1996 Communications decency act

basically it says that companies like

YouTube Twitter Yelp Amazon are not

responsible for the content their users

post they're just basically platforms

that enable other people to post

whatever they want and as a platform the

platform should be immune from the

actions of the users they host it's

basically a liability protection for the

platform saying look the users are the

ones who should be liable if they say

bad things wrong things or if they do

things that are illegal the user should

be liable not the platform now this

makes sense to some degree but what

differentiates this is when somebody has

a control over what's said so for

example the New York Times has control

over what articles get published at the

newyorktimes.com this Hunter Biden

laptop story in the Twitter file story

was not really covered by ABC NBC CNN

briefly covered it right and Fox News

covered it like crazy that's a choice

that means those companies are not

platforms it means they're Publishers

they're choosing not to cover these

Twitter leaks and instead they're

choosing to cover something else like

the Donald Trump stuff right just like

Fox News might not cover uh you know

fraud allegations against uh or let me

clear that up just like Fox News might

not cover certain fraud allegations

against Trump and instead talk about the

Twitter files right that Choice doesn't

make you a platform it actually makes

you a publisher as soon as you have

Choice over what is said or posted you

become a publisher when you are a

publisher you are not immune from

liability now you have liability for

what you post the problem with Section

230 here is what happens when companies

like Twitter start going in and

demonetizing posts or removing the

ability for people to basically spread

their message right well then you start

like are you a platform or a publisher

you kind of start blurring that line and

that's the danger with Section 230.

Donald Trump made a big uh point about

trying to fight against section 230 and

remove section 230 suggesting that

platforms like Twitter who are censoring

his posts should be liable for their

actions right this became such an issue

that in 2020 we actually had a blow up

of Google potentially removing the

monetization ability of websites like

zerohedge and the Federalist both which

definitely lean right Zero Hedge at one

point was banned from Twitter and these

companies had been essentially

threatened to have their monetization

stripped from their websites for not

moderating the comments sections on

their websites now what's interesting

now is it seems like much of this has

blown over because if you go now to the

Zero Hedge comments the very first

article I kid you not the first article

I clicked on to look at the comments

section to see if they still had their

comment section on they do the very

first article and the very first comment

is from somebody named Kyle Rittenhouse

the Milf Hunter

okay and there are plenty of ads when

you turn off Adblock there are plenty of

ads in fact here is a Scientology ad

that plays on Zero Hedge and when you

click on why am I getting this ad you

get Google

about the advertiser Church of

Scientology International so clearly ads

are back on okay but but but what has

all of this led to this talk about

section 230 and these Twitter files well

it's led to calls from Donald Trump

posting on Truth social that basically

these Revelations from the Twitter files

show that there has been clear and

widespread election interference which

before we go deeper into Donald Trump

look at this during a live q a session

on Twitter Saturday afternoon musk said

if Twitter is doing one team's bidding

before an election shutting down

dissenting voices on a pivotal election

that is the very definition of election

interference frankly Twitter was acting

like an arm of the Democratic National

Committee it was absurd yeah no kidding

that is pretty much exactly what was

happening and this led Donald Trump to

suggest that the last election was

basically widespread fraud and deception

and therefore the Constitution should be

term terminated he basically called for

overthrowing the Constitution now this

this did not go very far with

Republicans uh in America this didn't go

very far with anyone other than really

hardcore Trump supporters uh but they

did something that Donald Trump called

for so

what do I think well here's what I think

the solution to all of this is and I

think I have

you know at least some personal impact

on this or or I am impacted personally

by it or had been or would have been

because of my political past and I'm not

a politician Iran is not a politician

people here I ran for governor and

they're like oh you're a politician I'm

like

what

that doesn't really make sense but

anyway final thoughts and solution

I think everybody should have the right

to make a report everybody should

equally have the right to make a report

that hey I think this post is violating

some kind of rule but every filing of a

report should be transparent

and every moderation of a report should

be public there should be complete and

utter accountability I should be able to

go on twitter.com reports right now and

see a list of every single report filed

or I should be able to look at an

individual post and see who's reporting

my posts

I should also see a column action taken

so I should see all the reports and all

the actions taken it should be complete

Lee transparent I think that would solve

a lot now of course I think that

something should be moderated like some

of the things Kanye West does shouldn't

be on the platform

they should be removed Kanye probably

doesn't need a mouthpiece I'm gonna get

a little bit of a loose cannon what he

did to Taylor Swift wasn't cool okay I'm

a Swifty well again I'm biased uh but uh

but uh this should be full transparency

see because if I could now go back and

say Gavin Newsom you ruined by campaign

by trying to censor me here here here

here

well that makes the case for running

against him again

I could also if I could show moderation

potentially hold platforms accountable

for costing us money

and that then makes platforms fearful

and then what do they do they're a

little bit more careful about what kind

of content they remove and when they

infringe on people's free speech

my take on the Twitter files thank you

so much for watching if you like this

content consider sharing it consider

subscribing and we'll see in the next

one good luck

and Godspeed