TRANSCRIPTEnglish

Pixel 10: is it the Best or the Worst?

14m 2s2,989 words457 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:01

Wait, didn't Adam have a hot take?

0:04

>> That's around the category.

0:06

>> It was pixel related. My hot take was

0:08

that Pixel 10 was phone of the year.

0:10

>> Can you press that button for me?

0:14

[laughter]

0:14

>> There you go.

0:14

>> I'm surprised you actually did it.

0:18

>> I have the Pro.

0:19

>> Yeah.

0:19

>> And I feel like I spent too much. Like I

0:22

should have just gotten the 10 because

0:24

the 10 does everything the Pro does.

0:26

It's super on sale almost immediately if

0:28

you don't get it at launch. like if you

0:30

just wait a couple weeks, it's on sale.

0:31

And besides that,

0:33

>> the AI, I hate to say it, but the AI

0:35

stuff that the Pixel has been doing

0:37

compared to something like the iPhone,

0:39

which is just another iPhone, it's

0:41

actually been very useful. And like

0:43

[clears throat]

0:44

>> thinking about switching phones, even

0:45

Android to Android, I'm like, uh, I'm

0:47

going to miss some of those AI features,

0:49

though. Like, I really enjoy them. I

0:51

mean, I could go to Samsung because

0:52

Samsung just has all the Gemini features

0:54

anyway. I was that's exactly how I would

0:55

pick it apart is like if I were giving

0:57

an AI of the year award, it would go

1:00

straight to Google and then by proxy

1:02

also Samsung because they use all the

1:03

same stuff.

1:04

>> And then I would also say to your point

1:06

of the Pixel 10 Pro feeling like a

1:08

ripoff. I think it's because it was a

1:09

worse deal than ever this year.

1:11

>> And it doesn't mean that 10 is phone of

1:14

the year good. It just means it's a way

1:16

better deal and feature set because it

1:19

has all the same software features and

1:20

it has the same tensor chip

1:22

>> and triple cameras.

1:24

>> I just feel like

1:26

if if you take I mean I know this is a

1:27

hard ask but if you take someone out of

1:29

the like Apple versus Android world like

1:32

a fresh person coming into the world

1:34

who's just looking for their first

1:35

smartphone and they have no no horse in

1:38

any race

1:39

>> and they're like give me a phone. I'd

1:41

probably give them a Pixel because it's

1:43

doing more interesting.

1:44

>> Where in the world do they live?

1:45

>> It doesn't matter.

1:46

>> You're giving them the phone or they

1:48

have to They don't have to pay for the

1:48

phone.

1:49

>> Yeah. Yeah. No, I'm giving them the

1:50

phone.

1:50

>> You're giving them a Pixel 10.

1:51

>> Like the best phone. I'm giving you a

1:52

phone. Here's a Pixel 10.

1:54

>> That's interesting. I

1:56

>> That's an interesting question. I would

1:57

probably give that person a

1:59

>> S20. No, I [laughter] would give them an

2:01

S25 Ultra. Probably

2:04

>> just like the most beefiest.

2:05

>> Just the most stable. It's the most

2:08

boring, the most stable. that doesn't

2:09

improve that much year to year, but it

2:11

always has good battery, good cameras,

2:13

good software updates, good screen every

2:14

time.

2:15

>> You want to give someone fresh to the

2:16

universe a boring phone?

2:18

>> Yeah. Well, I don't want to give them a

2:20

phone that like if I give them a a

2:21

Xiaomi 17 Pro, next year there's going

2:23

to be like a totally different design

2:25

and no screen on the back, but this

2:27

other crazy feature, and they're going

2:28

to have gotten used to one thing and

2:30

have to switch around. People just want

2:31

stability.

2:32

>> That's exactly what we went through in

2:33

the early 2010s. Okay.

2:35

>> Every single year was fresh as hell.

2:38

>> Yeah. Yeah,

2:39

>> consistency was not a thing. I don't

2:40

know her.

2:41

>> As the only Pixel 10 owner here, Andrew,

2:43

what do you think of my take?

2:44

>> I think you're wrong.

2:45

>> Um, well, it's funny because you you

2:47

keep thinking

2:49

>> I feel like I should go down. I keep

2:51

feeling I feel like I should have spent

2:53

another $100 and went up because then I

2:56

would have gotten 256 base storage and

2:58

better cameras and

3:00

>> a better I I mostly wanted the yellow,

3:02

which is my ultimate downfall.

3:03

>> The only reason I got the thought would

3:06

be so bad. [laughter] Yeah. Uh

3:10

uh I think one thing you did mention

3:12

though which is kind of a comment I

3:14

wanted to address is

3:16

>> there's so many people we judge

3:18

everything on MSRP at launch. Um, which

3:21

is like a lot of people keep saying,

3:23

"Well, this was actually a great phone

3:24

once it went on sale, blah blah blah."

3:25

And it's like that can be true, but it's

3:28

so hard for us to ever base that off of.

3:29

I know we've said this a thousand times,

3:31

but like I can't we can't base things

3:32

off of carrier deals and two for one

3:34

deals and like on sale the Pixel will

3:37

go. It's great to know it great. It's

3:39

great to say like, "Hey, this kind of

3:41

sucks at $800, but if you're willing to

3:42

wait three months or Black Friday, the

3:44

Pixel will be way cheaper." I mean, MSRP

3:47

stands for manufacturers suggested

3:49

retail price, and that means that that's

3:51

what they think that that device is

3:53

worth.

3:54

>> So, if that's their judgment of it, then

3:56

that's probably what we should be basing

3:57

it on.

3:57

>> Yeah. And I could also, you could

3:59

probably make the argument that things

4:00

that constantly go on sale means that a

4:02

suggested price probably wasn't the best

4:06

uh idea in the first place, and it's

4:08

correcting pretty quickly.

4:10

>> Well, Google should figure that out cuz

4:11

they do the same thing every single

4:13

year. [laughter] Yeah,

4:14

>> just make it cheaper to begin with and

4:15

you'll sell way more.

4:16

>> They had that. They had it for a while.

4:18

>> I know. They did. They almost did it.

4:20

>> Remember when like

4:21

>> they could have had it all.

4:22

>> We were saying that like Pixel 7 was too

4:24

good of a deal to not even look at the

4:25

Pro and people on the Google team were

4:27

like, I guess we should just make it

4:29

more expensive.

4:31

You should have. You really screwed the

4:32

pooch on that one, man.

4:33

>> Well, they shouldn't have made it $300

4:35

more for the Pro before. Like that was

4:37

insane.

4:38

>> Overall though, um I'm pretty happy with

4:40

the awards. I think that people picked

4:42

up on some trends of like this. I don't

4:45

know when's the last time Samsung or

4:47

when's the last time Google won zero

4:49

awards

4:50

>> and Samsung S series won zero awards.

4:52

>> Yeah, probably first time in a while.

4:55

>> Um, iPhone winning bust and winner in

4:59

the same year is hilarious. I think

5:01

that's also happened before. Didn't HTC

5:03

pull that off?

5:04

>> No, they did most improved and bust.

5:06

>> O. And we they asked for the most

5:09

improved trophy, so we sent [laughter]

5:10

them the toilet bowl trophy. Also,

5:12

>> it's hilarious. Yeah. Anyway, so let us

5:15

know in the comments if you agree,

5:16

disagree. We enjoy reading all the

5:19

>> Let me speedrun a couple comments.

5:21

>> The comments. All right.

5:22

>> The most comment was, "Wearing a blazer

5:24

and a hoodie is diabolical, apparently."

5:26

>> Last year, I got the comment.

5:28

>> I thought it looked sweet, but I have no

5:29

fashion sense at all, so maybe that

5:31

tracks.

5:31

>> I loved it.

5:32

>> All right, next comment.

5:33

>> Good lord. This one recently has been

5:36

nagging at me a little bit, but I

5:37

there's so many people who love to say

5:40

you're in a bubble. You don't get to

5:41

experience all the other phones, but

5:43

like we're all in our own bubbles. So,

5:45

as long as this is my awards,

5:48

>> I thought you were super clear about it

5:49

this year, too. Sorry.

5:50

>> Phones I test.

5:51

>> Yeah.

5:52

>> Phones you test and ones like

5:54

>> it's within the US bubble because we

5:56

live in the US

5:59

>> unfortunately. We try like we probably

6:01

get more phones than the average US

6:03

reviewer gets and you definitely try

6:05

them. But I thought you were very clear

6:06

this year like these are my awards the

6:08

things that I like.

6:09

>> It's I also said that specifically

6:10

because other YouTubers also do their

6:13

own awards. If you have your people were

6:15

uh quote tweeting my list and giving

6:17

their own set of awards which is maybe

6:19

they have used some of those phones,

6:20

maybe they haven't. But like anyone can

6:21

make their own set of what they think is

6:23

the blank of the year.

6:25

>> Um I give mine because I think I have a

6:27

unique perspective of I've been able to

6:28

test all these devices. So, here's my

6:30

perspective from what I've tested and

6:31

then other people will give theirs. So,

6:33

yeah, I'm I'm sticking with mine.

6:35

>> Yeah, obviously. [laughter]

6:38

>> Um, okay. I went through a couple of

6:39

these just in our normal thing. Okay,

6:42

here's one that made me mad. [laughter]

6:45

>> No. And it has nothing to do with our

6:46

audience. It has to do with YouTube.

6:48

>> Where's the timestamps?

6:50

>> Okay. I added them at at launch.

6:52

>> Did you?

6:53

>> They were there. Yeah. So, they were

6:54

there for a couple hours and then I saw

6:56

that comment. Then I went back up and I

6:58

was like, "They're gone." So, I went

6:59

back to the description. They're all

7:01

still sitting there. So, I simply

7:02

deleted a letter and added a letter and

7:04

hit save again and all the time stamps

7:06

came back.

7:08

>> So, we do this with the pod. We've We've

7:09

had this struggle before. Obviously,

7:11

this is a video that we should be

7:12

timestamping. So, I

7:14

>> I'm sorry, but also like not cuz it's

7:17

not my fault, but yeah, the time stamps

7:19

should be back. And if they disappear

7:20

again, just ping me on Twitter again and

7:22

I'll put them back. There was a comment

7:23

that did the time stamps and everyone's

7:25

like, "You're a savior." It's like they

7:26

were in the description the whole time,

7:28

[laughter] but just like, "Yeah."

7:30

>> Yeah. YouTube,

7:32

>> what the man,

7:33

>> please let I want a public apology. Fix

7:36

this.

7:37

>> Also, this isn't like UI. Like, this

7:39

isn't like a YouTube feature where you

7:40

click the timestamp button and add them.

7:42

This is if you decide in your

7:45

description to type out timestamps with

7:47

titles, it auto detects it in the

7:49

description of the video and adds

7:51

timestamps. Everyone has sort of figured

7:53

out that that's how you do that at this

7:54

point, but there's never been official

7:56

UI from YouTube to add timestamps to a

7:59

video. Yeah. Why?

8:00

>> It's unofficial.

8:01

>> It's a super useful feature.

8:03

>> It should be the easiest.

8:04

>> There's only like a trillion dollars in

8:06

data center investment way [laughter]

8:07

from pulling this up. They're going to

8:08

get it soon. Don't worry.

8:09

>> Seems very doable. They basically have

8:11

it already, right? You can pick where

8:13

ads go in the middle of your video

8:15

through a UI system, right?

8:16

>> But Andrew Andrew [laughter] Andrew

8:17

Andrew

8:19

>> make them money. Okay. It can d it can

8:22

insert dynamic ads into timestamps, but

8:25

I can't just pick that timestamp and

8:27

write with this text.

8:28

>> Do timestamps make them money?

8:30

>> They got rid of [laughter] annotations.

8:31

They got rid of all this the clutter. I

8:34

think it would be super easy to add a

8:36

timestamp feature, please. YouTube,

8:38

>> I want to scream. It makes me so

8:41

>> seems so obvious. By the way, the video

8:43

we did the summer awards is a 2.4x1

8:45

aspect ratio, which meant it's not

8:47

supported uh for end cards. So, I

8:50

couldn't add end cards to really.

8:51

>> It's an unsupported aspect ratio, which

8:53

I thought was a bummer.

8:54

>> What?

8:54

>> Uh, but yeah, that's another weird quirk

8:56

about this video.

8:57

>> I saw a lot of comments about that, too.

9:00

>> Why didn't this auto play? [laughter]

9:02

>> I think the last thing I have here is

9:04

there's a lot of love for the Red Magic

9:06

11 Pro.

9:07

>> Yeah, phone. Yeah. Uh, I have flirted

9:11

with the idea of adding a gaming

9:13

category every year, but I never really

9:14

test that many gaming phones and I'm

9:18

also not even that into gaming. A lot of

9:19

the gaming phones I end up testing, I

9:21

end up looking at them through the lens

9:23

of are they a good phone the rest of the

9:25

time that you're not gaming, right?

9:26

>> So, like the two or three gaming phones

9:28

we got this year were good phones. But

9:31

>> this phone had like a a liquid like

9:33

cooling loop that was like visible

9:34

through the glass back. It was super

9:36

interesting. I'm pretty sure Zack tore

9:37

it down. It was a really interesting

9:38

interior. Uh like a phone on the side of

9:41

the phone blowing hot air out of it.

9:42

Like it was a cool phone.

9:44

>> Um but I it didn't really it wouldn't

9:46

have won like my design award. It

9:48

wouldn't have won my best big phone. So

9:50

it just kind of didn't get mentioned. So

9:51

that's valid. I just haven't like there

9:53

is no gaming category. So

9:55

>> yeah. Did you see what it looked like in

9:58

your story about the uh

10:00

>> I saw someone screenshot it looked kind

10:01

of

10:01

>> it took like a story that we were

10:03

shooting smartphone awards and because

10:04

it's like a it's like a clear back but

10:08

it has this like faded black border and

10:11

for some reason the way the light was

10:12

hitting the phone and you took it it

10:13

just looked like this almost see-through

10:15

phone with black bezels and no one could

10:17

figure out what it was.

10:18

>> Oh wow.

10:19

>> Um

10:19

>> that's funny.

10:20

>> It was Yeah, it was kind of

10:21

>> Does have 80 watt wired and wireless

10:23

charging. Yeah, they got wireless

10:24

charging in there, which is cool.

10:26

>> 80 watt wireless.

10:27

>> Is that just like a space heater?

10:29

[laughter]

10:29

>> Yeah. I mean, it's probably% It's kind

10:32

of crazy how many phones charge at 80.

10:33

Don't use that in your apartment.

10:34

>> Especially when they don't have uh G2

10:37

and so they can't perfectly align.

10:38

They're probably losing so much heat.

10:40

>> Wait, 80 watt wireless.

10:42

>> It has both 80 watt wired and 80 watt

10:44

wireless.

10:45

>> Oh my god, it's losing a lot of heat.

10:48

>> You need like the perfect charger.

10:49

>> Yeah.

10:49

>> Okay, [clears throat] I have one more

10:50

thing I noticed quite a few people

10:52

mentioned. Ellis, did you use the PS3

10:54

startup sound?

10:56

>> Dude,

10:58

>> let me let me I This was a This was This

11:00

was a healthy learning experience for

11:02

me. You know what I mean? Cuz I went

11:03

into this I was like, I want to use

11:07

music to explain what makes this

11:10

Smartphone Awards different from all the

11:12

other smartphone awards we've done in

11:13

the past because that's something that

11:15

we can't exactly express visually. I do

11:18

think this was the most beautiful set

11:19

and the most beautiful lighting we've

11:21

ever had for a smartphone awards. But

11:23

also, we're we're we're at the top of

11:25

our game right now. We are we are we are

11:27

chugging out these excellent videos. And

11:30

I wanted the theme of this smartphone

11:31

awards orally to be prestige. And I

11:35

thought very hard about that and I said,

11:37

how can we in about 8 seconds

11:39

communicate prestige and and tradition

11:42

and the fact that we've been doing this

11:43

longer than anyone else has been doing

11:45

this? And I thought, you know what would

11:46

be great?

11:47

>> PlayStation.

11:48

>> No,

11:49

>> PlayStation. [laughter]

11:50

>> For 300 years, for 300

11:54

years,

11:54

>> before America,

11:55

>> orchestras have been tuning the exact

11:58

same way with an obo starting, then the

12:01

concert master, then the rest of the

12:04

orchestra.

12:05

>> I thought I thought it

12:08

>> for three because that had been

12:10

happening for 300 years, everyone would

12:12

know

12:13

>> that's the case. But apparently this

12:15

little company that makes a little box

12:17

called the Xperia [laughter]

12:20

REWROTE WHAT THAT SOUND WAS FOR EVERYONE

12:22

in the world. And I probably should have

12:25

known that. [laughter]

12:27

>> But yes, apparently you cannot use the

12:29

sound of an orchestra tuning without

12:30

people being like, "Oh, that's the

12:32

Uncharted machine."

12:33

>> LSL. You think too highly of us.

12:35

>> It's an expensive.

12:37

>> Yeah. So, yes. No.

12:38

>> Almost $2,000.

12:39

>> My goal was not to use the PlayStation.

12:42

Actually, fun fact, that is the second

12:45

original piece of music that has ever

12:47

been written in a video here. Rufus and

12:49

I wrote that from scratch and and and

12:51

produced it ourselves. So, no, I didn't

12:54

use the PlayStation 3 [laughter] startup

12:56

sound in our great minds thinking alike

12:59

situation,

13:00

>> I guess. So, and uh also, how dare

13:03

everyone pay so much attention to that?

13:05

And I didn't see one comment about the

13:07

toilet flush I used in the in the bust

13:10

of the year's car. I was shocked that

13:11

nobody mentioned that. I will say we we

13:13

put so many Easter eggs in videos that

13:16

it sort of trained people to look for

13:19

Easter eggs, even [music] some of which

13:22

don't exist. So, I am both shocked that

13:24

they didn't notice the toilet flush, but

13:27

also not shocked that they assigned PS3

13:30

sound to the others. So, we'll have to

13:33

take some win, some lose some [laughter]

13:36

>> to the Anyway, but thank you for

13:38

listening. If you're subscribed here and

13:40

not to the main pod, and I know there

13:43

are some of you,

13:45

what are you doing?

13:47

500K.

13:54

[music]

13:59

>> [music]

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.