TRANSCRIPTEnglish

The Fed is Preparing to PRINT | Big Flip Today.

14m 14s2,604 words375 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

Today was what started as a really

0:02

awkwardly quiet day and all of a sudden

0:04

throughout the day stocks kept going up

0:07

and up and up on what was relatively

0:10

little data. The Chicago National

0:12

Activities data came in negative but

0:14

durable goods sales came in stronger for

0:16

March obviously as people front ran

0:19

tariffs and earnings for Q1 are still

0:22

doing meaningfully well decently. for

0:25

example, and I don't play earnings, but

0:26

this morning course members were asking

0:28

Kevin, "What do you think about Google

0:30

earnings?" And I think, well, we know

0:31

that Google is mostly an advertising

0:34

company, and advertising typically gets

0:36

hit in a recession, not leading up to a

0:39

recession. So, it's a good chance they

0:41

can beat on ads. But again, I don't like

0:43

to play earnings. But sure enough,

0:45

Google beat on ads, which again is not a

0:48

surprise because you're getting this

0:49

sort of compression at Google before

0:52

we're actually in the advertising

0:54

recession. Now, the advertising

0:56

recession could come and the same thing

0:58

could come to Meta stock. I mean, Meta

0:59

was $740 not that long ago, and now it's

1:02

trading for $557. In fact, it was just a

1:05

couple days ago under $500, which is

1:08

this remarkable almost 35% compression.

1:11

But today, the NASDAQ just kept beating

1:14

numbers. We went 458, beat, we went 460,

1:17

right through the line, beat. We ended

1:19

up at 467. So, why did that happen

1:22

today? What gave the market enthusiasm?

1:25

Well, in my opinion, it could be

1:27

somewhat of a Federal Reserve, I don't

1:29

want to say U-turn, but U-turn in what

1:34

the market is paying attention to. So,

1:36

this is an interesting Fed U-turn

1:38

because it's not so much the Fed U-turn,

1:41

it's the market choosing to listen to

1:42

something different. So, this morning,

1:44

Fed chair or not chair, got to be

1:46

careful with that. That's Mr. Powell.

1:48

Uh, one of the Fed board members, Mr.

1:50

Waller, came out and told us that they

1:53

will absolutely cut should employment

1:56

begin to weaken. In fact, he told us

1:58

that uh firms uh are expected to see or

2:02

and conduct higher layoffs. we would

2:05

expect to see more employment. Uh he

2:07

also thinks that as a result of that

2:09

companies may not pass on as much of the

2:12

tariff costs because well frankly they

2:14

don't have the pricing power which we've

2:16

talked about before which again means

2:18

you get a cost push so companies have

2:20

more cost but you don't have a demand

2:22

pull which means people aren't willing

2:25

to pay whatever price you ask and that

2:27

just leads to margin compression and

2:29

what's the easiest relief valve for

2:31

that? Labor. So Waller gets it and I

2:34

think markets today were reacting to a

2:36

Fed that instead of doing the cross art

2:38

and going well we got to wait for uh you

2:40

know what the impact of tariff inflation

2:42

is going to be. We got Waller who

2:45

appears to be applying for a job. It

2:47

appears Waller would be the perfect kind

2:50

of at least he's playing his positioning

2:53

this way. He's playing his hand this way

2:55

to uh sort of be that Fed board member

2:58

who's like see Mr. Trump your tariffs

3:00

aren't inflationary. I'll go ahead and

3:02

cut for you as soon as labor weakens.

3:05

It's almost like he's applying for the

3:08

job of Fed chair. Now, this is really

3:10

interesting because Bessant just last

3:12

week told us that the White House would

3:15

consider starting their discussions with

3:18

potential replacements to Jerome Powell

3:20

in August. That's only four months away.

3:24

So, if discussions are going to start in

3:26

August, why not start positioning

3:28

yourself in interviews as a board member

3:31

who's willing to play the Trump ball

3:34

game? And now, partly we might think, oh

3:36

no, you know, we want that Fed

3:38

independence. Of course, we don't want

3:39

Powell fired. And but partly, we also

3:42

want a Fed that makes decisions

3:44

independent of, you know, political

3:46

power, like having a better seat at the

3:49

Fed. But Waller is actually right. We

3:53

all know this. In fact, the big concern

3:55

we have is not that the Fed is going to

3:58

act. It's that the Fed is just going to

4:00

be late in acting. Because generally

4:02

tariffs lead to a stagnation in the

4:05

economy, which yes, in the short term is

4:07

inflationary, but it tends to lead, at

4:09

least tariffs of this magnitude, should

4:11

they remain, will likely lead to a

4:13

recession. A recession is generally

4:16

deflationary. In other words, people

4:18

lose their jobs, people spend way less,

4:20

and prices actually come down, which in

4:23

a long-term mindset, and a long-term

4:25

point of view is actually part of the

4:27

healing process, right? So, prices come

4:29

down. We finally get rid of some of this

4:31

inflation disaster that we had postcoid

4:34

and we correct those prices, but at that

4:38

moment, you need a Federal Reserve

4:39

that's willing to respond not to

4:41

inflation, but to the labor market. So,

4:43

in other words, right now you've got a

4:46

Federal Reserve that's like, "Hey, hey,

4:48

Fed or uh hey, hey, Trump, you know,

4:50

what you're doing is inflationary."

4:52

That's true. See, both of these could be

4:54

true. It's a timeline. Yes, it will be

4:57

inflationary, at least for the time

4:59

being, until you create stagnation,

5:01

companies don't have pricing power,

5:03

people get laid off, and then all of a

5:05

sudden the Fed has to swoop in with a

5:06

giant bailout. And so this is

5:08

interesting because my mindset and then

5:10

I want to give you more of Waller's

5:12

interview is that the Fed doesn't cut in

5:14

May or June, but that they actually cut

5:17

more aggressively by the end of the

5:19

year. That if tariffs stay at this

5:21

level, and I know this is crazy, but I

5:23

just I I want you to see the difference

5:25

between my mindset and what Waller is

5:27

saying and what Powell is saying, right?

5:29

So Powell will wait to see what the

5:30

impacts are. Kevin is saying, "All

5:33

right, the Fed won't cut in May or June,

5:35

but once we start getting some nasty

5:37

data July, September, November,

5:40

December, by the end of the year, it's

5:42

entirely possible that the Federal

5:44

Reserve actually cuts rates, again, this

5:46

is the crazy part, but all the way to

5:48

zero. In other words, we have so much

5:51

disinflation or even deflation, we need

5:53

to do everything in our power to stop

5:55

unemployment to minimize the pain of a

5:59

lengthy recession."

6:01

and then you try your best to prop the

6:03

economy up again. Now, it's usually at

6:06

that pivot point that I like investing

6:08

in stocks mostly because the stock

6:10

market tanks when unemployment really

6:13

starts suffering. But Waller, the most

6:16

dovish at the Fed, is telling you, hey,

6:19

we're not going to cut until employment

6:21

starts tanking. So, in other words, if

6:23

employment is solid now and the stock

6:25

market is recovering on, you know, hopes

6:27

of Waller, that's fine. But you still

6:29

have the unemployment drop to go. If

6:32

that happens, maybe that won't happen,

6:33

right? Uh then the Federal Reserve comes

6:36

in uh with with their their bailout. But

6:38

again, unemployment drops, stocks drop,

6:40

then the bailout happens, and then we

6:42

slowly start growing again. To me,

6:44

that's the environment I really like

6:46

going all in on stocks and getting

6:47

excited because we have the wind at our

6:49

back. We don't yet have the wind at our

6:51

back, but what we did here today is hope

6:53

that the wind will be at our back. So,

6:56

it's it's kind of this remarkable time

6:57

frame. But let's listen to some more of

6:59

what Waller said. So, uh, Waller told us

7:02

that, uh, he stressed, uh, Bloomberg

7:05

here in the interview suggests that he

7:06

didn't believe the impact of tariffs

7:08

would have a significant impact on the

7:10

economy before July, but after that

7:12

point, unemployment could rise and rise

7:14

quickly if tariffs again come into play.

7:17

He repeated the view that in the

7:19

inflationary impact of tariffs would

7:21

likely be temporary. Now, some parts of

7:24

markets hear temporary and think

7:26

transitory, but again, you have to think

7:28

about the flow of what tariffs do to

7:30

shutting an economy down. It's shock

7:33

that isn't offset by Congress sending

7:35

stimulus checks to everyone, which means

7:38

we compress prices down, unemployment

7:41

down, true pain hits. You know, the

7:43

earnings that we're getting now, like,

7:45

come on, Hasbro earnings beating. Okay,

7:48

because we're talking about Q1 and

7:50

people are pulling forward really good

7:52

numbers and then companies, a lot of

7:54

companies with the exceptions of

7:55

airlines are kind of

7:57

like, well, things haven't gone poopy

7:59

yet, so um guidance is fine. Yeah, all

8:03

right. We could bluff our way through

8:05

and pretend that tariffs aren't going to

8:06

have an impact. We could pretend and

8:08

continue to pretend that the Chinese are

8:11

actually negotiating with the Trump

8:13

administration. Trump says we are. The

8:14

Chinese say we're not. Somebody's

8:16

bluffing. Somebody's like, "Who cares?"

8:18

What we know is so far we still don't

8:20

have tariff trade deals with anyone. We

8:23

have rumors of trade deals which is

8:25

leading to bullish call option flow and

8:27

a lot of rumor mill that oh, you know,

8:30

time to buy because the trade deals are

8:31

going to get announced. And hopefully

8:32

that's true because there is also a

8:34

possibility that the stock market looks

8:37

through a 3-month period of damage that

8:40

tariffs cause once the tariffs are

8:42

solved. Mostly because the stock market

8:44

tends to be very forward-looking. And I

8:46

think that's why today we saw such a

8:48

movement in markets. It wasn't because

8:50

we actually got progress on a trade deal

8:53

because we didn't. It wasn't because we

8:55

continue to see diversifying into house

8:58

hack. House hack. Yeah. Uh which is

9:01

still happening. People are still

9:02

investing in house hack. They're getting

9:03

their 5%. They're getting upside on the

9:05

stock. Uh and they're getting downside

9:07

protection. I mean it's it's a great way

9:08

to diversify from the insanity of

9:11

tariffs and VC valuations and stock

9:13

market valuations. But anyway, uh that's

9:15

that househack.com now open to

9:16

nonacredit investors. What's remarkable

9:19

is what the market moved on today wasn't

9:22

really any good news other than this

9:26

Waller interview and hope. Now I'm not

9:28

bagging on that. It's if anything a good

9:32

sign because it means markets are

9:34

receptive to all right cool. So the Fed

9:37

is going to work with us. Consider for a

9:40

moment the interest rate curve. May

9:42

right now 8.4% 4% chance of a cut. June,

9:45

56% chance. July, 75%. Uh, and then by

9:50

September, we're already pricing in a

9:51

76% chance of two rate cuts with by

9:55

December us pricing in 3.4 cuts with a

9:59

64% chance. So, in other words, we're

10:01

still basically fully pricing in three

10:04

rate cuts. But that Paul or Pauler, oh

10:07

my gosh, I merged their names. Pauler,

10:10

Powell, and Waller. That's bizarre.

10:13

Anyway, that support for the economy is

10:16

actually what we want to hear. Now, the

10:19

downside is you have to wait for

10:20

unemployment to start having a poopy

10:22

dupy. There are a lot of people on

10:24

social media that complain about why did

10:26

the Fed cut 50 basis points when, you

10:28

know, right before the election, they

10:30

they tried to rig the election. Well,

10:31

because unemployment was triggering the

10:33

SOM rule and we were starting to have

10:35

serious economic fracturing on the

10:37

unemployment side of the equation. In

10:39

fact, some could argue that the slight

10:41

softening of rates and this assumes a

10:43

very quick responsiveness of rates,

10:44

which I I don't think we really have.

10:46

But some say that those rate cuts gave

10:48

enough wind at the back plus Trump

10:50

enthusiasm that we actually avoided that

10:52

we're we're coming close to stalling in

10:54

September and August and we actually

10:55

avoided a recession in the latter part

10:58

of last year because of enthusiasm and

11:00

that wind at our back. And so today is a

11:02

little bit of you know somebody kind of

11:04

blowing us okay blowing at our backs. Uh

11:07

the 102 spread still not fantastic. It's

11:11

um there you go 52. Uh but we're seeing

11:15

a lowering of of the curve on both sides

11:18

today. We saw the 10-year come down to

11:20

4.31. Uh we saw the 2-year move down to

11:24

what did we get on the 2-year? The

11:26

2-year today ended at 3.79. So almost

11:30

3.8. Uh and and a lot of this driven

11:33

again by enthusiasm from from Waller. Uh

11:37

now again, as much as it's possible that

11:39

Waller is just trying to raise his hand

11:41

to say, "Hey, pick me as the next Fed

11:43

chair," it is worth considering his

11:45

line, quote, "I'm willing to look

11:47

through tariff price increases." It's

11:49

going to take courage to stare down

11:51

tariff price increases and see them as

11:53

transitory. Rate cuts could come from

11:55

rising unemployment, and the Fed will

11:57

look at data to determine policy moves.

12:01

Uh in other words, we're, you know,

12:03

we're going to focus on the Fed mission

12:04

here. All right. So you what you again

12:08

have as a bottom line today like why

12:10

were things so euphoric today? Well,

12:12

you're still getting bullish Q1 data

12:14

from a lot of companies. You're still

12:17

getting bullish March data from

12:18

durables. It's not going to be until

12:20

July is in terms of when we really get

12:22

our bad data. So then we look and go,

12:25

okay, can the Fed cut them? Well, we're

12:27

probably teing up a September cut. And I

12:29

think the market is trying to frontr run

12:31

that right now, assuming the Federal

12:33

Reserve is going to bail us out before

12:34

we get a true bite of tariff damage. And

12:37

knock on wood, I hope that's true. For

12:39

me personally, I'm going to wait for the

12:41

point of the Federal Reserve panic

12:44

because I don't know what's going to

12:45

happen between now and then. And I've

12:47

got plenty of other options, mostly my

12:49

favorite being hack. And to us, if we go

12:52

into a recession, we've got, you know,

12:53

what 112 million to go buy the dip on a,

12:56

you know, company with with the assets

12:57

we have. That's actually a lot of cash.

12:59

Uh and uh and and if uh the market

13:02

doesn't go into recession, we keep doing

13:03

wedge deals. So, we're good either way.

13:05

So, I always say, don't copy what I'm

13:08

doing, but for me, what's going to get

13:10

me really motivated is when that Fed

13:12

starts panicking and U-turning because

13:14

that's historically what has always

13:15

represented a bottom. You look at Black

13:18

Monday Fed intervention in ' 87. You

13:21

look at the 2003, March of 2003 bottom

13:25

driven by the Federal Reserve. the

13:26

February of 2009, the December of 2018,

13:30

the March of

13:31

2020. These are all Fed policy U-turns.

13:35

Those are the moments that mark bottoms

13:37

historically. That's when I want to buy

13:39

because they usually are met during

13:41

shock periods when we get really bad

13:43

data, like bad unemployment data. And

13:45

remember the pain that we had in August?

13:47

It was unemployment data that turned

13:49

into a Japanese carry trade shock.

13:52

Something like that could happen again.

13:53

Anyway, thanks for watching. We'll see

13:55

you in the next one. Appreciate y'all.

13:56

Why not advertise these things that you

13:58

told us here? I feel like nobody else

13:59

knows about this. We'll we'll try a

14:01

little advertising and see how it goes.

14:02

Congratulations, man. You have done so

14:04

much. People love you. People look up to

14:05

you. Kevin Praat there, financial

14:07

analyst and YouTuber. Meet Kevin. Always

14:09

great to get your take.

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.