Trump *JUST* Bombed Iran.
FULL TRANSCRIPT
It's official. Donald Trump just struck
Iran. Three nuclear sites sites have
been struck. Esfahan, Natans, and Foro.
Now, Donald Trump says all American
airships uh are now in safe space
outside of Iranian airspace. My
expectation as it has been over the last
few days is that Donald Trump would
never actually announce ahead of time
that these strikes are going to occur
because they would jeopardize America
the American mission. It appears now the
mission is complete. Now what's very
interesting here is we have now struck
facilities that have already been struck
twice uh or actually multiple times by
the Israelis. Natans has been struck
repeatedly since almost day one of this
incursion. Uh this is one of your
uranium enrichment sites. Esvahan is
also an enrichment site, but what's
unique about Esphahan is it's a storage
facility uh for enriched uranium. At
least that's where it was last seen by
the IAEA inspectors who were allegedly
inspecting nuclear sites within Iran
multiple times per day up until the uh
Israeli strikes began. Now, Fordo, as
far as we're aware and have been told,
has not been struck by Israelis yet, but
just this morning, we put a video
together suggesting that the Israeli
military was clearing the path from the
Persian Gulf to the south of Iran, uh,
and likely where aircraft from the
United States would enter the Iranian
airspace from potentially Qatar or the
Saudi Saudi Arabian Peninsula or
wherever else.
It all lines now that strikes have taken
place today. Obviously, it is Saturday.
It's a weekend. Bitcoin has fallen to
about 101, which is just below its 102
uh support line. So, we're seeing some
negative market reaction. This does mean
the United States has stepped foot into
this war of Iran versus Israel. And
questions now are, is this it? Donald
Trump suggests that the next best phase
is a peaceful next phase. That is
hopefully we can return to peace. This
was my these were in my scenarios with
my course members in the alpha report
and we've talked about this on the
channel as well. Uh so my best case
scenario in you know when we we set up
trading scenarios we say okay if this
then this right so for example we might
say like hey if circle goes down in the
first 5 minutes of trade be prepared to
pick up a bounce on it because it's it
could shoot up 20%. It's exactly what
happened on Friday for example. You
could look at the history of it. You go
look at the alpha report history of it
in the course member livereams. But the
point is we gave scenarios for best case
scenario. Best case scenario number one
was a negotiated solution. Obviously
some form of capitulation from Iran that
they would stop enriching prior to
strikes from the United States. KA
obviously made it very clear this
morning uh that the negotiations in
Geneva were not acceptable. started
allocating and delicating delegating
replacements to himself as well as
others in the uh Iranian military uh and
the Iranian revolutionary guard should
they be taken out suggesting this really
like heel digging in by Iran this idea
of all right look we're not going to go
to zero enrichment these deals that were
being offered in Geneva are not good
we're not interested in these
negotiations so we're just going to set
up and dig in here unfortunately uh that
came at the same time as we were
bringing more B2 bombers into the
region. So, unsurprisingly, we were
negotiations weren't going anywhere and
we were basically walking up towards
these strikes occurring which have now
officially been carried out. Now, we've
talked about Esvahan. Uh we don't know
if the 15 barrels of highlyenriched
uranium are actually at Esvahan. We
don't know if they have now been
destroyed through the bombs that the
United States has dropped. It is
expected that the United States is
basically coming in as the mop-up clue
crew. So in other words, we are striking
in a manner that the Israelis cannot.
The Israelis take out anti-aircraft
launchers such as SAM surfaceto-air
missile facilities or vehicles. Uh and
then also prepare a path for B2 bombers.
B2 bombers get refueled off the coast of
Iran. Very normal. Uh yes, a B2 bomber
fully loaded without bombs. In other
words, fully fueled without bombs could
make it to Iran from a significant
distance. However, once you're carrying
30,000lb bombs, this is a little
different. Now, we're going to have to
wait and see what kind of footage comes
out of the actual bombardments, but
Donald Trump suggests that these strikes
have been successful. I would suspect
there were likely uh in the neighborhood
to hit three different sites. We're
probably looking at somewhere between 6
to 12 B2 bombers that were used in this
attack. Each dropping about two bombs
along with potentially also F-16s, which
we've already seen building up uh in
Saudi Arabia uh in bases that the United
States and Allied forces can operate in.
So, what does this mean? Well, we talked
Espahan. Potentially, some of the
enriched uranium, had it not been moved,
is now destroyed. Generally, enriched
uranium is not considered a nuclear
hazard for fallout purposes. So less of
a concern there. Uh Natans has already
been bombarded pretty heavily. So it's
likely that just got finished off. Now
the strike on Fordo we've been talking
about for about a week now. This uh
should uh be based on what we're hearing
the first strike on fore. And it's
basically the initial strike and the
final strike. So now the question is so
first best case scenario was a
negotiated solution before strikes.
Second best case scenario is a
negotiated solution after strikes. What
we're hoping for now and sorry if I have
food in my teeth. I'm literally I
stepped out of a wedding because I saw
these strikes were taking place. So what
happens when you have notifications on
for truth social and uh a shout out to
uh the team as well for being like Kevin
are you on this? Anyway, so now the you
know first case scenario didn't work
out. Negotiated solution before strikes
that didn't happen. Best next case
scenario is a negotiated solution post
strikes. This is where Ron basically
says okay look we effed up we give up.
we will go to zero enrichment because
again you have to remember and I
understand this is sort of boring like
science but you have to understand if
you enrich U235
for peaceful purposes you could also use
that U235 for weapons you can't start a
nuclear a peaceful nuclear program you
can't start the fision reactions without
U235 you can have a bunch you can have
97% U238 but you need that 3% U235. So
you need that 235 uh nuclear uh energy
grade and weapons grade uranium which
you have to refine through centrifugal
processes.
Even a peaceful program yields a
plutonium U239 sorry plutonium 239 which
can also be used in weapons. So the
component in a peaceful energy program
can be used for weapons. the byproduct
of a peaceful energy program can be used
in weapons. And then obviously you could
just use straight up U235 for weapons
themselves. So now best case scenario is
Iran backs down and says, "Well, we're
done. We won't enrich anymore. You got
us. You hit us hard. Done." A lot of
people have been asking me how how could
they have potentially struck? Because
it's not just a 2D surface of knowing
where to strike where a spy, you know,
basically paints a spot, a GPS
coordinate, and you strike that spot. It
is also a third dimension of knowing how
deep to go. You have to get through
potential false cavities, false tunnels.
Uh, and you have to make sure the bomb
doesn't go too far. Otherwise, even a
30,000lb bomb, which is mostly metal.
25,000 lb of it are metal. 5,000 lb of
the actual warhead, you have to actually
target that to detonate at the right
threedimensional depth. I suspect it's
likely that the United States had
satellite imagery of when these sites
were constructed and basically went into
the archives to say, "Oh, okay. Yeah, we
we know exactly what's going where?" And
that's how these strikes were carried
out in a successful manner. Now, then
again, we also have to evaluate, were
the strikes really successful? Because
everything Trump does is successful.
Okay, his words. So, we kind of have to
take that with a little bit of a grain
of salt. But let's assume for a moment
that the strikes were not successful.
very embarrassing for Donald Trump. It
is possible Iran could argue that the
strikes were not successful and this
would go into a thirdcase scenario,
which is not one of our first or second
best case scenarios. It is a worst case
scenario and it is a situation where
Iran says, "Your strikes failed. You
didn't get our stuff. Now we're
definitely making a bomb." This is bad
because it potentially leads to a
protracted war, prolonged war or
conflict. And then of course worst case
scenario number four is some form of
actual troop deployment to verify or
commando supported deployment by the
Israelis supported by the US to verify
that the job is complete and the
Iranians are not uh enriching uranium.
Notice none of what I'm saying is regime
change. You don't want regime change
because then you have a we've talked
about this so much. I'm sorry. I feel
like this is redundant very as quickly
as possible.
If you take out a regime, you leave a
power vacuum. Who's going to replace it?
you going to somehow orchestrate
elections like you did in Iraq? Nobody's
going to trust the elections. Are you
going to put the Israeli uh uh military
uh in position? Nobody's going to trust
them or believe that. And you got a
Galaza 2.0. Nobody wants that. You going
to take a US assigned government? Nobody
wants that either. So, the people would
have to elect a government and trust
that election process. It just hasn't
been successfully done. What's better is
that the regime realizes, all right,
we're not going to enrich uranium. We
step back. So the question now is how
bad is the response going to be? And
that's what we have to see. Hopefully
the strikes indeed now that they have
been carried out, hopefully the strikes
were indeed successful. If they were
indeed successful, then yes, we can get
to a negotiated solution.
If Iran is open to it, let's hope
because if not, we get into a situation
where oil skyrockets over 100.
Potentially, we get retaliation in the
straight of hero shutting down. Uh and
now we're in a situation where oil is
over 100, over 125. We start getting
into recessionary territory based on
consumer purchasing power going in an
environment where employment is already
very weak. Now that's not existing
unemployment levels. It would be the
level of hiring. Hiring is very weak,
job vacancies are weak. So it's a rough
time. It's a sensitive time for the
economy to try to absorb more of this
sort of damage. So I'll just have to
wait and see what happens. Follow for
more. I will keep you updated. Thank you
so much.
UNLOCK MORE
Sign up free to access premium features
INTERACTIVE VIEWER
Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.
AI SUMMARY
Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.
TRANSLATE
Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.
MIND MAP
Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.
CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT
Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.
GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS
Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.