White House & FBI BOMBSHELL Censorship: WORSE Than Feared.

you know I didn't really think it was

possible for there to be more Twitter

files yet there are and in this video

I'm going to give you a short breakdown

of the latest Twitter files release keep

in mind we have seen everything from the

FBI actively censoring satire on

Election Day via Twitter to the FBI

paying Twitter over three and a half

million dollars in reimbursements for

Twitter's efforts to help censor things

the FBI wanted censored or visibility

filter fancy way of saying Shadow

Banning we have also seen from within

Twitter an effort tied stories that were

about true discoveries like the hunter

Biden laptop all under the direction of

politicians and the more donations that

were funneled to politicians from

individuals within Twitter the more

connections were built between

politicians and employees within Twitter

and the title those connections were the

more censorship was possible today

things go a little bit further and

that's what we're going to reveal in

today's Twitter files where I've picked

out the most Salient pieces of the

latest Twitter files drop such as the

following where the Trump White House

allegedly sought to combat

misinformation about quote runs on

grocery stores which is a way of saying

grocery stores might run out of a

product if people continue to stock up

the way they were during the beginning

of the covet pandemic which you might

remember we did have runs on grocery

stores we ran out of toilet paper for

example at the beginning of the pandemic

and here you can see the Trump White

House called for help from tech

companies to combat misinformation

including runs on grocery stores so this

isn't only Democrats who are looking to

censor things that were inconvenient to

their Administration but it was also so

the Trump campaign though Trump

specifically in this Twitter files ends

up being targeted by the FBI now we also

see here it's not just Twitter that was

involved in this Google Facebook

Microsoft and other big tech companies

were involved as well and a lot of these

were conspiracies as of just really uh

you know a few months ago all the big

Tech collusion and censorship campaigns

were deemed to be conspiracies and sort

of right wing Fringe theories and uh

Elon Musk said it well just a few days

ago when on the all-in podcast he says

you know it's interesting that almost

every single one of the conspiracy

theories about Twitter turned out to be

true and this just gives us some example

here where for example we see when the

bid Administration took over one of

their first meeting requests with

Twitter Executives was on covid and the

focus was on anti-vaxxer accounts right

here as you could say per regular

process public policy took the meeting

Biden staff focused on vaccine and high

profile anti-vaxxer accounts including

Alex Berenson now that's interesting

here especially since you can see that

barrancy baronson sued Twitter and

eventually settled with Twitter and as a

result of that lawsuit documents came

out showing things like Twitter messages

through slack hey how was the White

House meeting overall pretty good they

had one really tough question about why

Alex Berenson hadn't been kicked off the

platform otherwise their questions were

appointed but fair so interesting you

can kind of see some of the the

tenseness between a Twitter almost

trying to say like hey hey like this is

going a little bit too far and the

pressures of the White House which you

would think should stand for Free Speech

but instead is actually actively trying

to limit free speech

in fact you could see me see here that

the Biden team was not satisfied with

Twitter's enforcement approach as they

wanted Twitter to do more and to

de-platform several accounts you know

it's interesting that free speech today

has uh turned into uh something that's

that's uh very very vilifying and that I

think everybody agrees we should have

free speech uh but uh you know if

somebody interviews somebody or allows

somebody to speak that someone else

disagree with or disagrees with all of a

sudden it's called platforming and if

you platform somebody with an opinion

that you don't like well then maybe that

person should be de-platformed and it's

it's so such an interesting like Duality

so let's clarify that thought for a

month how on one hand can we say oh we

want free speech but then criticize

people for platforming people with

another opinion you know this is

basically to say people should be able

to share their opinion and interviews on

podcasts on Twitter or whatever they

shouldn't be de-platformed if we are to

stand for Free Speech but the same thing

actually happens pretty commonly

especially on YouTube for example I've

had some controversial figures that I've

interviewed on my YouTube channel I'll

give an example somebody who is

according to Wikipedia deemed to be a

right-wing extremist and a white

supremacist the person individually

disagrees with both of these

characteristics but I've personally

interviewed somebody like Lauren

Southern on this YouTube channel and I

had a you know I basically had an

unbiased interview with them you could

look it up yourself and wanted to hear

their side of the story but I was

actually personally berated for

platforming such a person which is so

ironic because on one hand we all agree

on Free Speech but then if we platform

somebody that's bad the same thing

really extends here to Twitter right if

we are to truly stand for free speech

then we should be okay okay with people

being platformed right people having the

opportunity to speak to stand up in the

Public Square and speak as long as

obviously they're not breaking the law

right but I do think it's remarkable how

much pressure uh and I can imagine that

pressure being very great coming from

the White House especially like that's

supposed to be an institution that at

least as children were taught like this

is that's like the big leagues that's

the top of the country right is that's

the symbol of America and freedom when

the reality is in practice it's actually

now become the symbol of Oppression and

censorship and D platforming it's really

disgusting like it turns what we what we

learned as children on its head really

sad Twitter Executives did not fully

capitulate to the Biden team wishes an

extensive review of internal

Communications that the company revealed

employees often debated moderation cases

in great detail and with more care than

was shown by the government towards Free

Speech this is actually a defense of

Twitter here showing that Twitter was

working harder to preserve Free Speech

than our very own government

but Twitter did ultimately suppress

views for many doctors and scientific

experts that conflicted with the

official positions of of the White House

as a result legitimate findings and

questions that would have expanded the

public debate went missing and this is

bad because when you remove sort of one

person's potential criticism uh that

then you remove potential further review

of of studies right keep in mind that

most studies

end with a paragraph and it's sort of

like a catch-all liability release but

they end with a paragraph that generally

says hey this is the result that we

achieved in our study but we recommend

further studies right so on one hand you

have people who conduct studies saying

hey we want more studies

but then if people reply to let's say a

study and they're like hey like what

about this this deserves some more you

know looking into basically if that hey

this deserves some more looking into is

censored then we actually destroy the

scientific process really really scary

and it's sad because

I hate to say it but

the politicians uh have been more the

the politicians who have been most vocal

about doing what science encourages

uh frankly more of those from the Biden

Edmund and and on the left uh have been

more active at actually destroying the

scientific method

by censoring that's scary and we'll go

through some examples in just a moment

so there were and then they you know

they talk a little bit about here the

Reliance on Bots and and contractors in

the Philippines for moderation how this

was a problem

uh I I could see that you know certainly

language barriers potentially but then

they give some examples here here's a

Harvard Medical School doctor an

epidemiologist who who you think should

have you know uh the right to speak uh

saying here

that thinking that everyone must be

vaccinated is as scientifically flawed

as thinking that nobody should covet

vaccines are important for older

high-risk people and their caretakers

those with prior natural infection do

not need it nor children this is

actually now right it seems like a very

reasonable statement yet what ended up

happening well what ended up happening

is look at this email internal email

heads up sending a heads up that we will

take action on this tweet for violating

our coveted misinformation policy

specifically by sharing false

information in regards to the efficacy

of covid-19 vaccines which goes against

CDC guidelines that's insane so that

person's tweet ended up getting flagged

and listen to this this tweet cannot be

replied to shared or liked I mean if you

can't share it

or like it or comment on it you have

destroyed the scientific process

you prevent the idea from spreading to

other individuals for more dialogue and

you prevent dialogue at all

it's shocking

on the other hand you've got somebody

here who's a self-proclaimed claimed

Public Health fact Checker uh who argues

that hey you know why are we allowing

something like this to stand without

censorship this stat here or this this

uh tweet here says here's some data

since December of 2021 covet has been

the leading cause of death from disease

in children and this person replies this

is cherry picking this is only like

covet is only the leading cause of death

if you ignore all non-disease deaths

accidents right and you ignore cancer

heart disease SIDS and then all of a

sudden covet is the leading cause of

death and they actually provide

statistics now we should be able to

analyze those statistics and say hey are

these are these correct like is Cali

correct or is the other tweet person you

know a person tweeting correct but we

can't because Twitter then steps in and

censors that and doesn't allow replies

or shares or uh or likes

here's another one where some an account

called infectious disease ethics plotted

the rise in cases of cardiac arrests and

myocarditis in 16 to 39 year olds AKA

younger people and they plot the rise of

covet cases here

and then the rise in incidents of uh

cardiac arrest and myocarditis

and and they make the argument that

there are some correlations between the

vaccine and cardiac arrest and

myocarditis and this is a very

concerning chart there's a very

reasonable uh linkage to myocarditis and

and the covet vaccine in fact this is

why

uh there there's uh look I'm not a nurse

but there is there's this idea that

when you provide a shot you're supposed

to I believe it's called aerate the shot

by uh by basically pulling back on the

plunger a little bit to see if there's

any blood going into the uh syringe and

if there is blood in the syringe the the

needle should be removed I believe

discarded and a new one should be

attempted and then should be checked

again did you hit a blood vessel uh and

the reason for this is if if you get

blood in and then you inject the vaccine

That vaccine then can fact Fast Track

basically to the heart muscle and uh the

the compounds in That vaccine at higher

doses could cause problems for the heart

muscle

so there's like actually uh like

application issue here that could

actually be leading to the rise of these

these problems so there's some

legitimacy to this uh potentially a lot

of legitimacy to this and this is

something that should be shared and

talked about right uh now I don't think

anybody should say like with certainty

one thing is right one thing is wrong

but that's literally what Twitter was

doing

by labeling stuff as misleading and then

again can't even reply to it

like if I'm like hey this is correct

because of this or I think this is wrong

because of this I couldn't even reply to

it because Twitter said you're not

allowed to talk about that that's messed

up

it's messed up and there are more and

more examples of censorship and reveals

of how like strikes were were

implemented but shouldn't have been uh

again more examples here's one this was

probably the most damning one uh and no

it's not that the coupon code expires

today on flying with me in a private jet

uh as we Shadow each other or you Shadow

me to learn about real estate or the

coupon for the educational programs I'm

building your wealth those options are

linked down below but instead it is that

Donald Trump here mentions that you

should not be afraid of coven which is

actually you know an optimistic thing

right it's providing hope for people

it's it's you know uh it's not saying

that you shouldn't be careful it's just

saying look don't let it dominate your

life you know I think this is uh this is

in a dark time a fair thing to say uh to

some extent you know some people are

gonna go I don't know does that make

people be less cautious well let that be

a debate right

but Jim Baker who used to work at the

FBI right before the election here does

not think there should be a debate Jim

Baker says why isn't this President of

the United States tweet a violation of

our covid-19 policy especially don't be

afraid of covet statement

come on man

there was actually a reply to this

in short this tweet is a broad

optimistic statement it doesn't incite

people to do something harmful nor does

it recommend against taking precautions

or following medical directives it

doesn't fall within the published scope

of our policies curiously a curious

whether you have a different read on it

though it's like here's a former FBI guy

with my sense on the president

this is scary

you know uh and uh there's even evidence

here that Twitter did prioritize the

review and labeling of content that

could lead to increased exposure of

transmission of of the virus it's just

it's really incredible it's really

really sad uh and it's so good that this

is now coming to light as they say

sunlight is the best disinfectant and

boy oh boy has there been some

disinfecting to do now you just wonder

what's going on at Facebook and uh you

know some other platforms but uh

knock on wood I haven't had one of my

videos censored since January 5th when I

covered Donald Trump's speech right

before the January 6th

um

capital

disaster

anyway

thank you so much for watching this

video good luck out there