⚠️ Some features may be temporarily unavailable due to an ongoing 3rd party provider issue. We apologize for the inconvenience and expect this to be resolved soon.
TRANSCRIPTEnglish

i just got wrecked by California

7m 5s1,225 words179 segmentsEnglish

FULL TRANSCRIPT

0:00

hey everyone me Kevin here so you're

0:01

probably wondering how court went today

0:03

and uh let's just say it started out

0:06

really interestingly the attorney who

0:08

was representing me was told that he

0:10

didn't have standing to represent me and

0:13

we had to pull a fast one on the judge

0:16

or or with obviously the judge's

0:18

approval so I suppose it's not really

0:19

fast one on the judge but we had a ball

0:20

fast one and uh essentially tell the

0:23

judge that my attorney was fired

0:25

and that I would stand in and represent

0:28

myself see I wasn't actually allowed in

0:31

the zoom courtroom the only the

0:33

attorneys were allowed in so it was two

0:35

attorneys in the judge

0:37

and uh the the judge authorized

0:40

basically the removal of my attorney and

0:43

then the replacement with me

0:45

to present my own case so here I am with

0:48

no legal experience presenting my own

0:50

case

0:51

and the judge starts with I'm inclined

0:54

to deny your case because of a rule 70

0:58

or 2716 of the elections code and I'm

1:03

like no problem I got this I know

1:06

exactly where you're going with this

1:07

because I got a whole thing ready for

1:09

you no I didn't say that but I said well

1:11

your honor could I present my case with

1:14

my iPad in a flowchart and she's like uh

1:16

what so kind of just like how he got

1:20

through stimulus bills we go here you go

1:23

here you go your honor here are my

1:25

arguments let's keep it nice and simple

1:26

in fact let me jump on over over to this

1:28

one it's a little easier this was the

1:29

one that I used in uh in court and I

1:31

said look your honor it's very simple

1:33

our opponents our opposing counsel argue

1:36

that a brand is not allowed on the

1:39

ballot and so we made the argument that

1:41

it's very important to know that a brand

1:43

is an umbrella phrase a brand could

1:45

represent a product something you use a

1:47

service something that's done for you or

1:50

a personal identity or a nickname but

1:53

nicknames are allowed on the ballot so

1:54

if nicknames are allowed on the ballot

1:56

then technically a form of a brand is

1:58

allowed on the ballot and I gave the

2:00

examples of like for example Trump is a

2:02

brand or Larry King is a nickname right

2:06

his full name is like Lawrence Harvey

2:09

zeiger or something like that anyway

2:11

then we made a second argument and that

2:14

was legal precedent that the secretary

2:16

of state had previously allowed a Sumo

2:19

wrestler's name to be on the ballot as

2:22

the Sumo wrestler's personal identity so

2:24

Kurt takakazi rightmeyer got on the

2:27

ballot and takakazi means wind from a

2:31

Sword stroke Sumo name per L.A time so

2:34

in other words this person got their

2:35

brand on the ballot in 2013. now the

2:39

judge initially said hey I'm declined to

2:41

deny this because of 2716 I'm like

2:45

it's part of my argumentation don't

2:46

worry I already know where you're going

2:48

with it see code 27 716 says that you

2:53

cannot put a trademark or brand name

2:55

into your ballot designation well when

2:58

you're on a ballot you get two things

3:00

you get your name like this Kurt

3:02

takikaze rightmeyer and you get a

3:06

designation which is independent middle

3:07

rate sumo wrestler and the argument of

3:10

the law is that you can't put like CEO

3:12

of Target or CEO of Apple into the

3:14

designation but that's not what we're

3:15

doing we're putting Financial educator

3:17

and analyst in so I made the argument

3:19

that I just want my name the nickname

3:23

and stage name on the ballot just like

3:25

Kurt had before me this is this is where

3:29

branding is actually not outlawed like

3:32

the law does not say you cannot have a

3:34

brand in here in fact the opposing

3:36

Council themselves said that stage names

3:39

are totally okay to be on the ballot

3:42

wasn't that what me Kevin is and

3:45

remember I'm trying to be on the ballot

3:46

as Kevin

3:49

meet Kevin I'll just put MK and then my

3:52

last name pafrath right that's it's not

3:54

like I'm not trying to put my last name

3:56

on there right anyway so I told the

3:58

judge this lawsuit is not about balik

4:00

designations

4:02

so therefore you cannot use the law

4:06

2716 to say that I'm not allowed to have

4:09

my name on the ballot because this has

4:11

to do with ballot designations not uh

4:14

where the names are

4:16

and then I made the fourth argument that

4:19

those of you who responded to my polls

4:21

made it very clear that you know me as

4:23

meat Kevin you watch me as me Kevin if

4:26

you saw me on the street you'd reference

4:27

me as meet Kevin if someone asked you

4:29

who you're voting for you'd say meet

4:30

Kevin and the opposing Council tried to

4:33

make the argument that Fox News never

4:37

called me meet Kevin when in reality if

4:39

you look at my meet Kevin meets Kennedy

4:41

interview she literally at two minutes

4:43

and 11 seconds in says the word and to

4:45

that I say yes meet Kevin

4:49

so I made this complete argument

4:51

that's essentially the Crux of our case

4:53

here

4:54

remember the judge went into this case

4:56

wanting to deny the case

4:58

and the judge

5:00

said towards the end she which which my

5:04

attorneys who were watching said I've

5:05

never seen a judge say this which is

5:07

really cool I appreciated that but she

5:09

essentially said that I did a really

5:10

good job and she's like do you have some

5:12

kind of legal background because it was

5:13

really organized and like really good or

5:14

whatever and I'm like I'm not trying to

5:16

Pat myself on the back but it's like

5:17

thank you I know because I've been just

5:19

living and breathing this case like I I

5:21

know that meet Kevin is my name

5:25

and then she promptly ruled against me

5:31

uh so my my attorneys mentioned that

5:35

good luck in Sacramento getting a judge

5:38

like we had here who's apparently trying

5:41

to get promoted I don't know they said

5:42

something about trying to get promoted

5:44

by Gavin Newsom and you're a Democrat

5:46

running against the Democratic party and

5:49

Newsome you're basically running against

5:50

the party like you expect the judge to

5:52

rule in your favor even if you have the

5:54

best arguments in the world like good

5:55

luck I'm like oh well I I okay I mean

5:58

that that doesn't sound free and fair

6:00

that that sounds like censorship to me

6:03

that sounds like putting the competition

6:05

down

6:06

and then I asked well what about appeals

6:08

and my attorneys say well appeals are

6:10

even worse they're even more partisan so

6:14

they basically rubber stamp whatever the

6:17

government wants

6:18

so in other words

6:20

I got screwed

6:23

he really sucks because even though you

6:26

think

6:27

the law is on your side and you're just

6:29

trying to provide transparent Clarity to

6:31

people

6:32

that Hey Kevin pavroth is me Kevin

6:34

because that's who you know me as like

6:36

it would be with my last name it's been

6:37

done before

6:39

apparently because it comes across as a

6:41

brand

6:42

uh I get shafted

6:45

so a big warning shot to all influencers

6:47

out there

6:49

use your real name if you ever want to

6:50

get involved

6:53

[Music]

UNLOCK MORE

Sign up free to access premium features

INTERACTIVE VIEWER

Watch the video with synced subtitles, adjustable overlay, and full playback control.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

AI SUMMARY

Get an instant AI-generated summary of the video content, key points, and takeaways.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

TRANSLATE

Translate the transcript to 100+ languages with one click. Download in any format.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

MIND MAP

Visualize the transcript as an interactive mind map. Understand structure at a glance.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

CHAT WITH TRANSCRIPT

Ask questions about the video content. Get answers powered by AI directly from the transcript.

SIGN UP FREE TO UNLOCK

GET MORE FROM YOUR TRANSCRIPTS

Sign up for free and unlock interactive viewer, AI summaries, translations, mind maps, and more. No credit card required.