トランスクリプトEnglish

'HEINOUS CRIME' — Top Democrat Caught In One Of Sleaziest Scandals Yet

9m 22s1,608 単語240 segmentsEnglish

全トランスクリプト

0:01

Welcome back to Explain America. This is

0:03

your host, Kyle Becker. Do Democrats

0:05

respect the American people at all? It's

0:07

a burning question on the top of

0:09

people's minds, especially given all of

0:11

the fraud scandals involving top

0:13

Democrats that have come to light in

0:15

recent weeks. Now, we've talked about

0:17

Ilhan Omar and her problems with the

0:20

Somali fraud scandal. We've talked about

0:22

AOC and her campaign f finance problems.

0:25

But one of the big stories to come out

0:27

in the last few days has been involving

0:29

California Congressman Eric Swallwell.

0:32

Now Swallwell, as we know, we've been

0:34

following him uh for years now since

0:37

Axios broke the huge story that Fang

0:39

Fang and Eric Swallwell, while they had

0:42

some intimate relations and uh that may

0:45

have compromised him. though he lost his

0:48

position on the House Intelligence

0:50

Committee uh years ago and uh ever since

0:53

the Democrats have been trying to

0:54

rehabilitate his image as someone who is

0:58

essentially just misunderstood and he's

1:00

a swell guy. Well, according to social

1:02

media reports in the last few days that

1:06

have come to light, he is not a good

1:08

guy. And uh well, I'm going to leave it

1:11

to you to hunt that down on X where

1:13

there are women coming forward saying

1:15

that Eric Swallwell, well, he has some

1:17

inappropriate behavior issues. And of

1:19

course, those aren't verified. Those

1:20

need to be proven in a court of law. So,

1:23

uh we're not going to take that as an

1:24

absolute fact. But what we can say with

1:27

absolute certainty is that Eric

1:29

Swallwell on its face is guilty of

1:33

redirecting campaign funds back to him

1:35

and his family. This is an illicit fraud

1:37

scheme and we'll break it down soon. But

1:39

before we do, please like, share, and

1:40

comment at Explained America. Join us.

1:43

We appreciate your support for common

1:44

sense journalism. Now, what is it about

1:46

the modern Democratic Party that it is

1:48

very attractive indeed for grifters? It

1:51

could be that they flock together no

1:53

matter what. If any scandal hits the

1:55

headlines, they can be sure that the

1:57

lamestream media is going to run cover

1:59

for them because they aren't interested

2:01

in doing actual investigative journalism

2:03

if it involves a Democrat. Well,

2:06

unfortunately for them, there's a rise

2:07

of citizen journalism, and it's catching

2:09

on quite nicely on social media

2:12

platforms. So, there's no longer a

2:14

strangle hold on the news like it used

2:17

to be. The corporate media has its own

2:19

role in this ecosystem, but it is no

2:22

longer the only player in town. It's no

2:24

longer an echo chamber. And we can find

2:26

out a lot of interesting facts about our

2:28

politicians that the corporate media

2:30

would rather they not know about. So, we

2:34

have a report that's come to light, and

2:36

it looks fairly rock solid from my uh

2:39

estimation, and that is that Eric

2:40

Swallwell funneled $200,000 from his

2:43

campaign directly back to himself.

2:45

>> Eric Swallwell funneled $200,000 from

2:47

his campaign directly back to himself,

2:50

claiming he used the money on child

2:52

care. According to FEC filings from 2019

2:55

to 2025, this includes more than $22,000

2:59

in just the final three months of last

3:01

year. In addition, three payments

3:03

totaling over $6,000 were made out to

3:06

his wife, Brittney Swallwell, labeled as

3:09

quote unquote child care. Critics say

3:11

this is a deception as people do not

3:13

donate to campaign so the candidate can

3:15

spend that money on personal expenses,

3:18

essentially using their campaign funds

3:20

as a personal slush fund. Campaign

3:22

finance watchd dogs have slammed the

3:24

move, saying there's a privileged class

3:26

of politicians who exploit loopholes to

3:28

pay for their lifestyles with donor

3:30

cash. This isn't Swallwell's first

3:32

controversy with campaign spending. In

3:34

fact, his FEC records show that he used

3:37

campaign cash for nearly $22,000

3:41

on quote unquote event tickets to the

3:43

San Francisco 49ers in February of 2024,

3:46

labeled as fundraising. He was at the

3:49

Super Bowl where he also spent an

3:51

additional $100 in campaign cash on

3:53

stadium concessions. thousands more on

3:56

luxury items like limousine services,

3:58

high-end steakhouse dinners, and alcohol

4:01

deliveries, prompting a 2021 FEC

4:03

complaint from the American

4:04

Accountability Foundation, which accused

4:07

him of converting campaign funds into

4:10

personal use. Over $50,000 in total

4:13

event tickets to NFL games, including a

4:16

$1,560

4:18

dispersement for a 49ers Eagles matchup

4:21

in December of 2023.

4:24

Now, he claimed in part of these uh

4:28

finance funds that he was using the

4:30

money for child care. And if you go

4:33

through the FEC filings from 2019 to

4:35

2025, three of the payments total over

4:38

$6,000 and they were made out to his

4:41

wife Brittany Swallwell and they are

4:43

labeled as child care. Very interesting

4:48

indeed. And so this report comes on top

4:51

of other investigations into his alleged

4:54

corruption. And the FBI, as you might

4:57

know, has officially opened uh the

5:00

espionage case involving Swallwell.

5:02

That's the one that has to do with Fang

5:04

Fang and her alleged role in all of

5:06

this. And of course, we're waiting for

5:08

them to get to the bottom of that. And

5:10

not just that, to hold these Democrats

5:12

accountable. Eric Swellwell, of course,

5:15

he comes across as very sleazy and uh

5:18

he's certainly uh someone who pushes a

5:21

lot of lies. And the very interesting

5:23

footnote about all of this is that

5:25

Attorney General Pam Bondi, well, she's

5:27

no longer attorney general. She was

5:29

reshuffled inside the Department of

5:31

Justice to a lower position, right? And

5:34

uh she was apparently friends with

5:36

Suwell and tipped him off about this

5:38

investigation. I think that tells us

5:40

about everything we need to know about

5:42

Bam Bondi. Uh why she would be friends

5:44

with Eric Swwell or would tip him off

5:46

about an investigation is beyond me.

5:49

It's quite bewildering how these uh

5:52

uniarty creatures they uh act like it's

5:54

a giant club and their job is to fleece

5:56

us and to pull the wool over our eyes

5:58

and uh enough is enough. You know, the

6:00

foot dragging and the obstruction of

6:02

justice and uh the attempt to run out

6:05

the clock and gaslight us and all of

6:07

these other things. If someone is guilty

6:08

of breaking the law, they need to face

6:10

justice. And uh if this doesn't happen,

6:13

then we have zero confidence in our

6:14

institutions. So maybe that's the point

6:16

of it. It's hard to say at this

6:19

juncture. However, we would like to see

6:21

a few of these Democrats who are guilty

6:23

of violations that could be proven in a

6:25

court of law to actually get hammered.

6:29

Not just because they are guilty of the

6:31

law, but it will discourage others from

6:34

breaking the law and from being corrupt

6:36

actors. This is just common sense. I

6:38

mean, if you have a child and they go to

6:41

the oven and they're playing with it and

6:43

they're turning the fire on, uh, you

6:45

tell them no and, uh, you know, you tell

6:48

them no a number of times and they keep

6:50

going back and playing with fire and

6:51

eventually they're going to burn

6:52

themselves, right? So, this is common

6:55

sense and enough is enough with this.

6:57

Uh, human nature is what it is and we

7:00

have to deal with it sensibly and so

7:01

that means that lawb breakakers need to

7:03

be punished for their actions. Okay,

7:06

this is not unreasonable. This is a

7:08

standard of justice that has existed in

7:10

western civilization for centuries and

7:13

uh going away from it now over partisan

7:15

politics. Well, it's a suicide pact

7:17

because once law and order breaks down

7:19

this country, we're not going to have

7:20

anything to stabilize us and to have a

7:23

civil society. It will be an absolute

7:26

free-for-all. And I don't think any

7:28

sensible person should want that. So,

7:31

weigh in with your thoughts about this

7:32

story. We always appreciate hearing from

7:33

you at Explained America. Breaking just

7:36

a moment ago, Fox can now confirm that

7:38

California Democrat Congressman Eric

7:40

Swallwell has been criminally referred

7:43

to the Department of Justice accused of

7:46

mortgage fraud. Senior White House

さらにアンロック

無料でサインアップしてプレミアム機能にアクセス

インタラクティブビューア

字幕を同期させ、オーバーレイを調整し、完全な再生コントロールでビデオを視聴できます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

AI要約

動画コンテンツ、キーポイント、および重要なポイントのAI生成された要約を即座に取得します。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

翻訳

ワンクリックでトランスクリプトを100以上の言語に翻訳します。任意の形式でダウンロードできます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

マインドマップ

トランスクリプトをインタラクティブなマインドマップとして視覚化します。構造を一目で理解できます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

トランスクリプトとチャット

動画コンテンツについて質問します。AIを利用してトランスクリプトから直接回答を得られます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

トランスクリプトをもっと活用する

無料でサインアップして、インタラクティブビューア、AI要約、翻訳、マインドマップなどをアンロックしてください。クレジットカードは不要です。

    'HEINOUS CRIME' — Top Democrat… - 全文書き起こし | YouTubeTranscript.dev