トランスクリプトEnglish

Two Millionaires on the Worst Mistakes They Made Early

1h 11m 21s16,462 単語2,262 segmentsEnglish

全トランスクリプト

0:00

All right, it's a new year, but it's the

0:02

same old us. And we wanted to do

0:04

something for you guys. So, we wanted to

0:05

do a mailbag of fan questions. So,

0:08

people have written in questions. We are

0:10

going to answer them. You ready to jump

0:12

in, Sam?

0:13

>> Yeah.

0:19

>> All right. Here we go. Question number

0:21

one. What is the biggest mistake you've

0:23

made in your business that you have not

0:24

spoken about publicly yet? And how has

0:27

it shaped your decision making? Man,

0:29

I've got a great one for this. Tell me

0:30

if your experience has been with this.

0:32

So, I tend to hire ambitious young

0:34

people and I take chances on them. And I

0:37

hate to say it, but the majority of the

0:39

time that is a horrible plan. And it's

0:41

significantly better to hire more

0:43

experienced people and pay them a lot

0:45

more money and I get way better results.

0:49

>> So, uh, when was this mistake? Is this

0:51

like I've been making this mistake

0:53

forever or this is forever?

0:54

>> Man, look, this is like my mistake. It's

0:57

like the American dream, you know, like

0:59

give me your your your broken, your

1:01

weak, and your and your like ambitious

1:03

young

1:04

>> I can fix him.

1:05

>> Yes. And like I always want to do that

1:08

because I'm so, you know, I'm into the

1:09

romantic idea of that and just I uh

1:12

recently, you know, uh at our at

1:14

Hampton, we've hired like significantly

1:16

more experienced people and they cost

1:18

like two or three times more than a

1:20

young and upcoming person, but the

1:21

results are like five or 10 times

1:23

better, right? and and and I just make

1:25

this I always in my I get so emotional

1:28

and I always find the people say hire

1:31

high agency people or hire these people

1:33

whose growth rate is really high but in

1:36

general it's just kind of better to say

1:38

hey you already did this at this other

1:40

company do do it here please

1:42

>> so we were just going through a hiring

1:44

process I wanted to hire somebody on my

1:45

content team and um we found this kid

1:48

who was great and he sent in this like

1:50

wonderful video like he made this video

1:53

application that was super funny and it

1:56

was well done and I was like yes this is

1:57

my kind of guy young green yeah he used

2:01

to do this you know he just graduated

2:02

but like this video is amazing I got to

2:05

talk to this guy talked to him I like

2:06

him good dude and right before we hired

2:09

him you know we asked a very simple

2:10

question which is like so we want this

2:13

to go well right we want this to be

2:15

great and we want this to work and so

2:18

like does it make sense to just go with

2:20

somebody who has never done anything

2:23

even remotely like this or are there

2:25

people in the world who have done very

2:26

similar things that we could go talk to

2:28

first and should we not like lean in

2:30

that direction and as soon as we had

2:32

that like very simple sanity check cuz

2:34

I'm like you I fall in love with the the

2:36

sort of angel investing in people idea

2:38

it's like the like the raw upandcomer

2:42

never done anything found this diamond

2:44

in the rough why do I like that it's not

2:46

for generous reasons it's cuz it's like

2:48

I feel cool that I found that thing

2:50

right it's like finding a needle in a

2:52

hay stack the diamond in the rough. Um,

2:55

but that's in it is like I have such a

2:59

low hit rate with that, right? By

3:00

definition, you're going to have a low

3:01

hit rate with that strategy. And if it

3:04

matters and if there are people who have

3:06

done it before that are way more proven

3:08

in this category, like why are you not

3:10

going in that direction? So, I've

3:11

definitely had that that same mistake

3:13

sometimes. It can work. And when it does

3:15

work, it's the best story. It's the

3:17

best. But like check this out. This

3:19

strategy that I've been doing, it's been

3:20

working well. So, I love hiring

3:21

consultants and agencies, but I'll say,

3:24

"I'm only going to hire you for 2

3:25

months, and I'm going to you're going to

3:27

do the work for the first 30 days, but

3:29

then the second 30 days, it's just you

3:30

teaching me what to do." Uh, and so I

3:33

have found experience of like getting

3:34

like a young, ambitious, high agency,

3:36

green person and teaming them up with an

3:38

agency, and I have had some results with

3:40

that. But in general, just hiring more

3:41

experienced people and paying them more

3:43

money, it's just typically the way to

3:46

go. And that sounds so duh, but I that's

3:50

the biggest mistake that I've made.

3:52

>> Well, most of business is just figuring

3:53

out what are your own leaks in your

3:56

bucket. And then of course to other

3:57

people who don't have that leak, they're

3:59

like what I mean obvious, right? But you

4:01

have to know what are my biases and and

4:04

in your case your biases are like I like

4:06

to be cheap as hell when I build my

4:07

companies. This was like how you were

4:09

before with the hustle at least. It's

4:10

like,

4:10

>> of course,

4:11

>> get the cheap office, put the, you know,

4:13

get the free desk off Craigslist. You

4:15

know, our dog will be security and, you

4:17

know, like you're like, I'm going to

4:19

build this the frugal way. And then

4:21

secondly,

4:22

>> what if I found a guy like me, just a

4:23

lovable [ __ ] who could be fixed? And

4:25

it's like, you know, so those are biases

4:27

that would lead you too far in that

4:29

direction. It's not to say you never

4:30

hire a junior person, but too often

4:33

defaulting to that. And so you got to

4:35

know your bone biases.

4:36

>> What about yours? Do you have one? I

4:38

wrote project selection. So my the my

4:41

theory is this. If you are hardworking

4:44

and you are sufficiently talented, then

4:46

the only variable that matters is

4:48

project what project you pick to work

4:49

on, right? Because if you're going to

4:50

work really hard on it and you're

4:52

talented, then either you're going to be

4:54

a 10 out of 10 person working on a two

4:56

on a two out of 10 opportunity or a 10

4:58

out of 10 person working on a 10 out of

5:00

10 opportunity. And uh I think I have

5:03

picked some real dog [ __ ] projects in

5:05

the past. So, I tried to start a sushi

5:08

restaurant chain, which like restaurants

5:11

are one of the worst businesses. Sushi

5:13

would be one of the worst types of

5:14

restaurants to do. And by the way, that

5:15

makes no sense for me as a person to do.

5:18

The second one, I tried to make the next

5:20

hit social media app. I tried to make

5:22

the next Twitter, the next, you know,

5:24

Facebook, the next Snapchat, and I spent

5:26

six years going after that as a project

5:28

to select. And God, that is hard to do.

5:31

>> You try to make a hit social media app,

5:33

which frankly, you don't really use

5:34

social media. used Twitter, but like

5:36

seldomly to be honest, even though

5:37

you're good at it. And two, you

5:39

eventually made a streaming video game

5:41

like or that's who your market was.

5:44

Neither of us know or play video games

5:46

or like streaming

5:47

>> or had ever streamed a video game in my

5:50

life, dude. I made a I made a craft beer

5:53

app for craft beer enthusiasts. Dude, I

5:55

can't spell beer. Like, you know, like

5:57

beer is gross. It makes me burp. I don't

5:58

know. Like, I don't like it. So, I just

6:00

picked all these terrible projects that

6:01

were bad founder fit,

6:03

>> just weak mark market opportunities in

6:06

general, right? So, this is like very uh

6:08

very poor projects. I started my

6:10

e-commerce brand is a clothing brand.

6:12

You've seen

6:13

>> clothing. You love clothes.

6:14

>> You've seen me dress.

6:16

>> You know what I'm doing? And that one

6:18

worked, but it's such a grind cuz ecom

6:20

and fashion and apparel and inventory.

6:23

It's like, dude, one of the like worst

6:25

projects you can select. I think I've

6:26

been together. Just those projects I

6:28

just mentioned, and by the way, those

6:30

are just the the ones I remember just

6:32

off the top of my head. There's some

6:33

other doozies in there, those are 10

6:35

years of my professional life. I've only

6:38

had 17. So, the the majority of my

6:41

professional life has been spent on

6:43

really poor project selections. And and

さらにアンロック

無料でサインアップしてプレミアム機能にアクセス

インタラクティブビューア

字幕を同期させ、オーバーレイを調整し、完全な再生コントロールでビデオを視聴できます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

AI要約

動画コンテンツ、キーポイント、および重要なポイントのAI生成された要約を即座に取得します。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

翻訳

ワンクリックでトランスクリプトを100以上の言語に翻訳します。任意の形式でダウンロードできます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

マインドマップ

トランスクリプトをインタラクティブなマインドマップとして視覚化します。構造を一目で理解できます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

トランスクリプトとチャット

動画コンテンツについて質問します。AIを利用してトランスクリプトから直接回答を得られます。

無料でサインアップしてアンロック

トランスクリプトをもっと活用する

無料でサインアップして、インタラクティブビューア、AI要約、翻訳、マインドマップなどをアンロックしてください。クレジットカードは不要です。